Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 © 2011 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved. Catalyzing the Nuclear and Chemical Industries Through the Pursuit of Clean, Sustainable Energy Kate Jackson Senior Vice President, Research & Technology & Chief Technology Officer Westinghouse Electric Company Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 © 2011 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved. Why Nuclear Energy? • Meets policy goals to reduce greenhouse gas emissions • Highest reliability • Low cost electricity • Stable uranium fuel sources=less fluctuation in price • Creates thousands of jobs, $430 million per year at each site • History of safe and reliable operation Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 © 2011 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved. Energy Production and Consumption in U.S. – the Potential Market U.S. Primary Energy Flow by Source and Sector, 2009 (Quad -- Quadrillion (1x10 15 ) Btu) U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Sector, 2009 (Million metric tons, CO 2 equivalent AEO 2010, May 2010) Transportation 1845 Mt Residential 1194 Mt Commerical 1034 Mt Industrial 1434 Mt 5507 Mt Total Does not include biofuels that have been blended with petroleum —biofuels are included in “Renewable Energy." Excludes supplemental gaseous fuels. 3Includes less than 0.1 quadrillion Btu of coal coke net exports. 4Conventional hydroelectric power, geothermal, solar/PV, wind, an d biomass. 5Includes industrial combined -heat -and -power (CHP) and industrial electricity -only plants. 6Includes commercial combined -heat -and -power (CHP) and commercial electricity -only plants. 7Electricity -only and combined -heat -and -power (CHP) plants whose primary business is to sell electricity , or electricity and heat, to the public. 1 2 Note: Sum of components may not equal total due to independent r ounding. Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Annual Energy Review 2009, Tables 1.3, 2.1b -2.1f , 10.3, and 10.4. 3 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 © 2011 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved. U.S. Electricity Production Costs 1995-2009, In 2009 cents per kilowatt-hour Cents per Kwh Source: Ventyx Velocity Suite Updated: 5/10 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 © 2010 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved. U.S. Electricity Sources Which Do Not Emit Greenhouse Gases Wind 2.9% Nuclear 73.6% Hydro 22.0% Solar 0.1% Source: Global Energy Decisions / Energy Information Administration Updated: 4/08 Geothermal 1.4% Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 © 2011 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved. Capacity Factors by Generation Type Fuel Type Average Capacity Factors (%) Nuclear 90 Coal (Steam Turbine) 71 Gas (Combined Cycle) 40 Gas (Steam Turbine) 17 Oil (Steam Turbine) 15 Hydro 32 Wind 30 Solar 19 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 © 2011 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved. Broadening the Application for Nuclear • • • • District heating Remote installations / small grid markets Desalination Process heat Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 © 2011 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved. Characteristics of Process Heat Markets Co-generation • Market is highly varied; comprised of multiple plants with varying ratings supplying energy to different industries – Petrochemical, aluminum & plastics plants, paper mills, crude oil and biorefineries, ammonia & fertilizer plants Oil sands and oil shale • Bitumen recovery: Supply of steam to multiple oil sands well pads and oil shale wells • Bitumen upgrading: Supply of process heat and hydrogen to support upgrading to Synthetic Crude Oil • Oil Sands: – Electricity supply; centralized highly efficient electricity supply & distribution – Water treatment; critical issue, modest heat and electricity supply required Source: INL: “High Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactor Projected Markets and Preliminary Economics”, Aug 2011 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 © 2011 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved. Process Heat Market (Estimated) • Co-generation – 75 GWt – Petrochemical, refinery, fertilizer / ammonia plants and others • Oil sands / oil shale – 60 GWt – Steam, electricity, hydrogen & water treatment – Bitumen recovery & upgrading • Hydrogen merchant market – 36 GWt • Synthetic fuels (coal conversion) & feedstock – 249 GWt – Steam, electricity, high temperature fluids, hydrogen – Transportation fuels & feedstock • IPP supply of electricity – 110 GWt – 10% of the nuclear electrical supply increase required to achieve pending Government objectives for emissions reductions by 2050 Source: INL: “High Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactor Projected Markets and Preliminary Economics”, Aug 2011 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 © 2011 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved. Process Heat Applications • Chemical Plants – 1,500 psi (10 MPa) max steam pressure to drive equipment – Many applications need 600 psi (~4 MPa) or less – ~1,500 MWth total per plant – Many sites • Oil Sands – 1,750 psi (12 MPa) – Requires steam compressor development • Lack of off-the-shelf compressor technology • Development challenge is unknown – Harsh site conditions Vision: de-carbonize industrial sector traditionally relying on fossil fuels Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 © 2011 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved. Computer-Aided Process Optimization Software (Processes) in the Nuclear Industry • Nuclear power plant optimization – Efficiency improvement • Current operation at steady state • Reduction of station service requirements • Improved diagnostics and prognostics • Load following capabilities expected for SMR – Potential opportunity to explore and incorporate process optimization software in areas such as control of power output • Fuel Manufacturing process optimization Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 © 2011 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved. What About “Nuclear Waste?” • Used nuclear fuel is currently stored safely, exists in manageable volumes and can be potentially re-used in the future • All of the used nuclear fuel that has been produced in the past 50 years will fit on a football field, stacked 10 meters high • If your personal lifetime consumption of electricity came solely from nuclear energy, the “waste” would easily fit inside a Coke can (about 8 oz). • If all your electricity came solely from coal, you'd generate almost 70 tons of waste Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 © 2011 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved. And then there was Fukushima ● The Fukushima nuclear plants experienced a series of unprecedented natural disasters that exceeded the design basis: Earthquake ground force acceleration of 0.51g vs. design of 0.45g Tsunami wave 14 meters high vs. design of tsunami wall at 5.7 meters ● The station blackout that occurred and the damage that resulted have already provided insight into what can be done to further improve safety at existing plants and those planned for the future Damaged Unit 3 of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant in Okumamachi, Fukushima Prefecture Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 © 2010 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved. The Future of Nuclear Post-Fukushima • • • • • • 30 years of safe and reliable operation Utilities and governments remain committed to nuclear New reactor development will continue Nuclear energy is essential to meet environmental goals New awareness and appreciation for advanced safety systems The Westinghouse AP1000® is designed with advanced safety systems in case of a “beyond design basis” event Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 © 2011 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved. What Makes the AP1000 ® Different? • The AP1000 nuclear power plant can place the reactor in a Safe Shutdown Condition within the first 72 hours of a Station Blackout, without the use of AC power or operator action • With some operator action after 3 days, the AP1000 nuclear power plant continues to maintain reactor core cooling and Spent Fuel Pool cooling indefinitely • The AP1000 nuclear power plant has superior coping capabilities as well as significantly reduced risk for core damage Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 © 2011 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved. Simpler Design Requires Less Equipment 50% Fewer Valves 35% Fewer Pumps 80% Less Pipe 45% Less Seismic Building Volume 85% Less Cable Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 © 2011 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved. AP1000 ® Project Status Six AP1000 units under contract - the first nuclear plant contracts in the U.S. in 30 years. Eight additional AP1000 units are planned. VC Summer Vogtle Unit 3 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 © 2011 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved. Westinghouse AP1000 ® On Schedule for 2013 in China Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 © 2011 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved. Moving Forward with Small Modular Reactors ● Lessons learned from Fukushima incorporated into new and existing plants will further increase safety ● The event has raised awareness and appreciation for passive safety systems like those used in the AP1000® design as well as the Small Modular Reactor Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 What It Is… ● An integral PWR ● Innovative packaging of proven components ● The highest levels of safety with fewer accident scenarios ● Industry-proven equipment designs ● Compact reactor coolant system and containment ● An engineered solution for today’s clean energy challenges …Simplicity in Design © 2011 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved. Containment Vessel Pressurizer Steam Generator Core Makeup Tank Reactor Coolant Pumps Internal Control Rod Drives Reactor Core Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 © 2011 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved. How Small is Small? 25 Westinghouse SMR Containment Vessels fit in a single AP1000® Containment Vessel Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 © 2011 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved. Convergence of Industries • Nuclear has appropriate characteristics for “decarbonizing” the Chemical Industry • As Nuclear plants are called on to cycle, new optimization issues will emerge • Fuel production and waste management offer opportunities for collaboration