By Bret Polopolus Thanks to Itzik Ben-Itzhak and Bishwanath Gaire J.R. Macdonald Laboratory, Physics Department, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas 66506 This work was partially funded under NSF grant number PHY-0851599 Supported by the Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Biosciences Division, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Office of Science, U.S. Department of Energy Overview A molecular ion beam is sent toward a detector The laser interacts with the ion beam dissociating H2+ → H + H+ The particles move through a parallel plate deflector to separate their detection Detector Interaction region L=64mm +V z=668mm Radius=40mm d=30mm -V l=945mm Ideal Parallel Plate Deflector Geometry Plate Length L = 64 mm Plate separation d = 30 mm Detector’s distance from plates z = 668 mm, Distance from interaction to detection l = 944 mm Real Parallel Plate Deflector x ẑ ŷ Without a deflector Fragments with a low Kinetic Energy Release (KER) are lost in the faraday cup Ion Beam is run with an energy of 3-8 keV O2+ dissociation 40 fs laser 1000 6000 8000 Counts Counts 6000 4000 500 4000 2000 0 2000 0.075 1 2 3 KER (eV) 0 0 1 2 KER (eV) 3 4 0 0 1 2 KER (eV) Low KER fragments are lost into the faraday cup 3 4 What is the deflection with yi = 0 and vyi = 0? Detector Interaction region L=64mm +V z=668mm Radius=40mm d=30mm -V l=945mm Equation for deflection Slope with our geometry qV/E is a useful scaling factor between the beam and the defelctor x ẑ ŷ 90 Chi^2/DoF = 0.00002 R^2 = 1 |yf - yi| = 896.62711x +/- 0.02411 90 80 70 70 60 60 50 50 40 Values above this line miss the real detector, i.e., qV/E < 0.045 30 Deflection (mm) |yf - yi| Deflection (mm) |yf - yi| 80 40 30 20 20 10 10 0 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 qV/E V = 30 V = 60 V = 90 V = 120 V = 150 V = 180 0 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 qV/E Correction factor: ratio of real slope simulated in SIMION to ideal slope 896.63/746.67 = 1.20 What can we conclude? Modified ideal equation: Correction factor seems independent of detector position and likely the result of the fringing electric field: Effect of varying initial position y (mm) Deflection along y axis by real deflector with z = 668 mm simulated in SIMION Deflection spread for qV/E = 0.04 ±0.04 mm, which is o.11% yi = 1 26.925 Deflection (mm) |yf - yi| Worst Case Scenario 26.930 26.920 yi = 0.8 26.915 yi = 0.6 yi = 0.4 26.910 yi = 0.2 26.905 yi = 0 26.900 yi = -0.2 26.895 yi = -0.4 26.890 yi = -0.6 26.885 yi = -0.8 26.880 yi = -1 0.02 0.03 qV/E Resolution requirement 0.1 mm 0.04 Result Largest δy was about 0.0408 mm for qV/E = 0.04 Resolution limit on distinguishing deflections: • δy ≥ 0.1 mm qV/E = 0.0632 → δy = 0.1014 • Irrelevant because proton would miss 40 mm detector Conclusion: no need to modify the ideal equation for initial position nor run SIMION for every variation Effect of varying initial transverse velocity, vyi V = 30, qV/E = 0.01 V = 60, qV/E = 0.01 V = 60, qV/E = 0.03 V = 90, qV/E = 0.03 V = 120, qV/E = 0.06 85 80 75 Worst Case Scenario Deflection spread about ±40 mm y = 1.5119*vyi + 26.936 y = 1.4933*vyi + 53.8 70 65 y = 1.2381*vyi + 26.906 60 y (mm) 55 50 y = 1.2439*vyi + 8.9694 45 40 y = 0.8796*vyi + 8.9696 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 vyi (mm/s) Ideal equation t is not constant 15 10 5 0 -5 -10 y (mm) -15 -20 -25 -30 qV/E = 90/3000 = 0.03, y = 0.9945x - 26.904 qV/E = 60/2000 = 0.03, y = 0.9945x - 26.903 qV/E = 60/1000 = 0.06, y = 0.9776x - 53.793 qV/E = 120/2000 = 0.06, y = 0.9779x - 53.793 qV/E = 180/3000 = 0.06, y = 0.9782x - 53.793 -35 -40 -45 -50 -55 -60 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 vyi x tsimion (mm) 40 45 50 55 Result y intercept is Expectation: identical slopes for same qV/E Not the case Explanation → vyi and time of flight are coupled Time of flight is not constant! Use tsimion instead of tideal The Ideal TOF Interaction region L=64mm +V Detector z=668mm d=30mm -V l=945mm tsimion ≠ tideal Radius=40mm x = qV/E terror = tsimion - tideal (ns) Intercept set to 0, yi = 0, vyi = 0 4 3 2 R =1 2 0 0.00 Resolution Requirement 25 ps 2 terror = 3092x + 283.74x - 2.1394x 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.06 0.08 0.10 terror - tfit (ns) qV/E 0.010 0.008 0.006 0.004 0.002 0.000 -0.002 -0.004 -0.006 -0.008 -0.010 -0.012 0.00 Residuals 0.02 0.04 qV/E 2.12 yi = 0.6 Spread ≈ ±71 ps t = tsimion - tideal (ns) 2.10 2.08 yi = 0.4 2.06 yi = 0.2 2.04 yi = 0 2.02 yi = -0.2 2.00 yi = -0.4 1.98 yi = -0.6 1.96 0.030 0.045 qV/E Resolution Requirement 25 ps 0.060 vyi to -V side of deflector 7.0 6.5 6.0 5.5 terror= tsimion- tideal (ns) 5.0 4.5 4.0 qV/E = 0.0075 qV/E = 0.01 qV/E = 0.01 qV/E = 0.012 qV/E = 0.03 qV/E = 0.03 qV/E = 0.045 qV/E = 0.06 qV/E = 0.06 qV/E = 0.06 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 0.000 0.005 0.010 0.015 0.020 vyi (mm/ns) 0.025 0.030 0.035 y=2.8644x+0.025 y=5.0624x+0.0488 y=10.119x+0.0671 y=7.316x+0.075 y=30.031x+0.6187 y=44.522x+0.758 y=32.93x+1.2212 y=57.711x+2.5192 y=86.754x+3.0805 y=192.08x+4.5642 200 180 m = slope from |TOF vs vyi| 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 -20 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 qV/E 0.04 0.05 0.06 Hold E constant, E=3000 eV Hold V constant, V = 60 200 60 180 160 2 m = 47803x + 86.468x m = 989.51x 50 m = slope from |TOF vs vyi| m = slope from |TOF vs vyi| 140 120 100 80 60 40 30 40 20 20 0 -20 0.00 10 0.01 0.02 0.03 qV/E 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 qV/E 0.05 0.06 180000 Scaled slope = slope x E 160000 6 y = 3x10 x 140000 120000 100000 80000 60000 40000 20000 0 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 qV/E 0.04 0.05 0.06 qV/E = 90/3000 = 0.03 y = -95.438x + 1.964 t x E/l (ns eV/mm) t x E/l (ns eV/mm) 2 qV/E = 60/2000 = 0.03 2 0 -2 y = -95.738x + 1.5996 0 -2 0.000 0.005 0.010 0.015 0.020 0.025 0.030 0.035 0.000 0.005 0.010 0.015 0.020 0.025 0.030 0.035 0.030 0.035 Vyi (mm/ns) Vyi (mm/ns) Residuals for 60/2000 Residuals for 90/3000 0.015 0.020 0.010 t x E/l - fit (ns eV/mm) t x E/l - fit (ns eV/mm) 0.015 0.010 0.005 0.000 -0.005 -0.010 0.005 0.000 -0.005 -0.010 -0.015 -0.015 0.000 0.005 0.010 0.015 0.020 0.025 Vyi (mm/ns) 0.030 0.035 0.000 0.005 0.010 0.015 0.020 0.025 Vyi (mm/ns) Deflection yi = 0 no modification vyi and time of flight are coupled Deflection spread ±0.04 mm vyi ≠ 0, Deflection spread about ±40 mm TOF correction for yi = 0, vyi = 0 x = qV/E yi ≠ 0 after y = 0 correction error is reduced to about ± 71 ps vyi ≠ 0 introduces an error of up to 2 ns Future Directions Simulations of vyi directed away from the detector should be run Imaging Rewrite equations to reconstruct vyi