Judicial Restraint v. Judicial Activism

advertisement
Judicial Restraint v.
Judicial Activism
Judicial Restraint
 Stick to a strict interpretation of
the Constitution.
 Use the original intent of the
Framers.
 If Constitution is silent or
ambiguous, defer to states
and/or elected branches.
Judicial Restraint (cont.)
 Judges are not elected and not
accountable to the people.
 They should not be policy makers.
 They should not impose their
personal views.
 Amendments can be used to
update the Constitution if need be.
Judicial Activism
 The Constitution is a “living”
document.
 A broad interpretation should
be used to account for modern
circumstances.
 Uphold the spirit of the
Constitution, not just the letter.
Judicial Activism (cont.)
 Courts are the last resort for the
powerless.
 Legislative majorities can be
discriminatory.
 The Amendment process is too
difficult to navigate.
Selective
Incorporation
Selective Incorporation
 Does the Bill of Rights apply to
actions taken by the states?
 In Barron v. Baltimore (1833), John
Marshall said NO!
 Federalism demands that state
courts be allowed to adjudicate
state laws and actions.
Const.
Bill of
Rights
S.C.
Fed.
Appeals
Fed. District
Courts
Congress
President
F
E
D
E
R
A
L
I
S
M
State
S.C.
State
Appeals
State District
Courts
State
Govt.
Selective Incorporation
(cont.)
 During Reconstruction, the 14th
Amendment was passed to try and
protect freed slaves from unfair state
laws.
 By repeating the “Due Process” clause
and creating the “Equal Protection”
clause, Congress was hoping that unfair
state laws could be struck down by the
S.C..
Const.
Bill of
Rights
14th Amendment
F
S.C.
Fed.
Appeals
Fed. District
Courts
Congress
President
E
D
E
R
A
L
I
S
M
State
S.C.
State
Appeals
State District
Courts
State
Govt.
Selective Incorporation
(cont.)
 In Gitlow v. NY (1925), the S.C.
allowed an individual to use the 14th
Amendment to challenge a state law
restricting free speech.
 Although the Court upheld Gitlow’s
conviction, this case established a
precedent that provisions of the Bill of
Rights could be applied to the states.
Selective Incorporation
(cont.)
 The idea that the 14th Amendment
makes the Bill of Rights applicable to
the states is called the “incorporation
doctrine.”
 Over the past 60 years, the S.C. has, on
a case-by-case basis (i.e., selectively),
“nationalized” most of the provisions
of the Bill of Rights.
Const.
Bill of
Rights
14th Amendment
F
S.C.
Fed.
Appeals
Fed. District
Courts
Congress
President
E
D
E
R
A
L
I
S
M
State
S.C.
State
Appeals
State District
Courts
State
Govt.
Download