The Trans -Pacific Partnership Agreement: an Opportunity for Viet Nam to reduce its Economic Dependence of China Scott H. Murray &Tai H. Pham Discipline of Mathematics & Statistics August, 2014 Contents 1. Problem statement 2. Members of AEC, TPP, RCEP & FTAAP 3. USA’s TPP Vision 4. China’s FTAAP Vision 5. Theories of international trade 6. The Extended Input-Output Table 7. Scenarios 8. Conclusion 1. Problem statement • The ASEAN Economic Community (AEC) by 2015 • The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) by 2014. • Quantitative assessment of economic effects of AEC and TPP on the textile & apparel, footwear and furniture industries in Vietnam The flagship FTAs: AEC, TPP, RCEP & FTAAP? 2. Members of AFTA, TPP, RCEP & FTAAP FTAAP Russia Taiwan RCEP China Korea India Cambodia Indonesia Laos Myanmar Philippines Thailand Brunei Malaysia SIngapore Viet Nam AEC Australia Japan New Zealand Canada Chile Mexico Peru United States TPP TPP RCEP FTAAP 3. USA’s Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement vision • Strengthen ties across three continents: America, Asia, and Oceania • Become basis and means to establish the Free Trade Area of the Asia Pacific (FTAAP) • The baseline: existing US trade and investment agreements • Create mutual benefits among participants • Ensure third parties do not take advantage of the agreement • Apply “yarn-forward” style rules of origin 4. China’s Free Trade Agreement of the Asia Pacific vision • Build step by step the ambitious “New Silk Road” and “New Maritime Silk Road” through bilateral negotiation, Sanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), ASEAN & APEC • Compete with the USA China’s New silk road vision FTA: Beneficial to poor countries? 5. Theories of international trade Mercantilism & Neo-mercantilism Division of labor & new international division of labor The Viner’s model & Extended InputOutput Model Comparative advantage & complementary and competing economies 5.1. China encourages exports and discourages imports Billion USD 400 200 256 169 151 141 139 49 0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 (134) -200 (418) -400 -600 (796) (731) (518) (539) -800 -1000 China United States of America Japan Viet Nam Year 5.2. China keeps its exchange rate weak 5.3. China & New International Division of Labor 5.4. China & Viet Nam are competing economies Trade indicators Revealed symmetric comparative advantage index Intra-industry trade index Trade specialization index Bilateral trade intensity index Trade complementarity index Revealed symmetric comparative advantage (RSCA) index Revealed comparative advantage (RCA) RSCA = = (RCA -1) (RCA +1) HS code 01-05 06-15 16-24 25-27 28-38 39-40 41-43 44-49 50-63 64-67 68-71 72-83 84-85 86-89 90-97 98-99 Animal & Animal Products Vegetable Products Foodstuffs Mineral Products Chemicals & Allied Industries Plastics / Rubbers Raw Hides, Skins, Leather, & Furs Wood & Wood Products Textiles Footwear / Headgear Stone / Glass Metals Machinery / Electrical Transportation Miscellaneous Commodities not elsewhere specified RSCA of VIetnam, relative to RSCA of China, relative to China 0.8 0.8 0.3 0.7 (0.5) 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.5 (0.1) (0.4) (0.4) (0.5) (0.2) 0.6 Maximum value Minimum value Critical point Global Vietnam 0.5 (0.8) 0.5 (0.8) (0.1) (0.3) (0.1) (0.7) (0.7) 0.5 0.1 (0.2) 0.4 (0.0) (0.1) (0.1) 0.6 (0.1) 0.8 (0.5) (0.2) 0.1 (0.4) 0.4 (0.1) 0.4 (0.7) 0.5 0.0 0.2 (0.6) (0.6) Explanatory notes Global (0.4) (0.5) (0.4) (0.8) (0.3) (0.1) 0.4 (0.2) 0.5 0.6 (0.1) 0.0 0.3 (0.3) 0.3 (0.9) 1 -1 Comparative advantage = >0 HS code - top ten RSCA of VIetnam, relative to RSCA of China, relative to China Global Vietnam Global '85 Electrical, electronic equipment (0.2) 0.1 0.2 0.3 '27 Mineral fuels, oils, distillation products, etc 0.8 (0.1) (0.8) (0.8) '64 Footwear, gaiters and the like, parts thereof 0.5 0.8 (0.5) 0.6 '62 Articles of apparel, accessories, not knit or crochet 0.4 0.7 (0.4) 0.5 '61 Articles of apparel, accessories, knit or crochet '84 Machinery, nuclear reactors, boilers, etc 0.2 0.7 (0.2) 0.6 (0.6) (0.4) 0.6 0.2 '03 Fish, crustaceans, molluscs, aquatic invertebrates nes '94 Furniture, lighting, signs, prefabricated buildings '09 Coffee, tea, mate and spices 0.8 0.8 (0.8) (0.0) 0.1 0.6 (0.1) 0.5 0.9 0.9 (0.9) (0.4) '10 Cereals 1.0 0.7 (1.0) Explanatory notes (0.8) Maximum value Minimum value Critical point 1 -1 Comparative advantage = >0 5.4. TPP & Vietnam are complementary Trade indicators Revealed symmetric comparative advantage index Intra-industry trade index Trade specialization index Bilateral trade intensity index Trade complementarity index HS code RSCA of VIetnam, relative to TPP 01-05 06-15 16-24 25-27 28-38 39-40 41-43 44-49 50-63 64-67 68-71 72-83 84-85 86-89 90-97 98-99 Animal & Animal Products Vegetable Products Foodstuffs Mineral Products Chemicals & Allied Industries Plastics / Rubbers Raw Hides, Skins, Leather, & Furs Wood & Wood Products Textiles Footwear / Headgear Stone / Glass Metals Machinery / Electrical Transportation Miscellaneous Commodities not elsewhere specified 0.5 0.5 0.1 (0.0) (0.7) 0.1 0.7 (0.1) 0.8 1.0 (0.2) (0.3) (0.2) (0.8) 0.0 (0.7) Global 0.5 RSCA of TPP, relative to Vietnam Global (0.5) (0.0) 0.5 (0.5) (0.1) (0.1) (0.1) 0.0 (0.7) 0.7 0.1 (0.1) 0.4 (0.7) (0.1) 0.1 0.6 (0.8) 0.8 (1.0) (0.2) 0.2 (0.4) 0.3 (0.1) 0.2 (0.7) 0.8 0.0 (0.0) (0.6) 0.7 Explanatory notes 0.1 (0.2) (0.1) (0.1) (0.0) (0.4) 0.0 (0.5) (0.8) 0.0 (0.0) 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.3 Maximum value 1 Minimum value -1 Critical point Comparative advantage = >0 HS code - top ten RSCA of VIetnam, relative to TPP Global RSCA of TPP, relative to Vietnam Global '85 Electrical, electronic equipment 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 '27 Mineral fuels, oils, distillation products, etc 0.1 (0.1) (0.2) 0.1 '64 Footwear, gaiters and the like, parts thereof 1.0 0.8 (0.8) 1.0 '62 Articles of apparel, accessories, not knit or crochet 0.9 0.7 (0.7) 0.9 0.9 0.7 (0.7) 0.9 (0.4) (0.4) 0.1 (0.4) 0.8 0.8 (0.1) 0.8 0.7 0.6 (0.3) 0.7 1.0 0.9 (0.5) 1.0 0.7 0.2 Explanatory notes 0.6 '61 Articles of apparel, accessories, knit or crochet '84 Machinery, nuclear reactors, boilers, etc '03 Fish, crustaceans, molluscs, aquatic invertebrates nes '94 Furniture, lighting, signs, prefabricated buildings '09 Coffee, tea, mate and spices '10 Cereals 0.6 Maximum value Minimum value Critical point 1 -1 Comparative advantage = >0 Extended Input-Output Table for Vietnam Inaccurate data of value of exports and imports between Viet Nam and countries Countries_export > VN_import: 3.3% Countries_import > VN_export: 5.8% Billion USD 160 140 120 100 80 60 Viet Nam_imports_Countries 40 Countries_exports_Viet Nam 20 Viet Nam_exports_Countries 0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Countries_imports_Viet Nam Inaccurate data of value of exports and imports between Viet Nam and China Billion USD 35 China_export > VN_import: 8.6% 30 China_import > VN_export: 1.2% 25 20 15 10 Viet Nam_imports_China 5 China_exports_Viet Nam 0 2007 2008 Viet Nam_exports_China 2009 2010 2011 2012 China_imports_Viet Nam Inaccurate data on exports and imports between TPP and Viet Nam Billion USD 60 TPP export > VN_import: 4.6% 50 TPP_import > VN_export: 10.2% 40 30 20 Viet Nam_imports_TPP 10 TPP_exports_Viet Nam 0 2007 2008 2009 Viet Nam_exports_TPP 2010 2011 2012 TPP_imports_Viet Nam Inaccurate data on exports and imports between ASEAN* and Viet Nam Billion USD VN_imports > ASEAN*_exports: 0.02% 12 VN_exports > Asean*_imports: 27.0% 10 8 6 Viet Nam_imports_Asean* 4 Asean*_exports_Viet Nam 2 Viet Nam_exports_Asean* 0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Asean*_imports_Viet Nam 6. Extended Input-Output Table for Vietnam Intermediate use 67% 11% 7% 3% Domestic 67% TPP 10% RoW 5% Asean* 4% FTAAP* 5% RCEP* 3% China 6% FTAAP 28% RCEP 23% ASEAN 9% 6. Extended Input-Output Table for Vietnam Consumption use 70% 5% 3% 9% Domestic 70% TPP 8% RoW 7% ASEAN* 3% FTAAP* 3% FTAAP 23% RCEP* 4% RCEP 20% China 5% ASEAN 7% 6. Extended Input-Output Table for Vietnam Investment use 59% 13% 3% 9% Domestic 59% 41% = 0 30% < 0 TPP 12% 29% > 0 ASEAN* 3% RoW 10% China 8% FTAAP* 4% FTAAP 31% RCEP* 4% RCEP 27% ASEAN 8% 6. Extended Input-Output Table of Vietnam IMPORT FTAAP 81% RoW 20% PRODUCE 55% FTAAP* 12% USE TPP 29% 45% ASEAN 25% ASEAN* 9% RCEP* 11% RCEP 68% EXPORT China 19% TPP 55% RoW 25% FTAAP 74% FTAAP* 3% RCEP* 3% RCEP 47% ASEAN 17% China 7% Asean* 7% 6.1. Vietnam's imports from the blocs TPP Billion USD ASEAN* China RCEP* 35.0 33.3 34.2 31.4 29.1 30.0 25.1 23.8 25.0 23.1 20.7 20.0 15.0 18.3 15.1 16.3 11.9 10.0 5.0 .0 2007 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 6.2. Vietnam's exports to the blocs TPP ASEAN* China RCEP* Billion USD 60.0 50.5 50.0 40.8 40.0 33.8 30.0 33.4 28.6 26.6 20.0 16.2 11.1 10.0 3.2 4.3 4.7 2007 2008 2009 7 .0 2010 Year 2011 2012 Top ten exporters to Vietnam Unit: Billion USD Viet Nam imports from: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 11.9 15.1 16.3 23.1 29.0 34.2 48.6 Korea, Republic of 5.8 7.8 7.1 9.7 13.5 15.9 21.1 Singapore 6.5 8.7 7.0 7.4 10.2 10.4 10.9 Japan 5.7 7.8 6.5 8.2 9.6 10.7 10.6 Taipei, Chinese 6.8 7.9 6.0 7.5 9.0 8.4 8.9 Thailand 4.0 5.0 4.7 5.8 7.1 6.7 7.2 India 1.2 1.8 1.8 2.5 5 3.7 6.0 United States of America 1.9 2.8 3.1 3.7 4.3 4.6 5.0 Malaysia 2.3 2.4 2.3 3.5 3.8 3.8 4.2 Germany 1.7 1. 5 1.6 2.0 2.6 2.5 2.5 Indonesia 1.4 1.7 1.5 1.9 2.4 2.3 2.4 Australia 1.2 1.3 1.1 1.4 2.1 1.8 2.0 China Top ten exporters to Vietnam Unit: Billion USD Viet Nam imports from: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 19.9% 20.1% 22.9% 25.2% 25.0% 27.0% 33.8% 9.7% 10.4% 10.0% 10.6% 11.6% 12.5% 14.7% 10.9% 11.6% 9.8% 8.1% 8.8% 8.2% 7.6% 9.6% 10.4% 9.1% 8.9% 8.3% 8.4% 7.4% 11.4% 10.5% 8.4% 8.2% 7.8% 6.6% 6.2% Thailand 6.7% 6.6% 6.6% 6.3% 6.1% 5.3% 5.0% India 2.0% 2.4% 2.5% 2.7% 4.3% 2.9% 4.2% United States of America 3.2% 3.7% 4.4% 4.0% 3.7% 3.6% 3.5% Malaysia 3.9% 3.2% 3.2% 3.8% 3.3% 3.0% 2.9% Germany 2.8% 2.0% 2.2% 2.2% 2.2% 2.0% 1.7% Indonesia 2.3% 2.3% 2.1% 2.1% 2.1% 1.8% 1.7% Australia 2.0% 1.7% 1.5% 1.5% 1.8% 1.4% 1.4% China Korea, Republic of Singapore Japan Taipei, Chinese Top ten importers from Vietnam Unit: Billion USD Viet Nam exports to: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 11.4 13.9 13.0 15.9 18.5 21.4 26,0 China 3.2 4.3 4.7 7.0 11.1 16.2 16.9 Japan 6.1 9.1 7.0 8.2 11.6 15.1 14.2 Germany 2.9 3.5 3.2 3. 9 5.6 6.6 7.4 Korea, Republic of 1.4 2.0 2.4 3.3 5.1 5.7 7.2 Malaysia 1.8 2.3 2.1 2.6 3.4 5.2 6.0 United Kingdom 1.9 2.2 1.9 2.2 3.0 3.9 4.5 France 1.7 1.8 1.7 1.9 2.7 3.5 3.7 Australia 3.7 4.4 2.5 2.8 2.9 3.3 3.7 Thailand 1.1 1.4 1.4 1.4 2.0 3.0 3.3 Singapore 2.1 2. 4 2.3 1.6 1.7 2.2 3.1 Italy 1.0 1.2 1.0 1.2 1.8 2.33 2.9 United States of America Top ten importers from Vietnam Unit: Billion USD Viet Nam exports to: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 21.8% 20.5% 21.1% 20.7% 18.5% 16.8% 18.8% China 6.1% 6.4% 7.6% 9.1% 11.1% 12.7% 12.2% Japan 11.7% 13.5% 11.3% 10.7% 11.6% 11.8% 10.3% Germany 5.6% 5.2% 5.2% 5.1% 5.6% 5.2% 5.4% Korea, Republic of 2.7% 3.0% 3.9% 4.3% 5.1% 4.5% 5.2% Malaysia 3.4% 3.4% 3.4% 3.4% 3.4% 4.1% 4.3% United Kingdom 3.6% 3.3% 3.1% 2.9% 3.0% 3.1% 3.3% France 3.3% 2.7% 2.8% 2.5% 2.7% 2.7% 2.7% Australia 7.1% 6.5% 4.1% 3.6% 2.9% 2.6% 2.7% Thailand 2.1% 2.1% 2.3% 1.8% 2.0% 2.4% 2.4% Singapore 4.0% 3.5% 3.7% 2.1% 1.7% 1.7% 2.2% Italy 1.9% 1.8% 1.6% 1.6% 1.8% 1.8% 2.1% United States of America ( I Arr )1 Ars 7. Scenarios The scenarios reduces economic dependence on China 7.1. The Extended Input-Output Table Unit: Billion VND Final use Intermediate used Consumption HHs. Domestic Investment Govt. Export 1,171,126 552,607 76,626 294,203 174,174 73,383 724 59,563 307,844 62,671 24,118 239 15,155 102,183 China 114,097 45,628 470 40,394 200,589 RCEP* 57,560 34,727 264 21,433 113,984 FTAAP* 80,441 27,615 297 17,940 126,293 RoW 97,805 57,489 486 52,317 208,097 586,748 262,960 2,480 206,802 1,058,990 815,567 79,106 501,005 TPP Asean* Total Import Total Intermediate 1,757,874 Value added 1,094,242 Total 2,852,116 757,554 Total 2,852,116 Unit: Billion VND 7.2. Scenario 1 Final use Intermediate used Domestic Consumption HHs. Govt. Investment Export 1,171,126 552,607 76,626 294,203 174,174 73,383 724 59,563 307,844 62,671 24,118 239 15,155 102,183 119,802 47,909 494 42,414 210,619 RCEP* 57,560 34,727 264 21,433 113,984 FTAAP* 80,441 27,615 297 17,940 126,293 RoW 97,805 57,489 486 52,317 208,097 592,453 265,241 2,504 208,822 1,069,020 817,848 79,130 503,025 TPP Asean* TPP + AEC Total Import Total Intermediate 1,763,579 Value added 1,038,208 Total 2,801,787 GDP - 5.1% 707,225 Total 2,801,787 7.3. Scenario 2 Unit: Billion VND Final use Intermediate used Domestic Consumption HHs. Govt. Investment Export 1,171,126 552,607 76,626 294,203 174,174 73,383 724 59,563 307,844 62,671 24,118 239 15,155 102,183 131,782 52,700 543 46,655 231,680 RCEP* 57,560 34,727 264 21,433 113,984 FTAAP* 80,441 27,615 297 17,940 126,293 RoW 97,805 57,489 486 52,317 208,097 604,433 270,032 2,553 213,063 1,090,081 822,639 79,179 507,266 TPP Asean* TPP + AEC Total Import Total Intermediate 1,775,559 Value added 1,026,228 Total 2,801,787 GDP - 6.2% 707,225 Total 2,801,787 ( I Arr )1 Ars 7.4. Scenarios (cont.) Scenarios reduce economic dependence on China 7.5. Scenario 3 Unit: Billion VND Final use Intermediate used Consumption Investment Export Total HHs. Govt. 1,171,787 552,607 76,626 295,203 China + AEC + TPP 115,705 46,541 479 41,202 203,927 RoW 472,651 217,332 2,010 166,408 858,401 Total Import 588,356 263,873 2,489 207,610 1,062,328 816,480 79,115 501,813 Domestic Total Intermediate 1,760,143 Value added 1,112,151 Total 2,872,294 GDP + 1.6% 777,071 2,872,294 7.6. Scenario 4 Unit: Billion VND Final use Intermediate used Consumption Investment Export Total HHs. Govt. 1,171,787 555,082 76,626 295,244 China + AEC + TPP 115,705 46,541 479 41,202 203,927 RoW 472,651 217,332 2,010 166,408 858,401 Total Import 588,356 263,873 2,489 207,610 1,062,328 818,955 79,115 502,854 Domestic Total Intermediate 1,760,143 Value added 1,115,667 Total 2,872,810 GDP + 2.0% 777,071 2,872,810 7.7. Scenario 5 Unit: Billion VND Final use Intermediate used Consumption Investment Export Total HHs. Govt. 1,171,787 559,385 76,626 296,806 China + AEC + TPP 115,705 46,541 479 41,202 203,927 RoW 472,651 217,332 2,010 166,408 858,401 Total Import 588,356 263,873 2,489 207,610 1,062,328 823,258 79,115 504,416 Domestic Total Intermediate 1,760,143 Value added 1,121,531 Total 2,881,675 GDP + 2.5% 777,071 2,881,675 8. Conclusion Thanks for listening!