Status & Future of Binding Authorities in the US PRESENTED AT THE: NORTH AMERICAN BINDING AUTHORITIES CONFERENCE SEPTEMBER 25, 2014 BY: BERND G. HEINZE, ESQ. AAMGA EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Agenda State of the Surplus Lines Market Events Impacting Wholesale Insurance Professionals Federal & State regulatory developments Overview of US excess and surplus lines market Issues and Opportunities Open discussion North American Binding Authorities 2014 External Market Environment Current Market Conditions E&S Market Outperformed P&C Market in 2013 92.4% combined vs. 95.8% Doubled net income over 2012 19 of top 25 markets grew by more than 10% Top 25 produce 75% DWP Lloyd’s & AIG = 30% Berkshire Hathaway = 39% growth Berkley moves from 5th to 4th ahead of Zurich Premium increased => sustainable (?) Return to underwriting profitability Low interest rates Current Market Conditions E&S Market Outperformed P&C Market in 2013 Adequate pricing and underwriting integrity Growth in unique and creative product lines Stable for now…but caution on diminishing average rate increases A/Y reserve development more favorable than P&C market Gap shrinking: excess capacity low interest rates and capital outlays to enhance operational efficiencies Transformative phase of consolidation and specialization Largest E&S Premiums by State (Top 5) State 2013 (US$) 2012 (US$) 2011 (US$) % from 2012 California $5,305,996,906 $5,057,111,503 $4,998,686,446 4.9% Texas $4,883,847,632 $4,339,279,902 $4,220,187,772 12.5% Florida $4,592,462,577 $4,204,711,182 $3,730,727,071 9.2% New York $2,911,263,983 $2,625,552,790 $2,883,087,795 10.9% $1,250,000,000 $1,096,107,216 16.7% New Jersey $1,458,333,300 Largest growth State (2013): North Carolina $822.3 million – increase of 42.8% 2013 S/L Stamping Office Premium State 2013 Prem ($M) 2012 Prem (M) % Chg AZ $406.8 $339.8 19.7% CA $5,187.8 $4,851.9 6.9% FL $4,592.5 $4,116.9 11.6% ID $76.9 $60.2 27.2% IL $1,160.1 $1,075.4 7.9% MN $418.8 $356.8 17.4% MS $345.3 $307.1 12.4% $22,467 $19,449.3 15.5% Total* * Total of all 14 State Stamping and Surplus Lines Offices 2013 S/L Stamping Office Premium State 2013 Prem ($M) 2012 Prem (M) % Chg NV $249.2 $232.1 7.4% NY $2,944.2 $2,047.6 43.8% OR $253.8 $227.1 11.8% PA $1,267.4 $981.7 30.0% TX $4,706.3 $4,015.9 17.2% UT $179.6 $170.3 5.5% WA $669.3 $666.5 0.4% Total* $22.467 $19.449.3 15.5% US S/L $37.72 $34,808 8.4% * Total of all 14 State Stamping and Surplus Lines Offices 2013 S/L Stamping Office Premium State 2013 Prem ($M) 2012 Prem (M) % Chg Total* $22,467 $19,449.3 15.5% US S/L $37.72 $34.81 8.4% 51.7% of all US S/L Premium written in 14 states with stamping offices * Total of all 14 State Stamping and Surplus Lines Offices Largest US MGA’s/Wholesale Broker/Lloyd’s Coverholders Company 2013 Prem (US$) Variance % Risk Placement Services $2.34 billion 14.1% $201 million 12.9% 60% $1.1 billion 29.4% $265 million 20.5% 70% AmRisc, L.P. $850 million 14.1% $106 million 2.7% 65% The Shinnerer Group $685 million 0.1% $85.1 million (1.3)% 5.0% Appalachian Underwriters $410 million 2.0% $39.2 million 0% 15% Gresham & Associates $399 million 15.8% $40 million 12.7% 50% Program Brokerage $340 million 22.1% $32.6 million 20.7% 21.4% Markel Midwest $336 million 17.7% $59.2 million 121.3% 82% K&K Insurance Group $282 million 17.3% $58.2 million 15.9% 5.0% The Sullivan Group $189 million 4.6% $20.7 million 3.2% 32% Burns & Wilcox 2013 Gross Rev (US$) Variance % E&S % Premium Volume of 10 Largest US MGA’s Year Premium (US$) 2004 $4.66 billion 2005 $4.16 billion 2006 $3.24 billion 2007 $5.25 billion 2008 $4.50 billion 2009 $4.35 billion 2010 $5.16 billion 2011 $5.45 billion 2012 $6.14 billion 2013 $7.02 billion US MGA’s Most Common Classes of Business General Liability: Commercial Property: Professional Liability: Commercial Auto: Employment Practices: Directors & Officers: 92% 92% 86% 86% 83% 83% Largest US Property & Casualty Wholesalers Company AmWINS Group 2013 Prem (US$) Variance % 2013 Gross Rev (US$) Variance % E&S % $8.1 billion 21.6% $668 million 14.9% 66% $4.99 billion 10.2% 658 million 7.6% 30% Cooper Gay Swett & Crawford $4.8 billion 11.6% $380 million 9.5% 55% Ryan Specialty Group $3.7 billion 55.7% $304 million 44.4% 83% All Risks, Ltd. $1.1 billion 27.8% $96 million 23.9% 67% US Risk Insurance $575 million 43.8% $55 million 11.7% 90% ARC Excess & Surplus $575 million 4.5% $53 million 17.8% 25% Brown & Riding $481 million 61.9% $40 million 52.6% 68% Worldwide Facilities $481 million 16.2% $41 million 13.6% --% Partners Specialty $434 million 8.6% $32.8 million 8.2% 70% CRC/Crump Premium Volume of 10 Largest P&C Wholesalers Year Premium (US$) 2005 $12.87 billion 2006 $17.32 billion 2007 $12.79 billion 2008 $12.39 billion 2009 $12.73 billion 2010 $12.05 billion 2011 $17.12 billion 2012 $20.82 billion 2013 $25.20 billion US P&C Wholesalers Most Common Classes of Business General Liability: Inland Marine: Umbrella/Excess: Commercial Auto: Commercial Liability: Employment Practices: Directors & Officers: Product Liability: 90% 86% 86% 86% 83% 80% 80% 80% AAMGA Membership Composition - 2014 258 Wholesale Insurance members 132 US and international risk bearing (80%) and non-risk bearing (20%) Associate members 59 Business service members 14 US State Stamping & Surplus Lines Offices 463 Total Corporate Members 38,511 employees 407 Under Forty Organisation Members The Present 258 Wholesale Insurance/Coverholder members 78% transact business as wholesale MGA/MGU with binding authority 29% transact business as Program Administrators/Managers with binding authority 22.5% transact business as Aggregators with binding authority 20% transact business as Broker Producers without binding authority The Present 258 Wholesale Insurance/Coverholder members 70 members each with 20 or less employees 81 members each with between 21 and 50 employees 35 members each with between 51 and 125 employees 72 members each with > 126 employees 21,877 employees 227 branch offices AAMGA Membership Composition 258 Wholesale Insurance member demographics 31.2% are 20 – 30 years old 26.7% are 31 – 40 years old 28.4% are 41 – 50 years old 13.7% are over 50 years old 57.9% are under the age of 40 years old The Present 258 Wholesale Insurance members Underwriting facilities with delegated binding authority Total AWP: 2013: 2012: 2011: 2010: US$22.4 billion US$20.6 billion US$19.2 billion US$16.4 billion AWP Broked into Lloyd’s: 2013: 2012: US$3.26 billion US$2.73 billion AAMGA Member AWP Broked Into Lloyd’s Risks placed through Lloyd’s Brokers 2013: US$3.26 billion 2012: US$2.73 billion 3,500,000,000.00 3,000,000,000.00 2,500,000,000.00 2,000,000,000.00 Weighted Average 1,500,000,000.00 1,000,000,000.00 500,000,000.00 2010 2011 2012 2013 AAMGA Coverholders AWP vs. Total Lloyd's US AWP 8,000,000,000.00 7,000,000,000.00 6,000,000,000.00 5,000,000,000.00 Total 4,000,000,000.00 AAMGA 3,000,000,000.00 2,000,000,000.00 1,000,000,000.00 2010 2011 2012 2013 E&S Market Rates and Movements Data – Data – Data Those who are not up-to-date with automation will have increasing difficulties Harmonization of: Predictive analytics and risk models, and underwriting discipline Coverholder Audits Regulatory compliance and guidance Big data and large scale aggregation of information Disintermediation E&S Market Rates and Movements Standard markets will back out of accounts that are hard to price and service Succession & Disaster Plans Business Plans by line of business Continuing Education and professional development Increasing need for new talent, enhanced training and retaining existing professionals AAMGA’s 2015 Gamma Iota Sigma Presentation: “Welcome to the New E&S” Differentiation & Remaining Relevant M&A Current Forces Impacting S/L Insurance Continued mergers and acquisitions / consolidation M&A deals of P&C entities 2014: 141 YTD 2013: 62 Aggregate deal value: $6.4 billion Small to Medium-sized deals 2012: 73 Aggregate deal value: $7.4 billion Various-sized deals Influx of non-traditional sources of capital increases competition and adds pressure on rates Current Forces Impacting S/L Insurance Continued mergers and acquisitions / consolidation Appetite is still strong More players in the M&A space, especially for MGA and Program operations Still lots of potential candidates Aging owners Many do not have good succession plans Size matters more than ever to markets. Current Forces Impacting S/L Insurance Continued mergers and acquisitions / consolidation Technology and data are expensive and critical Many of the smaller firms cannot afford to keep up Value is driven by: Specialization Profit margin Market and territorial access Talent within the operation Industries Poised for Growth Next 10 Years Health Care Natural Resources Health Sciences Tech & Bio Tech Energy (Traditional) Light Manufacturing Alternative Energy Insourced manufacturing Petrochemical Export-Oriented Agriculture Industries Shipping (Rail, Marine, Trucking & Pipeline) Construction Insurers’ ability to capitalize on these industries varies widely Current Forces Impacting S/L Insurance Increasing volatility in US investment market, political atmosphere of dissention and stagnation Increasing regulatory environment Federal State International Increasing proliferation of regulatory activities across borders Risk-based capital standards Cooperation & Competition among regulators Global capital standards Implementation of enforcement standards US Federal & State Regulatory Developments Impacting Wholesale Insurance Business FIO Report 24 September 2014 “…the insurance industry showed increasing resilience through 2013, with strong financial performance and expanded overall growth. While the insurance market is becoming ever-more global, the U.S. domestic market remains highly competitive and an important cornerstone of the national economy.” Michael McRaith, FIO Director Regulatory Developments Reauthorization of TRIA/NARAB II Legislation to allow E&S market to write private flood cover NAIC uniform eligibility standards for surplus line carriers NRRA implementation US Legislative & Regulatory Activity Post Dodd-Frank Era of Insurer Regulation Non-Admitted & Reinsurance Reform Act (NRRA) Home State Retention of 100% of Surplus Lines Premium Increased accuracy of premium and tax revenue Non-Admitted Insurance Multistate Act (NIMA) Five States Participating: Florida, Louisiana, Utah, South Dakota and Wyoming + Puerto Rico Florida Clearinghouse Surplus Lines Insurance Multistate Compact (SLIMPACT) “Uniform” Eligibility Standards & Market Security Joint Industry Letters NAIC International Insurers Department (IID) List State White Lists S/L Premium Tax Pre - NRRA Policyholder Home State: 22.8% A: 1.7% Broker B: 13.5% L: 15.47% Surplus Lines Premium tax allocated by state by share of risk proportionately calculated to reside in each state K: 11.9% J: 6.9% I: 7.1 C: 2.87% D: 6.4% E: 0.46% F: 5.37% H: 1.6% G: 3.9% S/L Premium Tax Post - NRRA Policyholder Broker/MGA Surplus Lines Premium tax calculated at and paid to Home State’s based on tax rate and rules Home State: 100% Legislative & Regulatory Activity OFAC, FATCA, COI & AML Regulations Impact on domestic vs. Lloyd’s market placements Forced Place Insurance National Association of Insurance Commissioners Transparency & Regulatory Issues Surplus Lines Task Force NCOIL International Regulatory Task Force Regular liaising with US House & Senate, and all governmental agencies US Litigation, Regulatory & Amicus Curiae Activity Hull & Company v. Superior Court of CA Gold & Silver v. Lexington Insurance Company Essex Insurance Company v. Zota WA Department of Transportation v. James River Insurance Company WI, CO, NJ, NY, MA, FL, OK, CA challenges to freedom of rate and form US Litigation, Regulatory & Amicus Curiae Activity Faulty workmanship” constituting a covered “occurrence” under CGL policies - cases and regulations in CO, GA, SC & HI Delaware retroactive increase to surplus lines tax Utah premium audit law Illinois increase in surplus lines tax “ Legislation & Regulatory Affairs International: Lloyd’s Audit Scope Central Services Refresh Tribunalization process of new coverholders Coverholder guidance TCF Standards & Policyholder Complaint Procedures AML/Conflict of Interest Guidance Lloyd’s Meet the Market: Boston, Chicago, Toronto Canadian MGA’s Collaborative Efforts with Lloyd’s Regular communications / joint presentations with Lloyd’s and Lloyd’s US on matters impacting Coverholders and domestic wholesale market LMA, LiiBA, MGAA reciprocal membership in AAMGA 10th February 2014 LMA Presentation at Lloyd’s North American Binding Authorities 2014 Internal Market Developments Automation & Technology Increasing investment in automation Agency management systems to drive efficiencies Excess & Surplus Lines Working Group Vision for straight through processing Web service ACORD XML – Property & G/L ER3001 Reporting standard for XML with some modifications Validation at time of processing Automation & Technology Benefits: Validation completed at time transaction is processed Time saved preparing month-end bordereaux Access to data is in real-time Themes: Faster: Real time XML exposure reporting Smarter: Built-in rules and validation Together: Keeping respective interests harmonized and synchronized Automation & Technology AAMGA Automation Conference 21-23 March 2015 – Seattle, WA AAMGA Automation Committee Monthly conference calls Working group Liaising with other industry automation entities IIABA Agent’s Council on Technology E&S Joint Working Group Lloyd’s Automation Conference Emerging Risks, Issues & Trends Foresight and knowledge sharing are essential to navigate a future in which change is the only constant AAMGA Initiatives Emerging Risks Committee Drones Autonomous cars 3-D Printers CME’s AAMGA Initiatives Outreach to entire wholesale market and related affinity groups Latin American Association of Insurance Agents Chinese American Insurance Agents Association National African American Insurance Agents Lloyd’s Market Association Managing General Agents Association (UK) London & International Insurance Brokers Association Bringing wholesale insurance network under common umbrella Issues & Opportunities Issues & Opportunities Balancing: Lloyd's objectives in establishing model Wordings that will protect the franchise and ensure uniform interpretation and application of compliance standards, with Coverholders in the United States being afforded the opportunity to access the Lloyd's trading platform without burdensome/non-essential regulations that do not add to the operational transfer of risk or the quality of underwriting Issues & Opportunities The consistency of inconsistencies: Varying Interpretation(s) of Lloyd’s Guidance Hurricane Sandy coverage declination letters and claim practices Time and process required to renew and approve new Coverholder Contracts Prospect for expedited procedures or a form of Continuous Contracts The Way Forward Standardized audit scope and the performance of auditors Mutually beneficial solutions to enhance affordability, efficiencies and expediency of placing business into Lloyd’s Continued expediting of tribunalization of new Coverholders Partnering on provision of technology solutions to afford greater access and efficiencies Issues & Opportunities Temper proportionate and consistent application of balanced regulatory and claims requirements Prospect of regulatory compliance and enforcement of sanctions impeding creative solutions to specialized risks and the freedom of rate and form The Way Forward Coverholders remain committed to the Lloyd’s trading platform and franchise Improve market modernisation, access, intelligence and support Fostering of relationship and efforts with London Brokers and Lloyd’s Embracing the principles articulated in Vision 2025 Enhancing diversity and inclusion initiatives to better represent the entire wholesale underwriting community Open Discussion Thank You Bernd G. Heinze, Esq. 610 Freedom Business Center Suite 110 King of Prussia, PA 19406 610.992.0022 (o) 610.992.0021 (fax) bernie@aamga.org www.aamga.org