Implant Strategies ANS 426 Implants Perhaps the most studied beef management tool on the planet Effects on performance well understood Carcass quality effects are a byproduct of performance studies Implants Now Available for Cattle EB20/PROG200 Synovex-S, Component E-S EB20/TEST200 Synovex-H, Component E-H E 25.7 Compudose, E 45 Encore TBA 140 Component T-S, Finaplix-S ; TBA 200 FinaplixH, Component T-H E24/TBA120 Revalor-S, Component TE-S, Synovex T120 E14/TBA140 Revalor-H, Component TE-H E28/TBA200 Synovex Plus E20/TBA200 Revalor-200, Component TE-200 Z36 Ralgro, Z72 Magnum EB10/PROG 100 Synovex-C, Component E-C E8/TBA 40 Revalor-G, Component TE-G, Synovex T40 E16/TBA80 Revalor-IS, Component TE-IS, Synovex T80 E8/TBA80 Revalor-IH, Component TE-IH E10/TBA100 Synovex Choice E40/TBA200 Revalor-XS 32 Implants differing in: Delivery system payout duration Active ingredient Potency How Implants Work Pituitary ESTROGENS ANDROGENS Growth hormone Beta agonists MUSCLE Protein synthesis X Protein breakdown Implants by active ingredient and potency Low potency estrogen Ralgro, Synovex-C, Component E-C Low potency combination Revalor-G, Component TE-G, Moderate potency estrogen Magnum, Synovex-S, Synovex-H, Component E-S, Component E-H, Compudose, Encore Implants by active ingredient and potency Moderate potency androgen Finaplix-H, Component T-H, Component T-S, FinaplixS Moderate potency combination Revalor-IS, Revalor-IH, Synovex Choice, Component TE-IS, Component TE-IH, High potency combination Revalor-S, Revalor-H, Component TE-S, Component TE-H, Revalor-200, Component TE-200 , Synovex Plus, Revalor-XS Implants Improve rate and efficiency of weight gain Have greater response in animals that have genetic potential and proper nutrition CP of diet important Will not compensate for poor management Implanting Implanting castrated calves recovers the weight gain lost from castrating Hormone replacement therapy Bull calves are often discounted at the sale barn Therefore implanting adds value while avoiding discounts for intact males Designing an implant strategy The last implant before you market the cattle is the most important Market at weaning calfhood implant will add 20-30 lb. to weaning weight (low dose estrogen) Market after backgrounding weaning implant will improve ADG 10-12%, F/G 78% (mod dose estrogen) Stocker cattle moderate dose estrogen or low dose combination Are there ever reasons not to implant stocker and feeder calves? If gains are low(<1 lb/d) 10% of 0.5 lbs is 0.05 lbs/d Niche marketing strategy such as "natural" beef When calves are sold based on carcass quality grade Strategies Thumb rule: The most important implant is the one used the last 100 days of ownership Cow-calf -- calfhood implant Background --weaning implant Stocker -- turnout implant Feedlot -- terminal or reimplant Implanted replacement heifers Will have reduced reproductive performance? Depend on many factors age at implanting plane of nutrition after implanting type of implant used Implanted at or near birth have been reduced pregnancy rates by as much as 40 percent. Estrogen and progesterone caused their uterus at 15 months of age to be lighter, less muscular, and to have a thinner lining (endometrium). Implanted replacement heifers Implanting older heifer calves has not necessarily resulted in the same severe decrease in fertility as those implanted at or near birth. Heifers implanted once between 1 and 14 months no decrease in pregnancy percentages if they were fed to gain 1.1 to 1.25 pounds per day. if the nutrition is not adequate to support this moderate rate of growth, pregnancy rates have been decreased by as much as 42 percent. Some studies have shown that implanting heifers may delay the occurrence of their first heat by one or two 21-day cycles. Is implanting economically justified in heifers? Example 100-cow herd 85 calves are weaned 42 are heifers 22 to be kept as replacements How much extra income would you receive if you implanted all the heifers? Extra gain15 lbs per heifer ($1.00 per lb) Implant cost $1.25 per hd Bottom line on implanting replacement heifers If replacement heifers are selected before implanting, implant only the ones to be sold as feeders at weaning. If backgrounding all calves then just implant at weaning and only implant those to be sold as feeders If replacement heifers are not selected before implanting Make sure heifers are implanted only if old enough (45 days of age for Synovex C; 30 days of age for Ralgro). Do not re-implant replacement heifers since this will reduce their fertility. Insure nutrition is adequate to support growth rates of at least 1.2 lb/d. Never implant breeding bulls. This can cause permanent damage to their testicles. Are there ever problems with implanting and re-implanting feeder heifers? If heifers are implanted with an estrogenic hormone shortly before weaning, and reimplanted with an estrogenic implant shortly after weaning, "estrogen stacking" may occur. Incidence of "bullers" may rise. "Bullers" are calves which are continually ridden by their pen or pasture mates, resulting in injury and even death. Using androgenic implant will can avoid the buller effect Implanting strategies for the feedlot The implant should be payed out by the time they go to the packer. Never re-implant animals before the previous implant is payed out Response to Implants (Younger Steers) Comparison of Estrogen 25% reimplant (E/E), Combination reimplant 20% (ET/ET) and delayed implant (C/ET) vs 15% Controls Equally treated 10% comparisons as part of a 7-trial ISU summary 5% ADG F/G 0% E/E ET/ET C/ET Response to Implants (Yearling Steers) How much gain is 20% if gaining 3.5lbs/d for 100 days? ET/ET ET E/E ADG F/G E Comparison of Estrogen 25% (E), Estrogen Reimplant 20% (E/E), Combination (ET) 15% and Combination reimplant(ET/ET) vs 10% controls 5% Equally treated comparisons as part of a 7- 0% trial ISU summary Return for feedlot producers $5 return above the cost of the implant can be expected for each $1 price of a bushel of corn. Adding androgen to an estrogen implant system will return an additional $2 above the cost of the implant for each $1 price of a bushel of corn. If corn cost $5/bu An estrogenic implant return would =$25 Combination would return would =$35 The Normal Growth Curve Management for more rapid growth changes the shape Muscle Growth Fat Growth Weight at 28% Body Fat Frame Size 1 2 3 4 Steer 882 954 1029 1102 1175 1250 1322 1395 1470 Heifer 705 763 824 882 5 939 6 7 8 9 1001 1058 1115 1177 Implants as a Growth Management Tool Importance will increase with “Value-based” Marketing Aggressive Implant Programs for: Early-maturing, small ribeye, small carcasses Calf-fed British, heifers No implant for: Super-large, older cattle Potential over 900# carcasses Implant timing may be the most important decision Effect of Implants on Performance and Marbling (50+ Trial Summary) None Estrogen E/TBA Initial Wt 780 776 784 Final Wt 1153 1216 1238 ADG 2.88 3.39 3.56 F/G 6.81 6.26 6.03 %Ch/Pr 64 56 54 DiCostanzo, U. of Minn Cost of Gain with Low Feed ($85/T) and High Feed ($240/T) Feed COG Low Feed Feed COG High Feed Total COG Low Feed Total COG High Feed None Estrogen E/TBA $29 $27 $26 $82 $75 $72 $43 $39 $37 $96 $87 $83 Select Discount ($ per head) Estrogen E/TBA 20% lower percent Choice Low spread ($5) $3 $4 $8 High spread ($20 $12 $16 $31 Return to Implants with Variable Feed Prices and Select Discounts $60.00 $50.00 $40.00 Lo Feed-Lo QG Lo Feed-Hi QG Hi Feed-Hi QG Hi Feed-Lo QG $30.00 $20.00 $10.00 $0.00 -$10.00 Estrogen E/TBA QG wreck