Fabrication of an Implant-Retained Partial Denture By Michael du Preez In partial fulfilment of BTech: Dental Technology Contents History Clinical Treatment Plan Possible Technical Treatment Plan Treatment Option of Choice Laboratory Procedures Final Placement References History 13 year-old Swelling in left area of mandible Possible malignant tumor History Tumor removed Juvenile ossifying fibroma History Mandibular bone loss Dentition loss History Reconstruction Plate Two premolars and three molars remained History Fibula free flap Segment of fibula is removed History Part of reconstruction plate removed History • Fibula is removed • Formed and attached15 History Reconstructed Mandible Stabilized with plates and screws Clinical Treatment Plan What type of implant? What can be performed with available bone? How many implants? Clinical Treatment Plan Advantages • Bone stabilization12&9 • Retrievability • Improvement of function13 • Psychological improvement10 Disadvantages • Risk of screw loosening11 • Length of treatment plan11 • Multiple surgery • Cost Clinical Treatment Plan Biocompatible titanium Implant Abutment Clinical Treatment Plan Implant is screwed or tapped in the bone14&8 Tissue sutured closed Clinical Treatment plan • Tissue over implant removed14 Abutment is placed on implant14&8 Selected attachment placement14 Possible Technical Treatment Plan Bar attachment2&7 2 to 6 implants needed14 Support denture14 Relieves tissue14 Best suited for cases of severe bone loss14 Possible Technical Treatment Plan Ball and socket attachment3&14 2 to 4 implants needed14 Better suited for lower14 denture Simplest way14 Ball type insert fits in o-ring type attachments14 Possible Technical Treatment Plan Screw-in fixed bridge14 4-8 implants needed14 Non-removable14 Need sufficient bone14 Possible Technical Treatment Plan Cemented fixed bridge14 4-10 implants needed14 Natural appearance14 Easy to clean14 Possible Technical Treatment Plan Magnetic attachment1&3 2 to 3 implants needed14 Magnetic keeper heads connected to abutments6 Magnetic units incorporated in the denture6 Treatment Option Of Choice Bar attachment2&14 Most suitable2 Less expensive than cemented fixed bridge14 Less trauma on tissue14 Mechanical retention4 Best suited for cases of sever bone loss14 Laboratory Procedures Surgical Stent4 Guides and indicate implant position4 Critical factor for ideal surgical and aesthetic results5 Laboratory Procedures • Preliminary impression2 Special Tray fabrication2 Master Cast Laboratory Procedures Custom record blocks Wax setup Fabrication of bar attachment Processing and finishing of denture Laboratory Procedures Final product 14 Clips incorporated in denture14 Bar attachment on the implants14 Final Placement Speech Aesthetics Mastication Self-Esteem Thank you References 1.Babbush C.A. Dental Implants, The Art And Science, London, W.B. Saunders Company, 2001:243-247. 2.Hobo S. Ichide, E. Garcia, L.T. Osseointegration and Occlusal Rehabilitation, Tokyo, Quintessence Publishing Company, 1990:153-207. 3.Jamanez-Lopez V. Oral Rehabilitation with Implant Supported Prostheses, Tokyo, Quintessence Publishing Company, 1998:269-273. 4.White G.E. Osseointegrated Dental Technology, Tokyo, Quintessence Publishing Company,1993:31-43. References 5.Taylor D. Clinical Maxillofacial Prosthetics, Tokyo, Quintessence Publishing Company, 2000: 189-203. 6.The Journal of oral impantology,vol12 no.1,1985,436-441 7.D’ Angelo J. Dr. Joseph D’ Angelo , www.joethedentist.com, date accessed: 15 September 2004. 8.www.cunj.org, date accessed: 10 September 2004 9.www.microsurgeon.org, 2004, date accessed 15 September 2004 10.www.drshanaman.com, date accessed 10 September 2004 11.www.barryhenbestdds.com, date accessed 10 September 2004 12.Davidoff S.R. The Dental Implant Homepage, www.dentalimplants.com, date accessed 7 September 2004 References 13.www.dental-implants.co.uk, date accessed 10 September 14.The dental implant projects, www.implant4you.com, date accessed 10 September 2004 15.www.ufhscj.edu, date accessed 9 September 2004