Geraint Williams (Cardiff) - Virtual Pathology at the University of Leeds

advertisement

Assessment of

Adenomas

Geraint Williams

Pathology Department

Cardiff University

The great majority of lesions in the

Screening Programme are small adenomas and hyperplastic polyps

Recognising adenomas

Categorising adenomas

Invasion

Completeness of Excision

Serrated lesions

Recognising adenomas

Categorising adenomas

Invasion

Completeness of Excision

Serrated lesions

Size

Villousness Dysplasia

Frequency of Carcinoma in

Adenomas

< 1 cm

1-2 cm

> 2 cm

1479 1.3%

580 9.5%

430 46.0%

Muto et al 1975

Frequency of Carcinoma in

Adenomas tubular tubulovillous villous

1875 4.7%

380 22.4%

234 41.9%

Muto et al 1975

Frequency of Carcinoma in

Adenomas mild dysplasia moderate dysplasia severe dysplasia

1734 5.7%

549 18.0%

223 34.5%

Muto et al 1975

High Risk (‘Advanced’)

Adenomas

> 1 cm villous component severe dysplasia

As long as there is no invasive malignancy and excision is complete -

No worries!

Rectosigmoid Adenoma Follow-Up

1618 patients followed for a mean of 14 years after removal of rectosigmoid adenomas:

49 (3%) developed colorectal cancer:

14 rectal SIR 1.2 (CI 0.7-2.1)

(11/14 had incompletely excised adenomas)

35 colonic SIR 2.1 (CI 1.5-3.0)

Atkin et al 1992

Risk of Subsequent Colon Cancer tubular 1 tubulovillous 3.8

villous 5.0

mild 1.3

moderate 3.4

severe 3.3

<1 cm

1-2 cm

>2 cm

1.5

2.2

5.9

1 tumour 1.7

>2 tumours 4.8

Risk of Subsequent Colon Cancer

Patients Cancers SIR

Low Risk Adenomas

Single

Multiple

Total

712

64

776

4

0

4

0.6

0

0.5

High Risk Adenomas

Single

Multiple

Total

683

159

842

20

11

31

2.9

6.6

3.6

Advanced Adenoma Patients

> 1 cm villous component severe dysplasia multiple polyps

Risk of Advanced Neoplasia 5.5yrs

No neoplasia

Tubular Adenoma <10mm

1-2

3+

Tubular Adenoma >10mm

Villous Adenoma

High Grade Dysplasia

Carcinoma

Patients Ad Neo

298 7

622

496

38

23

126

123

81

46

23

15

19

13

8

8

Lieberman et al 2007

RR

1

2.56

1.92

5.01

6.40

6.05

6.87

13.56

Even if there is no invasive malignancy and excision is complete -

Grading of dysplasia and assessment of villousness in adenomas that are

<10mm will govern surveillance

So we’ve got to try hard to get it right!

Grading Dysplasia in 2189

Adenomas at 13 Centres mild moderate severe min max median

29% 88% 42%

10% 67% 43%

1% 24% 4%

Low grade and high grade

High Grade Dysplasia

Expected in <5% of all adenomas

Equates to ‘intramucosal adenocarcinoma’

Involves more than 1-2 glands

High Grade Dysplasia

Recognition based primarily on ARCHITECTURE :

COMPLEX glandular crowding and irregularity

PROMINENT budding

CRIBRIFORM ‘back-to-back’ glands

INTRALUMINAL papillary tufting

Low power diagnosis - epithelium is thick, blue, disorganised and ‘dirty’

High Grade Dysplasia

CYTOLOGY :

Loss of polarity and nuclear stratification

Markedly enlarged nuclei

Atypical mitoses

Prominent apoptosis

Usually more than one of these

Histology of 2206 Adenomas at

13 Centres tubular tubulovillous villous min max median

62% 93% 84%

6%

0%

37%

6%

15%

1%

Reproducibility of Identifying

Villousness

– 3 observers

– Overall agreement 61%

Jensen et al 1995

Tubulovillous Adenomas

The 20% Rule

Neoplastic Villi

Classical

Palmate

Foreshortened

May have prominent low grade mucinous epithelium

Flat Adenomas

– thickness does not exceed twice that of adjacent mucosa

– more often right sided

– usually small (<1cm) with tubular growth pattern

– more often high grade dysplasia

– 40% contain carcinoma

– uncommon because no chromoendoscopy

Muto et al 1985

National Polyp Study

• 1418 patients

• Complete colonoscopy with removal of adenomas

• No special attempt to identify flat adenomas

• Follow up colonoscopy, mean 5.9 years

• 97% clinical follow up, 80% colonoscopies

• 8401 patient years

National Polyp Study

• 90% reduction in colorectal cancer incidence

• all five colorectal cancers found on follow-up were polypoid

Macroscopic Examination &

Trimming of Polyps

• Size - to nearest millimetre in formalin fixed specimen (whole polyps)

• Polypoid lesions

• Fixed intact

• Bisect through stalk if <10mm

• If larger, trim to leave central intact stalk

• At least three levels of stalk

• Sessile lesions pinned out and all-embedded after inking margins

Serrated Lesions

Hyperplastic polyp

Serrated adenoma

Mixed polyp

Sessile serrated polyp

Serrated carcinoma

Hyperplastic Polyps

• Formerly metaplastic polyps

• Left > right

• Male > female

• Infolded epithelial tufts and enlarged goblet cells

• No dysplasia

• Failure of anoikis (shedding of mature cells)

Ki-67

Hyperplastic Polyp

Increase in frequency with age

17 times commoner in colons with carcinoma

Similar dietary and lifestyle risk factors to CRC

K-ras mutation common

Clonal

Monocryptal?

Serrated Adenoma

Dysplasia by definition

Eosinophilic cytoplasm

Pseudostratified, ‘pencillate’ nuclei

May be tubular, tubulovillous or villous

Invade to give serrated carcinoma

Longacre & Fenoglio-Preiser 1990

‘Traditional’ Serrated adenoma (TSA)

Mixed Polyps

Collision between hyperplastic polyp and adenoma

Dysplasia in Hyperplastic Polyp

Longacre & Fenoglio-Preiser 1990

Sessile Serrated Polyp

(Adenoma)

• Serrated polyps with unusual architectural features

• No conventional dysplasia but may have

‘nuclear atypia’ or ‘hypermucinous’ change

• Right colon

• Females > males

• Large sessile, poorly defined

Torlakovic & Snover 1996

Sessile serrated polyp

Serrated Adenocarcinoma

• Serrated, mucinous or trabecular growth pattern

• Abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm

• Chromatin condensation

• Preserved polarity

• No necrosis

Tuppurainen K et al 2005 J Pathol 207: 285-94

Tuppurainen K et al 2005 J Pathol 207: 285-94

Serrated Neoplasia

Microsatellite instability

DNA methylation

MLH1 inactivation

BRAF mutation

Baker K et al J Clin Pathol 2004; 57: 1089

BRAF mutation

• Typical adenomas 0%

• Typical hyperplastic polyps

• Sessile serrated adenomas

19-78%

75-78%

• Traditional serrated adenomas 20-66%

• Mixed Polyps

• HNPCC cancers

• All colorectal cancers

57-89%

0%

15%

• MSI-high non-HNPCC cancers 76%

Serrated Neoplasia Pathway

Proximal hyperplastic polyp

Sessile serrated polyp

Serrated adenoma

MSI-high, methylation-rich non-HNPCC

“serrated” carcinoma (50% mucinous)

Higuchi T & Jass JR 2004 J Clin Pathol 57: 682

1250 Polyps at Colonoscopy

Polyp Dysplasia %

Adenoma Tubular

Tubulovillous

Villous

Serrated Hyperplastic polyps

-

Sessile Serrated Polyp -

Mixed Polyp

Serrated Adenoma

+

+

+

+

+

55

15

1

24.5

2.5

0.8

1.2

NBCSP

Hyperplastic polyp

Serrated adenoma

Mixed polyp

Sessile serrated polyp

Serrated carcinoma

Download