Particulate Control-2 Fabric Filters Particulate Scrubbers Lecture notes adapted from Prof. Dr. Dentel Notes and Prof. Dr. Chang-Yu Wu Fabric Filters • Well known and accepted method for separating dry particles from a gas stream • Many different types of fabrics, different ways of configuring bags in a baghouse and different ways of flowing the air through the bags. • There are 3 common types of baghouse based on cleaning method – Reverse-air – Shaker – Pulse-jet Fabric Filters Fabric Filters A shaker baghouse Filter compartements Fabric Filters Fabric Filters Filtration Theory Filtration Theory Filtration Theory Figure 6.2 pp 186 Filtration Theory Filtration Theory Design Considerations Cleaning Cycles • tf: time interval between two cleanings of the same compartment • tr: time interval between cleanings of any two compartment Variation of pressure drop with time DPm DP tr tc Time Cleaning Cycles Maximum Filtering Velocities in Shaker or Reverse Air Baghouses Dusts Max. Filtering V (ft/min) Activated charcoal, carbon black, detergents, metal fumes 1.5 Aluminum oxide, carbon, fertilizer, graphite, iron ore, lime, 2 paint pigments, fly ash, dyes Aluminum, clay, coke, charcoal, cocoa, lead oide, mica soap, sugar, talc 2.25 Bauxite,ceramics,chorme ore, feldsapr, blour, flint, glass, gypsum, plastics, cement 2.5 Asbestos, limestone, quartz, silica 2.75 Cork, feeds and grain, marble, oyster shell, salt 3-3.25 Leather, paper, tobacco, wood 3.5 • Table 6.1 Fabric Selection Fabric Max Temp, C Acid resistance Base resistance Dynel 71 Good Good Cotton 82 Poor Good Wool 93 Good Poor Nylon 93 Poor Good Polypropylene 93 Excellent Excellent Orlon 127 Good Fair Dacron 135 Good Fair Teflon 204 Excellent Excellent Glass 288 Good Good Table 6.2 Pulse Jet Filters • Introduced 45 years ago captured one-half of the industrial air filtration market • Air is filtered through the bags from outside to the inside, a cage inside each bag prevents the bag from collapsing • The bags are cleaned by short blast of high pressure air (90-100 psi) • Each bag is pulsed every few minutes • On stream use Pulse Jet Filters • There are no compartments and thus no extra bags which reduces size and cost (for a large coal-fired power plant, the baghouse is so large that it is designed with separate compartments) • Since bags are placed from the top, no need to provide walkways between rows of bags (reducing the size) • Felted fabrics can be used at much higher air to cloth ratio (higher filtering velocities) Pulse Jet Filters • Table 6.5. Maximum Filtering Velocities for Various Dust or Fumes Dusts or Fumes Maximum Filtering Velocity (ft/min) Carbon, Graphite, Metallurgical Fumes, Soap, Detergents;Zinc oxide 5-6 Cement (Raw), Clay (Green), Plastics, paitn Pigments, Starch, Sugar, Wood, Gypsum, Zinc 7-8 Aluminum oxide, cement (finished), Clay (vitrifies), Lime, Limestone, Mica,Quartz, soybean, Talc 9-11 Cocoa, Cholocate,Flour,Grains, Leather Dust, Sawdust,tobacco 12-14 Advantages Disadvantages Example Example Example Other Considerations • Temperature and Humidity : Fabrics have different maximum allowable teperatures. Low T can cause condensation of acid and/or blinding of the fabric with wet dust • Chemical nature of gas: Different fabrics hav different resistance to acisd or alkalies • Fire/explosion: Some fabric are flammable; Some dust are explosive • Dust Handling: dust removal rate, conveyor system, and hopper slope should all be considered Wet Scrubbers Particulate Scrubbers Reading: Chap. 7 • Types of scrubbers: spray chamber and venturi scrubber • Theory and design consideration • Pressure drop • Contacting power 2015/4/8 Aerosol & Particulate Research Lab 29 Collecting medium: Liquid drops Wetted surface Recirculated water Spray Chamber Water to settling basin and recycle pump Vertical spray chamber (countercurrent flow) 2015/4/8 Aerosol & Particulate Research Lab 30 2015/4/8 Aerosol & Particulate Research Lab 31 Cyclone Spray Chamber & Impingement Scrubber Flagan & Seinfeld, Fundamental of Air Pollution Engineering, 1988 2015/4/8 Aerosol & Particulate Research Lab 32 Venturi Scrubber High efficiency even for small particles QL/QG: 0.001 - 0.003 VG: 60 - 120 m/s Handbook of Air Pollution Control Engineering & Technology, Mycock, McKenna & Theodore, CRC Inc., 1995. 2015/4/8 Aerosol & Particulate Research Lab 33 Theory: Spray Chamber Volume of each droplet d 6 d d3 Total number of droplets that pass the chamber per second QL QL 6QL Nd 3 d d 3 d d d 6 VG QL: volumetric liquid flow rate Droplet concentration in the chamber Nd 6QL nd 3 AcVd d d AcVd Vd Vtd Vd Vtd VG Vd: droplet falling velocity relative to a fixed coordinate Vtd: droplet terminal settling velocity in still air (i.e. relative to the gas flow) 2015/4/8 Aerosol & Particulate Research Lab 34 At a given time dt, the distance a droplet falls is dz Vd dt Volume of air that flows through the cross-section area of a single droplet during the time dt Vair, single 2 2 Vtd d d Vtd dt d d dz 4 4 Vd Total effective volume of gas swept clean per second by all droplets in dz d d2 Vtd 6QL Vair,all d dz 3 d d 4 Vd Total number of particles swept clean per second by all droplets in dz d d2 Vtd 6QL dN p d dz 3 n d d 4 Vd 2015/4/8 p, z Aerosol & Particulate Research Lab 35 Total number of particles removed per second over dx dN p VG Ac n p , z dz / 2 n p , z dz / 2 QL Particle penetration in a countercurrent vertical spray chamber 3QLVtd d z Pd exp 2QG d d (Vtd VG ) AdVtd d exp QG N z dz / 2 N N z z dz / 2 Cross-sectional area of all the droplets 6QL Ad Ac z 3 d d AcVd 2015/4/8 d d2 3QL z 4 2d d Vtd VG Aerosol & Particulate Research Lab QG 36 6.12104 QLVtdd z Pd exp QG d d (Vtd VG ) If QL in gal/min and QG in cfm, z in ft and dd in mm Particle penetration in a cross-flow spray chamber 3 QL d AdVtd d Pd exp z exp QG 2 QG d d Q: How do we have higher collection efficiency? Q: What are the collection mechanisms (we need it for d)? 2015/4/8 Aerosol & Particulate Research Lab 37 2015/4/8 Aerosol & Particulate Research Lab 38 Deposition of Particles on a Spherical Collector Re mG Sc G D d dVtd G mG Particle Reynolds # dp dd St Particle Schmidt # mL mG Diameter ratio Cc p d p2Vtd 18mG d d Particle Stokes # Viscosity ratio Single droplet collection efficiency d (diffusion) (interception) 2015/4/8 Aerosol & Particulate Research Lab (impaction) 39 Impaction only St d I St 0.35 2 (Impaction parameter Kp is used in textbook; Kp = 2 St) p = 2 g/cm3 Venturi Scrubber • Use intertial impaction of suspended particles on water droplet formed by gas atomization Venturi Scrubbers: Calvert Design Particle penetration through a venturi scrubber QLVG L d d Pd exp 55QG mG K po f 0.7 0.49 0.7 K po f 1.4 ln 0.7 0.7 K po f 1 K po Kpo=2St (aerodynamic diameter) using throat velocity f = 0.5 for hydrophilic materials, 0.25 for hydrophobic materials Atomization produces a wide distribution of droplet size. However using the Sauter mean droplet diameter (dd) equation can be solved with satisfactory results. 0.5 mL 597 0.5 L k1 = 58600 if VG is in cm/s = 1920 if VG is in ft/s k1 dd VG 2015/4/8 L 0.45 1.5 QL 1000 QG in dyne/cm, L in g/cm3 and m should be in poise QL and QG should be of the same unit 42 Pressure Drop Venturi Scrubber QL Dp k V QG 2 L G k 2(1 X 2 X 4 X 2 ) 3lt C Dd G X 1 16d d L lt: venturi throat length X: dimensionless throat length Ex: 10” water, 2 mm, = ? 2015/4/8 Aerosol & Particulate Research Lab 43 Contacting Power Approach When compared at the same power consumption, all scrubbers give the same degree of collection of a given dispersed dust, regardless of the mechanisms involved and regardless of whether the pressure drop is obtained by high gas flow rate or high water flow rate 1 exp( Nt ) Nt: Number of transfer unit (unitless) Nt PT (PT :contacting power in hp / 1000 cfm) and : coefficient and exponent of PT PT should be determined from the friciton loss across the wetted portion of the scrubber. 44 Contacting Power Approach Venturi scrubber collecting a metallurgical fume Contacting power, hp/cfm Example Q: Tests of a venturi scrubber show the results listed on the right. Estimate the contacting power required to attain 97% efficiency. Friction loss (in H2O) (%) 12.7 56 38.1 89 1 exp( Nt ) Nt: Number of transfer unit (unitless) Nt PT (PT contacting power in hp / 1000 acfm) (1 inch of water = 0.1575 hp/1000 cfm) Example Convert friction loss to contacting power (hp/1000 cfm): 1 in H20 =0.1575 hp/1000cfm Friction loss (in H2O) PT hp/1000cfm 12.7 2 38.1 6 1 exp( Nt ) Nt PT (%) Nt 56 0.821 89 2.207 97 3.506 0.821 2 ln ln 2 ln(0.821) 2.207 6 ln ln 6 ln(2.207) Example Substractin Eq A from Eq B: 0.821 2 ln ln 2 ln(0.821) 2.207 6 ln ln 6 ln(2.207) 0.989 (ln 6 ln 2) ln(6 / 2) 0.90 2.207 0.90 0.44 6 Nt PT 3.506 0.44P 0.90 T PT 10hp / 1000cfm A B 2015/4/8 Aerosol & Particulate Research Lab 49 Problem 7.1 Solution St St 0.35 2 St d I Cc p d p2Vtd 18mG d d Impaction parameter Kp is used in textbook d a2 K P 2St 2 Cc p d p2Vtd 18mG d d Cc p d p2Vtd 9mG d d d p2 p pw wd a2Vtd 9mG d d Determine the density of water and the viscosity of the air at 80 °F from Appendix B 3QLVtd d z Pd exp 2QG d d (Vtd VG ) Solution 3QLVtd d z Pd exp 2QG d d (Vtd VG ) Solution St d I St 0.35 2