MSD_2012_003_-_Wageningen-van_-_MSc_

advertisement

DESIGN ANALYSIS for a

SMALL SCALE ENGINE

b y T i m v a n W a g e n in gen

Contents

- Motivation

- Concepts

- Performance Analysis

- Conclusions

- Questions

2 MOTIVATIONS -

CONCEPTS

PERFORMANCE I / II / III

-

CONCLUSIONS

± 40 min

N a t u r e small

Atalanta project

Technology

3 MOTIVATIONS -

CONCEPTS

PERFORMANCE I / II / III

-

CONCLUSIONS scale → large

Micro Air Vehicle

Flapping Wing Mechanism

- Designed by Casper Bolsman

- 0.6 gram

- Performance estimate:

- 0.5 W power output

- Needed power density of system: 125 W/kg

- 6 minutes of flight time with

5% efficiency

4 MOTIVATIONS -

CONCEPTS

PERFORMANCE I / II / III

-

CONCLUSIONS

MAV in Action

5 MOTIVATIONS -

CONCEPTS

PERFORMANCE I / II / III

-

CONCLUSIONS

Hydrogen Peroxide

- Master thesis of Arjan Meskers at the PME department, TU Delft

- Chemical energy: high energy density

- Monopropellant

- Clean products: oxygen and water vapor

- Example catalysts: -Manganese oxide

-Silver

-Platinum

6 MOTIVATIONS -

CONCEPTS

PERFORMANCE I / II / III

-

CONCLUSIONS

Catalytic Reaction in Action

7 MOTIVATIONS -

CONCEPTS

PERFORMANCE I / II / III

-

CONCLUSIONS

Thesis Assignment

Find an engine concept that:

- is suitable for the MAV

- 125 W/kg

- 5% efficiency

- uses hydrogen peroxide as fuel

8 MOTIVATIONS -

CONCEPTS

PERFORMANCE I / II / III

-

CONCLUSIONS

Possibilities

9

MOTIVATIONS

CONCEPTS -

PERFORMANCE I / II / III

-

CONCLUSIONS

+

+

Turbine

3 different approaches

Piston Cylinder

+ +

+

10

MOTIVATIONS

CONCEPTS -

PERFORMANCE I / II / III

-

CONCLUSIONS

+

+

Concept I: Tesla Turbine Engine

+ Easy implementation

+ Theory of Tesla Turbine predicts good efficiency at small scale

- Conversion from rotation to linear motion

11

MOTIVATIONS

CONCEPTS -

PERFORMANCE I / II / III

-

CONCLUSIONS

+

+

Concept I: Tesla Turbine Engine

12

MOTIVATIONS

CONCEPTS -

PERFORMANCE I / II / III

-

CONCLUSIONS

+

Concept II: Otto Engine

+ Proven concept on regular scale

- Projects in literature show bad performance because of fluid leakage problem

- Implementation difficult

13

MOTIVATIONS

CONCEPTS -

PERFORMANCE I / II / III

-

CONCLUSIONS

Concept II: Otto engine

+

14

MOTIVATIONS

CONCEPTS -

PERFORMANCE I / II / III

-

CONCLUSIONS

Concept III: Hot Air Engine

+

+

+ Easy implementation

+ Promising scaling aspects because heat transfer is more effective

- Poor performance on regular scale

15

MOTIVATIONS

CONCEPTS –

PERFORMANCE I / II / III

-

CONCLUSIONS

Concept III: Hot Air Engine

+

+

16

MOTIVATIONS

CONCEPTS -

PERFORMANCE I / II / III

-

CONCLUSIONS

Performance

- What influences the performance of these concepts?

- Concept I

- Concept II

- Concept III

- Are the concepts suited for the MAV?

-Power density

-Efficiency

17

MOTIVATIONS

-

CONCEPTS

PERFORMANCE I

/ II / III

-

CONCLUSIONS

Concept I: Tesla Turbine Engine

18

MOTIVATIONS

-

CONCEPTS

PERFORMANCE I

/ II / III

-

CONCLUSIONS

Concept I: Tesla Turbine Engine: model

Assumptions:

Laminar flow

No entrance effects

Incompressible fluid

19

MOTIVATIONS

-

CONCEPTS

PERFORMANCE I

/ II / III

-

CONCLUSIONS

Power Efficiency

Pressure difference

Length of belts

(radius of discs)

Height of gap

(spacing between discs)

20

MOTIVATIONS

-

CONCEPTS

PERFORMANCE I

/ II / III

-

CONCLUSIONS

Measurements with small scale Tesla turbines

Pressure difference:

~20 kPa

Measured Performance

45 mW

18% efficiency

Estimated power density:

2 W/kg

[2] V.G. Krishnan et al. A micro Tesla turbine for power generation from low pressure heads and evaporation driven flows. Transducers, 11:1851 – 1854, June 2011.

21

MOTIVATIONS

-

CONCEPTS

PERFORMANCE I

/ II / III

-

CONCLUSIONS

Concept I, Tesla Turbine Engine: conclusions

- Power density is too low: pressure difference must be increased considerably

- Simple model + measurements show that TTE is not suitable for the current size MAV

22

MOTIVATIONS

-

CONCEPTS

PERFORMANCE I

/ II / III

-

CONCLUSIONS

Concept II: Otto Engine

23

MOTIVATIONS

-

CONCEPTS

PERFORMANCE

I /

II

/ III

-

CONCLUSIONS

Concept II, Otto Engine: combining 3 models

Catalytic

Reaction

+

Exhaust

Flow

+

Heat

Loss

24

MOTIVATIONS

-

CONCEPTS

PERFORMANCE

I /

II

/ III

-

CONCLUSIONS

Catalytic Reaction: model

Drop on a catalytic surface

Similar conditions as during experiments

Energy Balance:

25

MOTIVATIONS

-

CONCEPTS

PERFORMANCE

I /

II

/ III

-

CONCLUSIONS

Catalytic Reaction: model

[1] A.J.H. Meskers. High energy density micro-actuation based on gas generation by means of catalyst of liquid chemical energy. Masters thesis, TU Delft, 2010.

26

MOTIVATIONS

-

CONCEPTS

PERFORMANCE

I /

II

/ III

-

CONCLUSIONS

Catalytic Reaction: high fuel concentrations

27

MOTIVATIONS

-

CONCEPTS

PERFORMANCE

I /

II

/ III

-

CONCLUSIONS

Exhaust Flow: model

Compressible flow through a round nozzle

Based on momentum equation

28

MOTIVATIONS

-

CONCEPTS

PERFORMANCE

I /

II

/ III

-

CONCLUSIONS

Heat transfer

Heat is transferred via

-conduction

-convection

-radiation

29

MOTIVATIONS

-

CONCEPTS

PERFORMANCE

I /

II

/ III

-

CONCLUSIONS

+

Concept II, Otto Engine: combining models

+ =

- Dealing with model uncertainties:

30

MOTIVATIONS

-

CONCEPTS

PERFORMANCE

I /

II

/ III

-

CONCLUSIONS

Otto Engine: observations

-Reaction times are fast enough

-Trade off for fuel used per cycle

-Condensation in cylinder

31

MOTIVATIONS

-

CONCEPTS

PERFORMANCE

I /

II

/ III

-

CONCLUSIONS

Concept II, Otto Engine:

Results

- Model shows performance above the current requirements of the

MAV

(125 W/kg @ 5% efficiency)

32

MOTIVATIONS

-

CONCEPTS

PERFORMANCE

I /

II

/ III

-

CONCLUSIONS

Concept II, Otto Engine: considerations

- Model neglects:

- fluid leakage through cylinder/piston gap

- fluid friction at exhaust

- fuel delivery system

- Condensation in cylinder problem needs to be addressed

33

MOTIVATIONS

-

CONCEPTS

PERFORMANCE

I /

II

/ III

-

CONCLUSIONS

Concept III: Hot Air Engine

34

MOTIVATIONS

-

CONCEPTS

PERFORMANCE

I / II /

III -

CONCLUSIONS

Concept III, Hot Air Engine: models

Catalytic

Reaction

Heat

Reservoirs

Heat

Loss

+ +

35

MOTIVATIONS

-

CONCEPTS

PERFORMANCE

I / II /

III -

CONCLUSIONS

Concept III, Hot Air Engine:

Catalytic Reaction

Constant temperature

Mass balance

36

MOTIVATIONS

-

CONCEPTS

PERFORMANCE

I / II /

III -

CONCLUSIONS

Schematic

Concept III, Hot Air Engine:

Heat Reservoirs

Under reversible conditions

Estimate for heat transfer rates

- Using definition

Fouriers law

-Optimistic and pessimistic value

37

MOTIVATIONS

-

CONCEPTS

PERFORMANCE

I / II /

III -

CONCLUSIONS

+

Model Results

+ =

Resulting performance of model

38

MOTIVATIONS

-

CONCEPTS

PERFORMANCE

I / II /

III -

CONCLUSIONS

Considerations for

Small Scale Hot Air Engine

- Model neglects losses of

- fluid flow between piston cylinder gap

- heat leakage of Decomposition Unit to the working fluid

39

MOTIVATIONS

-

CONCEPTS

PERFORMANCE

I / II /

III -

CONCLUSIONS

Conclusions for

Small Scale Hot Air Engine

- Heat transfer is not yet fast enough on this scale, which results in low performance

- Concept III is not suited for the MAV

40

MOTIVATIONS

-

CONCEPTS

PERFORMANCE

I / II /

III -

CONCLUSIONS

Overall Conclusions

- Of the considered possibilities, the small scale Otto engine is the best option for the MAV:

Power density at 5% efficiency:

Concept 1: << 2 W/kg

Concept 2: 245 – 440 W/kg

Concept 3: 0.5 – 8 W/kg

41

MOTIVATIONS

-

CONCEPTS

-

PERFORMANCE I / II / III

CONCLUSIONS

Overall Conclusions

Actual implementation of concept II requires more detailed analysis:

- Solving the fluid leakage problem

- Fuel pump

-Exhaust port

-Condensation

42

MOTIVATIONS

-

CONCEPTS

-

PERFORMANCE I / II / III

CONCLUSIONS

Thank

You!

43

MOTIVATIONS

-

CONCEPTS

-

PERFORMANCE I / II / III

-

CONCLUSIONS

- END

Detailed slides

44 DETAILED SLIDES

Scaling?

Scaling factor

Length

Area

Volume

16 PERFORMANCE

Engine 1

S = 1

L = 10

A = 10

V = 10

Engine 2

S = 0.5

L = 5

A = 2.5

V = 1.25

Approach of others?

6 PREMILAIRY RESEARCH

7 PREMILAIRY REASEARCH

Possibilities

Pressure difference

Length of belts

(radius of disks)

Height of gap

(spacing between disks)

40 PERFORMANCE

Power Efficiency

Energy flow in concepts

Carnot cycle =

7 CONCEPTS

Carnot Cycle

8 PERFORMANCE zero power output!

9 PERFORMANCE

Curzon Ahlborn Cycle

10 PERFORMANCE

Curzon Ahlborn Cycle

ND Curzon Ahlborn Cycle

11 PERFORMANCE

Basic thermodynamic engine model

- Two constant temperature reservoirs:

- Energy flows modeled with

Fouriers law of heat conduction:

-Carnot cycle between the working fluid temperatures:

17 PERFORMANCE

ND Curzon Ahlborn Cycle

18 PERFORMANCE

19 PERFORMANCE

Scaling of performance

Intermediate Conclusions

Efficiency of engine is independent of scale, if the cycle time is adjusted correctly

- Optimal power output can be found by finding the optimal cycle time

- Assuming an optimal engine configuration:

20 PERFORMANCE

12 PERFORMANCE

Energy Balance Model

13 PERFORMANCE

Energy Balance Model

14 PERFORMANCE

Energy Balance Model

Scaling of optimal cycle time concept 3 pessi opti

13 PERFORMANCE

Heat transfer

- Heat is transferred via

-conduction

-convection

-radiation

- FEM model in COMSOL

16 DETAILS

Heat transfer: FEM model results

16 DETAILS

Heat transfer: facts for MAV engine

- Low Biot number situations: not much use for insulation.

- Difficult to maintain a temperature difference within the system

- Loss term scaling exponent = 1.5

16 DETAILS

Intermediate Conclusions

- The performance of depends on a potential and the utilization

- Utilization is independent of scale

- How does this apply to the concepts?

15 PERFORMANCE

Catalytic Reaction: fundamentals

- Decomposition rate proportional to the effective contact area between fuel and catalyst

- Large Damköhler number: rate temperature independent

- First order reaction:

16 DETAILS

Exhaust Flow: model

Flow through a nozzle

Based on momentum equation

Neglects friction

32 DETAILS

33 DETAILS

Exhaust Flow: characteristics

Model Results: scaling

Assuming unrestricted cycle time!

24 PERFORMANCE

What about scaling?

Catalytic Reaction: Fluid Flow:

Power: Power Density:

Power Density at reference scale (S=1):

Power Density when size is 10 times smaller (S=0.1):

41 PERFORMANCE

Download