Endoscopic Ultrasound: Applications in Pre-malignant and Malignant Disease December 20th, 2010 Andrew T. Pellecchia, MD Director of Advanced Endoscopy Jacobi Medical Center EUS Originally utilized to ‘clear’ the bile duct precholecystectomy in patients with suspected CBD stones Less invasive alternative to ERCP Risks similar to standard EGD EUS still used for this indication Less than 20% of EUS procedures are performed for this indication in established advanced endoscopy center Evolution of EUS EUS as an imaging study EUS as a means of fluid and tissue acquisition Cancer staging Cyst analysis EUS as an interventional/therapeutic modality Neurolysis Transmural cyst drainage Direct access to biliary system More… Overview Several illustrative EUS cases from JMC Basic EUS principles What is ‘within reach’ of EUS +/- FNA? Brief overview of selected diseases Patient GR 62 y.o. woman with significant weight loss over the past 6 months CT a/p shows a 6 cm intra-abdominal mass EGD/EUS/FNA planned to further evaluate lesion Endosonographic Evaluation EGD showed normal gastric mucosa with evidence of mild external compression vs. submucosal lesion in the area of the gastric incisura EUS Clear demarcation of hypoechoic mass adjacent to left lobe of the liver FNA was performed GR-GIST H&E GR-GIST C-KIT (CD117) Patient DD 62 y.o. man with history of alcoholism and recurrent pancreatitis since the 1970’s, admitted to an outside hospital with jaundice MRI showed a large pancreatic head mass ERCP for biliary drainage – failed Complicated by pancreatic tail pseudocyst formation PTC with internalization - successful Patient left AMA and came to JMC EUS/FNA performed to obtain diagnosis Endosonographic Evaluation EUS Large ~30mm hypoechoic pancreatic head mass surrounding the intrapancreatic CBD with PTC drain seen within CBD Dilated PD to 5mm with evidence of chronic pancreatitis FNA performed DD- Pancreas Ca. Pap stain DD-Pancreas Ca. Pap stain Patient CE 69 y.o. man with h/o non-small cell lung cancer s/p LUL resection in 2006 who is referred after a chest CT showed new mediastinal lymphadenopathy EUS/FNA scheduled to evaluate for recurrent disease Endosonographic Evaluation EUS Suspicious lymph nodes in the aortopulmonary window, sized 6-11mm Suspicious lymph nodes in the subcarinal space, sized 6-12mm FNA performed CE-Non-small cell ca. Pap stain CE-Non-small cell ca. Pap stain Radial Ultrasonography Oblique-viewing instruments with an ultrasound transducer located at the tip The circumferential ultrasound image is perpendicular to the long axis of the endoscope Linear Ultrasonography Ultrasound image parallel to the long axis of the endoscope Capable of performing real time, ultrasound directed needle aspiration biopsy Color Doppler analysis Working End of Linear Echoendoscope The Scope of the Echoendoscope What can be assessed by EUS with potential FNA? Any structure within several cm of U/L GI tract Ability to see structures measuring 1 mm Ability to perform FNA upon structures measuring 3mm Limitations Cannot visualize beyond air-filled structures Cannot biopsy through air-filled structures, blood vessels, or the heart Lung that is non-adjacent to esophagus, trachea, aorta, pulmonary artery, r/l atria Risks of EUS FNA Pancreatitis Significant bleeding < 1:1000 Infection - rare < 1:500 Perforation < 1:100 Antibiotics for transrectal FNA or FNA of cysts Inadequate tissue 1:10 to 1:5 Can be related to pathology of lesion Cholangio, GIST Thyroid Mass FNA of Thyroid Mass Right Lower Pole Kidney Mass EUS in Pre-Malignant Disease Pancreatic Cysts PD fluid analysis Pancreatic screening in high risk populations Chronic pancreatitis Family history of pancreatic cancer Cancer syndromes Submucosal Pancreatic lesions rests Pancreatic Cystic Fluid Analysis Incidental pancreatic cysts seen in up to 20% of abdominal CT’s performed for any reason Cystic lesions of the pancreas, even when found incidentally, may represent malignant or pre-malignant lesions The majority of pancreatic cysts require evaluation by EUS/FNA FNA measurement of CEA, amylase, genetic markers Relatively sensitive and specific for differentiating mucinous cysts (IPMN, MCA) from non-mucinous cysts (SCA, Pseudocyst) HOP Serous Cystadenoma BOP Serous Cystadenoma Oncology Consult? (FNA benign: Island of normal pancreatic tissue within serous cystadenoma) Patient PS Media reports state that the actor was diagnosed with an IPMN IPMN is a pre-cancerous lesion Conclusion: the IPMN had already progressed to adenocarcinoma prior to diagnosis/resection Resected IPMNs often have foci of adenocarcinoma Lesson: ALL pancreatic cysts need to be referred for risk stratification EUS in Malignant Disease Non-small cell lung cancer Pancreatic cancer Esophageal and gastric cancer Cholangiocarcinoma Rectal adenocarcinoma Metastatic disease Lymph nodes: aortopulmonary, subcarinal, paraesophageal, celiac, intra-abdominal Left lobe of liver Left adrenal And beyond – right lobe of liver, right adrenal, ... EUS and Lung Cancer “We really do not need additional proof before EUS-FNA is considered the gold standard for invasive staging of non-small cell lung cancer and for diagnosis of posterior mediastinal lesions; there is little to lose and much to gain.” -P. Vilmann and S.S. Larsen, Eur Respir J 2005; 25: 400–401 EUS and Lung Cancer Lymph Node Stations Normal AP Window LAD at AP Window FNA at AP Window Subcarinal Space LAD in Subcarinal Space Likely Benign Abd LAD Pancreatic Mass Pancreatic Mass at CT Pancreatic Mass at CT 'Pancreatic' Mass at EUS FNA of Peri-pancreatic Mass Metastatic Leiomyosarcoma Liver Mass FNA of Liver Mass Hyperechoic Liver Masses FNA of Hyperechoic Liver Mass EUS Evaluation of Left Lobe of Liver Abdominal LAD EUS/FNA of Periportal LN Primary Target Fail… …Secondary Target Acquired (Carcinoma at FNA) Normal Left Adrenal Left Adrenal Met in NSCLC Normal GI Wall Layers Normal Esophagus and Cyst Distal Esophageal Lesion Normal Gastric Wall Layers Mucosal Lesion Mucosal Lesion Malt Lymphoma Gastric Lipoma T2 Gastric Adenocarcinoma Invasion of Muscularis With Intact Serosa T3 Gastric Cancer T1 Rectal Cancer by EUS T2 Rectal Cancer Rectal Mass at CT: T4? (Apparent invasion of uterus) Further History: Recent IUD Removal (Actinomycosis) Celiac Plexus Neurolysis Celiac Axis Key Points All patients with pancreatic cysts should have consultation for possible EUS/FNA EUS/FNA is the standard of care in the loco-regional staging of many cancers Lung Esophageal Gastric Pancreatic Cholangiocarcinoma Rectal adenocarcinoma Key Points, Continued EUS is minimally invasive Reduces need for mediastinoscopy, surgical biopsy, bronchoscopy, CT guided biopsy Reduces morbidity/mortality while reducing health care costs Appropriate Prevents cancer staging unnecessary surgical resections Identifies patients who will benefit from pre-op chemo/xrt Cutting Edge EUS Applications Role for EUS is expanding EUS placement of fiducials for radiation therapy EUS rendezvous procedure for accessing CBD EUS directed brachytherapy EUS guided hepaticogastrostomy for malignant CBD obstruction