Further MRSA bacteraemia reduction by reducing acquisition of MRSA colonisation in-hospital Julie Brooks and Graeme Jones Infection Prevention University Hospitals Southampton NHSFT Drivers to control MRSA bacteraemia Prevention of colonisation with MRSA Prevention of invasive MRSA infection Feedback and monitoring systems J a n u a ry 0 2005 M ay 2006 J u ly M ay 2007 2008 2009 1. April 2006: hand hygiene and saving lives care bundles 2. April 2007: internal targets 3. Nov 2007: low risk antibiotic policies 4. Jan 2009: universal bio-burden reduction on admission D ecem ber N ovem ber O c to b e r S e p te m b e r A ugust J u ly June M ay A p r il M a rc h F e b ru a ry 3 J a n u a ry D ecem ber N ovem ber O c to b e r S e p te m b e r A ugust J u ly June M ay A p r il M a rc h F e b ru a ry J a n u a ry D ecem ber 2 N ovem ber O c to b e r S e p te m b e r A ugust J u ly June 1 A p r il M a rc h F e b ru a ry J a n u a ry D ecem ber N ovem ber O c to b e r S e p te m b e r A ugust 2005 June 14 A p r il M a rc h F e b ru a ry J a n u a ry D ecem ber N ovem ber O c to b e r S e p te m b e r A ugust J u ly June M ay A p r il M a rc h F e b ru a ry M R S A B S I (n ) Actions to reduce MRSA bacteraemia in UHS 16 2009 12 10 4 8 6 4 2 No of Cases 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Apr-07 May-07 Jun-07 Jul-07 Aug-07 Sep-07 Oct-07 Nov-07 Dec-07 Jan-08 Feb-08 Mar-08 Apr-08 May-08 Jun-08 Jul-08 Aug-08 Sep-08 Oct-08 Nov-08 Dec-08 Jan-09 Feb-09 Mar-09 Apr-09 May-09 Jun-09 Jul-09 Aug-09 Sep-09 Oct-09 Nov-09 Dec-09 Jan-10 Feb-10 Mar-10 Apr-10 May-10 Jun-10 Jul-10 Aug-10 Sep-10 Oct-10 Nov-10 Dec-10 Jan-11 Feb-11 Mar-11 Apr-11 May-11 Jun-11 Jul-11 Aug-11 Sep-11 Oct-11 Nov-11 Dec-11 MRSA bacteraemia numbers 2007-11 SUHT MRSA BSI 2007 - 2012 2007 5 3 3 2 2011 4 5 5 4 3 3 3 3 4 2 3 2 4 2 2 1 1 1 11 1 0 Actual Cases 2 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 Trajectory 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 Linear Trend (Actual Cases) 4. Jan 2009: universal bio-burden reduction on admission 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 Combined MRSA + MSSA post-48h BSI rate is a better measure of invasive infection prevention / device care? Winchester Wexham Park Basingstoke Frimley Park Southampton IOW Portsmouth Oxford Recent MRSA bacteraemias in UHS Post-48h MRSA BSI 1. 2. 3. 4. 49y. Known MRSA +ve. Erythrodermic flare of pustular psoriasis. CVL colonisation/BSI 45y. Known MRSA +ve. Paraplegic. Communityacquired MRSA IE detected after 48h in UHS 61y. Gallstone pancreatitis requiring biliary drain. BSI on drain flush. Acquired MRSA In UHS 97y. #NOF. Global deterioration and aspiration pneumonia. Acquired MRSA In UHS Recent MRSA bacteraemias in UHS Pre-48h MRSA BSI 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Known MRSA +ve. Home TPN line infection Known MRSA +ve. CML. Infected leg ulcers Infected TKR. Acquired MRSA during rehab in community hospital AML. Hickman line infection. Acquired MRSA during recent UHS admission Osteoarthritis. Necrotising pneumonia due to PVL-MRSA acquired either in UHS or rehab unit Recent MRSA bacteraemias in UHS Of 9 MRSA BSI in 2011-12 5/9 (56%) associated with new acquisition of MRSA colonisation in UHS or associated rehabilitation facility Next control action to reduce MRSA bacteraemia is to prevent acquisition of MRSA colonisation in hospital Number of patients colonised with MRSA predicts number with MRSA BSI Review of relevant studies 100 80 MRSA BSI 60 40 20 Rsq = 0.7732 0 100 300 800 600 400 200 0 500 700 Total colonized and infected patients ia t ric N Me Va eu dic ro C in l s Tr inic cul sur e au a ar ge m l H Su ry a a & em rge O r rt ato y ho lo pa gy G ed en er Ur ics al ol M o G ed g y C yna ici a n M rdia eco e e d c lo ic Su gy G al O rg en n er Th era col y or l S og C ac ur y lin ic ge ic Su ry al O rge nc ry ol og y C a E Pa O rdi nt lli ral olo at iv Su gy e rg M er ed y ic N R es Op eu ine pi th ro ra a lo to lm gy ry ol M og ed y ic in e er G % MRSA +ve on admission screen Proportion of MRSA positive emergency admissions by admission specialty 2008-12 4.00% 3.50% Overall +ve Specialties with <100 screens excluded 2008-10 2011-12 2.00% 1.50% 1.00% 0.50% 0.00% 1.5% 0.85% 3.00% 2.50% 2008-10 2011-12 SUHT MRSA Acquisition Linear (SUHT MRSA Acquisition) Oct-11 Nov-11 Dec-11 Jun-11 Jul-11 Aug-11 Sep-11 Mar-11 Apr-11 May-11 Nov-10 Dec-10 Jan-11 Feb-11 Aug-10 Sep-10 Oct-10 Apr-10 May-10 Jun-10 Jul-10 Jan-10 Feb-10 Mar-10 Sep-09 Oct-09 Nov-09 Dec-09 Jun-09 Jul-09 Aug-09 Feb-09 Mar-09 Apr-09 May-09 Nov-08 Dec-08 Jan-09 Jul-08 Aug-08 Sep-08 Oct-08 Apr-08 May-08 Jun-08 No of Cases Acquisition of new MRSA colonisation in UHS 2008-2011 SUHT MRSA Acquisition 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 ci al & Ne rn O 11 wb o & 4 T y at ric s 8 Su rg er ed i s ... ce M ed 5 Pa ic Ca re ci en is t Ne ur os Sp e al Th or ac Ca re 7 W om en & & Cr iti c ul ar er 5 nc y va sc Ca nc 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Em er ge Ca rd io No of Cases Acquisition of new MRSA colonisation in UHS by Care Group April 2011-February 2012 48 9 11 Reducing acquisition of new MRSA colonisation within hospital Next step to reducing MRSA bacteraemia MRSA screening programme to facilitate surveillance already established Marker of good practice to reduce transmission of MDRO between patients Improvement will potentially reduce risk of healthcare transmission of other organisms of concern: MSSA GAS ESBLs Carbapenem-R coliforms Preliminary work indicates scope for improvement Implementing an enhanced MRSA surveillance programme to improve patient safety. Julie Brooks Head of Infection Prevention. Enhanced MRSA Surveillance programme Enhanced Surveillance of all new cases of MRSA acquisition Commenced April 2011 Purpose: To monitor and demonstrate compliance with practice standards and drive improvements where needed To provide assurance on compliance with the Code of Practice for Health and Adult Social Care on the Prevention and Control of Infection (particularly outcome 8.8 – criterion 7 in code of practice) Standards Reviews compliance with elements of the MRSA policy (e.g. practices to prevent transmission, risk reduction measures, decolonisation regimes) as well as isolation practice (e.g. completion of isolation risk assessment tool and with the Trust isolation target of 4 hrs, where isolation is assessed as being required). MRSA Policy Comprehensive MRSA Policy in place since 2009 detailing practice standards required. Care bundle for the Prevention and Management of MRSA (Adults) – Nov 2011 Process Clinical area visited by IPN within 48hrs of confirmed new MRSA acquisition. Surveillance undertaken and verbal feedback back to nurse in charge (important to feedback good practice as well as noncompliance) For any variance against the required practice standard: Report to the nurse in charge of the ward at time of surveillance being undertaken & document that this has occurred. Request investigation/feedback action giving a 2 week deadline for feedback. Ward/department manager to undertake investigation relating to non-compliance with practice standards and implement actions to address this. Provide formal feedback and actions to IPT. If feedback is not received within the 2 week deadline – escalation as per IPT assurance framework Outcomes No. of patients surveillance carried out on Of these patients, number acquired MRSA at UHS Q1/2 Q3/4 83 77 56 41 Prevention of Spread Standard % Compliance Prevention of Spread 1. Isolation Risk assessment completed 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 2. Isolated within 4 hrs of presumptive result Q1/2 Q3/4 3. Correct Hand Hygiene performed 4. Isolation Posters displayed 5. Chlorine Based Cleaning of isolation room 1 2 3 4 Standard 5 6 6. Contact Precautions implemented Patient Management (Prior to result) Standard: % Compliance Patient Management (prior to result) 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 1. Risk reduction measures (hibiscrub washes) commenced and documented. Q1/2 Q3/4 1 2 Standard 3 2. Additional MRSA screening undertaken following admission. 3. Additional risk reduction measures (where applicable) commenced and documented. Patient Management (post result) Standard: % Compliance Prevention of Spread (post result) 1. MRSA positive status documented in notes 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 2. Q1/2 Q3/4 Topical decolonisation (Chlorhexidine & Nasal bactroban) 3. Additional measures /options for MRSA in wounds etc (where applicable) 4. MRSA Patient held record supplied. 5. 1 2 3 4 Standard 5 6 MRSA information leaflet given to patient 6. Medical notes labelled Compliance with Care Bundle. Week Commencing 05/09/2011 12/09/2011 19/09/2011 26/09/2011 03/10/2011 10/10/2011 17/10/2011 24/10/2011 31/10/2011 07/11/2011 14/11/2011 21/11/2011 28/11/2011 05/12/2011 12/12/2011 19/12/2011 26/12/2011 02/01/2012 09/01/2012 16/01/2012 23/01/2012 30/01/2012 06/02/2012 13/02/2012 20/02/2012 27/02/2012 MRSA Surveillance Care Bundle Division C Division B Division A % All No of % All No of % All No of Elements Elements Cases Cases Elements Cases 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 50 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 50 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 100 1 0 2 0 100 3 0 2 0 1 0 0 3 0 2 100 1 0 1 0 0 100 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 60 5 0 0 100 2 0 0 67 3 0 0 1 100 1 100 2 0 100 1 100 1 0 0 100 1 100 1 0 5 0 Division D % All No of Elements Cases 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 2 100 1 100 1 0 1 100 1 100 1 0 0 50 2 0 2 0 1 0 0 2 0 1 50 2 Reporting/Monitoring & Review Weekly delivery group report – copied to Matrons, Clinical Leads and Care group Managers for action. Quarterly Matron and Care Group Clinical Lead report for Infection Prevention Committee, TEC and Trust Board) Quarterly Infection Prevention Report to TEC and Trust Board. Isolation compliance monitored as part of the CQC/Hygiene Code assurance framework. Exceptions reported to Infection Prevention Committee and Quarterly to Trust Quality Governance Steering Group. CQC Outcome 8.8 - Isolation CQC Outcome 8.8 - Isolation Metrics Target Quarter 1 Quarter 2 Quarter 3 Quarter 4 Ap - June 11 July - Sep 11 Oct - Dec 11 Jan - Mar 12 Explanation of RAG Rating Isolation newly acquired MRSA Positive patients 100% of patients with MRSA isolated within 4 hours 95%>=green, 85-94% = amber, 84%< = red 88% 72% 90% Completion of isolation risk assessments for MRSA 100% of patients that are newly acquired MRSA positive have a completed risk assessment 95%>=green, 85-94% = amber, 84%< = red 35% 68% 74%