ERM100 -- Designing an ERM Infrastructure

advertisement
Designing an ERM
Infrastructure
A Model from Healthcare
Michelle Hoppes, RN, MS, AHRMQR, DFASHRM-SVP Sedgwick HRM&PS
Grace Crickette, Chief Risk Officer, UC
Linda Epstein Esq. , Acting General Counsel, Health Management Associates, Inc.
Discussion Items
• ERM Program Design
– Internal and external review
– Identify key risk indicators
– Key Components of Successful Programs
• Healthcare Case Studies
– Focus area—acquisitions and critical event investigation
– Tools at the front line-embedding ERM
– Overcoming Barriers
• Outcomes
– Demonstrating Value Protection and Creation
2
ERM Components
Uncertainty
Management
Holistic
Approach
Value
Protection
Value
Creation
3
ERM Model and Domains
Value Protection
And Value Creation
Holistic
Approach
Operations
Clinical /
Patient
Safety
Strategic
Technology
Legal /
Regulatory
Hazard
Environment
Human
Capital
Financials
ERM
4
Checklist for Successful ERM Process
 Infrastructure/accountability
 Robust risk identification
 Accurate identification of key risk
indicators
 Metrics are actionable
 Mitigate, manage, monitor
 Defining risk appetite and risk
tolerance/capacity
 Risk domain owners-accountable
 Evaluation of internal and emerging
risks
 Early warning systems—no surprises
 Modeling to forecast risk
 Measuring TCOR and benefits
 A process not a program
 Assess risk culture regularly
 Support by board and senior
management
 Part of operational culture with
process owners and drivers
 Long term strategic view of risk
 Customized to your organization
 ERM at the front level: understanding
role in managing risk
 Risk is considered in all facets of
decision making
 Continually optimize risk strategy
 Focus on most significant
5
First Steps in ERM Infrastructure
Risk
Potential
• Current
• Emerging
• Unknown
Internal
• Assess
• Culture
• Profile
External
• Market change
• Regulatory
• Legal
6
External Market Forces
PAST PRESENT
FUTURE
first do no
harm
volume
based
value based
never events
business
intelligence
ERM model
reform
patient
safety –
national
imperative
Risk Manager as Decision Facilitator--Leader
7
Volume based
Value based
second curve
first curve
Economic Futurist
• Aligning hospitals,
physicians, and other
providers
• Utilizing evidence-based
practices to improve
quality and patient
safety
• Improving efficiency
through productivity
and financial
management
• Developing integrated
information systems
8
Reform Implications
Transformative
awakening
Most sweeping
change to health
care since Medicare
was enacted
Healthcare
Fundamentally alters
the healthcare
landscape
Demand for services
will increase
astronomically
9
The Demand – The Risk
• Boomers aging
• 33-40 million
more to be
insured
Patient
Protection Act
• Shortage of
85,000 to
96,000 doctors
by 2020
• Nursing
shortage will
exceed
800,000 by
2020
Council Grad Med
Education
Health Resource
And Service Admin
10
Economic Futurist
Core Organization Competencies
Patient
Accountablecenteredleadership
Patient
integration
Electronic
Protection
Act
and
data for PI
collaboration
Strategy in
unstable
environment
Engage
employees
full potential
Financial
stewardship –
Enterprise
Risk
Management
11
IOM – New Frontiers in Patient Safety
“Only serious when
on no pay list “
2001-2009
Central line
infections drop
63%
Cost of
Medicare
91% increase
trend next
decade
Two choices:
Spend less or
improve care
Partnership for
Patients
CMS Innovation
Center
12
Target
• $500 million
CMS Innovation Center
• 40% reduction preventable harm
• Hospital engagement contractors
•
•
•
•
•
Adverse drug reactions
CAUTI, CLABSI, VAP, VTE, SSI
Falls
OB adverse events
Readmissions
13
Healthcare Top Risks
Value based
reimbursement - PI
Healthcare reform
Patient safety and
quality HAC
prevention
Medicare fraud and
abuse
Pandemic
Environmental
Professional staff
shortages
Economy - revenue
stress
Terrorism
IT-EMR
14
Internal Assessment – Broad Categories of Review
Financial
Loss
Prevention
Clinical and
Patient Safety
Legal –
Regulatory
Acquisitions
and Mergers
Compliance
Hazard –
Environment
Strategy
Reputational
Risks
Operations
Technology
ERM
Assessment
Human Capital
15
Acquisition-Sample Due Diligence Areas
Mergers, Acquisitions, Divestitures, Joint Ventures
Clinical
• Transitions of
Financial
Human
Resources
• Stability
• Turnover
• Bond covenants
• Talent retention
• Patient safety
& recruitment
• Debt
• Payer Mix
• Access to capital
acquired
conditions-never
• Contracts
events
purchasing
• On-call
specialists
• Supply mgmt
• HIPAA
• Health Reform
• Physician
contracts
• Hospital
• Value based
• TJC
Technology
Strategic
Hazard/Operations
• EMR-hybrid
• Vision
• OSHA
• Social media
• Goal alignment
• Fire
• Vendor
• Competition
• Crisis
• CMS
care
and quality
outcomes
Legal &
Regulatory
• EPL
• Mandatory
• Comparable
benefit program
Reporting
• PSO
• Unionization
• Liabilities
• Drug diversion
• Insurance
• Disruptive
behavior
• Workers comp
• DEA license
• Broker of record
alignment
• Conflict of
• CPOE
prevention/
management
Interest
• EOC
• Security-
information
breach
• Market
potential
• Culture fit
• Access
• Storage tanks
• Back up
• Data integrity
• Managed care
ownership
16
Key Documents
Material-Documents
Target Areas
Marketing



Advertising
Warranties, guarantees
Service lines
Insurance





Coverage by line of exposure
Policy type and limits
Exclusions
Actuarial reports
Financial viability


PCE’s---all reported
Claims –loss runs by:
o
Specialty
o
Provider
o
Indemnity / expense
o
Trends
Satisfaction



Areas of excellence
Areas of exposure
Patients and staff
Regulatory



Survey, licensure, accreditation and consultants reports
Citations
Sanctions
Property -Locations





Inventory
Contracts
Access / signage
Assets
Vendors
Liabilities
17
Drill Down-Example Risk List
Technology Risks
• EMR process/stage
• IT alignment
•Connectivity
• Breach- access
•Information access
Financial Risks
• Payor / reimbursement cuts
•Expense ratio
•Rating agency
•Revenue cycle
•Bonds
•Tail coverages
•Claims—all lines
•Benefit plans
Legal / Regulatory Risks
•MMSEA compliance
•Fraud & abuse
•Anti-trust
•Privacy & security / HIPAA
•EMTALA violations
•Compliance program
•Legal environment-tort
Clinical/Operational Risk
•Readmissions
•Pressure ulcers
•Wrong-site surgery
•RFB
•SSI
•Adverse medication outcomes
•Adverse OB outcomes
•Falls
•Patient centered approach
•Pandemic outbreak
•Structured communication/handoff
•Specialty and service access
•Standardized procedures/guidelines
•OR availability
•Clinical quality scores
•Aviation/helipad
Human Capital Risks
•
Union contracts/strikes
•
Low morale/culture
•
Fatigue / long shifts
•
Turnover
•
Aging
•
Stability of leadership
•
Behavior
•
TalentQuest-retention of key staff
Strategic Risks
•
Negatively publicized event
•
Partner dependencies
•
Market share retention/growth
•
Strategic plan
•
Ambulatory reach
•
Profit capture
•
Internal controls
18
Tour-Assessment and Clinical Safety Profiling
19
High Risk Areas
High Risk Area Review and Reduction of Preventable Harm
70%
65%
60%
50%
36%
40%
30%
24%
20%
10%
10%
0%
OB
Element Compliance
ED
Overall Category Compliance
OR
Behavioral Health
Linear (Overall Category Compliance)
20
High Risk Clinical Areas-Drill Down
ED
• Chest pain bundles lacking, wait times excessive
• AMA high
• Failure to diagnose abdominal pain
OR
• OR fires
• Wrong site surgery-spines
• RFB
OB
•
•
•
•
Resuscitation of newborn intubation
EFM certification
Midwife scope
Emergency c/s timeliness and nurse deliveries
21
OB Bundles
ELECTIVE INDUCTION
AUGMENTATION
VACUUM
• Gestational age greater
than or equal to 39
weeks
• Normal fetal status (per
NICHD tiers
• Pelvic exam prior to the
start of Oxytocin
• Recognition and
management of
tachysystole
• Documentation of
estimated fetal weight
• Normal fetal status
(per NICHD tiers)
• Pelvic exam prior to
the start of Oxytocin
• Recognition and
management of
tachysystole
• Alternative labor
strategies considered
• Prepared patient
• High probability of
success
• Maximum application
time and number of
pop-offs
predetermined
• Cesarean and
resuscitation teams
available
22
ERM in a Decentralized Organization
Everyone’s a Risk
Manager ERM
Identify the key risks
that will interfere in
meeting our Mission
Identify risk treatments
and leverage the Power
of Ten
Office of the President
sponsors numerous
risk treatment
initiatives
23
ERM Program: Focus on Tools Example
• “No Tech” – Informational Content
– Distributed via web/email
“Low Tech”
• “High Tech” – Information Systems
– Cognos based business analytics and
optimization
– Custom-built information systems
Enterprise
Risk
Management
Program
Business Processes
• “Low Tech” – Partial Automation of Data
– Excel based, e.g. risk assessment tool
“High Tech”
“No Tech”
24
ERMIS Business Architecture
25
ERM at the Event Level
Incident
Adverse Event
Claim / Lawsuit
Incident reporting system captures
identified event or near miss
Adverse event directed to category
manager/quality & risk*
Directed to local risk manager, claims
adjuster, OGC and OPRS
Directed to category manager
Serious events identified and
reviewed by weekly quality of care
steering committee
Case reviewed by facility risk
committee for quality of care issues
Trend reports developed by location
quality or risk
Sentinel event/root cause analysis
Corrective action is reported to board
of regents as part of request for
settlement
Metrics & benchmarks
Metrics & benchmarks
Retrospective reviews/UC action
Trend reports provided to location
quality & safety committee
Trend reports provided to location
quality & safety committee
Trend reports are forwarded to the
location executive committee of the
medical staff
Trend reports are forwarded to the
location executive committee of the
medical staff
Trend reports provided to governing
body
Trend reports provided to governing
body
(includes near misses)
26
Resources for Integration
Source: http://www.ucop.edu/riskmgt/erm/bulletins.html
27
UC Action Background
• Basic system functionality was
originally intended to be a campus
specific activity tracking tool
• Original tool was repurposed to
automate the retrospective review
process
• Team has made multiple
presentations on the proposed
functionality of the tool, and
incorporated changes and
suggestions from campus and
medical center risk managers
whenever possible
Tools for Evaluating Risk
29
Overcoming Barriers
ERM is not just about the deliverables!!
• Not just a Risk Assessment, or a Strategic Plan, or Mitigation Plan
• ERM does not replace what you are already doing but rather leverages
these activities and builds on them
• ERM is about the thought process-does not replace your professional
experience or judgment!
Value of ERM
•
•
•
•
Improved management of risks
Improved quality and sustainability of controls
Consistent approach and terminology used across the organization
Improved visibility and understanding of risk across the entire
organization (causality as well as impact)
• Makes
Everyone a Risk Manager!!!
30
Dashboards
A Key Component of ERM Infrastructure
High Level and Drill Down
Monitoring: Example Key Risk Indicators
32
ERMIS Dashboards Background
•
•
•
Users - Risk Managers enterprise
wide, enterprise leadership, general
counsel’s office, external finance staff,
UCSF Police Department personnel,
and medical center HR and quality
departments
Web based BI solution
Designed to provide:
–
–
–
–
–
Better quantitative analysis capabilities
Improved analytical and reporting
capabilities
Support for leading risk governance and
compliance processes
System wide visibility, with local flexibility
Scalability without additional burden on
UC staff
ERMIS Cognos Dashboard Development Priority Pipeline
Process Overview Steps
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Medical Quality
Strategic Sourcing
Office of General Counsel
Travel Incidents, Calls, Claims
UC Travel Dashboard
Waste Management Workgroup
Ergonomics / Remedy Interactive
Education Abroad Program (EAP)
Construction
Contracts & Grants
StayWell Location Participation
Medical Center PL Cube
Rep Risk - (CDPH, OSHA)
University of California, Irvine
Safety Index + Enhancements
Human Capital + Enhancements
Budget and Risk Assessment
Master Scorecard
UC Ready Dashboard
Effort Reporting
Fine Arts
IVOS





























Process Overview Steps










































































24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
Dashboard Name
UCSF Disability Management
NFPA
UCSD Scorecards (Target 3/11)
UCSD HR
UCD MC
UC Police Dept (Target 4/11)
TM1 – ERMIS / Budget and Plan
Health Policy and Services
2
3





























Process Step Indicators
 = Completed
2. KPI Development & Data Availability
6. Prototype Testing
 = Started
3. Develop Solution Outline (Mock-Up)
7. Design Review and Final Approval
= Not Started
6

37 UCI Lab Building Safety Survey
UCI Ergonomic -Pelletier, Remedy,
38
Equip Purchase, Costs
39 UCI Actuarial Data
40 UC Ready Enhancements
41 ERMIS Adoption Dashboard
42 Waste Management & Recycling
5. Dashboard Design & Development
5


1. Receive Dashboard Request
4

UCB – AVC
33 Be Smart about Safety
34 OGC Package
35 UCI Safety On Site Prog Metrics
36 UCI LMS Safety Training Records
Process Step Descriptions
4. Data Acquisition
1
7
Overcoming Barriers
35
Outcomes
Return on Investment (ROI)
Key Components Driving Value
ERM process- tools include these four
components:
•
Create Efficiency – Benefits that result in saved time,
fewer resources, or faster cycle time
•
Reduce Cost of Risk – Benefits that result in a lower risk
exposure, fewer claims, less expensive claims, lower
insurance rates or reduced administrative costs
•
Improve Cost of Borrowing – Benefits that result in
improved debt ratings and reduced borrowing rates
•
Reduce IT and Operational Redundancy – Benefits that
allow users to leverage a single tool to support multiple
activities, or support a single process system-wide to
achieve consistency
Create
Efficiency
Reduce Cost
of Risk
Improve Cost
of Borrowing
Reduce IT and
Operational
Redundancy
Example: ERM Benefits in Healthcare
First non-financial institution to receive credit agency
acknowledgement of ERM program
System-wide ERM
information
system
Drive down total
cost of risk to
13.43 per $1000
of operating
budget
Cost avoidance
($493 million)
38
• Perinatal
safety
initiative
• Bundles
• Induction
• Vacuum
• Standardize
• Measure
harm
OUTCOMES
• 16 hospitals
PROCESS
OB
Preventing Harm-OB Example
• Adverse
outcome
index
• 8% decrease
in adverse
outcomes
• 790 births
• Preliminary
claim costs:
33% to 14%
39
OB Risk Management Intervention-Shoulder Dystocia
40
Demonstrate
Decision
Analysis
Experts
Facilitators
Future Risk Management
Quantify
Risk
Outcomes
in Value
Creation
Outcomes – Data ROR
Operational
Excellence
SSE rate
decreased
70%
TCOR less
than $10 per
$1000 of
operating
budget
ERM metric
compliance
98%
41
Notes
Information is educational and is based on several references
including but not limited to:
 AON 2009 and 2010 Global Risk Management Survey
 Greater Expectations, Greater Opportunities-Excellence in RM VIII –
RIMS/Marsh 2011
 ERM Framework-Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission
 AON/ASHRM Benchmarking and Liability Report-2010
•
This presentation is for informational/educational purposes only. The speakers do not warrant as to the
accuracy of the data or opinions expressed.
42
Designing an ERM
Infrastructure
A Model from Healthcare
Michelle Hoppes, RN, MS, AHRMQR, DFASHRM-SVP Sedgwick HRM&PS
Grace Crickette, Chief Risk Officer, UC
Linda Epstein Esq. , Acting General Counsel, Health Management Associates, Inc.
Download