Gram-Positives: Focus on MRSA From Bench to Bedside Andrew E. Simor, MD, FRCPC, FACP Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre University of Toronto Disclosures I have received grants, or served as a consultant on Advisory Boards for: • • • • • Astellas Pharma BD GeneOhm Janssen-Ortho Pfizer Canada Sepracor Pharmaceuticals Resistant Gram-Positive Pathogens MRSA VRE C. difficile Staphylococcus aureus • • S. aureus is most common cause of healthcare-associated infections MRSA is the major antibioticresistant organism in hospitals; CA-MRSA increasing Annual Deaths in the U.S. for Selected Infectious Diseases Infectious disease No. of deaths Year MRSA 19,000 20051 AIDS 14,561 20072 TB 644 20063 Viral hepatitis 5793 20021 1.Boucher CID 2008; 46(Suppl 5):S344-9 2. http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/topics/surveillance/basic.htm#ddaids 3 http://www.cdc.gov/TB/publications/factsheets/statistics/TBTrends.htm DeLeo and Chambers JCI 2009 adapted from Klevens JAMA 2007 MRSA in Canada, 1995-2009 Overall Infection Colonization MRSA per 1,000 admissions 12 10 8 6 4 2 19 95 19 96 19 97 19 98 19 99 20 00 20 01 20 02 20 03 20 04 20 05 20 06 20 07 20 08 20 09 0 Simor, Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2010; Canadian Nosocomial Infection Surveillance Program MRSA in Canadian Hospitals Simor, Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2010 MRSA Infections, 2008-09 (30%) 40 30 20 % 10 0 Skin/Soft tissue SSI Resp Blood Urine Other Canadian Nosocomial Infection Surveillance Program MRSA in Canadian Hospitals CANWARD: 10 hospitals, 2008 MRSA accounted for 5% of all clinical isolates (5% blood, 6% respiratory, 12% wound isolates) Zhanel, Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2010 MRSA Bloodstream Infections Location MRSA as a % of S. aureus bacteremias U.K.* 36 Ontario† Quebec§ 18 21 Canada (CANWARD)** 24 *Jeyaratnam, BMJ 2008; † QMPLS, 2009; §Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec, 2008; **Adam, Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2011 MRSA in Canadian Hospitals, 2010 There were: approx 36,000 new MRSA patients 11,000 new MRSA infections 2,200 MRSA-related deaths $250 million excess costs attributable to MRSA Molecular Epidemiology of CA-MRSA Otter, Lancet ID, 2010 MRSA in Canada: Evolving Molecular Epidemiology PFGE type 19951999 20042007 20082009 CMRSA-2 (USA100) 14% 58% 49% CMRSA-10 (USA300) <1% 17% 32% Simor, Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2010; Simor, IDSA 2010 Provincial Distribution of MRSA Strains (2008-2010) 90.0% 80.0% Percent MRSA Isolates 70.0% CMRSA1 CMRSA2 60.0% CMRSA3/6 CMRSA4 50.0% CMRSA5 CMRSA7 40.0% CMRSA8 CMRSA9 30.0% CMRSA10 Others (non-CMRSAs) 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% BC n=219 AB n=399 SK/MB n=150 ON n=458 QC n=129 ATL n=267 Province Canadian Nosocomial Infection Surveillance Program CA-MRSA & HA-MRSA MRSA infections by age-groups 2008 surveillance 25.00% Percentage (%) 20.00% 15.00% CA-MRSA HA-MRSA 10.00% 5.00% 0.00% <10 [10-19] [20-29] [30-39] [40-49] [50-59] [60-69] [70-79] >80 Patients' age (years) Canadian Nosocomial Infection Surveillance Program CA-MRSA Epidemiology neonates, children homeless, incarcerated, IVDU MSM, HIV-infected military personnel athletes (contact sports) native aboriginals household contacts veterinarians, livestock handlers David, Clin Microbiol Rev 2010 Livestock-Associated MRSA SCCmec IV, PVL-neg Pigs: ST398 (not typeable by PFGE SmaI) (Voss, Emerg Infect Dis 2005; Khanna, Vet Microbiol 2008; Golding, Emerg Infect Dis 2010) Horses: CMRSA-5 (USA500; t007) (Weese, Emerg Infect Dis 2005) MRSA in Domestic Pets reported in cats, dogs, guinea pigs, parrots a variety of clones, often HA-MRSA (Weese, Vet Microbiol 2006; David, Clin Microbiol Rev 2010) CA-MRSA as a Cause of Healthcare-Associated Infections • USA400 post-partum infections, NY mastitis, cellulitis, abscesses (Saiman, CID 2003) • USA300 prosthetic joint infections, SSIs (Kourbatova, Am J Infect Control 2005; Patel, J Clin Microbiol 2007) • USA300 accounted for 28% healthcare-associated bacteremias, 20% nosocomomial MRSA BSIs, Atlanta, GA (Seybold, CID 2006) • USA300 transmission in a Canadian Burn unit (McGuire, SHEA 2007) CA-MRSA in Canadian Hospitals predominantly SSTI, in younger adults, Western Canada 60% community-associated; 40% healthcare-associated 94% PVL-positive (predominantly CMRSA-10; SCCmec type IV) Simor, Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2010 CA-MRSA: Enhanced Virulence? associated with severe and recurrent SSTI, often in individuals without predisposing risk factors associated with necrotizing pneumonia appears to be easily transmitted in hospitals, households, and the community CA-MRSA Virulence • USA 300/400 more virulent than other strains of S. aureus/MRSA in a mouse model of bacteremia • more resistant to killing by human PMNs Voyich, J Immunol 2005; Li, PNAS 2009 MRSA USA300 Virulence Factors David, Clin Microbiol Rev 2010 CA-MRSA Virulence Panton-Valentine Leukocidin (PVL) -hemolysin (increased expression in CA-MRSA; -hemolysin antibody protective in mouse model) (Wardenburg, Nature Med 2007) Argenine catabolic mobile element (ACME; unique to CA-MRSA, S. epidermidis; may help strain evade host response and facilitate colonization) (Goering, J Clin Microbiol 2007) PVL Gene and Survival Gillet, Lancet 2002 PVL Gene and Virulence using isogenic PVL knockout mutants in murine models (subcut abscess, pneumonia) has given conflicting results (Voyich, J Infect Dis 2006; Labandeira-Rey, Science 2007) PVL does appear to contribute to virulence in a rabbit bacteremia model (An Diep, PLoS ONE 2008) MRSA Impact • attributable mortality and morbidity (Whitby, Med J Austr 2001; Cosgrove, Clin Infect Dis 2003) • prolonged hospital length of stay (Engemann, Clin Infect Dis 2003; Cosgrove, Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2005) • excess/attributable costs, $14,360 (Kim, Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2001) Impact of MRSA Infections Infection Mortality (%) MRSA Bacteremia* 20-35 MRSA Pneumonia† 25-60 * Cosgrove, Clin Infect Dis 2003; Melzer, Clin Infect Dis 2003; Wyllie, BMJ 2006 † Combes, AJRCCM 2004; DeRyke, Chest 2005; Zahar, Clin Infect Dis 2005 Why does antibiotic resistance affect outcome? • Host factors • Organism virulence • Delay in instituting effective therapy (or vancomycin less effective) Bradley, Clin Infect Dis 2002; Paterson, Clin Infect Dis 2004; Kim, Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2008 MRSA Bacteremia in Canadian Hospitals, 2008-09 MRSA bacteremia rates: 0.50 per 1,000 admissions 0.61 per 10,000 patient-days source of bacteremia: skin, soft tissue, SSI 1y bacteremia, CA-BSI pneumonia - 36% - 24% - 16% healthcare-associated, 72% community-associated, 28% (CMRSA-2, 49%; CMRSA-10, 32%) Simor, IDSA 2010 MRSA Bacteremia in Canadian Hospitals, 2008 30-day all-cause mortality: 23% variables associated with mortality: age > 65 yrs (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.3-3.9) pneumonia (OR 4.0, 95% CI 2.0-7.8) HA-MRSA (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.1-4.8) mortality not associated with PFGE type, PVL gene, or reduced susceptibility to vancomycin (3 isolates with MIC = 2) Simor, IDSA 2010 MRSA Infection How does treatment affect outcome? Vancomycin Susceptibility Breakpoints in Staphylococci MIC (µg/ml) Interpretation 2 Susceptible 4-8 Intermediate 16 Resistant CLSI Predictors of Persistent MRSA Bacteremia (multivariate analysis) Risk factors OR (95% CI) P value Vancomycin MIC ≥ 2 µg/ml 6.3 (1.2-33.1) 0.03 Retained 10.4 (1.1-104.6) medical device 0.05 MRSA infection at ≥ 2 sites 0.01 10.2 (1.7-61.0) Yoon, J Antimicrob Chemother 2010 70 Clinical success (%) Clinical success (%) Vancomycin MICs and Treatment Outcome in MRSA Bacteremia 60 50 40 p=0.01 30 20 10 0 <0.5 1.0 - 2.0 Vancomycin MIC (mg/ml)1 1 Sakoulas, J Clin Microbiol 2004 2 Moise-Broder, Clin Infect Dis 2004 70 60 p=0.003 50 40 30 20 10 0 0.5 1 2 Vancomycin MIC (mg/ml)2 MRSA Pneumonia Outcome 158 cases MRSA pneumonia (HAP/VAP) 28-day mortality: 32% mortality increased with vancomycin MIC > 1.5 µg/ml Haque, Chest 2010 What about hVISA? hVISA (heteroresistant): MIC susceptible (< 4 µg/ml), but with a resistant sub-population; detected by PAP-AUC preliminary step towards development of VISA (Hiramatsu, Lancet ID 2001) may be associated with treatment failure (Sakoulas, Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2005) Impact of hVISA: A Meta-Analysis van Hal, Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2011 Canadian MRSA and Vancomycin Adam, Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2010 Vancomycin and Treatment Failure • • • higher vancomycin MICs associated with worse outcome thus: recommendations to use higher vancomycin doses (target trough: 15-20 µg/ml) (Liu, Clin Infect Dis 2011) but, higher troughs not associated with better outcome; associated with increased nephrotoxicity (Hidayat, Arch Intern Med 2006) Liu, Clin Infect Dis 2011 MRSA Treatment Guidelines: Evidence-Based? Liu, Clin Infect Dis 2011 Can we do a better job of preventing MRSA infection? MRSA Infection Control Strategies • • • contact precautions screening decolonization Evidence for Effectiveness of Active Surveillance + Contact Precautions • ecological studies (Verhoef, EJCMID 1999; Tiemersma, Emerg Infect Dis 2004) • observational/quasi-experimental studies (Jernigan, Am J Epidemiol 1996; Chaix, JAMA 1999; Huang, Clin Infect Dis 2006; Robicsek, Ann Intern Med 2008) • mathematical models (Bootsma, PNAS 2006) PCR vs. Chromogenic Media prospective, crossover study, 2 hospital wards, UK median time to report MRSA: 47 hrs vs. 21 hrs (culture vs. PCR; p<0.001) no reduction in MRSA transmission Aldeyab, J Hosp Infect 2009 MRSA Decolonization decolonization to prevent staphylococcal SSI (Bode, N Engl J Med 2010) observational studies with mupirocin or other agents as part of infection control measures (Hill, J Antimicrob Chemother 1998; Strausbaugh, ICHE 1992; Sandri, ICHE 2006; Ridenour, ICHE 2007; Bowler, ICHE 2010) interrupted time-series analysis in 2 UK ICUs: chlorhexidine gluconate baths reduced MRSA transmission, but emergence of strains with reduced susceptibility to CHG (Batra, Clin Infect Dis 2010) MRSA: The Dutch Experience • national “search and destroy policy” screening patients, staff strict isolation decolonization environmental cleaning outbreak control Verhoef, EJCMID 1999; van Trijp, Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2007 MRSA Bacteremia - England Pearson, J Antimicrob Chemother 2009 MRSA in Canada - 2011 • Infectious morbidity of HA-MRSA and CA-MRSA continues to increase • Need to better understand variables associated with treatment failure • Need to better understand and implement effective strategies for MRSA infection prevention The End