Tell me and I will forget, Show me and I may remember, Involve me and I will understand. Situated Learning Legitimate peripheral participation Lave & Wagner, 1991 Goal of this book Rescue the idea of apprenticeship Remove the stereotypes associated with apprenticeship. Ch. 1 A little history… How do we get from apprenticeship to legitimate peripheral participation? Apprenticeship implies situated learning General knowledge and when/where to use it. Situated learning leads to legitimate peripheral participation Learning is not merely situated in practice, it is integral to the generative social practice. Don’t attack the schools! Attack = bad “We do not talk here about schools in any substantial way, nor explore what our work has to say about schooling.” [39] Poke and jab = ok “…we are persuaded that rethinking schooling from the perspective afforded by legitimate peripheral participation will be a fruitful exercise.”[41] Ch. 2 Practice, Person, Social World Most theories of learning only focus on the person Analysis and instruction are driven by “knowledge domains” and constrained by assimilation and acquisition mechanisms. Legitimate peripheral participation “Learning is not merely a condition for membership, but is an evolving form of membership.”[53] Relations between persons, place, and participation in communities of practice. Ch. 3 Examples of apprenticeship Midwives Tailors Quartermasters Butchers Nondrinking Alcoholics Examples of apprenticeship (cont’d) Why? Provide historically and culturally specific examples to show legitimate peripheral participation History Technology Developing work activity Careers Relations between newcomers and old-timers and newcomers/newcomers and old-timers/old-timers Apprenticeship misconceptions Yeah, I know what you’re thinking. A master/apprentice blacksmith in feudal Europe. Narrow definition due to functionalist and Marxist views of educational “progress” Treated like a historical object Today, learning in the form of apprenticeship occurs when high levels of knowledge and skill are in demand. Yucatec Midwives Informal, family Teaching is not central to the midwives or to learning Apprenticeship happens as a way of, and in the course of, daily life. Telling stories, etc. Vai and Gola Tailors (W. Africa) More formal learning than midwives Learn skills in a backward order 1. Learn to sew, press clothes 2. Learn to cut 3. Learn to measure Naval Quartermasters Very formal, go to school School teaches terminology and concepts No real experience Problem: Can pick up bad habits On the job training Learn general tasks first Learn specific tasks last Meat Cutters Formal, school and on the job training In school Learn skills easy to teach in classroom, but not used in supermarket Wholesale cuts Sharpening knives Apprentices placed in most needed position, and may never leave. Position at work doesn’t allow apprentices to watch others and learn, or be watched. Nondrinking Alcoholics Several AA meetings a week with near-peers and adepts. Old-timers tell stories Smaller discussion meetings Newcomers gradually become old-timers * Personal stories are told to provide a model of alcoholism. Newcomers aren’t told how to tell their stories, but most learn how. Exposed to models Interaction Ch. 4 In Communities of Practice Goals: “Discuss the structuring of resources that shape the process and content of learning possibilities and apprentices’ changing perspectives on what is known and done.”[91] How do they learn this stuff? How is identity and motivation generated as newcomers become old-timers? In Communities of Practice: Structuring Resources for Learning in Practice Master-apprentice relation isn’t what defines a newcomer in all cases Midwives, tailors, nondrinking alcoholics “In all cases, there is little observable teaching, the more basic phenomenon is learning.”[91] Community creates the curriculum “Learners, as peripheral participants, can develop a view of what the whole enterprise is about, and what is to be learned.”[93] In Communities of Practice: Structuring Resources for Learning in Practice (cont’d) Apprentices learn mostly in relation with other apprentices Must decenter common notions of mastery “Mastery resides not in the master but in the organization of the community of practice of which master is part.”[94] This moves focus from teaching to learning. In Communities of Practice: The Place of Knowledge: Participation, Learning Curricula, Communities of Practice. Apprentices gradually assemble a general idea of what constitutes the practice of the community Who is involved What they do What everyday life is like How masters talk, walk, work What other learners are doing Community offers “exemplars” (grounds and motivation for learning) Masters Finished products More advanced apprentices In Communities of Practice: The Place of Knowledge: Participation, Learning Curricula, Communities of Practice. (cont’d) Two types of schooling Learning curriculum Situated opportunities for the improvisational development of new practice A field of learning resources in everyday practice viewed from the perspective of learners. Teaching curriculum Constructed for the instruction of newcomers Supplies (and thereby limits) structuring resources for learning. In Communities of Practice: The Place of Knowledge: Participation, Learning Curricula, Communities of Practice. (cont’d) Learning curriculum is characteristic of a community. It assumes members Have different interests Make diverse contributions to activity Hold varied viewpoints In Communities of Practice: The Problem of Access: Transparency and Sequestration To become a full member of a community of practice requires access to a wide range of Ongoing activity Old-timers Could virtual agents be considered old-timers? Other members of the community Info, resources, and opportunities for participation Transparency: when a learner understands the inner workings of a “black box” resource and understands its’ significance for use. In Communities of Practice: The Problem of Access: Transparency and Sequestration (cont’d) Communities of practice sequester newcomers Reproductive cycle birth of newcomer, not baby Schoolchildren are legitimately peripheral, but kept from participation in the social world In Communities of Practice: Discourse and Practice Learning to talk the trade Difference between talking about a practice from outside and talking within it. Stories are important Learning is supported by conversations and stories about problematic and difficult cases Technician “war story” Telling the story is a tool of diagnosis and reinterpretation In Communities of Practice: Motivation and Identity: Effects of Participation Newcomer’s initial tasks are Short and simple Low cost of errors Little responsibility Not a lot of time involved Distinction between play and work is fuzzy Intrinsic rewards shouldn’t be used. The value of contribution to the community is the reward In Communities of Practice: Motivation and Identity: Effects of Participation (cont’d) Schools don’t do this (initial tasks) Consequences “Identity of learners becomes an explicit object of change, instead of view of self as object.”[112] Exchange value replaces use value Test taking takes over (parasitic practice) No cultural identity of the activity No field of mature practice for what is being learned Another note. Current analyses of schools Assumes teacher and pupil share the goal of the main activity Ch. 5 Conclusion Legitimate peripheral participation Moves in a centripetal direction Motivated by Location in a field of mature practice Growing use value of participation Newcomers’ desires to become full practitioners Remember the penguins! Reference Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1999). Situated Learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.