Los Angeles County Bilingual/EL Directors Meeting CDE Update October 5, 2012 Magdalena Ruz Gonzalez Silvina Rubinstein Common Core State Standards Systems Implementation Plan • In March 2012 the State Board of Education voted to present, in partnership with the State Superintendent of Public Instruction, the Common Core State Standards Systems Implementation Plan. • The plan identifies major phases and activities in the implementation of the Common Core State Standards (CCSS). See handout # 3 Common Core State Standards Systems Implementation Plan, Cont. The document includes: • Several appendices • A template that local educational agencies may use as a starting point for developing their own local plans. • Information from various professional organizations regarding how these organizations can assist local educational agencies in implementing the CCSS. Common Core State Standards Systems Implementation Plan, Cont. • The CCSS Systems Implementation Plan for California is available on the California Department of Education Common Core State Standards Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/re/cc/. For additional information, please contact Barbara Murchison, Common Core Systems Implementation Office, at 319-0490. California English Language Development (ELD) Standards AB 124 ELD Standards Revision Bilingual Coordinators Network September 20, 2012 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction California English Language Development (ELD) Standards AB 124 ELD Standards Revision Bilingual Coordinators Network September 20, 2012 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Presentation Objectives • Provide update on CA English Language Development (ELD) standards revision process • Describe key shifts in the CA ELD standards made to ensure full alignment to Common Core State Standards • Illustrate how Proficiency Level Descriptors (PLDs) and ELD standards were refined based on public comment • Highlight implementation plan next steps 7 ELD Standards Development Timeline 8 Summary of Public Comments •Public invited to comment (140 comments received) on the following documents: – Introduction/Proficiency Level Descriptors (PLDs) – CA ELD Standards Template – CA ELD Standards (K-8, 9-10, 11-12) •Comments categorized into following priorities: 1. Number of Proficiency Levels and PLDs 2. Correspondence to the Common Core 3. Horizontal and Vertical Alignment 4. Reading Foundational Skills Response to Comments Positives, questions, and revisions: 1. Number of Proficiency Levels and PLDs: + Ample and clear descriptors ? From 5 to 3 proficiency levels Greater delineation (entry/progress through, exit) 2. Correspondence to the Common Core State Standards (CCSS): + Clear link to CCSS ? Show correspondence, strengthen rigor Rigor added, correspondence shown Response to Comments, cont’d. Positives, questions, and revisions: 3. Horizontal and Vertical Alignment: + Clear, gradual, nonlinear ? Specificity, distinctions, Parts I and II Strengthened specificity/distinctions; prepared Appendix clarifying how Parts I & 2 interrelate 4. Reading Foundational Skills: + Important to signal, place in appendix ? Ensure proper use, allow public review, note L1 as resource Prepared appendix clarifying use within ELD standards; shared draft with public; clarified L1 as strategic resource Response to Comments, cont’d. Additional Resources Developed: • Overviews of the CA ELD Standards and of Proficiency Level Descriptors • Three appendices: – Theoretical Foundations and Research Base – Part II: Learning About How English Works – Literacy Foundational Skills 12 CA ELD Standards: Purpose Align with California’s Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts, Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects (Common Core State Standards) Highlight and amplify the key language knowledge, skills, and abilities in the Common Core State Standards critical for ELs to simultaneously be successful in school while they are developing English CA ELD Standards: Purpose Provide opportunities for ELs to access, engage with, and achieve in grade-level academic content while they are learning English Designed to be used in tandem with the Common Core State Standards and not in isolation Proficiency Level Descriptors (PLDs) Overview • Describe student knowledge, skills, and abilities across a continuum, identifying what ELs know and can do • Provide three proficiency levels: Emerging, Expanding, and Bridging – at early and exit stages • Guide targeted instruction in ELD, as well as differentiated instruction in academic content areas Proficiency Level Descriptors (PLDs) Overview, cont’d. Include: •Overall Proficiency: A general descriptor of ELs’ abilities at entry to/progress through, and exit from the level •Extent of linguistic support needed per the linguistic and cognitive demands of tasks, at early stages and as ELs develop Proficiency Level Descriptors (PLDs) Overview, cont’d. Include: Descriptors for early stages of and exit from each proficiency level, using ELD standard structure: •Three Modes of Communication: – Collaborative (engagement in dialogue with others) – Interpretive (comprehension and analysis of written and spoken texts) – Productive (creation of oral presentations and written texts) •Two dimensions of Knowledge of Language: – Metalinguistic Awareness (language awareness & self-monitoring) – Accuracy of Production (acknowledging variation) 18 19 The 2012 ELD Standards’ Structure and Components Include: • 2-page “At a Glance” • Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways • Part II: Learning about How English Works • Part III: Using Foundational Literacy Skills 20 Walk-Through of the 2012 ELD Standards’ Structure and Components: Grade 7 Example 21 “At a glance” 22 “At a glance” 23 “At a glance” 24 “At a glance” 25 “At a glance” 26 “At a glance” 27 Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways 28 Part II: Learning about How English Works 29 Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways 30 Part II: Learning about How English Works 31 Highlights of Draft Appendices Additional Resources to Support Understanding and Implementation: – Theoretical Foundations and Research Base – Part II: Learning About How English Works – Literacy Foundational Skills 32 Appendix: Theoretical Foundations and Research Base for the ELD Standards Theoretical Foundations • Socio-cultural and socio-linguistic approaches • Socio-cognitive and cognitive approaches • Genre and meaning based approaches • Substantial section on scaffolding for ELs • Explanation of “substantial, moderate, light” descriptors Research Base • EL language and literacy development • Effective instructional practices Other Resources • “Understanding Language”; “Framework for ELPD Standards”; state, national, and international frameworks 33 Appendix: CA ELD Standards Part II: Learning About How English Works Perspective on how to support EL students using Parts I and II in concert: Language Demands of the Common Core •Description of how language is integrated into the Common Core Moving From Everyday to Academic Registers •Strategies to support transition to academic registers Application of Part II strands 34 Appendix: Foundational Literacy Skills Research on English Learners • English learners benefit from reading foundational skills instruction • Oral English proficiency is crucial for English literacy • Native language literacy facilitates English literacy learning Reading Foundational Skills Alignment Charts • Student language and literacy characteristics • Considerations for literacy foundational skills instruction • CA Common Core Reading Standards: Foundational Skills Alignment Charts • K – 5, by grade • 6 – 12, by grade span 35 Appendix: Foundational Literacy Skills 36 Next Steps for CA in Larger Context of CCSS Implementation • • • • ELD standards revised & approved (2012) ELD implementation plan approved (2013) ELD professional development materials produced (2013-14) ELA/ELD Curriculum Framework developed by Instructional Quality Commission (2014-15) • SBAC assessment developed (2014-15) • Next-generation ELD assessment developed (2015-16) • ELA/ELD Adoption of K-8 Instructional Materials (2016) 37 ELD Standards Technical Aspect of Standards • Aligned with, and support, the California Common Core Content Standards • Three proficiency levels instead of five: Emerging, Expanding, Bridging • General description of ELs’ abilities at “early stage of” and “exit from” each level • Listening, Speaking, Reading, and Writing domains are not explicit ELD Standards Technical Aspect of Standards Impact on CELDT: • Integrating the new standards into the assessment • Review structure of current CELDT for necessary changes to align to the new standards. • Create new items as needed to assess new standards. • Pilot items. • Field-test items. • Administer new operational kindergarten, grade one, and grade two assessments in 2015–16. CELDT Administration • • • • Separation of K–1 Test Educators’ meeting: October 11, 2012 Item writing activities: January–April 2013 Content and bias and sensitivity reviews: May 2013 • Item pilots: May–June 2013 • Field test: 2014–15 • Projected separation: 2015–16 CELDT Reporting • New report: CELDT Test Results by Prior Overall Performance Level– Current CELDT overall performance and most recent previous CELDT overall performance– State, county, district, and school levels • DataQuestWebpage http://dq.cde.ca.gov/dataquest/ CELDT Reporting (cont.) CELDT Reporting (cont.) New Resources • 2012–13 CELDT Information Guide –General program information and guidance on reporting and using results–Guidance about American Sign Language and reclassification for English learners with severe cognitive disabilities–Checklist of key actions for the administration of the CELDT to students with disabilities New Resources (cont.) • Released Test Questions –Updated to include new sample student responses –Will include the revisions to the scoring rubrics • CELDT 101 – Updated Soon – Information about the new ELD standards • All these resources are available at: http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/tg/el/resources.a sp CELDT Administration (cont.) • Transitional Kindergarten (TK) • TK students whose primary language is other than English must be administered the CELDT. • 2012–13 Edition: – Mark the “K” bubble for grade – Include date of birth • 2013–14 Edition:– “TK” bubble for grade may be added to the answer book. What’s New for 2012–13 • Name and Tell TOM TORLAKSON State Superintendent of Public Instruction –New item type to be field tested •Available now or soon on www.celdt.org: –CELDT Fundamentals • Basic CELDT information –CELDT Quarterly Webinars • Thematic, based on quarterly CELDT tasks –CELDT Tutorials • Five short tutorials on how to use the CELDT Webbased applications 14 Key Dates TOM TORLAKSON State Superintendent of Public Instruction • May 2012 — Release of the 2011–12 CELDT AA results • July 2012 — Posting of the 2012 CELDT Information Guide • July 1, 2012 — 2012–13 CELDT AA and IA windows open • August 24, 2012 — STOT, Orange County Office of Education • August 28, 2012 — Final STOT, Sacramento County Office of Education • Fall, 2012 — K–1 Educators’ Meeting, Sacramento • November 15, 2012 — ELD Standards SBE deadline 16 Title III Accountability • Part I — 2011–12 Title III Accountability • TitleIII Accountability Overview • Release of AMAOs 1 and 2 Results– Analysis of AMAO 1 Results– Analysis of AMAO 2 Results– Reasons for the improvement in AMAOs Results • Posting of Title III Information Guide• Release of AMAO3 Results and Research File Release of AMAOs 1 & 2 Results • Percent of LEAs/Consortia meeting AMAOs • AMAO 1 – 83% • AMAO 2 – 59%– 75% met target of less than 5 years – 69% met target of 5 years or more LEAs and consortia N=706 Source: June 2012 update Posting of Title III Accountability Information Guide 2011-2012 • Title IIII Accountability Report Information Guide posted in August 2012Available on the CDE Title III Accountability Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/t3/ Release of AMAO 3 Results and Research File Release in October 2012: • 2011–12 Title III Accountability Reports of the annual measurable achievement objectives (AMAOs 1, 2, and 3) • 2011–12 Title III Accountability Research file Available on the CDE Title III Accountability Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/t3/ Cash Management Data Collection System Most recent reporting period – July 10–31, 2012 Next reporting period – October 10–31, 2012 Cash Management Data Collection System Resources and Contacts • For more information on the data collection system, including instructions, reporting dates, and frequently asked questions, please visit the California Department of Education (CDE) Federal Cash Management Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/aa/cm/. • For program questions, please contact Karen Almquist, Education Fiscal Services Assistant, by phone at 916-327-4406 or by email at FederalCashManagement@cde.ca.gov. 2012–13 Applications • Applications for 2012–13 Limited English Proficient (LEP) and Immigrant Education Student Subgrant Programs have been submitted by local educational agencies (LEAs). Any LEAs who missed the application deadline will have to wait until 2013-14 to determine their eligibility and apply. 2012–13 Private School Participation • Applications for 2012–13 Limited English Proficient (LEP) and Immigrant Education Student Subgrant Programs have been submitted by local educational agencies (LEAs). Any LEAs who missed the application deadline will have to wait until 2013-14 to determine their eligibility and apply. 2012–13 Private School Participation • Private school requests to participate (Immigrant) and private school reports via the Con App (LEP) have been completed. • A memorandum of understanding should be completed by October 31, 2012, for any participating private schools. 2012-13 Awards The 2011–12 Title III estimated per pupil amounts are: – LEP: $104.05 – Immigrant: $100.00 2012–13 Awards • Title III sub-grantees no longer receive an award letter from the Language Policy and Leadership Office (LPLO). • Funding information is available on the Title III Immigrant and LEP Entitlement Listing page at: http://www.cde.ca.gov/sp/el/t3/tiiiapportnoti fy11.asp. End of Year Expenditure Reports • End of Year (EOY) expenditure reports for Direct Funded and Consortia LEAs are projected to be available via CARS online October 2012. • Consortia leads will only report for the year(s) they were the lead. • The LPLO will not be sending the notificationLEAs will receive notice via CARS. End of Year Expenditure Reports • LEAs must report all obligations on the EOY expenditure report. – According to the California State Accounting Manual, “Legal obligations are commitments made by an LEA to purchase goods or services immediately or in a future period.” – To determine whether a financial commitment should be reported as an obligation, please refer to Title 34, Part 76, Section 707 from the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR): Retrieve by CFR citation Web page at http://www.gpoaccess.gov/cfr/retrieve.html. End of Year Expenditure Reports All obligations must be liquidated no later than 90 days after the funding period ends. FY 2010–11 subgrant obligations need to be liquidated by December 30, 2012. Federal Guidance: Supplement, not Supplant Webinar May 4, 2011 – Archived on the WestEd Title III Funds: Supplement, Not Supplant in California Web page at http://www.webdialogues.net/cs/TitleIIIcasupplement-home/view/di/248?x-t=home.view. Federal Guidance: Private School Participation Equitable Services Requirements- Services to Limited English Proficient Students in Private Schools Webinar – July 20, 2011 – PowerPoint presentation available by request to Jim Shields by phone at 916-319-0267 or by e-mail at jshields@cde.ca.gov Federal Guidance: Funding for Translation of Documents • Annual letter will be mailed September 2012 • General translation of documents: – May not use Title III for translation of general handout documents – May use Title I for translation of parental notifications Federal Guidance: Funding for Translation of Documents May use Title III for translation of specific documents: – Reason for identification – Method of assessment and level of English proficiency – Description of program settings – Program placement and rationale Federal Guidance: Funding for Translation of Documents – Exit requirements – Coordination with objectives of Individualized Education Program (if appropriate) – Parental rights – Failure to make progress on the Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives (AMAOs) (if appropriate) Title III LEP Program and Fiscal Contacts LEP Student Subgrant Fiscal Questions: Patty Stevens, Associate Governmental Programs Analyst, by phone at 916-323-5838 or by e-mail at pstevens@cde.ca.gov. LEP Student Subgrant Program Questions: Jim Shields, Education Programs Consultant by phone at 916-319-0267 or by e-mail at jshields@cde.ca.gov. Title III Immigrant Program and Fiscal Contacts Immigrant Student Subgrant Fiscal Questions: Patty Stevens, Associate Governmental Programs Analyst, by phone at 916-323-5838 or by e-mail at pstevens@cde.ca.gov. Immigrant Student Subgrant Program Questions: Jim Shields, Education Programs Consultant, by phone at 916-319-0267 or by e-mail at jshields@cde.ca.gov. Parental Waivers for English Learners Handout #4 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Placement of English Learners • Except by parental waiver, all children must be placed in English language classrooms. • English learners are to be educated through sheltered English immersion during a temporary transition period, then transferred to mainstream classrooms. • Under approved parental waivers, children may be transferred to classes where they are taught English and other subjects through bilingual education techniques or other methods permitted by law. Parental Notification • Parents* must be informed of the placement of their children in a structured English immersion program. • All such parents must be notified of an opportunity to apply for a parental exception waiver. • The notice shall include a description of locally-adopted procedures for requesting a waiver and any locally-adopted guidelines for evaluating a waiver request. * “Parent” means “parent or legal guardian” throughout. When a Parental Waiver May Be Granted A waiver may be allowed based on any of the following: • The child already knows English • The child is age 10 or older • The child has special needs Procedures for Granting Waivers • Parent must apply annually in person. • Parent must be given a full description of all options available. • For a waiver based on special needs, pupil must be placed for at least 30 calendar days in an English language classroom; the district superintendent must approve the waiver pursuant to local guidelines. • Waivers must be granted unless school staff have determined that it would not be best for the student. • If 20 or more pupils of a given grade level are granted waivers at a school, the school must offer such a class or allow pupils to transfer to another public school. Recommendation of Waivers • School staff may recommend a waiver to the parent. • Parent must be informed in writing with a full description of the recommended alternative program and all other available options. • Parent has the right to refuse to agree to a waiver. Denial of Waivers • In case a waiver is denied, parents must be informed of reasons in writing. • Parents must be advised that they may appeal to the local board or to the court. Deadlines for Acting on Waiver Requests • All waivers must be acted upon by the school within 20 instructional days of submission to the school principal. • However, waivers based on special needs shall not be acted upon during the 30-day placement in an English language classroom. • These special needs waivers must be acted upon no later than 10 calendar days after expiration of the 30-day placement, or within 20 instructional days of submission to the school principal, whichever is later. Accountability Leadership Institute 2012 Theme Moving Forward: English Language Development Standards, Assessments, and the Common Core Accountability Leadership Institute for English Learners and Immigrant Students SAVE THE DATE December 3-4, 2012 Santa Clara Marriott Email: ALI@cde.ca.gov Keynote Speakers Dr. Lily Wong Fillmore, Ph.D. UC Berkeley School of Education David Coleman President, College Board Xavier De La Torre Superintendent of Santa Clara County Schools Featured Speaker Karen Cadiero-Kaplan, Ph.D. CA Department of Education Workshop Topics • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Common Core Standards English Language Development Standards Assessments Legislative Updates Understanding Language Initiative Migrant Education Program CELDT Update Federal Program Monitoring Long Term English Learners State Seal of Biliteracy ELD/SDAIE Teacher Credentialing Update ELs in Juvenile Justice Schools A Look at Learning A.L.L. And more Monday Evening Keynote and Networking Xavier De La Torre, Superintendent of Santa Clara County Schools High Achievement for All English Learners Registration & Hotel Information Coming Soon Registration $300 Santa Clara Marriott $140 conference rate http://www.cde.ca.gov/sp/el/t3/ State Seal of Biliteracy The First in the Nation 84 State Seal of Biliteracy • Assembly Bill 815 (Brownley, Chapter 618, Statues of 2011) took effect January 1, 2012 • Purpose: To recognize high school graduates who have attained a high level of proficiency in one or more languages in addition to English 85 California State Seal of Biliteracy Language of Proficiency April 2 to August 6, 2012 French 1,059 10% Mandarin 678 6% Japanese 255 2% Spanish 7,600 72% CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Total: 10,685 Cantonese 240 2% German 188 2% Other 301 3% Vietnamese 108 1% Korean 141 Latin 1% 115 1% Other World Languages American Sign 4 Lao 30 Arabic 8 Malay 1 Armenian 5 Mien 1 Chaozhou 1 Mixteco 1 Farsi 17 Pilipino 71 Finnish 1 Polish 1 Gujarti 2 Portuguese 8 Hebrew 4 Punjabi 38 Hindi 2 Romanian 1 Hmong 3 Russian 3 Hungarian 1 Serbo-Croatian 1 Ilocano 1 Taiwanese 2 Indian 1 Turkish 3 Indonesian 1 Urdu 37 Italian 10 Unknown 6 Khmer 36 Total 301 Type of LEA School District Number Seals Issued 94 10,282 County Office of Education 2 99 Charter School 17 304 TOTAL 10,685 California Department of Education Web Information • The CDE State Seal of Biliteracy Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/sp/el/er/sealofbiliteracy.asp • Letter to the field and supporting documents (downloadable) • Frequently Asked Questions • Language Resources • Contact the CDE by e-mail at SEAL@cde.ca.gov 89