Welcome to the presentation on Population, Planning and Priorities Presented by – M.D. Lele, Chief Planner, CIDCO Relevance at the occasion Request to speak on “Challenges of urban settlements and CIDCO’s experience ” PPP in vogue. Why not speak on other 3P’s…People, Planning and Priorities to solve Problems Given the state of the nation today, temptation to add POLITICS So many P’s at a time on a public platform may create ??.. Problems! India Today Adding an Australia every year i.e. about 20 million ! Outnumber the Chinese by 2041 How the housing shortage (constantly pegged at 24 million) remains static! Are we really matching the pace, I wonder at times ! The rate of urbanization in India will accelerate by leaps and bounds and Maharashtra will continue to top the chart 35 million plus cities in India in 2001 and the figure may cross the century mark in 2 more decades, leaving urban planners at the receiving end ! Hypothesis Urban Population exploding, next 3 decades will see 50% population Need to plan for them to provide good living conditions Since resources are limited, we need to prioritize As the growth is rapid, appropriate policies and prioritization is must The eternal triangle Population The City Priorities Planning Politics for development or one upmanship ? The eternal triangle - Relationship People living in the cities are affected by the planning/policies of the ULBs Planning of the ULBs addresses the city problems and are based on available resources Resources are limited; Manpower, Money, Material and Management and not the least TIME. Hence prioritization is required Land : Indispensable and valuable resource Challenge is to judiciously assign activity/use to land The policies framed should benefit the people with optimum use of resources Where do we begin ? Let’s first have enough planners to deal with the myriad problems Plan for more planning schools and development of associated human resources 2 new Planning Schools have become functional at Bhopal and Vijaywada CEPT University at Ahmedabad runs the M.Tech course in Infrastructure Planning. Planning courses at undergraduate level and infrastructure management at PG level in institutes. Thus our priorities are right ! City Planning The most used tool by planners – Development Plan Development Plan – 20 years perspective Facilities/Utilities – Gestation period, long lasting Planning objectives must address people’s requirements and aspirations Failure to recognize them fails the plan (Encroachments, Unauthorized layouts, Undeveloped SF – PU) Dual approach – Whole to part and part to whole Need for ‘Short Term Action Plans’ Planning – Decision making matrix The Three Es while allocating resources including land Economy Equity Environment Competing cities - Chennai, Gurgaon, Pune Competing uses - Malls, Multiplexes, Schools Environment – Can we ignore it to compete and provide more lucrative uses ? Inclusive approach for city’s sustenance – being inorganic Attributes of Planning/Plan Futuristic vision Proper assessment of problems Flexibility in approach – Structure Plan Provision of space to accommodate future requirements /trends, contingencies Pragmatic policies Attributes of Population The plan must cater requirements of all population classes viz. Children, Under-privileged, Physically Challenged, Aged, Homeless, Cosmopolitan, etc. The push-pull migration factor Distinct shift towards cities Productivity of cities Equal opportunity for all to prosper Attributes of Policies Each city is unique and has its own characteristics Ground realities Understanding of how people live What the city needs What the people need Centrally prepared policies - Single solution not workable Issues and solutions should be identified locally Best public interest of maximum number of beneficiaries Comprehensive approach after identifying all influencing factors and likely fall-outs Attributes of Priorities Long-term benefit over short-term pain To extend the benefits to the under-privileged/ vulnerable Scarce resources, hence imperative to get priorities right Decision taken – Asset created, if unused all resources wasted, precious time lost Failure in Implementation of plans Only upto 20% of DP proposals could be implemented Lack of resources Political will Lack of vision Litigations about land/contracts Mismatches between needs and priorities Reasons for poor services Population pressure Absence of long term planning Governance Issues Inadequate cost recovery Precarious financial position of ULBs Poor operation and maintenance of assets Inadequate capacities of assets/people Rationale for JNNURM Challenge lies in bridging the Infrastructure deficit Backlog Present requirement Future needs Creating an environment & statutory framework for smooth transition Need a departure from Business as Usual JNNURM: A response to this challenge Improving O&M of assets JnNURM: The Context Urban Water Supply, Sanitation and Roads will need about 28,035 Crores for next 10 years Urban Transport Infrastructure in cities with population more than 1 Lakh will need 207000 Crores for next 20 years Over a seven-year period, ULBs would require investments of Rs. 1,20,536 crores. JnNURM plans investment of Rs 50,000 crores over 7 years To be matched by State and local governments Rest to be raised from Private Sector Participation Objectives of JNNURM 1 2 Ensure adequate funds to fulfil deficiencies 3 Bring about urbanisation in a dispersed manner through planned development of cities Integrated development of infrastructure services in the cities JNNURM seeks to encourage reforms and fast track planned development 4 Provision of services for the urban poor 6 Secure effective linkages between asset creation & asset management to make infrastructural services selfsustaining 5 Redevelopment of old cities Outcome of JNNURM Reform Agenda Modern and transparent budgeting, accounting, financial management systems, designed and adopted for all urban services and governance functions City-wide framework for planning and governance will be established and become operational All urban residents will be able to obtain access to a basic level of urban services Financially self-sustaining agencies for urban governance and service delivery will be established, through reforms to major revenue instruments Local services and governance will be conducted in a manner that is transparent and accountable to citizens e-Governance applications will be introduced in core functions of ULBs resulting in reduced cost and time of service delivery processes Conclusion Assess rightly the population needs Frame pragmatic policies for inclusive development Prioritize actions Execute decisions Constant Review Because….. Planning is a continuous process! Thank You