DOL/ERISA Issues an Investment Advisory Perspective David C. Franceski, Jr., Esquire Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young, LLP William P. Simon, Jr. Managing Director, Retirement Plan Services Brinker Capital, Inc. DOL’s Changing Expectations David C. Franceski, Jr., Esquire Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young, LLP Who is an ERISA Fiduciary? ERISA § 3(21) Definition of a Fiduciary: Any person who exercises any discretionary authority or control respecting management of a plan or disposition of plan assets renders investment advice for a fee or other compensation, direct or indirect, or has authority to do so has any discretionary authority or responsibility in the administration of such plan ERISA § 3(38) Definition of Investment Manager: Any fiduciary who 1. has the power to manage, acquire or dispose of plan assets 2. is registered as an investment advisor under federal or state law, a bank, or an insurance company qualified to manage etc.; and 3. has acknowledged in writing that he is a fiduciary with respect to the plan DOL Gloss on Definition of Fiduciary 29 C.F.R. 2510.3-21(c) Current Five Part Test – since 1975 1. renders advice as to purchase, sale or value 2. on a regular basis 3. pursuant to a mutual agreement, arrangement or understanding, written or otherwise 4. which serves as a primary basis for investment decisions; and 5. which is individualized based on the needs of the plan Investment Advisors Act, Section 202(a)(11): Definition of Investment Advisor specifically excludes “any broker or dealer whose performance of such services is solely incidental to the conduct of his business as a broker or dealer and receives no special compensation therefore.” But see Nagy v. DeWese, 771 F.Supp.2d 502 (E.D. Pa. 2011); 2011 WL 2565200 (E.D. Pa.) 2011 Proposed Changes to DOL Regs Changes Proposed: October 2010 would have removed “regular basis” test would have removed “primary basis” test would have adopted a “more flexible” test geared to the actual conduct at issue would include anyone holding him/herself out as a fiduciary, unless adverse and not impartial would not include as fiduciary conduct the provision of: educational and information materials marketing a platform for services general financial information and data Changes Withdrawn: October 2011 Other Considerations Impact of Dodd-Frank and proposed uniform fiduciary standard Liability for Breach of Co-fiduciary: ERISA Section 1105 knowing participation in, or concealment of, co-fiduciary’s breach enabling co-fiduciary to breach by failing in one’s responsibilities failure to remedy co-fiduciary’s breach with knowledge of the breach liability may not be limited to actions or inactions within fiduciary role possible repercussions: damages, attorneys’ fees, separate DOL action for penalties Management Liability Under Federal and State Securities Laws Possible Claims direct violation: controlling person liability under § 20(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 aiding and abetting: § 203(e)(6) of Investment Advisors Act of 1940 companion state securities statutes common law failure to supervise Two Recent Examples In the Matter of Theodore W. Urban – General Counsel Liability though ultimately exonerated of failure to supervise changes, general counsel found by ALJ in SEC civil proceeding to have supervisory responsibility for sales personnel in case of abusive sales practices In the Matter of Wunderlich Securities – CEO and CCO liability CEO and CCO agreed to civil penalties totaling $95,000 in SEC action for overcharging fees and failing to disclose principal transactions in feebased brokerage accounts “Tone at the Top” Key Fiduciary Concepts All actions must be in the Client’s Best Interest Be aware of actual or potential Conflicts of Interest; which are waivable and which are not The paramount importance of Disclosure Absolute ban on Prohibited Transactions Costs and compensation – both direct and indirect The impact of Dodd-Frank Whistleblower provisions The Impact of New Section 404(a)(5) Unlike § 408(b)(2) disclosures to plan sponsors, § 404(a)(5) disclosures are directly to plan participants Effective Date: May 31, 2012 DOL compliance cost estimates: $2 billion in compliance costs $14.9 billion in lower participant fees and expenses on top of $135 million in Year 1 § 408(b)(2) compliance costs Who will provide the resources and information: Plan Sponsor v. other Plan Fiduciaries Competitive Impact of New Regulations Downward pressure on plan fees and expenses Cost-saving measures, with advantage to providers with low cost solutions New and different pricing options Limitations on plan types and plan options Revise or institute plan minimums Increased use of “brokerage windows” Legal Takeaways Review and update firm policies and procedures Review registrations – Series 6/7 v. IAR v. Solicitor Review disclosure documents fee disclosure direct and indirect cost disclosure principal transactions disclosure Solicitor disclosure Form B/D Form ADV Review institutional roles – CEO v. COO v. General Counsel Training and continuing education Know your co-fiduciaries: due diligence So What is the Big Deal About Fiduciary Responsibility? William P. Simon, Jr. Managing Director, Retirement Plan Services Brinker Capital, Inc. It Depends on Who You Ask Plan-sponsors ranked Fiduciary support 12th in importance for reasons to select a provider. Wal-Mart, and Merrill Lynch agreed to pay $13.5 Million to settle 401(k) fiduciary lawsuit Source: Cogent Research, Financial Advisor Magazine Suitability vs. The Client’s Best Interest Agenda 1. How today’s markets impact fiduciary risk 2. Fiduciary solutions: know the options 3. Building the right structure The Last 3 to 4 Years Managing Returns to… Managing Risk Summary of S&P 500 Rolling 10-Year Periods 1926-2010 10-Year Period Annual Return 10-Year Period 1926-1935 5.86% 1941-1950 1927-1936 7.81% 1942-1951 1928-1937 0.02% 1943-1952 1929-1938 -0.89% 1944-1953 1930-1939 -0.05% 1945-1954 1931-1940 1.80% 1946-1955 1932-1941 6.43% 1947-1956 1933-1942 9.35% 1948-1957 1934-1943 7.17% 1949-1958 1935-1944 9.28% 1950-1959 1936-1945 8.42% 1951-1960 1937-1946 4.41% 1952-1961 1938-1947 9.62% 1953-1962 1939-1948 7.26% 1954-1963 1940-1949 9.17% 1955-1964 1956-1965 1957-1966 1958-1967 1959-1968 Period Annual 10-Year Annual 10-Year Period ReturnReturn 1926-19351941-19505.86% 13.38% 17.28% 1942-1951 1927-1936 7.81% 17.09% 1943-1952 Annual Return 10-Year Period Annual Return 10-Year Period Annual Return 1928-1937 7.81% 0.02% 13.38% 1960-1969 1974-1983 10.61% 14.31% 1944-1953 17.28% 1961-1970 8.18% 1975-1984 14.76% 1929-19381945-1954 -0.89% 17.09% 1962-1971 7.06% 1976-198517.12% 14.33% 14.31% 1963-1972 9.93% 1977-1986 13.82% 1930-19391946-1955-0.05% 16.69% 17.12% 1964-1973 6.01% 1978-1987 15.26% 1931-19401947-1956 1.80% 16.69% 1965-1974 1.24% 1979-198818.43% 16.33% 18.43% 1966-1975 3.27% 1980-198916.44% 17.55% 1932-19411948-1957 6.43% 16.44% 1967-1976 6.63% 1981-1990 13.93% 20.06% 1933-19421949-1958 9.35% 20.06% 1968-1977 3.59% 1982-1991 17.59% 19.35% 1969-1978 3.16% 1983-199219.35% 16.19% 1934-19431950-1959 7.17% 16.16% 1970-1979 5.86% 1984-1993 14.94% 16.16% 1951-1960 16.43% 1971-1980 8.44% 1985-1994 14.40% 1935-1944 9.28% 16.43% 1952-1961 13.44% 1972-1981 6.47% 1986-1995 14.84% 1936-1945 6.68% 8.42% 15.91% 1973-1982 1987-1996 15.28% 13.44% 1953-1962 12.82% 1988-1997 18.05% 1937-19461954-19634.41% 15.91% 11.06% 1989-1998 19.18% 1938-19471955-19649.62% 9.20% 1990-199912.82% 18.20% 12.85% 1991-2000 17.46% 1939-1948 7.26% 11.06% 1956-1965 10.01% 1992-2001 12.93% 1993-2002 9.20% 9.33% 1940-19491957-19669.17% 1958-1967 1959-1968 Source: Zephyr StyleADVISOR, PPB Advisors, LLC 1994-2003 11.06% 12.85% 1995-2004 12.07% 10.01% 10-Year Period Annual Return 1996-2005 9.08% 1997-2006 8.42% 1998-2007 5.91% 1999-2008 -1.38% 2000-2009 -0.95% 2001-2010 1.41% Fiduciary Solutions: Know the Options Many Firms, Many Voices The Five Largest, Independent Broker Dealers have 28,201 Financial Advisors How do you manage their interaction with multiple plan-sponsors, and reduce your liability? Source: Investment Advisor Magazine FINRA – Dispute Resolution Cases About 6,000 Cases per Year Source: FINRA Arbitration Cases Served by Controversy 2010 Source: FINRA Breach of Fiduciary Duty 3,162 Omission of Facts 1,941 Unsuitability 1,974 Misrepresentation 1,795 Where Do You Fit In? Investment Advisor? Limited Scope? Full Scope? 3(38)? 3(21)? Solicitor? Solicitor vs. Advisor A Solicitor regularly refers clients to an Investment Advisor and who receives compensation for those referrals. An Advisor provides advice or analysis on securities either by making direct or indirect recommendations to clients or by providing research or opinions on securities or securities markets. An adviser with fiduciary responsibilities is held to a higher ethical standard and should have the knowledge to provide sophisticated wealth management services and advice. Where Do You Fit In? 3(21) Limited Scope Has no discretion. Advice may, or may not be acted upon 3(21) Full Scope Is a Named Fiduciary, and has discretion to hire, or change a manager 3(38) Investment Manager By definition they have discretion, and act as a fiduciary Other Options? Fiduciary Warranty or Fiduciary Guarantee Read the Small Print! The Fiduciary Warranty does not “extend to claims that any expenses paid directly or indirectly by the Plan are reasonable.” "...This Warranty and Indemnification does not, and is not intended to, impose or imply any fiduciary status or responsibility with respect to the Plan or any other person.” Source: Mark D. Mensack AIFA, Piedmont Independent Fiduciaries Building the Right Solution Control What You Can Plan sponsor (You) ERISA 3(38) Fiduciary Fiduciary Responsibility Investments Plan Expense Plan Administration and Operation Selecting the right investment line up Menu-list of funds Advice Model portfolios 31 Performance – Average Investor Source: J.P. Morgan Asset Management, 2009 The indexes are used as follows: REITS: NAREIT Equity REIT Index, EAFE: MSCI EAFE, Oil: WTI Index, Bonds: Barclays Capital U.S. Aggregate Index, Homes: median sales price of existing single-family homes, Gold: USD/troy oz, Inflation: CPI. Average asset allocation investor return is based on an analysis by Dalbar Inc. which utilizes the net of aggregate mutual fund sales, redemptions and exchanges each month as a measure of investor behavior. All returns are annualized (and total return where applicable) and represent the 20-year period ending 12/31/09 to match Dalbar’s most recent analysis. 32 401(k) Investors Who Use Professional Help Outperform Those Without It Investors who relied on professional help in the form of target-date funds, managed accounts and advice earned nearly three percentage points more than those that did not. The plans covered 400,000 participants with $25 billion in assets. Source: Aon Hewitt and Financial Engines-Money Management Executive September 26, 2011 33 History and Responsibility Brinker Capital is an ERISA 3(38) Investment Manager Brinker Capital introduced risk-based, model portfolios 17 years ago Brinker Capital was one of the first Investment Managers to introduce lower-cost, ETF based models for 401k’s Brinker Capital assumes fiduciary responsibility for our Managed Accounts and Plus Funds Summary 1. Do you expect risk to decline? 2. What is your role with regard to the plan? 3. Partner with a 3(38) fiduciary, and provide diversified models Case Studies David C. Franceski, Jr., Esquire Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young, LLP 215.564.8120 DFranceski@STRADLEY.COM William P. Simon, Jr. Brinker Capital, Inc. 800.333.4573 bsimon@brinkercapital.com