Session 7: Internal Audit planning

advertisement
Session 7: Internal Audit planning
Presented by:
• Cathy Blunt
Griffith University
• Carol Brown Deaking University
• Peter McGrath University of Melbourne
Approaches to Audit Planning
Cathy Blunt
Manager Internal Audit
Griffith University
ANZUIAG 2010
Internal Audit Unit
Assurance & Operational Audit Planning
 Step 1 – Update audit universe (organisation chart & processes)
 Step 2 – Risk assess business units and processes
» Questionnaire based on risk & control factors
» Risk factors – materiality, organisational structure, complexity, IT
systems, products/services, change, volume, performance gap,
compliance, risk assessment results.
» Control factors – environment, risk assessment results, control
activities, monitoring, ITC.
» Heat Maps – risk factor by control effectiveness
Internal Audit Unit
Heat Map Example – Assurance & Operational Audits
High
Disaster Recovery
Business Continuity
Impact of Risk Effect
Eskitis Institute
Qld College of Art
Tendering
Payables
Receivable
Losses
Insurance
Parking
Petty Cash
Asset Mgt
Capital Works
Projects Mgt
Workplace Health &
Safety
Corporate Credit Card
School of Medicine
Australian Rivers
Institute
Travel Mgt
Low
High
Internal Audit Unit
Control Effectiveness
Low
Assurance & Operational Audit Planning
 Step 3 – Compare highest risk activities to current strategic plan
and immediate past plans
 Step 4 – Develop first draft of strategic & annual audit plans &
budget
 Step 5 – Consult with senior management
 Step 6 – Audit Committee endorsement & budget discussion
 Step 7 – Vice Chancellor approval
 Step 8 – Distribute approved plan to management
Internal Audit Unit
IT Audit Planning
 Step 1 – Update audit universe (projects, applications, centres &
processes)
 Step 2 – Risk assess projects, applications & processes
» ISACA Procedure P1 – IS Risk Assessment Measurement
» Meetings with INS to discuss & risk rate activities, etc
» Update risk assessment spreadsheet with risk ratings and weighted
risk factors
» Charts for each projects, applications, centres & processes
Internal Audit Unit
IT Audit Planning
 Projects – 15 Factors
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
Project Budget
Transaction Volume
Project Duration
Character of Activity
Resource Effort
Executive Mgt Interest
Fallback Arrangements
Level of Change
Complexity
Project Mgt & Build
Project Governance
Impact on Financial Reporting
Impact on Revenue
Impact on Customers
Ongoing Support Arrangements
Internal Audit Unit
 Applications – 9 Factors
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
Effect of System Failure
Replacement Cost
Scope of System
Age of Application
Type of Build/Maintenance
Prior Audit Findings
Changes in Environment/Staff
Size of Application
System Interfaces
IT Audit Planning
 Processes – 7 Factors
»
»
»
»
Effect of Process Failure
Process Impact/Scope
Process Performance
Process Documentation &
Training
» Prior Audit Findings
» Age of Process
» Process Risk
Internal Audit Unit
 Data Centres – 8 Factors
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
Number of Data Centre Staff
Effected of Prolonged Outage
Number of Applications
Number of Users
Prior Audit Findings
Sophistication of Processing
Changes in equipment, platform
& staff
» Number of platforms
IT Audit Planning – Example Charts
140
120
100
80
Risk Ranked IT Processes
60
40
20
0
Risk Ranked IT Projects
Internal Audit Unit
84
82
80
78
76
74
72
70
68
66
64
Deakin University
Internal Audit
Planning Process
Overview
Audit Universe
Audit and Risk Planning Meeting
Discuss the following:
• What Internal Audit has done up to this point.
• New audits/Merged audits/Removed audits to the Audit Universe.
• High Residual Risk audits not planned to be covered in forthcoming year.
• Proposed draft Plan for forthcoming year.
• Assurance map (High Residual Risks based on Risk Registers).
• ARC members concerns or areas they would like some focus.
Example of Audits Added/New
Master
Ref
Code
Residual
Risk
200
High
Area / Audit Title
IT Project's Implementation
Status "Health Checks"
Audit Objective
To review the status of selected IT
projects to ascertain whether the
project development and
implementation objectives are being
achieved and whether project risks
are being addressed.
Comment
The objective of this review is to assess whether significant IT
projects being implemented are meeting their development
objectives and timelines during the implementation process
and whether the significant risks of the project are being
addressed throughout the implementation. 2011 will focus on
Learning Management System with possible other systems
being CRM, DFMS Upgrade, Business Intelligence and Deakin
at Your Doorstep -subject to progress on project.
Draft IA Plan for Forthcoming Year
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
FBSD
Financial and Business Services Division
181 Credit Card Transactions
To review credit card transactions by cardholders related
to selected areas of the University.
9
FBS-1
FBS-28
2
1
2010
Resource
Reviewed
Area/Audit Title/Objective/Scope
Strategic
Goal/
Risk Ref
Last
Master Ref
Code
Draft 2011 Annual Internal Audit Plan
Internal Audit assessment of residual risk rating
High Residual risk
Medium Residual risk
I
Budget
Days /
Residual
Risk
15
Quarter
Comment
Qtr 1
7.5
Qtr 2
Qtr 3
7.5
Qtr 4
2 areas per year are covered.
This is a 100% transaction review
for all cardholders within the
nominated areas for a period of up
to six months.
Assurance Map
Assurance Map
This “Map” details the various assurance activities across the University for risks which have been rated high residual risk and above.
Very High
High Level of Assurance
High
Medium Level of Assurance

Low Level of Assurance
Faculty of Arts and Education
A&E-1
The failure to maintain and improve the Faculty's research may
impact on reputation both nationally and internationally which could
lead to a detrimental effect on achieving the Faculty Top Third
research aspirations.
High
High
Audit Master
Reference
Code
RSD-101, UNI196, RSD-203


Internal Audit
Inherent Residual
Risk
Risk
Rating
Rating
External
Audit
Assurance and Review Activities
Risk Title
Committee
Oversight
Area
Risk
Code

Management
Monitoring


Master Audit Plan Submitted to ARC for Approval
• Master Audit Plan is submitted at the November ARC meeting
for approval.
• Includes:
–
–
–
–
–
Overview of Planning methodology
Overview on resources
Draft Plan for forthcoming year
Audit Universe
Assurance Map
ANZUIAG 2010
Host:
University of the Sunshine Coast Queensland
(Session 7) Internal Audit Panning
(Balancing a risk based approach with core requirements and External
Audit hopes.)
Peter McGrath
Director Internal Audit
Audit Planning
Core Requirements
1. Professional Obligations
"Internal auditing is an independent, objective assurance and
consulting activity designed to add value and improve an
organization’s operations. It helps an organization accomplish its
objectives by bringing a systematic, disciplined approach to evaluate
and improve the effectiveness of risk management, control and
governance process." (1)
2. Stakeholder Expectations
Audit and Risk Committee, Senior Executive, Operational Managers,
VAGO, IA Team.
(1) Source: International Professional Practices Framework (IPPF), The Institute of Internal Auditors Research Foundation,
Florida USA, January 2009
Audit Planning
 Understand key customer expectations, issues & concerns
- How? consult broadly - talk to them
 Develop a good knowledge of:
- Key business objectives
- Risk Management framework and risk profiles
- Key risk mitigation strategies
- What’s going on
 Align audit strategy to customer expectations and risk profiles
Audit Planning
 Gathering business intelligence – what’s going on?
- Discussions
- Committee papers
- Plans and budgets
- Risk profiles and mitigation strategies
- Management initiated reviews
- Correspondence
- AG’s management letter
- Media reports
- Rumours etc.
No
.
Main Areas of Audit Interest – 2011 Plan
1
3
1
3
1
5
2
1
1
Major
8
Risk
1
1
0
7
3
9
Moderate
4
1
4
8
5
6
1
4
6
5
1
2
1
3
7
1
0
Insignificant
Adequate
Fair
Poor
Control
Risk Level
Low
High
Training
3
Research
Management
Failure of processes to effectively and
efficiently coordinate the University’s research
activity to meet strategic and compliance
objectives.
4
Business
Continuity
Failure of Emergency Response, Crisis
Management and Business Continuity
strategies to appropriately respond to a major
event
5
Budget Division
Governance
Failure of management, processes and
systems to meet corporate objectives and
compliance obligations within the RDM
environment.
6
Records
Management
Failure to maintain corporate records to
meeting compliance and reporting obligations,
and corporate memory.
7
Themis Renewal
Failure of the various related projects to deliver
the promised business benefits.
8
ISIS (Student
System)
Failure of ISIS to deliver the promised business
benefits.
9
IT Security &
DRP
Failure of IT systems.
2
Minor
Excellent
2
Failure to provide appropriate training
framework and programs increasing the risk of
inappropriate staff behaviour , break of
compliance obligations, and exposure to
litigation.
1
2
1
5
1
1
Failure of project governance and management
processes to deliver projects on time and on
budget.
4
9
Moderate Significant
Failure of procurement activity to be effectively
Procurement and
and efficiently implemented increasing the risk
10 Cost
of wastage, fraud and non achievement of cost
Containment
containment targets.
P&CS
11
Scheduling
Ris
k
(1)
Inherent
(1) Risk
(2)
Failure of systems to provide appropriate
coordination of maintenance, minor works and
construction activity and for meeting
contractual reporting obligations.
12
Marketing &
Communications
Failure of marketing and communications
strategies to achieve key objectives.
13
Financial
Assurance
Failure of financial systems to process
transactions and enable accurate reporting.
Residual
registers
(2) Management assessment
Primary Risk
Capital Projects
1
Severe
Auditable Area
Failure to meet key compliance obligations
Audit Planning
 Audit Resource Management System (ARMS)
 Audit universe
 Prioritised based on five risk factors using 1 – 5 score:
- Inherent risk
- Residual risk
- Materiality
- Prior audit results (assurance)
- Audit judgement (gut feel informed by business intelligence)
 15 % annual weighting
 Time budget and recording
 Report tracking
Audit Planning
Audit Assurance
With a devolved organisational structure “assurance” is important.
Divisional Audit
 Risk based
 Performed at the Budget Division level
 Analytical review of finance, HR and other systems data (Profiling)
 Review processes and controls for efficiency and effectiveness
 Business objectives being met?
Where all the cultural issues play out
- Consultative approach
Audit Planning
Financial and Administrative Systems
 Risk based
 Confirm effectiveness and efficiency of key controls and
processes; Finance, Purchasing Card, HR/Payroll, Students,
Advance.
Information Technology (IT) Audit





Risk based
Database security controls reviews
IT general controls reviews
Pre- and post-implementation systems reviews
Computer security reviews
Audit Planning
Performance and System Reviews
 Risk based
 Focus on efficiency and effectiveness of what and how activities are
performed
 Confirm the overall focus of the operations is in line with the
University's strategic and operational plans.
Other Audits
On request from management perform performance /management
audits, special investigations or act in a consulting role.
Audit Planning
Audit Consulting – (Knowledge Transfer / Engagement)
Greater opportunity to be proactive!
Where we need to move if we want to address cultural issues.
New audit paradigm
- meet stakeholder expectations
- meet professional standards
Audit Planning
Audit Consulting – (Knowledge Transfer / Engagement) cont
Challenges
 How to better engage / partner with stakeholders / managers?
 Manage people and their egos
 Maintain the fine balance between being a colleague/consultant and
policeman
 Remaining independent and objective
 Not assuming management responsibility but educating, cajoling and
what ever else it may take to get managers and all staff to take
responsibility to improve the effectiveness of risk management, control
and governance processes.
Audit Planning
Audit Consulting – (Knowledge Transfer / Engagement) cont
Mindset Shift
 Leader & facilitator
 Coach
 Extrovert
 Creative / innovative and energetic
Overriding caveat – independence
Audit Planning
Audit Consulting – (Knowledge Transfer / Engagement) cont
Establish relationships
 Get their attention
 Appeal to their personnel reputational risk
Face to face discussions
 What are their issues?
 How can audit add value for them?
 Training / information deficits?
 What do they need to do to achieve their goals and those of their department?
Audit Planning
Consulting – Knowledge Transfer / Engagement (Cont)
Planned Outcomes
 Managers and staff better placed to perform their roles and meet their
responsibilities
 Proactively work with managers to address local issues
 Take learning and apply to University wide
 Communicate assurance to key stakeholders
Audit Planning
Summary - Operational Emphasis
 Alignment of audit plan with stakeholder expectations and the University’s
strategic and operational risk profiles
 Identify and incorporate key risks and the value add proposition into each
audit plan
 Establishing a resourcing model which incorporates staffing flexibility: cosourcing, agency staff, specialist expertise
 Increased use of data extraction and manipulation for analysis to establish
business profiles and areas of interest
 Stakeholder engagement with emphasis on face to face interaction
 Consulting, coaching and supporting
 Stakeholder satisfaction
Audit Planning
Questions?
© Copyright The University of Melbourne 2009
Download