Enhancing Coal Production – Advent of Real Competition November 2013 1 Imperative for successful business model in Coal Mining Maximise interest of all stake holders thru’ Competitive Bidding thru’ Price Control thru’ reasonable return & incentive for enhanced production 2 Pitfalls in Captive Coal Mine (CCM) Auctioning • No guarantee that power producers will be the most efficient while bidding for sale of power • Coal Block may remain unutilized till such time PPAs are awarded • Coal production may not be optimum and constrained by the demand from its power plant • Cost plus days are gone. • Sale of Power is thru’ Competitive Bidding • Developer may keep the most of benefit of having a low cost mine to himself • Under the new power procurement guidelines, no segment for CCM obtained thru’ auction basis 3 Modified MDO Government Coal Mine Auctioned to Bidder quoting Maximum Premium / Revenue Share subject to supplying to specific users at pre-determined price Private Player Responsible for development of mine, extraction and selling the output Allowed to sell to specified user(s) at a pre-determined pricing formula for output approved as per plan; Additional output may be sold in open market or designated Consignee End User • Mine ownership with Govt; Successful bidder gets control on Economic value of Coal during the Concession Period; End users to be determined by Government from time to time • MDO term to be Long Term as it is a Mining Concession • Stringent Technical Qualification requirement to ensure quality and productivity • Higher production to be incentivized at import parity price • Adjustment factor for change in actual quantity / quality if materially diff. from tender estimates 4 Thank You 5