Pharmaceutical R&D Process – Why do Clinical Trials Fail? Erika Buonansegna, PhD Student DTU Management Engineering Supervisors: Søren Salomo, DTU Management Engineering Anja Maier, DTU Management Engineering Jason Li-Ying, DTU Management Engineering Carsten Schultz, Kiel University, Germany Collaborating partner: Medidata Solutions, Inc., New York 1 gate Idea generation and evaluation Concept development and product planning gate gate Prototype development gate Test of the prototype P.I.R Production and Market Introduction Test of the prototype Research & Drug Discovery Preclinical Studies Phase I Phase II Phase III Market Approval Clinical Trials (Cooper, 1994) 2 INTRO TO THE PHARMACETICAL R&D: DRUG DISCOVERY AND DEVELOPMENT PROCESS Research & Drug Discovery 0.5-2 years 6-7 years 3-6 years Preclinical Studies Phase I Phase II Market Approval Phase III Clinical Trials 5.000-10.000 compounds 250 5 1 (Efpia, 2011) 3 CLINICAL TRIAL NETWORK Sponsor Site 4 CLINICAL TRIAL NETWORK Sponsor CRO Site 5 CLINICAL TRIAL NETWORK Sponsor CRO Site 6 RESEARCH MOTIVATION • Few studies on CT failure • Little knowledge on determinants of failure in late development stages • Search for tools to manage CTs Reasons for drug failure adverse events 16% pharmacokineti cs miscellaneous 7% 7% commercial reasons 7% toxicity miscellaneous 9% lack of efficiency 46% 17% (Centre for Medicine Research in Kennedy, 1997) commercial reasons 34% lack of efficiency 37% lack of safety 20% (DiMasi, 2001) 7 RESEARCH AIM AND QUESTIONS Refine the understanding on failures in clinical trials as a late development stage. Research Questions: (1) “What causes failure of clinical trials?” (2) “Can such causes be systematically mapped?” (3) “Does the assessment of clinical trial failures provide insights into a more general concept of NPD failure during later stages of the development process?” 8 METHODOLOGY Address clinical trials specificities 9 Literature review Expert study 17 interviews Conceptual framework CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK Not potential product Potential product Success False-positive failures Completion of a project -Difficult subject recruitment for testing -Lack of experience in choosing and monitoring the partners -Lack of feasibility of the testing procedure -High demand for documentation -Many incidents while testing -Unmanageable level of portfolio complexity -Incorrect assessment of the market potential or returns Termination of a project False-negative failures -Difficult subject recruitment for testing -Lack of experience in choosing and monitoring the partners -Lack of feasibility of the testing procedure -High demand for documentation -Many incidents while testing -Unmanageable level of portfolio complexity -Incorrect assessment of the market potential or returns 10 Inevitable failures -Toxicity -Lack of efficacy -Economics MANAGERIAL IMPLICATIONS Proactive strategies • Improving skills of the development team • Due diligence in choosing sites and subcontractors • E-recruitment tactics • Monitoring sites and subcontractors • Interim and risk analyses • Training for SAEs • Feedback from investigators Reactive strategies • Fast reallocation of resources • Back-up candidates and parallel-track strategy • Learning-by-failing mind set 11 FUTURE RESEARCH • Clinical trial research – Interdependencies – Ranking according to phases – In-depth case studies • Late development stages in other industries 12 Erika Buonansegna PhD Student Technical University of Denmark DTU Management Engineering Produktionstorvet, Bygning 426 2800 Kgs. Lyngby Denmark erbou@dtu.dk 13