9100 Series
2016 Revision Overview
9100 Team
July, 2014
IAQG is a trademark the International Aerospace Quality Group.
Copyright © 2014 IAQG. All rights reserved.
1
9100 Revision – The Plan
9100 Series Revision High Level Plan
 The 9100 is based on ISO 9001 and is thus affected by the
ISO TC176 revision activity
 Revision guidance published in 9100:2016 Design
Specification
 5 IAQG standards are based on the 9100 standard and will
require revision in parallel with 9100 (9110, 9120, 9115,
9137, 9101 = 9100 Series)
 Revision focus is to add clarity, enhance ease of use, while
addressing industry and stakeholder needs
 The IAQG 9100 Series standards are planned for project
completion in 2016
IAQG is a trademark the International Aerospace Quality Group.
Copyright © 2014 IAQG. All rights reserved.
2
9100 Series
9100 Series includes the following IAQG standards:
 IAQG 9100 QMS –Req’ts for Aviation, Space and Defense Orgs IAQG Series Baseline Standard
̶ IAQG 9110 QMS – Req’ts for Aviation Maintenance Organizations
̶ IAQG 9115 QMS – Req’ts for Aviation, Space and Defense Orgs Deliverable Software
̶ IAQG 9120 QMS – Req’ts for Aviation, Space and Defense
Distributors
̶ IAQG 9137 Guidance for the Application of AQAP 2110 within a
9100 QMS
̶ IAQG 9101 QMS Audit Requirements for Aviation, Space and
Defense Organizations
̶ IAQG 9104
Oversight of Certification Scheme
3
IAQG is a trademark the International Aerospace Quality Group.
Copyright © 2014 IAQG. All rights reserved.
3
IAQG 9100 Series Team
IAQG 9100 Series Team
Alan Daniels
Wayne Johnson
9100 IDR – Team Leader
9100 Scribe
Boeing
IAQG
Buddy Cressionnie
Brigitte Clamens
Masahiro Kawamoto
9100 AAQG SDR
9100 EAQG SDR
9100 APAQG SDR
Lockheed Martin
Zodiac Aerospace
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries
Jim Clifford
Roberto Ciaschi
Chen Zhongyuan
9100 AAQG Representative
9100 EAQG Representative
9100 APAQG Representative
United Technologies Corporation
European Space Agency
Aviation Industry Corporation (AVIC)
Kim Roy
Stuart Anthony
Tatsuya Shirai
9100 AAQG Representative
9100 EAQG Representative
9100 APAQG Representative
Triumph
Rolls-Royce
Kawasaki Heavy Industries
Integration of Standards
Agathe Moll
Masahiro Kawamoto
9120 IDR
9110 IDR
9101 IDR
Aerojet
Airbus
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries
Ray Wright
9115 IDR
Raytheon
IAQG is a trademark the International Aerospace Quality Group.
Copyright © 2014 IAQG. All rights reserved.
Insert
Picture
Here
Dale Gordon
Juan Ignacio Martin
9137 IDR
Airbus Military
4
IAQG/Sector 9100 Team Structure
IAQG 9100 Writing Team
collects sector and
stakeholder input and
creates a rough draft. (8)
IAQG
9100
Team
IAQG 9100 Team collects
sector and stakeholder
input and writes the
revision (16)
Representatives of
Sector 9100 Team at Int’l
Meetings (6)
Sector 9100 Team
Meetings to gather
Sector inputs and
develop Sector
positions. Operation
managed at Sector Level
(58)
IAQG is a trademark the International Aerospace Quality Group.
Copyright © 2014 IAQG. All rights reserved.
AAQG
9100 Team
AAQSC
Sector
9100 Team
EAQG
9100 Team
EAQG
Sector
9100 Team
APAQG
9100 Team
APAQG
Sector
9100 Team
5
AAQSC Sector 9100 Team
AAQG/AAQSC Leader:
AAQG Members:
AAQSC Members:
- Kevin Beard (NQA)
- Eric Jeffries (Bell/Textron)
- John Graham (PNAA)
- Robert Bodemuller (Ball)
- Helen Kiesel (Goodrich)
- Erin Anderson (Honeywell)
- Craig Bennett (DCMA HQ)
- Bill Sacco (GE Aviation)
IAQG is a trademark the International Aerospace Quality Group.
Copyright © 2014 IAQG. All rights reserved.
- Buddy Cressionnie (LM)
- Jim Clifford (UTC)
- Kim Roy (Triumph)
- Dale Gordon, 9120 IDR (Aerojet)
-
Liz Walters (Boeing)
Debra Hensley (Bell/Textron)
Brian Geer (LM)
Dave Leeson (GD)
Kim Roy (Triumph)
Greg Burns (PneuDraulics)
Aaron Troschinetz (SAI Global)
Rob Chagnon (Rockwell Collins)
6
IAQG 9100 Revision SIPOC
Team is currently well into “Do” and will transition to
“Check”
Stakeholder
IAQG 9100
Series
Standard
Plan
Input & Survey
Project
Plan
Integrated
Schedule
SWG Enlarged
Strategy
Act
Design Specification
Do
ISO 9001
Gap Analysis
Aviation,
Space &
Defense
Industries
Priority Focus
Master
Teams
Comments Review
IAQG 9100 Team
Data Mining - Master Comments Review Template
As of 2013-12-21
Deployment
Support
Material
IAQG 9100 Team Disposition
Options Risk
Assessment
Ballot
Item #
Stakeholder
Code
Clause No.
45
Survey
Title
Remove "Quality" from title
Managment System
Reject ISO
ISO text.
53
Survey
Title
Title Change
Comment
Modify title to Business Managment System vs. Quality
Management System
Reject ISO
ISO text.
64
Survey
Title
Change title of standard from "Quality Manangement
System" to "Business Management System"
Proposed Change
Rationale / Benefit
e.g., clarification, improve quality, reduce
cost, other
Reject ISO
ISO text.
Reject
SMS will be covered by sub-team
The first word is "Quallity" and everyone
immediately thinls it is a Quality
function/responsibility, not a
Management function.
Requirements are incorporated for entire
business, and individuals continuously
focus on Quality when addressing
standard.
We've come a long way, but some still
feel implimentation and adhearance to
the standard is the job of Quality.
Use: "Quality Management Systems …" and make changes When SMS is introduced it is no longer
for consistency throughout the document
restricted to a quality system.
Accept/
Reject/
Noted
Team Proposal
X
X
X
111
CAA
Title
Expand the title to cover SMS
323
EAQG
Title
Title is more biased towards Aerospace than inclusive of
Defense
Amend wording from Aerospace Standard to Defense
Standard
187
AAQG
Foreword
verbiage confusing (no header at start of 1st statement to
define the incomplete sentence and extra commas)
"To assure customer satisfaction, aviation, space and
clarification
defense organizations must produce, and continually
improve, safe, reliable products …" should be "Objective: To
assure customer satisfaction, aviation, space and defense
organizations must produce and continually improve safe,
reliable products …"
Accept in Writing Team to consider comments
Principle
113
CAA
0.1
There is no need to explain the potential application of the
standard when it has many different uses.
This International Standard can be used by internal and
The current "used by" is not exhaustive
external parties, including certification bodies, to
and might be misinterpreted.
assess the organization's ability to meet customer, statutory
and regulatory requirements applicable to the
product, and the organization's own requirements.
Pending
DIS
254
EAQG
0.2
ISO Text
Clause N°0.2:
First §, the sentence: "The international Standard
- Introduce the adoption of a process approach as a
promotes the adoption of a process approach" , can be
requirement needed to develop, implement and improve the
understood as a recommandation and not a requirement.
effectiveness of a quality management system;
That is not consistent with the "General requirements",
- Preconize to identify 3 processes family /groupe:
clause n°4.1 where a process approach implementation is
Management process; Realization process and Support
clearly required: "The organization shall determine the
process.
processes needed for the quality management system and
their application throughout the organization"
This requirement appears also in several sub-clauses (e;g.,
7.1 - 7.1.2 - 7.1.3 - 7.1.4 - 7.4.1.e - 7.5.1.h - 7.5.7.1 - 7.5.2 7.6 - 8.1):
"The organization shall establish, implement and maintain a
process for"
Clarification
1
LinkedIn
0.4
Clause 0.4 from ISO 9001 (covering compatability with other Re-introduce ISO 9001 Clause 0.4 to clarify the relativity of
management systems) has been omitted from AS/EN 9100. 9100 with other management Standards.
Clarification
Inclusive of all sectors
Action
Complete
X
Reject
X
Pending
DIS
If intent of proposal is accepted - any "shall" or requirement
must be established in the requirements section of the
standard (Clause 1-10)
Improve quality
Publishing
Sectors
Pending
DIS
Coordination
Draft
Check
SUPPLIERS
INPUTS
IAQG is a trademark the International Aerospace Quality Group.
Copyright © 2014 IAQG. All rights reserved.
PROCESS
OUTPUTS
CUSTOMERS
7
IAQG
Review Of ISO
9001 DIS
IAQG is a trademark the International Aerospace Quality Group.
Copyright © 2014 IAQG. All rights reserved.
8
ISO New Clause Structure
1.Scope
2.Normative references
4. Context of the organization
P
L
A
N
4.1 Understanding the organization and its
context
4.2 Understanding the needs and
expectations of interested parties
4.3 Determining the scope of the quality
management system
4.4 Quality management system and its
processes
5. Leadership
5.1 Leadership and commitment
5.2 Quality policy
5.3 Organizational roles, responsibilities and
authorities
6. Planning for the quality management
system
6.1 Actions to address risks and
opportunities
6.2 Quality objectives and planning to
achieve them
6.3 Planning of changes
7. Support
7.1 Resources
7.2 Competence
7.3 Awareness
7.4 Communication
7.5 Documented information
IAQG is a trademark the International Aerospace Quality Group.
Copyright © 2014 IAQG. All rights reserved.
3.Terms and definitions
D
O
C
H
E
C
K
8. Operation
8.1 Operational planning and control
8.2 Determination of requirements for
products and services
8.3 Design and development of products
and services
8.4 Control of externally provided products
and services
8.5 Production and service provision
8.6 Production of products and provision of
services
8.6 Release of products and services
8.7 Control of nonconforming process
outputs, products and services
9. Performance evaluation
9.1 Monitoring, measurement, analysis &
evaluation
9.2 Internal audit
9.3 Management review
10. Improvement
A
10.1 General
C
10.2 Nonconformity and corrective action
10.2 Continual Improvement
T
9
QMS Structure
PLAN
4 Context of the
organization
5 Leadership
6 Planning
7 Support
4.1Understanding
of the organization
and its context
5.1 Leadership and
commitment
6.1 Actions to
address risk and
opportunity
4.2 Expectations of
interested parties
5.2 Quality policy
6.2 Quality
objectives and
planning to
achieve
4.3 Scope of the
quality
management
system system
5.3 Roles,
responsibilities
and authorities
6.3 Planning of
changes
4.4 Quality
management
system and its
processes
DO
CHECK
8 Operation
9 Performance and
evaluation
10 Improvement
7.1 Resources
8.1 Operational of
planning and
control
9.1Monitoring,
measurement,
analysis and
evaluation
10.1 General
7.2 Competence
8.2 Determination
of requirements for
products and
services
9.2 Internal audit
10.2 Nonconformity
and corrective action
7.3 Awareness
8.3 Design and
development of
products and
services
9.3 Management
review
10.3 Continual
improvement
7.4 Communication
8.4 Control of
externally provided
products and
services
7.5 Documented
information
8.5 Production and
service provision
8.6 Production of
products and
provision of
services
8.7 Control of
nonconforming
process outputs,
products and
services
IAQG is a trademark the International Aerospace Quality Group.
Copyright © 2014 IAQG. All rights reserved.
ACT
ISO Timeline
Jun 2013
Sep 2013
Nov 2013
Jul 2014
Oct 2014
Nov 2014
Feb 2015
Jul 2015
Sep 2015
CD ballot starts
Close of CD ballot
Prepare DIS (Rough Draft)
DIS Ballot
DIS Ballot Closed
Prepare FDIS
FDIS to ISO Central Secretariat
FDIS Ballot
Publish ISO 9001:2015
These dates are contingent on consensus on decisions / ballots to proceed
at each stage.
IAQG is a trademark the International Aerospace Quality Group.
Copyright © 2014 IAQG. All rights reserved.
11
IAQG ISO 9001 DIS Review
 The 9100 baseline ISO
9001:2015 has released their
Draft International Standard (DIS)
for review
 The International Aerospace
Quality Group (IAQG), as a new
Liaison member of the ISO
group, has an opportunity to
provide comments to the DIS
 Action - 9100 Writing Team to
review the DIS and provide
comments for the IAQG
 Action – Report DIS assessment
in the July IAQG SWG meeting
and provide a 9100 Team
position
IAQG is a trademark the International Aerospace Quality Group.
Copyright © 2014 IAQG. All rights reserved.
ISO/TC 176/SC 2
1
2
Date: 2014-05-8
3
ISO/DIS 9001
4
ISO/TC 176/SC 2/WG 24
5
Secretariat: BSI
7
Quality management systems —
Requirements
8
Systèmes de management de la qualité — Exigences
6
9
10
Warning
11
12
This document is not an ISO International Standard. It is distributed for review and comment. It is
subject to change without notice and may not be referred to as an International Standard.
13
14
Recipients of this draft are invited to submit, with their comments, notification of any relevant patent
rights of which they are aware and to provide supporting documentation.
15
16
Warning
17
18
19
THIS DOCUMENT IS A DRAFT CIRCULATED FOR COMMENT AND APPROVAL. IT IS
THEREFORE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AND MAY NOT BE REFERRED TO AS AN INTERNATIONAL
STANDARD UNTIL PUBLISHED AS SUCH.
20
21
22
23
24
IN ADDITION TO THEIR EVALUATION AS BEING ACCEPTABLE FOR INDUSTRIAL,
TECHNOLOGICAL, COMMERCIAL AND USER PURPOSES, DRAFT INTERNATIONAL
STANDARDS MAY ON OCCASION HAVE TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE LIGHT OF THEIR
POTENTIAL TO BECOME STANDARDS TO WHICH REFERENCE MAY BE MADE IN NATIONAL
REGULATIONS.
25
26
27
RECIPIENTS OF THIS DRAFT ARE INVITED TO SUBMIT, WITH THEIR COMMENTS,
NOTIFICATION OF ANY RELEVANT PATENT RIGHTS OF WHICH THEY ARE AWARE AND TO
PROVIDE SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION.
12
IAQG ISO 9001 DIS Review
We provided to the 9100 Team
for the assessment:
 ISO 9001:2015 DIS
 ISO 9001:2008 to ISO
9001:2015 Cross Reference
(before and after)
 Overlay of the ISO 9001:2008
to ISO 9001:2015 standards
 Overlay of the ISO 9001:2015
CD, which was cause for
concern, and the much
improved ISO 9001:2015 DIS
Copyright - limited to team standard
development activity
IAQG is a trademark the International Aerospace Quality Group.
Copyright © 2014 IAQG. All rights reserved.
ISO 9001:2015 Cross Reference to ISO 9001:2008
May 15, 2014
•
The following includes a cross reference from the ISO 9001:2015 Draft International Standard
(DIS) to ISO 9001:2008.
•
This is not the official cross reference that will be provided in the final version of ISO 9001:2015.
In the interim, this document can be used to highlight where the new and revised clauses are
located.
•
Please note Annex A of the DIS states the following:
A.1 Structure and terminology
•
The clause structure and some of the terminology of this International Standard, in comparison
with ISO 9001:2008, have been changed to improve alignment with other management systems
standards.
•
The consequent changes in the structure and terminology do not need to be reflected in the
documentation of an organization’s quality management system.
•
The structure of clauses is intended to provide a coherent presentation of requirements rather
than a model for documenting an organization’s policies, objectives and processes. There is no
requirement for the structure of an organization's quality management system documentation
to mirror that of this International Standard.
ISO 9001:2008
4.1 General
Introduction
ISO 9001:2015
4.1 Understanding the organization and its
context
4.1 General
4.2 Understanding the needs and expectations
of interested parties
1.2 Application
4.3 Determining the scope of the quality
management system
4.2.2 Quality Manual
4.1 General
4.4 Quality management system and its
processes
5 Leadership
5.1 Management Commitment
5.1 Leadership and commitment
13
9100 Revision
ISO 9001 Correlation Matrix
Comparison Matrix
ISO 9001:2008 to ISO 9001:2015
ISO 9001:2008 to ISO 9001:2015
Correlation Matrix
5.1
Management commitment
5.1
5.1
Management commitment
5.1.1 Leadership and commitment for the
quality management system
5.2
Customer focus
5.1.2 Customer focus
5.3
Quality policy
5.2
Quality policy
5.3
Organizational roles, responsibilities
and authorities
5.4.2 Quality management system planning
6
5.4.2 Quality management system planning
6.1
Planning for the quality management
system
Actions to address risks and
opportunities
June 16, 2014
•
The following includes a correlation matrix from the ISO 9001:2008 to ISO 9001:2015 Draft
International Standard (DIS)
•
This correlation matrix will be provided in the published version of ISO 9001:2015. In the
interim, this document can be used to highlight where the new and revised clauses are located.
•
Please note Annex A of the DIS states the following:
A.1 Structure and terminology
•
The clause structure and some of the terminology of this International Standard, in comparison
with ISO 9001:2008, have been changed to improve alignment with other management systems
standards.
•
The consequent changes in the structure and terminology do not need to be reflected in the
documentation of an organization’s quality management system.
•
The structure of clauses is intended to provide a coherent presentation of requirements rather
than a model for documenting an organization’s policies, objectives and processes. There is no
requirement for the structure of an organization's quality management system documentation
to mirror that of this International Standard.
ISO 9001:2008
4
4.1
Quality management system
General
4.1
1.2
ISO 9001:2015
4
4.1
Context of the organization
Understanding the organization and its
context
General
4.2
Understanding the needs and expectations
of interested parties
Application
4.3
Determining the scope of the quality
management system
Introduction
4.2.2 Quality manual
4.1
5.5
General
Responsibility, authority and
communication
IAQG is a trademark the International Aerospace Quality Group.
Copyright © 2014 IAQG. All rights reserved.
4.4
5
Quality management system and its
processes
Leadership
5.5.1 Responsibility and authority
5.5.2 Management representative
8.5.3 Preventive action
Leadership and commitment
5.4.1 Quality objectives
6.2
Quality objectives and planning to
achieve them
5.4.2 Quality management system planning
6.3
Planning of changes
New
6
Resource management
7
7.1
Support
Resources
6.1
Provision of resources
7.1.1 General
6.1
Provision of resources
7.1.2 People
6.3
Infrastructure
7.1.3 Infrastructure
6.4
Work environment
7.1.4 Environment for the operation of
processes
7.6
Control of monitoring and measuring
equipment
7.1.5 Monitoring and measuring resources
New
7.1.6 Organizational knowledge
6.2.1 General
7.2
Competence
6.2.2 Competence, training and awareness
7.3
Awareness
5.5.3 Internal communication
7.4
Communication
4.2
7.5
Documented information
6.2.2 Competence, training and awareness
Documentation requirements
14
9100 Revision
ISO 9001 Correlation Matrix
Comparison Matrix
ISO 9001:2008 to ISO 9001:2015
4.2.1 General
7.5.1 General
7.4.2 Purchasing information
8.4.3 Information for external providers
4.2.3 Control of documents
7.5.2 Creating and updating
7.3
8.5
7.5.3 Control of documented Information
7.5.1 Control of production and service
provision
8.5.1 Control of production and service
provision
7.5.3 Identification and traceability
8.5.2 Identification and traceability
7.5.4 Customer property
8.5.3 Property belonging to customers or
external providers
7.5.5 Preservation of product
8.5.4 Preservation
7.5.1 Control of production and service
provision
8.5.5 Post-delivery activities
New
8.5.6 Control of changes
7.4.3 Verification of purchased product
8.6
Release of products and services
8.3
8.7
Control of nonconforming process
outputs, products and services
New
8.1 General
9
9.1
Performance evaluation
Monitoring, measurement, analysis and
evaluation
9.1.1 General
4.2.4 Control of records
4.2.3 Control of documents
4.2.4 Control of records
7
7.1
Product realization
Planning of product realization
8
8.1
7.2
Customer-related processes
8.2
Operation
Operational planning and control
Design and development
Production and service provision
7.2.3 Customer communication
Determination of requirements for
products and services
8.2.1 Customer communication
7.2.1 Determination of requirements related
to the product
8.2.2 Determination of requirements related
to products and services
7.2.2 Review of requirements related to the
product
8.2.3 Review of requirements related to the
products and services
7.3.1 Design and development planning
8.3
7.3.1 Design and development planning
8.3.1 General
7.3.1 Design and development planning
8.3.2 Design and development planning
7.3.2 Design and development inputs
8.3.3 Design and development Inputs
8.1
7.3.4 Design and development review
8.3.4 Design and development controls
8.2.1 Customer satisfaction
9.1.2 Customer satisfaction
8.4
9.1.3 Analysis and evaluation
Control of nonconforming product
Design and development of products
and services
7.3.5 Design and development verification
7.3.6 Design and development validation
General
Analysis of data
8.2.2 Internal audit
9.2
Internal audit
7.3.3 Design and development outputs
8.3.5 Design and development outputs
5.6
9.3
Management review
7.3.7 Design and development changes
8.3.6 Design and development changes
7.4.1 Purchasing process
8.4
8.5 Improvement
8.5.1 Continual improvement
10
Improvement
10.1 General
8.5.2 Corrective action
10.2 Nonconformity and corrective action
7.4.1 Purchasing process
8.4.1 General
8.5.1 Continual improvement
10.3 Continual Improvement
7.4.1 Purchasing process
8.4.2 Type and extent of control of external
provision
IAQG is a trademark the International Aerospace Quality Group.
Copyright © 2014 IAQG. All rights reserved.
Control of externally provided products
and services
Management review
15
ISO 9001:2015
Key Changes Summary
Key Changes
 Greater emphasis on processes (51 in 2008 to 73 in 2015)
 Alignment with strategic direction (0 in 2008 to 3 in 2015)
 Integration of the QMS into organization’s business
processes (0 in 2008 to 1 in 2015)
 Determining risks and opportunities (0 in 2008 to 11 in 2015)
 Emphasis on change management (13 in 2008 to 23 in 2015)
 Introduction of knowledge management (0 in 2008 to 9 in 2015)
 Increased performance evaluation (4 in 2008 to 15 in 2015)
 Improvement expanded – clause (11 in 2008 to 15 in 2015)
(number of times the word shows up in clauses 4-8 & 4-10)
IAQG is a trademark the International Aerospace Quality Group.
Copyright © 2014 IAQG. All rights reserved.
16
IAQG ISO 9001 DIS Review
ISO 9001:2015 DIS review summary
 Comments consist of clarifications, improvements and
editorial proposals
 111 IAQG comments received on the ISO 9001 DIS
̶ 55 Improve
̶ 28 Clarify
̶ 4
Editorial
̶ 2
Delete
̶ 22 Filtered (no proposed text, ISO required text, duplicates)
̶ 89 IAQG Comments for the ISO 9001:2015 Team
IAQG is a trademark the International Aerospace Quality Group.
Copyright © 2014 IAQG. All rights reserved.
17
IAQG ISO 9001 DIS Review
ISO 9001:2015 DIS Review Summary
 18 identified by the 9100 Team as priorities
̶ Addition proposals:
•
•
•
•
•
̶
4.2.2
5.3
7.5.3.2
8.4.3
9.2.1.b
Quality manual
Management representative (2)
External documented QMS information – available for use
External provider communication - QMS requirements
Internal audit - considers related performance indicators
Revision proposals:
•
•
•
•
•
4.1
8.3.1
8.3.4
8.4.2.b
8.5.6
Issues – revise terminology (factors, elements, aspects, etc)
Design and development process - neg. to pos. statement
Design and development – action when outcome is not achieved
Perceived effectiveness- revise terminology (measured)
Change control – revise unplanned changes
IAQG is a trademark the International Aerospace Quality Group.
Copyright © 2014 IAQG. All rights reserved.
18
IAQG ISO 9001 DIS Review
ISO 9001:2015 DIS Review Summary - cont.
 18 identified by the 9100 Team as priority comments
̶ Definition proposals:
• Opportunities - 4.4, 5.1.2, 6.1, 9.1.3, ….
• Organizational knowledge - 7.1.6, 8.1, 8.5.6
• Unplanned changes - 8.1, 8.5.6
• Incorrect use - customer owned property - 8.5.3
̶ Clarification requests:
• 3.04 External providers – outsourced external providers (internal)
• 3.09 Risk – opportunities are positive effects of uncertainty - 7.1.6
• 4.2
Interested parties
IAQG is a trademark the International Aerospace Quality Group.
Copyright © 2014 IAQG. All rights reserved.
19
IAQG ISO 9001 DIS Review
ISO 9001:2015 DIS review summary
 The IAQG 9100 Team and 9100 Sector Teams all agreed there
are no show stopper or critical items
 Common terminology and its use could be better (reason for
clarification and definition requests)
 Comparison matrix indicates the 10 clause structure is workable
 Several improvements have been made in the ISO 9001:2015
̶ increased use of measures
̶ risk analysis
̶ Linkage to organizations strategic objectives and business processes
 Flexibility to add requirements and guidance in the 9100 text
 9100 Team recommendation is to continue use of the ISO 9001
as the 9100 series baseline
IAQG is a trademark the International Aerospace Quality Group.
Copyright © 2014 IAQG. All rights reserved.
20
ISO 9001:2015 Revision
Next Steps
Next Steps
IAQG ISO 9001:2015 prioritized comments will be
actively lobbied for implementation and tracked
The ISO 9001:2015 FDIS (Final Draft International
Standard) is scheduled to be available in February
2015 and begin ballot in July 2015
Writing to begin on 9100:2016 using ISO
9001:2015 DIS as a baseline July 14th, 2014
IAQG is a trademark the International Aerospace Quality Group.
Copyright © 2014 IAQG. All rights reserved.
21
ISO 9001:2015
Key Changes Summary
Telecommunications
 After reviewing the ISO
9001:2015 DIS the
QuEST Forum
(telecommunications) has
made the decision to
continue using ISO 9001
as their TL 9000
standards baseline
IAQG is a trademark the International Aerospace Quality Group.
Copyright © 2014 IAQG. All rights reserved.
22
IAQG
9100 Revision
IAQG is a trademark the International Aerospace Quality Group.
Copyright © 2014 IAQG. All rights reserved.
23
9100 Timeline
Oct 2013
Apr 2014
Jun 2014
Jul 2014
Jul 2014
Oct 2014
May 2015
Dec 2016
Apr 2016
Stakeholder Feedback Resolution
Concept Sub-team Proposals
Integrate ISO 9001 DIS with 9100
ISO 9001:2015 DIS Comments
Structure Draft (team)
Working Draft (team)
Coordination Draft (IAQG)
Ballot (IAQG)
Support Material
These dates are contingent on consensus on decisions / ballots to proceed
at each stage.
IAQG is a trademark the International Aerospace Quality Group.
Copyright © 2014 IAQG. All rights reserved.
24
9100 New Concepts
 Concepts being evaluated (sub-teams):
̶ Safety - product, flight (evaluate enhancement)
̶ Human Factors (consider inclusion)
̶ Risk (balance ISO 9001 addition)
̶ Preventive Action (assess ISO 9001 approach)
̶ Counterfeit Parts (consider inclusion)
̶ Configuration Management (request to enhance)
̶ Product Realization Planning (requested FAI, APQP
linkages)
̶ Post-Delivery Support (9110/MRO linkages)
̶ Supplier Management (request to enhance)
IAQG is a trademark the International Aerospace Quality Group.
Copyright © 2014 IAQG. All rights reserved.
25
9100 Series Revision
Integrated Schedule
2012
San Antonio Nagoya
05/2012 10/2012
2013
Moscow
05/2013
9100
SWG/Council
Project
Approval
2014
Montreal
10/2013
2015
Brussels Long Beach Chengdu TBD
04/2014 10/2014
04/2015 10/2015
2016
TBD
TBD
04/2016 10/22016
IAQG
9100
9100 Team
Comments
IAQG
Working Coordination 9100 9100 Publish 9100
/Structure Comments
Draft for
Draft
Ballot
/ Ballot
2nd Ballot
Analysis /Design Spec Review Comments
Draft Comments
Draft
2017
TBD
04/2017
TBD
10/2017
9100
Publish
Plan & Stakeholders feedback
Internal Dependencies
Standards & Training as needed for
publication
- Required for 9100 publication
- 9100 Transition Plan
- 9101 Update (as required)
- 9100 Training (as required)
9101 Audit – Revision
9110, 9120, 9115, 9137
Required for publication
Required for publication
Series Revisions
External dependencies
ISO 9001 publications
• CD June 2013 – Begin struct. draft
• DIS : May 2014 – Begin writing 9100
• FDIS : Feb 2015 - Begin Coord. Draft
• Publish : Sept. 2015 – Prep. Ballot
For more information,
see detailed schedule
IAQG is a trademark the International Aerospace Quality Group.
Copyright © 2014 IAQG. All rights reserved.
Training - OPMT
Development
Recommended Schedule
to satisfy need date
Preparing
Ballots, reviews and comments
Publications
Required for publication
Auditor training & Transition
26
9100 Revision Schedule
2012
San Antonio Nagoya
05/2012 10/2012
2013
Moscow
05/2013
Montreal
10/2013
2015
2014
Brussels Long Beach Chengdu TBD
04/2015 10/2015
04/2014
10/2014
TBD
TBD
04/2016 10/22016
9100 Team
IAQG
9100 Team IAQG 9100
Comments/
IAQG
Working Coordination 9100 9100 Publish
Structure Comments Draft
Ballot
/ Ballot
Draft for
Analysis - Design Spec Review
Draft Comments
Comment
9100
SWG/Council IAQG
Project Stakeholder
Approval Feedback
ISO 9001 CD/
IAQG Review
& Comment
ISO 9001 DIS/
9100 Team
Review &
Comment
ISO 9001
FDIS
2017
2016
TBD
04/2017
TBD
10/2017
9100 9100 Publish
/ Ballot
Ballot
Comments
Draft
ISO 9001
Publication
Opportunities for input
Complete
Not complete
IAQG is a trademark the International Aerospace Quality Group.
Copyright © 2014 IAQG. All rights reserved.
27
9100 Revision Schedule
9100 Series Schedule
Task
2013
Who
IAQG Meetings
ISO 9001:2015 Schedule
9100 Series Milestones
Project Approval (103 form)
Develop Team Selection Criteria
Establish IAQG Team
Develop Design Specification
Operating Procedure Updates
Sector Teams meet to review
Design Specification
Stakeholder Identification
Determine methods to request
feedback
Request stakeholder feedback
Review clarifications issued for
9100:2009
Collect Stakeholders Feedback
Develop Structure Draft with ISO
9001 CD text
Review Structure Draft
Review and Disposition
Stakeholder Feedback
Writing Team evaluates ISO 9001
DIS and provides input to TAG
Prepare a Working Draft outline
Writing Team develops a
Working Draft with ISO 9001 DIS
Feedback - 9100 Sector Team
Comments to Working Draft
Disposition - 9100 Sector Team
Comments to Working Draft
Writing Team develops a
Coordination Draft
Determine change impacts to
9101, 9104, 9102, 9103
Feedback - IAQG Comments to
Coordination Draft
Disposition IAQG Comments to
Coordination Draft
Incorporate ISO 9001 Changes FDIS
IAQG 9100:2016 ballot
Review and disposition IAQG
9100:2016 ballot comments
Coordination with SCMH
Determine Certification Scheme
impacts and changes needed
Transition Training
Deployment Support Materials
Q3
2014
Q4
Montreal
ISO 9001
9100 Team
Q1
Q2
Brussells
DIS May
SD
2015
Q3
Q4
Q1
Long
Beach
Q2
Q4
Q1
Q2
Chengdu
TBD
TBD
CD
Pub Sept
Ballot
Publish
FDIS Feb
WD
2016
Q3
Q3
Q4
TBD
Leader
Leader
Leader
Scribe
Jim C
9100
Sectors
9100 Team
9100 Team
Leader
Buddy C
Scribe
Scribe
9100 Team
9100 Team
Writing
Team
Scribe
Writing
Team
9100
Sectors
9100 Team
Writing
Team
Req's Team
9100 Team
9100 Team
Scribe
IAQG
9100 Team
9100 Team
OPMT
OPMT
9100
Sectors
IAQG is a trademark the International Aerospace Quality Group.
Copyright © 2013
2014 IAQG. All rights reserved.
28
Next Steps – 2014
9100 Team to review and comment to ISO 9001
DIS
Integrate ISO 9001 DIS with 9100 requirements
and accepted proposals into a rough draft for the
9100 Team review
Begin work on the 9110 Maintenance and 9115
Software standards
Launch 9120 in the fall IAQG meeting
IAQG is a trademark the International Aerospace Quality Group.
Copyright © 2014 IAQG. All rights reserved.
29
Questions?
IAQG is a trademark the International Aerospace Quality Group.
Copyright © 2014 IAQG. All rights reserved.
30