The Changing Landscape for Schools SENCO Conference Colchester Friday 4th July Sponsored by Session 1 – SEND Current Context – The changing landscape for schools Session 2 – The New Ofsted Framework and SEND Session 3 – Managing the learning environment for pupils with SEND Sponsored by Session 1 SEND – the current context for schools Sponsored by Current Statistics • 2.8% of pupils across all schools have a statement o 53% Mainstream o 39.6% Maintained Special School o 4.9% Independent School o 1.8% Non – Maintained Special School o 0.7% Pupil Referral Units • 16.0% of pupils identified as having SEN (School Action and School Action Plus) with no statement DfE First Release – National Statistics January 2013 Complex needs • Co-existing, Overlapping, Co-morbidity, Co-occurring • Neuro-developmental disorders, chromosomal disorders, poverty, environmental, mental health, alcohol, drugs and smoking, premature birth, modern medical science etc • Schools to meet the needs of 21st Century child The journey… • • • • • • • • • • SEND Green Paper – March 2011 Pathfinders established – September Progress and Next Steps – March 2012 Children and Families Bill – February 2013 Indicative Code of Practice – October 2013 March 2014 – Children and Families Act 2014 June 2014 – SEND Code of Practice June 2014 – SEND Regulations September 2014 – Implementation of Act September 2014 – Transitional arrangements Pathfinders Update • • • • 2013/14 - 9 Pathfinder champions to support non-pathfinder areas March 2014 - The SEND pathfinder programme evaluation 2014/15 – 11 Pathfinder champions SEND Pathfinder Information packs – updated April 2014 o http://www.sendpathfinder.co.uk/infopacks/ • £70m SEN Reform Grant to support local authorities implement reforms • £45.2m additional SEND Implementation Grant • £30m for Independent Supporters SEND Code of Practice • • • • • • Published June 2014 271 pages 11 chapters plus Introduction Annex 1 – Mental Capacity Annex 2 – Improving practice and staff training in education settings It is statutory guidance on duties, policies and procedures relating to Part 3 of Children and Families Act • The Special Educational Needs and Disability Regulations 2014 Changes since the 2001 CoP • The Code of Practice (2014) covers the 0-25 age range and includes guidance relating to disabled children and young people as well as those with SEN • There is a clearer focus on the participation of children and young people and parents in decision-making at individual and strategic levels • There is a stronger focus on high aspirations and on improving outcomes for children and young people • It includes guidance on the joint planning and commissioning of services to ensure close co-operation between education, health services and social care • It includes guidance on publishing a Local Offer of support for children and young people with SEN and disabilities Changes since the 2001 CoP • Social, mental and emotional health replaces behaviour, social and emotional as an area of need • There is new guidance for education and training settings on taking a graduated approach to identifying and supporting pupils and students with SEN (to replace School Action and School Action Plus) - Quality first teaching embedded throughout • SEN provision is that which goes beyond the differentiated approaches and learning arrangements normally provided as part of high quality personalised teaching uses appropriate evidence – based interventions Changes since the 2001 CoP • SEN support in schools based on 4 types of action – plan, assess, do, review • For children and young people with more complex needs a coordinated assessment process and the new 0-25 Education, Health and Care Plan (EHC plan) replace statements and Learning Difficulty Assessments (LDAs) • There is greater focus on support that enables those with SEN to succeed in their education and make a successful transition to adulthood Local Offer Local authorities must publish a local offer, setting out in one place information about provision the expect to be available for C&YP in their area who have SEN or are disabled, including those who do not have EHC plans. • Co-produced with parents and young people • Fully involve services in its development and review • Holistic – 0 -25 education, training, transport, social and health care, employment, independent living • Very clear on how to access services • Clarify how decisions are made, by when and what to do if things go wrong • Up to date and written in plain English • Clear about provision schools and colleges will deliver Education, Health and Care Plans • • • • Each local authority may have a different format Outcomes focused – evidenced based Set out how services will work together to meet the C&YP needs Based on co-ordinated assessment and planning process – child or young person at centre of decision making • Describe positively what child or young person can do and has achieved • Indicate how education, health and care provision will be integrated • Forward looking Transfer of statements to plans • • • • • • • • Local authority duty LA transitional arrangements Parents need to be kept informed Dual system up to April 2018 No child or young person should “miss out” Current legislation in place until August 2014 Personal budgets Young people post 16 SEN Support • Single category bringing together school action and school action plus • Needs to be finalised by January census 2015 • What will SEN Support look like in your school? • Quality First Teaching • Differentiation and personalisation • Involve children and young people and their parents • Assess, Plan, Do and Review – graduated approach • Evidenced interventions • Record keeping – register? IEPs? SEND – Whole school issue Every school is required to meet the SEN of the children or young people that they support. Mainstream schools must: o Use their best endeavours to make sure that a child with SEN gets the support they need o Ensure that children and young people with SEN engage in the activities of the school alongside pupils who do not have SEN o Designate a teacher to be responsible for co-ordinating SEN provision o Inform parents when they are making special educational provision for a child o Prepare a report on the implementation of their SEN policy Statutory Duties The word must refers to a statutory duty under primary legislation, regulation or case law. • All Early Years providers, schools and Post 16 establishments must have regard to the Code of Practice • They must fulfil their statutory duties towards children and young people with SEND in the light of the guidance set out in the Code of Practice • They must be able to demonstrate in their arrangements that they are fulfilling their statutory duty to have regard to the Code • They must adhere to the legal obligations set out in the Equality Act 2010 and the School Admissions Statutory Duties - Schools • Every school is required to identify and address the SEN of the pupils they support. • Schools must use their best endeavours to ensure that the necessary provision is made for any individual who has SEN, ensure that all children and young people engage in activities alongside their peers, designate a teacher to be the SENCO, inform parents when they are making special educational provision and prepare an SEN information report • Schools must co-operate with the local authority in reviewing the provision that is available locally and in developing the Local Offer • Schools must make reasonable adjustments including the provision of auxiliary aids and services, for disabled children, to prevent them being put at a substantial disadvantage Statutory Duties - Schools • Parents must be formally notified once decision to provide SEN Support is made • Local authorities must review an EHC plan at least annually and schools must co-operate in the review process (LA can require schools to manage review meetings on their behalf) • School’s must produce an annual report for parents on their child’s progress • Governing Bodies (or equivalent) must produce a SEN Information report Statutory Duties - Schools • The SENCO must be a qualified teacher and they must achieve the NASENCO qualification within three years of appointment • The school’s governing body must ensure that arrangements are in place in schools to support pupils at school with medical conditions and ensure that school leaders consult health and social care professionals, pupils and parents to make sure that the needs of children with medical conditions are effectively supported Associated Documents • Children with Medical Conditions – Statutory guidance published April 2014 • The Equality Act o Guidance – Equality Act 2010 – advice for schools – June 2014 • The Mental Capacity Act 2005 • Department Advice on Mental Health and behaviour in schools – June 2014 Don’t Forget..... • • • • Early Years & KS1 National Curriculum Reform Assessment Examination Reform - 16 and beyond Early Years & KS1 • EYFS Profile no longer compulsory after September 2016 • Training for Early Years Teachers and Early Years Educators • September 2013 - 15 hours of Early Years Provision – disadvantaged 2 year olds – 130,000 September 2014 • New SEN Legislation to include Early Years Provision • Ofsted framework for Early Years Providers in line with school inspection • Free School Meals for KS1 • Phonics Check National Curriculum • Taught in all maintained primary and secondary schools from September 2014 • Subject based from 5 years to 16 years • 10 subjects in KS1 • 11 subjects in KS2 • 12 subjects in KS3 • 6 subjects in KS4 plus at least one subject from each of four identified areas • Pupils entering Y2 and Y6 – September 2014 continue with current NC – End of KS SATs in September 2015 Assessment - Primary • The two –year-old progress check undertaken in early years settings • A short reception baseline that will sit within the assessments that teachers make of children during reception • • from 2016, the reception baseline assessment will be the only measure we will use to assess the progress of children who enter reception year (EYFS Profile not compulsory) The baseline assessment will score each pupil against the knowledge and understanding typical for children at the start of reception year. It will be linked to the learning and development requirements of the early years foundation stage (EYFS) and to the key stage 1 national curriculum in English and mathematics. Assessment - Primary • A phonics check near the end of year 1 • A teacher assessment at the end of KS1 in mathematics, reading and writing , informed by pupils’ scores in externally-set but internally marked tests and teacher assessment of speaking and listening and science • From Summer 2015 half of all infant schools will have KS1 Assessment externally moderated • National tests at the end of KS2 in mathematics, reading, grammar, punctuation and spelling and teacher assessment of mathematics, reading, writing and science • New performance descriptors will be introduced to inform statutory teacher assessments in Autumn 2014 Examination Reform • KS3 teacher assessment only • KS4 - Progress across a suite of 8 subjects (indicate if pupils have performed better than expected at the end of KS4 considering their starting point - end of KS2) • Attainment across 8 subjects (the school’s average grade across the same suite of 8 subjects) • Minimum requirements (floor standards) will be set using the Progress 8 measure • Implemented from the 2015/16 academic year • 1.2% of pupils will not be recognised in the Progress 8 measure due to their individual needs Session 2 Ofsted Framework and SEND Sponsored by Best Practice • • • • Strong teaching and learning Accurate assessment and identification Well-designed curriculum Close tracking and rigorous monitoring of progress with intervention quickly put in place • A thorough evaluation of the impact of additional provision (including alternative provision) • Clear routes to gain specialist support • AMBITION Best Practice High aspirations and a focus on enabling children and young people to be as independent as possible led most reliably to the best achievement. (SEND Review, Ofsted (2010) Best Practice - Achievement • Clear and detailed understanding of ‘next steps’ • Focus on pupils’ starting points – expected and exceeding expected progress • Progress and attainment data are evaluated thoroughly • A wide range of data is evaluated and used effectively to improve standards/progress and improve provision • (RAISE and school data; groups and interventions) • Narrowing of the attainment gaps between the pupils and all pupils nationally • Analysis with reference to national transition matrices • Analysis with reference to progression materials (where pupils are attaining below NC levels) Best Practice - Achievement • Analysis with reference to progression materials (where pupils are attaining below NC levels) • Moderation is rigorous and developmental • Destinations/progression/accreditation • Communication skills/literacy/numeracy • Achievement across a wide range of subjects • Levels of independence • Governing body role: knowledgeable and challenging Best Practice - Teaching • Structured and managed according to the needs of the pupils and the learning objective • A very strong focus on learning rather than on engagement and being busy • Challenging and motivating activities – making effective use of knowledge about pupils’ attainments and interests at which pupils are working and the level of challenge then offered by staff • Development of communication, literacy and mathematics Best Practice - Teaching • Systematic and effective on-going assessment and evaluation that informs teaching and improves learning • Knowledge of the pupils and the implications of their special needs • The management and evaluation of additional support towards improving learning – increasing independence • Effective feedback - development of advocacy, choice, decision making Best Practice – Behaviour and Safety • Thirst for knowledge and a love of learning’ • Equally high attitudes across subjects • Attendance, exclusions, internal sanctions - show thorough evaluation of the impact of strategies in place over time • Skilled and highly consistent behaviour management – excellent improvement in behaviour by those who have identified behavioural needs • Rigorous consideration of all forms of bullying and the impact of interventions, including curriculum improvement • Thorough investigation of seeking parents‘ views and the response to these to show improvements over time • All feel safe – including those at Alternative Provision – and understand how to keep themselves safe Best Practice – Leadership and Management • Pursuit of excellence – uncompromising and highly successful drive towards the highest levels of achievement • Relentless drive to improve teaching - rigorous performance management • Close tracking and rigorous monitoring of progress with intervention quickly put in place • Any differences in subjects are effectively challenged • Any dip in progress when teaching known to be meeting needs and of good quality quickly triggers further effective assessment, including involving parents and carers. • This in turn should lead to carefully matched intervention being put in place quickly. Best Practice – Leadership and Management • Curriculum – promotes the ‘love for learning’; contributes very positively to academic achievement, physical well-being and SMSC development • English, literacy and mathematics • A thorough evaluation of the impact of additional provision, including additional staff, in helping to improve students’ progress - and making adjustments to any provision accordingly • Highly effective engagement with parents – including those who find working with school to be difficult • Safeguarding • Governors are knowledgeable and challenge rigorously Curriculum When reporting on the quality of education, inspectors must evaluate evidence for each of the four key judgements and judge the extent to which the school meets the needs of the range of pupils on the school’s roll. They must take into account the destination of pupils when they leave school and consider how well they have been prepared for their next steps. • Curriculum • Focuses on the necessary priorities for ensuring that all pupils make excellent progress in communication, reading, writing and mathematics • Is broad and balanced (in the context of the school) and meets the needs, aptitudes and interest of pupils • Promotes high levels of achievement and good behaviour • Promotes the spiritual, moral, social and cultural development of all pupils, including through the extent to which schools engage their pupils in extra-curricular activity and volunteering within their local community • Is effectively planned and taught • Provides timely independent information, advice and guidance to assist pupils on their next steps in training, education or employment Ofsted – Assessment of Achievement • When looking pupils’ achievements the following aspects are important: • Preparation for the next stage(s) in education, training and employment, and adult life • Identification of intended outcomes/targets involves the young person and parents/carers • Having high expectations, using national comparator information where this is available • Age and starting point of the young person • Taking into account the young person’s disability/special educational needs • Rigorous moderation Ofsted - Assessment of Achievement • Rigorous monitoring • Being dynamic – i.e. can change as the aspirations/outlook for the young person develops • Information about progress towards their achievement being used by leaders and managers to improve provision (‘remove barriers’) • A review of the usefulness of the outcomes being used postplacement by the school/college to review the effectiveness of the provision • The proportions making expected progress and the proportions exceeding expected progress in English and in mathematics from each starting point, compared with national figures, for all pupils • Use of data below National Curriculum Level 1 • Any analysis of robust progress data presented by the school, including information provided by external organisations How do you know? • • • • • • • • • • Are staff facilitating learning as well as they could? Is the purpose of the activity/session clear to all? Are the expectations challenging? Is the mix of consolidation and new work appropriate? How well are pupils included in their lessons? Is turn-taking used appropriately? Is sufficient time given for responses? Are the pupils being helped to become more independent? Is praise used effectively? Is there appropriate consideration of both attainment and ageappropriateness Monitoring the Quality of Teaching • The SENCO should ensure that there is a very clear message that all teachers are responsible and accountable for all pupils in their class wherever or with whoever the pupils are working • SENCOs will work with teachers to support their use of assessment information to set high yet realistic expectations and targets and develop a review process that enables teachers to regularly consider the progress of individual pupils • SENCOs will need to evaluate how support staff are deployed in school, how they are briefed and how effectively the teacher monitors pupils’ learning and provides further direction and support Monitoring the Quality of Teaching • SENCOs develop individual case studies that track a pupil’s progress through school. The case study would highlight a point of entry with relevant data, the interventions that have been implemented, other adults that may have been engaged to support the pupil, regular feedback and reviews at key milestones and then next steps, this would be an on-going document that would track the pupil through their educational experiences • The SENCO can also use the evidence collected from the observations of lessons (including small group interventions) to add to these case studies on individual pupils, the key focus of these being on the learning of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities plus what impact did the observation and monitoring have on improved teaching and learning. Red Alerts • Teaching is not narrowing the attainment gaps for pupils or groups of pupils who have SEN, are disabled or who are eligible for pupil premium and leads to unsatisfactory levels of progress • Teaching is not promoting pupils’ abilities in communication, reading, writing or applying mathematics • Particular groups of pupils disengage and become disinterested in their learning owing to insufficient teacher challenge and low expectations • Planned learning does not reflect the needs of all learners Monitoring the Achievement of Pupils Schools need to have evidence of: • The evaluation of the value added progress for individual pupils based on their starting point and taking into account their age • Evidence of the impact of pupil premium on progress, achievement and attainment • Very clear evidence to acknowledge the difference between those with a special educational need and/or disability who may have particular barriers to their learning and those pupils who are underachieving Monitoring the Achievement of Pupils • The use of the Progression materials to ensure that the school can evidence that they are challenging pupils’ achievement • Any analysis undertaken in relation to pupil attainment and progress uses age and starting point as the benchmarks for progress or attainment not category of disability • Moderation of teacher assessment both from within the school and also looking beyond the school, working with clusters of schools to ensure a robust process. Red Alerts • Pupils with SEN make unsatisfactory progress in relation to their starting points and identified needs • Only some pupils make satisfactory progress in acquiring a range of skills; communication, reading and writing and mathematics • Only some pupils are becoming active in setting themselves challenging targets for improvement • There is a significant gap between the achievement of pupils with SEN and other pupils in the school • There is a lack of robust analysis of pupil progress data and subsequently improvement strategies are either not evident or ineffective Monitoring the Behaviour and Safety of pupils • the extent to which pupils’ attitudes to learning help or hinder their progress in lessons • pupils’ attitudes to school, conduct and behaviour, during and outside of lessons, their attitudes to other pupils, teachers and other staff, including the prevalence of low-level disruption • the school’s analysis of, and response to, pupils’ behaviour over time, for example incident logs and records of rewards and sanctions • rates, patterns of, and reasons for fixed-period and permanent exclusions , and that they fall within statutory guidance and regulations on exclusions Monitoring the Behaviour and Safety of pupils • pupils’ contribution and response to the culture of the school; how they conduct themselves, including: their respect, courtesy and good manners towards each other and adults; their understanding of how such behaviour contributes to school life, relationships, adult life and work • pupils’ respect for the school’s learning environments (including by not dropping litter) facilities and equipment, and adherence to school uniform policies • types, rates and patterns of bullying and the effectiveness of the school’s actions to prevent and tackle all forms of bullying and harassment. This includes cyber-bullying and prejudice-based bullying related to special educational need, sexual orientation, sex, race, religion and belief, gender reassignment or disability • the school’s success in keeping pupils safe, whether within school or during external activities through, for instance, effective risk assessments, e-safety arrangements, and action taken following any serious safeguarding incident Monitoring the Behaviour and Safety of pupils • the effectiveness of the school’s actions to prevent and tackle discriminatory and derogatory language – this includes homophobic and racist language, and language that is derogatory about disabled people • the extent to which pupils are able to understand, respond to and calculate risk effectively, for example risks associated with extremism • the school’s response to any extremist behaviour shown by pupils • overall and persistent absence and attendance rates for different groups • punctuality over time in arriving at school and at lessons • the impact of the school’s strategies to improve behaviour and attendance • the number of pupils taken off roll in the last year as a result of factors related to behaviour, safety and attendance. Red Alerts • Low level disruption and disorder of teaching and learning experiences significantly contribute to and reduce the effectiveness of learning for all • Poor behaviour in school can be attributed to small groups of pupils’ lack of respect and intolerance for each other and a lack of selfdiscipline • Bullying occurs regularly and the school’s response does not inspire confidence or a sense of safety for pupils generally • Pupil attendance is a significant factor for all pupils or groups of pupils and strategies for improvement are not evident or show little impact Leadership and Management • Inspectors should consider: o How well leaders, managers and governors pursue excellence, modelling professional standards in all their work o The effectiveness of monitoring and evaluation and the extent to which it is shared with governors o The use of performance management and effectiveness of strategies for improving teaching , including the extent to which the school takes into account the “Teachers’ Standards” o How well leaders and managers ensure the curriculum meets the needs of all pupils Leadership and Management • How well leaders and managers demonstrate the capacity to bring about further improvement • The quality of middle leadership in the school • The effectiveness of governance • How effectively the school promotes the confidence and engagement of parents • The effectiveness of safeguarding arrangements to ensure there is safe recruitment and that all pupils are safe. Red Alerts • A significant lack of focus on outcomes, raising standards and doing what works • Insufficient effective leadership and management in good teaching securing good teaching for all groups of pupils • The curriculum and needs of the pupils are not well matched • Leadership and management of the literacy needs of all pupils hamper pupils’ progress • Weak governance shows lack of accountability • Systems are not sufficiently well established to enable the school to identify if its provision is enabling pupils to make progress The key to a school’s success is that they can evidence high quality educational provision which is offered every day for every pupil Session 3 Managing the learning environment for pupils with SEND Sponsored by Activity • What are the barriers to learning for pupils in your school? • What strategies do you have that support these pupils? • What successful interventions have you used? Barriers to learning • • • • • • • • Curriculum approach and content – real learning experiences Teaching styles Inaccessible teaching materials Inappropriate accommodation Inappropriate peer grouping Staff attitudes Staff knowledge, skills and understanding Deployment of support staff Quality First Teaching • What does your school expect every teacher to provide for every pupil everyday? • What does Quality First Teaching look like in your school? • How are teaching staff supported to ensure that they understand what this means? The Three Waves WAVE 1 Inclusive high quality teaching for all WAVE 2 Additional programmes and/or planned support that are designed to accelerate learning WAVE 3 Additional highly personalised interventions • Wave 1 : Quality First Teaching • Wave 2 : Wave 1 plus additional, time-limited, tailored intervention support programmes • Wave 3: Wave 1 plus increasingly individualised programmes Wave 2 Interventions • Small group – specified period of time • Designed for pupils with the potential to ‘catch up’ and reach agerelated norms by the end of the programme delivery • Relatively fast pace of learning • Delivered by a trained member of staff • Class teacher has a full understanding of the intervention and how to integrate learning into the classroom • Not a stepping stone to Wave 3 Wave 3 Interventions • For a small percentage of children and young people • Even with high-quality Wave 1 teaching and support, do not make progress and have significant needs • Structured and intensive programme that is tailored to individual’s specific difficulties • One to one programme by a teacher/teaching assistant who has undertaken some additional training • Narrow the gap between an individual and their peers • Class teacher has a full understanding of the intervention and how to integrate learning into the classroom What works? • The Sutton-Trust - Education Endowment Fund – Teaching and Learning Toolkit • Ofsted Report - How schools are spending the funding successfully to maximise achievement • Ofsted analysis and challenge tools for schools • Oxford School Improvement - The Pupil Premium – Making it work in your school • What works for Struggling Readers? (2009)The University of York • What works for children and young people with literacy difficulties? The effectiveness of intervention schemes (2013) Gregg Brookes – The Dyslexia-SpLD Trust • “What works” website from The Communication Trust • The SEND Gateway from nasen website Differentiation or Personalisation • Content: Adaptation of what they want the students to learn or how the students can gain access to knowledge, skills and understanding; • Process: How the student comes to understand and assimilate facts, concepts and skills. Grouping of students based on their learning styles and a recognition that students with SEN are at different levels and learn in different ways; • Product: The way in which students are afforded different ways of demonstrating what they have learned; • Classroom: The establishment of environments that are conducive to learning, teaching and assessment; • Teacher: Focus on the vital role that teacher’s play in facilitating learning and/or creating barriers to learning, teaching and assessment. Consider…. • • • • • • • • • Planning Marking Feedback Assessment Moderation Observation Monitoring and Evaluation Record keeping Reporting Funding for SEN Support • All mainstream schools are provided with resources that they can use to support those with additional needs, including children and young people with SEN and disabilities. • Schools have an amount identified within their overall budget, called the notional SEN budget. This is not a ring-fenced amount, and it is for the school to provide, high quality appropriate support from the whole of its budget. • Schools, as part of their normal budget planning should determine their approach to using their resources to support the progress of pupils with SEN. • Schools are not expected to meet the costs of the more expensive support from their core funding. They are expected to provide additional support which costs up to a nationally prescribed threshold per pupil/student per year. School Funding • Element 1 – Per pupil amount – a percentage of this should be spent on supporting SEN • Element 2 – Notional SEN budget – support interventions and support for those identified with SEN – Expected school will spend £6000 • Element 3 – Top-Up Funding Pupil Premium • Raise the attainment of disadvantaged children and young people • £2.5b over five years • Eligible for free school meals in last 6 years plus children in care of local authority for more than six months • April 2014 - £1,300 (Primary) £935 (Secondary) • £1900 for LAC children (included adopted and fostered) • Children of Parents in Armed forces - £300 • £100m spent on Summer Schools 2012 & 2013 • Further funding available for summer schools 2014 • Yr. 7 Literacy and Numeracy Catch-Up funding - £500 • Pupil Premium for 3 & 4 year olds Financial Management • • • • • • • Notional SEN Budget Pupil Premium “Top-up” funding Full cost provision management Human resources Classroom resources Interventions Effective use of SEN Funding • • • • • • • Quality First Teaching Whole school provision map of interventions High Quality Professional Development Equality Duty LA support and guidance Commissioning external support Thinking outside the box! Planning for Inclusive Teaching • • • • • • • • • • Appropriate teaching styles and approaches Active and interactive teaching strategies Classroom organisation Effective use of ICT Structure and consistency Help in learning to work independently Using clear instructions and guidelines Visual prompts Focus on the positive Reinforce the things you want to see Next Steps • • • • • • • • • • • • Read the relevant chapters in the Code of Practice Provide update information for staff Develop your SEN Information Report Clarify what Quality First Teaching means to your school Decide what SEN Support will mean in your school Review and revise SEND Policy Review of SEN register and IEPs Professional Development Audit and programme of CPD Review of school funding for SEN How effectively is your Pupil Premium being used? Are the governing body aware of the new SEN legislation? Are your parents aware of the new SEN legislation? Lorraine Petersen lorrainepetersen@btinternet.com lorrainep1957 www.lpec.org.uk Sponsored by