Mechanical Filtration Hugh S. Hammer, PhD GSCC Ron Malone, PhD LSU Joe Fox, PhD Texas A&M Total Solids The amount of solid material left in a container after the water has evaporated. Total Solids = Total Suspended Solids (TSS) + Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) Total Suspended Solids (TSS) are solids that can be trapped by a filter. Examples: silt, decaying organic material, industrial wastes, sewage Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) are solids that pass through a filter (0.45 microns). Examples: carbonates, bicarbonate, chloride, sulfate, phosphate, nitrate, calcium, magnesium, sodium and other ions. TOTAL SOLIDS ARE INDICATORS OF POLLUTION Sources of Total Suspended Solids High flow rates from fast moving water, silt, sand, clay, organics Soil erosion (non-point source) Urban runoff (non-point source) Waste water and septic effluent Decaying organic matter Fish that stir up sediments (carps) Problems with TSS Increased biotic and abiotic turbidity – Reduced light transmittance and photosynthesis – Unstable dissolved oxygen – Increase water temperature – Abiotic sources can clog gills and increase disease – Smother eggs, filter feeding animals, and aquatic insects – High TSS is often an indicator of other types of pollutants and toxins (mercury and PCB) Testing TSS A water sample is filtered through a preweighed filter (0.45 microns) The residue retained in the filter is dried in an oven at 103 to 105 C The sample is dried to constant weight and the weight is recorded Reported as grams per liter (ppt) Total Dissolved Solids The water sample is passed through a 0.45 micron filter The water that passes through the filter is dried in a pre-weighed dish at 180 C The sample is dried to constant weight TDS is reported as milligrams per liter (ppm) This is directly related to the conductance of water (dissolved ions) EPA standard of 500 ppm for drinking water Sources of TDS Geology and sediment composition Fertilizer run-off Waste-water and septic effluent Soil erosion Urban run-off *** The TDS frequently includes phosphorous, nitrate, and other nutrients Aquaculture Solids FEED FECES Uneaten Feed Mechanical Filtration Solids removal employs systems from the wastewater treatment industry Screening, gravity separation (sedimentation, centrifuging, hydrocycloning) or adsorption between particulate beds Processes designations for RAS – Primary: one or more gravity methods – Secondary: biological filtration – Tertiary: ion exchange, reverse osmosis, foam fractionation, carbon adsorption, sometimes disinfection Solids Characterization Three means of classification: Solid materials are further classified as being either settleable, suspended, dissolved or colloidal Difference between settleable and suspended solids is a matter of practicality Most settleable: > 10 µM (settle in an Imhoff cone in less than 1 hr) Particles passing through a 1.2 µM membrane filter are dissolved, suspended are trapped Dissolved particles consist of some organic and inorganic ions and molecules present in solution Particle Size Distribution (microns) Settleable 10-4 100 Dissolved 10-3 10-2 Colloidal 10-1 1 10 Suspended SOLIDS REMOVAL PROCESSES AND PARTICLE SIZES Coarse Screens Cartridge Filter Plain Sedimentation Tube Settler Microscreen Granular Filter Foam Fractionation 100 30 75 Particle Size, microns 10 Impact of Solids on Recirculating Systems Increased BOD: causes oxygen availability problems with animals and biofilters Organic wastes (feces) build up increasing ammonia and nitrite levels (toxic) Increased system turbidity, decreased water clarity (fine particles) Gill damage in fish (fine particles) can create opportunities for diseases Waste Solids Become Chemical Problems Both uneaten feed and fecal material become toxic ammonia through the action of decomposing bacteria. Uneaten Feed Feces Heterotrophic Bacteria Ammonia NH3/NH4 Increased Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) Oxygen Oxygen Oxygen Oxygen Oxygen Oxygen Tilapia No Fine Solids Capture Tiger Barbs Settleable Solids Removal If screens aren’t used, wastewater is first treated by simple sedimentation (primary treatment) Separation is via gravity settling As with ponds, the principle design criteria are the basin’s cross-sectional area, detention time, depth and overflow rate (refer to previous notes) Ideal sedimentation basins don’t exist in the real world due to a variety of particle sizes, composition, etc. Once settling velocity is known, basic dimensions can be estimated Sedimentation Advantages: – Inexpensive – Works by gravity and doesn’t require energy Disadvantages: – Only gets largest solids – Takes a lot of space – Labor intensive to clean SEDIMENTATION Vs OUTFLOW Settling Zone (Vs > Overflow Rate to settle) Sludge Zone Outlet Zone INFLO W Inlet Zone Vh Sedimentation Tanks and Basins Sedimentation Tank Plate and Tube Separators Also work on principle of gravity Actually enhance settling capacity of basins Typically shallow settling devices consisting of modules of flat parallel plates or inclined tubes of various geometric design Used in primary thru tertiary treatment Limited success Centrifuges and cyclonic separators Increase gravitational force on particles via spinning motion (i.e., settling rate increases) Many devices rated at different g forces Work best on freshwater systems due to many particles having similar densities to that of seawater Most practical are hydrocyclones or cyclonic separators Heavy particles are moved by higher outside velocity to outside and downward Underflow exiting unit is very small and high density, “cleaner” water exits top Under-gravel Filters Advantages: – Easy to build and operate – Inexpensive – Does both mechanical and biological filtration Disadvantages: – Needs to be vacuumed regularly (lots of maintenance) – Clog easily – Can’t handle big loads (mainly for aquariums and not practical for aquaculture production) Airlifts Perform Several Functions Air Air – – – – Circulation Aeration C02 stripping Foam control Circulation Circulation Options Air Airlift Pump Air Screens Simplest, oldest method, pre-treatment prior to primary treatment Placed across flow path of RAS water Coarse screens handle raw effluent, biofloc; fine screens for tertiary treatment Many materials: fibers to A/C filters; cost increases with decreased mesh size Static vs. rotary screens (0.25 to 1.5 mm; about 4-16 gpm flow per square inch of screen; removal efficiency around 5-25% Rotary screens for fine solids removal are 50-70% efficient; 15-60 µM Screens Disadvantages: – – – – – May be difficult to remove and clean Labor intensive to clean Auto wash micro-screen filters use a lot of water Some Units very expensive ($10,000) Get mainly large solids and clog quickly Advantages: – Simple concept – Can be inexpensive and simple to build (socks, pantihose, furnace filters, mesh bags) Micro-screen Filters Over-Drain Flow Captured Solids Microscreen Cleaning Jets Granular Media Filters Commonly referred to as “sand” or “bead” filters Two types “slow” and “rapid” filters Advantages: – – – – – – Less labor is required (typically only to backwash) Gets a wide variety of solid sizes (down to 20 microns) Require less water than some units Mechanical and Biological filters (depending on the media) Best all-around mechanical filters Capable of handling large loads (production aquaculture) Disadvantages: – – – – Requires a lot of pressure for some (pumps) Expensive Can be more complex to operate Can clog quickly depending on the media Slow Sand Filters Usually custom-built, open to atm Loading rates are slow, 0.6-0.7 lps/m2 Particle size: 30 µM max For this reason require more floor space Used in gravity flow situations Downside: cleaning O pen T op O PEN C LO SED P e r of ra et d G ra ve l S uppo r tP al et F LI TR A T OI N M O D E BAC KW ASH NI G M O D E Rapid Sand Filters Typically closed, pressurized units Handle high flow rates: 20 gpm/ft2 Downside: very high head loss (30-90 ft) Only really good for low solids process streams with some sort of pre-trt Backwashing can be made automatic Granular Filters Important Point Sand filters can be used in series to filter out different size particles so that they don’t clog quickly. – Large gravel Small gravel sand filter – This is frequently used for facilities that bring in natural water (such as seawater) BEAD FILTERS (a) Propeller-washed (b) Bubble-washed Propeller-washed Floating Bead Filters F iltra toi n B ackw ash ni g Broodstock Return Bypass Anti-siphon valve Sludge View Port Pressure Gauge Sludge Intake ADM System Prop-Washed Bead Filters Motor and Backwash Propeller 4/13/2015 Pump Filter Mode Drop Filters : Low Water Loss Floating Bead Bioclarifiers (2 ) W a te r F low A B (1 ) W a te r F low (7 ) (5 ) (6 ) C E (4 ) A ir F low A ir W a ter Settled Backwash Waters returned to system D Air Bleed Builds Charge W a ter S lu d g e P a ten t # 5 7, 7 0 0, 8 0 (3 ) Backwash mode (2 ) Drop Filters : Low Water Loss Floating Bead Bioclarifiers Released Air Washes Beads (1 ) W a te r F low (7 ) (5 ) (6 ) C E (4 ) A ir F low A ir W a ter Internal Sludge Capture P a ten t # 5 7, 7 0 0, 8 0 (3 ) Circulation Aeration Degassing Solids Capture Biofiltration Inlet Airlift Cartridge Filters Consist of cannister and replaceable cartridge Advantages: – Removes very small particles – Max particle retention is 0.01 µM (0.00001 mm) – Very high water clarity – Great for aquariums Disadvantages: – Can be expensive – Can clog quickly – Can’t handle large volumes – Not practical for production aquaculture Sock and Canister Filters Diatomaceous Earth (DE) Filters Granular material composed of diatom skeletons (frustules) Can serve as replacement for cartridge filters, but require pre-filtration Fine grade DE can filter down to 0.1 µM Factors to Consider Particle size to be removed Amount of energy required to operate Labor and maintenance Amount of bio-load the filter can handle (pounds of fish and pounds of feed) Separate Units Strategy Partitions water treatment into a series of individually steps Optimizes each step to meet the narrow objective Integrates steps to develop a “treatment train” Consolidation Strategy Utilize multi-functioning components to: Minimize the number of components Improve the stability Reduce costs of components and energy Smaller footprint (less space) Disadvantage is that neither process is optimized If you have space and money the separate units strategy is better