CBP Socio-Economic Component Drivers-Impacts-Responses Analysis Carbon Benefits Project System Project Information Module Measurement Toolkit advisor Project Description Module Protocol Module Guidance Module Measurement Module Remote Sensing Ground-based Assessment Tools Simple Detailed Dynamic Assessment Assessment Modelling MRV Module REDD & A/R Carbon Benefits Socioeconomic Tools Reporting Module Why use DPSIR? To answer important questions: • Why do landusers not adopt the sustainable land management (SLM) practices offered by the project? • Why do many land-users continue with practices that have negative carbon impacts? • How can we improve adoption rates of SLM practices - Beyond the project area? - After the project is finished? • Why do some socio-economic groups seem less likely to adopt SLM than others? - e.g. wealth, gender, farm-size related. Uses of DPSIR • Organises and links qualitative information effectively for analysis • Analyses the different layers of Drivers of change and their Impacts • Equips us to think about Responses to tackle root causes • Complements the CBA tool • Well used tool in credible projects (LADA,GEO) Applying the DPSIR Framework to CBP State • • • • State of Natural Resources Entry point for the DPSIR Total System Carbon Magnitude and Direction of change Biophysical Model Output: __ tonnes of CO2e per year Pressures • Direct Drivers that cause the change in carbon state • Land Management Practices Driving Forces • Indirect Drivers, underlying reasons or explanations • Leading to adoption or non-adoption of practices • Chain of explanation or causality A Chain of Explanation Example: Land degradation in Uganda Two neighbouring banana farmers in Uganda, Farmer A was conserving her soil with trash lines and ditches, Farmer B was not. Why? A Chain of Explanation Why is Soil Organic Matter Decreasing? Pressure: Lack of erosion control measures Farmer B appeared not to be trying to conserve his land – But …. He had tried several times but the force of water coming from upslope was too great – ditches were washed away – Why? …. Because upslope fields in supposedly protected forest areas had been recently opened up – Why? ….. Because some farmers were able to open fields without problem in these areas – How? …. Because they were influential within the village and few could oppose them government forest protection lawsenforced were ineffective Drivingand Force: Corruption, policies policies/local and laws not Because they were influential within the village and few could oppose them and government forest protection policies/local laws were ineffective Driving Forces • Some may be environmental (pest, drought, rainfall variability) • Many will be economic, social and institutional in nature Impacts • Consequences due to the condition and change in carbon state • Impacts on user livelihoods, natural systems • Impacts on different groups of people • Positive /Negative • Short term / Long term • Landusers are concerned about impacts more than carbon Responses • Reduce negative impacts / promote positive impacts • To improve uptake of carbon friendly practices • Remove obstacles to adoption • Targeted at all levels of drivers • Provides guidance to policy makers, officials etc. Example of DPSIR Diagram Output Responses Driving Forces D1. Explore options for improving security of tenure with community D2. Provide education/information on alternative management P1. Provide access to alternatives to intensive grazing D1. Land tenure D2. Traditional practice Pressures Impacts P1. () Grazing Induced Degradation D1, D2 P2. () Full Tillage D2 Short Term: I1. (+) Livestock production (P1) I2. (++) Social Status (P1) State Long Term: I3. (- -) Food security (P1) I4. (- -) Soil Erosion (P2) Example of DPSIR Diagram Output Driving Forces Responses D2. Provide accessible education D3. Provide low interest credit services P1. Provide access to alternative livelihoods D1. Land tenure D2. Traditional practice D3. Poverty Pressures Impacts P1. () Grazing Induced Degradation D1, D2 P2. () Full Tillage D2, D3 Short Term: I1. Livestock production (P1) I2. Social Status (P1) State Long Term: I3. Food security (P1) I4. Soil Erosion (P2) BREAK OUT GROUPS 1 (20mins) • Use your own example to draw a DPSIR diagram • If possible use one / some of the land use systems you entered in the biophysical tool • Present your diagram after the next exercise, not now • Break into 4 Groups DPSIR Web Tool Worked Example Yala, Kenya • Positive GHG flux (emissions) • Pressure 1: Overgrazed Grassland • Pressure 2: Continuos Maize Practice with Full Tillage • Select from drop down menus of predetermined lists (DF,P,I) except for Responses • Demonstrate how to Notate DPSIR Diagram with Symbols (+, -, ) and Labels • To show Degree of Significance and importance Degree of Significance of Driving Force +++ : The Driving Force is a predominant and crucial factor in increasing the adoption of the specific land management practice (Pressure) ++ : The Driving Force is an important factor in increasing the adoption of the specific land management practice (Pressure) +: The Driving Force is a factor in increasing the adoption of the specific land management practice (Pressure) +/- : The Driving Force has mixed effects on the adoption of the land management practice, increasing and decreasing adoption with no clear net effect on adoption. - - - : The Driving Force is a predominant and critical constraint to the adoption of the specific land management practice (Pressure) - - : The Driving Force is an important constraint to the adoption of the specific land management practice (Pressure) -: The Driving Force is a constraint to the adoption of the specific land management practice (Pressure) Level ShortofTerm Impact Impact: +++: An impact Highly resulting positive impact from the onland humans management or naturalpractice systems(Pressure) felt within ++ two: years Moderately of implementation. positive impact on humans or natural systems + : Low positive impact on humans or natural systems +/Long : Mixture Term Impact: of positive and negative impacts on humans or natural systems -An impact : Low negative resultingimpact from the on humans land management or natural systems practice that starts to be felt -two - : Moderately years or more negative after implementation. impact on humans or natural systems - - - : Highly negative impact on humans or natural systems Example of DPSIR Diagram Output Driving Forces Responses D2. Provide accessible education D3. Provide low interest credit services P1. Provide access to alternative livelihoods D1. (+ +) Land tenure D2. (+ +/+) Traditional practice D3. (+) Poverty Impacts Pressures Short Term: I1. (+) Livestock production (P1) I2. (+ +) Social Status (P1) P1. () Grazing Induced Degradation D1, D2 P2. () Full Tillage D2, D3 State Long Term: I3. (- -) Food security (P1) I4. (- -) Soil Erosion (P2) Example of DPSIR Table Output Driving Forces Pressures State D2. Traditional Practice (+) Practice passed down through many generations D3. Poverty (+) Can’t afford herbicides needed with conservation tillage P2. Full Tillage () Conservation tillage practice not adopted by locals Terrestrial Carbon D2. Traditional Practice (+ +) Culturally, fencing is a curse to common property access and use I1. Livestock Production (+) Short Term Atmospheric Carbon D1. Land tenure (+ +) P1. Grazing Induced No land tenure. Management Degradation () decisions made with a short Fenced off areas are term perspective still being grazed. Impacts I2. Social status (+ +) Short Term Number of livestock owned is proportional to wealth Responses R:D2. Provide accessible education R:P1. Provide access to alternative livelihoods I3. Food security (- -) Long Term I4. Soil Erosion (- -) R:D3. Provide low Short/Long Term interest credit Greatly increases rate of soil services displacement during heavy rains BREAK OUT GROUPS 2 (30mins) • Use web tool • Give your DPSIR Diagram symbols (+, -, ) and labels (D1, P1, I1) • If not enough time, label all but just focus on giving symbols to one DPSIR Component • Present Notated DPSIR Diagram