Appointment of service provider to conduct annual audits of financial models – Briefing session 4 November 2013 Unyielding commitment to REJUVENATION REVIVAL RENAISSANCE TRANSFORMATION 1. Opening and welcome G MNISI 2. Background & scope of services N Gosani 3. Tendering process G MNISI 3.1 Disqualification criteria 3.2 Submission requirements 3.3 Technical Evaluation Criteria 3.4 Financial and Preference Evaluation Criteria 4. Submission of tender G MNISI 5. Communication G MNISI 6. Question & Answers G MNISI 7. Closure G MNISI To give the potential tenderers an opportunity to seek clarity on any issue that may have presented challenges in responding to the RFT To give a summary of TCTA’s projects with the view to assist tenderers complete their bids in an informed manner To invite those services providers with appropriate skill, experience and software to submit bids for the purpose of providing financial models audit services to TCTA 3 4 TCTA is a Special Purpose Vehicle Responds to directives/mandates from the Minister of Water and Environmental Affairs to fund and implement bulk raw water infrastructure on behalf of DWA Board is appointed by Minister of Water and Environmental Affairs Established under the Water Act Schedule 2 Public Entity w.r.t. PFMA Limited recourse approach No balance sheet Break-even of revenue to costs over a specified period Fully debt funded – no equity Ring-fenced projects – tariffs related to a specific project – no cross-application of revenue Non profit-taking organisation Recover actual costs – overhead and capex, no profit/loss or reserves Risk averse approach – risk is transferred to parties best suited to manage it Revenue stream terminates once debt is repaid on a project Tariffs are TCTA’s main source of revenue 5 National Raw Water Resource Infrastructure DWA TCTA Water Boards Distribution of water Municipality End User Treat raw water to potable level 6 • Fund and implement infrastructure Implementation agreement Water Delivery TCTA • Collection of Income • Undertake to honour obligations of TCTA Users 7 • Payment for water including CUC due to TCTA Payment of Tariffs • Supply bulk raw water to users • Operate & maintain infrastructure Water supply agreement DWA Projects in operations LHWP-I 8 KWSAP BWP VRESAP Revenue Recourse • Explicit Government Guaranteed • Income stream from KWSAP • Implied guarantee Mandate Activities • Fund • Risk management • Operation & Maintenance of assets • Implement • Fund • Risk management •Implement • Fund • Risk management •Implement • Fund • Risk management Peak of debt R 20 billion + R 1.9 billion R 1.4 billion R 3.3 billion Construction Period: Commenced Completed 1986 - 2001 Jan 2011 Apr 2014 2003 - 2008 2005 - 2012 Repayment of debt 2025 2028 2028 20 years after construction •Income stream from BWP • Implied government guarantee •Income stream from VRESAP •Implied government guarantee Projects under construction MMTS-2 9 AMD ORWRDP-2 MCWAP Revenue Recourse • Income stream of MMTS2 • Implied guarantee • Short term solution funded from the fiscus • Funded from the fiscus • Income stream of MCWAP • Implied guarantee Mandate Activities • Implement • Fund • Risk management • Implement • Model audit not on scope for now • Implement • Model audit not the scope for now • Implement • Fund • Risk management Peak of debt + R 1.6 billion N/A – fiscal funding, no debt N/A – fiscal funding, no debt Ph 1 – R 2.5 billion Ph 2 – R 15 billion Construction Period: Commenced Completed Feb 2011 (Apr 2014) Jan 2015 Dam: Completed BDS: (To be advised) Ph 1 – 2012/ Ph 2 2014 Ph 1 – 2014/ Ph 2 - 2020 Repayment of debt 20 years after construction N/A 20 years after construction 10 TCTA Tariffs will generate sufficient revenue streams to meet contractual obligations and sustain TCTA Correct tariff set so as not to misinform stakeholders Banks and bondholders Repayment of loan obligations within contract terms SARB Support inflation targeting National Treasury Protection of sovereign against unnecessary risk - Bankable project Relieve government from financing commercial infrastructure from the fiscus Ensure affordability of tariffs to users Responsible utilisation of state guarantees DWA Inflationary increases in raw water as start of water chain input cost Affordability and predictability to end-users Uncomplicated annual tariff consultations – inflationary increases Water demand management incentive (pay on actual use) No cross subsidisation between projects – transparency of costs Compliance with Water Pricing Strategy 11 SALGA Inflationary increases Fair tariff structures Municipalities Limited to inflationary increases, including raw water components DWA expects TCTA to support this objective Municipality and Council pressure to keep increases low Water sector and end users Tariff stability and predictability Affordable water Inflationary increases acceptable No cross subsidisation between projects – transparency of costs Fitch Ratings Credit rating of all TCTA projects except LHWP 12 Tariff categories for off-budget schemes: Capital Unit Charges (to repay debt) Bulk Operating and Royalties Charge (to repay royalties and bulk O&M) Water Use Charges (statutory charges as per pricing strategy) Operations and Maintenance Charges (State schemes portion) Betterment and Refurbishment Charges (if applicable) Input data supplied to TCTA as follows: BER: long-term economic forecasts (inflation, real interest rates) DWA: 13 13 water demand forecasts (high and low scenarios) system yields future schemes timing and projected costs TCTA recovers the following tariffs: Raw water tariff as capital unit charge to repay debt Bulk Operating and Royalties charge to cover royalties and bulk O&M Full cost recovery from water sold to end-users or take-or-pay where required Based on water sold out of system and not on water delivered into the system from the specific project supports water demand management initiatives reduces demand risk Constant tariff in real terms which increases with: CPI annually Triggers as per the Income Agreement Repayment of debt within reasonable period (eg 20 years) Affordable structure to the end-user Tariff setting takes account of tariff, funding and risk management principles in combined approach 14 National Water Pricing Strategy Administered prices – inflation targeting Stakeholder consultation outcomes Affordability to end-users phasing-in of large adjustments allowance for capitalisation of interest in early years 15 End user affordability Considerations to support end user affordability: Considerations to support debt management: • Under recovering in early years •+20 year repayment period • End-user pays on actual use if bankable • Peak of debt in relation to value of asset (limit interest capitalisation) • Constant tariff in real terms approach – CPI targeting • Risk transfer to end-user – trigger adjustments if input assumptions change • Phasing-in of large tariff adjustments over 2-3 years • Take account of future augmentation – future affordability • No reserves built into tariffs 16 Debt outstanding • Actual cost transfer – TCTA not profit taking • Water sector debt profile – debt overlap with future schemes • Interest rates mostly fixed • Utilisation of explicit Government guarantees and impact on National Treasury Planning process • Input data Demand, system yield, economic fundamentals, cost and timing of future augmentation schemes • Long-term projections DWA compiles longterm demand projections based on coordinated approach with DWA – various departments involved, Water Boards’ Planning and Budgeting departments, Large industrial users, Muni’s etc. 17 Sensitivity Analysis & Stress Testing • Sensitivity Analysis Inflation, real interest rate, timing of future augmentation schemes and repayment periods • Stress Testing Lower inflation, changes in yield of system, higher real interest rate, zero growth in demand etc Consultation • Stakeholder validation Demand projections, system yield, economic fundamentals, cost and timing of future augmentation schemes • Consultation with National Treasury and SARB On administered prices • Consultation with DWA management structure Participation • Rand Water Services Forum • Other Major stakeholder forums 18 The annual audits will include, inter alia, Correct capture of assumptions, i.e.: General input assumptions; demand projections, CPI, real interest rates, admin costs, funding requirements and LT cost plans; Funding input; calcs relating to loans, bonds, interest, fees, capital requirements, capi, CPI uplift on CPI-linked instruments; Loans on models correspond with loan agreements Confirm the accuracy of the following outputs: Net debt curve Tariff Gross borrowings Graphs, etc. 19 Assess the accuracy of the financial models: Initial audits only – review the logic and accuracy of computations; For subsequent audits – map out changes in logic and construction of the model from the previous audited version, and review where changes have been detected; Deliver an initial report of findings and recommendations relating to the accuracy, integrity, highlighting issue for TCTA’s attention; Review changes made by TCTA following initial report; Deliver final opinion letter (report) by the 15th of September, annually; First year only, report to be delivered by 31 March 2014. 20 LHWPI&II BWP VRESAP KWSAP MMTS-2 MCWAPI&II No. of off-takers Numerous 1 2 1 1 2 Project phase Phase I: operational Phase II: structuring Operational Operational Operational Dam: fully constructed, conveyance system: planning phase Phase I: construction Phase II: project structuring No. of phases 2 1 1 1 1 2 No. of loans, subloans & fin. instruments Various Bonds LT loans CPP 3x LT loans CPP 5x LT loans RCF CPP 4x LT loans RCF CPP 3x LT loans RCF CPP 3x LT loans CPP Estimated unique formulae 2000 400 1100 1200 600 1100 Debt curves 3 1 3 1 1 1 CPI-uplift CPI-linked bond None CPI uplift on 1 of the subloans None None None 22 Excel based – standardised template Model information Input (update funding, macro-economic data, demand projections, etc.) Cash flow (calculations) Loan calculations Chart input Charts Tariffs - goal seek function to arrive at a tariff Provision for phasing in during construction to minimise capitalisation of interest Provision for different off-takers and funders Failure to meet the minimum technical score of 65 out of a possible 100 points. No proof of access to auditing tool If currently TCTA’s external auditor Tenderers must submit the full list of documents and information required by TCTA for the purpose of evaluation of the tender offer. The documentation and information required must be numbered in accordance with the numbering set out in this RFT. Two envelope system: Technical evaluation Preference and price 90/10 preference point system will be used Technical evaluation: Company track record, in the last 5 years on financial model auditing and access to financial model audit software tools. The information shall contain: Name of company for whom the work was done Period of Contract Description of the financial model audited Audit tool used Contactable reference Proof of access to a financial model auditing software tool (either current software license in company name or signed letter from licence holder granting access) Company track record on financial model auditing and access to financial model audit software tools 27 CVs Project Leader Financial Model Auditor Financial Model Auditor (HDI) Financial proposal: Tenderers are required to provide a total fixed price over the contract period, broken down per project and per year, for undertaking the scope of services as per the template contained in Appendix D of the RFT Allocation of points: Preference points will be allocated in terms of the preferential procurement evaluation criteria in section 7.2 of the RFT. 28 TCTA will evaluate each Technical submission in terms of the method of evaluation stated in the RFT. The purpose of the technical evaluation is to determinate which tenders qualify for the next phase (financial and preference evaluation). The technical component will be out of 100 points. In order to qualify for the next phase a minimum score of 65 out of a possible 100 points needs to be achieved. List of Returnable schedule Annexure A: Covenant of Integrity Affidavit Annexure B: Bribery and Corruption Declaration Annexure C: Enterprise Information Affidavit Annexure D: Enterprise information Annexure E: Sample refence letter on past projects audited Section 3 Appendix B: • Track Record:Name of company for whom the work was done Period of Contract Description of the financial model audited Audit tool used Contactable reference o Proof of access to a financial model auditing software tool (either current software license in company name or signed letter from licence holder granting access) Standard Bidding Documents:• SBD 4 Closing date and time for submissions: 29 November 2013 at 14h00 Delivery Address: TCTA offices, Ground Floor Stinkhout Wing, Tuinhof Building, 265 West Street, Centurion Delivery method : Proposals must be hand delivered at TCTA’s Centurion offices and addressed to the Receiving Officer, and marked RFT: TCTA/PFT/FMA/2013/25 on or before the closing date and time. ENVELOPE A-Technical Information Copies to be submitted: 1 Original (clearly marked “original” and 5 copies ENVELOPE B-Financial Information Copies to be submitted: 1 signed hardcopy and 1 CDROM Only written communication addressed to Receiving Officer at tenders@tcta.co.za will be considered. TCTA will assume that every individual communicating with it on behalf of a tenderer or a potential tenderer is duly authorized unless otherwise indicated. Please use tender number on all correspondence. Written questions emailed responded to within 48 hours. to tenders@tcta.co.za will be Any addendum to the RFT necessary will be published in the TCTA website until 3 days before the tender closing date Contacts: Ntsikelelo Gosani Project Finance Manager ngosani@tcta.co.za Godfrey Mnisi Project Procurement Specialist gmnisi@tcta.co.za Telephone: (012) 683 1200 33