Introduction to the Study of Child & Adolescent Psychopathology Jess P. Shatkin, MD, MPH Vice Chair for Education NYU Child Study Center, Department of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry New York University School of Medicine “When I was a boy of 14, my father was so ignorant I could hardly stand to have the old man around. But when I got to be 21, I was astonished at how much he had learned in seven years.” --Mark Twain (1835 – 1910) Learning Objectives Residents will be able to: 1. Describe the relative neglect that child and adolescent mental health has historically suffered as a field. 2. Identify various theories of normal child development, risk factors for child mental illness, and sex and socio-cultural differences responsible for mental wellness and illness. 3. Explain the health paradox of adolescence. Why study child & adolescent psychopathology? High prevalence of mental health problems among adolescents and young adults; estimated at 20% by Surgeon General’s Report of 1999. Is this due to better diagnosis, an actual increase in prevalence, or both? Half of all lifetime cases of mental illness are now recognized to begin by age 14 and three-quarters by age 24 (Kessler et al, 2005). The median number of years from the time a child first experiences psychiatric disturbance and receives treatment is 9 years (2 years for psychotic illnesses); Kessler et al, 2005 Despite effective treatments, however, there are typically long delays, sometimes decades, between when individuals first experience clinically significant symptoms and when they first seek and receive treatment. What kind of numbers are we talking? Severe, disabling depression affects approximately 17% of adolescents and young adults nationally (Kashani & Sherman, 1988; Fleming & Offord, 1990; Lewinsohn et al, 1993 & 1994; Kessler & Walters, 1998) Anxiety in its many forms results in significant impairment in approximately 13% of children and adolescents (Shaffer et al, 1996). Attention Deficit-Hyperactivity Disorder (with a prevalence of 3 – 7%) and Bipolar Mood Disorder (with a prevalence of over 1%), and others affect smaller numbers but are ubiquitous What kind of numbers are we talking? (2) Despite the fact that federal government spending on anti-drug measures has increased over ten-fold in the last 15 years, over 50% of high school seniors have experimented with an illicit drug, 23% have used an illicit drug within the past 30 days, and over 30% have been drunk within the past 30 days (Johnston et al, 2005). Suicide, the most feared and tragic outcome of mental illness, is the third most common cause of death among adolescents and young adults, preceded only by accidents and homicide (Anderson and Smith, 2003). Who gets help? The population of children and adolescents under age 20 is projected to grow by about 33 percent in the next 40 years from about 84 million to 112 million by 2050 (U.S. Bureau of the Census, 2010). Fifteen million children in the U.S. have diagnosable psychiatric or learning disorders but nearly 70% don't receive the help they need Who receives services? – 1 in 3 Caucasian kids – 1 in 5 African American kids – 1 in 7 Latino kids Fewer than 10% of the 80,000 public schools in the U.S. have comprehensive mental health services What do we know about these problems? Epidemiology is important but etiology is vital Basic research and clinical investigation are needed to understand the neurobiological basis of mental illness The tragedy is that we most often do not know the “best” treatment and for whom various treatments will be most accurately provided The growth in evidence-based treatments, including medications and psychotherapies, increasingly allows us to treat specific symptoms in a replicable fashion Who does this work? Mental health practitioners who treat children and adolescents are in short supply. The United States’ Federal Bureau of Health Professions has named Child and Adolescent Psychiatry as the most underserved of all medical subspecialties. The current workforce consists of approximately 6300 Child and Adolescents psychiatrists (Thomas and Holzer, 2006), whereas the need has been estimated to be as high as 32,000 (AACAP, 2001). Child and Adolescent Psychiatrists are not alone, however, as the national need for child and adolescent social workers, educational specialists, and psychologists is equally as great. Present Supply of Child and Adolescent Psychiatrists There are currently about 7,000 child and adolescent psychiatrists practicing in the U.S. (AMA, 2010). Severe maldistribution of child psychiatric services in the U.S., with children in rural areas and areas of low SES having significantly reduced access. The ratio of child and adolescent psychiatrists per 100,000 youth ranges from 3.1 in Alaska to 21.3 in Massachusetts with an average of 8.7 (Thomas & Holzer, 2006). The number of child and adolescent psychiatrists will increase by about 30 percent to 8,312 by 2020. This is far less than the estimated 12,624 needed to meet demand. So, who really does this work? The vast majority of child and adolescent mental health services worldwide are provided by primary care practitioners, psychologists, and all manner of therapists, ranging from masters level social workers to marriage and family therapists. Nearly 85% of all psychotropic medications prescribed to children, including stimulants, antipsychotics, antidepressants, anxiolytics, and mood stabilizers, for example, are written by primary care practitioners (Goodwin et al, 2001). Yet these individuals generally receive no formal training in child and adolescent mental health (ACGME(b), 2007). What does a child/adolescent psychiatrist do for a living? Works with children, adolescents, and families who have problems with their: – Emotions – Behavior – Cognition/thinking Books Historical Perspective Valuing children in their own right has not been a priority of earlier societies “Childhood” itself is really an invention of the Victorian Age (mid-1800s onward) Prior to the 18th century, children’s mental health problems (unlike those of adults) were rarely mentioned in professional texts and communications During this time, virtually all etiologies for disordered behavior in children were based upon religious explanations (and magic to a lesser degree) The separation between medicine, science, religion, and magic was virtually nonexistent Humoral Theory Until the mid-1880s, the predominant theory used to explain all health problems Based upon the tradition of Galen, a 2nd century Greek physician Disease followed an excess in the production of any one of the four humors: Blood, yellow bile, black bile, & phlegm Physiologic imbalances that resulted were treated by nonspecific therapies (e.g., bleeding and purging) “Official” Child Maltreatment During the 17th – 18th centuries, as many as 2/3 of children died before their 5th birthday Many children were also subjected to harsh treatment or indifference by their parents Children were essentially the property of their parents Massachusetts’ Stubborn Child Act of 1654 permitted parents to put “stubborn” children to death for noncompliance Until the mid-1800s, the law allowed children with severe developmental disabilities to be kept in cellars and cages The Emergence of Social Conscience In the West, this process began in the 17th century when both a philosophy of humane care and institutions for social protection began to take root (following on industrialization) John Locke (1632 – 1704), an English philosopher, believed in individual rights and expressed the novel opinion that children should be raised with thought and care rather than indifference and harsh treatment Victor: The Wild Boy of Aveyron One of the first documented efforts to work with a special child was undertaken by Jean-Marc Itard (1775 – 1838) Victor was discovered by hunters in the woods of France at 11 – 12 years of age, having presumably lived alone all his life (or at least since age 2-3) He was nonverbal, inattentive, and insensitive to basic sensations (hot & cold) Itard believed that environmental stimulation could “humanize” Victor, but he was never fully socialized Philippe Pinel 1745 - 1826 The father of French psychiatry Discarded the long held notion of mental illness being due to demoniacal possession Began to classify his observations of the mentally ill Developed “moral treatment” and the first efforts at psychotherapy Physician to Napoleon Benjamin Rush (1746 – 1813) Physician, educator, writer, humanitarian B&R in Philadelphia, his practice was aimed at providing care for the poor He advocated for the abolition of slavery and signed the constitution His greatest contributions to medical science were the reforms he instituted in the care of the mentally ill during his thirty years of service as a senior physician at the Pennsylvania Hospital; he was more compassionate than was typical and replaced routine reliance on archaic procedures with careful clinical observation and study The year before he died, he published Medical Inquiries and Observations upon the Diseases of the Mind, the first American textbook on psychiatry Dorothea Dix (1802 – 1887) A teacher and social reformer for the treatment of the mentally ill. She established 32 humane mental hospitals for the treatment of troubled youth previously relegated to cellars and cages. She is somewhat neglected in the history books because she did not contribute to our understanding of the nature of mental disorders The Brief Emergence of a Biological Paradigm Successful treatment of infectious diseases strengthened the emerging belief that illness and disease (including mental illness) were biological processes Although the mental effects of some “biological” diseases came to be recognized (e.g., syphilis, Huntington’s, etc.), still little could be done to help those with mental illness and early attempts at biological explanations of mental illness were still biased in locating the cause of the illness within the individual Consequently, once again attitudes toward those with mental illness turned from cautious optimism to dire pessimism, hostility, fear and disdain During this time (the late 19th and early 20th centuries), emerging ideas around public health and medicine were essentially used against the mentally ill, including eugenics (sterilization) and segregation (institutionalization) to prevent the “insane” from interacting with the rest of society Psychoanalytic Theory In Freud’s day (the beginning of the 20th century) child psychiatrists and psychologists had become pessimistic about their ability to treat children’s mental disorders in a fashion other than palliative or custodial Although he believed in innate drives and predisposition (or that the origin of most mental illness was biological), he also believed in the importance of experience in the shaping of psychopathology; he was the first to give meaning to mental disorders by linking them to childhood experiences For the first time, the course of mental disorders was not seen as inevitable Structural Theories of Development Postulate a genetically determined capacity for the development of patterns, or systems, of behavior in which the child acts on the environment from the very beginning Major examples include psychoanalysis (Freud), psychosocial development (Erikson), and cognitive development (Piaget) The clinical implication of such structural theories is that some kind of reorganization within the child is required (e.g., resolution of an intrapsychic conflict, alteration of the family homeostasis, and acquisition of a new schema) to develop Freud’s Drive Theory Aggressive and sexual “drives” are the primary motivating forces in our quest for pleasure The end goal of development is sexual maturity; five stages are defined: 1. Oral Phase (Infancy, birth to 18 months) 2. Anal Phase (aka: Sadistic Phase, 18 – 36 months) 3. Phallic-Oedipal Phase (3 – 6 years) 4. Latency Phase (6 – 12 years) 5. Puberty and Adolescence Mahler’s Separation/Individuation Mahler’s intent was not to add new theory but to systematically observe and detail the unfolding of object relations in children and infants – Objective Relations is a more “modern” adaptation of psychoanalytic theory that places less emphasis on the drives of aggression and sexuality as motivational forces and more emphasis on human relationships as the primary motivational force in life; in other words, we seek relationships rather than pleasure (as Freud suggested). Six stages of development lead to normal object relations, predicated upon a recognition of “separateness”: 1. Normal Autism (birth to 2 months) 2. Symbiosis (2 – 5 months) 3. Differentiation (5 – 10 months) 4. Practicing Sub-Phase (10 – 18 months) 5. Rapprochement (18 – 24 months) 6. Object Constancy (2 – 5 years) Erikson’s Psychosocial Development A psychoanalytic theory comprising 8 stages, where “normal” development hinges upon successfully traversing 8 dichotomies: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Basic Trust vs. Mistrust (Birth to 1 year) Autonomy vs. Shame and Doubt (1 – 3 years) Initiative vs. Guilt (3 – 5 years) Industry vs. Inferiority (6 – 11 years) Identity vs. Role Diffusion (11 years – end of adolescence) 6. Intimacy vs. Isolation (21 – 40 years) 7. Generativity vs. Stagnation (40 –65 years) 8. Integrity vs. Despair (over 65 years) Bringing Analytic Theory to Children Anna Freud (1895 – 1984) was particularly important in expanding Freud’s ideas to children Melanie Klein (1882 – 1960) argued that children’s play could be interpreted in terms of unconscious fantasy Their combined work led to the development of child psychoanalysis and a recognition of the importance of nonverbal communication (e.g,. play, drawings, etc.) Piaget and Cognitive Development Piaget identified 4 major stages of cognitive development: 1. Sensorimotor Stage (birth to 2 years) 2. Preoperational Stage (2 to 7 years) 3. Concrete Operational Stage (7 years to adolescence) 4. Formal Operational Stage (adolescence) The Emergence of Behavioral Theory The development of “evidence based” treatments in mental health is traced to behavioral theory Early investigators’ (e.g., Pavlov, Skinner, and Watson) experimental research established the foundations of conditioning As evidence mounted, current treatments were questioned, including the use of orphanages. The increasing data for behavioral treatments led to increasing acceptance of these treatments, which by the 1970s had become (and remain) more the norm than the exception What is normal? Is it the converse of abnormal? When does an “issue” become a problem? Why do some children struggle more than others with the same symptoms or diagnosis? What accounts for the waxing and waning of symptoms over time? How can you help an abnormal child become normal? “All happy families are happy alike, all unhappy families are unhappy in their own way.” --Leo Tolstoy Anna Karenina 1877 Defining Psychological Disorders A pattern of behavioral, cognitive, emotional, and/or physical symptoms shown by an individual Characteristics must include: – – – Distress Disability Risk of further suffering or harm Developmental Pathways Multifinality: Various outcomes may stem from similar beginnings Equifinality: Similar outcomes may follow from different early experiences Risk Factors A variable that precedes a negative outcome and increases the chance of that outcome occurring Primary risk factors for child psychopathology include: poverty, inconsistent care giving, parental mental illness, death of a parent, homelessness, family break up, early pregnancy, neonatal complications, etc. Resilience Factors A variable that increases one’s ability to avoid negative outcomes despite a risk for psychopathology A much more difficult factor to categorize and may change over time depending upon the child and the environment; individual, family, and social factors will all have an impact How Are Children Faring Today? 1 in 6 children live in poverty in the U.S. and Canada 1 in 3 children will be “poor” at some point during childhood Low income is correlated with other disadvantages: – Less education, lower paying jobs, inadequate healthcare, singe-parent status, limited resources, poor nutrition, greater likelihood of exposure to violence Maltreatment & Non-Accidental Trauma Nearly 1 million verified cases of child abuse occur in the U.S. each year and 60,000 in Canada U.S. phone surveys of children 10 – 16 y/o estimate that over 1/3 (6 million) have experienced physical and/or sexual assaults during these years; not only by family members but also by people they may know from their communities and schools The Effect of Poverty Children from poor and disadvantaged backgrounds show 3x the rate of Conduct Disorder, 2x the rate of chronic illness, and >2x as many school problems (including hyperactivity and emotional disorders) The worse the poverty, the higher the incidence of childhood violence (3x greater in girls, 5x greater in boys) Sex Differences Girls – More internalizing problems: anxiety, depression, somatization, withdrawal – Girls who display resilience come from households that combine risk taking and independence with support from a female caregiver (e.g., mother, sister, grandmother, etc.) Sex Differences Boys – More externalizing problems: aggression, delinquency – Boys who display resilience come from households in which there is a positive male role model (e.g., father, older brother, grandfather, etc.) along with structure, rules, and some encouragement of emotional expression Sex Brain Differences Men tend to use 7,000 words on average per day and women tend to use 20,000 words on average per day Beginning in the teen years, females may get a larger dopamine “rush” from talking (and gossiping) than males (likened to an orgasm?) By 8 weeks in utero, testosterone produced by the testes begins to lead to enlargement of the amygdala where aggression behaviors appear to be housed Sex Brain Differences (2) Female babies are more interested in faces and boys more interested in objects Female babies increase their visual interest in faces by 400% in the first 3 months of life; whereas males demonstrate no change by 3 months Girls’ brains mature about 20% faster than boys’ until the mid-teen years (e.g., girls tend to develop language quicker, toilet train earlier, etc.) Brizendine, 2006 Race and Culture Minority children are overrepresented in some disorders (e.g., SUDS, delinquency, teen suicide); but once SES, gender, age, and referral status are controlled for, very few differences in the rate of children’s psychological disorder emerge Certainly the barriers to receiving and accessing care are greater among racial minorities and some cultures Racial and ethnic minorities are also neglected in studies; and most research into childhood psychopathology is not based upon diverse populations The Health Paradox of Adolescence Adolescence (15 – 24 y/o) is the physically healthiest time of life prior to adult declines – Improvement in strength, speed, reaction time, reasoning and immune function – Increased resistance to extremes of heat, cold, hunger, dehydration, and most types of injury Yet overall morbidity and mortality rates increase by 200-300% between late childhood (10 – 14) and adolescence (15 – 19) Why??? Primary Sources of Mortality in Teen Years The primary reasons for the increase in mortality and morbidity seen in adolescence are related to control of behavior, cognition, and emotions The most common causes of death in adolescence are: 1. Accidents 2. Homicide 3. Suicide LEADING CAUSES OF DEATH IN 15- TO 19-YEAR-OLDS — U N I T E D S T A T E S, 2001 — CAUSE # OF DEATHS Accidents Homicide Suicide Cancer Heart Disease Congenital Anomalies Chronic Lower Respiratory Disease Stroke Influenza and Pneumonia Blood Poisoning Anderson & Smith 2003 6646 1899 1611 732 347 255 74 68 66 57 1599 C.E14 Teenage Morbidity Depression increases from a 4% prevalence in childhood to around 17% in adolescence (lifetime prevalence) Substance abuse, eating disorders, psychotic disorders, etc, all increase greatly during teen years and lead to major increases in morbidity approaching (or reaching) adult levels Risk Taking Behavior Adolescence also heralds high rates of risk taking behavior, sensation-seeking, and erratic, emotionally influenced behavior How old were Romeo and Juliet? How well did Romeo and Juliet know each other? What Happens in Adolescence? Increase in: – Responsibility – Academic demands – Negative life events – Alone time – Friction between expected & actual life events – Ability to abstract – Intimate relationships So, why the increase in risk taking behavior? Darwinian argument: You need to become more of a risk taker and sensation seeker and adventurer when you strike out on your own and leave your safe home environment in order to survive Peer pressure Brain development: “Adolescence is like starting the engines with an unskilled driver.” Ron Dahl The Risky Brain Cognitive development (e.g., planning, reasoning, problem solving, logic, etc.) correlates more strongly with age and experience than with sexual and physical maturation While motor tracks are fully mature by about 15 – 16 y/o, cognitive tracks may not be fully developed until the mid-20s, and social/emotional tracks until the mid-30s Ventral Striatum vs. Prefrontal Growth and Functional Connectivity “Adolescent brain development represents a tension between early emerging ‘bottom up’ systems that express exaggerated reactivity to motivational stimuli and later maturing ‘top down’ cognitive control regions.” Casey & Jones, 2010 Cerebral Blood Flow The Prefrontal Cortex The PFC, which can act to inhibit impulsive, motivational drives is still somewhat immature in adolescents. When DA increases in the nucleus accumbens and a pleasure response occurs in the limbic system, an adolescent may have little ability to inhibit the motivation to seek out pleasurable responses, such as substance abuse or sex; or to sit still instead of being easily distracted by anxiety; or to take cognitive control of depressive thoughts Other Factors Affecting the Brain During Adolescence Hormones Pruning of serotonin circuits may lead to an increase in impulsivity Common maladaptive behaviors of adolescence, which also contribute to impairment in judgment: – Less sleep – Caffeine use – etc So, how do we know when there is a problem? or How do we know when a problem demands treatment? What’s in a Diagnosis? How does a diagnosis help you? How would you develop a diagnostic system? The Broken Arm Nosology DSM-I (1952) All “disorders of psychogenic origin or without clearly defined physical cause” were considered “reactions” – Schizophrenic reaction – Antisocial reaction – Psychoneurotic reactions included: Anxiety reaction, Dissociative reaction, Conversion reaction, Phobic reaction, Obsessive compulsive reaction, Depressive reaction Following upon Freud’s emphasis on the importance of mastering anxieties generated by characteristic conflicts at identifiable stages of psychosexual development (and attributing psychopathology to failure to resolve these conflicts), it was implied in the DSM-I, if not specifically stated, that anxiety was at the core of all diagnoses DSM-II (1968) Provided brief descriptions of characteristic signs and symptoms of the disorders but no criteria as such In 1973, during the 6th printing of the DSM-II, homosexuality was finally removed DSM-III (1980) A similar approach to the DSM-II was followed here; but now diagnostic criteria for the various disorders were provided Better inter-rater reliability and evidence of predictive reliability Specified a group of disorders as “usually first evident in infancy, childhood, or adolescence” – Reactive attachment disorder, separation anxiety disorder, overanxious disorder, and avoidant disorder – Additionally, the anxiety diagnoses applicable to adults were available for diagnosing children DSM-III-R (1987) Both the DSM-III and the DSM-III-R were criticized by some researchers, particularly regarding childhood diagnoses, due to limited evidence of validity Many clinicians of the psychodynamic tradition objected to the atheoretical approach of the DSM-III and to the elimination of the term neurosis – Theoretical considerations were discarded in favor of diagnostic reliability – This approach contributed to the subsequent flourishing of evidence-based research – Since this time, diagnostic criteria have been increasingly put to the test and retained, removed or reconceptualized DSM-IV Diagnoses DSM = Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of the American Psychiatric Association “Statistical” because a given number of symptoms are necessary to make a diagnosis Diagnoses are phenomenological or symptom driven and may be the result of biological, psychological, and social factors Axis System Axis I – Clinical mental disorders – V codes (a focus of clinical attention, but not a proper diagnosis) Parent/child relational problems Sibling relation problems Child abuse or neglect, etc. Axis II – Personality Disorders – Mental Retardation – issues that affect all aspects of an individual’s functioning (global impact on all aspects of the individual’s life) Axis System (2) Axis III – Major medical diagnoses Axis IV – Psychosocial and environmental issues (aka, “stressors”) that contribute to the disorder Axis V – Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) – a numeric scale (0 through 100) used to rate social, occupational and psychological functioning