Welcome We’re glad that you are here! NARR Board Michelle Adams Byrne Susan Binns George Braucht Chris Edrington Beth Fisher Tom Hill Jason Howell Cassandra Jackson Curtiss Kolodney Ted McAllister Kevin O’Hare Dave Sheridan Susan Smith Nancy Steiner Fred Way Texas Recovery Inn Tennessee YANA, AHHAP Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles Minnesota, Colorado St. Paul Sober Living Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina Hope Homes Washington, D.C. FAVOR Texas Soberhood Georgia Centers for Disease Control Connecticut CCAR Georgia Haven Homes Michigan Touchstone Recovery California Sober Living Network Michigan Network 180 Florida Sanctuary Pennsylvania PARR NARR: May 2012 Consider the fact that… • People in early recovery often return from institutions or programs to environments that support alcohol and/or drug addictive lifestyles. • Recovery residences provide a safe, healthy, community-based alternative for facilitating recovery at all stages of the recovery process. • Outcome studies show, the longer an individual remains in a recovery/treatment environment, the greater are her or his chances of sustaining recovery. Existing Challenges • Recovery housing options are limited in most places in the country. • Much of the existing capacity is of poor quality and provides limited recovery support. • Standards and technical assistance limited in most places. • These are not inevitable outcomes. NARR Addresses the Challenges • Rigorous standards based on best practices. • Supports multiple pathways to recovery. • Promotes a long-term, sustainable recovery model. • Research: outcomes studies, strength and needs assessments, under-served populations. • Addresses ongoing housing discrimination issues and is a voice for those that have none. • Facilitates creative partnerships and advocacy. • Promotes legitimacy for recovery residences through research, and advocacy. • Provides constructive, rehabilitative alternatives to incarceration. Recovery Residence Study 24 months following Residential Treatment Criterion “Usual aftercare” Recovery Residence Substance Use 64.8% 31.3% Monthly Income $440 $989 9% 3% Incarceration Jason et. al., 2006 Recovery Residences = Housing as Recovery Support • Addiction is a chronic disease often treated as an acute condition. • Recovery is a process that takes time. • Positive recovery outcomes are strongly associated with duration of recovery support. Recovery Residences in the Continuum of Recovery Acute care (inpatient, medical, psychiatric) High Recovery residences: Enter at any level Level 4 Level 3 Service intensity Level 2 Level 1 Low Stabilization Recovery process duration Long-term recovery: Independent, meaningful living in the community Levels of Support Level I Peer Run Level II Monitored Level III Supervised Level IV Service Provider • Peer recovery support in a democratically run living environment. • Peer recovery support and structure implemented by house rules with an emphasis on community and accountability. • Peer recovery support plus extended-care programming with an emphasis on (re)habilitative life skill development. • Peer recovery support plus life skills and clinical programming. Standards Criteria Administrative Services Environmental Staff • Organizational structures that create and maintain safe, supportive living environments. • Elements that cultivate community culture and individual recovery. • Dwellings that are safe and recovery conducive. • Human resource policies and plans that provide appropriate levels of support. Housing Rights Home of Choice (FHA) Community Integration (Olmstead) Dignity, Free of Stigma People in Recovery “disabled” a protected class (ADA, FHA) (WHO) Safe, Stable Home (SAMHSA) Fair Housing Protection Equal access to appropriate housing. Equally enforced neighborhood restrictions. Local governments must make “reasonable accommodation” for persons with disabilities. Local governments to remove barriers to disabled housing access. Not Protected Higher occupancy than natural families in the same neighborhood. Unsafe conditions, poorly maintained property. Illicit substance use; criminal activity; and threats to health, safety & property. Discrimination on the Rise Nationwide Problem Not In My Back Yard (NIMBY) politics Local Governments Actively discriminate, undermine protection State governments Undermine protection Government Discrimination Zoning restrictions. Low occupancy limits. Conditional use permits, high fees. Moratoria. Unreasonable safety, inspection requirements. Unreasonable “reasonable accommodation”. NIMBY Myths and Fears American Planning Association finds these statements about Recovery Residences to be FALSE. Decrease property values Increase crime Increase drug/alcohol usage Are bad neighbors Undermine neighborhood character Overburden infrastructure Real Costs of Housing Discrimination Displaces residents, destabilizes recovery. Decreases number of recoverysupportive environments, opportunities. Creates barriers to open new homes. Increases operating costs, financial burdens on residents. Real Costs of Housing Discrimination (cont’d) Undermines many social services programs Increases cost of addiction: homelessness, criminal justice, healthcare, family impacts … Jeopardizes HUD funding Wastes precious resources on expensive battles Polarizes communities, fuels stigma NARR’s Housing Rights Solution Unified voice & advocacy training Locally, statewide & nationally Gain clarity from DOJ/HUD Create information/resources clearinghouse Build alliances Recovery, mental health & fair housing Encourage public-private partnerships - Legal, cost effective oversight - Streamline reasonable accommodation - Build quality capacity NARR at Year 1 • The Standard for Recovery Residences. • Levels of Recovery Support. • Standards for regional affiliate organizations. • First summary of recovery residences is underway with William White, Doug Polcin, Leonard Jason, & Amy Mericle . • Participation from highest-quality recovery housing organizations nationally. NARR at Year 1 • 1,800 recovery residences. • Capacity to serve 24,000 residents. • 13 regional recovery residence provider organizations. • Three additional regional organizations in process of affiliation. • Five regional organizations in formation with NARR technical assistance. NARR: May 2012 Collaborative Possibilities “How can you help?” NARR Supporting You You Supporting NARR Organization Liaison Letters of support or endorsement In-kind Support In-kind Support Subject matter expertise Funding Opportunities Technical assistance Develop Affiliates