COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH AND WELLBEING: A CASE STUDY JANAKA JAYAWICKRAMA, PhD SEPTEMBER 2010 Community-University Collaborations: Exploring Models, Sharing Good Practice Durham University GENESIS • UNHCR partnership to evaluate mental health and wellbeing interventions for refugees in Malawi. • Additional accompanying field work was conducted with support from UNHCR. PURPOSE • To analyse the nature of individually and communally focussed mental health and wellbeing interventions for developing country communities that are affected by conflicts. RATIONALE TO THE STUDY • International Agencies including the UN have identified how wellbeing challenges lack appropriate policies and interventions implying that evaluations are required that include further investigations of the traditional knowledge systems of communities. MOST INFLUENTIAL LITERATURE Name Subject Derek Summerfield – Critique of Mental Health in Humanitarian Assistance 1995, 1999, 2005 Arthur Kleinman Risk Reduction Vs Uncertainty/ Medical – 1988, 2005, 2006 Anthropology/ Traditional Knowledge Systems John Van Eenwyk – 2002 Traditional Knowledge Systems and Mental Healing of Torture Amartya Sen – Development as Freedom 1993, 1999 MOST INFLUENTIAL LITERATURE Name Subject Lao Tzu – circa Tao Te Ching – Ancient Knowledge 100 BC Walpola Compassion, Uncertainty and Rahula – 2003 Danger Religious Texts Different Perspectives on Life, Mental Health and Wellbeing Folk Stories Different Traditional Knowledge Perspectives on Wellbeing MAINSTREAM LITERATURE BODY Clinical Psychology and Trauma/ PTSD • • • • • • International Standards and Practice Wellbeing and Capability Uncertainty and dangers are abnormal in life situations. Suffering is avoidable. Human conditions can be controlled. Interventions to address suffering should be objective. The individual is the most important entity in social settings. Life is predictable / manageable. What are the strengths and weaknesses of individual mental health and wellbeing interventions and their appropriateness in developing country, conflict affected communities? (Source: Author) Subjectivism Realism Critical Positivist UNHCR Malawi Place Evaluation of Programme Purpose Re-examine 163 Responses Quantitative Assessment Judgement of Practice: difficult to analyse information Judgement and Analysis 16 Detailed Responses Qualitative Analysis ? THE RESEARCH PROCESS (Source: Author) Burden of policy Different research steps Policy Programme Burden of delivery Practice Evaluation Criteria (Adapted from OECD) 1 Theoretical basis / Relevance 2 Coverage 3 Efficiency 4 Effectiveness 5 Impact 6 Community 7 Sustainability 3. Literature review and secondary readings on policies 2. Qualitative: Key interviews 1. Quantitative: Evaluations FROM PRACTICE TO POLICY (Source: Author) MALAWI • One of the poorest countries in Sub-Saharan Africa. • Evaluation of mental health and wellbeing interventions of UNHCR partners. • Mainly refugee communities from other African countries. EVALUATIVE JUDGEMENT Criterion Aspect Measured /Assessed Theoretical basis Developed by foreign consultants and staff in Geneva. Quantitative Coverage coverage of refugees. However, there are many gaps in qualitative coverage. Source of Viewpoint UNHCR Staff members and policy documents Refugee communities and field staff of UNHCR partners Methodology Interviews and review of documents Interviews and observations EVALUATIVE JUDGEMENT Criterion Aspect Measured /Assessed Social, political, Efficiency cultural and economic problems in project delivery. Effectiveness Objectives set by UNHCR are not agreed by partners or refugee communities. Source of Viewpoint Refugee communities and field staff of UNHCR partners UNHCR Staff, Refugee communities and field staff of UNHCR partners Methodology Interviews and observations Interviews and observations EVALUATIVE JUDGEMENT Criterion Impact Aspect Measured Source of Methodology /Assessed No changes to refugee conditions in terms of policy or practice. Viewpoint Government Interviews and of Malawi, observations UNHCR Staff, Refugee communities and field staff of UNHCR partners EVALUATIVE JUDGEMENT Criterion Community Sustainability Aspect Measured Source of Methodology /Assessed No ownership or responsibility over activities. Short term planning. No concepts of sustainability. Viewpoint Refugee communities Interviews and observations Government of Malawi, UNHCR Staff and field staff of UNHCR partners Interviews , observations and review of documents EMERGING THEMES Population Emerging Themes Malawi: Uncertainty and dangers Going back to old life styles Conflict are unavoidable Moving on and planning for affected Suffering is part of being a future refugee human Worry about the future communities Not taking action to deal Importance of community with suffering and family Taking action to deal Value of religious support with suffering (i.e. God) Helplessness and Experience of torture and powerlessness violence Sadness and Community support unhappiness Security and protection Needing help DISCUSSION: COMMUNITY PERSPECTIVE Community Different understanding of uncertainty and dangers to that of the academic and policy worlds Tendency for activities of agencies to be largely irrelevant Use of traditional knowledge systems: religions, folk stories and traditional healing/medicine WELLBEING Interventions (insensitive to community systems) – maintaining a total greater wellbeing, but insensitivity leads to recurring uncertainties and dangers Community systems (Sensitive to outside pressure) – maintain a low level from an outside view, but sustainable wellbeing Uncertainties and Dangers TIME Source: Author Retrieved knowledge systematised and validated within its own cultural setting Setting up of ecologically sound knowledge systems to deal with suffering and improve wellbeing Creative and flexible processes of implementing knowledge systems Preconditions Trust Conformity Genuine engagement Transparency Accountability Equal participation Ownership and responsibility Source: Author Knowledge retrieval through collaboration between insiders and outsiders BIBLIOGRAPHY Collins, A.E. (2009) Disaster and Development, Routledge Perspectives in Development Series, London Craig, D., Porter, D. (2003), “Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers: A New Convergence” World Development, 31(1), 53–69 Das, V., Kleinman, A., Ramphele, M., Lock, M. and Reynolds, P. (eds) (2001), Remaking a World: Violence, Social Suffering and Recovery, Berkeley: University of California Press Hancock, G., (1989), Lords of Poverty: the power, prestige, and corruption of the international aid business, The Atlantic Monthly Press, New York BIBLOGRAPHY Jayawickrama, J, (2007), Concepts of Care: A Workbook for Community Practitioners, DDC and UNHCR, Geneva Kleinman, A. Das, V. and Lock, M. (eds) (1997), Social Suffering, Berkeley: University of California Press Kleinman, A, (2006), What really matters: Living a Moral Life Amidst Uncertainty and Danger, Oxford University Press Sen A. (1993). Capability and Well-being, In Nussbaum and Sen (Eds.) The Quality of Life. Oxford: Clarendon Press BIBLIOGRAPHY Sen. A. (1999), Development as Freedom, New York: Random House Smillie, I and Minear, L (2003), The quality of money: Donor behaviour in humanitarian financing, An independent study, Humanitarianism and War Project, The Feinstein International Famine Center, MA Summerfield, D., (2005a), What exactly is emergency or disaster ‘mental health’?, Bulletin of the World Health Organization; 83(1), (pp.76-77) UNHCR (2007) A Community –Based Approach to UNHCR Operations JANAKA JAYAWICKRAMA, PhD COMMUNITY WELLBEING PROGRAMME DISASTER AND DEVELOPMENT CENTRE SCHOOL OF THE BUILT AND NATURAL ENVIRONMENT NORTHUMBRIA UNIVERSITY j.jayawickrama@northumbria.ac.uk