Digital Access In Context: Mass Digitization of Manuscript Collections Jody L. DeRidder University of Alabama Libraries Free Powerpoint Templates jlderidder@ua.edu Page 1 Libraries organize information… primarily books. Trinity College Library, Dublin, as captured by Candida Höfer in her book Libraries (Thames and Hudson ,UK: 2005). Free Powerpoint Templates Page 2 A digital object may belong in MANY potential virtual collections… Slavery African Americans Sheet Music Tombigbee River Southern History … and more “Gum Tree Canoe,” Published by G.P. Reed (Boston: 1847). Wade Hall collection of Southern History and Culture, Hoole Special Collections, University of Alabama Libraries. … but it originated from Free Powerpoint Templates ONE SINGLE ANALOG collection. Page 3 HOLDER ID COLLECTION ID Free Powerpoint u0003_0001980_0000001 is the first digitizedTemplates item in the MSS 1980 collection Page 4 Bringing Order to Chaos Holder ID: u0003 Clarity Collection ID: 0000023 Low cost Simple Extensible Item ID: 0000007 Sequence ID: 0005 Archival File: u0003_0000023_0000007_0005.tif Free Powerpoint Templates Page 5 Finding Aid for Search & Context Free Powerpoint Templates Page 6 The Information at Hand For All Content: • • • • • • • • • Rights statements Repository information Collection name Collection number For Each Item: URL to collection Language • Box number OCLC code • Folder number Knowledge of digital origin • Item sequence Awareness of electronic form • Extent • Item identifier • MIME type • URL to item • Record creation date Free Powerpoint Templates Page 7 Record Stubs Free Powerpoint Templates Page 8 Box, Folder, Sequence …all in the file names Example: u0003_0000252_4701004_0001.tif u0003 u = university content 0003 = manuscript materials 0000252 = MS 252 4701004 47 = Box 47 01 = Folder 1 004 = item 4 in sequence 0001 = first page of document Free Powerpoint Templates Page 9 Delivery Via Finding Aid Free Powerpoint Templates Page 10 Automated… All The Way Quality Control File movement Generation of derivatives Generation of MODS Linking into EAD Transfer to web directory and archive Indexing and display in Acumen Free Powerpoint Templates Page 11 How long does it take? Old method: 8.25 min. / scan New method: 4.34 min. / scan Processing: reduced. QC: reduced. Metadata time: none. 47% LESS TIME! Free Powerpoint Templates Page 12 What does it cost? Old method: $2.47 /scan New method: $0.80 /scan Processing: reduced. QC: reduced. Metadata costs: none. 68% CHEAPER!! Free Powerpoint Templates Page 13 Usability Testing: Tasks 1: 2: 3: 4: Locate a piece of legal correspondence. Locate an estate document. Locate some kind of deed. Locate a family history document or some other family item. Free Powerpoint Templates Page 14 Usability Testing: Measures Efficiency: Time on task, number of clicks Effectiveness: Successful task completion Satisfaction: Ranking of perceived difficulty and positive vs. negative comments Learnability: Improvement in time, clicks, and success over 4 tasks in a single session Free Powerpoint Templates Page 15 Usability Testing: Participants 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 Participant Number G G U G G G S G U G U U U U U Educational Status* X X X Educational Background in History X X X X X X X Previous Special X X Collections Experience X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Previous Digital Collections Experience X X X X English as a Second Language * U=Undergraduate, G=Graduate Student, PG=Post graduate volunteer, S=University staff Free Powerpoint Templates 17 18 19 20 21 U P G G G G X X X X X X X X X Page 16 Results: Efficiency, Effectiveness, Satisfaction of item-level described content, compared to finding aid access: Efficiency: 35% less time, 48% fewer clicks Not surprising: finding aid provides more context. Effectiveness: Success rates 7.5% higher Not surprising: no search-in-page function or navigation box. Satisfaction: Preferred by a ratio of 3:1 Not surprising: these are novice users. Free Powerpoint Templates Page 17 Notable Comparison Between Participants English as a second language Difficulty with both interfaces! • 51% more time and 10% less success in the itemlevel interface • 41% more time and 13% less success in the finding aid interface • 80% preferred the item-level interface Free Powerpoint Templates Page 18 Notable Comparison Between Participants No previous experience with digital collections: Found finding aid interface significantly easier than those with digital collection experience! • • • 42% less time 27% fewer clicks 12% more success Free Powerpoint Templates Page 19 Results: Learnability Paired-sample t- test comparing task 1 to task 4: Paired Differences 95% Confidence Interval of Mean Pair 1 FirstClickJem1 - Std. Std. Error Deviation Mean the Difference Lower Sig. (2- Upper t tailed) df -.39286 3.30605 .88358 -2.30171 1.51600 -.445 13 .664 .00000 2.44949 .65465 -1.41429 1.41429 .000 13 1.000 .714 2.813 .752 -.910 2.338 .950 13 .359 -1.071 8.713 2.329 -6.102 3.959 -.460 13 .653 2.143 13.061 3.491 -5.398 9.684 .614 13 .550 5.786 44.295 11.838 -19.789 31.361 .489 13 .633 -.14286 .53452 .14286 -.45148 .16577 -1.000 13 .336 FirstClickJem4 Pair 2 FirstClickCab1 - FirstClickCab4 Pair 3 TotClickJem1 TotClickJem4 Pair 4 TotClickCab1 TotClickCab4 Pair 5 TotTimeJem1 TotTimeJem4 Pair 6 TotTimeCab1 TotTimeCab4 Pair 8 EffectCab1 EffectCab4 No significant differences Free Powerpoint Templates Page 20 Conclusions Don’t compare item level access to finding aid access; they aren’t comparable. Find ways to make the EAD more user-friendly. Certain images and/or photos on this page are the copyrighted property of 123RF Limited, its Contributors or Licensed Partners and are being used with permission under license. These images and/or photos may not be copied or downloaded without permission from 123RF Limited. Free Powerpoint Templates Page 21 References Joyce Celeste Chapman, “Observing Users: An Empirical Analysis of User Interaction with Online Finding Aids,” Journal of Archival Organization 8, no. 1 (2010) http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15332748.2010.484361 Cory Nimer and J. Gordon Daines III, “What Do You Mean It Doesn’t Make Sense? Redesigning Finding Aids from the User’s Perspective,” Journal of Archival Organization 6, no. 4 (2008), http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15332740802533214 Wendy Scheir, “First Entry: Report on a Qualitative Exploratory Study of Novice User Experience with Online Finding Aids,” Journal of Archival Organization 3, no. 4 (2006), http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J201v03n04_04 Tom Tullis and Bill Albert, Measuring the User Expereience: Collecting, Analyzing, and Presenting Usability Metrics (Burlington, MA: Morgan Kaufmann, 2008, 92-94. Tim West, Kirill Fesenko, and Laura Clark Brown, “Extending the Reach of Southern Sources: Proceeding to Large-Scale Digitization of Manuscript Collections,” Final Grant Report for the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation, Southern Historical Collection, University Library, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, June 2009, http://www.lib.unc.edu/mss/archivalmassdigitization/download/extending_the_r each.pdf Elizabeth Yakel, “Encoded Archival Description: Are Finding Aids Boundary Spanners or Barriers for Users?” Journal of Archival Organization 2, no. 1 & 2 (2004), http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J201v02n01_06. Free Powerpoint Templates Page 22 For More Information: • University of Alabama Libraries, “Septimus D. Cabaniss Papers Digitization Project.” Project Site: http://www.lib.ua.edu/libraries/hoole/cabaniss Wiki: http://www.lib.ua.edu/wiki/digcoll/index.php/Cabaniss Display: http://acumen.lib.ua.edu/u0003_0000252 • Jody L. DeRidder, “Leveraging EAD for Low-Cost Access to Digitized Collections at the University of Alabama Libraries,” Journal of Library Innovation, 2:1 (2011), http://www.libraryinnovation.org/article/view/69 • DeRidder, Jody L.; Presnell, Amanda Axley; and Walker, Kevin W. "Leveraging Encoded Archival Descriptions for Access to Digital Content: A Cost and Usability Analysis," in • American Archivist (Spring/Summer 2012), Vol. 75, Iss. 1. • . Jody L. DeRidder UniversityFree of Alabama Libraries Powerpoint Templates Page 23 jlderidder@ua.edu