Chapter 7 Auditing Internal Control over Financial Reporting McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Reporting on Internal Control Management of all public companies must report on ICFR in the 10-K (annual report, annual financial statements, etc.) filed with the SEC Auditors, if it is a public company of at least $75,000,000 market cap, must also perform an integrated audit engagement resulting in… – An opinion on the financial statements, and – An opinion on the ICFR LO# 1 Management Responsibilities under SarBox Section 404 Management of all publicly traded companies must issue an internal control report that accepts responsibility for establishing and maintaining “adequate” ICFR. The investigation by management and the subsequent management report is very important to auditors because auditors rely somewhat on management, instead of completely “reinventing the wheel” in their audit of ICFR. 7-3 LO# 1 Management Responsibilities under Section 404 Management must also comply with the following requirements in order for the external auditor to complete an audit of ICFR. 1. Evaluate the effectiveness of the entity’s ICFR using suitable control criteria. 2. Support the evaluation with sufficient evidence, including documentation. 3. Present a written assessment regarding the effectiveness of the entity’s ICFR as of the end of the entity’s most recent fiscal year. 7-4 LO# 2 Auditor Responsibilities under Section 404 and AS5 • In addition to management reporting on ICFR, the entity’s independent auditor must audit and report on the effectiveness of ICFR, if it is a public company, and if it has market capitalization of at least $75,000,000. • However, if it is a public company with market capitalization of less than $75,000,000, only management has to report on ICFR effectiveness. •The auditor, if he reports on ICFR, must conduct an integrated audit of the entity’s ICFR and its financial statements. 7-5 LO# 3 ICFR Defined ICFR is defined as a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP. Controls include procedures that: 1. Pertain to the maintenance of records that fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company. 2. Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded in accordance with GAAP. 3. Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets. 7-6 LO# 4 Relationships: Deficiencies, significant deficiencies, & material weaknesses Material weakness Significant deficiency Deficiency LO# 4 Internal Control Deficiencies Defined A control deficiency exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent or detect misstatements on a timely basis. A significant deficiency is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting that is less severe than a material weakness, yet important enough to merit attention by those responsible for oversight of the company's financial reporting. 7-8 LO# 4 Internal Control Deficiencies Defined A control deficiency may be serious enough that it is to be considered not only a significant deficiency but also a material weakness in the system of internal control. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in ICFR, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. As illustrated on the next slide, the auditor must consider two dimensions of each control deficiency detected: Likelihood and Magnitude: 7-9 Internal Control Deficiencies Defined M A G N I T U D E Material Material weakness Not material but significant Significant deficiency LO# 4 Control deficiency Not material or significant Remote Reasonably possible or probable LIKELIHOOD 7-10 How likely IC will fail to prevent or detect misstatement? The nature of the financial statement accounts, disclosures, and assertions; The susceptibility of the related asset or liability to loss or fraud; The subjectivity, complexity, or extent of judgment required to determine the amount; The interaction or relationship of the control with other controls, e.g. whether there are redundant (compensating) controls; The interaction of the deficiencies; and The possible future consequences of the deficiency. AS 5, par. 65 and 68 Assuming a misstatement occurs, what will its magnitude be? In other words, how material a misstatement would this be? AS 5, par. 66 phrases this a bit differently but substantively that’s what it says. Research shows that some years management and auditors have had such difficulty identifying material weaknesses that they relied more often than not on the four Indicators of Material Weaknesses (AS 5 par. 69) on the next slide Indicators of Material Weakness • • • • Identification of fraud, whether or not material, on the part of senior Management (e.g. CEO, CFO, CAO, Controller) Restatement of previously issued financial statements to reflect the correction of a material misstatement (per SFAS 154) Identification by the auditor of a material misstatement of financial statements in the current period in circumstances that indicate that the misstatement would not have been detected by the company's ICFR; and Ineffective oversight of the company's external financial reporting and ICFR by the company's audit committee LO# 5 Management’s Assessment Process Management must follow a top-down, risk-based approach: 1. Identify financial reporting risks and controls. 2. Evaluate evidence about the operating effectiveness of ICFR. 3. Consider which locations to include in the evaluation. 7-15 LO# 5 Framework Used by Management to Conduct Its Assessment Most entities use the framework developed by COSO. This framework identifies three primary objectives of internal control: (1) reliable financial reporting; (2) efficiency and effectiveness of operations; and (3) compliance with laws and regulations. 7-16 LO# 5 Identify Entity-Level Controls 7-17 LO# 5 Management’s Documentation •Management must develop sufficient documentation to support its assessment of the effectiveness of ICFR. This documentation may take many forms. If the investigation of ICFR by the company, and the documentation of the investigation, are not good enough, the auditor may not be able to express an opinion and thus will have to issue a disclaimer. 7-18 LO# 6 Integrating the Audits of Internal Control and Financial Statements • An integrated audit is composed of the audits of internal control and the financial statements. The control testing impacts the planned substantive procedures. Also, the results of the substantive procedures are considered in the evaluation of internal control. • Thus, one CPA firm must perform both the audit of the financial statements and the audit of ICFR. Tests of internal control Substantive audit procedures 7-19 LO# 6 Performing an Audit of ICFR Figure 7-2 7-20 LO# 7 Planning the Audit of ICFR The planning process is similar to the process used for the audit of financial statements. Consider the following: – Risk assessment and the risk of fraud. – Scaling the audit. – Using the work of others. 7-21 LO# 7 Special Consideration: Using the Work of Others A major consideration for the external auditor is how much work is to be performed by others. In determining the extent to which the auditor may use the work of others, the auditor should: (1) evaluate the nature of the controls subjected to the work of others, (2) evaluate the competence and objectivity of the individuals who performed the work, and (3) test some of the work performed by others to evaluate the quality and effectiveness of their work. As the risk associated with the control being tested increases, the external auditor should do more of the work. 7-22 LO# 8 Using a Top-Down Approach Figure 7-3 7-23 LO# 8 Identifying Significant Accounts Size and composition of the account Susceptibility to misstatement due to errors or fraud Volume of activity, complexity, and homogeneity of the individual transactions processed through the account or reflected in the disclosure Nature of the account or disclosure Accounting and reporting complexities associated with the account or disclosure 7-24 LO# 8 Identifying Significant Accounts Exposure to losses in the account Possibility of significant contingent liabilities arising from the activities reflected in the account or disclosure Existence of related-party transactions in the account Changes from the prior period in account or disclosure characteristics 7-25 LO# 8 Sources of Misstatements Understand the flow of transactions related to the relevant assertions Identify the points within the entity’s processes at which a misstatement could arise that would be material Identify the controls that management has implemented to address these potential misstatements Identify the controls that management has implemented over the prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could result in a material misstatement of the financial statements 7-26 LO# 8 Select Controls to Test 7-27 LO# 9 Test the Design and Operating Effectiveness of Controls Evaluate design Test and evaluate operating effectiveness – Nature: Inquiry, Inspection of documents, observation, and reperformance. – Timing: Interim vs. “as of” date – Extent: Consider (1) Nature of the control; (2) Frequency of operation; and (3) Importance of the control. 7-28 Auditor Communication Auditor communication is of three types – The auditor must give an opinion as to ICFR to the public. This is included in the company’s annual report filed with the SEC – The auditor must communicate certain additional things to the audit committee (almost all public companies now have an audit committee) – The auditor should communicate certain additional things to management Auditor’s opinion as to ICFR given to the public (see examples at end of Ch. 7) Possible opinions – Unqualified if ICFR is effective Can be “standard” or can be “modified” – Adverse if ICFR is not effective In other words, Adverse opinion if there are one or more material weaknesses – Disclaimer if serious scope limitation In other words, something prevented the auditor from fully completing a proper audit of ICFR Auditor must communicate certain additional things to audit committee Not only material weaknesses (which are communicated to the public), but also significant deficiencies, must be communicated to the audit committee Auditor should communicate certain additional things to management According to AS5, not only material weaknesses, and significant deficiencies, but also other control deficiencies, that the auditor learns of, should be communicated to the management of the company LO# 11 Remediation of a Material Weakness Remediation means fixing a material weakness in the ICFR – If a material weakness is fixed before the “as of” date, there must be sufficient time for both management and the auditor to test the operating effectiveness of the control – if not, an adverse opinion is still issued. 7-33 LO# 12 Written Representations In addition to the management representations obtained as part of a financial statement audit, the auditor also obtains written representations from management related to the audit of ICFR. Failure to obtain written representations from management, including management’s refusal to furnish them, constitutes a limitation on the scope of the audit sufficient to preclude an unqualified opinion. 7-34 Auditor Documentation Requirements LO# 13 The auditor must properly document the processes, procedures, judgments, and results relating to the audit of internal control. When an entity has effective ICFR, the auditor should be able to perform sufficient testing of controls to assess control risk for all relevant assertions at a low level. 7-35 LO# 13 Auditor Documentation Requirements The auditor’s documentation of the process, procedures, judgments and results relating to the audit of ICFR should include: 1. The auditor’s understanding and evaluation of the design of each of the components of ICFR; 2. The process used to determine the points at which misstatements could occur; 3. The extent to which the auditor relied upon the work of others; and 4. The evaluation of any deficiencies discovered or other findings which could result in a report modification. 7-36 LO# 14 Other Reporting Issues 1. Management’s report is incomplete or improperly presented. 2. The auditor decides to refer to the report of other auditors. 3. A significant subsequent event has occurred. 4. There is additional information contained in management’s report on internal control. 5. There is a remediated material weakness at an interim date (AS 4). 7-37 LO# 16 Advanced Module 1: Use of Service Organizations Management and the auditor should perform the following procedures with respect to the activities performed by the service organization: (1) obtain an understanding of the controls at the service organization that are relevant to the entity’s internal control and the controls at the user organization over the activities of the service organization; and (2) obtain evidence that the controls that are relevant to management’s assessment and the auditor’s opinion are operating effectively. This can be accomplished by obtaining a Type 2 report from the service organization’s auditor. 7-38 LO# 18 Advanced Module 2: Computer-Assisted Audit Techniques Computer-assisted audit techniques (CAATs) include: • Generalized audit software packages. • Custom audit software. • Test data. 7-39 Advanced Module 2: Generalized Audit Software LO# 18 ACL is an example of GAS 7-40 End of Chapter 7 7-41