Australian Strategy Key Elements & Questions DRAFT: 25 June 2014 Building Blocks of Australian Strategy Focused leadership & clear narrative Target for Growth + Aspirational Goals Working Groups operationalise Goals Design – Governance - Implementation Mobilise Capital Investable Products and Enterprises Drive Deal Flow Government engagement & policy Driving practical actions toward doing & delivery Building Blocks of the Australian Strategy Policy Drive deal flow focus, identity & narrative Engagement, education & clear priorities Expand catalytic capital & remove barriers Australian Advisory Board meet industry identified need for leadership Create meaningful engagement with government and regulators on priorities Galvanise action with sense of urgency to seize opportunity for Australia to be significant contributor Target value add for government including social issues that are pressure points Create a clear narrative, socialised through strategic communications plan Identify quick wins linked to priorities Stress test products targeting latent demand e.g. social sector Build economic case for tax incentives & catalytic capital Platform of expertise, including sources of funding, investment models, project supply, and measurement Leadership dedicated Set aspirational, grounded 5 year target for impact assets with strategic roadmap for implementation Demonstrate strength of interest and appetite across sectors, backed up with capital Seek central contact point in governments for social impact investment activities, and links to and between them Encourage allocations from institutions Enable doing and delivery through feasibility, prototyping and incubation of transactions Build from industry strengths, e.g. infrastructure Build bottom up data and surveys to measure industry growth Filtering Criteria Ambitious & Catalytic Will it create significant changes in impact investing practice or opportunities that will drive a step change in the field? Enabling Does it create more opportunity for and remove barriers to more participants to be active and mobilise capital and demand in ways that clearly demonstrate potential and “prime the pump” for pipeline? Broad Based Will it garner support from across sectors and political orientations, rather than narrowly tailored to a given industry or ideology? Focused on Doing & Delivery Does it drive toward practical delivery and identify clear and actionable steps for effective action or solutions? Priority Outcomes and Actions Educate and Mobilise Capital 5 year target for impact assets Set Aspirational Goals Develop Universe of Investable Products and Enterprises 5 year target for number of deals and funds Robust metrics and Social Investment Bank/ performance data for key Fund > A$350m, to catalyse social issue and service SIBs, social infrastructure areas and entrprise Benchmarks for % allocations Practical Delivery short term Demonstrate strength of interest and appetite from across sectors Allocations from key institutions Mission & program related investments Design to build product existing asset categories eg. infrastructure, government credit, fixed interest Investment & contract readiness fund >A$20m Drive Deal Flow Clearing House/ Exchange Measurable change in awareness & appetite of advisers/ gatekeepers More & better intermediation Multi-disciplinary teams undertake feasibility Mobilise latent demand Guidance on fiduciary requirements & structures Platform for case studies, tools and what works Policy Levers & Actions Practical Actions Policy Initiatives Catalytic capital, drive impact deal flow Reorient budget based funding to catalytic capital Initiate impact funds, toward Social Impact Bank/Fund Expand range of funding and financing options for social policy Enable mission & program related investment Support and enable intermediaries, including CDFIs Mobilise local government Encourage reorientation eg OMB memo Improve & evolve procurement & commissioning with focus on outcomes & quality Extend entrepreneurship support to social entrepreneurs Develop international development investment strategy Guidance for funding and financing tools for social policy Centralised expert hub for impact investment Outcomes based commissioning Guidance for fiduciaries Promote CDFIs and product Cross agency & intergovernmental support & secondments Incentivise State and Local government action Improve metrics to support mainstream adoption Remove barriers; enhance supporting regulation, guidance Expand reach of programmes to boost impact Review & simplify regulation to promote enterprise and intermediation Review constraints on deployment of philanthropic capital Focus data and metrics on outcomes & impact Review and publish existing costs for social issues and what they measure Increase disclosure requirements for institutions to include positive screening Conduct study of efficient, targeted tax incentives to promote impact investment Review barriers to entry for CDFIs Refresh guidance for fiduciaries and trustees Support , create, and systematise metrics and measures Share evidence and lessons where results based funding is already utilised Lead by example with open data sharing and transparency Build ecosystem & impact enterprise capacity Educate and increase capacity from policy makers, public service, community sector and investors Develop model budget treatments and agreements for social impact bonds and impact funds Enable platforms for expertise, excellence and evidence Use “bully pulpit” to good effect Reward policy entrepreneurs Create a central contact point in government Starter Questions Views on aspirational market sizing and timeframe current “top down” analysis ~$3 billion cumulative assets What are your top picks in aspirational goals across the three areas of mobilising capital, product development and stimulating deal flow Other key levers that should be highlighted Views on target size for a social impact fund/wholesale funder Working group membership – where are you most interested to participate and suggestions for additional membership Appendices: Context Impact Investment in Australia overview Strengths & levers Challenges Potential market Size Where Growth may come from Potential Investment Pools Impact Investing in Australia: Overview Impact investing is occurring and gaining interest and attention Rising awareness and activity across sectors, though not clearly led from either government or market Transactions demonstrate innovation, impact, diversity, and some scale; examples across market segments Government action has been limited, but important; current policy interest driven from the States. Capability, including collaboration and brokering new generation public private partnerships needs building Market still in early stages of marketplace building Significant potential, including beyond domestic market and strong foundations to build on Imperative to translate interest to action & fragmented activity to more coherent practice Impact Investing in Australia: Levers & Strengths Supply Capital Availability of funds not a constraint, incl. long term savings pool governed by fiduciaries; institutions strong & economically significant Credit enhancement Early products provide strong examples of credit enhancement & risk reduction strategies Demand Product development & innovation capability & Australian examples scalable in design Significant latent demand socially oriented organisations and communities will need range of financing options to support their work Ecosystem Intermediaries History of community and cooperative enterprise Field growing Early adopters have track record and have attracted investment Prudential system & regulation strong Government & policy directed to impact investment has been catalytic Other fields provide strong precedents eg infrastructure Leadership Measurement Data strength in government and related institutions such as Productivity Commission Focus through not for profit reform and early deals on developing impact metrics Talent pipeline building to develop the sector and return with international experience Network strengths strong personal networks backbone of leadership in Australia Source: IMPACT – Australia field work 2012 & Impact Investing Australia stakeholder survey 2014 Impact Investing in Australia: Challenges Supply Barriers to entry Lack of available products and high transaction costs Risk-return Insufficient information and understanding of risk and return for products is a barrier to take-up Demand Product development not yet delivering spectrum of quality investable propositions Capacity building for entrepreneurs and nonprofits to make ideas and initiatives investable is lacking Intermediaries More and better intermediation with scale, depth, diversity and reach needed Aggregation and/or clearing capacity required to reduce inefficiencies and improve economies of scale Ecosystem Education Awareness of context, track record, potential, and practical entry points, remains low Policy focus and targeted initiatives to catalyse the market, remove barriers and encourage participation lacking Measurement Measurement systems allowing comparisons between investments, is lacking Benchmarking data required to enable investors to source and make useful comparisons on completed or prospective transactions Leadership Leadership required to develop beyond disparate activities and personal networks, into critical mass Capability Attracting talented people requires entry points, skill enhancement and career path Source: IMPACT – Australia field work 2012 & Impact Investing Australia stakeholder survey 2014 Sizing Market Potential 2018 Limited bottom up data, hence estimates made top down Estimates based on US and UK market growth rates (assuming lag of ~two years) and accounting for relative size of capital and charity markets, as well as projected impact investment growth Tested against what potential sources of capital would need to be mobilised over that period and sources from it could reasonably be expected to come in the Australian market By 2018: cumulative total of ~>A$3 billion, new annual impact investments of ~A$500 million Estimated potential for cumulative impact assets 2018 ~>A$3 billion Source: IMPACT – Australia Appendix 4, and analysis courtesy John Mcleod 2014 Impact Investment in Australia: Where Will Growth Come From A number of social issues stand out for scale of need and spending Disability A$6.9 billion (2011-12) Aged Care A$12.9 billion (2011-12) Affordable Housing Unemployment A$6.1 billion (2010-11) A$3.9 billion (2011-12) Health & Hospitals A$97.8 billion (2011-12) Early Childhood A$5 billion (2011-12) Source: Review of Government Services 2014, Australian Institute for Health and Welfare Indigenous programs A$3.5 billion (2011-12) Impact Investment in Australia: Where Will Growth Come From New Market Opportunities Disadvantage has a postcode in Australia with persistent & concentrated joblessness Australian communities need infrastructure, economic dynamism & jobs That includes soft infrastructure of shared services & infrastructure for human capital, the engine of productivity Social Sector Finance Significant budget changes and structural adjustment means changing needs A$8.8 billion of capital investments (2006-07) 61% funded from operating surplus Potential for bond market or other aggregation Outcomes Based Contracting Government outsourced ~>A$25 billion to the social sector (2007; new data due 2014) Little currently oriented to outcomes Growing interest in Social Impact Bonds Focus on Place & Community Infrastructure @ 1% of (2007) outsourced funding potential ~A$250 million; at 10% ~A$2.5 billion Impact Investment in Australia: Where Will Growth Come From Philanthropic sources Private Ancillary Funds Public Ancillary Funds Corporate foundations Other trusts and foundations HNWI Superannuation trustees Member based funds Social purpose organisations Large NFP Smaller Commercial funds innovative NFP Faith based funds Social enterprise Community enterprise Fund managers Institutional fund managers Insurance funds Social investment funds Property trusts Churches Ethical funds Communities Responsible investment funds