Migrant Classifications 2011 University of Chicago Center for International Studies Push-Pull Factors Push/Pull Factors: “Push” factors are things that drive people AWAY from a place, while “Pull” factors are things that DRAW people IN to a place Can you see any potential trouble in explaining migration solely in these terms? Scholars say the “Push/Pull” model… …is too general. It could be just about anything--economic, social, political--that could be a factor. Does this tell us anything useful? …it suggests that humans neatly fall into either the “push” or “pull” category, when reality is much more complicated. …it suggests that humans are strictly extrinsically motivated (moved by something outside themselves) to migrate, which may not always be the case Adapted from Virginia Parks presentation, “Economic Effects of Immigration: Lessons from the Chicago Labor Market” at the 2011 University of Chicago Summer Teacher Institute, Migration: Causes and Consequences Theories of Migration In order to understand migration, we need more complicated and detailed theories of WHY people move. These are a few: Neoclassical Economic Theory Dual Labor Market Theory World Systems Theory Adapted from Virginia Parks presentation, “Economic Effects of Immigration: Lessons from the Chicago Labor Market” at the 2011 University of Chicago Summer Teacher Institute, Migration: Causes and Consequences Theories of Migration Neoclassical Economic Theory: Show me the money! • It’s all about supply and demand! • The belief that migration flows from low-wage to high-wage markets • People make decisions to move based on this question: • Where will I get the best return on my skills? • Any problems here??? Adapted from Virginia Parks presentation, “Economic Effects of Immigration: Lessons from the Chicago Labor Market” at the 2011 University of Chicago Summer Teacher Institute, Migration: Causes and Consequences Theories of Migration Dual Labor Market Theory • It’s all about JOBS • Segmented labor market • Primary: stable jobs, good pay, opportunities for advancement, recognized social status • Secondary: unstable, low pay, no or limited opportunities to advance (regardless of skill), low social status • Natives shun jobs in secondary sector • Immigrants needed as labor supply into secondary sector jobs. There will always be a need for migrants! • Any problems here? Adapted from Virginia Parks presentation, “Economic Effects of Immigration: Lessons from the Chicago Labor Market” at CIS Institute Theories of Migration World Systems Theory: • It’s all about globalization! • Positions migration within global economic system • In drive for higher profits, companies enter poor countries for cheap land, raw materials, and labor • Entry disrupts internal socioeconomic systems • Forces of globalization hasten penetration • Transportation & communications technology • Cultural homogenization • Still…is this a perfect explanation??? Adapted from Virginia Parks presentation, “Economic Effects of Immigration: Lessons from the Chicago Labor Market” at CIS Institute The Amenities Model--is it all about preference and entertainment? How Amenities Drive Urban Development, from TN Clark, ed., The City as an Entertainment Machine Pros and Cons of this model? Adapted from Terry Nichols Clark presentation at at the 2011 University of Chicago Summer Teacher Institute, Migration: Causes and Consequences Which theory do you think best fits most Americans? Neo-Classical (go where the jobs are) Dual Labor Market (natives will seek better jobs and leave immigrants to take what is left) World Systems Theory (people are moving with global business) Amenities Model (people move for economic reasons, but also personal preference as well) Contrary to popular perception, the poorest of the poor typically do not migrate Emigration rate by level of human development Low human development 3.7 (e.g., D.R. of Congo to Cote d’Ivoire) Medium human development 4.5 (e.g., Myanmar to Gabon) High human development 9.0 (e.g., Cuba to Bahrain) Very high human development 5.5 (e.g., Barbados to Lichtenstein) To developed countries To developing countries Source: Aaron Terrazas’s presentation at the 2011 University of Chicago Summer Teacher Institute, Migration: Causes and Consequences Note: The Human Development Index (HDI) is a composite measure of individual wellbeing in a country that takes into consideration life expectancy, adult literacy rates, education enrollment, and per capita Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Source: United Nations Development Program (UNDP) calculations based on data from “Global Migrant Origin Database (Version 4),” Development Research Center on Migration, Globalization and Poverty, University of Sussex. Refugees and IDP’s-migrants without choice A refugee is someone who owing to a well founded fear of persecution for reasons of political opinion, race, religion, nationality or membership in a particular social group are outside their country of nationality and are unable or, as a result of such fear, unwilling to return to it ... An asylum seeker is someone who is seeking refugee status This definition is not always good enough, in that it does not cover victims of natural disasters An Internally Displaced Person (IDP) is essentially a refugee inside their own country. Ex: A certain city is unsafe for a certain religion, so those citizens Source: Anwen Tormey’s persentation at the 2011 move elsewhere within the same University of Chicago Summer Teacher Institute, Migration: Causes and Consequences country.