According to Supervisors. .
Take too long to write.
People only want good news.
It’s about “Show me the money!”
Don’t improve performance.
Employees say. . .
Never get one or it’s late.
All checkmarks and no examples.
No guidance about what to do differently.
No link between performance and pay.
Why Write Performance Reviews?
• Opportunity for formal written feedback and dialogue about
development.
• Emphasize a “performance” culture.
• Reinforce expectations & recognize achievement of them.
• Generate documentation and a record (+ and -).
• Justification for employment decisions.
Performance reviews should clarify:
What is expected of me?
Why is it important?
How am I doing?
Performance Management
Continuous interaction
Part of the ongoing “routine”
Ongoing development
Observations with feedback for small incremental changes
“Real-time” here-and-now orientation
COACHING
Performance Review
Singular meeting (2x’s/yr)
“Dedicated” time
Development “plan”
Summarizes results against expectations
Documentation of past events
EVALUATION
Contrast/Comparison
Central Tendency
Familiarity/Similarity
Halo/Horns Effect
Recency
Length of Service
Prior Reviews
Keep a record of examples & samples.
Note successes and lessons learned.
Document as events occur.
Note dates, times, objective measures.
Include important items, not every routine action.
“Deliberative” notes & samples.
Copy & paste: emails, portions of electronic documents, sample work.
You have the opportunity to influence your review by what you choose to write and how you write it!
Provide specific examples or quantitative, measurable information to demonstrate progress compared to a target.
Give more examples of important information as evidence for a very high (Top) rating or for a very low
(Requires Improvement) rating.
Use different examples for each goal/ expectation/competency.
Keep your comments descriptive and succinct. (Focus on facts & measures. No generalities, labeling or personality traits.)
Use correct grammar, punctuation, spelling. OR, a bulleted list of accomplishments if there are several instead of a narrative paragraph.
Objective quality-quantity-date information that directly supports the level of attainment.
Description of specific related activities; references to a work sample, project, incident.
Specific examples that show obvious connection to each competency.
Incorporate phrases from Appraisal Wizard along with a specific incident involving you.
General summary regarding the level of performance.
Reiteration of key positive highlights/ progress achieved.
“This young lady has delusions of adequacy.”
“Works well when under constant supervision and cornered like a rat in a trap.”
“He brings a lot of joy whenever he leaves the room.”
“Got a full six-pack but lacks the plastic thing to hold it all together.”
Opinion or Vague
-Self-
I am organized and efficient in performing my daily tasks in a timely manner.
Fact (Specific)
-Self-
Utilize a “5 Top Priorities” list to plan my daily tasks and accomplished all assignments on or before requested deadlines.
Reorganized electronic folders in June 2010 by project areas to enable faster retrieval.
Improved quality & satisfaction of learning programs in 2010.
Increased 2009 program fillrate to 95% vs. avg of 67% in
2008. Overall rating average of 9.7 vs. 8.3 during same time.
Supervisor Comment
Disorganized and does not multi-task well.
Supervisor Specific Comment
Filing items by project name and on department drive will enable faster retrieval/updates by Pat & others despite phone/people interruptions
.
Negative Tone
-Supervisor-
Fails to follow customer request instructions which causes customer problems.
Instructive Tone
-Supervisor-
Needs to read all information on request form & obtain customer confirmation of plan before executing event details.
Rater Bias
-Self-
“Received excellent patron feedback on
Fall performance series. ( Recency)
Specific Examples
-Self-
Consistently increased patron satisfaction ratings from Winter (7.2) to Spring (7.9) to Fall (9.1) by implementing patron suggestions noted on evaluations.
TOP
Exceeds expectations in most aspects of the job frequently.
Goes above and beyond what is asked.
Thinks ahead. Is proactive. Seeks improvement.
Solves problems independently.
VALUED
Meets expectations in all major aspects of the position and exceeds some.
Sometimes goes beyond what is asked.
Takes initiative to solve problems.
Seeks learning and improvement.
DEVELOPING
New to the position or some duties are new.
More training/learning is needed to be fully performing all aspects of the job at the desired level.
Performance does not meet expectations for fully experienced person.
DEVELOPING
New to the position or some duties are new.
People rarely remember what they are told.
What they remember usually wrong.
WRITTEN COMMENT Sections
Strengths: Describe TWO things they do well.
Development Areas: Name ONE area they need to improve and ONE item they need to learn or develop further.
Action Steps: Describe ONE to THREE specific actions they need to take to achieve the next level of performance.
Overall Comments: Describe their value to the organization