Defence and Security Procurement Directive: Remedies London 8 June 2011 Dr. Aris GEORGOPOULOS Head of Research Unit on Defence and Strategic Procurement, PPRG Law School, University of Nottingham Outline - EU Institutional/Constitutional Context - Enforcement - Issues arising - Conclusions Aris Georgopoulos THE EUROPEAN UNION 1st Pillar Internal Market 2nd Pillar CFSP CSDP 3rd Pillar EU Institutional/Constitutional Context • This differentiation in the intensity of integration refers primarily to the following: a) Decision making process- instruments b) Role of the European Commission c) Adjudication role of the Court of Justice of the EU d) Role of the European Parliament • Accordingly: - Internal Market -> high degree of intensity of integration (supranational) - CFSP/CSDP -> lower intensity, limited role for Commission, CJEU, Parliament (intergovernmental) Aris Georgopoulos Defence Procurement Offsets (defence) Offsets THE EUROPEAN UNION (civilian) 1st Pillar Internal Market 2nd Pillar CFSP CSDP 3rd Pillar Code of Conduct Defence Procurement (EDA) Defence Procurement Directive THE EUROPEAN UNION 1st Pillar Internal Market Guidance on Offsets??? 2nd Pillar 3rd Pillar CFSP CSDP Code of Conduct on Offsets (EDA) Enforcement EU Level: - Commission or MS instituted Proceedings before CJEU - Corrective Mechanism (Art. 63 Dir) Aris Georgopoulos Enforcement National Level: - Administrative Remedies: If MS require contractor to seek review from CA first → must provide automatic suspension of possibility to conclude the contract (Art 55 (6) Dir) Aris Georgopoulos Enforcement National Level: - Legal remedies/mechanisms: Interim Relief and other measures (Art 56 Dir) Set aside (Art 56 Dir) Damages (Art 56 Dir) Aris Georgopoulos Enforcement National Level: - Legal remedies/mechanisms: Stand still period (Art 57 Dir) Ineffectiveness (Art.60 Dir) Alternative Penalties (Art. 61 Dir) Aris Georgopoulos Issues arising - Can MSs limit the availability of these remedies only to EU based economic operators? - Can these remedies provide adequate enforcement? - Can national Courts review the use of Article 346 TFEU? Aris Georgopoulos Conclusions - Remedies in defence and security procurement are meant to provide the “teeth” of the new regime. - The new framework uses the complete panoply of the acquis in the area of procurement remedies - Its success will depend upon: a) The willingness of contractors to use these remedies (Country specific at least at the beginning) b) Separation of powers and judicial activism – Country specific (see Germany) Aris Georgopoulos Thank You Dr Aris GEORGOPOULOS School of Law University of Nottingham Public Procurement Research Group Nottingham NG7 2RD UK Email: aris.georgopoulos@nottingham.ac.uk Webpage: http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/Law/Staff-Lookup/aris.georgopoulos PPRG/DSPUnit: http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/pprg/units/defstratprocurement.aspx