DEVELOPMENT OF A MONITORING AND EVALUATION SYSYEM TO SUPPORT POVERTY REDUCTION AND GROWTH IN VIETNAM Contents The importance of M&E in Vietnam & M&E initiatives The National ODA monitoring system & monitoting tools to support Proposed project rating system Capacity building for M&E Linking on ground activities and national system Vietnam MPI M&E is important in Vietnam Decree on ODA management has an M&E chapter Hanoi Core Statement Localisation of Paris Declaration Specific commitments on harmonising M&E Pilot National M&E System 3 Functions and procedures for M&E PMU, line agencies and national agencies Efforts to developed the M&E system made from 1998 Expect to institutionalise harmonised system during 2006 Vietnam MPI 4 M&E initiatives in Vietnam Hanoi Core Statement National monitoring & reporting system Measuring progress of national objectives 5 year socio-economic development plan 2006-2010 Comprehensive Poverty Reduction & Growth Strategy Partnership evaluations Experience with Government of Japan Using evaluation results for investment formulation Vietnam MPI Hanoi Core Statement Commitments from Government & donors: Harmonisation Action Plan Annual work plan including: Alignment to Government policy & systems Harmonisation and simplification Management for development results Mutual accountability Use of common results frameworks Aligned reporting and monitoring formats 13 verifiable indicators reported annually Baseline survey completed for all indicators Vietnam MPI Effectiveness and efficiency of national M&E system National ODA monitoring system - history First national portfolio monitoring report using aligned format Institutionalise aligned format Refine IT tools, guidelines & definitions to support aligned format Commence using aligned format Refine format and align GoV and donor systems Detailed review of pilot monitoring system National data flows begin from monitoring system Refine institutional arrangements for monitoring practice Pilot use of monitoring system: 6 Ministries & 7 Provinces Extensive training of monitoring practitioners Format revised, definitions agreed, IT tools developed to support use Draft format developed and trialed with 6 loan projects GoV and 5 Banks form partnership for reporting formats Q1 Q2 Q3 2004 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 2005 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 2006 Q4 Vietnam MPI National ODA monitoring system Partnership with 5 Banks (80% ODA) Harmonised format to reduce transaction costs IT tools developed to support use Trialled for 4 quarters (>20 projects) Refined to align GoV and donor needs Will be legalised in 2006 Reduces transaction costs for managers Data consistency for increased analysis Data consistency enables benchmarking Vietnam MPI National ODA monitoring system - logic •ODA-MIS •Aligned Monitoring Tool (AMT) •National benchmarking indicators – process •Sectoral benchmarking indicators - progress •Portfolio Monitoring Tool (PMT) •Portfolio and contract review tools •National M&E Manual and Website •National M&E Resource Centre National Agencies Feedback & Benchmarking Quarterly Portfolio Analysis Line Agency Donor Quarterly Portfolio Analysis Line Agency •Aligned Monitoring Tool (AMT) •Portfolio Monitoring Tool (PMT) •Sectoral benchmarking indicators - progress •Portfolio and contract review tools •National M&E Manual and Website Line Agency Donor Feedback & Benchmarking Quarterly Progress PMU PMU Quarterly Progress PMU PMU Quarterly Progress PMU PMU Quarterly Progress PMU PMU •Aligned Monitoring framework •Definitions and procedures to support framework •Aligned Monitoring Tool (AMT) •Methods and tools in Manual progress monitoring •National M&E Manual and Website Vietnam MPI Effectiveness and efficiency of national M&E system National ODA monitoring system - future Monitoring supports management for development results Institutionalised feedback & benchmarking Profession of M&E practitioners in Vietnam National data flows from monitoring system Demand for monitoring data to support management Tools support use of institutionalised format GoV and donors agree common set of outcome indicators GoV and Donor data needs aligned in institutionalised format 2006 2008 2010 Vietnam MPI AMT – Aligned Monitoring Tool Compiles monitoring data from PMU quarterly Compares actual and plan Tracks disbursement Tracks procurement Tracks activity outputs Tracks safeguards Enables variance from plan analysis Supports project management Automatic rating system Vietnam MPI Monitor 3 types of change Disbursement Variance between actual and planned rate of disbursement Process Variance between actual and planned time taken to complete required processes for bidding, contract implementation, resettlement and environmental management Performance Variance between actual and planned implementation of activities and achievement of outputs Vietnam MPI PMT - Extracts data from the AMT Disbursement sheets (disbursement rate) ODA Stakeholders Portfolio Monitoring Tool Procurement, resettlement and environmental issues sheets (process monitoring) Portfolio analysis, sectoral analysis and benchmarking Activity sheet (performance monitoring) Aligned Monitoring Reports PMU 1 PMU 2 PMU 3 PMU 4 Vietnam MPI ODA-MIS – acts as M&E archive New, user friendly version Data on all ODA projects Data on all phases of project cycle Allows benchmarking by: Sector Line agency Donor Centrally located in FERD Other line agencies will be able to access online Vietnam MPI Health Rating – the Project Project Indicators Disbursement Bidding Efficiency Activity Efficiency Contract Payments Resettlement Efficiency Resettlement Achievement Rate Environmental Management Efficiency Performance Indicators Vietnam MPI Project Rating System Project Rating - Frequency Distribution - All Projects in Portfolio 7 6 No. of Projects 5 Disbursement 4 Procurement Safeguards 3 Physical Progress 2 1 0 Unsatisfactory Partly Unsatisfactory Partly Satisfactory Satisfactory Highly Satisfactory Continuous process Compare projects Identify poor performing projects Target efforts to improve them Identify good performance and learn lessons Rating Scale Vietnam MPI Rating System – Guiding Principles Project Rating - All Projects In Portfolio 35 Indicators that can be compared within and between portfolios 30 Rating 25 Physical Progress 20 Benchmarking indicators Safeguards Procurement 15 Disbursement 10 5 0 Project 1 Project 2 Project 3 Project 4 Project 5 Max Possibile Score Collect data once Use data from the AMT Project Name Overall Project Rating - Frequency Distribution - By Sector 7 6 Avoid complex indicators 5 No. of Projects Simple and believable Health 4 Transport Rural Development 3 Education 2 1 0 Unsatisfactory Partly Unsatisfactory Partly Satisfactory Satisfactory Highly Satisfactory Quality Assurance Cross-checking data to make sure its reliable Rating Scale Vietnam MPI Capacity building for M&E Creat a champion network for M&E since 2005 Select champions for M&E from ministries and provinces Two types of champions: Management level Practitional level Conduct Training of trainers Regular meetings Use champions to expand the M&E system at ministries and provinces Resources: M&E manual M&E website Resource centre Vietnam MPI Linking on ground activities and national system – an example Vietnam MPI Thank you for your attention Mrs. Nguyen Linh Chi linhchi.vamesp@vnn.vn