Water, Sanitation and Hygiene Advocacy and Communication Strategy Framework 2012-17 Key WASH behaviours addressed by the Strategy – based on available evidence • Building and use of toilets • The safe disposal of child faeces • Handwashing with soap after defecation, before preparing and eating food, and after handling child faeces • Safe storage and handling of drinking water Strategy focus Immediate objective is to raise awareness and change existing perceptions about the importance of sanitation and hygiene practices, The long term objective is to change social norms making open defecation unacceptable and promoting the practice of safe disposal of child faeces, handwashing with soap and safe storage and handling of drinking water among all. Promoting Individual Behaviour Change Knowledge CHANGE Focus on change at different levels Multiple dimensions influence individual behaviour as depicted in the figure below Interpersonal factors, socio- cultural and policy environments all influence sanitation and hygiene behaviours STRUCTURAL ENVIRONMENT Infrastructure, economic barriers PUBLIC POLICY National, state, local laws INSTITUTIONAL Staff capacities, resources, mandate SOCIO-CULTURAL Community norms and social networks INTERPERSONAL Family & friends INDIVIDUAL Knowledge, attitudes, skills, practices C4D - ICO The Core of the Communication Strategy Audiences’ Knowledge/ Perceptions Needs, challenges, problems, opportunities Info-Com Systems Baseline & other studies Communication Objectives Primary & Secondary Audiences Activities Communication Approaches Messages/ Themes/Media Communication Objectives To raise mass awareness make the identified audiences more conscious about issues related to the importance of sanitation and hygiene To influence decision makers and opinion leaders to advocate for improved sanitation and hygiene standards Ensure that households have knowledge of the linkages between sanitation, hygiene and health leading to increase public demand for quality sanitation services and adoption of hygiene practices. Three phases of the communication strategy PHASE 1 Awareness raising PHASE 2 Advocacy PHASE 3 Social and Behaviour Change • Raise visibility of the importance of good sanitation and hygiene behaviours. Increase awareness on the risks and implications of open defecation • To provide influencers and decision makers with the information they need, encourage them to speak up take action for positive change. Get Support & create an enabling environment for change • To empower individuals and families to make decisions based on correct information , Stigmatize risky practices, promote healthy norms and practices Is knowledge enough to change? • Knowledge, when packaged in messages, must have an effective appeal to promote the intended change, such as • Love • Reward (e.g. economic) • Social recognition/compliance • Fear • Disgust Audience? Action? Why do it? The Problem/Solution Tree for getting more income Not being able to work Being Sick Having to pay for medications Having to attend sick children Etc. Not knowing what to do Magazine ads Champions – Social emulation/pressure Looking at Smoking from the Audience’s Point of View Allure of smoking •Brand identity (cool, hip) •Independence (rebellion) •Individuality •Nicotine high •Relieves stress Allure of non-smoking •Healthy (no sicknesses, no wrinkles) • Makes feel some adults proud as they provide a good example DISGUST In addition to knowledge, behaviour change happens through IPC and social pressure • Dialogue, counseling and open forum discussion are best methods to empower and internalize the need for change • Social pressure is also key to promote change How do new ideas spread ? The diffusion of Innovation Theory Innovators 2% Early Adopters 14% Early Majority 34% Late Majority 34% Late Adopters 10% Resistors 6% Individuals and peers groups can effectively influence others groups and draw them in to be more open to new ideas, as their peers have already modeled before them. Production Mode v. Strategic Mode IEC Production Social Behaviour Change Comm. Key focus Production of communication Research, evidence-based materials based on technical strategy, audience-focused, solutions media mix, participatory approaches Comm. Mode One-way (monologic) Mix of one-way and two-way (dialogic) Advantages Easy and quick to produce Higher impact and higher degree of sustainability Disadvantages Of little effectiveness, unless Require a longer process (but carefully researched, planned achieve better results) and integrated A common fallacy when developing the communication strategy THE WRONG WAY THE BETTER WAY Deciding the solution and developing the strategy based solely on WHAT is happening; e.g. Open defecation (how many and who) → Latrines (how many and for whom) Focusing on the causes of WHY it is happening (reasons, perceptions) and/or WHY the solution is not being adopted (with plus and minus) In any case, stakeholders’ participation and engagement is what can prevent many of the problems experienced in such instances Implementation framework • A detailed implementation framework has been developed based on the three identified phases • It lists out the primary and secondary stakeholders, the activities to be used with each of them and the inputs required The implementation framework provides guidance for states to develop state-specific action plans for rolling out of the strategy. A district communication plan template has been developed. Evidence of effectiveness in longitudinal studies shows: Isolated interventions, focused on behavior change at individual level are not sufficiently effective in the long run The most effective is: A wide range of interventions at different levels, for a sufficient time and according to the needs of states/districts and communities Monitoring and evaluation framework (to be planned from the start) M &E framework has been developed with indicators for all the three phases. The indicators are organized at three levelsOutcome Indicators To assess the effectiveness of the strategy in meeting the stated objective. These are defined by behavioural results, policy changes or changes in social norms specified from the very outset Output Indicators Refers to milestones/intermediate results of the communication interventions Process Indicators Used to assess how well the communication plan is being implemented and to adjust the activities to meet the objectives Thank you