ISM-2013-Predictive-Analytics-for-Program

advertisement

EVIDENCE BASED

PROGRAM INTEGRITY

CAPS | PREDICTIVE ANALYTICS FOR PROGRAM INTEGRITY | CAPS.UA.EDU

WHO ARE WE?

CAPS | PREDICTIVE ANALYTICS FOR PROGRAM INTEGRITY | CAPS.UA.EDU

CAPS | PREDICTIVE ANALYTICS FOR PROGRAM INTEGRITY | CAPS.UA.EDU

WHAT WE DO

MyDHR

Online Citizen Access Portal for Alabama Food Assistance

Program

RISE

Case management system for the

Alabama Office of Radiation Control

CAPS Builder

Custom business rules engine and workflow builder and manager

CAPS | PREDICTIVE ANALYTICS FOR PROGRAM INTEGRITY | CAPS.UA.EDU

A FEW OF OUR CLIENTS

CAPS | PREDICTIVE ANALYTICS FOR PROGRAM INTEGRITY | CAPS.UA.EDU

CAPS | PREDICTIVE ANALYTICS FOR PROGRAM INTEGRITY | CAPS.UA.EDU

WHAT’S THE

PROBLEM?

CAPS | PREDICTIVE ANALYTICS FOR PROGRAM INTEGRITY | CAPS.UA.EDU

TRACK RECORD OF INTEGRITY

96% accuracy rate in benefit payments. Considerably higher than most major benefit programs.

96% 4%

20% payment errors are actually due to underpayment .

CAPS | PREDICTIVE ANALYTICS FOR PROGRAM INTEGRITY | CAPS.UA.EDU

WHAT’S THE PROBLEM?

OVERPAYMENT

$117 MILLION / MONTH

IN OVERPAYMENT OF

BENEFITS IN THE US

MEALS

ENOUGH TO FEED

135,252 FAMILIES OF 4

FOR AN ENTIRE MONTH

SAVINGS

POTENTIAL SAVINGS

OF $1.4 BILLION / YEAR

NATIONWIDE

MEALS

ENOUGH TO PROVIDE

592 MILLION MEALS

CAPS | PREDICTIVE ANALYTICS FOR PROGRAM INTEGRITY | CAPS.UA.EDU

CAPS | PREDICTIVE ANALYTICS FOR PROGRAM INTEGRITY | CAPS.UA.EDU

WHAT DOES IT

LOOK LIKE?

CAPS | PREDICTIVE ANALYTICS FOR PROGRAM INTEGRITY | CAPS.UA.EDU

01.

DIVERSITY OF DATA

Don’t rely on a single source of data

This system pulls data from multiple sources such as the US Census and state

FNS records.

Ensure data is easy to add

New data can be added to the system through a powerful user interface. This creates a system that prevents stagnation through frequent updates.

CAPS | PREDICTIVE ANALYTICS FOR PROGRAM INTEGRITY | CAPS.UA.EDU

MANY MORE

US CENSUS

ALDHR FNS

CAPS | PREDICTIVE ANALYTICS FOR PROGRAM INTEGRITY | CAPS.UA.EDU

02.

EMPOWER, DON’T REPLACE

Value the experience of your users

The system should display data in a way that allows users to “follow their hunches”. The system should support, not replace the user.

Capture user feedback to improve prediction

As users interact with the system, capture their input and use it to improve analysis over time.

CAPS | PREDICTIVE ANALYTICS FOR PROGRAM INTEGRITY | CAPS.UA.EDU

CAPS | PREDICTIVE ANALYTICS FOR PROGRAM INTEGRITY | CAPS.UA.EDU

03.

BE FLEXIBLE

The world changes at a rapid pace

The system should provide tools to implement changes in an efficient manner. The more high-level the interface the better, you should limit the involvement of “super hero programmers” when possible.

Embrace the diversity of your users

People interact with the world in many ways. Don’t force a user to use your system through a single view. Instead, allow many different means of exploring the system.

CAPS | PREDICTIVE ANALYTICS FOR PROGRAM INTEGRITY | CAPS.UA.EDU

CAPS | PREDICTIVE ANALYTICS FOR PROGRAM INTEGRITY | CAPS.UA.EDU

04.

PROVIDE GUIDANCE

Don’t assume users are data scientists

Guide users to making good decisions on how they visualize and interact with the data. Just because they can do it, doesn’t mean they should.

CAPS | PREDICTIVE ANALYTICS FOR PROGRAM INTEGRITY | CAPS.UA.EDU

CAPS | PREDICTIVE ANALYTICS FOR PROGRAM INTEGRITY | CAPS.UA.EDU

05.

BE APPROACHABLE

Use concepts familiar to users

Use interface design elements, terminology and functionality that is familiar to the end users. Avoid complex jargon when designing the system.

Spend significant effort on user experience

The most accurate predictive system in the world is useless unless people use it. Special effort should be spent on improving the “everyday” user’s experience.

CAPS | PREDICTIVE ANALYTICS FOR PROGRAM INTEGRITY | CAPS.UA.EDU

CAPS | PREDICTIVE ANALYTICS FOR PROGRAM INTEGRITY | CAPS.UA.EDU

06.

ANOMALY OVER FRAUD

Fraud implies negative intent

While it is imperative that data is monitored for invalid and fraudulent activity, looking for what is different versus what is bad allows the system to identify issues that can provide value in improving society.

Identify and communicate subtle differences

As transactions and data change based on a variety of factors, ensure system users are alerted in a timely manner.

Food Assistance Applications in Mobile County, 2013

600

500

400

300

ANOMALY CAUSED BY OIL SPILL

200

100

0

White

Black

Asian

CAPS | PREDICTIVE ANALYTICS FOR PROGRAM INTEGRITY | CAPS.UA.EDU

Keep the

“human in the loop”

Combine analysis with prevention

Look for anomalies, not fraud”

Make it flexible, approachable and sustainable

CAPS | PREDICTIVE ANALYTICS FOR PROGRAM INTEGRITY | CAPS.UA.EDU

@UACAPS

UACAPS caps.ua.edu

205-348-6835 csims@cs.ua.edu

CAPS | PREDICTIVE ANALYTICS FOR PROGRAM INTEGRITY | CAPS.UA.EDU

Download