Learning Styles: Does the Shotgun Approach Work? Dean Farwood, MS, MCT Heald College, Program in Information Technology Keller Graduate School of Management, College of Engineering and Information Sciences Why I’m Completely Unqualified to Present This Topic I was a C and D student throughout grammar school I didn’t go to high school I dropped out of a music conservatory after two years I studied chess for a year I didn’t start teaching until I was in my mid-thirties Why I’m Perfectly Qualified to Present This Topic I was a C and D student throughout grammar school I didn’t go to high school Since age 14 I’ve only studied subjects in which I’m interested I have completed graduate training in three fields (physical therapy, systems engineering, education) I didn’t start teaching until I was in my early-thirties I teach in both a two-year vocational program and a master’s program for managers Terminology Learning Style The way in which a student, “…concentrates on, processes, internalizes, and remembers new and difficult academic information or skills...” (Shaughnessy). Terminology Learning Styles Competitive Collaborative Avoidant Participant Dependent Independent (Grasha) Terminology Learning Styles (Dunn) Environmental sound, temperature, light, design Emotional persistence, motivation, responsibility Sociological teams, pairs, solo Physical perception, mobility, time, intake (food) Psychological analytical/global, reflective/impulsive Terminology Learning Styles (Kolb) Learning Style Inventory Learning Modes: Concrete Experience Reflective Observation Abstract Conceptualization Active Experimentation Kolb’s Bipolar Scales Kolb’s Bipolar Scales Kolb’s Bipolar Scales Kolb’s Bipolar Scales Kolb’s Bipolar Scales Kolb’s Bipolar Scales Kolb’s Bipolar Scales Kolb’s Bipolar Scales Kolb’s Bipolar Scales Kolb’s Bipolar Scales Kolb’s Bipolar Scales Kolb’s Bipolar Scales Kolb’s Bipolar Scales Kolb’s Bipolar Scales Kolb’s Bipolar Scales Kolb’s Bipolar Scales Putting Them Into Action Terry (2001) - Translating learning style theory into university teaching practices Assimilators should receive advanced, detailed information on upcoming exams Divergers should be given frequent writing assignments Convergers should be tested on practical application of material learned Terminology Student Learning Outcomes Objective measures of student performance such as: course-specific assessments measurement of course instructional objective attainment (formative, summative) final course grades standardized tests Terminology Active vs. Passive Learning Active Hands-on Moving around Building Passive Lecture Reading Thinking Can learning be passive? Can teaching be passive? Terminology The Shotgun Method Varying the delivery of course content to include several instructional modalities under the assumption that different students have different preferred learning styles and, by including varied delivery methods, teachers will have accommodated the preferred learning style of most students Questions Are preferred learning style assessment tools reliable, valid and practical to implement? NO Questions Is there consensus in the identification of teaching methods which are consistent with particular learning styles? NO Questions Does the course content influence the feasibility of accommodating preferred learning styles? YES Questions Does student attainment of learning style versatility improve academic outcomes? NO Questions Is an individual’s preferred learning style subject to change over time? NO Questions Does the shotgun method work? NO Self-referential Studies Rita Dunn’s recent article: Learning-Style Responsive Approaches for Teaching Typically Performing and At-Risk Adolescents, June, 2009 50% Dunn citations 13% dissertation +20% using Dunn methods/measurements 83% self-referential The Politics of Teaching Student-centered Supports retention Student satisfaction Success (grade inflation) Decrease anxiety Learner-centered Supports retention Learning styles The Exigencies of Learning Subject-centered Emphasizes mastery of student learning outcomes Objective measures of skills through specific rubrics May require different ways organizing curriculum THE GAP Why do administrators and teachers subscribe to an approach that, despite 30 years of research, has little or no scientific basis? Possible Answers Administrators and teachers are untrained in critical thinking and critical analysis of research findings. Teaching to Weaknesses Learning style accommodation (LS) Constructivist education (C) Multiple intelligences (MI) All have been used to justify accommodating students’ behavioral and cognitive weaknesses Teaching to Weaknesses LS, C, MI all see lecture as undesirable and all avoid discussion of reading Is this making necessity a virtue? How are children prepared for education? Sesame Street is a Dangerous Neighborhood Attention span limited TV and film provide clarity in ethics and motive TV and file provide non-analytical solutions to problems News is folksy and superficial Technological communication discourages reflection and refinement What is the Teacher’s Role? Should teachers legitimize the politicians’ justifications for their unwillingness to spend money on education from cradle to employment? What is the Teacher’s Role? Or…….should teachers train students in Sustained concentration Objectivity Critical perception Critical analysis Creativity Fluency with humanistic perspectives The Continuum of Normalcy Do LS, C, and MI celebrate diversity to the point that everything is equally meaningful? Do LS, C, and MI contribute to a growing cultural wasteland where ordinal scales are banished; everything is equal – and thus, ultimately, nothing is of value? The Answer It’s the teacher, stupid. The Answer Successful outcomes are associated with a deep rather than superficial approach to learning Superficial approaches are associated with the perceptions that the workload is too high and that assessment is testing reproductive learning The Answer Deep approaches to learning are associated with the student perception that teaching is good and goals and standards are clear. The Answer It’s the teacher, stupid. Thank you