PRESENT AND FUTURE
• Total horticulture area 5.00 lakh ha.
(10.48% of its net sown area).
• Proposed total horticulture area up to
2014-15 – 5.83 lakh ha. (12.23% of its net
sown area).
• Increase in horticulture area from 2009-10
to 2014-15 – 0.83 lakh ha.
• Percentage increase from 2009-10 to
2014-15 (16.68%).
SWOT Analysis
Strength –
• Climatic condition favors growing frost resistant
crops that are supplied as off-season crops to other
states.
• Traditionally farmers, especially tribals, are
vegetable grower and collector of wild fruits that
helps in easy transfer of technology and availability
of skilled labours.
• Good network of road and rail.
• Demand-driven market at local as-well-as in other
states due to increase purchasing power of people
and rapid industrialization/urbanization in the state.
• Existing network of departmental nurseries.
• Convergence of MNREGS in the state for effective
implementation of NHM.
Weakness –
• Low and declining productivity.
• Poor exposure of farmers and staff to modern
practices.
• Open grazing practices for 8 months in the year
causing damage to crops.
• Net irrigated area is lower.
• Lack of well trained extension person in the
remote blocks.
• Lack of infrastructure for processing, value
addition and post harvest management.
• Lack of organized market/Mandis at block level.
• Lack of appropriate transport facilities.
Opportunities –
• Presence of culturable fallow land 5.13 lakh ha.
• Scope for crop diversification from traditional
paddy/coarse grain farming to horticulture.
• Huge demand for off-season crops.
• Presence of technical institutions like IGKVV, 18
- KVK, 17 - Horticulture Colleges may help in
tapping modern knowledge in the field.
• Processing of surplus produces for value
addition.
• Establishing network for organized agri-business
through PPP.
Threat –
• Excessive expansion of area without PHM
may create de-motivation among farmers.
• Absence of weather and disease forecasting
mechanism will adversely effect crop
protection.
• Excessive withdrawal of ground water will
lead to ecological imbalance.
• Excessive use of chemical fertilizers and
pesticide will cause decrease in productivity.
• Lengthy procedure to access credit facilities
from banks de-motivate the farmers.
USP of the state in term of
horticulture
• Production of off-season vegetables and fruits like
Banana – Oct planting & Nov/Dec harvesting (5000 Mt.
surplus),
Papaya – Feb planting & Nov/Dec harvesting (55,000 Mt.),
Brinjal – Jun planting & Sep/Nov harvesting (8000 Mt.),
Cauliflower - Jun planting & Sep/Nov harvesting (31,500
Mt.),
Tomato - Jun planting & Sep/Nov harvesting (2,11,000 Mt.),
Kharif Potato (2,27,00 Mt.),
Okra – Feb planting & Apr/May harvesting (3000 Mt.) and
Chili – Jun planting & Oct/Nov harvesting (8000 Mt.)
can be further strengthened and developed due to favorable
climatic condition.
• Surplus of fruits and vegetables like Cashew-nut (5000 Mt.),
Mango (55,000 Mt.), Tomato (2,00,000 Mt.) and Chili (20,000
Mt.) can be used for processing, value addition and export.
• Good network of department nurseries (111 with
production capacity of 2.50 crore plants) that can be
strengthened to produce quality planting material and
reduce the demand supply gap (50% shortfall,
especially due to TC Banana).
• Good transport network to get access to in-land
markets as-well-as exporting the products outside the
state.
• Convergence with MNREGS helps in effective
implementation of NHM through providing protection,
irrigation, maintenance etc., to the plantation crops.
• Locational advantage of sharing borders with state like
Orissa, M.P., A.P., Maharastra and Jharkhand that
have huge market demand for fruits and vegetables,
can be en-cashed as a pull factor for promotion of
horticulture.
SUPPLY CHAIN
SUPPLY CHAIN
Strategy – Key issues
•
•
•
•
•
Area, production and productivity has increased but due to
lack of PHM practices there is considerable post harvest losses
(25-40%) and ultimately reduction in net return.
Rate of area expansion may reduce due to problems in input
supply like irrigation facilities and timely supply of quality
planting material.
No facility for proper collection and storage of surplus
produce at farm-gate level as-well-as off-farm level and
absence of organize market network from rural market to
terminal market.
Absence of forecasting facilities both in term of weather/
disease and price of products, it makes position of farmers
vulnerable and increases the risk factor.
Lack of exposure as-well-as orientation of both the farmers
and departmental staff towards modern horticulture
practices.
Strategy – Key Focus Areas
• Increasing productivity and area of horticulture.
• Reduce / minimize post harvest losses at farm-gate level.
• Strengthening and consolidating organic cultivation and
achieving organic certification.
• Developing network of cold storages and cold chain.
• Developing market infrastructure across the state, identify
target consumers through market segmentation.
• Developing new institutions like Grower Associations or
Farmers Cooperative / Society, Common Enterprise Groups
and strengthening the old ones like existing SHGs / WUAs /
Micro Credit Groups for production, processing and
marketing of the product.
Strategy – Implementation
A. Increase in crop productivity –
 Productivity is low and declining –
 Considerable gap in yield potential and average yield.
This gap can be reduce through i.
Creating assured irrigation facility –
•
•
•
•
Cost effective with in-line drip system.
Drip irrigation facility with multiple use of laterals as per crop option
through crop planning.
Exploring new and existing sources of surface water in the village like
pond, tanks etc.
De-silting and rejuvenation of existing canal systems of the state.
To achieve this goal apart from support from NHM and MIS
institutional linkage will be developed with irrigation department and
convergence with MNREGS.
Yield Potential & Gap in Horticulture Crops
in Mt.
ii.
Ensuring Plant health to ensure effective protection of
crops and efficient pest management through • Setting up of disease forecasting units (8), bio-control labs
(18) and plant health clinics (36) are required to reduce the
risk of losses from pest and diseases.
• Capacity building of farmers and staff in the field of IPM and
aggressive campaigning in support of IPM .
To achieve the goal along with inputs from NHM, institutional
linkages will be developed with agriculture universities for research
inputs, private research institutes and laboratories and KVKs for
dissemination of information.
Ensuring Soil health for knowing status of macro &
micro nutrient in the soil and their availability to the
plant through -
iii.
•
Setting up of leaf-tissue analysis lab (5) to identify the status of micro
nutrients in the plant to know the nutritional status of the crop.
•
Soil testing of all the beneficiaries and preparation of soil health card
for individual farmer. This will be helpful to identify the status of
micronutrient and their appropriate requirement in the soil, that will
help in crop planning, nutritional management and introduction of
new crops. (In Dhamtari & Janjgir-Champa district process is
complete with the help of RKVY but in NHM districts there is no
such provision).
To achieve the goal along with inputs from NHM, institutional
linkages will be developed with soil testing labs of Agriculture
department and University for soil testing and KVKs for
dissemination of information.
Trends in yield for major horticulture crops
Average Average Gains Yield potential of
yield
yield
in
Chhattisgarh
2004-05 2008-09 yield (SAU recommendation)
Sl.
No
Crops
Yield
Gap
National
average
1
Mango
7.45
3.27
-4.18
8.00
4.73
6.30
2
Litchi
2.28
1.20
-1.08
6.00
4.80
6.00
3
Lime
6.01
7.06
1.05
8.00
0.94
9.00
4
Guava
7.09
7.94
0.85
16.00
8.06
11.10
5
Banana
7.10
26.51
19.41
40.00
13.49
35.90
6
Papaya
7.09
18.37
11.28
50.00
31.63
33.40
Cashew
Custard
8
apple
Jack
9
fruit
0.42
1.67
1.25
2.00
0.33
0.80
6.96
2.97
-3.99
4.00
1.03
---
6.58
17.50
10.92
---
---
---
10
11.00
11.16
0.16
25.00
13.84
19.90
7
Potato
Average Average
yield
yield
2004-05 2008-09
Gains
in
yield
(SAU recommendation)
10.72
0.58
11.09
14.66
11.11
Sl.
No
Crops
11
Tomato
10.14
12
Brinjal
13 Cabbage
Yield potential of
Chhattisgarh
Yield
Gap
National
average
15.00
4.28
17.90
3.57
20.00
5.34
17.00
15.72
4.61
25.00
9.28
22.20
14
Cauliflower
10.60
15.00
4.40
20.00
5.00
18.10
15
Okra
9.95
8.85
-1.10
10.00
1.15
10.30
16
Onion
10.75
15.77
5.02
20.00
4.23
15.10
17
Peas
7.89
4.50
-3.39
---
---
8.20
18
Arbi
10.85
13.70
2.85
---
---
---
19
Chilli
5.74
6.00
0.26
17.50
11.50
1.60
20 Coriander
3.33
2.80
-0.53
3.00
0.20
0.60
21
13.63
7.80
-5.83
20.00
12.20
3.50
22 Turmeric
11.25
7.10
-4.15
25.00
17.90
4.60
23
7.35
4.50
-2.85
7.50
3.00
4.80
Ginger
Garlic
B. Expansion of area –
i. Shifting of focus from cultivating only high yielding
variety to –
• Introduce variety of crops with increased shelf-life and
compatible for processing.
• Increase disease resistance capacity of crops.
To achieve the goal institutional linkages will be
developed with Agriculture Universities to get research
inputs.
ii. Crop diversification by shifting from coarse grain and
paddy production to horticulture crops through • Crop planning.
• Re-allocation of culturable fellow land (5.13 lakh
ha.) and up-land under cereals (71,500 ha.).
• Lowering of establishment (due to high labour
input) and maintenance cost (especially due to
open grazing system) of horticulture crop.
To achieve the goal proper crop planning
and appropriate subsidy for area expansion will be
given from NHM. Institutional linkages will be
developed with KVK for motivation of farmers.
iii. Preparation of Comprehensive Land Use Plan to
introduce horticulture cultivation in • Culturable fallow land (5,13,000 ha.).
• Marginal land & Common land (3,44,000 ha.).
• Land under miscellaneous tree crops (1000 ha.)
and old orchards on common land (3000 ha.).
To achieve the goal area identified for horticulture
development shall be put before land use board and a
comprehensive plan shall be made. Land identified for
the horticulture shall not be diversified for the other
purpose.
C. Organic Farming and Organic Certification –
Chattisgarh is by-default practicing organic cultivation
especially in the tribal belt, mainly due to the low paying
capacity for modern agri-inputs of the farmers. Thus the state
does not need to invest much for promotion of organic farming
systems rather the need is –
•
To identify and develop a network of resource persons to
integrate the modern technical knowledge of vermicomposting and Integrated Pest Management with the
traditional knowledge base.
•
For promotion of organic cultivation in the state, it
neither requires high capital inputs nor a paradigm shift
from inorganic to organic practices but an intensive
awareness and sensitization campaign through
demonstration is needed.
Already existing organic practices in the state create a conducive
environment to go for organic certification of products. Therefore –
•
The state has already identified target species like Mango,
Cashew nut, Lime, Banana, Papaya and Aloevera for organic
certification (11,000 ha.).
•
The emphasis of the state will be on persuing different stages
for certification through promotion of Good Agriculture
Practices (GAP).
To achieve the goal, along with inputs from NHM,
institutional linkages will be developed with KVKs, NGOs
and Training Organizations for capacity building and skill
up-gradation and certification bodies like CGCERT. To
institutilize organic certification system and setting-up of
ICS help of NERAMC will be taken up.
D.
Creating credit linkages  In Chattisgarh a large proportion of farmers cultivate crops
like off-season vegetables and watermelon in the river beds
(10,000 ha.) that come under common land. They could not
avail loan facilities from the bank as they do not own the land
and have to take loan from the local money lenders with a
high interest rate. On the other hand they face high risk of
crop loss due to unpredictable flood but could not access the
protection of loan waiver facilities provided by the
government as they could not avail loan from the organized
financial institutions.
 Most of the forms of the banks that needed to be filled up by
the farmers are in English that creates a hindrance for
dissemination of information. The selection criteria for
getting the loan from the bank is also such that most of the
farmers can not avail the facilities.
 Distribution and reach of Kisan credit cards are also limited to
the big farmers. In most cases members of one big farmer’s
family have got number of credit cards. Thus the benefits are not
distributed equitably rather are limited to few even though the
total number of credit cards distributed may be quite large.
Thus• It is required to take the landless, marginal and small farmers of
the state in the fold of financial institutions like banks through
creating awareness among the farmers about their entitlements,
better coordination with banks and government agencies to reduce
the cumbersome processing practices.
To achieve the goal linkages will be developed with Lead
Banks, nationalized banks, Rural Banks & Primary
Agricultural Societies.
E.
Production of planting material for assured
supply of quality planting material through •
Strengthening the existing nurseries,
developing model nurseries (114), small
nurseries (133 in private sector), setting up
new Tissue Culture units (9) and
Rehabilitation of existing TC (4).
To achieve this goal financial assistance from
NHM & RKVY and technical assistance from
training institutions (for gardeners) and
NERAMC will be taken.
F. Promotion of Horticulture Mechanization –
To increase the efficiency and increase in productivity
promotion of horticulture mechanization will taken up in
a big way through –
•
Introduction of small tractors (1645), rotavators
(2200), levelers, power tillers, earth augers, seed
drillers, ridge and furrow makers, reapers, power
sprayers, tractor mount sprayers, power operated
pruning saw/chain saw, weed/bush cutters (1760) and
plastic crates, to help in increasing productivity.
To achieve this goal financial assistance from
NHM & RKVY and technical assistance from CG Seed
Corporation Limited will be taken.
G. Proper Harvesting and Post Harvest Management of Crops –
Shifting of focus from expansion of area to PHM, Marketing
and Processing of the produce through The state has identified 96 potential production clusters and
collection centers. The analysis has been made to identify the
quantum of produces that needs to be stored. Based on the volume of
produce further analysis is being made to design the storage facilities
with requisite space. Based on the calculation establishment of 41
cold storages and 75 low cost onion storage is planned which are
distributed across the state.
•
•
To give access to the farmers in different agro-climatic zones.
To reduce transportation cost and promote horticulture cultivation.
 Among the horticulture crops in the state Tomato (60,000 Mt.),
Mango (55,000 Mt.) and Cashew-nut (4000 Mt.) are identified as
major target crops for further processing and value addition. The
crops are identified based on their surplus production.
•
To make it economically viable for processing.
 Based on the production and collection centers of
horticulture products a market network is planned.
•
To cater to the need of the farmers right from the village
level to the terminal market. Focus is being made to develop
a network of primary rural markets with appropriate
infrastructure (113), whole sale market (13), terminal market
(1) across the states to give benefit to the farmers just after
the farm-gate level.
•
Analysis is made based on the crop wise production volume
(8.53 lakh Mt. vegetable and fruits) that can be marketed and
designed.
•
Input support for marketing of the products by creating
pre-cooling units (18), zero energy based cool chamber
(3155), low energy cool chambers (44), mobile pre-cooling
unit (1), ripening chamber (16) and pack houses (848) for
increasing the price premium of the crops.
 It is planned to develop institution such as Growers Association at the
village/cluster of villages level who will purchase the products from the
primary rural market/collection center/farm-gate and sell to the whole
sale market.
•
Whole sale markets will be developed at the blocks/district level based on
the potential of the crops. Growers association / farmers will get the
opportunity to participate in the open auction to sell the products in the
wholesale market.
•
The growers association / farmers will also get the opportunity to sell
their products in the terminal market to be setup at Raipur.
•
During the planning attention has been given to ensure developing market
facilities across the state so that farmers from all the districts get the
opportunity to market their products with assured return.
To achieve this goal linkage will be developed with CG Rajya Krishi
Vipran Board (Mandi Borad) and financial assistance from NHM &
RKVY will be taken. At head quarter level a marketing cell is also being
established.
 Establishment of network for disseminating real time
information of product prices. A market information system
will be developed. Farmers can access the real time information
related to product prices through the e-kiosks to be set at the
primary rural market / wholesale market / terminal market
level where information will be uploaded about the prices of the
major mandis of the state as well as other cities of the country.
The farmers can also get registered in the mobile phone network
through which they will be receiving information in their mobile
phone periodically.
•
This will help farmers gaining better bargaining power, price
forecasting and planning for marketing their products.
To achieve this goal linkages will be developed with ORG
NIELSEN. The firm has already started the base work for
collection of data related to production, processing and marketing
of horticulture products from all the districts of the state.

Developing Management Information System (MIS) right
from point of production to collection, storage, processing
and marketing at different levels using Geographic
Information System (GIS).
•
To facilitate effective decision making both at the Mission
Management Level and Farm Level.
To achieve this goal linkages will be developed with the
firms having experience of developing and implementing such
programs in natural resource based activities.
Linkage of production clusters with PHM
No. of
No. of
Total
Total
Total expected
district production area
expected
Surplus
Cluster (in ha.) production Production
available available for
for
cold chain/
marketing
processing
(Mt.)
(Mt.)
1.
2.
4.
5.
Proposed cold chain unit with location Proposed
& expenditure for each item like Cold processing
storage, Pack houses, Refrigerated
unit with
vans, Packaging unit, Pre-cooling
location,
units, Zero energy cool chamber, On- capacity &
farm collection & storage unit & other expenditure
unit suitable to the cluster
6.
7.
i.
11
96
51726
852375
347120
Zero energy cool chamber
(1 Mt.) – 3155
ii. Low energy cool chambers
(8 Mt.) – 44
iii. Pack house – 848
iv. Pre-cooling unit – 18
v. Ripening chamber – 16
vi. Refrigerated van – 8
vii. Mobile pre-cooling unit – 1
viii. CA cold storage – 5
ix. Cold storage – 36
x. Big refrigerators – 0
xi. Refrigerated containers – 0
xii. Low cost onion storage –75
8.
Tomato
pulp puri
Processing
unit- 3 Nos.
&
Cashew
Processing
unit- 5 Nos.
Linkage of production clusters with markets
No. of
No. of
No. of
Total
No. of
No. of
No. of
No. of
No. of
district production collection area of existing existing proposed proposed
proposed
clusters
centre
crops nearest forwarding Primary
Whole
Terminal
(a place (in ha.) market Market/
Rural
Market &
Market
from
linkage Terminal Market & Expenditure
with
where
(Haat/
Market
Exp.
(Rs. in
Expenditure
produce is
Bazar)
(Rs. in
Lakh)
(Rs. in
collected
Lakh)
Lakh)
& directly
goes to
various
markets)
1.
2.
3.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11
96
80
51726
209
57
113.00
13.00
---
H. Human Resource Development –

It is very important to build the capacity of both the farmers and the
staff on issues related to production, harvesting, post harvest
management of products on the one hand and soft skills and
managerial skills like inter-personal communication, leadership,
institution building, group management and financial management
on the other. It is extremely important to build efficient resource
persons from within the department and also from among the
farmers who can act as peer educators and change agents to
implement the program especially adoption of new practices /
technology.
Capacity building programs are designed in the following model –
•
Training Need Assessment (TNA) –

•
Training will not be uniform in nature rather modules will be developed
based on training need assessment of the stakeholders keeping in mind
the project objectives, project deliverables and existing gaps in
performance.
For the farmers –


Issue based in situ training within the district for a batch of 50 farmers
per training.
Exposure visits/study tours within the district, within the state, outside
the state
•
For the Technical Staff / Field Functionaries
•
•
•
•
For the Supervisors and Entrepreneurs
•
•
•
Refreshers course at the district level
Training of Trainers for selected officials at the state level
Resource Person Development program with study tour outside the
state.
Training of supervisors on project management and project
monitoring.
Training of Entrepreneurs from among the progressive farmers on
entrepreneurship development, modern techniques of agri-business.
For the Gardeners
•
Training on garden management and rejuvenation of senile orchards.
To achieve this goal help of the prestigious training institutes
will be taken. Such type of Capacity Building Interventions in the
form of training is already going on in the state.
Schedule of training activities - Pert
Phase - I
Sl.
No
Training Activities
1.
Training for farmers
& PRI in the state
2.
Training for farmers
& PRI outside the
state
3.
Training of Trainers
4.
Resource persons
development
program
5.
Project Management
for mission staff
6.
Refreshers course for
senior level officials
7.
Refreshers course for
extension officers
Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep
Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb
Schedule of training activities - Pert
Phase - II
Sl.
No.
Training Activities
1.
Training for
farmers & PRI in
the state.
2.
Training for
farmers & PRI
outside the state.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Training of
Trainers.
Project
Management for
mission staff.
Refreshers course
for extension
officers.
Certificate course to
develop para
professionals.
Mar Apr May Jun
Jul
Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb
Schedule of training activities - Pert
Sl.
No
Training
Activities
1.
Training for
farmers & PRI in
the state
2.
Training for
farmers & PRI
outside the state
3.
4.
5.
Project
Management for
mission staff
Refreshers
course for
extension officers
Certificate
course to develop
para
professionals
Phase - III
Mar
Apr May Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct Nov Dec
Jan
Feb
Change in cropping pattern
Observation –
– Overall food grain sector has experienced a decline in area of
paddy (-8.45%) and coarse cereals (-63.18%) in last 5 years.
This shift is in area from food grains is towards fruits (181%),
vegetables (137%), spices (119%) and oil seeds (112%).
– The gain in horticulture area is a collective impact of
diversification of production pattern of farmers and increase
demand of consumers due to shift in their consumption pattern.
Sl. No.
Crop
2004-05
2008-09
% age increase in the area during last 5
years
1.
Paddy
39,43,800
36,10,470
-8.45
2.
Wheat
99,200
1,65,120
66.45
5.
Oilseeds
2,89,400
6,14,040
112.17
7.
Coarse cereals
1,94,200
71,500
-63.18
8.
Fruits
46,247
1,30,098
181.31
9.
Vegetables
1,23,491
2,93,764
137.88
10.
Spices
28,399
62,391
119.69
11.
Flowers
1508
2390
58.48
Feasibility of shift towards horticulture
Observation –
–
–
–
–
–
–
Cost-benefit ratio of horticulture is more than CBR of cereals. Thus it
is more profitable for farmers to diversify towards fruit and vegetable
cultivation then cereals, especially paddy and coarse grain.
Issue of diversification is needed to meet the increasing domestic
demand of fruit and vegetables beside the improving income.
Share of Mango in total fruit area change is about 27% and it is the
only crop which is grown across the all agro-climatic zones.
Cashew-nut (19%), Banana (10%), Guava (13%), Lime (7%),
Papaya (7%) and vegetable Tomato (22%), Brinjal, Okra and
Cauliflower (15% each) among spices Chili (38%), Coriander (22%),
Turmeric (16%) and Ginger (18%) have seen major changes in the
area in last 10 years.
Due to shorter duration of winter period Banana and Papaya are
grown and supplied to other states, for whom these are off-season
crops.
Kharif Potato is fast emerging crop, major portion of which is
exported outside of the state.
Change in Area under Major Horticulture crop
(in ha.)
Sl. No.
1.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1
2
3
4
5
Crops
Increase in Area Increase in Area Increase in Area Total Area up
during 2000-2004 during 2005-2009 during 2000-2009 to 2008-09
%age
Change in
area
2.
Mango
Cashew
Banana
Guava
Lime
Papaya
Jack Fruits
Custerd Apple
Litchi
Total Fruits Turmeric
Ginger
Chilli
Coriander
Garlic
3.
481
77
215
2165
235
144
353
496
1241
5407
454
1269
4740
3408
386
4.
18156
13443
6652
7173
5127
4653
4625
2000
1345
63174
5159
4901
8026
4121
1045
5.
18637
13520
6867
9338
5362
4797
4978
2496
2586
68581
5613
6170
12766
7529
1431
6.
37288
17712
9292
10814
7254
8063
5408
3635
1782
101248
5522
7411
18318
9187
3343
7.
27.18
19.71
10.01
13.62
7.82
6.99
7.26
3.64
3.77
100.00
16.75
18.41
38.10
22.47
4.27
Total Spices -
10257
23252
33509
43781
100.00
Change in Area under Major Horticulture crop
(in ha.)
Sl. No.
Crops
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
2
Tomato
Brinjal
Cauliflower
Okra
Cabbage
Potato
Onion
Arbi
Peas
Total Vegetable 1
2
Merigold
Tube Rose
Chrysanthemu
3
m
4
Gladiouls
5
Rose
Total Flowers -
3
4737
1440
669
2204
468
2832
693
536
540
4
18520
13084
12258
13194
8971
10203
4871
4529
2636
5
23257
14524
12927
15398
9439
13035
5564
5065
3176
6
39213
24249
16095
23452
13597
32126
8777
7247
10266
%age
Change in
area
7
22.72
14.19
12.63
15.04
9.22
12.73
5.43
4.95
3.10
14119
88266
102385
175022
100.00
90
20
394
94
484
114
889
151
60.80
14.32
0
65
65
142
8.17
30
20
160
48
35
636
78
55
796
51
546
1779
9.80
6.91
100.00
Increase in Area Increase in Area Increase in Area Total Area up
during 2000-2004 during 2005-2009 during 2000-2009 to 2008-09
Production trend of horticulture crop
Area expansion trend of horticulture crop
Area & Production of horticulture crop
(Area in lakh ha./Production in Mt.)
2004-05
2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
Crops
Area
Prod.
Area
Prod.
Area
Prod.
Area
Prod.
Area
Prod.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Fruits
0.46
3.24
0.75
6.43
1.00
6.81
1.25
9.32
1.30
9.78
Veg.
1.23
12.50
1.96
24.32
2.36
23.40
2.93
29.25
2.94
29.04
Spices
0.28
1.70
0.29
1.68
0.41
1.99
0.54
2.89
0.62
4.26
Aromatic
0.02
0.11
0.02
0.12
0.10
0.59
0.12
0.66
0.12
0.66
Flowers
0.02
0.03
0.02
0.03
0.02
0.04
0.02
0.07
0.02
0.07
Total -
2.02
17.57
3.04
32.58
3.89
32.82
4.85
42.18
5.00
43.81
Production trend of Horticulture
Observation –
– Area of fruit and vegetable is increased sharply from
2005-06 to 2007-08 but now it is static.
– Production of fruits grew at the rate of 40% initially but
later production has declining due to the fact that new
orchards are in their gestation period and old orchards
are becoming senile.
– The productivity of all major horticulture crops except
Okra, Coriander, Cashew-nut, Lime and Banana, is
lower than its potential.
– Although productivity is increasing but still far below
than the expected yield potential. In Mango (-4.1
Mt./ha.), Litchi (-1.08 Mt./ha.), Custard apple (-3.99
Mt./ha.), Okra (-1.1 Mt./ha.), Ginger (-5.8 Mt./ha.) and
Turmeric (-4.1 Mt./ha.) have shown decline in yield in
last 5 years.
Domestic demand & Supply
(Unit – in Kg. per person per annum)
Per capita
consumption
(2008-09) - in
Kg./person/ annum
Fruit Vegetable
11
60
Total production
(2008-09) – in lakh
Mt.
Total demand (200809) – in lakh Mt. *
Fruit
Vegetable
Fruit
Vegetable
9.78
29.04
2.20
12.00
Per capita demand
(2020) – in
Kg./person /annum
** & ***
Fruit
Vegetable
17
95
Total production
(2020) – in lakh Mt.
****
Fruit
Vegetable
13.9
41.34
(Source – National Sample Survey Organization (NSSO) collects data on house hold consumption
by sample survey techniques. This study uses data from consumer expenditure survey
of National Sample Survey (NSS) of rounds number 55 pertaining to year 1999-2000).
*
Demand projection is made on assumptions about populations, urbanization, povery
and economic growth per capita demand.
**
Future population growth will follow the past population growth trend and urban
population proportion in total population will also follow past trends.
***
8% GDP growth rate per year is assumed.
****
Future production of horticulture crop will follow the current trend of 3% growth per
annum.
Observation Chhattisgarh in-spite of being one of the largest producers of
vegetables and spices does not have much export volume because of huge
domestic demand. Besides this there are supply constraints and huge post
harvest losses which lead to lower net availability of produces.
Supply chain from farm-gate to market
(Unit – inLakh Mt.)
2008-09
Commodity
Total
annual
production
Post harvest
losses
1.
2.
3.
Total annual
consumption
within the state
(raw form)
4.
Fruit
9.78
3.91
Vegetables
29.04
11.61
Raw material
used for
processing
Total surplus
for export to
other states
Total import
from other
states
5.
6.
7.
2.20
0.60 *
1.07 ***
1.10
12.00
1.00 **
6.43 ****
1.25 *****
(Source – National Sample Survey Organization (NSSO) collects data on house hold consumption
by sample survey techniques. This study uses data from consumer expenditure survey
of National Sample Survey (NSS) of rounds number 55 pertaining to year 1999-2000).
*
Mango is the main crop used for processing Amchoor and Pickle.
**
Tomato is the main crop used for processing Ketchup and Purie.
***
Papaya, Cashew-nut, Banana and Mango are the main crops exported to other states.
**** Tomato, Cauliflower, Cabbage, Kharif Potato, Brinjal, Okra, are the main crops
exported to other states.
***** Potato, Onion and Garlic are mojor crops imported from other states.
Observation -
The annual per capita consumption of vegetable has increased.
The increase in consumption levels of vegetable and fruits has been quite
similar in both the rural and urban areas.
Supply chain from farm-gate to market
2008-09
(in Lakh Mt.)
Issues in PHM
– Lack of awareness among farmers in the field of
PHM. Department is also not properly equipped
with knowledge / resources to motivate farmers.
– Capital intensive activity, it requires huge capital
investment and technical know-how to establish
entire cold-chain.
– To make PHM successful activity about 300-400.00
crore rupees are required within 5 years. Neither the
farmers nor the entrepreneurs of Chhattisgarh are
financially capable of investing this huge capital
amount. Therefore intervention from government is
required.
– Subsidy given for PHM and marketing is not
attractive and lucrative. Provision of credit linked
back ended subsidy is major de-motivating factor
for availing subsidy.
Issues in PHM
– At present horticulture is a individual activity, there
is no system of group farming or contract farming.
Since entire cold chain management requires
sufficient quantity of raw material to operate it
efficiently and optimally. For bulk production,
compact production cluster of particular produce is
required.
– For processing, round the year availability of raw
material is essential to make it viable. To ensure
availability of raw material during off-season safe
storage of raw material in the glut season is
required.
– In marketing sector private entrepreneurs are not
coming forward due to various reason like capital
investment APMC Act, geographical remoteness and
mind set and barnding.
Issues in Marketing
– APMC Act prohibits transaction outside the
regulated mandis and does not allow direct
marketing and direct procurement of agriculture
produce from farmers fields. APMC implementation
restricts the setting up of markets other than by the
state government. This restricts the scope for
corporate houses venturing into horticulture sector.
– In absence of institutions like Grower Associations,
Farmers Cooperative/Society, Common Enterprise
Group, Contract Farming etc., marketing sector is
unable to organize and strengthen.
– Single gateway to regulated market would save time
and improve efficiency.
Issues in Marketing
– Participation of private sector to contract farming and land
leasing arrangements will allow accelerated technology
transfer, capital flow and assured market for horticulture.
– Food processing industry on part of private sector should be
simplified and encouraged, therefore backward linkages of
horticulture crop can be developed.
– Most of the produce is directly procure from the field of big
farmers by commission agents / middle man from outside the
state.
– Small farmers are depend on village merchants or on nearby
rural markets to lift their surplus produce. Infrastructure
development at all the tires of market is essential to organize
small farmers having no bargaining power, quality incentive
and share in final consumer price.
– Vertical coordination of farmers with cooperatives / societies,
contract farming and retail chain would facilitate them to
deliver better output due to lower risk, better infrastructure,
better price and created awareness to prevailing technology.
Planting material sub-plan 2010-11
Sl.
No.
Fruit crop
Target
(in ha.)
No. of
Total no. of
plants per ha. plants required
1.
Mango
1600
100
2.
Litchi
700
3.
Lime
4.
Procurement
Self
Out
sourcing
160000
160000
-
150
105000
54113
50887
600
277
166200
166200
-
Aonla
500
100
50000
-
50000
5.
Guava
950
277
263150
95000
168150
6.
Custard apple
200
100
20000
-
20000
7.
Nashpati(Pear)
100
277
27700
27700
-
8.
Sweet Lime
200
277
55400
-
55400
9.
Banana (TC)
1250
2500
3125000
-
3125000
10.
Papaya
450
2500
1125000
1125000
-
11.
Cashewnut
1300
100
130000
-
130000
Total
7850
-
5227450
1628013
3599437
Planting material sub-plan 2010-11
Sl.
Spices crop
No.
Procurement
Target
(in ha.)
Seed rate
per ha.
(in Kg.)
Total Seed
Requirement
(in Kg.)
Self
Out sourcing
1.
Garlic
300
500
150000
-
150000
2.
Chilli
4000
0.30
1200
-
1200
3.
Coriander
2100
20
42000
-
42000
4.
Methi
400
8
3200
-
3200
5.
Ginger
2500
2500
6250000
-
6250000
6.
Turmeric
1500
2500
3750000
-
3750000
Total
10800
10196400
-
10196400
Planting material sub-plan 2010-11
Sl.
No.
Flower crop
Target
(in ha.)
Plant/Seed/
Bulb rate
per ha.
1.
Rose
200
18000 (Nos.)
2.
Gerbera
150
3.
Rajnigandha
4.
Total
Plant/Seed/
Bulb
Requirement
Procurement
Self
Out
sourcing
3600000
(Nos.)
-
3600000
(Nos.)
83000 (Nos.)
12450000
(Nos.)
-
12450000
(Nos.)
600
45000 (Nos.)
27000000
(Nos.)
-
27000000
(Nos.)
Gladiolus
1150
45000 (Nos.)
51750000
(Nos.)
-
51750000
(Nos.)
5.
Marigold
600
0.6 (Kg.)
360(Kg.)
-
360(Kg.)
6.
Chrysanthemum
50
0.8 (Kg.)
40(Kg.)
-
40(Kg.)
7.
Galardia
200
1 (Kg.)
200(Kg.)
-
200(Kg.)
2950
-
-
-
-
Total
Planting material sub-plan 2010-11
Sl.
Aromatic crop
No
Target
in ha.
Plant/Seed/
Slips per ha.
Total
Plant/Seed/
Bulb
Requirement
Procurement
Self
Out sourcing
1.
E.Citridora
1050
1500 (Nos.)
1575000
-
1575000
2.
Pamaroza
200
6.25 (Kg.)
1250
-
1250
3.
Vetiver
300
25000 (Slips)
7500000
-
7500000
4.
Lemongrass
950
20000 (Slips)
19000000
-
19000000
2500
-
-
-
-
Total
Impact of NHM
Sl. No.
1.
1.
Exp.
Output
Phy.
No. of
Activity
Unit
(Rs. in (Production
Impact
Increase
Beneficiaries
lakhs)
in Mt.)
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Establishment of New Gardens 1. Fallow land brought under
A. Perennial crops cultivation.
2. Employment generation at rural
a. Mango
Ha.
15342 1725.9
level.
b. Litchi
Ha.
3614
406.57
3. Support to eco-system through
c. Lime
Ha.
3310
372.37
plantation.
34652
d. Aonla
Ha.
1036
66.09
4. Although fruit orchards are in
gestation period but initiation of
e. Custard
Ha.
1676
188.55
flowering and fruiting develop
Apple
confidence in beneficiaries &
encourage other farmers for area
f. Cashew
Ha.
11676 656.77
expansion.
B. Annual Crops 1. Returns from Banana is very high.
2. Farmers are getting 30 to 35 Mt.
average yield per ha.
3. Banana is exported to the other
states from Chhattisgarh.
1445
Banana
Ha.
3395
509.25
135800 4. Whole sale traders from Delhi, UP.
are purchasing farmers produce
from farm gate. Farmers need not
to pay charges of harvesting,
packing & transport to market.
Impact of NHM
Sl. No.
Activity
1.
2.
2.
Exp.
Output
Phy.
Unit
(Rs. in (Production
Increase
lakhs)
in Mt.)
3.
4.
5.
6.
a. Chili
Ha.
24360
2740.50
146160
b. Onion
Ha.
500
56.25
7790
c. Coriander
Ha.
1700
191.25
4760
d. Turmeric
Ha.
3600
405.00
25200
Impact
No. of
Beneficiaries
7.
8.
1. Under Spices Chilli has become
main crop and it occupies highest
position both in area &
production.
2. Due to cluster approach larger
area of spices developed in a
cluster which increased the
bargaining power & also facilitate
the farmers to send their produce
to distant markets where they
fetched good prices.
3. Farmers are now inclined to grow
these crops in larger area at their
own cost.
4. Chili is exported to the adjoining
states from Chhattisgarh.
35560
Spices crops -
e. Ginger
Ha.
3400
382.50
26520
Impact of NHM
Sl.
No.
1.
3.
Activity
Phy.
Unit
Increase
2.
3.
Floriculture crops -
4.
a. Rose
Ha.
250
b. Gerbera
Ha.
141
c. Tuberose
Ha.
1000
d. Gladiolus
Ha.
600
e. Marigold
Ha.
Ha.
1088
150
f. Chrysanthemum
4.
Community
Bore-wells
Nos.
4329
5.
Organic Farming
Ha.
4890
Exp.
(Rs. in
lakhs)
5.
Output
(Production in
Mt.)
6.
Impact
No. of
Beneficiaries
7.
8.
20 to 25 lakhs 1. Production of Cut flowers of
Roses, Gerbera, Tuberose &
cut flower
Gladiolus in the field of local
0.75 to 0.80
farmers fulfilling the local
49.35
lakhs cut
need of the state & also
flower
increased their income &
55 to 60 lakhs
open a new area of
450.00
cut flower
cultivation.
initially.
125 lakh sticks 2. Farmers are also exporting
270.00
the cut flowers to adjacent
approx.
markets like Nagpur,
130.56 13050 approx.
Culcutta out of state.
18.00
450 approx.
1. About 10800 ha. area is
brought under irrigation
through bore-wells.
2745.15
--2. Productivity of crops
increased due to assured
irrigation.
Farmers are motivated to use
traditional old techniques for
488.99
--production of crops. Process of
certification of the produce is in
progress.
87.50
5457
17316
4751
Impact of NHM
Sl. No.
Activity
1.
6.
2.
b. Portable
HDPE unit
8.
3.
4.
Exp.
(Rs. in
lakhs)
5.
Output
(Production in
Mt.)
6.
675.00
33.75 lakh
CFT.
Impact
No. of
Beneficiaries
7.
8.
Vermi compost units a. Pucca Tanka
7.
Phy.
Unit
Increase
Nos.
Ha.
Establishment of
Nos.
Model Nurseries
HRD
Nos.
2250
12600
3779.70
36.28 lakh
CFT.
1. Use of vermi compost is
improving soil health and
increasing production.
2. Cost of cultivation is also
reduced due to less use of
chemical fertilizer.
3. Farmers are also using vermi
wash as growth hormones.
58
1051.84
1. Plant production capacity of
departmental nurseries is
increased.
2. 14.24 lakhs plants produced
in the year 2008-09 in model
58 nurseries of NHM.
46,927
898.81
Training & exposure visits of
the farmers have been done.
9230
46,927
Action Plan 2010-11
Propsals by SAU .
Road Map from 2010-11 to 2014-15
2010-11
Sl.
No
Programme
1.
2.
A.
2011-12
2012-13
2013-14
2014-15
Total
Phy.
Tar
Fin.
Tar
Phy.
Tar
Fin.
Tar
Phy.
Tar
Fin.
Tar
Phy.
Tar
Fin.
Tar
Phy.
Tar
Fin.
Tar
Phy.
Tar
Fin. Tar
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
Plantation Infrastructure & Devlopment i) Model Nursery (No.) (a) Model Nursery
(Public Sector)
20
500.00
21
515.00
23
575.00
25
625.00
25
625.00
114
2840.00
(b) Model Nursery
(Private Sector)
7
87.50
9
112.50
11
137.50
13
162.50
15
187.50
55
687.50
20
62.50
25
78.13
28
87.50
30
93.75
30
93.75
133
415.63
7.50
0.00
1
7.50
1
7.50
4
30.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
0.00
1
100.00
4
400.00
ii) Small Nursery (No.) Small Nursery
(Private Sector)
iii) Rehabilitation of existing Tissue Culture (TC) units (No.) Private Sector
1
7.50
1
iv) Setting up of new
TC units (a) Public Sector.
1
100.00
1
100.00
1
100.00
(b) Private Sector
1
50.00
1
50.00
1
50.00
1
50.00
1
50.00
5
250.00
50
807.50
58
863.13
64
950.00
70
938.75
73
1063.75
315
4623.13
Total
2010-11
2011-12
2012-13
2013-14
2014-15
Total
Sl
Programme
Phy.
Tar
Fin.
Tar
Phy.
Tar
Fin.
Tar
Phy.
Tar
Fin.
Tar
Phy.
Tar
Fin.
Tar
Phy.
Tar
Fin.
Tar
Phy.
Tar
Fin. Tar
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
1
i) Seed production and distribution for Vegetables (Ha.) (a) Public sector
51
25.50
55
27.50
60
30.00
60
30.00
60
30.00
286
143.00
(b) Private sector
50
12.50
60
15.00
75
18.75
100
25.00
100
25.00
385
96.25
(C) Seed
Infrastructure (Public
Sector)
0
0.00
1
0.17
1
0.17
1
0.17
1
0.17
4
0.67
(a) Seed Infrastructure
(Public Sector).
2
400.00
1
200.00
1
200.00
1
200.00
0.00
5
1000.00
(b) Seed Infrastructure
(Private Sector)
1
100.00
1
100.00
1
100.00
1
100.00
1
100.00
5
500.00
104
538.00
118
342.67
138
348.92
163
355.17
162
155.17
685
1739.92
ii) Seed Infrastructure
Total
2
Establishment of New Gardens (Area Expansion) (Ha.) -
I.
Fruits (Non Perenial)i) Banana (TC)
(@50% subsidy)
1250
625.00
1300
650.00
1400
700.00
1450
725.00
1500
750.00
6900
3450.00
ii) Papaya (@50%
subsidy)
550
275.00
600
300.00
650
325.00
700
350.00
750
375.00
3250
1625.00
Fruits (Perenial) 60% subsidy 1st year
4850
803.73
5150
854.21
5425
901.41
5675
943.60
5550
924.11
26650
4427.07
Fruits (Perenial)- 20%
subsidy 2ndyear
3695
230.85
2520
162.54
2800
181.16
2940
190.47
2940
190.96
14895
955.98
Fruits (Perenial)- 20%
subsidy 3rd year.
520
32.80
2520
162.54
2800
181.16
2940
190.47
2940
190.96
11720
757.93
2010-11
2011-12
2012-13
2013-14
2014-15
Total
Sl
Programme
Phy.
Tar
Fin.
Tar
Phy.
Tar
Fin.
Tar
Phy.
Tar
Fin.
Tar
Phy.
Tar
Fin.
Tar
Phy.
Tar
Fin.
Tar
Phy.
Tar
Fin.
Tar
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
II.
Mushrooms (No.) (a) Spawn making unit i) Public Sector
2
30.00
3
45.00
3
45.00
2
30.00
2
30.00
12
180.00
ii) Private Sector
(@50%
subsidy).
2
15.00
3
22.50
3
22.50
2
15.00
2
15.00
12
90.00
(b) Compost making unit i) Public Sector
2
40.00
3
60.00
3
60.00
2
40.00
2
40.00
12
240.00
ii) Private Sector
(@50%
subsidy).
1
10.00
3
30.00
3
30.00
2
20.00
2
20.00
11
110.00
7
95
12
157.50
12
157.50
8
105.00
8
105.00
47
620.00
(a) Cut Flowers
350
122.50
450
157.50
550
192.50
650
227.50
550
192.50
2550
892.50
(b) Bulbulous
Flowers
1750
787.50
1850
832.50
1950
877.50
2000
900.00
1900
855.00
9450
4253
(c) Loose
Flowers
850
102.00
975
117.00
1100
132.00
1225
147.00
1100
132.00
5250
630.00
Total
III.
Flowers (Ha.) -
2010-11
2011-12
2012-13
2013-14
2014-15
Total
Sl.
No.
Programme
Phy.
Tar
Fin. Tar
Phy.
Tar
Fin. Tar
Phy.
Tar
Fin. Tar
Phy.
Tar
Fin. Tar
Phy.
Tar
Fin. Tar
Phy.
Tar
Fin. Tar
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
IV.
Spices (Ha.)
10800
1350.00
11400
1425.00
12000
1500.00
12700
1587.50
13000
1625.00
59900
7487.50
V.
Aromatic Plants
(Ha.)
2500
312.50
2700
337.50
2950
368.75
3150
393.75
3300
412.50
14600
1825.00
VI.
Plantation crops (Ha.) - 60% subsidy in
1st year.
1300
156.00
1400
168.00
1500
180.00
1600
192.00
1600
192.00
7400
888.00
- 20% subsidy in
2ndyear.
1840
73.60
1120
44.80
1200
48.00
1280
51.20
1280
51.20
6720
268.80
- 20% subsidy in
3rd year.
740
29.60
1120
44.80
1200
48.00
1280
51.20
1280
51.20
5620
224.80
3880
259.20
3640
257.60
3900
276.00
4160
294.40
4160
294.40
19740
1381.60
600
90.00
650
97.50
700
105.00
750
112.50
700
105.00
3400
510.00
Total 3
4
Rejuvenation of
Old
Orchards
(Ha.)
Creation of water resources (No.) i) Community
tanks/on farm
ponds
112
1680.00
150
2250.00
200
3000.00
250
3750.00
250
3750.00
962
14430.00
ii) Water
harvesting system
for individuals
480
288.00
500
300.00
550
330.00
600
360.00
600
360.00
2730
1638.00
iii) Borewells
1500
1050.00
1600
1120.00
1650
1155.00
1700
1190.00
1800
1260.00
8250
5775.00
2092
3018.00
2250
3670.00
2400
4485.00
2550
5300.00
2650
5370.00
11942
21843.00
Total
2010-11
2011-12
2012-13
2013-14
2014-15
Total
Sl.
No
Programme
Phy.
Tar
Fin.
Tar
Phy.
Tar
Fin.
Tar
Phy.
Tar
Fin.
Tar
Phy.
Tar
Fin.
Tar
Phy.
Tar
Fin.
Tar
Phy.T
ar
Fin.
Tar
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
69
154.10
85
205.19
110
275.38
140
347.44
145
353.88
549
1335.98
2. Plastic Mulching
1750
175.00
2000
200.00
2250
225.00
2500
250.00
2500
250.00
11000
1100.00
3. Shade Net House
305
419.35
375
523.00
460
684.60
575
855.75
575
855.75
2290
3338.45
4. Plastic Tunnels
170
25.50
200
30.00
250
37.50
300
45.00
300
45.00
1220
183.00
5. Anti Bird/Anti
Hail Nets
70
35.00
100
50.00
125
62.50
150
75.00
150
75.00
595
297.50
6. Cost of planting
material of high
value
vegetables
grown in poly
house
45
11.81
50
13.13
75
19.69
100
26.25
150
39.38
420
110.25
7. Cost of planting
material of flowers
for poly house
27
33.75
35
43.75
50
62.50
75
93.75
100
125.00
287
358.75
2436
854.51
2845
1065.06
3320
1367.16
3840
1693.18
3920
1744.00
16361
6723.92
5
Protected Cultivation (No.) 1. Green House
Structure
Total
2010-11
2011-12
2012-13
2013-14
2014-15
Total
Sl
Programme
Phy.
Tar
Fin. Tar
Phy.
Tar
Fin.
Tar
Phy.
Tar
Fin.
Tar
Phy.
Tar
Fin.
Tar
Phy.
Tar
Fin. Tar
Phy.
Tar
Fin. Tar
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
0.00
2
200.00
70.00
32200
322.00
0.00
8
32.00
160.00
11
880.00
0.00
7
280.00
6
Promotion of Integrated Nutrient Management (INM) / Integrated Pest Management (IPM) i)
Sanitary
and
Phytosanitary
infrastructure (Public
Sector) (No..)
1
100.00
5700
57.00
3
(a) Public Sector
(b) Private Sector
ii)
Promotion
IPM/INM (Ha.)
of
iii) Disease forecasting
unit (Public Sector)
(No.)
0.00
1
100.00
0.00
6000
60.00
6500
65.00
7000
70.00
12.00
2
8.00
2
8.00
1
4.00
3
240.00
2
160.00
2
160.00
2
160.00
1
40.00
2
80.00
2
80.00
2
80.00
7000
iv) Bio Control Lab (No.)2
v) Plant Health Clinic (No.)(a) Public Sector
4
80.00
5
100.00
5
100.00
5
100.00
6
120.00
25
500.00
(b) Private Sector
1
10.00
3
30.00
3
30.00
2
20.00
2
20.00
11
110.00
vi) Leaf / Tissue
Analysis Lab -Public
Sector (No.)
1
20.00
1
20.00
1
20.00
1
20.00
1
20.00
5
100.00
Total
559.00
458.00
563.00
454.00
390.00
2424.00
2010-11
2011-12
2012-13
2013-14
2014-15
Total
Sl
Programme
Phy.
Tar
Fin. Tar
Phy.
Tar
Fin. Tar
Phy.
Tar
Fin. Tar
Phy.
Tar
Fin. Tar
Phy.
Tar
Fin. Tar
Phy.
Tar
Fin.
Tar
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
7
Organic Farming (Ha.) (a) Adoption of organic farming i) 40% subsidy in
1st year.
1750
70.00
2000
80.00
2250
90.00
2500
100.00
2500
100.00
11000
440.00
ii) 30% subsidy in
2nd year.
650
19.50
2000
60.00
2250
67.50
2500
75.00
2500
75.00
9900
297.00
iii) 30% subsidy in
3rd year.
0
0.00
2000
60.00
2250
67.50
2500
75.00
2500
75.00
9250
277.50
(b) Organic Certification
i) 30% subsidy in
1st year
35
52.50
40
60.00
45
67.50
50
75.00
50
75.00
220
330.00
ii) 30% subsidy in
2nd year.
13
19.50
40
60.00
45
67.50
50
75.00
50
75.00
198
297.00
iii) 40% subsidy in
3rd year.
0
0.00
40
80.00
45
90.00
50
100.00
50
100.00
185
370.00
(c) Vermi compost units/organic input production unit (No.) i) Permanent
structure
ii)HDPE
Vermibed
Total
650
195.00
700
210.00
750
225.00
800
240.00
800
240.00
3700
1110.00
20000
1000.00
22000
1100.00
24000
1200.00
25000
1250.00
25000
1250.00
116000
5800.00
1356.50
1710.00
1875.00
1990.00
1990.00
8921.50
2010-11
2011-12
2012-13
2013-14
2014-15
Total
Sl.
No
Programme
Phy.
Tar
Fin.
Tar
Phy.
Tar
Fin. Tar
Phy.
Tar
Fin.
Tar
Phy.
Tar
Fin.
Tar
Phy.
Tar
Fin.
Tar
Phy.
Tar
Fin.
Tar
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
1
10.00
2
20.00
5
50.00
5
50.00
7
70.00
20
200.00
Honey bee colony
(No.)
3050
21.35
3200
22.40
3500
24.50
4000
28.00
5000
35.00
18750
131.25
Hives (No.)
3050
24.40
3200
25.60
3500
28.00
4000
32.00
5000
40.00
18750
150.00
Equipment
including honey
extractor (No.)
274
19.18
300
21.00
350
24.50
400
28.00
500
35.00
1824
127.68
8
Pollination support- beekeeping Production of
nucleus stock
Public Sector
Total -
74.93
89.00
127.00
138.00
180.00
608.93
9
Horticulture
Mechanization(No.)
880
660.50
1000
742.50
1125
818.75
1250
895.00
1350
978.75
5605
4095.50
10
Tech. dissemination
public sector(No.)
7
175.00
10
250.00
10
250.00
12
300.00
11
275.00
50
1250.00
11
Human Resource Development (HRD) (No.)(a) HRD for
Supervisors &
Entrepreneurs.
1
20.00
2
40.00
2
40.00
2
40.00
1
20.00
8
160.00
(b) HRD for
Gardeners.
1
15.00
2
30.00
2
30.00
2
30.00
1
15.00
8
120.00
(c) Training of
Farmers
10800
208.85
11400
228.50
11950
253.35
12800
293.00
13500
306.00
60450
1289.70
(e) Expousre visit of
farmers
10825
167.50
11430
192.25
11985
221.25
12840
258.90
13550
293.75
60630
1133.65
467
70.94
565
89.00
645
115.84
725
142.68
830
170.65
3232
589.10
(f) Training/Study
Tour
2010-11
2011-12
2012-13
2013-14
2014-15
Total
Sl
Programme
Phy.
Tar
Fin. Tar
Phy.
Tar
Fin. Tar
Phy.
Tar
Fin. Tar
Phy.
Tar
Fin. Tar
Phy.
Tar
Fin. Tar
Phy.
Tar
Fin. Tar
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
B
Integrated Post Harvest Management (No.) i) Pack house
305
457.50
150
225.00
150
225.00
150
225.00
93
139.50
848
1272.00
ii) Pre-cooling unit
4
28.5
2
12
3
18
5
30
4
24
18
112.5
iii) Mobile pre-cooling
unit
1
9.60
0.00
1
9.60
iv) Cold storage units
13
1605.00
5
600.00
8
960.00
7
840.00
3
360.00
36
4365.00
v) Processing units
3
22.00
2
14.00
1
6.00
1
6.00
1
6.00
8
54.00
v) C.A/M.A. Storage
units
0
0.00
1
640.00
1
640.00
2
1280.00
1
640.00
5
3200.00
vi) Refer
vans/Containers
3
28.80
2
19.20
2
19.20
1
9.60
0.00
8
76.80
viii) Ripening chamber
1
120.00
6
765.00
5
600.00
2
240.00
2
240.00
16
1965.00
ix) Evaporative / low
energy cool chamber
11
22.00
15
30.00
10
20.00
5
10.00
3
6.00
44
88.00
xi) Low cost onion
storage structure
50
27.50
10
5.50
10
5.50
5
2.75
0.00
75
41.25
xii) Pusa Zero energy
cool chamber
1300
28.60
500
11.00
500
11.00
700
15.40
155
3.41
3155
69.41
1691
2349.50
693
2321.70
690
2504.70
878
2658.75
262
1418.91
4214
11253.56
Total
0.00
0.00
0.00
2010-11
Sl
1
C
Programme
2
2012-13
2013-14
2014-15
Total
Phy.
Tar
Fin. Tar
Phy.
Tar
Fin. Tar
Phy.
Tar
Fin. Tar
Phy.
Tar
Fin. Tar
Phy.
Tar
Fin. Tar
Phy.
Tar
Fin. Tar
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
0.00
1
60.00
Establishment of Marketing Infrastructure for Horticultural Produce (No.)i)
Terminal
markets
0
0.00
1
60.00
ii) Wholesale
markets -
3
75.00
3
75.00
3
75.00
3
75.00
1
25.00
13
325.00
iii) Rural
Markets/Apni
Mandies/ Direct
Markets -
56
454.00
17
145.00
14
121.00
13
110.00
13
110.00
113
940.00
iv) Retail Markets /
Outlets
(environmentally
controlled) -
1
5.50
5
20.00
10
40.00
20
80.00
50
200.00
86
345.50
viii)
Market
extension activities
2
6.00
3
9.00
5
15.00
5
15.00
2
6.00
17
51.00
Total
D
2011-12
0.00
0.00
540.50
309.00
251.00
280.00
341.00
1721.50
State /Dist. level
Insti. Strengthning
715.12
750.00
845.00
900.00
915.00
4125.12
Seminars,
conferences,
workshops,
exhibitions, Kisan
Mela/TSG.
110.00
145.61
160.00
196.73
128.22
740.56
17327.42
18807.81
21103.95
23031.35
21907.63
102178.16
Mission Management -
Total -
FLOW CHART