Critical needs for new understanding of nutrient dynamics in Earth System Models Peter Thornton Oak Ridge National Laboratory Collaborators: Gautam Bisht, Jiafu Mao, Xiaoying Shi, Forrest Hoffman, Keith Lindsay, Scott Doney, Keith Moore, Natalie Mahowald, Jim Randerson, Inez Fung, Jean-Francois Lamarque, Johannes Feddema, Yen-Huei Lee NASA GSFC, 22 Feb 2011 Key Uncertainties • Nutrient limitation effect on CO2 fertilization • Nutrient – climate interactions – Is the “nitrogen as phosphorus proxy” hypothesis useful in the tropics? – Nutrient dynamics in a warming Arctic • Mechanisms and time scales for plant nutrient dynamics: – Competition (with microbes and other plants) – Uptake and storage (across days and seasons) – Deployment Nitrogen cycle Carbon cycle Atm CO2 photosynthesis Internal (fast) External (slow) denitrification N deposition Plant assimilation respiration litterfall & mortality Litter / CWD Soil Mineral N decomposition mineralization Soil Organic Matter Thornton et al., 2009 N leaching N fixation Land carbon cycle sensitivity to increasing atmospheric CO2 Offline CLM-CN Fully-coupled CCSM3.1 C-only C-N high Ndep low Ndep Effect of C-N coupling is to increase atmospheric CO2 by about 150 ppm by 2100, compared to previous model results Thornton et al., 2007 (left), and Thornton et al., 2009 (right) 1980s (TAR) 1990s (AR4) 2000-2009 (AR4) Atmospheric increase 3.3 ± 0.1 3.2 ± 0.1 4.1 ± 0.1 Emissions 5.4 ± 0.3 6.4 ± 0.4 7.2 ± 0.3 Net ocean-toatm -1.8 ± 0.8 -2.2 ± 0.4 -2.2 ± 0.5 Net land-to-atm -0.3 ± 0.9 -1.0 ± 0.6 -0.9 ± 0.6 Land use flux 1.7 (0.6 to 2.5) 1.6 (0.5 to 2.7) n.a. Residual land flux -1.9 (-3.4 to 0.2) -2.6 (-4.3 to -0.9) n.a. Land partitioning: Global C-cycle component estimates from IPCC AR4, 2007 N avail. (index) Influence of rising CO2 on NEE and N availability (CO2 – control) Single and combined effects on NEE LULCC All combined N dep CO2 Shevliakova 2009 (LM3V model result) Interaction effects for total land C CxN (3-way) N x LULCC C x LULCC All effects Land components of climate-carbon cycle feedback low Ndep high Ndep • Effect of C-N coupling on gamma_land is to reduce atmospheric CO2 by about 130 ppm by 2100, compared to previous model results • Net climate-carbon cycle feedback gain (including ocean response) is nearly neutral or negative, compared to positive feedback for previous models. Thornton et al., 2009 N dep Preind. Trans. Prog. CC CC+Ndep Fixed Ctrl Ndep All simulations with prescribed transient fossil fuel emissions warmer / wetter Rad CO2 Lower N Higher N cooler / drier N availability hypothesis Higher due to N deposition Does climate change mimic the effects of increased N deposition? Higher due to climate change Higher due to deposition and climate change Climate-carbon cycle feedback CO2-induced climate change (warmer and wetter) leads to increased land carbon storage ND effect CC effect • Both climate change (red curve) and anthropogenic nitrogen deposition (blue curve) result in increased land carbon storage. • Climate change producing uptake of carbon over tropics, opposite response compared to previous (carbon-only) results. Thornton et al., 2009 ND effect CC effect GPP • GPP response is highly correlated with gross N mineralization • Relationship between GPP and N min is similar for effects of climate change and direct N fertilization (anthropogenic N deposition). Gross N mineralization Thornton et al., 2009 ND effect CC effect • Increased N deposition causes increase in both SOM and vegetation carbon stocks • Radiatively-forced climate change causes a decline in SOM and an increase in vegetation carbon stocks. • Consistent with the hypothesis that increased GPP under climate change is due to transfer of nitrogen from SOM to vegetation pools. Thornton et al., 2009 • Does warming-induced carbon uptake in the tropics make sense if the most limiting nutrient is P instead of N? Photosynthesis C-N Coupling Schematic Potential GPP sets N demand Plants and microbes compete for N on basis of relative demand N Immobilization Soil Mineral N N Mineralization Plant N uptake GPP downregulated by N supply CLM-CN, GPP Multi-site comparison Mid-summer mean diurnal cycle Obs Model Original model: no plant N storage pool Soil mineral N Plant allocated N GPP obs model immob. mineralization 0 6 12 hour 18 24 12 hour 18 24 Revised model: plant N storage pool obs model N from storage (demand, storage) Soil mineral N Plant allocated N Pre-allocation plant N storage GPP N to storage (demand, availability) 0 6 Implications and Conclusions • Additional empirical constraints are required to reduce prediction uncertainty – warming (x CO2?) x nutrient manipulations • Tropical forest (areal extent, C stocks, C fluxes) • Arctic tundra and boreal forest • Brave new models – Introduce the known important mechanisms • Get the wrong answer for the right reasons • … to eventually get the right answer