Dellinger - LIFE at UCF - University of Central Florida

Orlando, Florida www.lowndes-law.com

The Patient Protection and

Affordable Care Act:

Legal Review

The Learning Institute for Elders (“LIFE”) at the University of Central Florida

March 25, 2014

By: Richard S. Dellinger, Esq., richard.dellinger@lowndes-law.com

© 2011 Lowndes, Drosdick, Doster, Kantor & Reed, P.A. All Rights Reserved

Jan. 8, 2013:

Constitutional History

Orlando, Florida | www.lowndes-law.com


The Health Care Debate


The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

• Signed into law March 23, 2010

• Individual mandate. Insurance provided through employer,

Medicaid, Medicare, Tricare, private insurance exchange.

Tax penalty for uninsured.

• Insurance exchanges set up to compare policies and buy insurance. Funding for states to do same.

• Coverage not denied for pre-existing conditions.

• Employer mandate for 50 full time employees or more or must pay a tax penalty.

• Medicaid expansion, subsidies to states, lose Medicaid funding if do not expand.


ACA Goals

• Drive down insurance cost by increasing number of people covered.

• Increase by expanding eligibility for

Medicaid (133% above poverty level).

• Increase by setting up exchanges to sell insurance and penalizing those who do not enroll.


ACA Implementation Problems

• States not cooperating with state based exchanges and Medicaid expansion.

• Federal exchange (healthcare.gov) website problems.

• Some prior plans not meet minimum levels, forcing people out of their plans.

• Businesses downsizing to part time to avoid 50 full time employees.


National Federation of Independent

Businesses v. Sebelius

• Individual Mandate : Minimum essential health coverage required for all. Provided by employer, government or purchased from private company through exchange.

• Medicaid Expansion : States must expand Medicaid to up to 133% of poverty level or lose all federal Medicaid funds.


National Federation of

Independent Businesses v.

Sebelius

• Florida and 12 other states filed lawsuit challenging ACA in Tallahassee on the date ACA signed into law.

• Later joined by 13 other states and


Businesses.

• Argue individual mandate exceeds

Congress’ authority under Constitution.


Article I, Article II, Article III


Congress’

(Enumerated) Powers

• Lay and Collect Taxes to pay debts and provide for general welfare of US (Sec. 8 cl. 1)

• Borrow Money (Sec. 8 cl. 2)

• Rules of Nationalization and Bankruptcy (Sec. 8 cl. 4)

• Coin Money (Sec. 8 cl. 5)

• Establish Post Offices (Sec. 8 cl. 7)

• Raise and Support Armies and Navy (Sec. 8 cl.

12-13)


Congress’ (Less

Enumerated) Powers

• To regulate Commerce with foreign

Nations, and among the several

States, and with the Indian tribes

(Sec. 8 cl. 3) (“Commerce Clause”).


Commerce Clause

Wickard v. Filburn (1942)

• Federal government can regulate quantity of wheat a farmer can grow for private consumption in order to stabilize wheat prices on the national market.


Congress’ (Less

Enumerated) Powers

• To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into

Execution the foregoing Powers and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof (Sec. 8 cl. 18) (“Necessary and Proper” or “Elastic

Clause”)


Necessary and Proper Clause

McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)

• “Let the end be legitimate, let it be within the scope of the constitution, and all means which are appropriate, which are plainly adapted to that end, which are not prohibited, but consist with the letter and spirit of the constitution,are constitutional.”


Necessary and Proper


The Elastic Clause


Lower Court

Decisions

• District Court: Congress has no power to require individual mandate.

• Eleventh Circuit: No power.

No tax so not within tax power. Not commerce so not within commerce power. Individual mandate struck down.


Lower Court

Decisions

• Sixth Circuit and DC

Circuit: Valid Exercise of

Commerce Power.

• Fourth Circuit: Can not consider future restraint on taxing power. Must pay tax first.

• Eleventh Circuit: Medicaid expansion valid exercise of

Spending Power.



Supreme Court

Review

Sonia Sotomayor, Stephen Breyer, Samuel Alito, Elena Kagan

Clarence Thomas, Antonin Scalia, John G. Roberts, Anthony Kennedy, Ruth Bader Ginsburg,


Supreme Court Justices

Sonia Sotomayor, Stephen Breyer, Samuel Alito, Elena Kagan

Clarence Thomas, Antonin Scalia, John G. Roberts, Anthony Kennedy, Ruth Bader Ginsburg,

Source: New

York Times, July

24, 2010 and 2 law professors

Supreme Court Evolution





John G. Roberts, Stephen Breyer, Elena Kagan

Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Sonia Sotomayor,

Antonin Scalia, Anthony Kennedy

Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito




(Roberts Opinion)

• Individual mandate provisions of the ACA which impose a tax on those who do not purchase health insurance is within Congress’ power to tax (IIIC)

(majority)

• Law remains valid and states may opt in.




(Roberts Opinion)

• Medicaid expansion . Threat to withhold all Medicaid funding to a state who refuses to participate in the federal regulatory program is overly coercive and therefore exceeds Congress’ powers under the

Spending Clause in Art. I, Sec. 8, cl. 1 (IVA)

• Law remains valid and states may opt in.




(Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, Alito

Opinion)

• Medicaid expansion . Threat to withhold all Medicaid funding to a state who refuses to participate in the federal regulatory program is overly coercive and therefore exceeds Congress’ powers under the

Spending Clause in Art. I, Sec. 8, cl. 1 (IVA)

• Entire law can not be carried out without this provision.


National Federation of Independent Businesses v.

Sebelius

(Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, Alito Opinion)

• Congress may not rely upon the Commerce Clause to force individuals into commerce (IIIA)(also dissent

Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, Alito so majority)

• Insurance regulation is not justified under the Necessary and Proper Clause because not a component of a valid exercise of Commerce Clause, so can not be incident to it (IIIA)(also dissent Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas and Alito so majority)




(Ginsburg Opinion)

• Individual mandate provisions are valid exercise of the commerce clause power because uninsured impacts large market for health insurance which everyone will ultimately participate

• Individual mandate provisions are a valid exercise of necessary and proper powers

• Medicaid expansion and decline to fund those who do not is a valid exercise of spending power.


Medicaid Expansion

• Attempting to expand to all between 0% and 133% of poverty line.

• Florida currently provides:

Adult Parents: 31% ($289/ mo)

Adult Non-Parents: No Coverage

Children (0-1): 206% ($1972/ mo)

Children (1-5): 140% ($1341/ mo)

Children (6-18): 133% ($1341/ mo)

(Source: Center for Medicaid adn CHIP Services Publication at medicaid.gov)


Federal Poverty Line

House hold

Size

3

4

5

1

2

6

7

8

100% 133% 150% 200% 250% 300% 400%

$11,670 $15,521 $17,505 $23,340 $29,175 $35,010 $46,680

15,730 20,921 23,595 31,460 39,325 47,190 62,920

19,790 26,321 29,685 39,580 49,475 59,370 79,160

23,850 31,721 35,775 47,700 59,625 71,550 95,400

27,910 37,120 41,865 55,820 69,775 83,730 111,640

31,970 42,520 47,955 63,940 79,925 95,910 127,880

36,030 47,920 54,045 72,060 90,075 108,090 144,120

40,090 53,320 60,135 80,180 100,225 120,270 160,360


Medicaid Expansion


Additional Cases

• Do religious owners of a family business have free exercise rights that are violated by the application of the contraceptive coverage mandate of the ACA?

• Conestoga Wood Specialties Corp. v. Sebelius,

(3 rd Cir) and Sebelius v. Hobby Lobby Stores,

Inc. (10 th Cir) Split

• Argument set for March 25, 2014


Executive Actions

• Treasury Department delays reporting requirements for businesses with 50 plus employees implementing the plans until

2016 (July 2, 2013).

• Allowing a hardship exemption or extension in current coverage for those given notice that their existing policies do not comply (Dec. 19, 2013).


Source: http://www.brookings.edu

/

Questions


Dellinger - LIFE at UCF - University of Central Florida

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

ACA Goals

Article I, Article II, Article III

Congress’

(Enumerated) Powers

Congress’ (Less

Enumerated) Powers

Commerce Clause

Wickard v. Filburn (1942)

Congress’ (Less

Enumerated) Powers

The Elastic Clause

Lower Court

Decisions

Lower Court

Decisions

Supreme Court

Review

Supreme Court Justices

Medicaid Expansion

Federal Poverty Line

Medicaid Expansion

Additional Cases

Executive Actions

Questions

Related documents

Products

Support

Dellinger - LIFE at UCF - University of Central Florida

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

ACA Goals

Article I, Article II, Article III

Congress’

(Enumerated) Powers

Congress’ (Less

Enumerated) Powers

Commerce Clause

Wickard v. Filburn (1942)

Congress’ (Less

Enumerated) Powers

The Elastic Clause

Lower Court

Decisions

Lower Court

Decisions

Supreme Court

Review

Supreme Court Justices

Medicaid Expansion

Federal Poverty Line

Medicaid Expansion

Additional Cases

Executive Actions

Questions

Related documents

Add this document to collection(s)

Add this document to saved

Suggest us how to improve StudyLib