Charlton et al (2000)

advertisement

Criminological Psychology

Charlton et al 2000:

St. Helena study

 In the exam, you may be asked to describe and evaluate a study other than Loftus &

Palmer’s

 Therefore, the Learning Outcomes for this session are that you will be able to:

 describe Charlton et al’s study (APRC)

 evaluate* the study (GRAVE)

 *make at least 2 positive and 2 negative evaluation points

 This relates to the AC in the spec, section 4a, page 44

 The Island of St. Helena is …

 One of the most isolated islands in the South

Atlantic Ocean

 2000km from mainland Africa

 Only accessible by boat

 A small, close-knit community where everyone knows each other

 And has approx. 5000 inhabitants (1000 children of school age)

The study …

 Background - before March 1995, the island of St Helena had no access to television

 Charlton and his colleagues began their study in 1993 (2 years before television was introduced to the island)

 This was a natural (field) experiment, where the independent variable (TV) was happening naturally and not manipulated by the experimenter

The study …

 Aim: to investigate the effects of television on children’s behaviour, particularly on pro-social and antisocial behaviour

 Pro-social behaviour is ...

 ... that which is intended to help others; it is characterized by a concern about the rights, feelings and welfare of other people

 Anti-social behaviour is ...

 ... behaviour which lacks consideration for others and may cause damage to the society, whether intentionally or through negligence

The study …

 Procedure:

 This was a cross-sectional design

 Researchers studied the playground behaviour of a random selection of schoolchildren (aged 3-8 years), from

2 of the island’s largest schools

 Video recorders were set up in the playgrounds of the schools four months prior to the introduction of television and once again five years later

The study …

 Procedure:

 The children’s free play during break times was recorded for a two-week period each time and researchers compared the findings to establish whether or not behaviour had changed as a result of television being introduced

 Playground behaviours were categorised as such:

 Pro-social – pro-social gestures/verbal comments; sharing, turn-taking and helping; displaying affection or consoling others; holding hands/arm-in-arm

 Anti-social – anti-social gestures/verbal comments; kicking, hitting, punching; seizing/damaging property; non-compliant holding/forcing

The study …

 Procedure:

 Independent researchers in the UK watched the video footage and tallied the number of times children/groups of children displayed these behaviours

 Two researchers watched the same video footage alone as many times as necessary and only agreed tallied behaviours were recorded in the results

The study …

 Results:

 Of 64 comparisons made between the behaviour of children at the start and the end of the study, only nine were statistically significant:

 Two showed decreases in anti-social behaviour amongst boys

 Five showed increases in pro-social behaviour

 Two showed decreases in pro-social behaviour in boys

The study …

 Results:

 Boys tended to display less hitting and pushing after television was introduced, but were also less willing to help and show affection

 Both boys and girls showed significant increases in prosocial behaviour overall

The study …

 Conclusion ...

 The introduction of television had no negative effect on children’s behaviour – in fact, quite the reverse!

 This finding shows longer-term effects and challenges the findings of most of the laboratory research into the effects of TV on children’s behaviour

Evaluation ...

 Strengths:

 The findings are high in ecological validity because the children were observed in their natural environment; video cameras were hidden, so the children would have played naturally

 Use of video recordings prevented researcher bias and observer fatigue; because the recordings were watched by two different researchers separately and agreed behaviours only were recorded, there was inter-rater reliability (this eliminates subjective interpretation of the behaviours)

Evaluation ...

 Limitations:

 The children’s viewing habits (types of programmes, hours of watching, etc.) were not analysed

*

, so it is difficult to assign any behaviour changes to the effects of watching TV

 The culture of parental control and close supervision on the island may have inhibited the children from imitating behaviour seen on the screen

 * Later research revealed that the types of programmes watched were different than those shown on the mainland; children’s programmes containing aggression were not broadcast

Download