Informational Governance and micro-macro links Gert Jan Hofstede, INF group The message 1.Informational governance is data management in context ● That means people management ● It inherits from group behaviour... ● ...which is strongly culture-driven 2. Informational governance involves self-organization ● That can be ‘grown’ using agent-based modelling (ABM) ● cf. the WU IP/OP theme Complex Adaptive Systems (CAS) Part 1. Information governance and transparency: bringing micro-macro links to life “Information governance, or IG, is the set of multi- disciplinary structures, policies, procedures, processes and controls implemented to manage information at an enterprise level, supporting an organization's immediate and future regulatory, legal, risk, environmental and operational requirements” (Wikipedia, 2014) “Transparency of a netchain is the extent to which all the netchain’s stakeholders have a shared understanding of, and access to, the product-related information that they request, without loss, noise, delay and distortion” (Hofstede, 2003) G.J. Hofstede (2003) Transparency in Netchains. In: Information Technology for a better Agri-Food Sector, Environment and Rural Living. Debrecen University, Debrecen, Hungary Old problem... G.J. Hofstede et al (2004) Hide or confide, the dilemma of transparency. Reed Business Information. Future state (Meat Information on Provenance in FIspace) Services: discovery / search / smartphone apps tracking EPCIS Repository FMS EPCIS EPCIS EPCIS Repository Repository Repository ERP ERP ERP tracing labelling breeding fattening at farm slaughtering deboning cutting packaging at abattoir /at food processer c.o. sjaak.wolfert@wur.nl Wholesale / Retail Transparency and micro-macro links Confide! Good for all ... Hide! Good for me ... Food chain: Micro-macro links A chain of products is really a network of people Transparency: • History • Operations • Strategy Models of organisation weak Denmark Sweden Singapore Great Britain United States Norway Switzerland Ge Uncertainty avoidance Austria Israel strong small China India Nederland Kenya Nigeria Pakistan Germany Switzerland Fr Luxembourg Italy Czeck Rep. Venezuela Brazil Panama Colombia Argentina Mexico Romania Costa Rica France Russia Japan Wallonie Vlaanderen Poland Uruguay Power distance large -8- Take home 1: solid ground Informational governance: = Information management+ = ‘How to organize informing’ n.b. differs systematically across cultures: Who: might vs right, How: rules vs reality Part 2, from micro to macro: CAS, self-organisation, emergence Our social reality: “We do not intend the consequences of our actions” Cristiano Castelfranchi, 2013 Individual intention System consequence 10 Understanding Emergence is among INF aims Social Simulation ● Non-linearity, emergence (= self-organization) ● Operationalizing social scientific theory ● Can be used on informational governance Modelling social reality NIAS-Lorentz Theme Group Sep 2013 – Jan 2014 (www.nias.nl) Lorentz workshop January 2014 (www.lorentzcenter.nl) Case: glass ceiling for girls Method: agent-based models of playground Conclusion: emergence > nurture > nature Methodological aside Begin study Select method Complex? yes Adaptive? yes ABM (agents perceive others / environment Run model, sensitivity analysis Validate agents Validate system behaviour Development psychology studies Draw conclusions , publish End study Example: Playground model 2014 (resulting from NIAS fellowship) RQ: What causes gender status differences? ‘Nature’: Girls’ vs boys’ ● Beauty ● Kindness ● fighting power ‘Nurture’: ● (Dyad: Rough and tumble) ● Category: Sex-difference-on-conferral ● All: Culture (‘masculinity’: group condones fighting) Emergence? Interface Effect of nature (kindness, power); & culture Process: Gender status gap 20.000 runs (or table output) SPSS Behav space .cvs Excel transpose Emergent effects: group and culture Take home 2: potential for CAS methods Generic social science can be used in ABM ● To simulate realistic motives Experimental findings can be used for specifics ● Gender difference studies ● Informational governance We are just getting started... 18