Faculty of Al-Alsun and Mass Communication
Persuasion and Public
Opinion- English
Com214
Handout
Contents
Contents .............................................................................................................................. ii
Introduction to Persuasion and Public Opinion .................................................................. 5
Chapter One: Persuasion, Public Opinion and Attitudes .................................................... 6
Persuasion Defined ................................................................................................. 7
Why do we study persuasion? Importance of Persuasion in our Daily Lives ....... 9
Persuasion and its effects on attitude, beliefs and behavior.................................. 10
Importance of persuasion and public opinion ....................................................... 20
The relationship between persuasion and public opinion ..................................... 22
Types of Campaigns covered in this course ......................................................... 24
The Persuasive Communication Triangle ............................................................. 26
Chapter Two: The Psychology of Persuasion ................................................................... 28
Early Rhetorical Theory: Aristotle’s Primary Pillars of Persuasive Appeals ...... 29
Social Judgement Theory...................................................................................... 33
Elaboration Likelihood Theory ............................................................................. 38
Diffusion of Innovation Theory ............................................................................ 43
Chapter Three: Persuasive Appeals and Techniques ........................................................ 51
Key Components of Persuasion ............................................................................ 51
Persuader ................................................................................................................... 52
Audiences: The Generative Forces of Persuasion .................................................... 54
Timing and Context .................................................................................................. 55
The Message: Importance of Motivational Appeals ................................................. 56
Cialdini’s ‘weapons of influence` ............................................................................. 60
Chapter Four: Persuasion in Context: Advertising Campaigns ........................................ 68
Brands and Branding............................................................................................. 69
Advertising and persuasion ................................................................................... 69
What are advertising Appeals? ............................................................................. 70
Common Advertising Appeals .............................................................................. 70
ii
Fear Appeal ............................................................................................................... 71
Guilt.......................................................................................................................... 74
Isolation Appeal ........................................................................................................ 77
Humor Appeal ........................................................................................................... 78
Story Telling Appeal ................................................................................................. 79
Personal/Positive emotional appeals ..................................................................... 80
Transformative Appeals: Associations ................................................................. 83
Rational-Functional Appeals ................................................................................. 85
Chapter Five: Persuasion in Context: Public Relations Campaigns for Corporations and
Brands ........................................................................................................................................... 88
Foundations of Persuasive Public Relations Campaigns ...................................... 89
Public Relations Campaigns Defined ................................................................ 90
Strategic Persuasive Objectives of Organizations ................................................ 91
Chapter Six: Persuasion in Context: Public Relations Campaigns for Social Change ..... 95
When are social issue campaigns likely to succeed? ............................................ 97
Persuasive Health Campaigns ............................................................................... 98
Social Issue Campaign Appeals .......................................................................... 103
Chapter Seven: Persuasion in Context: Social Media..................................................... 106
Social Media Campaigns Defined ...................................................................... 107
Difference between traditional and social media persuasion .............................. 108
Goals of Persuasion............................................................................................. 113
Mass Interpersonal Persuasion on Social Media ................................................ 118
Persuasive Techniques in Social Media .............................................................. 119
Forms of Digital Influence .................................................................................. 122
eWOM: Digital Buss. ............................................................................................ 122
Sponsored Content: .............................................................................................. 122
Opinion Mining and Sentiment Tracking: ......................................................... 122
Gamification .......................................................................................................... 122
Crowdsourcing and Crowdfunding: ................................................................... 124
FOMO: Fear of Missing Out................................................................................... 124
iii
Influence Marketing ................................................................................................ 126
Personalization and Targeting................................................................................. 128
Narrative and Storytelling ....................................................................................... 128
Trend-Jacking ......................................................................................................... 129
Chapter Nine: Persuasion in Context: News .................................................................. 133
The Purpose of Persuasion in News.................................................................... 133
Persuasive Techniques in News: Framing .......................................................... 134
Effect of Framing on Public Opinion:............................................................. 138
Chapter Ten: Persuasion in Context: Political Campaigns ............................................ 142
Political use of language and discourse .............................................................. 146
Message Crafting: Strategic Uses of Political Language .................................... 148
Persuasion Strategies: Common Political Language Devices ............................ 152
Messaging and framing ....................................................................................... 155
Chapter Eleven: Propaganda and Information Warfare ...................................... 157
Overview ................................................................................................................. 157
Propaganda Defined ................................................................................................ 158
Information Warfare Defined ................................................................................. 161
Types of Propaganda and Information Warfare Campaigns ....................... 162
Purpose of Propaganda and Information Warfare .............................................. 164
Using Social Media for Malicious Persuasion .................................................... 165
References ....................................................................................................................... 170
iv
Persuasion and Public Opinion
Introduction to Persuasion and Public Opinion
The primary goal of this book is to offer a systematic description and vocabulary for the
persuasive process, focusing on some of the same questions that first
drew the attention of philosophers. How do we change deep-seated attitudes?
What makes us susceptible to or immune from constant attempts to persuade us to
accept ideas, products, and people? How can advocates sometimes cause people to
deny their beliefs and accept actions that impose serious hardships? The answers to
these questions not only equip us to better adapt to our communication-saturated
world, but they also reveal some interesting and surprising characteristics of
human nature.
Persuasion takes no single form. It occurs in a diverse range of contexts and
media—from simple exchanges of opinions between friends to elaborate campaigns
designed for specific broadcast and Internet audiences. Persuaders may be as wellfinanced as the Microsoft Corporation or as resource-poor as a small band of homeowners fighting the decisions of a local zoning board. The range of human contacts
that call for effective advocacy is nearly endless. As citizens in Egyptian society, we cannot escape the responsibility for organizing or participating in public persuasion. As
friends, family members, and coworkers linked to a web of personal relationships, we
similarly face the necessity of managing a vast array of demands and opportunities.
In the remainder of this chapter we will offer a definition of persuasion and several
additional case studies. We will also offer a set of key propositions about persuasion.
(Woodward)
5
Persuasion and Public Opinion
Chapter One: Persuasion, Public Opinion and
Attitudes
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
After reading this chapter, you should be able to:





Define persuasion and public opinion.
Explain the significance of persuasion in society.
Explore the connection between persuasion and
public opinion formation.
Analyze how persuasive messages impact public
attitudes and beliefs and vice versa
Evaluate real-world examples of persuasive
campaigns and their impact on attitude, beliefs,
and behavior.
In today's interconnected world, where information flows ceaselessly through a myriad of media
sources, channels, and content, the concept of persuasion has never been more pertinent to our
lives. Whether we realize it or not, our choices, preferences, and even our beliefs are often
molded by the carefully crafted messages that permeate our daily existence. From the cars we
drive to the cereal we eat for breakfast, from the leaders we elect to the values we hold dear, the
persuasive hand of media professionals is ever-present, guiding us along the pathways of
knowledge and opinion.
Consider for a moment the countless decisions you make each day, influenced by the artful
words and captivating images skillfully selected by advertising wizards. Your choice of a car, a
toaster, or a simple box of cereal is not merely a matter of practicality but also a reflection of the
persuasive narratives woven into advertising campaigns. Similarly, when it comes to the realm of
politics, the impressions we form of candidates are often mediated through a kaleidoscope of
channels, from televised debates to the curated profiles on our social media feeds. Moreover, our
very understanding of what is deemed important in our culture is frequently dictated by the
messages and narratives that inundate our senses.
In the pages that follow, we embark on a journey of discovery, a quest to unveil the intricate
mechanisms of persuasion, the formation of public opinion, and the shaping of attitudes within
the realm of media. We will peel back the layers of this fascinating world to expose the subtle
6
Persuasion and Public Opinion
and not-so-subtle ways in which knowledge about people, places, and events is created and, at
times, meticulously orchestrated.
As we delve deeper, we will uncover the strategies employed by political figures to craft their
public personas, finely tuned to maximize their appeal through the lens of the media. We will
demystify the secrets of advertisers as they deftly segment audiences, aiming their persuasive
messages at ears most receptive to their entreaties. Additionally, we will scrutinize the profound
interplay of language, imagery, emotion, and logic in a world where nearly every facet of our
lives is mediated by screens, sounds, and symbols.
This chapter is not just an academic endeavor; it is a practical guide for navigating the
multifaceted landscape of persuasion that envelops us. By the chapter's conclusion, you will be
equipped with the tools to discern and comprehend the myriad ways in which persuasion
operates in our mediated society. You will gain insights into how public opinion is forged,
attitudes are molded, and beliefs are swayed amidst the incessant flow of information and
narratives that saturate our lives.
Persuasion Defined
In the world of human communication, persuasion is a complex and enduring idea. It has
fascinated scholars and thinkers for centuries, spanning different times and fields of study. In this
section, we will explore the core of persuasion, which has a rich history and enduring relevance.
Erwin Bettinghaus and Michael Cody explain persuasion by saying it's when one person
or a group tries to change how another person or group thinks, believes, or acts by sending them
a message. They defined it as “a conscious attempt by one individual or group to change the
attitudes, beliefs, or the behavior of another individual or group of individuals through the
transmission of some message” (Bettinghaus & Cody, 1987, p. 3). In other words, persuasion is
about trying to convince or influence someone to change their thoughts, beliefs, or actions by
talking to them or sending them messages.
Even though persuasion can be powerful, it doesn't always succeed. There are times when it fails
to change how someone thinks or acts. Think of it like this: just as some businesses close down
shortly after they open, persuasive messages don't always make people change their minds or
behavior. But what's important to know is that persuasion is when someone deliberately tries to
make another person think or act differently. Persuaders must want to change how someone feels
or behaves, and they have to know, at least to some extent, that they're trying to do this (Perloff).
For example, imagine a friend trying to persuade you to join a sports team. They want you to
change your attitude about joining, and they know they're trying to convince you to do it. That's
persuasion in action.
The central argument here is that persuasion involves a deliberate effort to sway another person's
beliefs or actions while recognizing that the person being persuaded can have their mindset
altered. For instance, consider a marketing campaign trying to convince people to buy a new
7
Persuasion and Public Opinion
product. The marketers are consciously working to influence potential customers, knowing that
these customers can change their purchasing decisions based on the campaign's messages and
appeals. This exemplifies the concept of persuasion – a purposeful attempt to modify someone's
thoughts or behaviors. Another example could be a public health campaign encouraging
individuals to quit smoking. The campaign organizers are aware that people can change their
habits, so they use persuasive messages to convince smokers to quit for the sake of their health.
This too showcases the essence of persuasion in prompting behavioral change.
Persuasion hinges on an 'anchor,' which is essentially an existing belief or attitude. These
anchors serve as focal points, driving forces, and important aspects for the people we want to
persuade. Peer pressure and societal norms are two strong influences that act as these belief
anchors. When persuasive communicators recognize and address the values and attitudes of their
audience, it helps establish trust and connection, making their argument more effective (Soules).
For example, imagine a campaign aimed at promoting eco-friendly habits. The persuaders might
tap into the widely held belief in preserving the environment (an anchor) to encourage people to
adopt sustainable practices like recycling. By aligning their message with this existing value,
they make their persuasive argument more compelling and relatable to the audience. People are
often resistant to change, especially when it challenges their existing beliefs. By knowing their
anchor, persuaders can anticipate their objections and address them proactively, making it easier
to overcome resistance. Persuasion campaigns often involves proposing solutions or actions.
Knowing someone's anchor enables persuaders to suggest solutions that align with their values
and beliefs, making them more likely to accept their message. In this way, the belief in
environmental conservation acts as an anchor for the persuasive campaign.
When a persuasive message is created solely to benefit the person or group sending it, it starts to
resemble propaganda or coercion. Propaganda means when a group, often the government or a
big organization, makes a plan to deliberately change what a lot of people think to support their
own goals. It involves ‘systematic and deliberate attempts to sway mass public opinion in favour
of the objectives of the institutions (usually state or corporate) sending the propaganda message’
(Snow 2010: 66).
Persuasion turns into propaganda when it knowingly tricks people or uses their beliefs, values,
and attitudes just to help the person doing the persuading. Sometimes, people might accept a
tricky message if it fits their own needs, like how some folks deny climate change or when
there's talk about the war on terror. But the one spreading the propaganda can't be honest about
what they're really up to. The ‘propagandist cannot reveal the true intent of the message’ (Jowett
and O’Donnell 2006: 38). When people figure out they've been fooled, they feel like they've
been let down and lied to. For instance, think about a company that sells oil. They might run ads
saying that there is no scientific proof for global warming and climate change. But deep down,
they know it's not true. They're just saying it to prevent countries from going green. That's like
moving from persuasion to propaganda. A real life example of propaganda by the U.S.
government relates to the handling of intelligence leading up to the 2003 invasion of Iraq. The
U.S. government, under the administration of President George W. Bush, presented inaccurate or
misleading information about Iraq's possession of weapons of mass destruction as a justification
8
Persuasion and Public Opinion
for military action. This misinformation influenced public opinion and international support for
the war, even though no such weapons were found.
Why do we study persuasion? Importance of Persuasion in our
Daily Lives
A skilled persuader must adeptly analyze their audience to tailor the message effectively. They
identify suitable strategies for the best chance of success. Organizing the persuasive message for
maximum impact is crucial. These are essential abilities for successful persuasion. Yet, the
approach to persuasion also matters. A competent persuader must be seen as using acceptable,
culturally appropriate methods. Understanding social and cultural norms governing persuasion is
essential.
Learning about persuasion enhances effectiveness. Not every persuasion attempt succeeds, but
by understanding social and cultural norms, you can improve your persuasiveness. Moreover,
learning about persuasion expands your understanding of various persuasive processes,
reinforcing the idea that knowledge is empowering. There's immense value in comprehending
how persuasion functions in different contexts.
For example, consider a marketing professional analyzing the preferences and values of their
target audience before designing an advertising campaign. By doing so, they can create ads that
resonate with potential customers, increasing the chances of a successful campaign.
Understanding cultural norms ensures that their messaging is culturally sensitive and respectful.
In a political context, a competent persuader might adapt their messaging to different
demographic groups to garner broader support for a candidate or policy. They would also ensure
that their persuasive techniques align with the cultural values and norms of each group they
target.
Ultimately, knowledge of persuasion provides a powerful tool for anyone seeking to influence
others or navigate persuasive situations effectively.
The importance of persuasion and public opinion lies in their profound influence on how
societies function, evolve, and make decisions. These two concepts are closely related, as
persuasion is often the means through which public opinion is shaped, and public opinion, in
turn, has a significant impact on various aspects of society. Here's a deeper exploration of their
importance and their interconnectedness:
Importance of Persuasion:
1. Communication and Influence: Persuasion is a fundamental tool of communication and
influence. It allows individuals, organizations, and governments to convey their ideas,
beliefs, and messages effectively to others. Whether it's convincing someone to buy a
9
Persuasion and Public Opinion
product, support a political candidate, or adopt a particular viewpoint, persuasion plays a
pivotal role in human interaction.
2. Marketing and Advertising: In the business world, persuasion is essential for marketing
and advertising. Companies use persuasive techniques to promote their products and
services, influencing consumer choices and driving economic activity.
3. Political Decision-Making: Persuasion is at the heart of political campaigns and
policymaking. Political leaders use persuasion to gain support for their policies, win
elections, and shape public opinion on critical issues.
4. Social Change: Advocates for social change rely on persuasion to mobilize support for
various causes, from civil rights movements to environmental activism. Persuasion can
be a catalyst for societal transformation.
Persuasion and its effects on attitude, beliefs and behavior
Persuasion, the art of influencing others' attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors, is an intricate and
pervasive force in our daily lives. The effects of persuasion are profound and far-reaching. It can
alter the way people think, feel, and act. Persuasion can sway political opinions, drive consumer
choices, shape public perception, and mobilize social change. Understanding the mechanisms
behind persuasion and its impact on attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors is crucial in fields ranging
from marketing and politics to psychology and communication studies.
Imagine you're watching a commercial on TV for a new video game. The ad shows exciting
gameplay, cool characters, and promises tons of fun. As you watch, you start feeling excited and
thinking, "I really want to play this game!" That's the power of persuasion.
Marlboro's cigarette advertisements stand as some of the most effective in the history advertising
in the U.S. These campaigns, characterized by the rugged cowboy, picturesque landscapes, and
hard labor, meticulously molded a cigarette's image, contributing to the brand's enduring
popularity among smokers. Smoking Marlboros became intertwined with notions of toughness,
strength, and ruggedness. In essence, the Marlboro campaign upheld cherished American values,
aligning itself with qualities that have long been respected and admired in American society.
The significance of attitudes in comprehending persuasion lies in their role as predictive,
explanatory, and modifiable factors of behavior. Persuaders place heavy reliance on attitudes as
tools for instigating transformations in the individuals they aim to influence. Consequently,
grasping the nature of attitudes serves as a fundamental component in the arsenal of persuasion
techniques.
To illustrate, let's consider a political campaign. If a candidate wants to win an election,
understanding the attitudes of voters toward key issues is vital. This knowledge allows the
candidate to tailor their message and policies in a way that resonates with the electorate's existing
attitudes, increasing the likelihood of their support.
10
Persuasion and Public Opinion
Given this pivotal role, this chapter delves into an exploration of attitudes. We initiate our
examination by elucidating the concept of what constitutes an attitude, recognizing it as a
linchpin in the domain of persuasion, be it for selling products, garnering votes, or engendering
behavioral shifts in various contexts.
An attitude is a mental and emotional evaluation or judgment that an individual holds about a
person, object, group, event, or idea. Attitudes encompass a person's feelings, beliefs, and
predispositions toward the target of their attitude. These evaluations can be positive, negative, or
neutral, and they often influence a person's behavior and decision-making.
A belief is a mental acceptance of something as true or real. It forms the foundation of our
understanding and influences our attitudes and behaviors. Beliefs can be factual, religious, or
value-based, shaping our worldview and guiding our decisions in everyday life.
Values are deeply held principles and standards that shape a person's judgments and behaviors.
They represent what individuals consider most important in life, guiding their moral compass
and influencing decisions. Values encompass concepts like integrity, compassion, and honesty,
serving as a foundation for ethical choices and personal identity.
Example: Healthy Lifestyle:



Attitude: Someone might have a positive attitude toward maintaining a healthy lifestyle.
They view exercise and balanced nutrition as essential components of their daily routine.
Belief: Their belief is that regular exercise and a nutritious diet lead to better physical and
mental health, increased energy, and a longer, more fulfilling life.
Value: Their value system prioritizes well-being, longevity, and the pursuit of an active
and vibrant life. These values guide their attitude and lifestyle choices.
Attitudes are crucial in guiding our behavior in predictable ways. They serve as mental templates
that help us respond to various situations without the need for constant reflection. While attitudes
may not perfectly align with every behavior, there is a substantial correspondence between the
two. For instance, individuals who support gun-control laws are generally less likely to own
firearms compared to those who oppose such regulations. In another example, research has
consistently shown that individuals who express strong pro-environmental attitudes, such as
concern for the planet and support for recycling, are more likely to engage in recycling
behaviors. They are more inclined to separate recyclables from regular waste and participate in
recycling programs, translating their attitudes into eco-friendly actions.
This connection between attitudes and behavior extends to a wide range of actions in our lives.
Studies have shown that attitudes can predict behaviors related to environmental choices,
consumer preferences, voting decisions, contraceptive usage, marijuana consumption, racial
discrimination, and numerous other behaviors. In essence, attitudes serve as valuable indicators
of how individuals are likely to act or respond in specific contexts, making them a central focus
in understanding and influencing human behavior.
11
Persuasion and Public Opinion
Persuaders need to remain attuned to cultural dynamics to enhance the effectiveness of their
persuasive strategies. This necessitates an ongoing process known as culture scanning, which
involves the comprehensive examination of cultural elements, including prevailing trends,
beliefs, values, and behaviors. Culture scanning encompasses more than just public opinion
polling; it extends to a broader analysis of media sources and consumer patterns (Perloff).
For instance, advertisers face the task of comprehending the particulars of the Egyptian
population. To achieve this, they delve into current trends and societal behaviors. This approach
ensures that their products and persuasive tactics align seamlessly with the lives and preferences
of their target audience. In essence, culture scanning is a holistic effort to remain culturally
relevant and to craft persuasive appeals that resonate with the prevailing cultural ethos, keeping
persuasion strategies aligned with the ever-evolving dynamics of society. Consider a company
that manufactures and sells smartphones. To effectively market their products, they engage in
culture scanning to understand current trends and preferences among their target demographic,
which may include tech-savvy young adults.
Through culture scanning, they discover that sustainability and environmental consciousness
have become important values among their target audience. People are increasingly concerned
about the environmental impact of their gadgets. Armed with this cultural insight, the
smartphone company may decide to emphasize the eco-friendly aspects of their products in their
advertising campaigns. They might highlight features like energy efficiency, recyclable
materials, and reduced carbon footprint.
By aligning their marketing strategy with the prevailing cultural trend of environmental
consciousness, the company is more likely to resonate with their audience and persuade them to
choose their product over competitors'. This example illustrates how culture scanning can inform
and shape persuasive strategies to better connect with the values and beliefs of a specific cultural
context.
Our decision-making processes are significantly influenced by the cultural standards and values
prevalent in our society. These cultural norms shape our perceptions of importance, truth, and
value, guiding choices ranging from the cars we drive to our careers and even our fashion
preferences. In essence, culture acts as a compass for our decision-making.
The connection between culture and persuasion operates on multiple levels. Persuaders
thoroughly study culture, aiming to comprehend its nuances and anticipate emerging cultural
trends. By doing so, they position themselves, their ideas, and their products in a manner that
resonates with the prevailing cultural landscape, making their message more relevant to the
audience (Borchers).
For instance, in Egypt, where family values and traditions hold great significance in the culture,
marketers may incorporate these themes into their advertising campaigns. They might feature
family gatherings and traditional celebrations to connect with the audience's cultural values, thus
making their products or services appear more relevant and appealing.
12
Persuasion and Public Opinion
In summary, culture serves as a powerful backdrop that informs our decisions, and persuaders
must navigate and leverage this cultural landscape to effectively communicate and connect with
their audiences.
Culture plays a profound role in shaping the dynamics between persuaders and their audiences.
Beyond surface-level interactions, persuaders also aspire to influence and mold culture itself. It's
essential to recognize that culture is not a fixed entity but a constantly evolving and redefining
force. As cultural norms shift and certain concepts gain acceptance over others, individuals
within society experience shifts in power and influence.
This aspect of culture management becomes a strategic tool in the arsenal of persuaders. By
actively participating in the transformation of cultural narratives and values, persuaders can
create substantial value for their products, services, and ideas.
For example, in the realm of technology, companies like Apple have not only shaped their
products but also the broader culture surrounding technology and design. Their emphasis on
sleek aesthetics and user-friendly interfaces has influenced the entire tech industry, shaping
consumer expectations and preferences.
In essence, persuaders not only navigate culture but actively change it, which, in turn, enables
them to establish value and relevance for their products or ideas within the ever-evolving cultural
landscape.
Our perceptions of credibility are deeply rooted in the cultural ideals and principles we hold.
Culture not only shapes our sense of what is credible but also influences our reasoning processes.
Additionally, our emotions and needs often find their origins in the cultural contexts we belong
to. To help us navigate these intricate relationships between culture and persuasion, we will
begin by defining what culture encompasses. Then, we will explore various aspects of culture,
including its current trends, prevailing beliefs, cherished values, and observable behaviors. This
framework will serve as a valuable tool for discussing and understanding the impact of culture in
various contexts.
Culture is a multifaceted term encompassing the entirety of a society's way of life. This
comprehensive definition includes the beliefs, norms, and values that a group of individuals
develops as they respond to the challenges and requirements of their daily existence. An essential
aspect to understand about culture is that it is not inherent; rather, it is a learned phenomenon.
When we are born, we do not possess an inherent sense of culture; instead, we acquire it through
our interactions with others and our surroundings (Perloff).
The social nature of culture is pivotal in its definition, signifying that it is continually evolving.
The dynamics of culture are determined by the interactions and communications among its
members. As time progresses, a society's beliefs and values evolve to adapt to changing
circumstances. In this transformative process, persuaders play a significant role by influencing
and shaping the course of cultural change. They contribute to the evolving norms and values of a
culture through their persuasive efforts, making them influential agents in the cultural landscape.
13
Persuasion and Public Opinion
Egyptian society is a complex and diverse tapestry that weaves together a multitude of
influences, from its ancient history to modern challenges. It's a society deeply rooted in tradition,
with strong family bonds and a deep respect for elders. At the same time, Egypt is a rapidly
evolving nation, with a significant youth population embracing technological advancements and
social change. Religion, primarily Islam, plays a central role in shaping societal norms and
values. Gender roles can be conservative, with distinct expectations for men and women. The
bustling cities like Cairo and Alexandria stand in stark contrast to the rural communities,
highlighting the diversity within Egyptian society.
Egyptian society has witnessed notable changes in recent years. The Arab Spring in 2011
sparked a wave of activism and political engagement, especially among the youth, demanding
political and social reforms. Rapid urbanization has transformed the demographic landscape,
with more Egyptians moving to urban areas. The proliferation of technology, particularly
smartphones and internet access, has connected people, enabled discourse, and facilitated the
sharing of information. Women's rights and empowerment have gained momentum, although
challenges persist. These shifts reflect a dynamic society navigating the complexities of tradition
and modernity.
People's knowledge, beliefs, and interpretations significantly shape their decisions and
subsequent actions. Persuaders wield substantial influence in shaping people's knowledge,
beliefs, and worldviews. To delve deeper into this connection, we will explore how culture is
expressed through a community's beliefs, values, and behaviors. Understanding these cultural
aspects is pivotal in comprehending how persuasion operates within a society.
Martin Fishbein and Icek Ajzen (1975) present one of the most widely embraced definitions of
attitude: "a learned predisposition to respond in a consistently favorable or unfavorable manner
with respect to an object" (quoted in Perloff, 89). This definition warrants closer examination.
Firstly, attitudes are evaluative; they serve as mechanisms for us to feel or think about an object
in a favorable or unfavorable manner.
Attitudes, at their core, are judgments. When you have an attitude about something, it means
you've sized it up and decided whether it's good or bad, valuable or worthless. Essentially, you're
no longer on the fence about the subject. Your perspective on it has become colored, even if you
have mixed feelings (Perloff).
For example, think about fast food. If you have a positive attitude towards it, you might believe
it's convenient, feel excited about the taste, intend to eat it more often, and actually go to fastfood restaurants frequently. On the other hand, if you have a negative attitude, you might believe
it's unhealthy, feel guilty about indulging, intend to avoid it, and rarely visit fast-food places.
These feelings, thoughts, intentions, and actions all make up your attitude towards fast food. It's
not just about what you think but also how you feel, what you plan to do, and what you actually
do.
Attitudes vary in their strength and stability. Some attitudes are robust and resistant to change,
while others are more flexible and can be influenced by external factors. Moreover, certain
14
Persuasion and Public Opinion
attitudes may contain conflicting or contradictory elements, making them less predictable in their
impact on our thoughts and behaviors (Perloff).
Let's break this down with an example. Imagine two people have attitudes towards
environmental conservation. Person A holds a strong and unwavering belief in the importance of
protecting the environment. They consistently recycle, reduce energy consumption, and actively
support environmental causes. This attitude strongly influences their actions.
In contrast, Person B's attitude towards environmental conservation is weaker. While they
acknowledge the importance of protecting the environment, their behavior is inconsistent. They
may recycle occasionally but not consistently, and their support for environmental causes
fluctuates based on convenience or other factors.
So, attitudes aren't one-size-fits-all; they can range from strong and consistent to weak and
changeable, which affects how they impact our thoughts and behaviors.
Belief, in simple terms, is what we accept as true or real. It's like having a strong feeling that
something is correct or exists, even if we can't always prove it with evidence. Beliefs come from
our experiences, what we've learned, and sometimes, our faith. For instance, if you believe in
honesty as a virtue, it means you think being truthful is important and right. Beliefs can be about
various things: from religious faith to the trust that hard work pays off. They're powerful because
they guide our thoughts, feelings, and actions, influencing how we live our lives.
Beliefs serve as the underpinning for attitudes, forming what can be termed as "knowledge
structures" or "schemas" that exert influence over our decision-making processes. Attitudes, in
essence, constitute a blend of these beliefs along with the significance we attribute to each belief.
They manifest themselves as assessments or opinions regarding a particular matter within our
everyday discussions. In simpler terms, attitudes represent a fusion of our understanding
regarding a subject and the value-based judgments we attach to it (Perloff).
Here are some examples to illustrate the concepts:
1. Belief: "Eating fruits and vegetables is essential for good health."
o Attitude: "I firmly believe in maintaining a balanced diet rich in fruits and
vegetables. They are crucial for staying healthy."
2. Belief: "Climate change is a result of human activities."
o Attitude: "I am deeply concerned about climate change because I believe that
human actions are causing irreversible damage to our planet."
3. Belief: "Education is the key to success."
o Attitude: "I value education highly, and I believe that it is the path to achieving
my goals and securing a better future."
4. Belief: "Helping those in need is a moral duty."
o Attitude: "I hold the belief that it's our responsibility to assist those less fortunate,
and I actively engage in charitable activities to support this principle."
15
Persuasion and Public Opinion
These examples demonstrate how beliefs about health, climate change, education, and social
responsibility can shape one's attitudes and influence their behavior and decision-making.
Values serve as the fundamental principles guiding our lives, encompassing our deeply ingrained
notions of right and wrong. Unlike attitudes and beliefs, values exhibit remarkable stability and
durability. Typically, our value system takes shape during our formative years, influenced by the
cultural, communal, and group associations we encounter. Frequently used terms like "freedom,"
"fairness," "equality," "generosity," and "courtesy" signify primary values, frequently invoked to
justify our attitudes and actions.
While the significance of various values may shift during different life stages, our core values
and moral convictions tend to endure consistently over time. These values not only shape our
personal ethical framework but also play an integral role in steering our actions and influencing
our decisions. For instance, the value of ‘equality’ may drive someone to advocate for social
justice throughout their life, illustrating the enduring nature of core values.
Our inclination to accept or reject a persuasive message and subsequently act on it is intricately
intertwined with the complex interplay of values, attitudes, and beliefs. A significant portion of
our beliefs and values can be considered as the "unexamined inheritances" acquired through our
upbringing in distinct communities and cultures. Despite our rational capacity, we are open to
persuasion when it comes to reevaluating these underlying beliefs and reassessing our
perspectives. Likewise, many of our attitudes have formed with insufficient information and are
subject to modification. Both attitudes and beliefs are relatively straightforward to identify, as
they find expression in our daily conversations. Values, however, are considerably more elusive.
They are less frequently articulated, with some principles guiding our behavior remaining
unnamed and unrecognized. Consequently, values stand as the least amenable to change through
persuasive efforts (Denton 134).
When we bring these components into consideration, we gain insight into how our beliefattitude-value systems significantly influence our everyday decision-making. To begin, this
integrated system plays a pivotal role in shaping our behaviors. As we grapple with people,
ideas, and circumstances, our attitudes guide us toward particular actions and responses, either in
favor of or in opposition to them. In the face of the deluge of information, requests, and
solicitations that inundate us daily, the assessment of each proposal would be an overwhelming
and paralyzing task if we were devoid of any shortcuts. Herein, attitudes function as efficient
shortcuts, drawing upon past experiences to facilitate rapid responses, sparing us the need for
exhaustive cognitive processing to evaluate potential courses of action for each situation (Denton
135).
Furthermore, our value system imparts significance to the world around us by furnishing frames
of reference and norms for accepted conduct. Attitudes serve to establish the "dos" and "don'ts"
that govern our daily lives. Let's consider an example from Egyptian culture to illustrate how
belief-attitude-value systems shape daily decision-making. In Egypt, a deeply ingrained cultural
value is respect for elders and authority figures. This value is reflected in the belief that showing
deference to older individuals and those in positions of authority is not only polite but also
16
Persuasion and Public Opinion
morally virtuous. As a result, many Egyptians hold a strong belief in the importance of obeying
and respecting elders and authority figures.
This belief influences their attitudes and behaviors in various ways. For instance, an Egyptian
individual may have a positive attitude toward helping an elderly person carry their groceries
because it aligns with their belief in showing respect to elders. This positive attitude, in turn,
leads to the behavior of offering assistance when they encounter such a situation.
Additionally, this cultural value can also affect their decision-making in contexts like family
gatherings or workplace interactions. They may be more inclined to listen to and follow the
guidance of older family members or supervisors, as their attitudes are shaped by the underlying
belief in respecting authority.
In this way, the belief-attitude-value system in Egyptian culture influences daily decisions and
behaviors, demonstrating the profound impact of these interconnected elements on individuals'
lives.
To gain a deeper insight into the mechanisms of persuasion, it is essential to comprehend the
roles played by beliefs, attitudes, and values. These internal cognitive constructs are instrumental
in shaping various persuasive outcomes. Consequently, this handout delves into an exploration of
prominent theories that leverage these elements to formulate predictions regarding the processes
and effects of persuasion (Denton 135).
This analytical approach allows us to decipher the intricate interplay between these cognitive
components and their influence on individuals' responses to persuasive messages. By studying
how beliefs, attitudes, and values function within the context of persuasion, we can unlock
valuable insights into why certain persuasion strategies are effective while others are not. Thus,
the subsequent sections of this chapter will provide a comprehensive examination of theories that
illuminate the intricate dynamics of persuasion, shedding light on the underlying processes that
drive human decision-making in response to persuasive communication.
In our exploration of persuasion, we've established a clear definition: persuasion is the process of
crafting messages with the intent to change or reinforce the beliefs, attitudes, or behaviors of the
target audience, which acts autonomously. The most evident proof of successful persuasion
manifests in observable behavior changes. Indeed, the primary objective in most persuasive
endeavors is to encourage individuals to take specific actions. However, it's essential to
recognize that such actions typically follow significant internal shifts in an individual's beliefs or
attitudes. In essence, successful persuasion not only influences what people think or feel but
ultimately leads to tangible, outward actions, with these transformations generally rooted in
significant changes within an individual's internal cognitive landscape (Denton 130).
An essential point to remember is that persuasion goes beyond influencing behavior alone; it
encompasses the alteration of both behavior and the thoughts and attitudes held by individuals.
Reducing persuasion solely to changes in behavior would be an oversimplification. Persuasion
often brings about internal transformations that may not be immediately visible externally.
Additionally, behaviors can sometimes mask underlying conflicting feelings.
17
Persuasion and Public Opinion
Consider this scenario: someone may comply with a friend or spouse's request to attend a concert
or movie, indicating a momentary concession. However, if their underlying attitudes remain
unchanged, their behavior is likely to return to its original state. It's crucial to understand that
compliance and conviction exist on a continuum, with varying degrees of depth and strength.
Both compliance and deep conviction fall within the broad spectrum of our definition of
persuasion (Denton).
Egypt successfully combated female genital mutilation (FGM) through a culturally sensitive
campaign. Acknowledging FGM's cultural significance, they educated communities about its
health risks, involving local leaders and healthcare providers. Empowering women and offering
alternative rites of passage, the campaign emphasized women's health and empowerment. Legal
measures reinforced the message that FGM was illegal and harmful. This approach, tailored to
Egyptian cultural norms and values, led to reduced FGM prevalence, showcasing how persuasive
messages can drive positive behavioral change.
A failed message in Egypt was a Western-style anti-smoking campaign that used graphic images
of smoking-related health issues, aiming to deter smoking. However, it didn't consider Egyptian
cultural attitudes toward smoking. Smoking is deeply ingrained in Egyptian culture, with a high
social acceptance, especially among men. The graphic approach offended many and faced
backlash. This campaign failed to consider the cultural significance of smoking and the
importance of alternative, culturally sensitive messaging. In this case, ignoring Egyptian attitudes
and values resulted in a failed attempt to change behavior.
Compliance often implies that you've successfully influenced someone's behavior to align with
your wishes. For example, when a doctor advises a patient to lose weight or quit smoking, they
monitor whether the patient complies with these recommendations. However, compliance doesn't
necessarily mean the person genuinely likes or believes in the changes they've made. It doesn't
require deep conviction. Conviction, on the other hand, goes much deeper. It signifies the
aspirations of many persuaders who seek genuine agreement and alignment of beliefs from
others. Conviction is the realm where we passionately advocate for our own beliefs. While
creating agreement is valuable, fostering conviction is an even more powerful persuasion
achievement (Denton).
Let's consider an example:
Imagine a public health campaign in Egypt aimed at reducing the consumption of sugary soft
drinks to combat rising obesity rates. The campaign uses advertising and educational programs to
persuade people to cut down on sugary beverages for the sake of their health.
Compliance Scenario: Many individuals may comply with this message by reducing their soft
drink consumption when they see the campaign's persuasive messages. They might do this to
conform to societal norms or because they feel a momentary motivation.
Conviction Scenario: However, achieving true conviction would mean that individuals not only
reduce their soft drink consumption but also genuinely believe that it's essential for their health.
18
Persuasion and Public Opinion
They might become advocates for this cause, educating others about the risks of sugary drinks,
and encouraging their friends and family to make similar changes in their lifestyles. This deep
conviction reflects a more profound level of persuasion, as people are not just complying but
actively promoting the message based on their strong beliefs.
Persuasion can easily stray toward the arts of deception.
Persuasion often flirts with the realm of deception, a fact that both fascinates and disturbs those
who study it. Few questions are more captivating than, "What motivates people to change their
minds or modify their behaviors?" Our innate curiosity drives us to explore how we can
influence and manipulate others and, conversely, how they exert their influence over us.
However, across history, persuasion has sometimes been associated with charlatans and
fraudsters, leaving a negative connotation. Synonyms such as "brainwashing," "subversion,"
"mind control," and "subliminal persuasion" reflect this darker aspect of persuasion. While it can
be a powerful force for good, persuasion's potential for manipulation and deceit cannot be
ignored (Denton 19).
Let's provide examples of persuasion that strayed into the realm of deception:
1. Subliminal Advertising: In the 1950s, there was a controversial episode involving
subliminal advertising. During a screening of the movie "Picnic," a single frame with the
text "Drink Coca-Cola" and "Hungry? Eat Popcorn" was allegedly inserted. The idea was
to influence viewers' choices without their conscious awareness. This sparked outrage
and led to regulations against subliminal advertising.
2. Misleading Political Campaigns: In political campaigns, candidates have been known to
use misleading tactics. For instance, an ad might selectively edit an opponent's speech to
distort their stance on an issue. While not outright lying, it can manipulate perceptions to
deceive voters.
3. Fake News and Social Media Manipulation: In the age of social media, false
information can spread rapidly. During elections, misinformation campaigns might
disseminate fabricated stories or manipulate images to sway public opinion. For example,
during the 2016 U.S. Presidential election, there were numerous instances of fake news
stories designed to influence voters.
4. Miracle Weight-Loss Products: Advertisements for miracle weight-loss products often
exaggerate claims and manipulate before-and-after photos to deceive consumers. While
not directly coercive, these ads prey on people's insecurities and mislead them into
purchasing ineffective products.
These examples demonstrate how persuasion can be used for deceptive purposes, emphasizing
the need for ethical and responsible persuasive practices. Chapter 10 will look at deception and
propaganda in more details.
Persuasion is the art of convincing someone to think, believe, or do something. It's like when you
try to convince your friend to watch your favorite movie, or when a politician tries to get people
19
Persuasion and Public Opinion
to vote for them. Persuasion is all around us, from advertisements and speeches to conversations
with friends.
Effects on Attitudes:
1. Changing Attitudes: Persuasion can change how we feel about something. For example,
a well-made documentary about climate change can make you more concerned about the
environment.
2. Strengthening Attitudes: It can also reinforce our existing attitudes. If you already love
a certain brand of sneakers, seeing a persuasive ad for those sneakers might make you
like them even more.
Effects on Beliefs:
1. Creating New Beliefs: Persuasion can introduce us to new ideas or facts. When you read
a persuasive article about the benefits of healthy eating, it might make you believe that
eating better is a good idea.
2. Challenging Beliefs: Sometimes, persuasion challenges our beliefs. If someone presents
a convincing argument against your favorite video game, you might start to question your
belief in its greatness.
Effects on Behavior:
1. Changing Actions: Persuasion can lead us to take action. For instance, a persuasive
advertisement for a charity might inspire you to donate money or volunteer your time.
2. Maintaining Actions: It can also keep us doing things we already do. If you're persuaded
that brushing your teeth twice a day is essential, you'll likely continue the habit.
Importance of persuasion and public opinion
Public opinion refers to the collective beliefs, attitudes, preferences, and judgments held by a
significant portion of the population on various issues, topics, or matters of societal relevance.
Public opinion is not a uniform or static entity; rather, it can be diverse and subject to change
over time. It is influenced by a wide range of factors, including personal experiences, cultural
values, media exposure, social interactions, and the information available to individuals.
Measuring public opinion often involves conducting surveys, polls, and research to gather data
on what people think and how they feel about specific issues or topics. This information helps
inform public policy, political campaigns, business strategies, and other areas where
understanding the sentiments of the public is essential.
20
Persuasion and Public Opinion
The importance of persuasion and public opinion lies in their profound influence on how
societies function, evolve, and make decisions. These two concepts are closely related, as
persuasion is often the means through which public opinion is shaped, and public opinion, in
turn, has a significant impact on various aspects of society. Here's a deeper exploration of their
importance and their interconnectedness:
Public persuasion involves interactions that affect our entire society. It's about how we
communicate on a big scale, discussing important topics, creating and debating policies, running
for public office, and making positive changes in society. In today's complex world, we can't rely
solely on our individual actions to achieve success or address challenges. Many of the things that
impact our lives require group efforts, where we come together with others to ensure our voices
are heard and our needs are met. When we hear about public campaigns, our minds often go to
political election campaigns. However, public campaigns cover a wide range of issues and social
causes (Denton).
When we think of public campaigns, we might immediately picture political election campaigns,
much like presidential elections in Egypt. However, public campaigns cover a wide range of
issues and social causes. For instance, campaigns in Egypt have promoted public health and
safety by encouraging vaccination during health crises. Others focus on preserving Egypt's
precious historical sites and natural environment. Some campaigns may be controversial, like
debates about the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam's impact on Egypt's water supply, while
others may have unique goals, like preserving traditional Egyptian crafts. Additionally,
marginalized groups in Egypt may run campaigns to gain recognition for their issues, often
overlooked by mainstream society.
In the past twenty years, there has been a massive increase in the number of public opinion polls.
Terms like "margin of error," "sample size," "likely voters," and "favorable approval ratings" are
now commonly used in our national political discussions. These polls do more than just tell us
what people collectively think; they can also try to change our attitudes and actions.
Additionally, they help politicians understand what the public thinks, which can affect the
policies they support. Nowadays, polls are a crucial aspect of news reports, covering everything
from social problems to political campaigns (Denton).
There are various kinds of polls besides the ones you see in the news. Commissioned polls are
done for an organization's benefit, not necessarily for the public to see. These polls help the
organization make decisions. Companies and special-interest groups might commission polls to
see if people trust their product or agree with their stance on an issue. If the results are good,
especially for a special-interest group, they might share them publicly to get more support
(Denton).
For example, a company wants to know how the public perceives their new line of smartphones.
They could commission a poll to gather data on people's opinions about the product's features,
pricing, and overall satisfaction. If the results show that the majority of respondents have a
positive view of their smartphones, the company might release these findings to the public
through advertisements to boost their sales. Let's consider a special interest group advocating for
21
Persuasion and Public Opinion
environmental conservation. They might commission a poll to assess public awareness and
support for policies related to protecting natural habitats. If the poll reveals that a significant
portion of the population is concerned about environmental issues and supports conservation
efforts, the special interest group could release these findings to raise awareness and garner more
public support for their cause.
Political public opinion polls have become really important for elections and the news.
Technology has made these polls more frequent and sophisticated. They're extremely useful for
campaigns because they help figure out who the voters are, what they care about, how they feel,
and how they'll vote. They also help campaigns know which issues matter most to different
groups of voters. Basically, polls tell campaigns what's going on with the voters and what they
should talk about.
Let's look at some examples from Trump's campaign. In 2016, Trump's team used polls to
understand which states were crucial to win. They found that states like Pennsylvania and
Michigan were important, so they focused their efforts there. Polls also helped them figure out
which issues were important to Trump's supporters, like immigration and the economy. This
allowed Trump to tailor his messages to what people cared about most.
Additionally, polls can show a candidate's strengths and weaknesses. If a poll reveals that a
candidate is seen as strong on national security, they might talk more about that in their
campaign. If they're weak on healthcare, they might work on their message in that area.
So, political polls are like a playbook for campaigns, helping them understand voters and run a
better race.
The relationship between persuasion and public opinion
Persuasion and public opinion are intimately connected. Persuasion is the process by which
individuals, institutions, and media attempt to influence public opinion. This can be seen in
various contexts:
1. Media and Advertising: Advertisers use persuasive techniques to shape consumer
preferences and influence public opinion about their products.
2. Political Campaigns: Politicians employ persuasion to sway public opinion in their
favor during election campaigns. This includes crafting persuasive messages, conducting
outreach, and mobilizing voters.
3. Social Movements: Advocacy groups and social movements use persuasion to gain
support for their causes, aiming to shift public opinion on issues like climate change, civil
rights, or healthcare.
4. News and Media: Media outlets and journalists use persuasive writing and storytelling
techniques to present news stories and editorials, which can influence public opinion on
important issues.
22
Persuasion and Public Opinion
In summary, persuasion and public opinion are essential elements of modern society. Persuasion
is the means through which ideas are communicated and beliefs are shaped, while public opinion
reflects the collective attitudes and beliefs of a society. Their interconnectedness underscores
their importance in the realms of politics, economics, social change, and everyday life.
Understanding this relationship is crucial for individuals and institutions seeking to navigate and
influence the complex landscape of contemporary society.
Public persuasion distinguishes itself from interpersonal persuasion by its scale and reach. As the
audience size increases, the complexity of persuasion also grows in order to influence beliefs,
attitudes, and values. Mass persuasion demands a multitude of messages, appeals, and
communication channels. Persuasive campaigns, in this context, are carefully structured
sequences of messages constructed to address these multidimensional requirements. These
messages are tailored to resonate with broad and diverse audiences.
Public opinion represents the shared views of many individuals who are united by common
goals, dreams, needs, and values. While not all issues produce opinions from the entire
population, the crux of any opinion often centers on its significance or how it relates to one's
self-interest. We might express our views on various matters, but only a few truly motivate us to
take action, such as writing a heartfelt letter, participating in a public rally, or contributing to a
cause. To encourage people to engage actively, persuasive appeals and messages frequently
emphasize the shared interests within the group. For instance, consider a campaign to address
environmental concerns. People may hold diverse opinions on the environment, but when a
persuasive message highlights the common interest in protecting the planet for future
generations, it can motivate individuals to join hands in collective action.
Public opinion is reactive and evolves in response to events, which often serve as catalysts
shaping the collective opinions of a community. For instance, consider the issue of women's
rights in Egypt. Over the years, there has been a growing public opinion and awareness about the
importance of gender equality. Women's rights activists have been using social media and public
campaigns to raise awareness about issues like gender-based violence and workplace
discrimination. This has led to more people supporting these causes and taking action to promote
women's rights. Public opinion doesn't predict what will happen; it reacts to social issues and
movements, influencing positive change in society.
Social issues often remain unnoticed until a significant event thrusts them into the spotlight.
When people become aware of these issues and begin discussing them, it can lead to the
formation of strong opinions and attitudes. However, even compelling events usually don't
permanently change how the public feels.
Consider the case of Egypt's "Me Too" movement. For years, issues related to sexual harassment
and gender inequality simmered beneath the surface. Then, a series of high-profile incidents and
courageous individuals coming forward to share their stories brought these problems to public
attention. This led to extensive discussions and activism, resulting in a shift in public opinion
regarding the importance of addressing gender-based issues.
23
Persuasion and Public Opinion
Public opinion is influenced by a complex web of cultural factors and institutions. In a broader
sense, a campaign refers to a well-planned series of actions aimed at achieving a specific
outcome. It involves careful planning, strategic moves, competition, and outcomes that affect
both winners and losers.
Herbert Simons defines persuasive campaigns as “organized, sustained attempts at influencing
groups or masses of people through a series of messages” (quoted in Denton 229). This
definition highlights three important aspects of persuasive campaigns. Firstly, campaigns are not
spontaneous events; they are carefully planned with a clear organizational structure that includes
leaders, goals, and established routines. Campaigns typically have specific start and end dates.
The second significant characteristic of a campaign is its large audience size. As we've discussed
before, this size greatly affects how messages are designed and delivered. It also means that mass
communication media are often used to reach these audiences effectively. Lastly, persuasive
campaigns involve the use of multiple messages. These messages are crafted to change the
beliefs, attitudes, values, or behaviors of a particular segment of the general public. In essence,
they aim to bring about a specific change within a larger audience (Denton).
Public persuasion campaigns are essentially communication efforts related to politics (which can
include elections or large social movements), various topics, products, and services.
Types of Campaigns covered in this course
Product or Commercial Advertising Campaigns
The aim of product or commercial advertising campaigns is to promote and sell specific ideas,
products, or services to the public. Advertising is one of the most widespread forms of
persuasion in many countries because it constantly surrounds us.
For example, consider Coca-Cola's advertising campaigns. They don't just sell soda; they sell the
idea of happiness and refreshment. Through catchy ads and slogans, they persuade consumers to
associate their product with positive feelings and experiences.
Public Relations Campaigns
In simple terms, public relations campaigns aim to tackle an issue, solve a problem, or make a
situation better. According to Doug Newsom, Judy Turk, and Dean Kruckeberg, there are six
types of public relations campaigns (298).
24
Persuasion and Public Opinion
1. Public Awareness Campaigns: These are designed to inform people about something,
like the opening date of a new school or a local community event. For instance, a
campaign might inform citizens about an upcoming blood donation drive in their town.
2. Public Information Campaigns: These go beyond awareness and provide crucial
information. An example is a campaign that not only tells people about a new law but
also explains its implications and how it affects them, like tax reforms.
3. Public Education Campaigns: These campaigns take an extra step by not only making
people aware but also helping them understand how the information applies to their daily
lives. For instance, a campaign about healthy eating might educate the public about the
nutritional value of various foods.
4. Attitude Reinforcement Campaigns: These campaigns target those who already agree
with the goals or values of an organization. An example is a campaign by an
environmental group that encourages people to continue supporting clean energy
initiatives if they already have a positive attitude toward sustainability.
5. Attitude Change Campaigns: These aim to change the attitudes of those who disagree
with a particular goal or value. For instance, anti-smoking campaigns strive to alter the
attitudes of people who currently smoke.
6. Behavior Modification Campaigns: These are the most challenging because they seek
to motivate people to change their current behavior. Examples include campaigns against
drug abuse, smoking cessation, and drunk driving prevention, which aim to either
reinforce existing healthy behaviors or encourage individuals to adopt new, safer
behaviors.
Social Media Campaign
Social media campaigns are coordinated marketing or advocacy efforts that leverage various
social media platforms to achieve specific goals. These campaigns are designed to engage,
inform, and interact with a target audience through social media channels. Social media
campaigns can serve various purposes, including marketing products or services, promoting
causes, raising awareness, mobilizing support, and more.
Political Campaigns
Political campaigns are organized and strategic efforts undertaken by individuals, political
parties, or interest groups to achieve specific political goals. These campaigns are most
commonly associated with elections, where candidates seek to win public office, but they can
also focus on advocating for specific policies, raising awareness about political issues, or
influencing public opinion.
Social Issue/Advocacy Campaigns
Although related to political campaigns, issue campaigns attempt to get audiences
to support a certain course of action or belief independent of official political structures,
25
Persuasion and Public Opinion
systems, or procedures. Organizations generating such campaigns include political
action committees, religious organizations, schools, and hospitals, to name only a few.
Campaigns range from specific lobbying efforts to general public awareness campaigns.
The Persuasive Communication Triangle
Effective campaigns employ persuasive techniques that lead audiences to naturally and
intuitively align with the persuader's viewpoint. Initially, audience members might hold different
beliefs, but exposure to the message prompts them to reconsider, often feeling like they arrived
at the new perspective independently. Unlike coercion, where individuals change due to
perceived threats or force, persuasion typically involves individuals convincing themselves
willingly. While we may perceive persuasive communication as a product of the modern era, its
origins trace back to ancient times, notably during the era of Greek philosophers who delved into
rhetoric—the art of persuasion. Thus, the roots of persuasive communication extend far beyond
contemporary mass communication, reaching back to the foundational studies of ancient scholars
like Aristotle and Plato (Pavlik).
The Persuasive Communication Triangle is a concept used to illustrate the three key elements
involved in persuasive communication: the speaker (or sender), the message, and the audience
(or receiver). These elements work together to influence and persuade individuals or groups.
Here's a breakdown of each element:
1. Speaker (Sender): This represents the person or entity delivering the persuasive
message. The speaker plays a crucial role in establishing credibility and trust with the
audience. If the audience does not perceive the speaker as credible, the persuasive
message is less likely to be effective. Factors such as expertise, authority, and likability
can influence the speaker's credibility.
2. Message: The message is the content and structure of what is being communicated. It
includes the arguments, evidence, emotional appeals, and overall presentation used to
persuade the audience. The message should be tailored to the audience's needs, values,
and interests to maximize its persuasive impact.
3. Audience (Receiver): The audience represents the individuals or group of people
receiving the persuasive message. Understanding the audience's demographics, beliefs,
attitudes, and motivations is essential for effective persuasion. Persuaders must adapt
their message and delivery to resonate with the specific audience they are addressing.
The Persuasive Communication Triangle emphasizes the interconnectedness of these three
elements. Effective persuasion requires alignment between the speaker, message, and audience.
The speaker's credibility must match the message's content and appeal to the audience's needs
and preferences. When these elements are in harmony, persuasive communication is more likely
to succeed.
26
Persuasion and Public Opinion
This concept is widely used in fields such as marketing, advertising, public relations, and
political communication to craft persuasive campaigns that resonate with target audiences. It
serves as a framework for analyzing and optimizing persuasive efforts.
Rhetoric, considered one of the fundamental areas of knowledge in classical education alongside
logic and grammar, remains highly relevant today. The three core components of rhetoric—
audience, author, and text—continue to serve as valuable concepts when crafting persuasive
messages. It's important to note that the term "text" doesn't solely refer to written content,
although it can encompass that. Instead, it encompasses any medium employed to convey a
message. This could be a movie, a podcast, a visual image, or even the arrangement of a
classroom desk (Pavlik, 253). The author represents the creator of this "text," while the audience
comprises those who receive and engage with it.
Source: Pavlik 253
Persuasion is fundamentally about conveying a message, and this message can take various
forms. It might be expressed through words or nonverbal cues, and it has the potential to reach us
through different channels such as interpersonal conversations, mass media, or the vast realm of
social networking sites. The nature of the message can be diverse; it may be based on rational
arguments or designed to evoke strong emotional responses. Sometimes, persuasion hinges on
subtle cues, like the use of music in an advertisement that triggers pleasant memories. In essence,
persuasion is an act of communication, and for persuasion to take place, there must be a message
conveyed (Perloff 26).
Beyond the conventional arenas that come to mind when thinking of persuasion, like advertising,
political campaigns, and one-on-one sales interactions, there are other domains where messages
shape and sway attitudes. Notably, news media plays a pivotal role in shaping our beliefs and
opinions, further highlighting the pervasive influence of persuasion in our lives.
27
Persuasion and Public Opinion
Chapter Two: The Psychology of Persuasion
Theories of Persuasion and Public Opinion
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
After reading this chapter, you should be
able to:

Identify the aspects of Aristotelian theory
that are the foundations for current
persuasive theory.

Have a basic understanding of popular
theories of persuasion.
In our fast-paced, interconnected world, the ability to influence opinions, shape public attitudes,
and drive collective behaviors is more coveted and complex than ever before. Within the realm
of communication and sociology, theories of persuasion and public opinion have emerged as
invaluable tools for understanding the mechanisms that underlie the art and science of influence.
In this chapter, we embark on a journey through some of the most influential and illuminating
theories that shed light on how ideas spread, opinions are formed, and societies evolve.
The theories explored here serve as compasses guiding us through the intricate terrain of
persuasion and public opinion. Each theory offers a unique perspective, unveiling the hidden
forces that drive human decision-making and revealing the strategies that impact the formation
and dissemination of public beliefs. Among the theories that we will delve into are the Theory of
Social Judgment, the Diffusion of Innovation Theory, and the Elaboration Likelihood Model
(ELM). These theories, while distinct in their approaches, converge to provide a comprehensive
framework for understanding the intricate interplay between persuasion and public opinion.
As we traverse these theories, we will uncover their practical applications in diverse contexts,
ranging from marketing and advertising to political communication and social movements. We
will consider their implications for the ethical use of persuasion and explore the ways in which
these theories contribute to the development of informed, responsible, and critical citizens in an
increasingly persuasive world.
28
Persuasion and Public Opinion
The theories outlined in this chapter represent the foundational concepts frequently employed in
the examination of persuasion. As you progress in your exploration of persuasion throughout this
course, these fundamental theories will serve as valuable reference points, enhancing your
comprehension of the mechanisms underlying persuasive processes.
Early Rhetorical Theory: Aristotle’s Primary Pillars of Persuasive
Appeals
The field of communication studies traces its origins to ancient times, with Aristotle's renowned
work "Rhetoric" being a cornerstone in the study of public speaking. Aristotle, often regarded as
a pioneering figure in communication theory, crafted the earliest comprehensive theory of
persuasion. His fundamental insight centered around the concept of "artistic proofs," which
persuaders could intentionally employ to elicit specific responses from their audience. In
contrast, "inartistic proofs" encompass external factors that contribute to persuasion but are
beyond the persuader's control, such as the setting or the speaker's physical attractiveness.
Aristotle's enduring legacy in persuasion theory revolves around three primary artistic proofs:
ethos, pathos, and logos, which continue to shape contemporary perspectives on persuasive
communication.
Logos.
Aristotle's third persuasion technique, known as logos, revolves around appealing to logic and
reason. This approach assumes that humans are rational beings who carefully analyze facts and
information before making decisions. However, it's crucial to recognize that effective use of
logos relies on the audience's ability to understand and process the presented information as
intended by the communicator.
Logos primarily involves presenting well-structured, factual arguments supported by credible
evidence from reliable sources. This evidence can take various forms, such as statistics,
eyewitness statements, testimonials, or opinions from authoritative figures. The key to persuasive
logos lies in attributing the evidence to highly credible sources. It's not enough to merely
mention evidence; the audience must acknowledge that it has been provided to support a specific
argument and perceive it as trustworthy (Borchers).
For example, suppose you aim to launch a campaign using logos to improve Egyptians' attitude
toward a particular social issue, like environmental conservation. You would first identify
common misconceptions or beliefs that hinder support for environmental initiatives. Then, you'd
gather information and data to counter these beliefs, highlighting, for instance, that
environmental conservation efforts have led to tangible improvements in local communities and
emphasizing endorsements from respected environmental organizations. This evidence-based
approach would appeal to the logical reasoning of the Egyptian audience, encouraging them to
reconsider their attitudes toward environmental conservation
29
Persuasion and Public Opinion
For instance, if you aim to create a campaign rooted in logos to positively influence how
Americans perceive their fellow Muslim citizens, you would begin by examining existing beliefs
or misconceptions that some Americans might hold regarding American Muslims. These
misconceptions might include unfounded beliefs that they support extremist groups like ISIS or
don't abide by American laws.
To effectively employ logos in your campaign, you would then gather credible information and
evidence to challenge these misconceptions. For instance, you could present data demonstrating
that the vast majority of American Muslims unequivocally reject extremist ideologies such as
those promoted by ISIS. Additionally, you might highlight statistics indicating their strong
commitment to obeying American laws and actively participating in U.S. institutions.
By marshaling these facts and statistics, your campaign would logically demonstrate that the
prevailing negative stereotypes about American Muslims are unfounded. This evidence-based
approach aims to appeal to the rational thinking of the American audience, encouraging them to
reassess their attitudes and perceptions of their Muslim fellow citizens based on accurate
information.
Ethos.
Ethos, one of Aristotle's key modes of persuasion, revolves around the appeal to ethics and
credibility. In persuasive communication, ethos seeks to establish the speaker as a trustworthy
and credible source of information. Ethos plays a crucial role in persuasion by focusing on the
speaker's character, expertise, and trustworthiness. It is about establishing a strong connection
with the audience based on the perception that the speaker is a credible and ethical source of
information or guidance.
For example, consider a health expert delivering a public service announcement about the
importance of vaccination during a disease outbreak. The expert begins by sharing their
credentials, such as being a renowned epidemiologist with years of experience. They also
emphasize their dedication to public health and their commitment to providing accurate
information. By doing so, they establish their credibility in the eyes of the audience. As a result,
the audience is more likely to trust the expert's advice and follow their recommendation to get
vaccinated.
In this example, the use of ethos helps to build trust and confidence in the speaker's expertise and
integrity. It's a vital element of persuasion, especially when the audience needs assurance that the
information or guidance being presented is reliable and well-founded.
Pathos
Pathos is a persuasive technique that speaks directly to the emotions of the audience.
Aristotle recognized the power of emotions in persuasion. To employ pathos effectively,
persuaders use emotionally charged language, compelling narratives, and vivid imagery. By
30
Persuasion and Public Opinion
connecting with the audience's values, beliefs, and experiences, pathos seeks to create a deep
emotional resonance. Whether in advertising, speeches, or storytelling, it aims to evoke empathy,
sympathy, or other emotions that can lead individuals to align with the persuader's message.
Pathos is a potent tool in shaping attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors by appealing directly to the
heart (Borchers).
To effectively use pathos, persuasive communicators must consider three essential questions
about the audience's emotions:
1. What is the audience's current emotional state? Understanding the emotional
backdrop of the audience is crucial. Are they happy, fearful, sympathetic, or indifferent?
The emotional context greatly influences how the message should be framed.
2. Against whom are the audience's emotions directed? Identifying the target of the
audience's emotions is essential. Are their emotions directed toward a particular issue, a
group, or a situation? Knowing this helps in crafting a message that resonates with their
emotional concerns.
3. Why do audience members feel the way they do? Delving into the reasons behind the
audience's emotions is key. What has led them to feel a certain way? What experiences or
beliefs are driving their emotions? Understanding these underlying factors allows
persuaders to address them effectively.
Now, let's consider an example from Egypt to illustrate the concept of pathos in persuasion.
Suppose a nonprofit organization in Egypt is running a campaign to raise funds for
underprivileged children's education. To appeal to the emotions (pathos) of the Egyptian
audience, they might showcase heartwarming stories of children who have overcome
adversity through education. These stories could depict young students from disadvantaged
backgrounds achieving academic success and pursuing their dreams. By evoking emotions
like sympathy, hope, and a desire to make a difference, the campaign aims to persuade
Egyptians to contribute to the cause. In this context, the organization is using pathos to
connect with the audience's emotions, making them more receptive to the message and
encouraging them to take action by supporting the education of underprivileged children.
In another example of pathos in persuasion:
Imagine a charity organization seeking donations for famine relief in Africa. They create a
persuasive advertisement featuring heart-wrenching images of malnourished children, their
tearful mothers, and barren landscapes. The advertisement uses emotive language and a poignant
soundtrack to evoke feelings of compassion and sympathy in the audience.
By strategically employing pathos, this charity hopes to connect with the viewers on an
emotional level. They aim to make the audience feel the suffering of those affected by the famine
deeply. Consequently, viewers may be more inclined to donate money or support the cause
because they've been emotionally moved by the message.
31
Persuasion and Public Opinion
When we think about a persuader's message, our emotions come into play. Our feelings,
needs, and values affect how we connect with a persuader's ideas. Persuaders are aware of this
and create messages to tap into our emotions. Aristotle noted that people judge ideas differently
when they're happy compared to when they're sad. This means persuaders can change how an
audience feels about a topic by using their emotions. Today, the study of emotions includes
various feelings-based ideas, like psychological needs and values. Researchers call these ideas
motivational appeals because they motivate people to act or think in certain ways. So, when
we're persuaded, our emotions and what we care about deeply play a big role in our decisions
(Borchers).
Persuaders use motivational appeals in various ways today. They aim to create connections with
their audience by appealing to their emotions. For instance, in politics, candidates strive to gain
the trust of voters. In advertising, brand names like Apple or Nike evoke positive emotions
towards products. Organizations encourage interaction among members to foster comfort with
their values and mission. Additionally, persuaders leverage informal electronic communication
to build intimate connections with us.
On a deeper level, persuaders influence our emotions, needs, and values. They shape our
perception of what's important or desirable, and we internalize these feelings, which, in turn,
guide our actions. For instance, they've led us to believe that having a beautiful home and garden
is crucial. When we adopt this belief, we might purchase home improvement magazines, shop at
high-end stores, and use fossil fuel-powered equipment for landscaping. This illustrates how our
emotions are interconnected with a complex web of influences and pressures that often go
unnoticed (Borchers).
Consumers started connecting products with imagined states of existence. Instead of providing
just information, advertisers began selling feelings. For instance, they promoted the sensation of
speed rather than focusing on a specific car brand. Similarly, they emphasized style over
particular clothing items. This shift in advertising aimed to evoke emotions and associations
related to the product, making consumers feel a certain way when using or purchasing it. For
example, an ad for a luxury car might focus on the feeling of sophistication and success that
owning the car can bring, rather than simply listing its technical specifications. This emotional
connection with products became a powerful tool for advertisers to influence consumer choices.
Aristotle, an ancient Greek philosopher, initiated the study of persuasion, and his theories have
remained relevant for centuries, forming the foundation of contemporary research in persuasion.
His concepts of ethos (credibility), pathos (emotional appeals), and logos (logical appeals) have
significantly contributed to our comprehension of audience influence and effective persuasion
techniques that are still applied today.
32
Persuasion and Public Opinion
Social Judgement Theory
The theory of social judgment, a crucial concept in persuasion, revolves around how people
perceive and evaluate persuasive messages. Developed by psychologist Muzafer Sherif in the
1960s, this theory posits that individuals possess a range of pre-existing attitudes, beliefs, and
opinions on various issues, forming a "latitudinal zone" within which they accept or reject new
information.
The importance of the social judgment theory in persuasion lies in its ability to explain the
process through which people process and respond to persuasive messages. It helps us
understand that individuals tend to anchor their judgments around their pre-existing beliefs,
categorizing new information into one of three categories: the "acceptance" region (where the
message aligns with their current beliefs), the "rejection" region (where the message contradicts
their existing beliefs), and the "non-commitment" region (where the message falls in between,
prompting neutrality or indecision).
By recognizing these judgment latitudes, persuaders can tailor their messages to effectively
target the audience's pre-existing attitudes, attempting to shift them incrementally towards the
desired position. Understanding how individuals perceive and process information within their
judgment zones is essential for crafting persuasive messages that resonate and drive attitude and
behavior change.
At the heart of this theory lies the notion that people have varying degrees of acceptance
or resistance to persuasive messages, with their existing attitudes acting as the anchor. Through
the Theory of Social Judgment, we explore how individuals categorize incoming information,
assess its alignment with their existing beliefs, and decide whether to accept, reject, or remain
neutral toward persuasive appeals. This theory equips us with insights into the delicate balance
between conformity and individuality within the sphere of public opinion.
Social Judgment theory helps us understand how individuals make decisions based on the
messages they receive. It suggests that people mentally organize information by comparing it to
what they already know. For example, they might rank things from most important to least
important or from most enjoyable to least enjoyable. This helps them process new information.
So, when someone hears a new message, they judge it based on their existing beliefs and
knowledge. If it aligns with what they already think, they are more likely to accept it. If it
contradicts their beliefs, they might reject it. Social Judgment theory helps us predict how people
will react to different messages by considering this mental sorting process (Wahl 49)
33
Persuasion and Public Opinion
Source: Wahl 50
Previous beliefs or attitudes are called anchors. Anchors are like our starting points for beliefs
and attitudes, and everything new we come across gets compared to them. Imagine anchors as
the reference points from which we judge all other ideas and information. Around these anchors,
we have different categories that help us decide how likely we are to accept a new idea. It's kind
of like sorting things into folders based on how much they match with what we already believe
(Wahl 49).
For example, think about someone in Egypt who has a strong belief in traditional farming
methods. That belief is their anchor when it comes to agriculture. Now, if they hear about a new,
modern farming technique, they'll judge it based on how well it aligns with their traditional
beliefs. If it fits closely, they might be more open to trying it. If it's too different, they might
reject the idea because it doesn't match their anchor of traditional farming practices
Imagine you have three zones when you hear about new ideas. The first is your comfort zone,
where you're most likely to say, "Yeah, that makes sense." This is called the latitude of
acceptance (LOA), and it's closest to your beliefs, like your anchor.
Then there's the "No way, I don't buy it" zone. This is the latitude of rejection (LOR), and it's
farthest from your anchor, where ideas just don't click with what you believe.
Lastly, there's the middle zone, where you're not entirely sure yet. You're open to thinking about
it more before deciding. This is the latitude of non-commitment (LON), and it's right in
between the "accept" and "reject" zones.
To effectively persuade, it's crucial to grasp the audience's belief ranges and aim to shift their
existing opinions. Sherif's insights suggest that one way to achieve this is by assessing an
individual's ego involvement, which relates to how significant an issue is in their life. High ego
involvement signifies that the matter is deeply connected to a person's identity, values, and
beliefs. In cases of high ego involvement, the latitude of acceptance is minimal, and the latitude
of rejection is expansive. To sway individuals with high ego involvement, persuasive messages
must align precisely with the very edges of their acceptance range. This implies that only a very
narrow set of viewpoints will be embraced, making it challenging to change their attitudes
(Wahl).
34
Persuasion and Public Opinion
Case Study: Overpopulation advocacy campaign in Egypt
Let's consider an overpopulation advocacy campaign in Egypt that aims to raise awareness
about the challenges associated with overpopulation and encourage family planning.
1. Latitude of Acceptance (LOA): Individuals who are already aware of the
overpopulation issue and support family planning methods would fall into the latitude
of acceptance. They are likely to respond positively to the campaign's message, as it
aligns with their existing beliefs and values. The message might reinforce their
commitment to responsible family planning and encourage them to advocate for it in
their communities.
2. Latitude of Rejection (LOR): On the other hand, individuals who have strong cultural
or religious beliefs against contraception and family planning might place the
campaign's message in the latitude of rejection. They could perceive family planning as
contrary to their cultural or religious values, leading to strong resistance. For them, the
message might fall far from their anchor beliefs.
3. Latitude of Non-commitment (LON): People who are not well-informed about
overpopulation or have never deeply considered family planning might place the
campaign's message in the latitude of non-commitment. They may be open to learning
more but are not yet convinced. This group represents an opportunity for the campaign
to provide information and engage in further discussions, moving them closer to the
latitude of acceptance.
Understanding these three latitudes allows the advocacy campaign to tailor its messages
effectively. For those in the latitude of acceptance, messages can focus on reinforcement and
encouraging active involvement in advocating for responsible family planning. For those in
the latitude of non-commitment, the campaign can provide educational content to shift them
toward acceptance. Addressing the concerns of those in the latitude of rejection may require a
more nuanced approach, perhaps involving community leaders and religious figures to
facilitate dialogue and bridge the gap between cultural values and family planning.
For a passionate environmentalist who has dedicated their life to advocating for sustainable
living practices and controlling overpopulation, the issue of overpopulation is of extremely
high ego involvement. It's not just a cause they support; it's a core part of their identity, values,
and beliefs. As a result, their latitude of acceptance regarding messages related to
overpopulation is quite narrow.
Now, if someone were to present a message advocating for less strict population control
measures, it would likely fall far outside the latitude of acceptance for this individual. They
might perceive such a message as a direct challenge to their deeply held beliefs and identity,
causing a strong rejection response. In this case, persuading them to change their attitude
toward overpopulation and accept less strict measures would be exceptionally challenging due
to their high ego involvement in the issue.
35
Persuasion and Public Opinion
High and low ego involvement refer to the degree of personal attachment or emotional
investment an individual has in a particular issue, activity, or cause. These concepts help us
understand how important and central a specific topic is to someone's identity, values, or selfconcept.
High Ego Involvement:



Definition: High ego involvement signifies that a person is deeply committed to or
identifies strongly with a particular issue, cause, or activity.
Characteristics: Individuals with high ego involvement often consider the issue as an
integral part of their identity. They are emotionally attached and have a strong sense of
personal connection to it.
Example - Community Service: Let's say Jane has been actively involved in community
service for years. She volunteers regularly at a local shelter, organizes charity events, and
has built her social circle around fellow volunteers. Community service is not just an
activity for her; it's a significant part of her life. Jane has high ego involvement in
community service because it's closely tied to her sense of self, values, and social
identity.
Low Ego Involvement:



Definition: Low ego involvement indicates that a person has a lesser personal attachment
or emotional investment in a specific issue, cause, or activity.
Characteristics: Individuals with low ego involvement may engage in the issue or
activity, but it doesn't define their identity or values to the same extent as those with high
ego involvement.
Example - Community Service: Consider John, who occasionally volunteers at local
events or community projects when he has some free time. While he believes in helping
others and values community service, it doesn't dominate his life or shape his identity.
John has low ego involvement in community service because it's not deeply intertwined
with his sense of self or personal values.
Understanding ego involvement is crucial for organizations, causes, and persuasive
communicators as it influences how individuals respond to messages and calls to action. Those
with high ego involvement may be more resistant to change, while those with low ego
involvement may be more open to persuasion and behavior modification.
Understanding the audience's ranges and effectively persuading them involves assessing their
ego involvement in a particular issue. Ego involvement measures how deeply an issue is
connected to a person's identity and values. For highly ego-involved individuals, the latitude of
acceptance is quite narrow, making it challenging to change their opinions. To reach them,
persuasive messages should carefully align with the very edge of their acceptance range.
Conversely, when dealing with issues of low ego involvement, the latitude of noncommitment
expands while the latitudes of acceptance and rejection shrink. These issues are less connected to
personal identity or values, making it easier to persuade individuals to change their opinions.
36
Persuasion and Public Opinion
However, it's essential to note that attitudes formed on such issues may also be more prone to
change in the future (Wahl 50).
"Ego involvement" plays a pivotal role in persuasion, determining how strongly anchored our
opinions are to our self-image. When we encounter attitudes that contrast with our own, we
perceive them as distant from our anchor points. Conversely, when attitudes align with ours, we
assimilate them, seeing them as closer to our anchor points.
For most issues, there exists a spectrum of positions that people may accept. Persuasion is most
effective when messages fall within the audience's latitude of acceptance. However, the success
of persuasion also depends on the individual's motivation to consider the message.
On the other hand, the latitude of rejection encompasses positions that are entirely unacceptable.
Messages within this zone rarely lead to attitude change and often trigger the opposite effect,
reinforcing existing attitudes – known as the boomerang effect.
Source: Denton, 148.
Social judgment theory offers significant insights into the dynamics of persuasion. Its central
prediction is that individuals evaluate new ideas or positions based on their pre-existing beliefs,
which act as anchor points. Trying to persuade someone to adopt a viewpoint vastly different
from their anchor position is an arduous task, often verging on the impossible. Essentially,
37
Persuasion and Public Opinion
people have a cognitive bias to accept information that aligns closely with their existing beliefs
(Gass)
One of the key takeaways from social judgment theory is that effective persuasion is not
typically achieved in a single attempt. Instead, it's a process that unfolds over time. This concept
emphasizes the need for patience and a gradual approach when trying to change someone's
viewpoint. To illustrate, let's say you're attempting to convince a friend who strongly opposes the
idea of space exploration that investing in space research has significant benefits. Instead of
presenting an extreme viewpoint, you might start by highlighting the practical applications of
space technology on Earth. As your friend becomes more open to these ideas, you can gradually
introduce more far-reaching concepts, like the potential for human colonization of other planets.
In essence, social judgment theory underscores the importance of a nuanced, gradual persuasion
strategy when dealing with individuals whose beliefs are firmly anchored in a particular position
(Gass).
Elaboration Likelihood Theory
Within the realm of persuasion, not all messages are processed equally. The Elaboration
Likelihood Model (ELM) explores how individuals engage with persuasive messages,
distinguishing between two routes of processing: the central route (involving careful analysis and
consideration) and the peripheral route (relying on cues and heuristics). ELM illuminates the
factors that determine which route is taken and how message elaboration influences the
formation and persistence of attitudes and beliefs.
The Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM) presents a comprehensive theoretical framework for
explaining the influence of various elements pertaining to the source, message, and recipient on
the process of persuasion. Within this model, it is theorized that individuals engage in two
distinct modes of processing when confronted with persuasive communications. These modes are
referred to as "routes," symbolizing separate cognitive pathways within the human mind that
facilitate the transportation of thoughts and reactions to incoming messages. The ELM
distinguishes between these two routes as the "central" and "peripheral" routes to persuasion,
signifying the different avenues through which individuals assess and respond to persuasive
messages (Perloff).
There are two main ways people react to persuasive messages: the central route and the
peripheral route. The central route involves deep thinking. People using this route carefully
consider the arguments, think about what the speaker is saying, and relate it to what they already
know and believe. It's the route for people who like to think things through.
On the other hand, the peripheral route is quite different. Instead of digging deep into the
arguments, people using this route quickly judge the message or rely on simple things to decide
if they agree with it. They might look at the speaker's appearance, how smoothly they talk, or
whether there's nice music in the background. It's like a shortcut to forming an opinion.
38
Persuasion and Public Opinion
These two routes show how we process persuasive information: one involves a lot of thinking,
while the other is more about surface-level cues (Perloff).
The two routes to persuasion, the central and peripheral routes, involve different ways of
processing information. The central route requires deep thinking and evaluation of message
arguments. It's like the route for thoughtful decision-makers. On the other hand, the peripheral
route is about quick judgments based on surface-level cues, like the spokesperson's appeal,
background music, or flashy visuals.
Let's take a car commercial as an example. In such commercials, you often get both logical
information about the car's features and peripheral cues like exciting visuals and music. When
you watch this ad, whether you pay attention to the logical details depends on your motivation
and ability.
Motivation is influenced by how relevant the information is to you. For example, if you're
looking for an affordable car, you'll focus on price and gas mileage. If you have a family, safety
features might matter more. Ability, on the other hand, is about whether you can understand the
technical information presented. If terms like "V-6, dual-overhead-cam" are confusing, you
might switch to the peripheral route (Borshers 53).
In simpler terms, the peripheral route to persuasion leans on aspects like the person delivering
the message, the background music, or attention-grabbing visuals. Let's illustrate this with a
televised laptop commercial, where you can spot elements catering to both the central and
peripheral routes.
In this laptop ad, you'll often encounter a blend of strategies. On one hand, you'll receive factual
information about the laptop's specifications, such as its processing speed and memory capacity,
appealing to your analytical thinking through the central route. Meanwhile, you'll also notice
peripheral cues like the sleek design of the laptop, the upbeat background music, and perhaps an
enthusiastic celebrity endorsement. These peripheral elements aim to catch your eye and create a
positive emotional response.
So, as you watch this commercial, you're essentially witnessing how both central and peripheral
routes work hand in hand to shape your perception of the laptop and potentially influence your
decision to buy it.
39
Persuasion and Public Opinion
Source: Borchers 52
Petty and Cacioppo (1986) propose that when persuasion occurs through deep thinking or the
central route, the resulting attitude changes are more lasting compared to those influenced by
superficial factors or the peripheral route. These attitudes changed through deep thinking are also
more resistant to being swayed by future messages.
The reason for this durability is that attitude changes via the central route involve a lot more
mental effort. When people engage in central-route processing, they carefully assess new
40
Persuasion and Public Opinion
information in comparison to what they already know to be true before adopting these new
perspectives.
When processing information peripherally, people often rely on simple decision-making
shortcuts or heuristics. For instance, someone might use the heuristic that "experts are
trustworthy" and, based solely on this, accept the speaker's recommendation. Similarly,
individuals might employ a "bandwagon heuristic," believing that "if many others like
something, it must be good."
These principles have intriguing implications in the realm of social media. For example,
individuals may perceive a Facebook post as appealing because it has numerous "likes," or they
might endorse a tweet because it has many retweets. Similarly, people might judge a song as
desirable due to its high download rankings or purchase a book based on star ratings on
Amazon.com. Research also indicates that if an online video has more views than a comparable
one, it tends to attract significantly more views, partly because viewers infer that if others like it,
it must be worth watching. This showcases how peripheral cues, like popularity indicators, can
heavily influence our decisions in the digital age (Borchers).
The Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM) suggests that individuals choose their processing
strategy based on two key factors: motivation and ability. When people are highly motivated to
engage with a message or have the cognitive capacity to carefully consider message arguments,
they tend to process the information centrally. This means they critically evaluate the message's
content and arguments.
For example, when a person is passionate about environmental issues and encounters a wellreasoned argument about the benefits of solar energy, they are motivated to process the message
centrally. They'll analyze the evidence and implications before forming an opinion.
Conversely, when motivation or cognitive abilities are limited, individuals often resort to
peripheral processing. This involves superficially evaluating the message without digging deeply
into its content. In the context of online shopping, a person might quickly decide to purchase a
product based on its attractive packaging (a peripheral cue) without extensively researching its
features or benefits.
According to the Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM), when people highly involved and really
care about something, they're more likely to think deeply about it. Let's say someone is super
interested in climate change and they come across a persuasive message about reducing carbon
emissions. Even if they used to think differently, they'll take the time to carefully consider the
arguments in the message. They might change their mind if the arguments are convincing and
make them believe that taking action on climate change is beneficial.
In ELM terms, when people are highly involved like this, they use the central route. This means
they thoroughly examine and think about the arguments presented in the message, even if they
disagree with it initially (Perloff 234). Let's say someone is very interested in climate change
and they come across a persuasive message about reducing carbon emissions. Even if they used
to think differently, they'll take the time to carefully consider the arguments in the message. They
41
Persuasion and Public Opinion
might change their mind if the arguments are convincing and make them believe that taking
action on climate change is beneficial.
On the other hand, when people don't really care much about something, like the brand of
toothpaste they use, they won't bother thinking deeply about it. Let's say you're at the store and
you need to pick a toothpaste brand, but you're not all that interested in the specifics. In this case,
you're not motivated to spend a lot of time thinking about the toothpaste's features.
So, when there's low involvement like this, people tend to take shortcuts. They might just go for
the toothpaste brand that looks familiar or has a nice package without really thinking about the
details. In the world of ELM, this is processing the message peripherally, which means you're
not paying much attention to the actual information in the message.
When individuals are highly motivated or capable of processing information, they tend to engage
in central processing. This means they carefully think about the message and its arguments. This
can lead to long-lasting changes in their attitudes. However, when individuals lack the
motivation or ability to process information deeply, they often resort to peripheral processing,
which involves relying on simple cues or shortcuts. While attitude change can still occur through
peripheral processing, these changes are typically temporary (Perloff).
This reliance on peripheral cues is advantageous for persuaders because it allows them to create
straightforward, and sometimes misleading, appeals to influence individuals. Some important
cues in this process include evaluating the reputation of a website or brand, considering
endorsements from celebrities or the number of buyers, and reading reviews. Another useful cue
is consistency, which involves checking if the same information is mentioned on multiple
websites or sources (Perloff). Consider the example of a new smartphone advertisement. When
an individual is highly motivated to purchase a new phone because their current one is outdated
and not functioning well (high motivation), they might carefully scrutinize the advertisement for
technical specifications, user reviews, and comparisons with other brands. This represents central
processing and could lead to a long-term attitude change in favor of the advertised smartphone.
On the other hand, if someone isn't particularly motivated to buy a new phone because their
current one works perfectly fine (low motivation), they might glance at the advertisement, notice
that it features a famous athlete endorsing the product (a peripheral cue), and decide to consider
it later. This peripheral processing might result in a temporary attitude change, but it may not
lead to a purchase because their motivation to change their current phone is still low.
At a practical level, central processing often occurs when individuals make significant purchases
such as engagement rings, cars, and, notably, houses. In these situations, they tend to respond
favorably to well-founded arguments supporting the specific product they are considering.
However, it's important to recognize that arguments alone may not always be sufficient in
persuasion. Even well-constructed arguments can be ineffective if they clash with a person's
deeply ingrained beliefs or long-held values.
To illustrate, let's examine how staunch proponents and opponents of the death penalty reacted
when presented with evidence challenging their viewpoints. Surprisingly, they did not modify
42
Persuasion and Public Opinion
their attitudes; instead, they criticized data that contradicted their stance, praised information that
supported their perspective, and emerged with even stronger convictions about their position on
capital punishment.
What does this imply for the art of persuasion? It suggests that those who seek to persuade others
should focus on enhancing the personal relevance of their message or issue. The more persuasive
communicators can make individuals feel that a particular issue directly connects to their own
interests or priorities, the more likely it is that people will engage in central processing of the
message. This, in turn, increases the likelihood of long-lasting persuasive effects (Pavlik).
In the realm of politics, when dealing with highly engaged voters who hold firm attitudes, a
candidate's best approach may not involve radically altering those attitudes. Instead, the
candidate should aim to convince voters that they share common ground on key issues,
reinforcing existing beliefs rather than trying to change them.
For PR strategists, understanding the central route to mental processing is crucial because it
tends to have a lasting impact on attitudes and behavior. Therefore, it's essential to know how to
encourage central processing. Here's a guide:
1. Boost Motivation to Engage: Clearly articulate why your message matters and how it
directly relates to the recipient's life.
2. Enhance the Ability to Engage: Tailor your communication to the recipient's level of
knowledge and familiarity with the subject. Minimize any potential distractions.
By implementing these strategies, the audience is more likely to actively contemplate your
message, leading to a higher probability of attitude change.
Diffusion of Innovation Theory
In a world of rapid technological advancements and social change, understanding how
new ideas, products, or practices spread through society is paramount. The Diffusion of
Innovation Theory delves into the dynamics of innovation adoption, categorizing individuals into
innovators, early adopters, early majority, late majority, and laggards. This theory provides a
roadmap for orchestrating the diffusion process and highlights the pivotal role played by opinion
leaders and communication channels in shaping public opinion.
The Diffusion of Innovation Theory is a concept often used in marketing, sociology, and
communication to understand how new ideas, products, or innovations spread within a society or
a group of people. This theory explains the process by which individuals and communities adopt
or reject innovations over time.
Diffusion refers to the process by which an innovation or new idea spreads within a social
system or across a population over time. It involves the adoption and acceptance of the
innovation by individuals or groups within the society. The diffusion process typically follows a
43
Persuasion and Public Opinion
pattern, often represented by an S-shaped curve, where the innovation starts with a few early
adopters and gradually gains momentum as more people adopt it. Diffusion research, particularly
the Diffusion of Innovation Theory developed by Everett Rogers, has identified different
categories of adopters, including innovators, early adopters, early majority, late majority, and
laggards, each adopting the innovation at different stages.
Factors influencing the rate of diffusion include the perceived attributes of the innovation (e.g.,
relative advantage, compatibility, complexity), communication channels used to spread
information about the innovation, social systems and norms, and the characteristics of the
individuals or groups involved.
In essence, diffusion explores how and why innovations are adopted or rejected within a society
or community, helping researchers and practitioners understand the dynamics of change and the
factors that influence the acceptance of new ideas, products, or practices.
The Innovation Decision Process, often referred to in the context of the Diffusion of Innovation
Theory developed by Everett Rogers, is a framework that explains how individuals or
organizations make decisions about adopting or rejecting an innovation. This process consists of
several stages that individuals go through when considering whether to accept and implement a
new idea, product, or practice. The five stages of the Innovation Decision Process are as
follows:
1. Knowledge: In this stage, individuals become aware of the innovation's existence. They
acquire information about the innovation and its potential benefits. This information can
come from various sources, including media, peers, or formal communication channels.
2. Persuasion: Once individuals have knowledge about the innovation, they enter the
persuasion stage. During this phase, they seek additional information to evaluate the
innovation's advantages and disadvantages. Persuasion often involves discussions with
peers, seeking expert opinions, and evaluating how the innovation aligns with their
existing beliefs and needs.
3. Decision: In this stage, individuals make a conscious decision to either adopt or reject the
innovation. This decision is influenced by the perceived benefits, compatibility with their
values, and the level of risk associated with adopting the innovation.
4. Implementation: After deciding to adopt the innovation, individuals or organizations
proceed with its implementation. This stage involves putting the innovation into practice,
integrating it into existing systems, and overcoming any initial challenges or barriers.
5. Confirmation: The confirmation stage occurs after the innovation has been
implemented. During this phase, individuals evaluate the results and outcomes of their
decision. If they find that the innovation has delivered the expected benefits and results, it
reinforces their decision to continue using it. If not, they may reconsider their choice or
look for alternative solutions (Rogers).
The Innovation Decision Process is valuable for understanding how and why people adopt or
reject innovations. It helps researchers, marketers, and innovators tailor their communication and
strategies to facilitate the adoption process, ultimately increasing the chances of successful
innovation diffusion. Here's an example of the Innovation Decision Process in action:
44
Persuasion and Public Opinion
Let's consider the adoption of electric vehicles (EVs) in a hypothetical community:
1. Knowledge: People in the community become aware of electric vehicles as an alternative
to traditional gasoline-powered cars through advertisements, news reports, and social
media. They learn about the benefits, such as lower operating costs and reduced
environmental impact.
2. Persuasion: Some community members are intrigued by the idea of EVs but seek more
information. They engage in discussions with friends and family who already own EVs,
read reviews and articles about different EV models, and attend local EV expos to learn
more.
3. Decision: After careful consideration, some community members decide to make the
switch to electric vehicles. Their decision is influenced by factors like the availability of
charging infrastructure in their area, government incentives for EV buyers, and their
commitment to reducing their carbon footprint.
4. Implementation: Those who decide to adopt EVs purchase their electric vehicles and
install charging stations at their homes. They adjust to the new technology, charging
routines, and maintenance requirements.
5. Confirmation: After driving EVs for some time, these individuals evaluate their
experience. If they find that their electric vehicles meet their needs, save money on fuel,
and align with their environmental values, they are likely to confirm their decision by
continuing to use and advocate for EVs. However, if they encounter significant
challenges or are dissatisfied with their experience, they may reconsider their choice or
explore alternative transportation options.
This example illustrates how the stages of the Innovation Decision Process apply to the adoption
of electric vehicles, with individuals progressing from awareness to adoption and eventual
confirmation or reconsideration based on their experiences.
45
Persuasion and Public Opinion
At its core, the theory proposes that the adoption of innovations follows a predictable pattern.
This pattern includes five categories of adopters (Rogers):
1. Innovators: These are the risk-takers and early enthusiasts who embrace new ideas or
products almost as soon as they become available. In the Diffusion of Innovation Theory,
"Innovators" refer to a distinct group of individuals who play a pivotal role in the
adoption of new ideas, products, or technologies. These pioneers are known for their
adventurous and risk-taking nature. They eagerly embrace innovations, often at the
earliest stages of introduction, and are characterized by their willingness to experiment
with novel concepts. Innovators tend to be well-informed and financially capable, making
them instrumental in paving the way for broader acceptance of innovations. Their
enthusiasm and advocacy contribute significantly to the overall diffusion process,
inspiring others to follow suit.
Consider the introduction of a groundbreaking smartphone with advanced features, such
as foldable screens and augmented reality capabilities. Innovators would be the early
buyers who pre-order this smartphone as soon as it's announced, often before there are
extensive reviews or user feedback available. They are drawn to the novelty and potential
benefits of the innovation.
In the world of social media, Innovators might be the first to join a new platform or
experiment with a novel feature, even if it's in beta testing. They are the ones who eagerly
try out new apps and digital services, often sharing their experiences with friends and
followers. For businesses and innovators themselves, understanding this group is crucial.
They can serve as initial ambassadors for a product or idea, providing valuable feedback
46
Persuasion and Public Opinion
and helping to create a buzz around it. Innovators are instrumental in the early stages of
diffusion and can significantly influence the success of an innovation.
2. Early Adopters: These individuals are open to innovation but prefer a bit of reassurance
before adopting something new. "Early Adopters" represent a specific category of
individuals who come after the Innovators in embracing new ideas, products, or
technologies. These individuals exhibit a keen interest in innovation but are more
deliberate and cautious in their approach compared to Innovators. Early Adopters are
often viewed as opinion leaders within their social circles, and their acceptance of an
innovation carries significant influence. They bridge the gap between the adventurous
Innovators and the more skeptical majority, serving as role models and helping to propel
an innovation towards broader adoption.
An example of Early Adopters can be found in the introduction of electric cars to the
market. When electric cars were first launched, a small group of Innovators quickly
purchased them due to their enthusiasm for cutting-edge technology. Early Adopters,
however, were the next wave of consumers who saw the potential benefits of electric
vehicles but wanted to ensure they were reliable and practical for everyday use. They
conducted thorough research, read reviews, and observed the experiences of Innovators
before deciding to buy electric cars themselves. Their adoption helped to pave the way
for the broader acceptance of electric vehicles among the general population.
3. Early Majority: The early majority represents the more cautious individuals who adopt
innovations after they've been tried and tested by the innovators and early adopters. They
provide a bridge between early adopters and the late majority. The Early Majority prefers
to see evidence of an innovation's effectiveness and reliability. They are critical thinkers
who rely on practicality and real-world results. An example could be the adoption of
electric cars by a larger portion of the population once they became more affordable, and
there was a well-established charging infrastructure, making them a practical choice for
everyday transportation.
4. Late Majority: These individuals are sceptical about change and only adopt innovations
when they have become the norm or when they see significant advantages in doing so.
They are hesitant and tend to wait until the majority of society has already adopted an
innovation. Late Majority individuals are often influenced by peer pressure and a fear of
being left behind. They need strong evidence of an innovation's success and reliability
before they are willing to embrace it. An example could be the adoption of smartphones,
where some individuals waited until these devices became an integral part of daily life for
the majority of the population before acquiring one.
47
Persuasion and Public Opinion
5. Laggards: Laggards are typically resistant to change and are the last to adopt new
innovations. They may do so out of necessity rather than enthusiasm. They are
individuals who are known for being very cautious and slow to adopt new ideas or
technologies. They often prefer to stick with traditional methods and are highly skeptical
of change. Laggards tend to adopt innovations only when they have become widely
accepted and practically unavoidable in society. They are the last group to embrace new
ideas, and their adoption is typically driven by necessity rather than a willingness to try
something new. In terms of technology, Laggards may still be using older devices or
methods long after more innovative options have become commonplace.
Case: Diffusion of Innovation and Facebook
When Facebook was initially introduced, Innovators were the first to join, excited about this
innovative way of connecting with others online. They were followed by Early Adopters, who
also embraced the new technology.
Now, Early Majority individuals began to notice their friends, family members, and colleagues
actively using Facebook and sharing their experiences. This growing social proof convinced
them to create accounts and start using the platform.
However, it wasn't until the Late Majority saw that a substantial portion of their social circle
had already joined Facebook that they decided to follow suit. They needed reassurance from
the majority of people they knew.
Finally, Laggards, who are typically the most resistant to change, held off on joining Facebook
until it became almost a necessity in society. Even then, they might have been hesitant and
joined reluctantly.
This scenario highlights how different groups of individuals adopt innovations at various
stages, with Laggards being the last to embrace new technologies or ideas.
The Diffusion of Innovation Theory is highly significant in the realm of persuasion due to its
profound insights into how ideas, products, or innovations spread and are adopted within society.
Understanding this theory is crucial for persuaders for several reasons.
Firstly, it provides a framework for comprehending the different stages of adoption, from
innovators to laggards. This insight allows persuaders to tailor their messaging and strategies to
target specific groups effectively. For instance, persuaders can use different approaches when
targeting early adopters, emphasizing novelty and uniqueness, compared to targeting the late
majority, focusing on practical benefits and social proof.
48
Persuasion and Public Opinion
Secondly, the theory highlights the role of opinion leaders and social networks in influencing
adoption. Persuaders can identify and engage these opinion leaders to help spread their message
more effectively within a community or target audience.
Thirdly, understanding the resistance to change exhibited by some groups, such as laggards,
helps persuaders anticipate objections and tailor their messaging to address these concerns.
Lastly, the theory emphasizes the importance of perceived attributes of innovations, such as
relative advantage, compatibility, and observability. Persuaders can strategically highlight these
attributes to make their message more appealing and persuasive to potential adopters.
In summary, the Diffusion of Innovation Theory equips persuaders with valuable insights into
the dynamics of adoption, enabling them to develop more effective persuasive strategies, target
the right audiences, and address objections and resistance to change. It ultimately enhances the
persuader's ability to achieve successful outcomes in various domains, from marketing to social
change campaigns.
The Diffusion of Innovation Theory is important in various contexts where the adoption and
acceptance of new ideas, products, or technologies play a crucial role. Here are some situations
when this theory becomes particularly relevant:
1. Product Launches: When companies introduce new products or technologies to the
market, understanding the different stages of adoption (innovators, early adopters, early
majority, late majority, and laggards) helps in tailoring marketing and communication
strategies to target specific groups effectively.
2. Technology Adoption: In the tech industry, knowing how different segments of the
population embrace innovation is essential. This knowledge aids in product development,
marketing, and predicting market trends.
3. Healthcare: In healthcare, the adoption of new medical treatments, procedures, or
technologies can significantly impact patient outcomes. Understanding how healthcare
professionals and patients embrace these innovations is vital for successful
implementation.
4. Education: Educational institutions often introduce new teaching methods, tools, or
technologies. Recognizing how teachers, students, and administrators adopt and adapt to
these changes is crucial for successful educational innovation.
5. Policy Implementation: Government policies and regulations can benefit from an
understanding of how various groups within society accept or resist new laws and
regulations. This knowledge helps in effective policy implementation and
communication.
6. Social Movements: Activists and social change agents can use diffusion theory to plan
and execute campaigns more effectively. It allows them to identify early supporters, build
momentum, and eventually reach a broader audience.
7. Public Health: In public health campaigns, such as vaccination drives or disease
prevention efforts, understanding how communities adopt recommended behaviors is
essential for achieving public health goals.
49
Persuasion and Public Opinion
8. Environmental Initiatives: In environmental conservation and sustainability efforts,
knowing how different segments of society adopt eco-friendly practices and technologies
is crucial for promoting sustainable behaviors.
Case study: Apple Marketing Strategy
One compelling real-life case of the Diffusion of Innovation Theory in action is the marketing
strategy employed by Apple Inc. for the iPhone. Apple leveraged this theory effectively to
introduce and establish the iPhone as a revolutionary product in the smartphone industry.

Innovators (2.5%): Apple initially targeted tech-savvy innovators who were early
adopters of new technologies. The iPhone's cutting-edge features, including a touchscreen
interface and mobile internet capabilities, appealed to this group. Innovators were attracted
by the novelty and uniqueness of the device.
Early Adopters (13.5%): Apple then shifted its focus to early adopters who seek social
status through technology. They used these consumers as opinion leaders. High-profile
endorsements from celebrities and tech influencers helped create buzz around the iPhone,
making it desirable among this group.
Early Majority (34%): To appeal to the early majority, Apple highlighted the iPhone's
user-friendliness, compatibility with existing Apple products, and practical benefits for both
work and leisure. They used word-of-mouth and customer testimonials to instill confidence in
potential buyers.
Late Majority (34%): As the iPhone became more commonplace, Apple introduced
different models catering to diverse price points and needs. They emphasized its widespread
adoption and compatibility with various apps, making it more appealing to the late majority.
Laggards (16%): Apple continued to support older iPhone models, ensuring that even
laggards could access a more affordable version. They addressed concerns about complexity
by offering user-friendly interfaces and customer support.
Apple's carefully crafted marketing strategy, addressing different segments of the market over
time, played a pivotal role in making the iPhone one of the most successful consumer products
ever. This case illustrates how understanding the diffusion of innovation can guide a company
in launching, promoting, and sustaining the adoption of a groundbreaking product.
50
Persuasion and Public Opinion
Chapter Three: Persuasive Appeals and
Techniques
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
After reading this chapter, you should be able to:

Define and differentiate between various
persuasive appeals used in communication
and advertising.

Analyze Aristotle's classical modes of
persuasion (Ethos, Pathos, Logos)

Identify real-world examples of persuasive
appeals and Cialdini's principles
Understanding persuasion can be simplified by focusing on its three fundamental elements.
Persuasion involves an advocate, who is an individual or a group with a particular viewpoint to
convey. There's also the message, which represents the advocate's perspective and what they
want their audience to embrace. Finally, there's the audience, comprising the individuals who are
meant to receive and consider the message. Without any of these components, communication
for persuasion becomes unattainable.
Additionally, it's essential to take into account the context in which persuasion occurs. Context
includes the surrounding circumstances, the timing, and the environment in which the
communication takes place. All these factors can significantly influence the effectiveness of
persuasion. Therefore, a comprehensive understanding of persuasion involves not only the
advocate, message, and audience but also the broader context in which the persuasive
communication unfolds.
Key Components of Persuasion
The main components of persuasion are persuader, receiver, message and context. These
components interact dynamically. The sender carefully designs the message, tailoring it to the
51
Persuasion and Public Opinion
characteristics and preferences of the receiver. They choose an appropriate channel for delivery,
considering whether a face-to-face conversation, social media, or another medium is most
effective.
When the receiver encounters the message, they process it based on their own values, beliefs,
and attitudes, which are influenced by the context in which they receive it. If the message aligns
with their existing views and resonates with their values, they are more likely to be persuaded.
However, if it clashes with their beliefs or seems out of place in the given context, they may
resist its influence.
Successful persuasion hinges on understanding how these elements interact and crafting
messages that not only appeal to the receiver's mindset but also consider the broader context in
which the communication takes place. By navigating these interactions effectively, persuaders
can increase the likelihood of achieving their intended outcomes.
Persuader
In the art of persuasion, the "persuader" plays a central role as the individual or entity responsible
for crafting and delivering persuasive messages. The persuader is the communicator, the message
creator, and the orchestrator of the persuasive process. Understanding the role of the persuader is
essential in comprehending how persuasion works and how it can be effectively employed.
Credibility is a foundational element of persuasion. The persuader must cultivate trust and
credibility to gain the audience's confidence. This can be achieved through expertise, experience,
transparency, and ethical behavior. A credible persuader is more likely to have an impact on the
audience.
In the world of effective communication, an ideal scenario unfolds when the audience not only
supports the message but also holds a positive view of the person delivering it. Picture this:
enthusiastic supporters eagerly assemble to listen to a well-respected leader articulate their
cherished beliefs. This represents an ideal communication environment.
In our daily lives, we frequently grapple with questions related to the credibility of persuaders.
These questions can span from scrutinizing allegations against political leaders to making
decisions about where to buy a new car or any other consumer product. We find ourselves in the
position of evaluating whether the individuals and institutions trying to persuade us are both
truthful and competent.
Credibility, in essence, is the dynamic perception of the persuader held by the audience. It's a
subjective judgment that each audience member forms individually. For instance, one set of
voters may perceive a specific political candidate as highly competent, while another group
might view the same candidate as lacking competence. Assessing a persuader's credibility is no
52
Persuasion and Public Opinion
straightforward task. It's a social construct, a concept shaped, upheld, and altered through the
process of communication.
Frequently, our impressions of a persuader don't result from direct interactions or thorough
research into the persuader's qualifications. Instead, we shape our perception of a persuader
through interactions with media and information presented via media channels. This perception
is often referred to as an "image," representing a mental portrayal of a person, organization, or
even a country.
Persuaders invest significant efforts and resources in constructing images for their audiences. For
instance, many companies meticulously craft their image through extensive advertising
campaigns. Even the packaging of a product can contribute to the image formed by consumers.
On a personal level, individuals also work on creating images of themselves for their audiences.
In the realm of politics, for instance, candidates have recently utilized video montages during
political conventions to showcase their personalities and characteristics to the public.
The following are examples to illustrate the concept of image creation by persuaders:
1. Branding: Companies like Coca-Cola have meticulously built an image of their brand
through decades of advertising. Their advertisements often emphasize values like
happiness, togetherness, and refreshment, which have become associated with the brand's
image.
2. Product Packaging: Apple is known for its sleek and minimalist product designs. The
packaging of their products, such as the iPhone, not only protects the device but also
conveys an image of sophistication and cutting-edge technology.
3. Political Image: During election campaigns, political candidates often work on shaping
their image. For example, a candidate might emphasize their background, values, and
accomplishments through carefully curated speeches and media appearances.
4. Personal Branding: Influencers and celebrities create and maintain their images through
social media, public appearances, and endorsements. For instance, a fitness influencer
may create an image of health and wellness to attract followers and sponsors.
5. Country Image: Nations also work on crafting their images. Tourism campaigns often
showcase beautiful landscapes and vibrant cultures to attract visitors. Some countries
focus on projecting an image of stability and safety to encourage foreign investment.
These examples highlight how persuaders actively manage the way they are perceived by their
target audiences to achieve their persuasive goals.
Among the essential communicator attributes are authority, credibility, and social attractiveness.
Authorities, credible communicators, and those with social appeal bring about attitude changes
using distinct mechanisms.
A persuader's effectiveness in persuasion can be influenced by their credibility, authority, and
attractiveness. However, the most effective attribute among these depends on factors like the
nature of the message and the characteristics of the audience."
53
Persuasion and Public Opinion
Authorities often exert influence on others through a process known as compliance. This means
that individuals may adopt a specific behavior not necessarily because they personally agree with
it, but because they anticipate gaining rewards or approval, or avoiding punishments or
disapproval by conforming. In simpler terms, people tend to follow authority figures because
they expect some form of benefit or wish to prevent negative consequences.
Imagine a television advertisement for a popular brand of toothpaste. In this ad, a well-known
and respected dentist appears as the spokesperson. The dentist confidently states that this
toothpaste is the best for maintaining oral health and preventing cavities, backed by their years of
experience and expertise. Many viewers, even those who might not fully understand the
scientific details of dental care, are likely to comply with the message.
In this scenario, the authority figure (the dentist) influences compliance among viewers. People
may decide to use the advertised toothpaste not necessarily because they deeply understand or
agree with the dental science behind it, but because they trust the authority figure's
recommendation. They hope to gain the rewards of good oral health and approval from their own
dentist during their next check-up, and they want to avoid the disapproval of having dental
issues. This illustrates how authority can be a persuasive tool in advertising and public relations.
Credible communicators, on the other hand, have a significant impact on shaping attitudes
through a process known as internalization. When we encounter recommendations from credible
sources, we tend to accept and adopt them because they align with our existing values and
attitudes. Traits that contribute to credibility often encompass attributes like training, experience,
and intelligence.
Attractive communicators who possess qualities of likability and physical appeal often exert
influence through more emotional processes, such as identification. Individuals tend to align
themselves with attractive speakers because they feel a connection or aspire to establish a
positive rapport with these communicators.
Audiences: The Generative Forces of Persuasion
The study of public persuasion fundamentally relies on the concept of the audience. Persuasion,
by its nature, is aimed at someone specific, and its effectiveness is based on addressing the needs
and pre-existing beliefs of particular individuals or groups. However, the idea of an audience
comes with its complexities.
One notable challenge lies in the assumption that individuals can be neatly categorized into a
single, cohesive unit. This hinges heavily on the concept of homogeneity, the expectation that
people within an audience share common attitudes, preferences, and demographic characteristics,
such as age, gender, income, geographical location or interests. Media platforms frequently use
these features to "pitch" their audiences to advertisers. Additionally, creators in various
54
Persuasion and Public Opinion
entertainment industries often believe they have a deep understanding of their specific "niche" or
target market.
Nonetheless, the practical application of the audience concept often falls short of theoretical
expectations. Audiences in reality are seldom as uniform or homogeneous as we might assume.
The inherent diversity among individuals within an audience poses a significant challenge when
attempting to tailor persuasive messages effectively (Denton).
While it carries risks, some audience characteristics can be concluded from traditional
demographic factors such as age, gender, income, education, geographic location, and affiliation
with formal organizations. It's important to acknowledge that there can be significant variations
even within these groups, but some commonalities in key attitudes may emerge. For instance,
radio stations and their advertisers often observe that specific musical preferences align with
distinct listener groups, like teenagers, older adults, suburban residents, or young urban men.
Inference-making entails drawing conclusions about likely beliefs based on established facts.
Although these inferences are not always precise, they serve as a valuable tool for tailoring
persuasive strategies. For instance, audiences primarily composed of farmers would require a
different approach than those comprising small business owners, retirees, union members, or
college seniors. Persuaders dealing with these diverse groups often begin with general traits and
then deduce likely attitudes and values that the group may support or oppose (Denton).
Timing and Context
Understanding when and where to deliver the persuasive message is crucial. Some messages
may be more effective when delivered at specific moments or within certain contexts.
Context plays a crucial role in the art of persuasion. It refers to the surrounding circumstances,
environment, and conditions in which a persuasive message is delivered or received.
Understanding and effectively utilizing the context is essential for tailoring persuasive efforts to
the specific needs and preferences of the audience. Here's a closer look at the significance of
context in persuasion:
1. Relevance: The context helps determine the relevance of a persuasive message. A
message that is contextually appropriate and timely is more likely to resonate with the
audience. For example, a marketing campaign for winter clothing will be more effective
in the context of cold weather and snow.
2. Audience Analysis: Context informs the persuader's understanding of the audience.
Factors such as the audience's culture, values, beliefs, and current circumstances
influence how they perceive and respond to persuasive messages. Effective persuaders
conduct thorough audience analysis to adapt their message to the specific context.
55
Persuasion and Public Opinion
3. Timing: The timing of a persuasive message can significantly impact its effectiveness. In
some situations, delivering a message at the right moment can maximize its impact. For
example, encouraging people to save for retirement may be more effective as they
approach middle age.
4. Cultural Context: Cultural norms, values, and traditions play a significant role in
persuasion. A message that respects and aligns with the cultural context is more likely to
be accepted. Cultural sensitivity is particularly crucial in international marketing and
communication efforts.
5. Competing Messages: The context may include competing messages from other sources.
Persuaders need to be aware of these competing messages and strategically position their
own message to stand out and be persuasive.
6. Psychological State of the Audience: The emotional and psychological state of the
audience can vary depending on the context. Persuaders must consider the audience's
mood, emotions, and mental state when crafting and delivering messages. Emotional
appeals may be more effective in certain contexts, while logical arguments may be better
suited for others.
7. Social and Political Climate: The broader social and political climate can impact the
reception of persuasive messages. Issues and debates in society may influence how the
audience perceives and responds to certain messages. Persuaders should be attuned to
these factors.
In essence, context is a dynamic and multifaceted element that shapes the success of
persuasive efforts. Effective persuaders recognize that the same message delivered in
different contexts can yield vastly different results. By tailoring their approach to the specific
context and audience, persuaders can increase the likelihood of achieving their persuasive
goals. Context-aware persuasion is not only more effective but also more respectful of the
audience's needs and preferences.
The Message: Importance of Motivational Appeals
Motivational appeals, as described by Gass (490), refer to external incentives, often emotional,
intended to boost a person's motivation to take specific actions. These incentives are separate
from the main message and aim to change people's emotions, moods, or feelings as a persuasive
strategy. Motivational appeals, as a concept, can be seen as efforts to ignite an individual's
motivation to take action. These appeals are widespread and encompass various emotions such as
anxiety, fear, guilt, health, honor, humor, patriotism, pity, pride, warmth, and more. In this
section, we will explore the use of emotional appeals in marketing.
56
Persuasion and Public Opinion
People often assume that decisions driven by emotions are flawed. For instance, choosing a car
based on how it makes you feel might seem unwise. We tend to believe that the best decisions
stem from reliable evidence and sound reasoning. Consequently, buying a car for emotional
reasons, like how it makes us feel, is often considered less rational than choosing one based on
factors like gas mileage or resale value. However, it's crucial to recognize that motivational
appeals play a significant role in persuasion. Effective and legitimate persuasion combines
elements of credibility, logic, and motivational appeals. To grasp why emotions matter in
persuasion, let's explore two key reasons: first, motivational appeals motivate the audience to act
on the persuader's message, and second, they assist us in making ethical decisions (Borchers).
First and foremost, emotions play a vital role in driving conviction within the audience. This is
why these appeals are termed "motivational" – they inspire or motivate the audience to take
action. Typically, the persuader's objective is to encourage the audience member to do
something, whether it's believing in a certain idea or taking action based on the message
conveyed. Purely logical appeals may sometimes lack the strength needed for this. While
audience members might agree with the persuader, lacking strong conviction, they may not act
on their beliefs. To truly prompt action, audience members must feel a deep passion for what the
persuader is conveying. Consequently, persuaders are more likely to achieve their objectives
when they succeed in motivating their audience (Gass).
To illustrate this concept further, consider the following example. Imagine an advertisement
promoting a fitness center. This advertisement could certainly provide essential details like
pricing, available equipment, and staff expertise. However, if these were the only elements
presented, it would likely not inspire many potential customers to join the fitness facility or kick
start a new fitness routine. Conversely, a motivational advertisement would be significantly more
impactful. Such an ad could go beyond practical information and create strong emotions in the
audience. For instance, it might depict an individual's sheer pride and sense of accomplishment
after conquering a challenging workout session. Alternatively, the ad could feature lively scenes
of healthy, active parents joyfully engaging in physical activities with their children, portraying a
heartwarming family bond (Borchers 300).
In both of these scenarios, the persuader uses powerful symbols that deeply resonate with the
audience's emotions. These symbols tap into individuals' feelings of achievement, belonging, and
the desire for a healthier lifestyle. By doing so, the persuasive message becomes not just
informative but also emotionally engaging, making it more likely to motivate the audience to
take action, whether it's signing up for the fitness center or embarking on a fitness journey. This
demonstrates the significant role that emotional appeals play in effective persuasion, forging a
compelling connection between the audience and the message.
Motivational appeals are a crucial tool in the arsenal of persuaders. Their primary purpose is to
bring about shifts in the values, beliefs, opinions, attitudes, and behaviors of those they are trying
to influence. Essentially, a motivational appeal serves as the aspect of a message that conveys a
sense of intensity, concern, or urgency.
57
Persuasion and Public Opinion
These appeals are strategically crafted to evoke specific emotions within the audience, which, in
turn, are expected to lead to well-defined, socially constructed responses. To grasp this concept
more concretely, let's consider a real-world campaign.
Imagine a public health campaign aimed at reducing smoking rates among teenagers. While the
campaign may include factual information about the health risks of smoking and the benefits of
quitting, it goes beyond these data-driven messages. It employs motivational appeals by using
powerful visuals and narratives that trigger emotions like fear, concern, and hope. These
emotional cues are strategically designed to make teenagers reflect on their smoking habits and
consider quitting.
In this example, the persuasive message not only imparts knowledge but also leverages
motivational appeals to elicit a deep emotional response. By doing so, it aims to inspire
behavioral change – in this case, convincing teenagers to refrain from smoking or seek assistance
in quitting. This underscores the significant role that motivational appeals play in shaping
attitudes and behaviors, ultimately driving individuals to take socially beneficial actions.
Developing an effective message requires many choices. One major decision is what information
to include. While the topic sets the foundation, not everything can fit. Persuaders must carefully
pick what to include and what to leave out to create a strong message. The choice of emotions is
also important. Emotions can strongly influence how people react. Deciding which emotions to
use, like happiness, fear, empathy, or hope, depends on the message's goal and what will
resonate with the audience. All of these decisions together determine how well the message can
persuade and achieve its goals.
Advertising professionals frequently craft campaigns with the intention of triggering
emotions like fear, affection, or remorse in consumers. Extensive research has shown that
individuals tend to form emotional bonds with particular brands. For instance, Apple's products,
including the Mac, iPhone, and iPad, have successfully cultivated strong emotional connections
among their users. This emotional resonance sets them apart from users of non-Apple products.
Such emotional ties enable marketers to effectively connect with consumers, nurturing their
enthusiasm and devotion to their brands (Gass 493).
A real-life example of this emotional branding can be seen in Coca-Cola's marketing efforts. The
company has consistently used heartwarming and joyous advertisements, such as those featuring
polar bears during the Christmas season. These campaigns aim to evoke feelings of happiness
and nostalgia in consumers, associating these positive emotions with the Coca-Cola brand and
fostering a sense of emotional connection and loyalty among its customers.
In Egypt, an excellent example of emotional branding can be observed in the marketing efforts of
a local tea company. This company has consistently used heartwarming and joyful
advertisements, such as those depicting families and friends sharing tea during festive occasions
or intimate gatherings. These campaigns aim to evoke feelings of happiness, togetherness, and
nostalgia among Egyptian consumers. By associating these positive emotions with their tea
58
Persuasion and Public Opinion
products, the company has successfully fostered a deep emotional connection and loyalty among
its customers in Egypt.
59
Persuasion and Public Opinion
Chapter Four: Persuasion in Context:
Advertising campaigns
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
After reading this chapter, you should be
able to:

Understand Cialdini’s principles of
persuasion.

Evaluate persuasion techniques and
strategies used in advertising campaigns
Cialdini’s ‘weapons of influence`
Cialdini's theory of persuasion is an essential part of social psychology. It explores how people
are influenced to change their thoughts and actions. It looks at not just logical arguments but also
the subtle ways our minds work. Cialdini talks about six important ideas that affect how we
make decisions. These ideas include things like feeling the need to give back when someone
does something nice for us or being influenced by what others do around us. Learning about
Cialdini's theory helps us understand how persuasion works in many areas of life, like marketing,
sales, and how we interact with others.
Cialdini assumes that people are generally acting in their own self-interest in compliance
situations. Cialdini says that persuasion has six patterns of motivation that, when turned against
us, become ‘weapons of influence’:
1. Reciprocation: When someone gives us a gift or favor, we often feel a sense of
obligation to return the favor.
2. Commitment and Consistency: Our desire to maintain agreements and appear
consistent in our actions can be a strong motivator.
3. Social Proof: We are often influenced by the behaviors and actions of those around us.
4. Liking: We are more susceptible to persuasion when the source is someone we like and
find attractive.
5. Authority: Deference to authority figures is a deeply ingrained aspect of many cultures.
6. Scarcity: The fear of missing out and the perceived value of rare or limited resources
both play a role in influencing our decisions. (Cialdini)
60
Persuasion and Public Opinion
Reciprocation
Reciprocation is a concept in persuasion where if someone does something nice for you or gives
you a gift, you often feel a sense of obligation to do something nice in return. It's like a social
exchange where people try to repay kindness or favors. For example, if a friend helps you move
to a new apartment, you might feel like you should help them when they need it in the future.
This idea of giving back when someone does something for you is a strong motivator in how
people make decisions and interact with each other.
Reciprocation is a psychological principle that's frequently used in advertising and public
relations to influence people's behavior. Here's how it's applied:
Free Samples: Companies often offer free samples of their products. When people receive
something for free, they feel obliged to reciprocate by considering purchasing the full product.
Gifts and Giveaways: Promotions that include free gifts or giveaways are designed to trigger
the sense of reciprocation. By providing something valuable upfront, businesses hope to
encourage customers to make a purchase.
Content Marketing: Offering free, valuable content like e-books, webinars, or informative
articles can create a sense of reciprocity. People who benefit from this content may be more
inclined to engage further with a brand, such as subscribing to newsletters or making a purchase.
Customer Loyalty Programs: Loyalty programs often reward customers with points,
discounts, or free items. This reward system encourages customers to keep coming back, as they
feel they are receiving something extra for their loyalty.
Donation Requests: Non-profit organizations frequently use the principle of reciprocation in
fundraising efforts. When they provide donors with small gifts or tokens of appreciation, donors
may be more inclined to contribute larger sums.


Personalization: Personalizing communication, like addressing customers by their names in
emails, can create a sense of reciprocity. Customers may respond positively to these
personalized efforts.
Social Media Engagement: Engaging with customers on social media by responding to their
comments or messages is a way of reciprocating their interest. This can lead to increased
brand loyalty and advocacy.
Reciprocation is a powerful tool in advertising and public relations because it taps into the
human desire to give back when something is received. It can foster goodwill, build
relationships, and ultimately drive sales or support for a brand or cause.
61
Persuasion and Public Opinion
Commitment and consistency
Commitment and consistency is a concept in persuasion that means when people make a
commitment or a promise, they tend to stick to it because they want to be seen as consistent in
their actions and beliefs. Consistently behaving in line with our commitments is often seen as a
sign of trustworthiness and moral values like honesty and integrity. People tend to maintain
consistency to protect their self-image and avoid admitting mistakes. This tendency becomes
especially evident when people's long-held beliefs about topics like religion, science, or politics
are questioned. Interestingly, when faced with challenges to their beliefs, individuals often
become even more resistant to change (Cialdini).
In advertising or sales, this principle is used when they get you to say "yes" to something small
first, like taking a free trial. Once you've said yes to that, you're more likely to say yes to buying
the full product because you want to be consistent with your earlier decision.
In marketing or public relations, this principle is applied when companies encourage you to take
a small step, like signing up for a newsletter. Once you've taken that initial step, you're more
likely to make a larger commitment, such as purchasing a product, because you want to align
with your previous decision to engage with the brand. This demonstrates how commitment and
consistency can influence behavior and decision-making.
Social proof
Social proof is when people look at the actions and behaviors of others to guide their own
decisions and actions. In simpler terms, it means that when we see a lot of people doing
something, we tend to think it's the right thing to do.
For example, if you're in a new city and you see a crowd of people lining up at a food truck, you
might decide to join the line too because you assume the food must be good if so many people
are waiting for it.
62
Persuasion and Public Opinion
In advertising and public relations, social proof is used to show that many people approve of or
use a product or service. For instance, you might see a commercial that says, "Join the millions
of satisfied customers who use our product," which is trying to convince you that it's a good
choice because so many others have chosen it. When salespeople informed their customers that
a specific product was "the most popular," "the best-selling," or "selling faster than we can bring
them in," customers spent more money compared to when the salespeople employed other
strategies like complimenting the customer, offering favors, or showcasing their expertise and
trustworthiness (Gass 244).
In essence, social proof leverages the idea that if others are doing something, it must be the right
thing to do, and this can strongly influence people's decisions and behaviors.
The marketing team behind the energy drink Red Bull employed a clever strategy that leveraged
social proof. Instead of relying solely on individuals to talk about their product, they placed
empty Red Bull cans in public spaces like sidewalk trash cans and bar tables. By doing so, they
created a visible and noticeable representation of the drink's popularity. When people saw these
empty cans in various locations, it sent a powerful message that many others were consuming
Red Bull. This, in turn, influenced people to consider trying it themselves, as they didn't want to
miss out on what seemed like a widely accepted and trendy choice. In essence, Red Bull used the
concept of social proof – the idea that people tend to follow the behaviors of others – to boost
their product's appeal and sales.
Therefore, we are more likely to visit restaurants that are considered 'popular' and read books
that are labeled as 'best sellers.' These examples illustrate how the concept of social proof plays a
significant role in our decisions and behaviors.
63
Persuasion and Public Opinion
Liking
Cialdini's concept of liking is based on the idea that people are more likely to be persuaded by
individuals they find likable and attractive. It taps into the human tendency to favor those we
have positive feelings towards. This liking can be based on various factors, including physical
attractiveness, similarity, compliments, and familiarity.
For example, if a salesperson is friendly, compliments the customer, and shares some common
interests or characteristics, the customer is more likely to respond positively. This concept is
widely used in advertising and marketing, where companies often feature likable and relatable
individuals in their campaigns to make their products or services more appealing.
In essence, Cialdini's concept of liking underscores the significance of building rapport and
creating a positive impression when trying to persuade someone. When people feel a sense of
liking or connection with a persuader, they are more inclined to be influenced by their messages
or recommendations.
Similarly, on social networking sites, they group 'friends' together in online communities to
advertise, promote events, and gather information for marketing, all while giving the impression
of connecting and empowering users.
In advertising, products are often associated with celebrities, attractive individuals, or positive
emotions and experiences. Even though voters may not admit to it, political candidates who are
attractive tend to receive more votes. Attractive people generally receive better treatment.
Conforming to fashion trends and wearing uniforms also strongly influences how people
perceive one's character and sense of belonging to a group.
Authority
In Cialdini's concept of authority, he explores how people tend to follow and respect figures of
authority. This means that individuals are more likely to comply with requests, suggestions, or
commands from someone they perceive as an authority figure. Authority figures are often seen
as possessing expertise, knowledge, or a higher social or professional status in a particular
domain.
Cialdini suggests that the concept of authority plays a significant role in the art of persuasion.
When people encounter someone they perceive as an authority, they may feel compelled to trust
and obey that person's directives. This trust is often based on the assumption that the authority
figure possesses specialized knowledge or expertise in a given area, making their guidance
reliable and credible.
64
Persuasion and Public Opinion
For example, in marketing and advertising, a common tactic is to use experts, professionals, or
celebrities to endorse products. Consumers are more likely to trust and buy products that have
been endorsed by someone with authority in that field.
Pepsi has a long history of using celebrities in their advertisements. One of the most memorable
campaigns was their series of commercials featuring famous stars like Michael Jackson, Britney
Spears, and Beyoncé. By associating their brand with these likable and admired figures, Pepsi
aimed to make their product more appealing to a broad audience.
Nike often partners with well-liked and admired athletes like Michael Jordan, LeBron James, and
Serena Williams. These athletes not only represent excellence in their respective sports but also
embody qualities like determination and hard work. Nike's likable athlete endorsements help
convey their brand message of striving for greatness.
Scarcity
Cialdini's concept of scarcity revolves around the idea that people are more inclined to value and
desire items or opportunities that appear to be limited or in short supply. This principle of
scarcity taps into several psychological triggers that influence human behavior.
Firstly, when something is presented as scarce or hard to obtain, it triggers a sense of urgency.
People believe that if they don't act quickly, they might miss out on the opportunity altogether.
This urgency often leads to quicker decision-making, such as making a purchase.
Secondly, scarcity enhances the perceived value of an item. When people believe that something
is rare or limited, they tend to attribute higher value to it. This perception of increased worth
makes individuals more eager to possess the item.
Moreover, the fear of missing out (FOMO) plays a significant role. People want to avoid the
regret of not taking advantage of a valuable opportunity. Scarcity exploits this fear of regret,
making individuals more likely to take action to secure the limited resource.
65
Persuasion and Public Opinion
Additionally, scarcity can fuel competition among individuals. When people are aware that
others are also interested in the same scarce resource, they may feel a stronger desire to obtain it,
leading to a sense of competition.
In practice, scarcity is used as a persuasive tool in various ways, such as limited-time offers,
exclusive access, messages like "only a few left," and countdown timers on websites. These
tactics leverage the principle of scarcity to encourage individuals to act quickly and make
decisions they might not have made if the item or opportunity were readily available.
A classic real-life example of the scarcity principle in action is the annual release of Apple's new
iPhone models. Apple is known for creating a sense of scarcity and anticipation around its
product launches. Months before the official release, rumors start circulating about the new
features and improvements. As the release date approaches, Apple maintains an air of secrecy,
revealing only limited details. This secrecy creates a knowledge gap, leaving potential customers
curious and eager to learn more.
When the new iPhone is finally unveiled, Apple often announces that it will be available in
limited quantities initially. This announcement triggers a sense of urgency and competition
among consumers. People fear that if they don't act quickly, they might have to wait for weeks or
even months to get their hands on the latest iPhone.
Stores often have long lines of customers camping out overnight to be among the first to
purchase the new iPhone. This phenomenon occurs because Apple has effectively leveraged the
scarcity principle. The perception of limited supply and the fear of missing out on the latest
technology drive people to take immediate action, resulting in record-breaking sales and lines
around the block during iPhone releases.
66
Persuasion and Public Opinion
Case: Persuasive Marketing Campaign by a Nike
Nike, the global sportswear brand, effectively uses Robert Cialdini's six principles of
persuasion:
Reciprocation:
Nike regularly offers free resources, such as workout apps, training plans, and access to
exclusive content from athletes. By providing value to customers, Nike encourages brand
loyalty and repeat purchases.
Commitment and Consistency:
Nike's "Just Do It" slogan emphasizes commitment to one's fitness and sports goals. When
customers identify with this commitment, they are more likely to stay consistent in their
athletic pursuits and choose Nike products to support their efforts.
Social Proof:
Nike showcases athletes and everyday people on its website and social media channels,
sharing their success stories and achievements. This social proof demonstrates that Nike's gear
can help individuals reach their fitness goals.
Liking:
Nike often collaborates with popular athletes and celebrities, like Michael Jordan and LeBron
James, making their products more likable to fans of these figures. Their marketing campaigns
also highlight diversity and inclusion, appealing to a broader audience.
Authority:
Nike positions itself as a brand trusted by professional athletes, coaches, and sports experts.
Their advertisements often feature renowned coaches and athletes, lending credibility and
authority to their products.
Scarcity:
Nike occasionally releases limited-edition sneakers or athletic wear. These limited releases
create a sense of urgency and scarcity, leading enthusiasts to camp outside stores or stay
vigilant online to secure these coveted items.
Nike's skillful application of these persuasion principles has helped them maintain their status
as a top sportswear brand. By incorporating reciprocation, commitment, social proof, liking,
authority, and scarcity into their marketing strategies, Nike effectively connects with
customers and motivates them to choose their products for athletic and lifestyle needs.
67
Persuasion and Public Opinion
Chapter Four: Persuasion in Context:
Advertising Campaigns
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
After reading this chapter, you should be able to:

Recognize how advertising serves as a tool
for influencing consumer attitudes, beliefs,
and behaviors.

Analyze various advertising appeals and
techniques are employed in real life
advertisements

Examine the relationship between branding
strategies and their impact on persuasive
advertising.
Advertising is unequivocally the most prevalent mode of persuasion within contemporary
society. As per certain approximations, it is posited that individuals are currently subjected to an
estimated 5,000 advertisements on a daily basis. Commercials consume one-third of television
broadcasting time. Additionally, approximately 60% of newspaper content comprises advertising
materials. By the time most people retire, they will have encountered an extensive exposure to
nearly 140 million advertisements across various media platforms and will have witnessed an
astonishing 2 million television advertisements (Denton).
Advertisements are such a deep-rooted part of everyday life that numerous symbols and
catchphrases employed in advertising become ingrained within our culture. Advertisers
intentionally direct attention toward specific aspects of culture while overlooking others.
Advertising effectively fosters the creation of role models, heroes, and heroines, and it is
commonplace for individuals to readily identify their preferred commercial figures, slogans, and
memes (Denton 259).
Advertising is defined as when certain groups or industries use mass media to communicate and
promote a product, service, candidate, or idea. This definition has several benefits. Firstly, it
acknowledges that the most effective persuasion is tailored to a specific audience. A successful
68
Persuasion and Public Opinion
ad connects with a particular group, addressing their wants, needs, and issues. It grabs their
attention, fulfills their requirements, and provides solutions (Denton 261).
Brands and Branding
Advertising is primarily about persuasion rather than merely conveying information. Its purpose
is to present a product in the market by highlighting how it can fulfill a range of emotional,
social, and other human needs. Companies dedicate significant resources to crafting brand
identities that evoke goodwill and a sense of care for their products (Gass)
A clear case of manufacturing favorable associations can be found in branding. Branding is a
marketing strategy that involves creating a unique and identifiable image, name, logo, or design
that distinguishes a product, service, or company from its competitors in the minds of consumers.
The goal of branding is to establish a strong and positive perception of the brand in the target
audience's consciousness. This perception often includes associations with the brand's quality,
values, reputation, and overall identity. Effective branding helps build customer loyalty, trust,
and recognition, which can lead to increased sales and long-term success for the business.
A fundamental principle of persuasion revolves around creating positive associations between
people's attitudes and the things those attitudes relate to. To achieve this, persuaders often focus
on promoting a particular image or lifestyle. When you purchase a product, you're not only
obtaining the physical item but also aligning yourself with the image or lifestyle associated with
it.
Nike, a renowned sportswear and athletic company, has established a strong brand identity based
on values like empowerment, athleticism, and innovation. Nike's "Just Do It" slogan, for
example, encourages people to push their limits, pursue their athletic goals, and overcome
challenges. Through various marketing campaigns featuring athletes and individuals from
diverse backgrounds, Nike promotes a sense of determination, self-expression, and achievement.
These brand values have helped Nike maintain its position as a leading sportswear brand and
resonate with customers worldwide.
Dove has positioned itself as a brand that celebrates real beauty and self-confidence. Their "Real
Beauty" campaign promotes body positivity and self-acceptance, aiming to empower individuals
to feel comfortable in their own skin.
Advertising and persuasion
Advertisers are facing new challenges due to the prevalence of media in our lives. They need to
distinguish their products or services from others in the market and navigate through the vast
amount of information that bombards consumers daily. Moreover, they must capture the
audience's attention and establish connections with them. As advertising becomes more
advanced, it is crucial for consumers to comprehend how it impacts their choices and way of life.
69
Persuasion and Public Opinion
Often, our spending decisions are influenced by advertisements, and we even develop emotional
bonds with certain product brands. Advertising also plays a significant role in shaping our values
(Borchers 353).
Advertising continually bombards us with persuasive messages conveyed through various media
channels. Advertisers skillfully employ language and visual elements to encourage us to relate to
their messages. Our receptivity to these messages hinges on our emotional state and how we
perceive our needs and values. This identification can manifest in buying the advertised product
or feeling a connection to the brand. In this process, we, as the audience, provide valuable
information that advertisers utilize for audience analysis. Our interests, preferences, and
demographic details all shape how advertisers tailor their messages to target us effectively. This
chapter primarily focuses on consumer goods advertising and the most common advertising
appeals (Borchers).
What are advertising Appeals?
Advertising appeals are persuasive strategies used in marketing and advertising to engage the
audience and motivate them to take action, such as purchasing a product, supporting a cause, or
changing their behavior. These appeals tap into various aspects of human psychology and
emotions to influence consumer decisions. Previous chapters discussed Aristotle’s three main
communication appeals: logos, pathos and ethos.
Throughout the history of marketing and advertising, experts have employed persuasive appeals.
However, contemporary advertisers have expanded beyond Aristotle's three general appeals of
credibility, emotion, and logic. They have developed precise approaches to tailor their marketing
strategies effectively. Learning about these diverse appeals in marketing and advertising enables
them to create more compelling and successful marketing campaigns.
Common Advertising Appeals
The most common advertising appeals used in marketing and advertising can be broadly
categorized into three main types: emotional appeals, transformative appeals, and rationalfunctional appeals. These appeals are employed to connect with consumers on different levels
and persuade them to take specific actions, such as purchasing a product or service (Denton 280)
Emotional Appeals
Emotional appeals are persuasive techniques used in advertising and marketing to evoke
emotional responses in the audience. These appeals aim to connect with consumers on an
70
Persuasion and Public Opinion
emotional level by tapping into their feelings, desires, fears, or aspirations. Emotional appeals
can include a wide range of emotions, such as joy, fear, love, anger, nostalgia, and empathy. The
goal is to create a strong emotional connection between the audience and the product, brand, or
message, which can influence their attitudes, perceptions, and ultimately their behavior, such as
buying a product or supporting a cause.
A significant portion of modern advertising relies on emotions. Emotional appeals cater to
consumers' social and psychological motives for buying products or services. Emotions can drive
purchases, foster empathy, or establish a bond with a brand or product. These appeals encompass
both personal and social aspects. Personal emotional appeals encompass feelings of safety, love,
joy, pride, self-esteem, comfort, ambition, and success, among others. Social emotional appeals
relate to aspects like recognition, respect, acceptance, or status. Some of the most influential
emotional appeals include fear, humor, guilt, and isolation.
Fear Appeal
Fear appeals are a potent form of persuasive communication that aim to elicit fear in the
audience by emphasizing negative consequences if they don't heed the message's
recommendations. These appeals aim to invoke a sense of unease or apprehension in the
audience. They often present potential risks, dangers, or negative consequences associated with
not taking the desired action. By highlighting what could go wrong, fear appeals motivate
individuals to change their behavior. For instance, public health campaigns use fear to
discourage smoking by vividly illustrating the health hazards and potential diseases linked to
tobacco use.
Fear appeals are widespread, workplaces, public health messages, advertising, and more. In
advertising, products like dandruff shampoos, deodorants, mouthwashes, and acne medications
frequently rely on fear, tapping into the fear of social exclusion to motivate consumers to make a
purchase. By leveraging fear, communicators seek to prompt behavioral change and decisionmaking in their audience.
Fear appeals can be effective in persuasive communication when they meet certain conditions.
First, they need to create a perceived threat that is considered relevant by the audience. If people
believe that the danger or negative consequences mentioned in the message could happen to
them, they are more likely to pay attention. Second, the severity of the consequences presented in
the message should be balanced with the audience's susceptibility. If the threat is too severe and
the audience believes they are helpless or immune, it may not be effective. Third, fear appeals
are more effective when they also provide information on how to reduce the threat. This includes
offering a clear and feasible solution or course of action that the audience can take to mitigate the
fear (Borchers).
71
Persuasion and Public Opinion
A fear appeal message should contain several key elements to be effective:
1. Threat Information: Clearly communicate the threat or danger associated with the
behavior you want to change. This includes detailing the potential negative
consequences.
2. Susceptibility: Explain to the audience how they are personally susceptible to the threat.
People are more likely to act if they believe the threat affects them directly.
3. Severity: Emphasize the severity of the consequences. Make it clear that the potential
harm is significant and not to be taken lightly.
4. Efficacy Information: Provide information on how to avoid the threat or mitigate its
effects. Offer specific steps or actions that the audience can take.
5. Response Efficacy: Explain why taking the recommended actions will be effective in
avoiding the threat. This helps the audience believe that they have control over the
situation.
72
Persuasion and Public Opinion
Case: Fear Appeal in “Don’t Text While Driving” Campaign
Imagine a public health campaign aimed at discouraging texting while driving, a behavior
known to be dangerous and potentially life-threatening. In this campaign, a video
advertisement is created. The video begins with a cheerful scene of a young person texting
while driving, seemingly unconcerned. Suddenly, the video takes a dramatic turn. It shows a
simulated car crash, complete with the screeching of brakes and shattering glass, as a result of
the driver's distraction due to texting. The video then displays real-life testimonies of
individuals who have lost loved ones or suffered life-altering injuries due to accidents caused
by texting while driving.
The fear appeal in this example is evident. It vividly portrays the potential negative
consequences of texting while driving: accidents, injuries, and even death. The message is
clear – if you text and drive, you risk your life and the lives of others on the road.
This fear appeal targets individuals who engage in texting while driving or may consider doing
so. It works best for those who perceive the threat as relevant to their own behavior. By
evoking fear and presenting the severity of the consequences, this campaign aims to motivate
people to change their behavior and stop texting while driving.
Fear appeal elements were used effectively to convey the dangers of this behavior and
motivate behavior change:
1. Threat Information: The campaign clearly communicated the threat by highlighting
the potential consequences of texting while driving, such as accidents, injuries, and
fatalities.
2. Susceptibility: The message conveyed that anyone who texts while driving is
susceptible to accidents, emphasizing that this threat affects all individuals who engage
in the behavior.
3. Severity: The severity of the consequences was underscored by showing graphic
depictions of accidents, injuries, and the emotional impact on victims and their
families.
4. Efficacy Information: The campaign provided information on how to avoid the threat
by promoting safer alternatives, such as pulling over to text or using hands-free
devices.
5. Response Efficacy: It explained why taking the recommended actions (not texting
while driving) would be effective in avoiding accidents and injuries. This helped the
audience believe that they could control the situation.
Fear is a strong emotion that has intrigued persuasion researchers. They have tried to figure out
how it can be used to change people's attitudes. Unlike positive emotions like pride or warmth,
which make you feel good, fear makes you want to do something. Unlike anger, which can be
harmful, fear can be used to change attitudes in a helpful way.
73
Persuasion and Public Opinion
However, scaring people successfully is not easy. Just making them afraid doesn't always change
their attitudes. Sometimes, people aren't scared, or they don't pay attention to the message
because they think it doesn't relate to them.
Fear messages always imply that if individuals continue dangerous behaviors, like smoking or
excessive drinking, bad things will happen. None of us wants to think these bad outcomes will
happen to us, so we often deny or distort the message to protect ourselves. Research shows that
people often believe bad things are less likely to happen to them than to others.
Sometimes, a message can scare someone but still not change their attitude. This happens when
the message doesn't connect with the person's beliefs about the problem or doesn't offer a
solution. The drive model emphasizes fear, but we now understand that persuaders need more
than fear to change someone's attitude or behavior. They must convince people that they are at
risk and that following the recommended action will reduce the threat. Messages must work on
both an emotional and a logical level. They need to help individuals understand the problem and,
through persuasive words and suggestions, encourage them to face the danger they're facing
(Wahl).
Fear appeals are ubiquitous in advertising. It's challenging to find ads that don't incorporate some
form of fear. For instance, Volvo has been a prominent user of fear appeals, with their
commercials emphasizing safety over style, gas mileage, or resale value. Insurance companies
also employ fear, preying on concerns about inadequate coverage in various accidents and
calamities.
Products like deodorants, mouthwash, and dandruff shampoos tap into fears of embarrassment,
suggesting that their use will resolve potentially distressing issues. Axe shower gel, on the other
hand, subtly invokes the fear of social exclusion due to bad body odor.
Guilt
74
Persuasion and Public Opinion
A guilt appeal is a persuasive communication strategy that aims to elicit feelings of guilt in the
audience to influence their attitudes or behaviors. It typically works by making individuals feel
responsible or remorseful for not taking a specific action or for engaging in certain behaviors.
Guilt appeals often emphasize the negative consequences of not adhering to the message's
recommendations and may highlight how an individual's actions or inaction can harm others or
violate social norms or values. Environmental and social issue campaigns use guilt to compel
individuals to take steps to address pressing concerns, such as recycling or supporting charitable
causes (Gass).
Guilt is a pervasive and powerful appeal frequently employed in advertising. It leverages our
innate desire to protect and care for our loved ones by urging us to purchase products for their
safety, health, intelligence, and social well-being. Guilt operates through several mechanisms in
advertising. It evokes sympathy for the message or sender, often implying that a particular
product is the only way to express love adequately. For instance, diamond ads suggest that
buying diamonds is the ultimate proof of affection, prompting questions like "if you love her
enough."
Furthermore, guilt can stimulate behavior as a form of compensation for perceived wrongs, like
sending flowers to make amends for missing an appointment. It can also target the desire to
restore a damaged self-image, where sending a gift symbolizes a fresh start. Guilt serves as a
compelling motivator for purchasing the advertised product, effectively establishing a norm of
buying behavior and dictating what is deemed acceptable within caring relationships.
Guilt appeals are often used by charitable organizations, especially in advertisements featuring
deprived children who appear abused, underfed, and in desperate need of help. You've probably
seen these images—the child with a thin face, sad eyes, and a sorrowful expression. These TV
ads are straightforward guilt appeals, meant to make people feel guilty so that they will donate
money to these charitable groups.
Similar to how a fear appeal contains a threat to motivate action, a guilt appeal triggers empathy
to encourage individuals to perform a specific act of kindness. When people empathize with the
hardships faced by deprived children, it should remind them of a societal norm to help those who
are less fortunate. This, in turn, can evoke feelings of guilt, which is an uncomfortable emotion
that people are motivated to lessen—ideally, by donating to charity (O’keefe).
However, people are more likely to donate to a charitable organization when guilt is combined
with efficacy, which means believing that one can effectively participate in the recommended
action. Television messages often include self-efficacy statements like "for L.E100, you can save
a child's life," to show viewers that they can make a meaningful difference.
Guilt messages typically include the following elements:
1. Identification of a Problem or Issue: Guilt messages begin by highlighting a problem
or issue that needs attention. This often involves portraying a situation of suffering,
75
Persuasion and Public Opinion
injustice, or need, such as impoverished children, animals in distress, or environmental
degradation.
2. Personal Responsibility: Guilt messages aim to make the audience feel personally
responsible for addressing the problem. They may suggest that individuals are, in some
way, contributing to or neglecting the issue.
3. Norm Violation: They may frame inaction or lack of support as a violation of societal
norms or moral values. This reinforces the idea that the audience should feel guilty for
not acting.
4. Solution: Guilt messages usually propose a clear and specific solution to the problem.
This could involve making a donation, volunteering time, changing behaviors, or
supporting a particular cause.
Case: "Smoking Kid" campaign initiated by the Egyptian Anti-Smoking Society (EASS) and
UNICEF in 2018
Campaign Message: The campaign aimed to raise awareness about the harmful effects of
smoking in the presence of children, highlighting the risks of exposing them to secondhand
smoke.
Elements of Guilt Appeal:
1. Identification of the Problem: The campaign portrayed a critical issue – adults
smoking in front of children.
2. Emotive Imagery: The basis of the campaign was a powerful video featuring a young
boy named Abdelrahman, who walked up to adults smoking in public and asked them
for a light. His appearance and actions were designed to provoke an emotional
response from viewers.
3. Personal Responsibility: The campaign emphasized that adults bear the responsibility
for protecting children from the dangers of smoking.
4. Norm Violation: Smoking in the presence of children was framed as a violation of
societal norms and a breach of the moral duty to safeguard children's health.
5. Solution: The campaign suggested a clear solution - quit smoking or avoid smoking
around children. It urged viewers to reconsider their actions and make a commitment to
protect children from the harmful effects of smoking. The campaign also conveyed the
message that adults have the power to change their behavior and protect children.
Effectiveness: The "Smoking Kid" campaign gained significant attention and
generated discussions on social media. It successfully leveraged guilt as a powerful
motivator for behavioral change. By highlighting the potential harm inflicted on
innocent children, the campaign encouraged adults to reflect on their actions and
consider quitting smoking or doing so away from children.
76
Persuasion and Public Opinion
Isolation Appeal
The isolation appeal is a persuasive technique commonly used in advertising. It plays on the fear
of being left out or isolated from a group or society if a particular action is not taken, such as
using a product or following a specific behavior. This appeal suggests that failure to comply with
the message's recommendations will lead to social exclusion or isolation, emphasizing the
negative consequences of not adhering to the advertiser's message. Isolation appeals can be
particularly effective in campaigns targeting people's social needs and the desire to belong or be
accepted by others.
Numerous advertisements exploit the fear of isolation and loneliness, tapping into our innate
desire for social connection. Whether it's sharing moments while watching a game or enjoying
gatherings with friends, ads often depict scenarios of close social bonds. These social elements
strongly influence our buying decisions, driven by the desire for recognition, affiliation,
approval, and acceptance. Advertisements suggest that using their products will lead to
popularity and social acceptance. This messaging creates a norm that links friendship with the
consumption of the "right" products.
Here are a few real-life examples of advertisements that utilize the fear of isolation and
loneliness:
1. Coca-Cola's "Share a Coke" Campaign: Coca-Cola's "Share a Coke" campaign
featured personalized bottles and cans with people's names and terms like "Friend,"
"Buddy," or "Family." This encouraged consumers to buy and share Coke with their
loved ones, emphasizing the idea that sharing a Coke fosters social connection.
2. Amazon Prime Video: Amazon Prime Video ads often depict friends and families
gathering to watch popular shows or movies. They suggest that subscribing to their
service can bring people together for shared entertainment experiences.
3. Apple's FaceTime: Apple's FaceTime advertisements often show heartwarming
moments of people using the video call feature to connect with loved ones who may be
far away. These ads evoke the fear of missing out on important moments and highlight
how technology can bridge physical distances.
77
Persuasion and Public Opinion
Humor Appeal
Humor appeal is a persuasion technique used in advertising and communication that relies on
humor, wit, or comedy to capture the audience's attention, make them laugh, and create a
positive association with a product, service, or message. It aims to entertain and amuse the
audience while conveying a specific message or promoting a particular product or idea.
Humorous advertisements constitute a substantial 24 percent of all advertising in the USA. Even
on the internet, where memes have become a powerful tool for social and political commentary,
humor plays a pivotal role. However, it's important to understand that jokes themselves don't
directly persuade; rather, humor often operates indirectly through the peripheral route to
persuasion. One established way humor assists in persuasion is by seizing the audience's
attention and cultivating a favorable view of the source. Getting the audience’s attention is a very
important step in the persuasion process. This phenomenon is evident in the popularity of
comedians like Ellen DeGeneres, Tina Fey, Jim Gaffigan, and Jerry Seinfeld as endorsers. A
comprehensive analysis of humor in advertising underscored its effectiveness in enhancing
attention and fostering positive sentiments toward a brand (Gass 507).
Yet, there's another facet to humor's persuasive potential—it serves as a distraction. Specifically,
the cognitive effort required to comprehend a joke competes with the mental energy needed to
critically analyze the message's substance. Consequently, humor tends to prevent or lessen
counter arguing. For instance, research revealed that individuals exposed to a series of jokes
from late-night comedians were less inclined to scrutinize the statements closely, unlike a control
group that encountered non-comedic versions of the same statements. This suggests that, when
facing a skeptical audience, a persuader could employ humor to ease resistance (Gass 507).
The humor used the advertisement needs to be related the product or goal of the message. The
humor needs to help the audience to understand the message and not distract them. contend that
in some cases, the humor becomes the focal point, overshadowing the essential product attributes
or the ability to remember the brand. Furthermore, there's an argument that humorous
commercials tend to lose their effectiveness more rapidly compared to their non-humorous ads.
This is because, once the audience grasps the humor or punchline, they may begin to disengage
when exposed to the same advertisement repeatedly.
78
Persuasion and Public Opinion
Here are a couple of examples of Egyptian ads that successfully used humor:
1. Vodafone Egypt's "Abou El Abed" Campaign: Vodafone Egypt's "Abou El Abed"
series of commercials features a beloved fictional character known for his humorous and
often mischievous antics. These ads effectively blend humor with relatable everyday
situations, showcasing Vodafone's services while entertaining the audience.
2. Mobinil's "Etganen" Campaign: Mobinil, one of Egypt's major telecom providers (now
part of Orange Egypt), ran the "Etganen" campaign. The word "Etganen" translates to
"become more" in English. The ads humorously portrayed how Mobinil's services can
make people more connected and efficient in their daily lives.
These Egyptian ads used humor to engage viewers, making the brand messages memorable and
creating a strong connection with the audience.
Humor can be effectively used for a wide range of products, but its suitability depends on the
nature of the product and the target audience. Generally, humor works well for products and
services that don't involve serious or life-changing decisions. It's particularly suitable for
consumer goods, entertainment, fast food, and products associated with leisure and enjoyment.
However, for products that involve significant financial investments, health, or safety, a
humorous approach might not be appropriate. In such cases, a more informative or serious tone
might be preferred to convey crucial information and build trust.
Ultimately, the choice of humor in advertising should align with the product, the brand image,
and the preferences of the target audience to achieve the desired persuasive impact.
Story Telling Appeal
Storytelling appeal is a persuasive technique that involves using narratives or stories to engage,
inform, and persuade an audience. It's a method that taps into the power of storytelling to convey
a message, evoke emotions, and connect with the audience on a personal level. This appeal often
focuses on relatable characters, real-life situations, or compelling narratives to make the message
more memorable and persuasive. Storytelling is commonly used in advertising, public relations,
and communication to create a deeper connection with the audience and influence their attitudes
or behaviors.
Here's an example of an advertisement that uses storytelling appeal:
Ad Title: "The Journey Home"
Product: Airline
The advertisement opens with a young woman saying goodbye to her family at an airport. As she
boards the plane, she looks nervous but determined. During the flight, she strikes up a
conversation with an elderly woman seated beside her. The elderly woman shares stories of her
79
Persuasion and Public Opinion
own travels, imparting wisdom and life lessons along the way. The two become fast friends
during the journey.
Upon landing, the young woman disembarks and is greeted by her family. They hug her tightly,
and you can see the joy in their eyes. The elderly woman watches from the plane, smiling
contentedly. The voiceover says, "Every journey is a story waiting to be told. Thank you for
letting us be a part of yours."
This storytelling appeal creates an emotional connection with the audience. It portrays the airline
as more than just a transportation service, but as a facilitator of meaningful experiences and
connections. This can resonate deeply with travelers, making them more likely to choose this
airline for their future journeys.
Personal/Positive emotional appeals
Positive emotional appeals in advertising aim to evoke positive feelings and emotions in the
audience. They can be highly effective in persuading consumers to engage with a product,
service, or message. The goal of a positive emotional appeal is to associate those positive
emotions with a product, service, brand, or message, ultimately influencing consumer behavior.
When consumers think about that product or service, it invokes a sense of warmth and comfort.
Warmth appeals can be highly effective, but their success hinges on their authenticity. The
heartwarming images being presented must genuinely resonate with the audience for the appeal
to be impactful. Here are some of the most common positive emotional appeals:
1. Happiness and Joy: Ads often showcase people experiencing happiness or joy when
using a product or service. This emotional appeal can create a positive association with
the brand.
2. Love and Affection: Many advertisements tap into the emotions of love and affection,
emphasizing relationships and bonding, especially in the context of family and friends.
80
Persuasion and Public Opinion
3. Hope and Inspiration: Advertisers use hope and inspiration to motivate consumers.
They show how a product or service can improve one's life or help achieve personal
goals.
4. Excitement and Adventure: Brands often use the thrill of excitement and adventure to
engage consumers. This appeal is common in ads for travel, sports, and outdoor
activities.
5. Satisfaction and Contentment: Ads may portray individuals as content and satisfied
after using a particular product, conveying the idea that it can fulfill needs and desires.
Imagine an insurance company's advertisement featuring a family gathered around a cozy
living room, smiles on their faces, and a sense of security in their eyes. The message
conveys the peace of mind and satisfaction that comes from knowing their loved ones and
possessions are protected. This ad aims to evoke feelings of contentment and security,
encouraging viewers to consider the company for their insurance needs.
6. Empathy and Compassion: Some advertisements appeal to empathy and compassion,
often seen in charity and social cause campaigns. They aim to evoke emotions that lead to
action, such as donations.
7. Gratitude and Thankfulness: Brands sometimes use messages of gratitude or
thankfulness to convey appreciation to their customers. This can foster loyalty and
positive sentiment. Imagine an ad for a charitable organization. The commercial features
heartwarming scenes of volunteers helping those in need, such as providing meals to the
homeless or assisting in disaster relief efforts. The message emphasizes the importance of
gratitude and encourages viewers to support the organization's mission by showing
thankfulness for the help they receive.
8. Optimism and Positivity: Advertisements that focus on optimism and positivity create a
favorable emotional atmosphere. They show how the product can make life better and
brighter.
9. Nostalgia and Sentimentality: Nostalgic ads take consumers back in time, triggering
feelings of sentimentality and nostalgia. This can be effective in connecting with older
audiences. Imagine an advertisement for a classic brand of chocolate. The ad starts with a
scene of a child enjoying the chocolate with a big smile, then transitions to the same
person as an adult, savoring the same chocolate, evoking a sense of nostalgia for the
simple joys of childhood.
10. Pride and Achievement: Advertisements often feature individuals who feel a sense of
pride and accomplishment after using a product or service. This appeals to consumers'
desires for self-improvement. Imagine an advertisement for a luxury car showcasing a
successful individual driving through a picturesque cityscape. The voiceover highlights
their accomplishments, emphasizing that owning this car is a symbol of achievement.
This appeal taps into viewers' sense of pride and the desire to attain a similar level of
success and recognition.
These positive emotional appeals are powerful tools for advertisers to establish a strong
connection with their audience and motivate them to take action, such as making a purchase or
supporting a cause. The choice of emotional appeal depends on the brand's message, target
audience, and the desired emotional response.
81
Persuasion and Public Opinion
Positive emotional appeals are a powerful tool in advertising and persuasion, known for their
effectiveness in engaging audiences and leaving a lasting impact. These appeals harness
emotions like happiness, joy, and love to create a favorable and memorable impression of a
product, brand, or message. By evoking positive feelings in viewers, such as the warmth of a
family moment or the thrill of an adventure, advertisers capture attention and enhance message
retention. The association of a product or brand with these positive emotions helps build trust
and credibility, as consumers tend to trust and prefer brands that make them feel good. Positive
emotional appeals can influence decision-making, foster brand loyalty, and encourage customer
engagement. Moreover, their impact extends beyond the immediate moment, creating enduring
positive brand perceptions that influence future buying decisions. However, the success of these
appeals depends on factors like audience targeting, authenticity, and alignment with a brand's
values, making it essential for advertisers to use them thoughtfully and meaningfully to
maximize their persuasive power.
Companies that want to build a positive brand image often employ positive emotional appeals.
They associate their brand with values like trust, reliability, and happiness to create a favorable
impression among consumers.
Case: Coca-Cola's "Share a Coke" Campaign
One of the most iconic examples of an ad campaign using positive emotional appeal is CocaCola's "Share a Coke" campaign. Launched in 2014, this campaign aimed to strengthen the
emotional connection between the brand and its consumers.
In this campaign, Coca-Cola replaced its traditional logo on its bottles and cans with popular
first names and terms of endearment like "Friend," "Mom," and "Buddy." The idea was simple
yet powerful: by personalizing their products, Coca-Cola encouraged people to share a Coke
with someone they cared about.
Positive Emotional Appeal: The campaign leveraged emotions like happiness, joy, and
nostalgia. Seeing your name or a friendly term on a Coca-Cola bottle created a sense of
personal connection and brought a smile to consumers' faces.
82
Persuasion and Public Opinion
Effectiveness: The "Share a Coke" campaign was highly effective. It not only boosted sales
and increased consumer engagement but also generated widespread social media sharing as
people posted pictures of their personalized Coke bottles. The positive emotions associated
with the campaign helped Coca-Cola strengthen its brand loyalty and create a memorable,
feel-good experience for consumers.
Case: Vodafone Egypt's "Fakka" Campaign
Vodafone Egypt's "Fakka" campaign is a notable example of an Egyptian ad that effectively
used positive emotional appeal. Launched in 2019, this campaign focused on promoting
financial inclusion and encouraging people to use digital payment services, particularly
Vodafone's own mobile wallet, Vodafone Cash.
Positive Emotional Appeal: The campaign's primary emotional appeal was happiness and
joy. It depicted heartwarming scenes of people celebrating and sharing special moments in
their lives, such as weddings, graduations, and family gatherings. These moments were made
even more special by using Vodafone Cash for transactions, emphasizing the convenience and
security of digital payments.
Effectiveness: The "Fakka" campaign received widespread attention and positive feedback in
Egypt. By associating Vodafone Cash with joyful life events, it created a positive emotional
connection between the brand and its customers. This emotional appeal helped boost the
adoption of digital payment services and positioned Vodafone as a facilitator of happiness and
convenience in people's lives.
Transformative Appeals: Associations
Transformative Appeals in advertising are a set of persuasive techniques designed to
change how consumers perceive a product or brand by associating it with positive qualities and
experiences. Associations are the emotional, visual, or symbolic connections that form in
consumers' minds when they use a product. Using the product
can evoke feelings of happiness, enhance one's appearance,
increase desirability, or boost effectiveness and self esteem.
These appeals seek to establish a deep emotional and
psychological connection between the product and the
consumer, often suggesting that using the product will lead to
personal transformation and fulfillment. They employ a variety
of tactics, such as using visually captivating imagery,
portraying the product as a lifestyle enhancer, and implying
that its use can bring about personal growth and positive
emotions (Perloff).
83
Persuasion and Public Opinion
Transformative Appeals connect with consumers by aligning the product with their
desires and values, presenting it as a symbol of their aspirations. Additionally, they may imply
that using the product will enhance social connections and status. Examples include luxury car
ads linking vehicles to success, cosmetics associating their products with enhanced beauty, and
travel campaigns connecting destinations with personal growth. In essence, these appeals aim to
create a profound emotional bond between the product and consumers, influencing their
purchasing decisions.
McDonald's is a prime example of a company that has effectively used transformative
associations in its advertising. Their famous slogan, "I'm Lovin' It," is a clear demonstration of
this strategy. When you consume a McDonald's meal, their ads suggest that you aren't just
satisfying your hunger; you're embracing a joyful, carefree lifestyle. The commercials often
depict smiling, happy people enjoying their burgers and fries, creating an association between
the product and positive emotions. This transformative appeal makes customers feel that eating
at McDonald's enhances their happiness and overall well-being.
Case: Nike's "Just Do It" Campaign.
Background: Nike, a renowned sportswear and athletic shoe brand, introduced the "Just Do
It" campaign in 1988. This campaign aimed to reposition the brand and create a profound
emotional connection with consumers.
Campaign Strategy: The central message of the "Just Do It" campaign was to inspire and
empower individuals to overcome obstacles, pursue their athletic goals, and, metaphorically,
face life's challenges head-on. Nike sought to associate its brand not just with sports but with
the idea of personal transformation and determination.
Execution:
1. Celebrity Endorsement: Nike signed endorsement deals with prominent athletes like
Michael Jordan, Serena Williams, and LeBron James. These athletes were seen as
symbols of dedication and success, aligning perfectly with the campaign's message.
2. Emotional Storytelling: Nike created emotionally charged advertisements that told
powerful stories of individuals achieving their dreams against all odds. The ads
emphasized personal growth, determination, and the idea that anyone could become a
champion in their own right.
3. Slogans: The iconic "Just Do It" slogan became synonymous with Nike and
encapsulated the spirit of taking action, pushing boundaries, and striving for
excellence.
Effectiveness: Nike's "Just Do It" campaign is a prime example of transformational appeal
through association. By connecting its brand with personal growth, determination, and the
indomitable human spirit, Nike created a lasting emotional bond with consumers and solidified
its position as an iconic and influential brand in the world of sports and beyond.
84
Persuasion and Public Opinion
Rational-Functional Appeals
Advertisers employ another tactic to promote a product, service, brand, image, or way of life:
appealing to reason. This approach offers reliable, rational justifications for why someone should
make a purchase or agree with a particular viewpoint. By emphasizing logical reasoning, the
advertising campaign focuses on what holds significance, distinguishes between positive and
negative aspects, defines trends, identifies correctness, and heightens public consciousness
regarding a specific message.
Rational-functional appeals in advertising focus on the practical and logical aspects of a product
or service. They aim to persuade consumers by providing clear, factual information about the
product's features, benefits, and performance. These appeals appeal to the rational side of
decision-making and emphasize how the product can meet consumers' specific needs. The
decision to use a product can be driven by "rational" motives, which encompass factors like
comfort, convenience, health benefits, as well as considerations of quality, price, performance,
and reliability.
Rational-functional appeals are commonly used in advertising when advertisers want to
emphasize the practical, logical benefits of a product or service. These appeals are effective
when consumers are making decisions based on rational considerations, such as quality, price,
convenience, or specific product features. For example, advertisements for household appliances
often focus on their efficiency and convenience, appealing to consumers' rational need for these
attributes.
85
Persuasion and Public Opinion
Rational-functional appeals focus on the following aspects:
1. Information and Facts: They provide clear, accurate, and relevant information about the
product, service, or idea being promoted. This can include product specifications,
features, benefits, or data to support claims.
2. Problem-Solution Approach: They identify a problem or need and present the
advertised product or service as the solution. This approach emphasizes how the product
can address specific consumer needs or issues.
3. Comparative Advertising: Rational-functional appeals may compare the advertised
product or service to competitors, highlighting its superiority in terms of quality, price, or
performance.
4. Statistics and Evidence: They use statistics, research findings, expert endorsements, or
customer testimonials to support claims and build credibility.
Case Study: Apple's "Get a Mac" Campaign
Background: Apple's "Get a Mac" campaign, which ran from 2006 to 2009, is a prime
example of rational-functional appeals in advertising. The campaign featured two characters:
Justin Long as "Mac" and John Hodgman as "PC." The ads depicted humorous scenarios in
which Mac and PC users discussed various attributes of their respective computers.
Rational-Functional Appeals: Fact and Information, comparative
1. Performance: In the ads, Mac is often portrayed as sleek, fast, and hassle-free,
emphasizing the superior performance of Apple computers. For example, Mac
consistently boasts about his speed and reliability compared to PC, who frequently
encounters technical issues and slowdowns.
2. Ease of Use: Apple's campaign highlights the user-friendly nature of its products. Mac
characterizes Apple computers as intuitive and straightforward, appealing to consumers
who value a simple and hassle-free user experience.
3. Virus Protection: One recurring theme in the campaign is security. Mac frequently
mentions that he doesn't get viruses, highlighting the rational benefit of enhanced
security and reliability in Apple computers compared to PCs.
Effectiveness: Apple's "Get a Mac" campaign was highly effective in conveying rationalfunctional appeals. It capitalized on consumers' concerns about performance, ease of use, and
security when choosing a computer. By using humor and relatable scenarios, Apple
successfully communicated the logical advantages of its products.
86
Persuasion and Public Opinion
Case Study: Nissan's "Built for the Human Race" Campaign
Background: Nissan’s "Built for the Human Race" campaign, launched in 2021, serves as an
excellent example of rational-functional appeals in advertising. The campaign aimed to
promote the brand's line of hybrid vehicles, emphasizing practical benefits such as fuel
efficiency, sustainability, and affordability.
Rational-Functional Appeals:
1. Fuel Efficiency: Nissan emphasized the fuel efficiency of its hybrid vehicles,
highlighting how they could save consumers money on gas in the long run. The
rational appeal here is cost-effectiveness.
2. Sustainability: The campaign stressed the environmental benefits of hybrid
technology, underlining how choosing a Nissan hybrid contributed to a greener planet.
This rational appeal targeted consumers concerned about reducing their carbon
footprint.
3. Affordability: Toyota positioned its hybrid vehicles as affordable options,
emphasizing lower running costs and potential tax incentives. The rational appeal here
is cost savings over time.
Effectiveness: Nissan’s "Built for the Human Race" campaign effectively conveyed rationalfunctional appeals, particularly targeting environmentally conscious and budget-conscious
consumers. By highlighting the practical advantages of its hybrid vehicles, Toyota aimed to
persuade potential buyers to consider the brand for their next vehicle purchase.
87
Persuasion and Public Opinion
Chapter Five: Persuasion in Context: Public
Relations Campaigns for Corporations and
Brands
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
After reading this chapter, you should be able to:

Understand various persuasion techniques
employed in public relations campaigns for
corporations and brands.

Analyze and evaluate the effectiveness of
different persuasive campaigns conducted by
Egyptian brands

Examine the significance of message
consistency and alignment with brand identity in
shaping public perception and consumer
behavior.
In today's information-rich world, the skill of influencing attitudes, behaviors, and opinions is
vital. This chapter explores the art and science of persuasion in the realm of public relations. It
uncovers the strategies and techniques used by PR professionals to effectively communicate their
messages. From creating engaging stories to using emotions and social validation, this chapter
reveals the diverse tools employed to shape public opinion and attain communication goals. In an
era where perception often becomes reality, comprehending the fundamentals of persuasion is
crucial for PR experts.
In this chapter, we will explore how public campaigns, such as advertising and public relations
campaigns, serve as powerful tools of persuasion in our society. We will delve into the
definitions, components, processes, and various forms of public relations campaigns.
Additionally, we will examine the persuasive techniques employed in public relations campaigns
to shape public opinions and behaviors.
Public Relations (PR) is fundamentally about persuasion. Its main goal is to influence people to
change what they think, how they feel, or what they do. Sometimes, people think PR is all about
88
Persuasion and Public Opinion
tricky tactics, like telling lies, manipulating stories, or making things seem worse than they are.
This can give the impression that PR is just a way to react when something bad happens to a
company or person.
But PR isn't about being manipulative. It's actually about being proactive. PR is all about
building strong relationships between a company, organization, or individuals and the public.
And it often does this before anything bad even happens. Thus, PR is the continuing use of
communication to create, keep, and nurture positive relationships with the public (Wahl 146).
Foundations of Persuasive Public Relations Campaigns
Persuasion is the lifeblood of public relations (PR), essential for shaping public perception,
building trust, and achieving communication goals. In the PR realm, persuasion is the art of
influencing opinions, attitudes, and behaviors, whether it's fostering goodwill for an
organization, promoting a new product, or managing a crisis. PR practitioners employ persuasive
strategies like crafting compelling narratives, utilizing credible spokespersons, and leveraging
social proof to sway public opinion. In an age of information overload, effective persuasion sets
PR campaigns apart, enabling organizations to connect with their audiences, foster lasting
relationships, and ultimately achieve their communication objectives. It's the prerequisite that
turns communication into influence (Wahl).
In the realm of public relations, persuading individuals to change their behaviors or opinions
requires a well-structured approach. PR professionals must develop and consistently convey key
messages and themes, ensuring that these messages are not only memorable but also associated
with the organization they represent.
The PR process follows a standardized model, characterized by extensive research into public
opinion, the implementation of carefully designed programs based on research findings, and
rigorous evaluation of program effectiveness. During the planning phase, which is a pivotal step,
both primary and secondary research is conducted to understand the client's needs. This research
informs the identification of target audiences, communication channels, and campaign strategies.
Setting clear goals, objectives, and crafting persuasive messages and themes are integral
components of this phase (Wahl).
Research plays a dual role in persuasion within PR: first, it shapes how PR practitioners
approach the campaign by considering public opinion, allowing it to influence the organization.
Second, PR professionals utilize public opinion to create specific messages and themes aimed at
persuading individuals to adopt certain thoughts, actions, or behaviors. This interplay between
public opinion and PR efforts underscores the importance of research in driving effective
persuasion.
89
Persuasion and Public Opinion
Public Relations Campaigns Defined
“A public relations campaign is a strategically planned and coordinated effort to communicate
specific messages and achieve defined goals and objectives with a target audience. It involves a
series of planned actions and activities designed to shape public perception, influence opinions,
and ultimately build or maintain a positive reputation for an organization, individual, product, or
cause” (PRSA, 2018). In essence, A public relations campaign is a series of planned activities
that are designed to achieve a specific public relations goal. Public relations campaigns can be
used to build brand awareness, promote a new product or service, or manage a crisis.
Public relations (PR) is defined in various ways, but at its core, it involves managing
communication between an organization and its various audiences, often referred to as "publics."
The field of PR serves three primary functions:
1. Influence and Control: PR aims to shape public perceptions and behavior in favor of the
organization. It seeks to control how people think about and interact with the
organization.
2. Responsive Communication: PR is not only proactive but also reactive. It involves
responding to external developments, challenges, or opportunities that may arise,
ensuring the organization remains adaptable.
3. Building Mutual Relationships: One of PR's central goals is to establish mutually
beneficial relationships among all the different publics associated with an organization.
This involves fostering positive interactions and outcomes for both parties.
In summary, PR encompasses managing communication, influencing perceptions and actions,
responding to external factors, and fostering positive, mutually beneficial relationships with
various stakeholders (Denton 230).
In the dynamic landscape of modern business, effective communication is the linchpin that holds
together an organization's reputation, relationships, and success. Welcome to the chapter on
Public Relations (PR) strategies for businesses and corporations, where we delve into the
multifaceted world of communication, perception, and influence.
In this chapter, we will explore how businesses and corporations use the power of PR to navigate
an ever-evolving marketplace. We'll uncover the key persuasion techniques they employ to
manage their public image, engage with stakeholders, and achieve their strategic goals.
Persuasion holds a pivotal role in PR campaigns for businesses, serving multiple critical
purposes. One primary objective is shaping public perception, as these campaigns aim to
influence how the public views a company or brand. Effective persuasion can help build a
positive image and reputation, attracting customers, partners, and investors. Moreover,
persuasion contributes to establishing credibility for a business. When a company communicates
its message convincingly, it is more likely to be perceived as trustworthy and reliable
90
Persuasion and Public Opinion
Additionally, persuasion plays a vital role in crisis management. During times of crisis or
negative publicity, PR professionals employ persuasion techniques to mitigate damage and
regain public trust. Beyond crisis situations, businesses need to persuade potential customers to
choose their products or services. PR campaigns are instrumental in highlighting value, benefits,
and unique selling points, ultimately driving sales.
Businesses often engage in corporate social responsibility (CSR) and environmental, social, and
governance (ESG) initiatives, where persuasion is crucial in conveying the importance of these
efforts to the public and garnering support. Moreover, in a competitive marketplace, the ability to
persuade customers to choose your product or service over others is a significant advantage.
Businesses and corporations employ various types of public relations (PR) campaigns to achieve
their goals and manage their public image. This chapter will look at some types of PR campaigns
conducted by businesses and corporations:
1. Product Launch Campaigns: These campaigns focus on introducing new products or
services to the market. They aim to generate excitement, build anticipation, and drive
sales.
2. Crisis/Reputational Management Campaigns: In response to emergencies, scandals, or
negative incidents, businesses run crisis management campaigns to address the issues,
protect their reputation, and regain public trust.
3. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Campaigns: CSR campaigns showcase a
company's commitment to social and environmental responsibility. They highlight
philanthropic efforts, sustainability initiatives, and community involvement.
4. Brand Awareness Campaigns: Businesses run brand awareness campaigns to increase
recognition and visibility among the target audience. These campaigns may involve
advertising, content marketing, and public events.
5. Event Marketing Campaigns: Businesses organize or sponsor events to engage with
their target audience, launch products, and create memorable experiences.
Strategic Persuasive Objectives of Organizations
When crafting strategic objectives for public relations campaigns, several key considerations
come into play. Firstly, it's vital to define the overarching goal and the time frame within which
you aim to achieve it. Whether your objective is short-term, such as promoting a specific
product, or long-term, like enhancing the company's reputation, this temporal dimension will
significantly influence your approach.
Strategic objectives can typically fall into one of three categories, depending on their intended
audience and purpose:
1. Informational Objectives: Informational objectives are primarily concerned with creating
awareness. They aim to inform your target audience about a product, company, or specific issue
91
Persuasion and Public Opinion
by sharing relevant information and highlighting key attributes. These objectives serve as
foundational building blocks for generating awareness and understanding.
Example: Brand: Apple


Objective: Launching a new iPhone model.
Approach: Apple uses keynote events, website updates, and social media teasers to
inform the audience about the new features, design, and functionalities of their products.
2. Motivational Objectives: Motivational objectives take a more comprehensive approach. They
are designed to educate and inform your target audience in a way that encourages desired
behaviors or activities. Achieving motivational objectives involves not only sharing information
but also instigating attitude changes and influencing behaviors. These objectives are often more
complex due to their multifaceted nature.
Example: Brand: Nike


Objective: Encouraging more people to engage in regular physical activity.
Approach: Nike's "Just Do It" campaign combines educational content, motivational
stories, and partnerships with athletes to inspire individuals to lead an active lifestyle.
3. Reputational Objectives: Reputational objectives are closely tied to significant corporate
events or crises. These objectives can be both short-term and long-term in nature, depending on
the specific circumstances. Their primary aim is to alter perceptions, rebuild trust, and enhance
confidence in the organization. Reputational objectives are critical in times of crisis management
or when a company seeks to enhance its standing within the public's eye.
Example: Brand: Toyota


Objective: Restoring trust after a series of product recalls.
Approach: Toyota implemented a long-term strategy to rebuild its reputation by
enhancing quality control, increasing transparency, and actively engaging with customers
through initiatives like the "Toyota Customer First" program.
Case: Volkswagen 2015 Scandal Campaign Volkswagen 2015 Scandal Campaign
In September 18, 2015, the U.S. Environmental Standards Agency (EPA) publicly filed
a Notice of Violation of the Clean Air Act to the Volkswagen Group. It accused VW of
designing “defeat device” software and installing it in 500,000 diesel vehicles to intentionally
trick regulators and deceive the EPA’s emissions tests. VW admitted this deception.
92
Persuasion and Public Opinion
Researchers examined 40,000 tweets in the 10 days after the news came out. Three
main concerns were voiced: loss of trust in VW, sales staffs worried about their livelihoods,
and alarm at the implications to health with so many VWs on the road with higher emissions.
VW Response:
U.S. VW stopped posting to Facebook and Twitter on Friday, September 18, the day the news
broke in the United States. The social media accounts remained dormant for one full week,
with no responses to comments. Later, the U.S. CEO, posted a statement on the accounts. On
the ninth day, VW posted a frequently asked questions page directing customers to a customer
care phone number and e-mail address. However, Twitter was exploding with consumer
outrage.
What was the strategic objective of the organization?
Was this a successful response to the crisis?
Evaluate Public Relation Campaigns by Brands and Corporations
Coca Cola Public Relations Campaign
Coca-Cola Company jumped on the anti-obesity bandwagon when it launched its
“Coming Together” communications campaign. The campaign’s message was summed up in a
two-minute introductory video, which announced, “Beating obesity will take action by all of
us based on one simple, commonsense fact: All calories matter, no matter where they come
from, including Coca-Cola and everything else with calories.” Two days later, a video titled
“Be OK” launched. It announced that a can of Coca-Cola provides “140 happy calories to
spend on extra happy activities.”
What was the strategic objective of the campaign?
Coca-Cola's "Coming Together" campaign, launched in 2013, had primarily reputational
objectives. The campaign aimed to address growing concerns about the role of sugary soft
drinks in rising obesity rates and health-related issues. Coca-Cola wanted to change the public
perception of the company from a contributor to health problems to a responsible corporate
citizen that cared about public health.
Which appeals were used in the campaign?
It was a call for the public to join the company in its efforts to fight obesity and an
attempt to inform the public about Coca-Cola’s efforts.
See campaign: (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SKi2A76YJlc)
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yfh0BeNMxGY)
93
Persuasion and Public Opinion
M&M'S to Red Nose Day Campaign
M&M'S launched a movement to raise money and awareness for the first U.S. Red Nose Day,
a campaign dedicated to raising money for children and young people living in poverty by
simply having fun and making people laugh.
M&M started off with a $750,000 donation from M&M'S to Red Nose Day Fund and then we
rallied our enormous M&M'S fan base to help us make a difference by making someone laugh.
When fans made someone laugh and made it known with hashtag #MakeMLaugh across social
media, a dollar went to Red Nose Day from M&M'S, up to $250,000.
In a multi-faceted campaign, the company united celebrities, influencers and M&M'S fans
across the country to #MakeMLaugh.
What was the strategic objective of the campaign?
Which appeals were used in the campaign?
94
Persuasion and Public Opinion
Chapter Six: Persuasion in Context: Public
Relations Campaigns for Social Change
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
After reading this chapter, you should be able to:







Comprehend the role of persuasion in advocacy,
social movements, and public service campaigns

Examine how persuasion techniques are employed
to effect changes in attitudes, beliefs, and
behaviors

Differentiate between diverse persuasion strategies
used in public relations campaigns, such as
informational appeals, motivational appeals, and
reputational appeals.

Evaluate Egyptian Campaigns
"Just Say No" (anti-drug campaign)
"It Can Wait" (anti-texting and driving campaign)
"Give a Hoot, Don't Pollute" (littering and pollution)
"Click It or Ticket" (A seat belt safety campaign)
"Think Before You Speak" (anti-bullying campaign)
"Breast Cancer Awareness: Think Pink"
These slogans have been used to effectively convey important messages and promote
positive behaviors in various public awareness campaigns. These iconic symbols are widely
recognized as the faces of public information campaigns in the United States. Yet, it's essential to
understand that these campaigns encompass far more than catchy slogans. They are meticulously
planned and structured initiatives aimed at shaping health or social attitudes through effective
communication strategies. Within the domain of public relations campaigns aimed at social
change, the art of persuasion assumes a pivotal role. This chapter delves deeply into the dynamic
95
Persuasion and Public Opinion
relationship between persuasion and advocacy, emphasizing their significant role in shaping
public sentiment and catalyzing societal shifts.
Social Advocacy Campaigns Defined
Advocacy campaigns are organized, strategic efforts aimed at promoting a particular cause, idea,
or viewpoint, typically with the goal of influencing public opinion, policies, or behaviors. These
campaigns are often used to advocate for social change, raise awareness about specific issues, or
lobby for legislative action. Advocacy campaigns employ various communication and persuasion
techniques, such as public relations, advertising, social media, grassroots organizing, and
lobbying, to advance their objectives. They are frequently associated with non-profit
organizations, activist groups, and governmental agencies working to address important societal
issues, from environmental conservation to human rights and public health.
Social Advocacy campaigns come in various forms, each designed to promote a specific message
or cause. Common types of advocacy campaigns include:
1. Non-profit Promotion: These campaigns are designed to raise awareness about and
support for non-profit organizations. They often seek donations or volunteers to further a
charitable cause.
2. Issue Advocacy: These campaigns focus on promoting a particular issue or cause, such
as environmental conservation, gender equality, or civil rights. They aim to influence
public opinion and encourage action.
3. Awareness Campaigns: These campaigns seek to raise awareness about specific
problems or challenges, such as disease prevention, substance abuse, or social justice
issues. They aim to inform the public and generate support for change.
4. Social Advocacy: Social advocacy campaigns aim to bring about societal change, such as
ending discrimination or promoting tolerance.
5. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): Some advocacy campaigns are initiated by
businesses to promote their responsible and ethical practices. These campaigns often
emphasize a company's commitment to sustainability, diversity, or community support.
Persuasion plays a crucial role in social advocacy campaigns, which are organized efforts to
bring about positive societal change. These campaigns aim to influence public opinion, attitudes,
and behaviors on issues ranging from civil rights to environmental conservation. Persuasion is
the means by which advocates seek to motivate individuals and communities to support their
cause and take action. In essence, persuasion in social advocacy campaigns is about crafting
compelling narratives, using persuasive appeals effectively, and strategically communicating to
mobilize support, change perceptions, and drive meaningful change in society.
96
Persuasion and Public Opinion
Persuasion is the means by which advocates seek to motivate individuals and communities to
support their cause and take action. Here's how persuasion operates in the context of social
advocacy campaigns:
Shaping Public Opinion: Advocacy campaigns often start by shaping public opinion.
Persuasion techniques are used to present an issue or cause in a way that resonates with
the target audience. This can involve creating compelling narratives, sharing personal
stories, and providing factual information to build empathy and understanding.
Raising Awareness: One of the primary goals of social advocacy is to raise
awareness about an issue. Persuasion is used to capture the audience's attention and
convey the urgency and importance of the problem. Emotional appeals, storytelling, and
visual content are frequently employed to make the message memorable.
Changing Attitudes: Persuasion campaigns work to change or influence existing
attitudes and beliefs. Advocates use various persuasive appeals, such as emotional,
rational, or moral appeals, to encourage individuals to see the issue from a different
perspective. They may challenge misconceptions, stereotypes, or biases associated with
the problem.
Motivating Action: The ultimate objective of social advocacy is to motivate people to
take action. Persuasion is instrumental in convincing individuals that their involvement
can make a difference. Calls to action are often framed persuasively, emphasizing the
positive impact of participating in the cause.
When are social issue campaigns likely to succeed?
Research has outlined specific actions that campaign planners should follow to enhance the
probability of success. Successful campaigns often share common practices (Wahl):
1. Audience Understanding: It's crucial to thoroughly comprehend the audience and craft
messages that align with their needs, existing beliefs, and the roles those beliefs play in
their lives. To increase the likelihood of success, campaign planners must invest time in
audience research. This involves understanding the demographics, values, attitudes, and
behaviors of the target audience. By tailoring messages to align with these factors,
campaigns can establish a stronger connection with the audience. When messages address
the audience's preexisting attitudes and fulfill their specific needs, individuals are more
likely to engage with and respond positively to the campaign.
2. Cultural Relevant Message: Messages should resonate with the cultural attributes of a
specific subgroup and be customized to the distinctive qualities of the target audience.
This customization encourages central-route processing, where individuals engage deeply
with the message. Recognizing and respecting cultural diversity is essential in today's
globalized world. Campaigns should not only acknowledge cultural differences but also
embrace them. Messages that are culturally relevant and sensitive are more likely to
resonate with specific subgroups within a diverse population. This cultural tailoring
97
Persuasion and Public Opinion
fosters central-route processing, which means that individuals are more deeply engaged
with and influenced by the message because it aligns with their cultural background and
experiences.
3. Employ Multichannel Coordination and Message Consistency: To maximize
campaign effectiveness, it's crucial to ensure that messages are consistent across various
media platforms and over time. Coordination means that the same message is
communicated through different channels, such as TV, radio, social media, and
community events.
4. Community Engagement and Involvement: Effective campaigns often actively engage
with local communities. This involvement can take the form of community events,
partnerships with local organizations, or encouraging grassroots participation. For
instance, a campaign promoting healthy eating might collaborate with local farmers'
markets or schools to organize nutrition workshops or healthy cooking classes,
developing a sense of community involvement.
5. Promote Positive Behavior Instead of Stopping Negative Behavior: Behavior change
campaigns can be more successful when they encourage the adoption of new, positive
behaviors rather than focusing solely on stopping dysfunctional ones. It is often easier to
persuade people to start doing something beneficial than convincing them to cease
harmful actions.
Persuasive Health Campaigns
Public health campaigns are strategic, organized efforts designed to promote and protect public
health by informing, educating, and motivating individuals and communities to adopt healthier
behaviors and make informed decisions regarding their health. These campaigns are typically
initiated and led by public health authorities, governmental agencies, non-profit organizations, or
advocacy groups.
Health campaigns aren't geared towards marketing products or services but rather towards
educate and influencing the general public on diverse health-related topics. These campaigns
aimed at transforming health-related behaviors, altering attitudes, and shaping beliefs concerning
health. They also address social and environmental factors that impact health behaviors. These
efforts primarily target specific populations that are susceptible to particular health issues or
concerns (Wahl).
Motivation is a critical force within health campaigns, driving individuals to make healthier
choices and transform harmful habits. While motivating people toward positive health decisions
is vital, persuaders must also confront the appeal of certain behaviors. These behaviors, despite
their known risks, can be enticing due to their immediate pleasure, convenience, or social
rewards. Convincing individuals to prioritize long-term health gains over instant satisfaction is
no easy task (Wahl 230).
Many effective campaigns often enhance people's understanding of various health concerns, such
as quitting smoking or adopting healthier eating habits. However, even when some campaigns
98
Persuasion and Public Opinion
seem to modify behavior in the short run, they typically affect our intention to change rather than
the behavior itself. This underscores the idea that merely increasing awareness is insufficient.
Pro-social health campaigns are unlikely to bring about substantial changes in behavior unless
they align with individuals' beliefs and the beliefs endorsed by their social circles. According to
du Pré (2013), “the promoter must know the audience, and he or she must consider not just why
audience members should act in recommended ways but also why they find it difficult to do so”
(p. 341).
du Pré highlighted that the most effective health campaigns are those that address the varied
motivations of their audiences. For instance, a specific target group might seek a comprehensive
understanding of the causes and characteristics of a chronic illness, prompting the need for
detailed explanations, terminology definitions, the latest research findings, or updates on policy
matters. At the same time, other message recipients may prefer an emotional perspective when it
comes to the same chronic illness; they may already possess the technical knowledge but require
emotional triggers, such as fear, to take action or establish a personal connection with the
message.
Health Belief Model Factors:
Assuming that people will automatically change their behavior based solely on a health message
is a common misconception. For instance, advising individuals to quit smoking in a health
campaign may be persuasive, but its effectiveness relies on providing compelling reasons for
them to quit. In essence, individuals are more likely to alter their health-related behavior if:
1. They understand that maintaining their current behavior will lead to negative
consequences.
2. The negative consequences of their current behavior are significant.
3. Changing their behavior will result in a desirable outcome.
4. The time, money, and effort required for change are justified.
5. They encounter a novel or attention-grabbing stimulus, such as a close call with danger, a
frightening image, or an attractive incentive. This fifth aspect is known as a "cue to
action" and is a vital component of the health belief model.
In summary, the cue to action, as the fifth tenet, plays a crucial role in motivating individuals to
take action, but it must be attention-grabbing to be effective.
"Buckle Up for Life: A Seatbelt Safety Campaign"
Overview: "Buckle Up for Life" is a comprehensive seatbelt safety campaign designed to
address the crucial aspects of the Health Belief Model. The campaign aims to persuade
individuals to adopt seatbelt usage as a regular behavior by addressing the five key factors:
Understanding Consequences: The campaign begins by educating the target audience about
the potential consequences of not wearing seatbelts. It emphasizes that failing to buckle up can
lead to severe injuries or even fatalities in accidents.
99
Persuasion and Public Opinion
Significant Negative Consequences: Through powerful testimonials and real-life stories of
survivors, the campaign vividly portrays the significant negative consequences of not wearing
seatbelts. It showcases the physical and emotional toll accidents can take on individuals and
their families.
Desirable Outcome: To motivate behavior change, "Buckle Up for Life" emphasizes the
desirable outcomes of seatbelt use. It highlights statistics and testimonials demonstrating how
seatbelt usage can prevent injuries and save lives during accidents.
Justifying Time and Effort: The campaign provides practical information on how simple and
quick it is to buckle up. It debunks common myths about seatbelt discomfort and
inconvenience, making it clear that the time, money, and effort required for this change are
minimal compared to the potential benefits.
Results: The campaign has achieved remarkable success in increasing seatbelt usage rates
among the target audience. Surveys and data analysis indicate that understanding the
consequences, recognizing significant negative outcomes, highlighting desirable outcomes,
justifying the time and effort, and employing attention-grabbing cues to action have
collectively contributed to positive behavioral changes.
"HealthyU: Childhood Obesity Prevention Campaign"
Overview: The "HealthyU" campaign is a comprehensive effort aimed at preventing
childhood obesity by addressing the five key aspects of the Health Belief Model:
Understanding Consequences: The campaign begins by educating parents and caregivers
about the consequences of childhood obesity. It emphasizes that obesity can lead to various
health problems in children, including diabetes, heart disease, and low self-esteem.
Significant Negative Consequences: To drive home the message, the campaign shares reallife stories of children who have struggled with obesity and its physical and emotional toll. It
includes interviews with healthcare professionals who explain the long-term health risks
associated with childhood obesity.
Desirable Outcome: "HealthyU" promotes the desirable outcome of keeping children healthy
and happy. It showcases success stories of families who have adopted healthier lifestyles,
focusing on improved physical fitness, higher energy levels, and increased self-confidence.
Justifying Time and Effort: The campaign provides practical resources, such as easy-tofollow meal plans and fun exercise routines, to help parents integrate healthier habits into their
daily lives. It emphasizes that the time, money, and effort required for these changes are well
worth the long-term health benefits for their children.
Cue to Action: To capture attention, the campaign features engaging visuals of children
participating in active and enjoyable activities. It also includes endorsements from celebrity
100
Persuasion and Public Opinion
parents who share their commitment to keeping their kids healthy. These elements serve as
cues to action, encouraging parents to take immediate steps toward a healthier lifestyle for
their families.
Results: "HealthyU" has had a significant impact on childhood obesity prevention. Surveys
and data analysis reveal that by addressing the Health Belief Model factors, the campaign has
successfully influenced parental behavior.
As previously stated, target audiences need to be motivated in order to make desired behavioral
changes. One significant motivator is fear, and it’s been used at length to get people to adopt
healthy behaviors as well as change unhealthy ones. While it may be tempting to design a
message that scares an audience with gruesome or shocking images, fear appeals should be used
with caution when it comes to health messages. Eliciting excessive amounts of fear in target
audiences can backfire, causing them either to dismiss the message as silly or to avoid the
message altogether out of extreme fear.
When evaluating threatening messages, individuals typically engage on two distinct levels.
Firstly, they assess their personal susceptibility to the negative health consequences discussed in
the message, a concept referred to as "danger control". For instance, when exposed to a message
addressing protection against coronavirus, individuals often estimate the severity of the
coronavirus threat for themselves.
Secondly, message recipients also consider their capacity to prevent the negative outcome, which
is termed "fear control". For example, an individual contemplating the risks associated with the
coronavirus assesses their ability to avoid contracting the virus and their capacity to cope with
potential illness. For a message to be effective, both aspects of control, danger and fear, must
attain high levels of consideration and confidence among the message's recipients (Wahl 232).
Imagine a public health campaign designed to encourage people to quit smoking by emphasizing
the dangers of tobacco use.
Danger Control: People exposed to the campaign message evaluate their personal risk related to
smoking. They consider how severe the consequences of smoking (e.g., lung cancer, heart
disease) could be for them. The campaign might use vivid images of diseased lungs or
testimonies from former smokers who have suffered health issues.
Fear Control: Message recipients also assess their ability to take action and cope with the
emotional aspects of quitting. This includes considering if they have the willpower and resources
to quit smoking and whether they can manage the anxiety, cravings, and stress associated with
quitting.
For the campaign to be effective, both danger and fear control must be addressed. The message
should convey the severity of health risks associated with smoking while offering practical
101
Persuasion and Public Opinion
resources like quit-smoking programs, support groups, and nicotine replacement therapies to
help individuals cope with the challenges of quitting.
In the realm of health campaigns, not all are equally effective. Regardless of the health issue or
the persuasion theory driving the message, the most successful campaigns share certain
characteristics.
Understanding the Audience: One vital aspect is audience analysis, which is always a top
priority in persuasion. Message creators aim to comprehend the demographic and attitudinal
traits of their target audiences. To do this, they often conduct surveys and host focus group
interviews to uncover the strongest attitudes and beliefs held by these individuals. Additionally,
audience analysis explores reasons for current behaviors and financial constraints that may
hinder behavioral changes, such as limited income preventing the purchase of healthy food to
prevent diseases like diabetes.
Creating Awareness: Another crucial component of a winning campaign is the ability to raise
awareness about a health problem and its potential solutions. Similar to the cues to action in the
health belief model, awareness entails capturing and holding the audience's attention for a lasting
impact. It also involves instilling a sense of urgency, prompting the audience to view the health
issue as significant, understand its personal relevance, and feel motivated enough to take action.
Not all pro-social health campaigns are created equally. Regardless of the health topic, or the
theory driving the persuasive message, the most successful campaigns have some common
characteristics. One important component is audience analysis, an issue that is always at the
forefront of persuasion. Message designers want to understand the demographic and attitudinal
characteristics of their target audiences. More specifically, they often conduct surveys and focus
group interviews to get at the strongest attitudes and beliefs held by these individuals. Other
questions of audience analysis have to do with reasons for targets’ current behaviors, as well as
financial or economic factors that prevent them from making important behavioral changes (e.g.,
perceived limited income that prevents buying healthy food to prevent diabetes). Besides
audience analysis, another key component of a successful campaign is being able to create an
awareness of the health problem and its solutions. As with the cues to action from the health
belief model, awareness means grabbing and keeping the audience’s attention for a lasting
impact. Awareness also means creating a sense of urgency so that targets assess the health issue
as serious, understand how it affects them personally, and feel motivated enough to take action.
Successful messages don’t just stop at creating awareness. Facilitating long-term behavioral
change requires some instruction on how to enact the new, healthier behavior. Messages need to
point to the means with which targets can adopt the message and perform the desired behaviors,
such as specifying to heart disease patients what specific foods are low in cholesterol and where
to purchase healthier foods. Finally, when using persuasive tactics, the source of the message
needs to have credibility with the audience. Such a credible source can be a well-known expert
or a likable celebrity who appears to be connected to the health issue. Another persuasive tactic
102
Persuasion and Public Opinion
is using the right kind and amount of emotional appeal. As stated earlier, fear appeals can be
compelling, but they should be used with caution—and emotional appeals should not stand on
their own; they provide support only for the content of the message, which needs to have a strong
logical appeal, as well.
Social Issue Campaign Appeals
Common persuasion appeals used in social advocacy campaigns include:
1. Emotional Appeals: Appeals to emotions such as empathy, compassion, fear, guilt, or
anger can be highly effective in motivating people to take action or support a cause. For
example, campaigns addressing child hunger may use emotional appeals to evoke
sympathy and drive donations.
2. Rational Appeals: Logical and fact-based appeals provide evidence, data, and reasoned
arguments to persuade individuals to support a cause. This is often used in advocacy
campaigns related to public policy or scientific issues.
3. Moral Appeals: Appeals to ethical values and moral principles can influence people's
behavior and beliefs. Campaigns advocating for human rights, environmental
conservation, or social justice often use moral appeals to underscore the importance of
their causes.
4. Social Norms/Bandwagon Appeal: Persuading individuals by showing that a particular
behavior is widely accepted by society or their peers. Social norms appeals aim to make
people conform to what is considered the norm within their social groups. As social
beings, humans are naturally inclined to follow social norms. Contrary to the direct and
often fear-inducing messages used in anti-smoking campaigns, the social norms approach
takes an indirect route. Instead of instructing individuals with statements like "You
should do this," it operates on the psychological principle that people prefer to align their
behavior with what others are doing, finding comfort in social conformity. When
communicators convey the prevailing social norms surrounding an issue, they subtly
prompt individuals to adjust their attitudes to better align with the collective sentiments
of the larger group. This approach taps into the human inclination towards conformity
and the desire to fit in with their social peers. For example:
A neighborhood has been struggling to promote recycling among its residents. The local
community association decides to run a social advocacy campaign.
Traditional Approach (Direct Messaging): Message 1: "You should recycle your waste to
protect the environment!"
Social Norms Approach (Indirect Messaging): Message 2: "Join your neighbors in our
recycling efforts. Our community cares about preserving our environment together."
103
Persuasion and Public Opinion
In this scenario, Message 2, using the social norms approach, doesn't tell individuals what
they "should" do directly. Instead, it emphasizes the collective action of the community,
subtly encouraging others to participate in recycling to align with the norm established by
their neighbors. This approach leverages the human tendency to conform to group
behavior.
Campaign: "The Dove Campaign for Real Beauty"
Background: Launched by Dove, a leading personal care brand, the "Dove Campaign for
Real Beauty" started in 2004 with the aim of challenging traditional beauty standards and
promoting a more inclusive definition of beauty. The campaign sought to boost self-esteem
and body confidence among women and girls by celebrating their natural beauty in all its
diversity.
Appeals Used:
1. Emotional Appeal (Empowerment and Self-Confidence): The campaign's
advertisements featured real women of various shapes, sizes, ages, and ethnic
backgrounds, rather than professional models. These authentic portrayals aimed to
resonate with viewers emotionally, inspiring them to feel more confident and
empowered in their own bodies.
2. Social Norms Appeal: By showcasing women who did not fit conventional beauty
ideals but were portrayed as beautiful and confident, the campaign challenged and
reshaped societal norms surrounding beauty. It encouraged viewers to question and
redefine these norms.
3. Storytelling Appeal: The campaign included interviews and personal stories of the
women featured in their ads. These narratives provided context and depth, allowing
viewers to connect with the individuals and their journeys to self-acceptance.
4. Authority Appeal: Dove, as a trusted brand, used its authority to promote a message
of embracing real beauty. Their commitment to this cause was reinforced through
partnerships with experts and organizations working on self-esteem and body
confidence issues.
104
Persuasion and Public Opinion
Campaign: "Ehna el Saada" (We Are Happiness) Mental Health Campaign
Background: "Ehna el Saada" is a prominent Egyptian social advocacy campaign that was
launched by the Egyptian government in 2019. The campaign aimed to promote happiness,
well-being, and positivity among the Egyptian population, focusing on improving mental
health and overall life satisfaction.
Appeals Used:
1. Emotional Appeal (Happiness and Well-Being): The campaign relied heavily on
emotional appeal by emphasizing the importance of happiness and well-being in
people's lives. It conveyed messages about the positive impact of happiness on mental
health and overall quality of life.
2. Social Norms Appeal: "Ehna el Saada" sought to influence social norms by
encouraging individuals and communities to prioritize happiness. By promoting
happiness as a shared societal value, the campaign aimed to foster a cultural shift
toward greater emotional well-being.
3. Storytelling Appeal: The campaign featured personal stories and testimonials from
individuals who had overcome challenges and found happiness in their lives. These
stories served as inspirational examples and encouraged others to pursue their paths to
happiness.
4. Authority Appeal: The Egyptian government and relevant health authorities endorsed
and supported the campaign, lending it credibility and authority. Experts in psychology
and mental health were involved in crafting the campaign's messages and strategies.
Effectiveness: "Ehna el Saada" generated widespread awareness and discussion about the
importance of mental health and happiness in Egypt. It encouraged individuals to prioritize
their emotional well-being and seek support when needed. The emotional appeal, combined
with personal stories and authoritative endorsements, resonated with many Egyptians.
While measuring the long-term impact of such a campaign on national happiness and mental
health is challenging, "Ehna el Saada" initiated crucial conversations and emphasized the
significance of happiness as a societal goal. It highlighted the role of positive psychology in
improving individuals' lives and contributed to the broader discourse on well-being in Egypt.
105
Persuasion and Public Opinion
Chapter Seven: Persuasion in Context: Social
Media
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
After reading this chapter, you should be
able to:

Know major types of social media
campaigns.

Differentiate between traditional and
online persuasion techiques

Analyze social media campaigns of
different types.
From the way we curate our Instagram feeds to project an idealized image of our lives to
the viral spread of hashtag movements on Twitter, social media has become intertwined with our
identities and values. The dopamine rush of receiving likes on a Facebook post or the FOMO
(Fear of Missing Out) triggered by friends' Snapchat stories are testament to how social media
appeals to our deepest psychological drives. In the age of social media, screens have become
powerful platforms for influence. This chapter explores the fascinating realm of how social
media captivates and shapes our behaviors and beliefs. The addictive nature of platforms like
Facebook, Instagram, and TikTok is undeniable; we continuously scroll, like, and share.
Consider those countless hours spent watching YouTube videos or the endless stream of
notifications that compel us to check our phones incessantly. These are not mere quirks; they
represent the profound influence of social media. However, the impact of social media extends
beyond personal lives. From political campaigns harnessing the viral potential of memes to
corporations using influencers to promote products, the persuasive power of social media shapes
society and commerce. In this chapter, we'll delve into the strategies, techniques, and real-life
examples that illuminate how persuasion unfolds in the digital era.
In today's digital age, media and technology play a central role in shaping public opinion. We
will analyze the ways in which social media platforms, digital advertising, and online
communities have transformed the landscape of persuasion. This includes the use of algorithms,
data analytics, and personalized content to target and persuade individuals.
106
Persuasion and Public Opinion
Social Media Campaigns Defined
Social media campaigns are strategic, organized efforts conducted on social media platforms to
achieve specific goals. These campaigns leverage the reach, interactivity, and sharing capabilities
of platforms like Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and LinkedIn to connect with a target audience,
promote messages, and drive desired actions. They can serve various purposes, including
marketing products or services, raising awareness for social causes, influencing public opinion,
or engaging with customers.
A successful social media campaign typically involves meticulous planning, precise targeting,
compelling content creation, and active community management. It begins with setting clear
objectives, such as increasing brand awareness, boosting website traffic, or growing a social
media following. Campaigns often employ a mix of content types, including text, images, videos,
and user-generated content, to capture and retain audience attention.
Key performance indicators (KPIs) are tracked to measure the campaign's effectiveness, such as
engagement metrics (likes, comments, shares), click-through rates, conversion rates, and return
on investment (ROI). Social media campaigns are dynamic, responsive, and adaptable, evolving
with changing trends and audience preferences. They have become integral to modern marketing
and communication strategies, offering a direct, interactive channel to connect with a global
audience.
Examples of social media campaign include:
1. Product Launch Campaigns: Companies use social media to generate excitement and
anticipation for new products. For instance, when Apple launched the iPhone X, they
teased the features on their social media profiles, conducted a live event on platforms like
YouTube, and encouraged user-generated content through hashtags like #iPhoneX.
2. Awareness and Advocacy Campaigns: Nonprofit organizations and social causes
leverage social media to create awareness about critical issues. The "Ice Bucket
Challenge" by the ALS Association went viral, with people dumping buckets of ice water
on themselves to raise awareness and funds for ALS research.
3. Political Campaigns: Political candidates and parties use social media to connect with
voters, share policy proposals, and mobilize supporters. During the 2020 U.S.
Presidential election, both Joe Biden and Donald Trump used social media platforms to
reach their respective voter bases and engage in online debates. Political campaigns will
be covered in chapter 10.
4. Brand Engagement and Customer Service: Brands engage with their customers
through social media campaigns. Wendy's, known for its humorous and cheeky Twitter
responses, exemplifies how brands can interact with followers and build strong online
communities.
5. Influencer Marketing Campaigns: Brands partner with social media influencers who
have a substantial following in their niche. For example, fashion brands collaborate with
popular fashion influencers to showcase their products to a relevant and engaged
audience.
107
Persuasion and Public Opinion
6. User-Generated Content Campaigns: Companies encourage users to create content
related to their products or services. GoPro's #GoProTravel campaign invites users to
share their travel adventures using GoPro cameras, creating a library of captivating usergenerated content.
7. Cause-Related Campaigns: Brands align with social or environmental causes to
showcase their commitment to corporate social responsibility. Patagonia's "Worn Wear"
campaign promotes sustainability by encouraging customers to share stories of their wellloved Patagonia clothing.
8. Contests and Giveaways: Brands run contests and giveaways on social media to engage
their audience and boost brand visibility. For instance, Starbucks occasionally conducts
contests where customers can win prizes by sharing photos with their products and using
specific hashtags.
9. Trend-Jacking Campaigns: Brands tap into trending topics and hashtags to increase
their visibility. During major events like the Super Bowl or popular TV shows, brands
create real-time, relevant content to engage with users. Oreo's "Dunk in the Dark" tweet
during a Super Bowl blackout is a famous example.
10. Customer Feedback and Surveys: Brands use social media to gather customer feedback
and conduct surveys. This information helps them improve their products and services.
For instance, Airbnb engages with customers on social media to understand their travel
experiences and preferences.
These examples illustrate the versatility of social media campaigns. Each type serves a distinct
purpose, from building brand awareness to driving sales or advocating for social change.
Successful campaigns are characterized by strategic planning, creative content, and active
engagement with the target audience.
Difference between traditional and social media persuasion
Social media has significantly changed the landscape of persuasion. It has democratized the
ability to influence and be influenced, allowing individuals, organizations, and even grassroots
movements to reach vast audiences with their messages.
The emergence of new media has greatly enhanced the effectiveness and efficiency of persuasive
campaigns. Traditionally, advertising campaigns were seen as one-sided communication efforts.
However, Barack Obama's 2008 presidential campaign, as discussed earlier, demonstrates how
new media have transformed advertising into a more interactive process. Interestingly, public
relations has also experienced a similar transformation due to new media. New media platforms
enable several advantages: (1) a stronger emphasis on two-way communication, (2) a heightened
focus on relationship building, (3) the implementation of broader-reaching strategies, and (4)
reduced costs associated with creating persuasive messages that achieve their goals (Wahl).
In the realm of new media, the audience transitions from consumers to producers, granting them
the power to effect change in a culture's thoughts, beliefs, and actions. In this way, they can
persuade and be persuaded by others simultaneously (Wahl 113).
108
Persuasion and Public Opinion
In traditional media, individuals were passive consumers of information and advertisements
presented to them by television, radio, or print media. They had little to no influence over the
content.
With the advent of new media, especially social media platforms like Facebook, Twitter, and
YouTube, individuals became content producers. They now have the agency to create and share
their own content, whether it's a tweet, a Facebook post, a YouTube video, or a blog. This shift
in media culture empowers users to shape public opinion, advocate for causes, and persuade
others by expressing their thoughts, beliefs, and values.
For instance, consider the impact of social media influencers who share their experiences with
products or promote social and environmental causes. Their user-generated content can influence
the opinions and behaviors of their followers, illustrating how new media allows individuals to
actively engage in persuasion both as persuaders and as those being persuaded.
In the realm of new media, individuals are encouraged to seek additional sources, provide
feedback, and engage in dialogues with others regarding the content they have encountered. For
instance, a simple YouTube search yields a video clip from a comedy show parodying a
presidential debate. However, instead of passively viewing the video and moving on, the
audience is invited to post comments, share video responses, and participate in discussions or
debates concerning the video's authenticity. These discussions often result in a spectrum of
opinions. Some comments may critique the video, while others may commend it and offer
evidence supporting its accuracy. In this way, the audience gains the ability to influence and
persuade fellow audience members, transcending the traditional role of being merely a target of
persuasion (Borchers).
Here's how social media has transformed persuasion:
1. Accessibility: Social media provides a low-cost, easily accessible platform for anyone to
share their ideas and persuade others. This has led to a proliferation of voices and
perspectives, enabling niche causes to gain attention.
2. Speed and Virality: Information on social media spreads at an unprecedented pace. Viral
campaigns can influence millions within hours, amplifying the impact of persuasive
messages.
3. Interactivity: Unlike traditional media, social media allows for two-way communication.
Persuaders can engage directly with their audience, addressing questions and concerns in
real time, which builds trust and credibility.
4. Micro-Targeting: Social media platforms collect vast amounts of data on user
preferences and behaviors. This data allows for highly targeted persuasive campaigns,
reaching the most receptive audiences.
5. Peer Influence: Social media leverages social proof, where people are more likely to be
persuaded when they see others they trust endorsing an idea or product. This can lead to
bandwagon effects.
6. Filter Bubbles: Social media algorithms often show users content that aligns with their
existing beliefs. This can reinforce preexisting attitudes and limit exposure to opposing
viewpoints, making persuasion more challenging.
109
Persuasion and Public Opinion
7. Influencer Marketing: Influencers have emerged as persuasive figures who can shape
public opinion and drive consumer behavior through sponsored content and
endorsements.
8. Crisis Management: During crises, social media can be a double-edged sword for
organizations. It allows them to respond quickly and directly to issues but also exposes
them to rapid public scrutiny.
The study of persuasion is significantly impacted by four key features of the Internet. Unlike
other forms of media, the Internet eliminates the constraints of time and space, enabling instant
communication with individuals located in distant regions. Through videoconferencing tools,
visual interactions with remote counterparts are also possible. Furthermore, the Internet grants
access to international newspapers, providing insights into diverse cultural viewpoints.
Consequently, society becomes more decentralized, necessitating persuaders to adjust their
conventional approaches for reaching audiences.
The second crucial aspect is the Internet's utilization of hypertext, enabling users to navigate
between sections of text. This empowers audiences to control how they absorb information.
Instead of reading an entire article, Internet users can leverage hyperlinks to jump to specific
sections, selecting the information they desire by clicking on provided links. Content providers
must design their web pages for swift information retrieval. Persuaders, in turn, must devise
strategies to maintain viewers' engagement.
Additionally, persuaders harness social media platforms like Facebook and Twitter for various
persuasive techniques. Initially, they establish a presence that users can "like" or "follow,"
allowing them to disseminate targeted messages consistently. Consequently, users encounter
these messages in their News Feeds when they check their social media. Moreover, when users
engage by "liking," sharing, or retweeting content, they essentially endorse the individual or
organization, effectively becoming advocates or advertisers for the persuader (Borchers).
When individuals engage with persuaders through social media, they inadvertently reveal their
preferences, which advertisers can leverage to tailor their advertising. This tailored approach
allows them to specifically target users with content that aligns with their interests. For instance,
if you have a Facebook account, you can explore this further in the Internet Activity: Facebook
Advertising. Reflect on the information you've shared on this platform and how it might make
you a suitable recipient for certain messages. It's worth noting that advertisers also rely on basic
demographic and geodemographic data to inform their targeting strategies. In essence, social
media offer a cost-effective means of delivering highly focused advertisements.
The technology of the Internet facilitates a high degree of interactivity, distinguishing it from
traditional media like newspapers and magazines. While these traditional outlets have permitted
readers to submit letters to the editor, the Internet significantly amplifies the potential for
persuasive message sources to engage with their audience. In this digital era, individuals can
email talk show hosts, participate in instant surveys, and stay updated with breaking news
alongside a global audience. A notable study demonstrated that online news articles featuring
110
Persuasion and Public Opinion
user comments or ratings could influence how readers perceived the article. In some instances,
the presence of comments or ratings led viewers to perceive the article as more divergent from
public opinion compared to articles without such interactive elements (Borchers).
The Internet has significantly advanced the capacity of persuaders to specifically target particular
audiences. Marketers can precisely identify potential customers by monitoring their online
activities. For instance, if someone browses websites related to video games, they may later
encounter an advertisement for a specific video game while checking their email. Clicking on
this ad directs them to a website where they can purchase the desired game. Similarly, a user
who searches for "automobiles" on Yahoo! will notice that the top results are advertisements
from car companies like Ford or BMW. Internet marketing excels at reaching users who are
actively considering the purchase of a particular product or service. Remarkably, technology now
exists to trace a user's every online interaction.
The social media landscape offers a wealth of content that provides an excellent avenue for
brands to engage in conversations with their audience and actively listen to their feedback. While
paying for visibility on social media is a reality, such as through ad purchases or post
promotions, the true benefit lies in encouraging the audience to actively engage with the brand’s
content and, more importantly, share it within their own social networks. Essentially, this
involves nurturing individuals to become brand ambassadors. The key is to construct a message
that captivates and motivates people, fostering their interest and prompting them to share the
brand’s message (Perloff).
Imagine a fitness brand promoting a new workout routine. Instead of simply posting an ad
saying, "Try our new workout plan," they create engaging content. They produce a series of short
videos demonstrating the workout, explaining its benefits, and showcasing real people who have
seen positive results. They then share these videos on their social media platforms.
What makes this effective is that it's not just a one-way message; it invites the audience to
participate. People watch the videos, try the workouts, and post their own videos or comments
about their experiences. Some users even share their progress photos.
This engagement turns ordinary customers into brand ambassadors. They're not just consumers;
they're part of a community that shares a common interest in fitness. They willingly share the
brand's content and recommend it to their friends, greatly extending the campaign's reach.
Social media have significant implications for persuaders. Firstly, users wield the power to
control public discussions surrounding issues, events, or organizations. When an idea or video
goes viral, it rapidly garners substantial exposure from regular social media users and often
attracts attention from mainstream media. While these occurrences can sometimes be amusing,
they can also hold substantial sway and impact persuasive sources. Consequently, organizations
aim to stimulate conversations among their audiences, moving away from traditional advertising.
When a persuasive source manages to ignite discussions among its audience members, it can
curtail its reliance on paid advertising. Additionally, social media serve as a great equalizer,
empowering ordinary individuals to become influential persuasive sources.
111
Persuasion and Public Opinion
Consider a small, family-owned restaurant that has been struggling to attract customers to its
establishment. In the past, they relied primarily on traditional advertising methods like flyers and
local newspaper ads. However, they decide to leverage the power of social media.
They create engaging content, including high-quality images of their delicious dishes and
behind-the-scenes glimpses of their chefs at work. This content resonates with their local
community and starts to gain traction. A satisfied customer shares a post about their recent
dining experience, praising the restaurant's food and friendly staff.
Soon, this customer's post goes viral, with many others in the area sharing their positive
experiences at the restaurant. The local community begins discussing the restaurant on social
media, generating buzz and excitement. As a result, the restaurant experiences a significant
increase in foot traffic and reservations. They find that their customers have become brand
ambassadors, enthusiastically sharing their experiences and attracting new patrons. This organic,
word-of-mouth promotion through social media reduces the need for costly traditional
advertising, making the restaurant more financially sustainable.
In this example, social media not only allowed the restaurant to control the public discussion
about their establishment but also empowered their customers to become influential persuasive
sources, ultimately boosting their business.
The promotion of products is rapidly shifting towards social media platforms, and skilled
marketers are quickly adapting their persuasive tactics to align with the unique characteristics of
modern interactive media. Recognizing the opportunity, advertisers are making use of the
fundamental aspects of platforms like Facebook and various other social networking sites. Their
aim is to monitor and attract consumers using a range of strategies.
Digital technology has brought about significant changes in the landscape of persuasion, altering
its dynamics in several noteworthy ways. It has introduced greater complexity, erasing the
boundaries that once separated information, entertainment, and influence. For instance, a website
designed for information or amusement can catch the attention of a blogger who transforms it
with images and shares the modified content online. This content then becomes a persuasive
message, imbued with meanings that the initial communicator did not intend. (Perloff)
When examining social networking websites collectively, their inherent persuasive nature
becomes evident. Take Twitter, for example, which seems to have evolved from Facebook's
status updates. Twitter's primary purpose is to answer the question, "What's happening?" through
tweets. Another significant feature is "Trending Topics," listing the most tweeted-about subjects.
Similarly, Facebook employs persuasive elements through profiles, status messages, photos,
applications, causes, and links. The persuasive influence is at play even when not explicitly
recognized. Features like status updates and applications subtly persuade users to prioritize
certain aspects of their lives over others, shaping their online presence.
112
Persuasion and Public Opinion
Goals of Persuasion
Persuasion is an integral aspect of all forms of human communication, just like social influence.
It's omnipresent; we encounter it daily. Estimates suggest that the average person is exposed to
anywhere from 300 to 5,000 messages each day.
In today's media-driven era, the nature of persuasion holds significance for both those who
persuade and those who are persuaded. As receivers of these persuasive messages, we must
recognize how persuaders adapt their tactics to navigate the challenges they encounter.
To sum up the strategies employed by effective persuaders in contemporary times, we can say
that they cultivate a close and lasting connection with their audience. This connection is used to
convey the value of their product, service, or idea through the compelling use of narratives and
visual imagery. Each may be thought of as a way in which persuaders identify with us. (Borchers
25) Persuaders in the current technological media age have five objectives: forming
relationships, repetition, “electronic eloquence,” commoditization, and storytelling.
1. Forming Relationships
One of the key objectives for persuaders is to establish meaningful connections with their
audience. They aim to convey that they understand our values and concerns, encouraging us to
relate to them and their message. These relationships are crafted through their choice of words
and the imagery they employ (Borchers).
For instance, Apple has excelled in this aspect by creating retail stores designed to encourage
collaboration and transparency between customers and sales staff. This approach fosters a sense
of camaraderie and trust, making customers feel more connected to the brand and its products.
Similarly, social media influencers build relationships with their followers by sharing personal
stories and experiences, fostering a sense of connection and relatability that enhances their
persuasive influence.
A real-life example in the realm of politics is the "Yes We Can" campaign by Barack Obama
during his 2008 presidential run. By using inclusive language and inspiring visuals, the campaign
aimed to connect with voters on a personal level, cultivating a sense of shared values and
aspirations. This connection played a significant role in his successful campaign, showcasing the
power of building relationships in persuasion.
2. Repetition
In the art of persuasion, repetition plays a crucial role in strengthening the connection between
persuaders and their audience. This tactic is employed with the belief that by encountering a
message or symbol repeatedly, individuals are more likely to identify with it (Borchers).
113
Persuasion and Public Opinion
Consider the Nike logo, known as the "swoosh." It's a symbol that many of us encounter
countless times throughout our daily lives: on caps, T-shirts, billboards, magazines, and, of
course, on Nike shoes. This consistent and widespread presence is a deliberate strategy by Nike.
By saturating our environment with their logo, they aim to capture our attention and make us
more receptive to their message.
In advocacy campaigns, repetition can be equally effective. For instance, campaigns for
environmental conservation often use recurring visuals or slogans to create familiarity and drive
home their message. This repetition can help in building a stronger connection between the cause
and the audience, increasing the likelihood of support and action. The "Keep America Beautiful"
campaign used the iconic "Crying Indian" ad. The image of the Native American shedding a tear
over the littered landscape became synonymous with the campaign and the broader
environmental movement. By repeatedly featuring this poignant image, the campaign aimed to
reinforce the message of environmental stewardship and foster a strong connection with the
audience. This strategy contributed to raising awareness and driving action for cleaner, more
beautiful communities.
During Donald Trump's 2016 presidential campaign, the slogan "Make America Great Again"
became a hallmark. Trump and his campaign team strategically repeated this slogan across
rallies, merchandise, and social media platforms. By flooding the campaign with this concise and
memorable phrase, they aimed to establish a strong and recognizable connection with their
audience.
The repetition of "Make America Great Again" was intended to evoke a sense of nostalgia for a
perceived better past, reinforcing the idea that Trump was the candidate who could restore it.
This strategy contributed to building a fervent and loyal base of supporters who strongly
identified with the slogan and its associated message.
3. Electronic Eloquence
Electronic Eloquence Model is a concept that pertains to how messages are crafted and delivered
in the digital age to effectively persuade and engage audiences. It recognizes that the form in
which information is presented through electronic channels, such as social media, websites, and
multimedia content, plays a critical role in influencing perceptions and attitudes. Effective
persuasion in the digital realm starts with a deep understanding of the target audience. Persuaders
must be attuned to the demographics, preferences, and expectations of their audience. This
understanding allows them to tailor their messages for maximum impact (Borchers).
The model emphasizes that the form in which information is presented is as important as the
content itself. This form encompasses factors like the choice of words, visual elements,
multimedia components, and the overall design of the message. Persuaders must carefully
consider how these elements align with the digital medium and audience expectations. Messages
should resonate with the culture and values of the audience. Persuaders need to communicate in
114
Persuasion and Public Opinion
ways that reflect the consciousness and worldview of their target group. This alignment enhances
the credibility and relatability of the message. Technology plays a central role in electronic
eloquence. Persuaders leverage digital tools and platforms to deliver messages effectively. This
includes utilizing social media platforms, data analytics, personalization algorithms, and
multimedia content creation tools.
Politicians often tailor their speeches to resonate with specific demographics. For instance, a
presidential candidate addressing young voters might use informal language and pop culture
references to connect with their audience. Simultaneously, they may utilize social media
platforms like Twitter or Instagram to reach younger, tech-savvy voters who expect concise and
visually appealing content. During the 2012 U.S. presidential campaign, President Barack
Obama's team recognized the power of form in reaching younger voters. They crafted a
memorable and influential campaign message: "Forward." This single word summarized the idea
of progress and a better future. It was strategically shared across various forms of media,
including social platforms like Twitter, where concise messaging is essential. The form of this
message aligned with the expectations of a digitally connected, socially conscious audience.
In the realm of digital advertising, the form of persuasion is evident. Advertisers meticulously
design online ads to align with the preferences of their target audience. For instance, an ecommerce platform may use personalized product recommendations based on a user's browsing
history, leveraging the expectation of tailored content. This form of electronic eloquence
enhances the persuasiveness of the ad. During the 2012 U.S. presidential campaign, President
Barack Obama's team recognized the power of form in reaching younger voters. They crafted a
memorable and influential campaign message: "Forward." This single word encapsulated the
idea of progress and a better future. It was strategically shared across various forms of media,
including social platforms like Twitter, where concise messaging is essential. The form of this
message aligned with the expectations of a digitally connected, socially conscious audience.
In essence, the form of expression is not just a vehicle for communication; it's a strategic choice
that influences how persuaders connect with their audience in a digitally driven world. It's not
just about what is said but also how it is presented, reflecting an understanding of the audience's
expectations and preferences in the digital age.
4. Commoditization
In the contemporary landscape of persuasion, one crucial objective for persuaders is to add
attractiveness to their products or ideas with value, effectively transforming them into
commodities that appeal to audiences. This process is commonly referred to as commoditization.
It's about making the audience identify with and find value in what is being offered. The real
power lies not just in disseminating information but in adding value to that information
(Borchers).
Commoditization involves taking something and making it valuable in the eyes of consumers.
It's not merely about what's being sold but how it's perceived. This concept is especially
prominent in advertising and branding, where value is often associated with a name or label.
115
Persuasion and Public Opinion
Consider luxury fashion brands like Louis Vuitton or Gucci. These companies have mastered the
art of creating value through branding. While the actual products might not differ significantly
from other clothing or accessories in terms of functionality, the brand name itself carries
immense value. People are willing to pay a premium for items bearing these prestigious labels
because they represent a certain status, exclusivity, and perceived value.
In the world of technology, companies like Apple have successfully commoditized their
products. iPhones and MacBooks, for instance, are not just gadgets; they are status symbols.
Consumers are willing to pay a premium for Apple products because they perceive them as being
more valuable, stylish, and user-friendly compared to generic alternatives. Apple's branding
strategy has effectively turned its products into coveted commodities.
In essence, persuaders today aim to create value around their offerings, whether it's through
branding, unique features, or other factors that make their products or ideas more appealing and
valuable to the audience. This process of commoditization plays a pivotal role in modern
marketing and persuasion strategies.
5. Telling Stories
In the contemporary media age, persuaders have embraced storytelling as a compelling objective
to connect with their audiences. Storytelling is a familiar and effective tool in communication,
leveraging narrative elements to engage and influence audiences on multiple levels. Storytelling
is a timeless and universal form of communication that transcends cultural and linguistic
boundaries. Its effectiveness in persuasion lies in its ability to captivate, empathize, and resonate
with the audience. Here are two examples:
Example 1: Nonprofit Campaigns Many nonprofit organizations employ storytelling to convey
their mission and impact. They share personal stories of individuals or communities they have
helped. By putting a face and a narrative to their cause, these organizations evoke empathy and
engagement from their donors and supporters. For instance, a nonprofit working on clean water
initiatives might share a story of a young girl from a remote village whose life was transformed
by access to clean drinking water.
116
Persuasion and Public Opinion
Case Study: Apple Inc. - Mastering Persuasion in the Technological Era
Apple Inc. stands out as one of the most accomplished influencers in recent history. Across
various measures, including quarterly financial performance, product sales volumes, and
customer satisfaction, Apple has demonstrated a remarkable ability to persuade consumers to
not only buy its products but also embrace its brand narrative.
Objective 1: Forming Relationships Apple Inc. has excelled in forming deep and lasting
relationships with its customers. One notable example is the launch of the iPhone in 2007.
Apple positioned the iPhone not just as a product but as a lifestyle. They created a sense of
belonging to a community of tech-savvy individuals who valued design, innovation, and userfriendliness. Through its sleek and user-centric design, Apple fostered a strong emotional
connection with its customers, making them loyal advocates of the brand.
Objective 2: Repetition Apple has mastered the art of repetition in its marketing campaigns.
The annual iPhone releases are a testament to this. Each new iteration is accompanied by a
consistent message of innovation, quality, and excellence. By repeating these themes over the
years, Apple has ingrained them in the minds of consumers. This repetition builds anticipation
and excitement around each new product release.
Objective 3: Electronic Eloquence Apple's electronic eloquence is evident in its marketing
and product design. The company's website, advertisements, and product interfaces are known
for their simplicity and elegance. For instance, the clean and intuitive design of the iOS
operating system aligns with user expectations for an effortless digital experience. Apple's
electronic eloquence extends to its product presentations, where Steve Jobs, in his iconic black
turtleneck, engaged audiences with compelling narratives about the innovation and
craftsmanship behind each product.
Objective 4: Commoditization Apple has successfully commoditized its products, turning
them into coveted status symbols. The brand's premium pricing strategy positions its devices,
such as the iPhone and MacBook, as aspirational commodities. Consumers perceive these
products as not just functional gadgets but also as statements of style and prestige. This
commoditization strategy has contributed to Apple's continued success and high-profit
margins.
Objective 5: Storytelling Apple is renowned for its storytelling prowess. Their "1984" Super
Bowl ad, which introduced the Macintosh, is one of the most iconic examples. It used a
narrative inspired by George Orwell's novel to position Apple as a revolutionary force against
conformity and stagnation in the tech industry. Apple's product launch events are also
masterful storytelling platforms, where they unveil new products through captivating
narratives. A prime example of this was the iconic presentation by the late Steve Jobs when he
introduced the original iPhone, captivating the audience with compelling visuals and a
captivating narrative. The "Shot on iPhone" campaign, featuring user-generated content, tells
the story of the iPhone's role in capturing life's moments.
117
Persuasion and Public Opinion
Mass Interpersonal Persuasion on Social Media
With its expanding user base, it's evident that social networking is reshaping the landscape of
persuasion. One of the mechanisms through which persuasion operates within social networking
is through the concept known as "mass interpersonal persuasion."
Many experts posit that the evolution of social networking has given rise to a new form of
persuasion called "mass interpersonal persuasion" (MIP). This concept signifies the capacity of
individuals to influence attitudes and behaviors on a large scale, effectively combining the
potency of interpersonal persuasion with the expansive reach of mass media. Some have even
dubbed it the most significant development in persuasion since the inception of radio in the
1890s. Fogg (2008) identifies six key components of MIP: persuasive experience, automated
structure, social distribution, rapid cycle, huge social graph, and measured impact. While these
elements existed separately before Facebook's arrival, the platform brought them together into
one cohesive system, enabling both regular individuals and corporate entities to more effectively
connect with and persuade vast audiences.
The persuasive experience involves intentionally crafting an experience to achieve persuasion,
aiming to alter attitudes, beliefs, behaviors, or values. Within the realm of Facebook, one subtle
yet impactful form of persuasion revolves around identity management – the portrayal of oneself
as socially appealing. Take a moment to consider the effort and thoughtfulness invested in
creating a Facebook profile, either by yourself or your friends. Several aspects of the profile
contribute to our perception of the individual. For instance, the choice of profile photo can
convey a wealth of information to others. Many Facebook users opt for a recent photo of
themselves to validate their authenticity, while others select images featuring friends to project a
fun and socially desirable image (Wahl 116).
Automated structure in the context of mass interpersonal persuasion relies on the role of digital
technology as the underlying framework for persuasive interactions. On Facebook, this is evident
in the automated functions driven by computer technology, such as the delivery of emails,
requests, and links designed to promote ideas or events (Fogg, 2008). For instance, consider a
student who organized a charity walk/run to support a young girl battling a life-threatening
illness. She established a Facebook event for this endeavor and shared the link on her personal
profile. Remarkably, without formally inviting a single Facebook friend, she managed to attract
nearly 200 participants to her event page. Much of Facebook's persuasive efficacy, along with
many other social networking platforms, lies in the streamlined automation it offers. The
simplicity of clicking a link to accept an invitation or invite friends to an event facilitates
engagement in the persuasive process, benefiting both the persuader and the audience (Wahl
116).
In social distribution, the persuasive experience extends its reach through social connections.
While persuading an individual to align with your views, adopt a product, or contribute to a
cause is significant, the ultimate goal is to influence a multitude of people to take similar actions.
Social networking platforms, such as Facebook, facilitate mass persuasion by making it effortless
and harnessing the power of peer influence in crafting a specific image.
118
Persuasion and Public Opinion
When the persuasive experience spreads swiftly among individuals, it enters the realm of rapid
cycle, denoting the short time intervals between actions among people. Moreover, the concept of
a vast social graph pertains to the capacity of a persuasive experience to reach millions of
individuals through a network. In essence, when billions of users encounter a diverse array of
individually generated content, persuasion becomes a pervasive force, with the potential to
disseminate rapidly and extensively (Wahl 116).
Persuasive Techniques in Social Media
In the realm of business, a valuable resource for unraveling the intricacies of persuasion is Dr.
Robert Cialdini's book, "Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion." Within its pages, Cialdini
outlines six core ethical principles of influence that invariably shape our responses in social
exchanges: reciprocation, commitment and consistency, social proof, liking, authority, and
scarcity.
Reciprocation.
The first principle is reciprocation, a fundamental human tendency to respond in kind to the
kindness we receive from others. In the business context, this principle can be harnessed
effectively. For instance, businesses frequently employ this strategy on their Facebook pages. By
offering discounts or free products to users who engage with their content, companies generate a
sense of indebtedness, encouraging users to reciprocate by recommending the page to friends and
becoming repeat customers. Additionally, when we experience exceptional service, we often
express our gratitude through status updates or tweets, inadvertently promoting the business.
(Wahl 125)
Commitment and Consistency.
Commitment and consistency, another principle of influence, revolves around the human
inclination to uphold reliability and constancy in their actions. In the realm of new media,
especially with the daily influx of group invitations, fan pages, and event requests, this principle
holds true. For instance, when a friend asks you to "like" their band's page, declining can be
challenging as it might be perceived as a lack of commitment to the friendship. Translating this
to the business sphere, once you've shown support by "liking" a company, you're more likely to
comply with their requests, such as trying a new product or referring a friend to their site.
119
Persuasion and Public Opinion
Social Proof
Cialdini's principle of social proof underscores the influential nature of observing others to gauge
the acceptability of a behavior. This is evident on platforms like Facebook, where people often
"like" businesses upon seeing trusted friends do the same. For instance, when Dana noticed her
friends had endorsed a new gym by "liking" its page, she followed suit and eventually attended
classes there. Without her friends' social proof, she might not have considered the gym.
Similarly, online customer reviews play a role in social proof, often outweighing price
considerations when they are overwhelmingly positive or negative. The impact of such reviews
is amplified when they offer substantial and high-quality information (Gass).
User-generated Content (UGC): Encouraging users to create and share their content
related to a brand or product. UGC acts as social proof and allows for authentic peer-topeer persuasion. When users see their peers using or endorsing a product, it can positively
influence their perception and encourage them to take similar actions.
Liking
Liking, another of Cialdini's persuasive principles, plays a significant role in business strategies.
It's rooted in our tendency to say yes to those we like or find similar to ourselves, influenced by
factors like physical appeal, shared interests, and familiarity.
For companies, embracing the liking principle often involves creating attractive websites or
products. Consider the Amazon Kindle's Facebook page, which regularly shares book
recommendations from well-known figures like celebrities and authors. When users click on
these posts, they are directed to articles presenting the book suggestions and offering purchase
links. These articles feature book cover images and brief text descriptions by the endorsing
celebrity, athlete, or author. This approach appeals to individuals who like the featured figures or
appreciate the straightforward presentation, making them more inclined to make a purchase.
As part of its Wrapped 2019 campaign where it highlighted listening trends from the
decade, Spotify put up a number of billboards that displayed various humorous listening trends
from its users. Some of these trends included the large number of streams “Total Eclipse of the
Heart” received during the week of 2017’s solar eclipse as well as how Rebecca Black’s
“Friday” receives a large jump in streams on Fridays compared to other days of the week. These
humorous trends were generally well received and shared across social media
Authority
A fifth principle of influence is that of authority. Authority is essentially the testimonial form of
persuasion, whereby a person is persuaded by a famous or well-respected person’s endorsement.
120
Persuasion and Public Opinion
People tend to trust and respect individuals who possess expertise, knowledge, or experience in a
specific subject matter. When someone is seen as an authority figure in a particular field, their
opinions and recommendations carry more weight. For example, a review is written by a tech
blogger who is well-known in the industry for his expertise in mobile technology. He has tested
and reviewed numerous smartphones over the years and has a history of providing accurate and
insightful reviews.
Influencer Marketing: Collaborating with influential individuals on social media who
have a large following and a strong influence within a specific niche or industry. Brands
partner with these influencers to promote their products or services, leveraging the
influencers' credibility and reach to persuade their audience to try or purchase the
offerings.
Scarcity
Scarcity, or limiting the availability of a product, offer, or membership, is a final tool of
influence. In terms of new media, scarcity often occurs in the form of a “limited offer” or
contest. The scarcity principle, as described by Cialdini, is the idea that people tend to place a
higher value on things that are perceived as scarce or in limited supply. When something is
believed to be rare or about to run out, it becomes more desirable. For example, a limited-time
discount offer on a product can create a sense of urgency, driving customers to make a purchase
before the offer expires.
Exclusivity: Utilizing the principles of scarcity and exclusivity to persuade users to take
immediate action. Brands may offer limited-time discounts, exclusive access to new products or
services, or create the perception of exclusivity by requiring invitations or memberships. This
creates a sense of urgency and incentivizes users to engage or purchase before missing out.
For example, a clothing store announces a "one-day-only" sale where a popular designer dress is
available at a significantly reduced price. Shoppers, perceiving the dress as scarce due to the
short timeframe of the sale, are more likely to rush to the store to purchase it, even if they hadn't
planned to buy it before. The limited availability creates a sense of urgency and increases the
dress's perceived value.
Fear of Missing Out (FOMO) is a persuasive strategy that leverages the fear and anxiety people
feel when they believe they are missing out on something valuable or exciting. Marketers and
advertisers often use FOMO to motivate people to take action, make purchases, or engage with
their content.
121
Persuasion and Public Opinion
Forms of Digital Influence
eWOM: Digital Buss.
Electronic word of mouth (eWOM) is all the rage. People actively comment on brands,
companies, political issues, and public figures via all manner of social media. WOM is most
effective when it is perceived as genuine rather than manufactured and peer driven rather than
commercially sponsored. It operates largely through interpersonal channels (cellphone, email,
texting), lending it an air of authenticity. It is inexpensive compared to traditional media.
Sponsored Content:
The rise of social media has spawned a surge in advertising masquerading as genuine peer-topeer influence. For example, sponsored content includes promoted tweets and Instagram posts,
which are essentially paid advertisements. Native advertising involves ads posing as news
stories. Native ads function as “clickbait,” luring in readers with snappy headlines or provocative
photos. Both approaches are effective because many users have difficulty distinguishing such
content from genuine material. (Wojdynski, 2016).
Opinion Mining and Sentiment Tracking:
The Web is an opinion-rich environment. People constantly share their attitudes, opinions, and
values via social media. And marketers are listening. Many companies, for example, now
specialize in opinion mining and sentiment tracking by monitoring social media to gauge the
public’s mood in nearly real time. Sophisticated algorithms can track how a person, brand, or
issue is trending based, not only on the number of tweets generated, but also on how favorable,
neutral, or negative those tweets are. (Gass 35)
Gamification
Gamification: Incorporating game-like elements, such as challenges, rewards, and competitions,
into social media interactions. Gamification techniques tap into users' desire for competition,
achievement, and rewards, motivating them to engage more deeply with the content or brand and
reinforcing desired behaviors.
Gamification, the application of video game elements to various contexts, is increasingly utilized
to boost consumer engagement. People are drawn to games due to their entertainment,
competition, and rewarding nature. For example, Nike+ employs shoe sensors that enable
runners to share their performance data, fostering social interaction and competition through
downloadable apps. Gamification elements like points, badges, and leaderboards incentivize
continued participation. This approach has found applications in education, workplace
productivity, voter engagement, and social cause awareness. (Gass 36)
122
Persuasion and Public Opinion
Example of a Brand Campaign Based on Gamification on Social Media: Starbucks
Rewards "Starland" Game
Brand: Starbucks
Campaign Name: Starbucks Rewards "Starland" Game
Objective: Starbucks launched the "Starland" game to increase customer participation in its
Starbucks Rewards program, drive more app downloads, and encourage repeat visits to their
coffee shops.
How It Works:
1. Starland Game Board: Starbucks Rewards members were given access to a virtual
game board within the Starbucks app, where they could participate in the "Starland"
game.
2. Earn Plays: Customers earned game plays by making qualifying purchases at
Starbucks using their registered Starbucks Rewards card or mobile app. Each purchase
granted them a certain number of plays.
3. Collect and Win: By collecting sets of game pieces or accumulating enough Starbucks
Rewards stars, participants had a chance to win various prizes, including free drinks,
food items, Bonus Stars (reward points), or even Starbucks for a year.
4. Social Sharing: Starbucks encouraged players to share their progress and winnings on
social media, using the hashtag #Starland.
Results:



The "Starland" game helped Starbucks achieve its objectives by increasing app
downloads, driving customer engagement, and boosting repeat business.
The social media buzz created by participants sharing their game progress further
extended the campaign's reach and impact.
Starbucks successfully used gamification on social media to enhance its loyalty
program and strengthen its connection with customers.
123
Persuasion and Public Opinion
Crowdsourcing and Crowdfunding:
Crowdsourcing involves outsourcing tasks, projects, or ideas to a diverse group or "crowd" of
people, typically via an open call on the internet. This crowd can contribute ideas, solutions,
content, or efforts to collectively achieve a goal. Crowdsourcing extends an open invitation to
online users to engage in tasks or problem-solving collectively. It operates under the belief that
expertise isn't confined to specialists but can be found throughout the online community. For
instance, Doritos initiated the "Crash the Super Bowl" competition, allowing consumers to create
their 30-second commercials. Starbucks' "White Cup Contest" sought customer input for a
unique coffee cup design through #WhiteCupContest. (Gass 36)
A related strategy, crowdfunding, involves raising money through online donations.
Crowdfunding is a method of raising funds or capital for a project, product, or venture by
collecting small contributions from a large number of individuals, often through online
platforms. Contributors, or "backers," provide financial support in exchange for rewards, equity,
or simply to support a cause. Websites allow people to ask for donations or start-up funds for a
cause or business venture. There are crowdfunding platforms where individuals and businesses
can pitch their creative projects, inventions, or charitable causes to a wide audience and receive
funding from interested backers.
The Pebble Smartwatch is an example of a successful crowdfunding campaign. In 2012, Pebble
Technology launched a Kickstarter campaign to fund the production of its innovative
smartwatch. They set a goal of $100,000 but ended up raising over $10 million from backers
who were interested in pre-ordering the smartwatch before it was manufactured. This campaign
helped fund the development and production of the Pebble Smartwatch, which became a popular
wearable tech product.
FOMO: Fear of Missing Out
Fear of Missing Out (FOMO) is a persuasive strategy that leverages the fear and anxiety people
feel when they believe they are missing out on something valuable or exciting. Marketers and
advertisers often use FOMO to motivate people to take action, make purchases, or engage with
their content. Here's how it works and some examples:
1. Creating a Sense of Urgency: FOMO strategies often include phrases like "limited time
offer," "act now," or "only a few left." These messages suggest that if you don't act quickly,
you'll miss out on a great opportunity.
Example: "Only 24 hours left to get 50% off your favorite products!"
2. Social Proof: Showing that others are already benefiting or participating can trigger FOMO.
People often want to be part of what everyone else is doing.
124
Persuasion and Public Opinion
Example: "Join the thousands of satisfied customers who have already upgraded to our premium
plan."
3. Exclusive Access: Offering exclusive or early access to a product, service, or event can make
people fear missing out on something special.
Example: "Be among the first 100 subscribers to access our new app features."
4. Highlighting Scarcity: Emphasizing limited quantities or availability can trigger FOMO
because people don't want to miss out on something rare.
Example: "Hurry, only a few seats left for this once-in-a-lifetime event!"
For example, In 2017, Spotify launched Wrapped campaign, intending to create FOMO (fear of
missing out). This helped Spotify introduce a cascading 5. Live Updates and Events: Live
content, such as live streaming, webinars, or live sales events, can create a sense of immediacy,
making people feel they must participate to avoid missing out on the action.
Example: "Join us live at 7 PM for exclusive product demos and giveaways!"
Overall, FOMO leverages the fear that if you don't act or participate immediately, you'll miss out
on something valuable or exciting. It can be a powerful persuasive strategy in marketing and
social media campaigns.
In 2017, Spotify initiated a campaign called "Wrapped" with the goal of creating FOMO, or the
fear of missing out. This campaign not only encouraged existing users to engage more with the
app but also enticed new users to download and use it. Every year, Spotify users eagerly
anticipate their personalized Spotify Wrapped stories, which, in turn, makes non-Spotify users
feel excluded. For instance, in 2020, Spotify Wrapped led to a remarkable 21% increase in
mobile app downloads during the first week of December. Spotify introduced new features,
including in-app quizzes, personalized playlists, and social sharing options, making it one of the
most effective marketing campaigns for user acquisition.
Moreover, when Spotify's Artist Wrapped feature is launched, many musicians and podcasters
express their gratitude to their Spotify listeners on various social media platforms. This action
significantly amplifies the brand's reach to hundreds of millions of users organically.
Additionally, these posts often include mentions of Spotify along with screenshots, further
enhancing the brand's visibility. As a result, the hashtag #spotifywrapped becomes a trending
topic across all social platforms, and countless memes related to Spotify Wrapped flood social
media during the initial week of December 2020.
Engagement and Participation
This is a persuasive strategy used on social media platforms to involve the audience in a brand's
content or initiatives actively. This strategy aims to create a sense of involvement, interaction,
and participation, fostering a deeper connection between the audience and the brand. This
125
Persuasion and Public Opinion
strategy encourages users to create and share content related to the brand, products, or
campaigns. This could involve contests, challenges, or simply inviting users to share their
experiences. At times, companies ask questions or conduct polls to gather feedback and opinions
from the audience. This not only engages users but also provides valuable insights. The goal of
the Engagement and Participation strategy is to build a community of active and engaged
followers who not only consume content but also contribute to and advocate for the brand,
ultimately fostering brand loyalty and word-of-mouth marketing.
For example, The Pepsi Refresh Project: A Thirst for Change
PepsiCo's innovative cause-marketing program in which consumers submitted ideas for grants
for health, environmental, social, educational, and cultural causes. Consumers voted for their
favorite ideas, and PepsiCo funded the winners in grants ranging from $5,000 to $250,000.
PepsiCo encouraged consumer engagement and participation by allowing them to submit ideas
for grants and vote for their favorite ideas. This strategy leveraged the principle of involving
customers in the decision-making process and empowering them to make a difference in their
communities. It taps into the idea that when consumers are actively involved in a brand's
initiatives, they are more likely to develop a sense of ownership and loyalty towards the brand.
Influence Marketing
Influencer marketing is a collaborative partnership between a brand or business and an
influencer, wherein the influencer promotes the brand's products or services to their followers on
social media platforms. Influencers are typically individuals who have built a strong and loyal
online following due to their expertise, personality, or niche content.
Influencers are seen as authentic and trustworthy figures by their followers, making their
endorsements more persuasive. Influencers create engaging and tailored content that aligns with
a brand's message and resonates with their audience. Partnering with influencers in different
niches allows a brand to reach a diverse set of potential customers. A recent meta-analysis found
that celebrity endorsements improved consumers’ attitudes toward endorsed products, but not
necessarily intentions their to purchase those products. Another study found that endorser
credibility has a significant effect on brand equity, which refers to the value attached to a
particular brand. According to one study endorsers boost sales by about 20 percent on average.
(Gass 153)
126
Persuasion and Public Opinion
Beauty Brand Collaboration with a Makeup Influencer
Brand: XYZ Cosmetics
Influencer: BeautyByGlam
Campaign Objective: XYZ Cosmetics wants to promote its new line of skincare products and
increase brand awareness among a younger demographic.
Execution:
1. Influencer Selection: XYZ Cosmetics identifies BeautyByGlam, a popular beauty
influencer on Instagram and YouTube, known for her expertise in skincare routines
and makeup tutorials. She has a strong following of makeup enthusiasts, primarily in
the 18-35 age group.
2. Partnership Agreement: XYZ Cosmetics reaches out to BeautyByGlam to propose a
partnership. They negotiate terms, including compensation, content requirements, and
posting schedule. BeautyByGlam agrees to create a series of posts and videos about
XYZ's skincare products in exchange for payment and free products.
3. Content Creation: BeautyByGlam receives XYZ Cosmetics' skincare products and
starts creating engaging and informative content. She records video tutorials
demonstrating how to use the products in a skincare routine, highlighting their benefits
and results. She also takes high-quality photos of the products for Instagram.
4. Promotion: Over the course of a month, BeautyByGlam shares the content on her
social media platforms, including Instagram, YouTube, and Instagram Stories. She
includes captions and hashtags that mention XYZ Cosmetics and the specific product
line
5. Engagement: BeautyByGlam actively engages with her followers, responding to
comments and questions about the products. She encourages her audience to try XYZ
Cosmetics and share their experiences.
6. Measuring Success: XYZ Cosmetics tracks key performance indicators (KPIs) during
the campaign, including website traffic, sales conversions, and the growth of their
social media following. They also monitor mentions and user-generated content related
to their products.
Results:


XYZ Cosmetics experiences a significant increase in website traffic and sales during
the campaign, with a noticeable spike in the sales of the promoted skincare products.
BeautyByGlam's content generates thousands of likes, shares, and comments,
spreading the word about XYZ Cosmetics to her engaged audience.
127
Persuasion and Public Opinion
Personalization and Targeting
Leveraging the vast amount of user data available on social media platforms to deliver
personalized and targeted messages. By tailoring content and advertisements based on users'
preferences, demographics, and behaviors, brands can increase relevance and resonance, making
their messages more persuasive and engaging.
Personalization is the process of customizing content, products, services, or experiences to meet
the unique preferences and needs of individual users or customers. It aims to create a more
tailored and relevant interaction. Personalization can apply to various aspects, such as website
content, email marketing, product recommendations, and user interfaces. For instance, a
personalized website might display different products or content to different users based on their
interests. Examples of personalization include:



An e-commerce platform that recommends products based on a user's browsing and
purchase history.
Personalized email marketing campaigns that address recipients by their first name and
suggest products related to their previous purchases.
Streaming services like Netflix that use algorithms to recommend movies and TV shows
based on a user's viewing history.
Targeting is the practice of identifying and selecting specific segments or groups within a larger
audience to deliver your marketing message or content. It involves defining your ideal audience
and directing your efforts toward reaching them. Once a company has identified the target
segments, they create messaging and content that resonate specifically with each group. This
ensures that their message is relevant and engaging to the intended audience. Examples of
targeting include:



A sports brand targeting ads for running shoes to users who have recently shown an
interest in running and fitness.
A local restaurant running Facebook ads for lunch specials, specifically targeting users
within a 10-mile radius of the restaurant's location.
A political campaign tailoring its message to different demographic groups, such as
seniors, young professionals, and parents, based on their key concerns.
Narrative and Storytelling
Narrative and storytelling are powerful persuasive strategies that have been used for centuries to
convey ideas, influence opinions, and inspire action. These techniques tap into the human
instinct for storytelling, making them highly effective tools for communication and persuasion.
Relatable and well-developed characters make a story engaging. Audiences connect with
characters on an emotional level. Storytelling is persuasive for a number of reasons. Stories
capture and maintain the audience's attention. They are more engaging than dry facts or statistics.
Narratives prompt emotions, and emotions drive decision-making. People are more likely to be
128
Persuasion and Public Opinion
persuaded when they feel emotionally connected to a story. In addition, stories are easier to
remember than facts and figures. A well-told story can stay with the audience for a long time.
Brands use storytelling to create emotional connections with customers and persuade them to
purchase products or services. Nonprofits and advocacy groups use storytelling to raise
awareness, gain support, and drive social change.
Dove, the personal care brand, is widely recognized for its successful use of narrative and
storytelling as a persuasive strategy in its "Real Beauty" campaign. This campaign, which began
in the early 2000s, aimed to challenge conventional beauty standards and promote a more
inclusive and realistic portrayal of women's beauty. The campaign followed a narrative of selfdiscovery and self-acceptance. Real women were invited to participate in the campaign and were
asked to describe themselves to a forensic sketch artist who couldn't see them. Then, strangers
who had met these women briefly also described them. The resulting sketches based on selfdescriptions were often less flattering than those based on strangers' descriptions.
The campaign aimed to resolve this conflict by revealing that women were often too critical of
their own appearances. It encouraged women to embrace their natural beauty and recognize their
self-worth. The campaign's storytelling approach engaged viewers emotionally and
intellectually. The stark contrast between self-perception and how others saw these women
piqued curiosity. Viewers empathized with the women in the campaign, as many could relate to
issues of self-esteem and self-perception. It evoked emotions, making the message more
impactful.
Trend-Jacking
Trendjacking, short for "trend hijacking," is a marketing and communication strategy where
brands or individuals capitalize on popular trends, topics, or events to promote their own
messages, products, or services. It involves joining or "hijacking" ongoing conversations or
trends in an attempt to gain visibility, relevance, and engagement. The goal is to leverage the
existing interest and attention surrounding a trend to benefit one's own agenda or brand.
Key characteristics of trendjacking include:
1. Timeliness: Trendjacking requires quick action because trends are often short-lived.
Marketers must identify trends early and respond promptly.
2. Relevance: The content or message being promoted through trendjacking should align
with the ongoing trend or event. It must make sense in the context of the trend to be
effective.
3. Engagement: Successful trendjacking involves active engagement with the audience
discussing the trend. This can be in the form of social media posts, blog articles, videos,
or other content that encourages interaction and sharing.
4. Creativity: Trendjackers often put a creative or unique spin on their content to stand out
amidst the noise of trending topics.
129
Persuasion and Public Opinion
5. Risk: Trendjacking carries some risk, as misaligned or insensitive attempts can backfire
and damage a brand's reputation.
Examples of trendjacking might include a company using a popular internet meme to promote
their product, a social media post related to a major sporting event, or a blog article commenting
on a trending news story. Overall, trendjacking is a strategy used to ride the wave of existing
public interest and draw attention to a brand or message by connecting it to what's currently
popular or trending in culture, news, or social media. When done well, it can be an effective way
to increase brand visibility and engagement. However, it requires careful consideration to ensure
that the content remains relevant and respectful of the original trend or event.
In response to the huge increase in price
of eggs.
130
Persuasion and Public Opinion
Case Study: Oreo's "Dunk in the Dark" tweet
Oreo's "Dunk in the Dark" tweet is one of the
most iconic and memorable examples of realtime marketing through social media. It
occurred during Super Bowl XLVII in 2013
when a power outage disrupted the game,
causing the stadium to go dark for several
minutes.
In that unexpected moment, Oreo, the popular
cookie brand, seized the opportunity to create
an instant and witty social media campaign.
Just minutes after the power outage, Oreo
tweeted an image of a single, well-lit Oreo
cookie against a dark background with the
caption: "Power out? No problem. You can
still dunk in the dark."
This tweet became an instant sensation and
received widespread attention and
engagement across social media platforms. It
was retweeted, shared, and liked thousands of
times within a short period, making it go viral. The cleverness and timeliness of the tweet
captured the essence of real-time marketing, demonstrating Oreo's ability to respond quickly
and creatively to a trending event.
Oreo's "Dunk in the Dark" tweet is often cited as a prime example of agile marketing,
showcasing how a brand can capitalize on unexpected events to connect with its audience in a
playful and relevant way. It also highlighted the power of social media as a platform for realtime communication and engagement with consumers. This campaign set a benchmark for
brands looking to be agile and responsive in their marketing efforts, especially during major
cultural or sporting events.
The "Dunk in the Dark" tweet by Oreo effectively employed several persuasive techniques,
contributing to its widespread success:
1. Timeliness: Oreo's tweet was incredibly timely. It was sent out immediately after the
power outage during the Super Bowl, capitalizing on a real-time event when social
media engagement was at its peak. Timely messages often have a greater impact as
they resonate with current situations or conversations.
2. Humor: The tweet used humor, a powerful persuasive tool. By making a lighthearted
comment about dunking their cookies in the dark, Oreo created a positive and
131
Persuasion and Public Opinion
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
entertaining association with their brand. Humorous content is more likely to be shared
and remembered.
Relevance: Oreo made their product directly relevant to the situation at hand. By
suggesting that people could enjoy their cookies even during a power outage, they
made their brand useful and relatable in that moment.
Simplicity: The tweet's simplicity made it easy to understand and share. A single
image of an Oreo cookie with a concise message was more likely to catch people's
attention and be shared across social media platforms.
Engagement: Oreo encouraged engagement with their brand by inviting people to
continue enjoying their product even in challenging circumstances. This engagement
could foster positive brand associations and loyalty.
Memorability: The clever and unexpected nature of the tweet made it memorable.
People were more likely to remember and talk about Oreo's brand due to this
memorable moment.
Visual Appeal: The image of a well-lit Oreo against a dark background was visually
appealing and attention-grabbing. Visual content often performs better on social media.
132
Persuasion and Public Opinion
Chapter Nine: Persuasion in Context: News
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
After reading this chapter, you should be
able to:



Identify common persuasive techniques
used in news articles, headlines, and
reporting.
Distinguish between objective reporting
and persuasive reporting.
Analyze the impact of framing on
audience perception
The relationship between persuasion and news is a dynamic and essential aspect of modern
journalism. News outlets, in their pursuit of informing the public, often employ persuasive
techniques to engage, influence, and shape public opinion. Whether through carefully crafted
headlines, storytelling methods, or visual media, news organizations seek to not only convey
information but also to persuade audiences to pay attention, believe, and act on the news they
present. This intricate interplay between persuasion and news is both a journalistic challenge and
an opportunity, raising questions about journalistic ethics, credibility, and the responsible use of
persuasive strategies in the dissemination of information in an ever-evolving media landscape.
The Purpose of Persuasion in News
The purpose of persuasion in news can be multifaceted and depends on various factors,
including the nature of the news story, the target audience, and the goals of the news
organization. Here are some common purposes of persuasion in news:
Engagement: Persuasion is often used to capture and maintain the audience's attention. News
outlets employ persuasive headlines, visuals, and storytelling techniques to make news stories
more engaging and compelling.
Emotional Connection: Persuasion can help news stories evoke emotions in the audience.
Emotional engagement can make news stories more relatable and memorable, leading to a
stronger impact. Framing can evoke emotional responses by using language, imagery, or
anecdotes that resonate with the audience's feelings and values. Emotional appeals can be highly
persuasive, as they tap into the audience's emotions, making the message more relatable and
compelling.
133
Persuasion and Public Opinion
Influence and Opinion Shaping (framing): News organizations may use persuasion to
influence public opinion on important issues. They can present facts and arguments in a way that
encourages readers or viewers to see a particular perspective or take a specific stance. Framing
defines the narrative or storyline surrounding an issue. By choosing which aspects of an issue to
highlight and which to downplay, framers guide the audience's understanding of the topic. This
narrative sets the stage for further persuasion. Frames highlight specific points or arguments that
align with the framer's objectives. These points are presented in a way that makes them more
salient and memorable to the audience. This emphasis can lead people to prioritize certain
information over others.
Commercial Goals: Some news outlets may use persuasion to support their commercial
interests, such as increasing readership, viewership, or advertising revenue. This can involve
sensationalism or clickbait to attract more attention.
Behavior Change: In cases of public interest, such as health crises or civic responsibilities
like voting, news outlets may use persuasion to encourage specific behaviors, such as adopting
healthier habits or participating in civic activities. Ultimately, framing can influence decisionmaking processes. People are more likely to support policies, candidates, or causes that align
with frames that resonate with their values and emotions. Frames can thus sway public opinion
and shape the outcomes of political, social, and policy debates.
Advocacy and Social Change: News stories can be persuasive tools for advocating social
change and justice. They can shine a spotlight on societal issues, inspire activism, and mobilize
communities to address problems.
Persuasive Techniques in News: Framing
Framing theory is a communication theory that explores how the presentation of information, or
"frames," influences the way people perceive and interpret news, events, and issues. This theory
posits that the media, in its reporting and storytelling, selects certain aspects of a subject or issue
to emphasize while downplaying or omitting others. These chosen frames can shape the
audience's understanding, opinions, and emotional responses to the information presented.
Framing is not just about presenting information neutrally; it is often used as a persuasive tool.
By emphasizing certain aspects and downplaying others, media outlets and communicators can
influence public opinion, attitudes, and behaviors. A frame essentially represents the way an
idea is expressed or presented. It serves as a lens through which people view and understand
information. In simpler terms, think of a frame as a spotlight or a particular angle used to focus
on something important in a picture.
Communication researcher Robert Entman (1993) provides an insightful explanation of framing.
To frame, as he puts it, is to carefully choose and highlight certain aspects of the information
134
Persuasion and Public Opinion
being conveyed. This is done in a way that brings attention to a specific definition of a problem,
provides a particular explanation of its causes, passes moral judgment on the issue, and suggests
a recommended course of action. In other words, framing shapes how people perceive and think
about a topic. It's like painting a picture with words and ideas, emphasizing what's crucial while
influencing opinions and decisions.
Research findings have shown that changing how a message is presented can have a significant
impact on people's opinions. Recognizing the importance of strong opinions, studies on framing
suggest that those who want to persuade others should not express messages based on their own
moral beliefs. Instead, they should consider the viewpoints of the people they are trying to
persuade. By aligning with the principle of cognitive consistency, persuaders are more likely to
influence opinions when they highlight how the message supports the values that the recipients
already deeply treasure.
Let's consider a real-world example from news coverage that demonstrates the power of framing:
Scenario: Imagine a news story about a recent protest organized by a group advocating for
stricter gun control measures in the U.S.
Framing 1 - Public Safety Frame: In one news report, the event is framed with a focus on
public safety and the need for stricter gun control. The headlines and key points include:



"Protesters Rally for Stricter Gun Control to Enhance Public Safety"
"Advocates Urge Lawmakers to Take Action to Prevent Gun Violence"
Interviews with protesters emphasize concerns about reducing the risk of mass shootings
and protecting communities.
Framing 2 - Constitutional Rights Frame: In another news report, the same protest is framed
around constitutional rights and individual freedoms. The headlines and key points include:



"Second Amendment Supporters Rally Against Gun Control Measures"
"Protesters Stress the Importance of Protecting Americans' Right to Bear Arms"
Interviews with participants highlight their belief in the constitutional right to own
firearms.
Framing 3 - Youth Activism and Social Change Frame: In a third news report, the protest is
framed as a youth-led movement for social change. The headlines and key points include:



"Young Activists Take Center Stage in Call for Gun Control Reform"
"Generation Z Demonstrates Its Commitment to Shaping a Safer Future"
Interviews with student organizers underscore their determination to influence policy and
create a safer society.
In each of these frames, the central event—the protest for stricter gun control—remains the
same. However, the framing of the news stories varies significantly, emphasizing different
angles such as public safety, constitutional rights, or youth activism. Depending on the framing
135
Persuasion and Public Opinion
used by different news outlets, the audience's perception of the event and its implications may
differ. This example highlights how news framing can shape the narrative and influence public
understanding and opinions on complex issues like gun control.
In the context of framing theory, there are four key functions or aspects related to how a frame
operates:
1. Definition of a Problem: Frames define what is considered a problem or an issue in a
particular context. They help audiences understand the nature and significance of the
problem being discussed. For example, a frame might define an increase in crime rates as
a "public safety crisis."
2. Explanation of Causes: Frames offer a particular explanation or interpretation of the
causes or factors contributing to the defined problem. This helps shape the audience's
perception of why the problem exists. Using the example of crime rates, a frame might
attribute the increase in crime to economic inequality or social unrest.
3. Moral Judgment: Frames often carry a moral or evaluative dimension, providing a lens
through which the audience views the issue. They can convey whether something is right
or wrong, just or unjust, moral or immoral. For instance, a frame may pass moral
judgment on a policy by describing it as "unjust" or "discriminatory."
4. Suggested Course of Action: Frames also suggest a recommended course of action or
response to the defined problem. They guide the audience toward a specific solution or
policy direction. For example, a frame might suggest addressing high crime rates through
increased police presence and stricter law enforcement (Entman).
In summary, framing theory suggests that the way information is framed, through language,
visuals, metaphors, and narrative structures, influences how people perceive and interpret that
information. By emphasizing certain aspects (problem definition, causes, moral judgment, and
recommended actions) while downplaying others, frames can shape the audience's understanding
and attitudes toward complex issues. These frames are often used strategically by media outlets,
policymakers, and communicators to influence public opinion, support specific policies, or
advocate for particular viewpoints.
Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD)
framed from an Egyptian perspective:
Definition of the Problem: Frame:
"Ethiopian Dam Threatens Egypt's Lifeline"

In this framing, the problem is defined
as a direct threat to Egypt's primary
source of freshwater, the Nile River.
The use of the word "threatens"
emphasizes the severity of the issue.
Explanation of Causes: Frame: "Ethiopian
Unilateralism Raises Nile Water Concerns"
Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD)
framed from an Ethiopian perspective:
Definition of the Problem: Frame: "Ethiopian
Dam Embodies Sovereign Right to
Development"

In this framing, the problem is defined as
Ethiopia's need for energy and economic
development. The use of the term
"sovereign right" emphasizes Ethiopia's
perspective that the dam represents a
legitimate path to development.
136
Persuasion and Public Opinion

The cause of the problem, as framed
from the Egyptian perspective, is
attributed to Ethiopian unilateralism
and the construction of the dam
without sufficient prior agreement or
consideration for downstream nations
like Egypt. This framing places blame
on Ethiopia's actions.
Explanation of Causes: Frame: "Ethiopia's
Pursuit of Energy Self-Sufficiency and
Economic Growth"

Moral Judgment on the Issue: Frame:
"Ethiopian Dam Raises Questions of Fairness
and Equity"

From the Egyptian perspective, there's
a moral dimension to the issue. The
frame suggests that the construction of
the dam without adequate consultation
with downstream countries raises
questions about fairness and equity in
sharing the Nile's waters.
The cause of the problem, from the
Ethiopian perspective, is attributed to
Ethiopia's pursuit of energy selfsufficiency and economic growth.
Ethiopia frames the dam as a solution to
address energy needs and boost its
economy.
Moral Judgment on the Issue: Frame:
"Ethiopia's Responsible Utilization of Nile
Waters"

From the Ethiopian perspective, there's a
moral dimension to the issue. The frame
suggests that Ethiopia's utilization of Nile
waters is responsible and in line with its
development goals.
Suggested Course of Action: Frame: "Egypt
Calls for International Mediation to Safeguard Suggested Course of Action: Frame:
Nile Rights"
"Continued Tripartite Talks for Equitable Nile
Sharing"
 The Egyptian perspective suggests
that international mediation is
 The Ethiopian perspective suggests that
necessary to safeguard Egypt's rights
continued negotiations and tripartite talks
to Nile waters. This frame implies a
with Egypt and Sudan are the way
diplomatic approach to resolve the
forward to reach an equitable agreement
issue through negotiations and
on Nile sharing. This frame implies
international involvement.
Ethiopia's commitment to a diplomatic
resolution.
This framing portrays the GERD as a critical
issue for Egypt, framing it as a direct threat to This framing portrays the GERD as a vital
its water security, caused by Ethiopian
project for Ethiopia's development, emphasizing
unilateralism. It also places moral emphasis
its sovereign right to pursue economic growth
on the principles of fairness and equity and
and energy self-sufficiency. It places moral
suggests a diplomatic course of action
emphasis on Ethiopia's responsible use of Nile
through international mediation. This framing waters and suggests a diplomatic approach
is intended to garner support for Egypt's
through ongoing negotiations. This framing is
position on the matter.
intended to garner support for Ethiopia's position
on the matter.
137
Persuasion and Public Opinion
Effect of Framing on Public Opinion:
The effect of framing on public opinion is significant and can have a profound impact on how
individuals perceive and interpret information, events, and issues. Framing shapes the way
people understand and emotionally respond to a given topic or story. Here are several key effects
of framing on public opinion:
1. Agenda Setting: Framing can influence what issues and topics are considered important
by the public. When the media frames a particular issue prominently, it can elevate that
issue's importance in the minds of the audience, leading them to believe it is a top
priority.
Example: During an election year, media outlets heavily cover a candidate's stance on
healthcare reform, emphasizing it as a critical issue. As a result, the public begins to see
healthcare reform as a top priority in the election.
2. Issue Salience: Framing can affect how much attention the public pays to a specific
aspect of an issue. By highlighting certain dimensions of a problem, framing can make
particular elements stand out and capture public interest.
Example: News reports on climate change focuses on the economic impact of changing
to renewable energy sources. This frame makes the economic aspects of climate change
more significant in public discussions.
3. Perception of Causality: Framing can shape how individuals understand the causes of
problems or events. Different frames can attribute causality to various factors,
influencing how the public assigns blame or responsibility.
Example: Framing an increase in youth crime as a result of "broken families" attributes
causality to family structures, while framing it as a consequence of "poverty and limited
access to education" shifts the perception of causality to socioeconomic factors.
4. Attitude Formation: Framing can shape individuals' attitudes and opinions on specific
issues. Depending on how an issue is framed, people may be more inclined to support or
oppose certain policies or viewpoints.
Example: Framing a proposed tax policy as "tax relief for hardworking families" may
lead to more positive attitudes among those who believe in tax cuts, while others may
view it as "tax breaks for the wealthy" and form negative opinions.
5. Group Identity: Framing can reinforce or challenge group identities. People may
identify with certain frames that align with their preexisting beliefs, values, or social
group affiliations.
Example: A news outlet frames a debate on immigration as a matter of national security.
People who identify strongly with national security concerns may support stricter
138
Persuasion and Public Opinion
immigration policies, while those emphasizing humanitarian aspects may push for more
tolerant policies.
6. Political and Social Polarization: Framing can contribute to political and social
polarization by presenting issues in ways that align with partisan or ideological divides.
This can lead to a more polarized public discourse.
Example: Framing a controversial issue like gun control as a matter of "individual rights
vs. public safety" can polarize the public, with some supporting gun rights and others
advocating for stricter regulations.
7. Persuasion and Decision-Making: Framing can influence decision-making processes,
such as voting behavior or support for a cause. People may be more likely to make
decisions based on frames that resonate with their values or emotional responses.
Example: A political candidate frames their campaign as "fighting for the working class."
Voters who identify with working-class struggles may be persuaded to support the
candidate based on this frame.
These examples demonstrate how framing can shape public opinion by emphasizing different
aspects of issues, influencing emotional responses, and ultimately impacting attitudes, beliefs,
and decisions.
Evaluate framing in the following cases
Sample: Title: Egypt's Overpopulation Crisis: Cultural Traditions in Rural Areas Under Fire
Cairo, Egypt - Egypt is in the grips of a mounting overpopulation crisis, and some are
pointing fingers at deeply rooted cultural traditions in rural areas as a primary driver of this
burgeoning issue.
Definition of the Problem: Egypt's overpopulation crisis is marked by a population growth
rate that far surpasses the nation's capacity to provide essential resources and services. With a
population exceeding 104 million people, Egypt faces mounting pressure on resources such as
water, housing, healthcare, and education.
Particular Explanation of Its Causes: The overpopulation problem in Egypt is exacerbated
by cultural norms and traditions, particularly in rural regions. The expectation of larger
families as a sign of prosperity and societal pressure to have more children contribute to a
soaring birth rate. Moreover, limited access to education and healthcare services in rural areas
perpetuates these practices, making it difficult to challenge entrenched beliefs.
Moral Judgment on the Issue: Critics argue that Egypt's overpopulation issue is, in part, a
moral concern driven by cultural practices that prioritize larger families. These practices are
seen as perpetuating conditions of overcrowding, resource scarcity, and substandard living
139
Persuasion and Public Opinion
conditions. Critics argue that there is a moral imperative to address these traditions,
particularly when they hinder progress and quality of life for citizens.
Suggested Course of Action: To address Egypt's overpopulation crisis and its link to cultural
traditions, experts recommend launch of widespread educational campaigns in rural areas to
challenge the cultural norms surrounding family size and promote the benefits of smaller
families. Others recommend improving access to healthcare services, including family
planning and reproductive health services, in rural regions to empower individuals and couples
with choices. Moreover, the government should invest in rural development, including
infrastructure, education, and economic opportunities, to reduce the reliance on large families
as a safety net. It should also promote women's education and empowerment, providing
opportunities for women to make informed decisions about family size and their futures. It is
also important to encourage community leaders and influencers to advocate for change and
challenge outdated cultural norms.
Egypt's Tourism Woes: International Factors in the Spotlight
Egypt's once-thriving tourism industry is facing significant challenges, and many stakeholders
are placing the blame squarely on international factors that have disrupted the country's appeal
as a premier tourist destination.
Egypt's tourism industry is grappling with a decline in visitor numbers and revenues, resulting
in economic strain for the nation. The problem is characterized by a notable decrease in
international tourists, a trend that has had a cascading impact on businesses and employment
in the sector.
The root causes of Egypt's tourism decline are linked to international factors. Chief among
these is the perception of political instability and security concerns following the 2011
revolution. Although Egypt has made strides in ensuring safety, lingering perceptions persist,
deterring potential tourists. Additionally, the global impact of the COVID-19 pandemic has
had a devastating effect on international travel and tourism, further exacerbating Egypt's
struggles.
Critics argue that the international community bears some moral responsibility for Egypt's
tourism woes. By perpetuating negative perceptions and imposing travel restrictions due to
safety concerns, some argue that global actors have contributed to the economic hardships
faced by those in the tourism sector. There is a moral imperative, they contend, to support the
revival of Egypt's tourism industry, which provides livelihoods for millions.
To address the international factors impacting Egypt's tourism industry, Egypt should engage
with international partners and organizations to improve its image and showcase its safety
measures to potential tourists. The country should continue to invest in and promote security
measures to ensure the safety of tourists, both through policy and on-the-ground initiatives.
140
Persuasion and Public Opinion
Explore opportunities for diversifying tourism offerings, including cultural experiences, ecotourism, and adventure tourism to attract a broader range of visitors.
What is the topic?
How was the issue framed?
How did the news story frame the issue according to the four aspects of framing theory
(definition of a problem, causes, moral judgment on the issue, recommended course of
action)?
What effect could this story have on public opinion?
141
Persuasion and Public Opinion
Chapter Ten: Persuasion in Context: Political
Campaigns
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
After reading this chapter, you should be
able to:

Recognize importance of persuasion in
political campaigns.

Analyze various persuasion strategies
employed in political campaigns.

Evaluate the role of message framing,
language, and rhetoric in shaping public
perception.

Analyze real-world political campaign
examples to identify effective and
ineffective persuasion tactics.
In the context of politics, persuasion refers to the deliberate and strategic effort to influence the
beliefs, opinions, attitudes, and behaviors of individuals or groups to support a particular political
candidate, party, policy, or agenda. Political persuasion aims to sway public opinion, garner
support, and ultimately secure electoral success or policy outcomes.
Politics and persuasion are inextricably linked, and we will explore the strategies employed by
political actors to sway public opinion, win elections, and craft policies. We will also examine
the role of misinformation, fake news, and propaganda in the political sphere (next chapter).
In essence, politics can be viewed as an ongoing dialogue involving discussion, discourse,
debate, and the art of convincing others, all of which are facilitated through communication. To
elaborate further, politics is the public exchange of ideas and opinions that are often marked by
the ultimate decision, the vote.
Politicians, in particular, dedicate a considerable portion of their time to various activities that
revolve around persuasion. This includes participating in hearings, receiving briefings, attending
142
Persuasion and Public Opinion
public meetings, making official announcements, and engaging in campaign efforts. These
activities are primarily focused on convincing and influencing people.
In simpler terms, politics can be understood as a continuous conversation shaped by the
formalized processes of governance, with persuasion being at its core. Politicians use various
forms of communication to sway opinions, make their case, and ultimately achieve their goals,
which may include winning elections, passing legislation, or advocating for specific policies.
Political campaigns are intricate and multifaceted communication endeavors that extend from the
national to the local level. They encompass a wide array of activities aimed at conveying
messages related to issues, candidates, social constructs, and identities. Campaigns serve
instrumental functions, primarily task-oriented, and legitimization functions, which deal with
broader associations. Instrumental functions include behavioral activation, wherein campaigns
stimulate individuals to participate actively, like volunteering or voting, thus reinforcing existing
voter attitudes. Cognitive adjustment entails the enhancement of public awareness through
discussions of relevant issues. This awareness can lead citizens to modify their opinions or find
reasons to support their preexisting preferences. Finally, campaigns play a significant role in
legitimation by confirming the legitimacy of newly elected officials and the policies they enact
(Denton 234).
These campaigns extend beyond mere electoral processes; they are complex mechanisms that
include communication, influence, reinforcement, motivation, and education. For instance, in the
2008 U.S. Presidential campaign, Barack Obama's team engaged in a groundswell of grassroots
organizing and used digital media to mobilize supporters, showcasing how campaigns can
effectively activate behavior and stimulate political engagement.
In the 2016 U.S. Trump presidential election, the campaign was not just about picking the
President; it was like a big conversation about immigration, the economy, and other important
topics. It got people talking and made them think about what they believed. When Donald Trump
won, it wasn't just about him becoming President; it was also a sign that many people agreed
with his ideas on these topics. In the 2020 U.S. Biden presidential campaign encompassed
discussions on a wide range of pressing topics, including healthcare and racial justice, which
informed, influenced, and sometimes changed public opinion. Ultimately, these campaigns
affirm the legitimacy of elected leaders and the governance structures they institute.
Political advertising campaigns are often candidate promotion. This strategy aims to enhance
public awareness of a specific individual, with the intention of garnering either support or
opposition. A success political campaign advertisement is the "Yes We Can" video released
during Barack Obama's 2008 presidential campaign. This video was a powerful example of
person-oriented advertising and became an iconic moment in political advertising history.
In the "Yes We Can" video, celebrities and ordinary citizens all recited Barack Obama's speech,
which included phrases like "Yes, we can," emphasizing hope, unity, and the potential for
positive change. The video's message was clear: Barack Obama's candidacy represented a
transformative moment in American politics, and by supporting him, voters could be part of that
change. The video successfully engaged and mobilized voters, harnessing the power of social
143
Persuasion and Public Opinion
media to spread its message widely. It demonstrated the potential of person-oriented advertising
in the digital age, where individuals and celebrities could come together to amplify a candidate's
message and inspire millions to participate in the political process.
One of the successful advertisements from Donald Trump's 2016 presidential campaign was the
"Donald J. Trump for President Official TV Commercial." In this ad, the campaign focused on
key issues like immigration and national security, which resonated with a significant portion of
the American population.
The advertisement used strong imagery and provocative language to convey its message. It
featured images of people crossing the border illegally, combined with clips of Hillary Clinton,
the opposing candidate, talking about immigration reform. The ad also emphasized the need for a
strong leader to address these concerns.
One of the memorable lines in the ad was, "In Hillary Clinton's America, the system stays rigged
against Americans." This line played into the idea of political establishment and tapped into the
sentiment of many voters who felt alienated by the system. The ad was successful in rallying
Trump's base and appealing to those who were concerned about immigration and national
security issues. It became a central piece of Trump's media campaign and contributed to his
victory in the 2016 election. It's important to note that the effectiveness of political
advertisements can vary widely depending on the audience and the political climate. What works
in one campaign may not necessarily work in another, and the impact of an advertisement can be
a subject of debate and analysis.
Political campaigns are organized and strategic efforts undertaken by individuals, political
parties, or interest groups to achieve specific political goals. These campaigns are most
commonly associated with elections, where candidates seek to win public office, but they can
also focus on advocating for specific policies, raising awareness about political issues, or
influencing public opinion. Election Campaigns are perhaps the most well-known type of
political campaigns. They focus on candidates running for public office, such as presidential,
parliamentary, or local elections. The goal is to persuade voters to support a particular candidate.
Issue Advocacy Campaigns center around specific policy issues or causes rather than individual
candidates. These campaigns often promote or oppose legislation, ballot initiatives, or public
policies.
Key characteristics of political campaigns include:

Candidates or Causes: Political campaigns can revolve around candidates running for
public office, such as presidents, governors, senators, or local officials. They can also center
on promoting or opposing specific policy initiatives or causes.

Messaging: Campaigns use various forms of communication, including speeches, debates,
advertising, social media, and grassroots organizing, to convey their messages to the public.
144
Persuasion and Public Opinion

Voter Engagement: A significant part of political campaigns involves engaging with voters.
This includes efforts to register voters, mobilize supporters to vote, and persuade undecided
voters.

Fundraising: Campaigns require financial resources to operate effectively. Candidates and
organizations involved in campaigns raise money to fund advertising, staff salaries, travel,
and other campaign expenses.

Strategy: Campaigns develop detailed strategies to target specific demographics, geographic
areas, and issues. This includes identifying swing voters and crafting persuasive messages
tailored to different audiences.
Overall, political campaigns are dynamic and multifaceted efforts aimed at persuading voters,
influencing public opinion, and achieving political objectives, whether that's winning an election,
passing a ballot measure, or advancing a particular policy agenda.
Common Persuasive Techniques used in Political Campaigns
Persuasive techniques are critical tools used in political campaigns to influence voters' opinions,
attitudes, and behaviors. These techniques are designed to make candidates, parties, and policies
more appealing to the electorate. Here are common persuasive techniques employed in political
campaigns:
Emotional Appeals: Candidates often use emotions such as hope, fear, empathy, and anger to
connect with voters. Emotional appeals can create a personal bond between the candidate and the
audience, making the message more memorable and relatable.
Fear Appeals: Candidates may use fear as a persuasive tactic by emphasizing potential negative
consequences if the opponent is elected or if certain policies are enacted. Some campaigns use
fear-based messaging to highlight potential threats or risks associated with their opponents or
certain policies. They present themselves as the solution to these perceived threats, promising
safety and security. Fear of economic downturns, national security threats, or loss of rights can
motivate voters to support a candidate.
Storytelling: Candidates often share personal anecdotes or stories that resonate with voters.
Narratives help convey the candidate's values, experiences, and vision for the future.
Social Proof: Demonstrating that many others support the candidate can influence undecided
voters. This may involve highlighting endorsements, showcasing large campaign rallies, or
sharing testimonials from supporters.
Slogans and Catchphrases: Memorable slogans and catchphrases simplify campaign messaging
and make it easier for voters to remember key points.
145
Persuasion and Public Opinion
Framing: Candidates frame issues and policies in a way that aligns with their positions and
values. Effective framing can influence how voters perceive a particular topic or problem.
Effective political campaigns often use a combination of these persuasive techniques, adapted to
the specific context and objectives of the campaign. The goal is to engage voters, build support,
and secure electoral success.
Appeals to Values: Candidates may emphasize shared values with voters, such as freedom,
justice, or family values. Aligning with voters' core beliefs can create a strong emotional
connection
Political use of language and discourse
In the context of politics, language is frequently crafted to elicit emotional responses rather than
encourage careful consideration. Political language can serve as a creative tool to ignite strong
emotions and foster dedication. Broadly speaking, the central aim of politics is to influence,
maneuver, or shape how the audience perceives information. Political communication
encompasses a battle for control over interpretation, status, authority, and resources. Therefore, a
skilled politician will employ particular language techniques to strengthen prevailing
convictions, attitudes, and principles (Denton 61).
In a simplified manner, there are two perspectives to consider: Is the container half empty, or is it
half full? If the perceived "reality" is that the container is half empty, it may lead to feelings of
discouragement, prompting the need to seek additional resources for more liquid. On the other
hand, if the container is seen as half full, it fosters optimism and hope, suggesting that adding
more liquid won't be challenging. Even though the factual situation remains unchanged, one's
viewpoint or interpretation of the facts significantly impacts their attitudes and actions (Denton
61).
The example provided above is quite simple, but many of today's political campaigns and
legislative issues in Egypt stem from similar foundations. Are we overly reliant on imported
energy resources? Should we explore Egypt's domestic energy reserves further, such as offshore
natural gas fields in the Mediterranean? What is the environmental risk associated with these
actions? Whose perspective will ultimately shape our decisions? Consider some real-world
consequences in the Egyptian context. It might entail increasing taxes on gasoline to fund
exploration or decrease consumption. The government could introduce new regulations on
vehicle fuel efficiency, potentially raising car prices. In the absence of new discoveries, there
may be restrictions on gasoline usage. While the fact of Egypt's reliance on imported energy is
undisputed, one's interpretation of this fact will influence their attitudes and behaviors (Denton
61).
146
Persuasion and Public Opinion
Here's a political example from an Egyptian context that illustrates how different perspectives
can influence attitudes and behavior regarding the question of whether Egypt is overly reliant on
imported energy resources:
Example: Renewable Energy Policy Debate in Egypt
In Egypt, there is an ongoing debate about the country's energy policy, particularly its reliance on
imported fossil fuels versus the promotion of renewable energy sources such as solar and wind
power.


Supporters of Renewable Energy (Candidate X) argue that Egypt should reduce its
dependence on imported fossil fuels, which are subject to price fluctuations and
geopolitical risks. They frame the shift to renewables as a way to enhance energy
security, create domestic jobs, and mitigate the environmental impact of fossil fuels.
Candidate X proposes incentives for solar and wind energy projects, aiming to transition
Egypt towards sustainability.
Advocates for Fossil Fuels (Candidate Y) contend that Egypt's fossil fuel industry,
including natural gas production, is a vital source of revenue and employment. They
argue that sudden transitions to renewable energy could disrupt the economy and lead to
job losses. Candidate Y emphasizes the reliability of fossil fuels in meeting Egypt's
energy needs and suggests that continued investment in this sector is essential for
economic stability.
In this political scenario, both Candidate X and Candidate Y have access to the same information
about Egypt's energy situation, but their interpretations and perspectives differ:


Candidate X's perspective is that Egypt is "overly reliant on imported energy resources,"
and they propose a shift towards renewable energy to address this issue.
Candidate Y's perspective is that Egypt's reliance on imported energy resources is
balanced by its domestic fossil fuel industry, and abrupt changes could have negative
economic consequences.
These differing viewpoints influence their attitudes and behavior. Candidate X advocates for
renewable energy policies, while Candidate Y defends the importance of the fossil fuel sector.
This demonstrates how political decisions related to energy policy can be shaped by varying
interpretations of the same fact: Egypt's energy resource dependency.
In the realm of politics, language plays a significant role in shaping, modifying, and preserving
the society. Political symbols serve as the direct connection between individuals and the
established social order, essentially acting as triggers for behavior. The right symbols have the
power to persuade individuals to embrace specific policies, support various causes, and promote
compliance with government authority. It's important to understand that political symbols
preserve the existing culture, political convictions, and values that define a society (Denton 62).
147
Persuasion and Public Opinion
Message Crafting: Strategic Uses of Political Language
Persuasion in a political message refers to the deliberate use of communication
techniques and strategies to influence the attitudes, opinions, and behaviors of individuals or
groups regarding a political issue, candidate, party, or policy. Political persuasion is a
fundamental aspect of political campaigns, advocacy efforts, and governance, and it plays a
crucial role in shaping public opinion and decision-making. Here are key elements of persuasion
in the context of political messages.
Political language serves as a means to engage in discussions, debates, and negotiations
concerning various issues and legislative matters. It's important to note that political rhetoric is
not impartial; rather, it promotes a specific set of attitudes, convictions, and values. In essence,
political language is a tool for advocacy, aimed at constructing a symbolic reality from a
particular viewpoint to serve a distinct purpose.
Reinforcement. The process of persuasion can be quite challenging. In many cases, political
communication is not aimed at changing existing attitudes but rather at solidifying and
strengthening pre-existing beliefs and viewpoints. Whether it's political discourse, advertising, or
even presidential addresses, the goal often centers around reinforcing the public's inclinations
that align with the message's source. Political parties and candidates typically have specific
constituency groups that they prioritize, and effective persuaders customize their messages to
align with the beliefs, attitudes, and values held by these constituencies.
Let's consider an example from Egypt that demonstrates the concept of reinforcement in political
communication related to a domestic issue:
Example: Subsidy Reform
In Egypt, a recurring domestic issue is the reform of government subsidies, particularly those
related to basic commodities like food and fuel. The government has proposed subsidy reforms
aimed at reducing the fiscal burden and redirecting funds toward other critical sectors like
healthcare and education.


Party A advocates for subsidy reform by reinforcing the belief that it is necessary for the
country's economic stability and future development. They argue that maintaining heavy
subsidies is unsustainable and diverts resources from essential services. Party A uses
various communication channels to emphasize that subsidy reform is crucial to ensuring a
strong economy and improving public services. Party A's messages reinforce the belief
that subsidy reform is vital for Egypt's economic stability and development, resonating
with middle and upper classes who prioritize long-term economic health.
Party B oppose subsidy reform, arguing that it could lead to higher prices for essential
goods and negatively impact low-income citizens. They reinforce the belief that the
government should prioritize protecting vulnerable populations. Party B tailors their
148
Persuasion and Public Opinion
messaging to appeal to those who value social safety nets and are concerned about the
potential consequences of subsidy cuts.
In this scenario, both Party A and Party B are not trying to change the fundamental beliefs of
their respective constituencies but rather to reinforce existing attitudes:
Inoculation. Inoculation is another messaging strategy designed to strengthen existing attitudes
and bolster resistance to attitude change. By fortifying these pre-existing beliefs, individuals
become less vulnerable to future persuasive efforts. What makes this strategy intriguing is that
when a persuader acknowledges counterarguments or presents negative information related to
their own stance, audiences are not only more inclined to believe the speaker's message but also
less likely to consider counterarguments or new information in the future. Essentially, they have
developed immunity against future attempts to alter their attitudes. This approach proves most
valuable in political campaigns, particularly in building resistance to the impact of political
attacks from opponents.
Example: Inoculation in a Political Campaign
Imagine a political candidate, Candidate X, who is running for office and has strong support for a
specific policy, such as healthcare reform. Candidate X anticipates that opponents will launch a
campaign to discredit their healthcare reform proposal.
Candidate X then presents a well-reasoned and evidence-backed defense of their healthcare
reform plan. They explain how it is designed to control healthcare costs, improve access for all
citizens, and ultimately benefit the majority of the population.
Simplification. Simplification is a common approach in political communication, where
messages are intentionally made clear and uncomplicated. This simplicity extends to the choice
of words, sentence structure, and the level of detail provided. Typically, complex issues are
simplified. Political catchphrases and slogans are used to convey beliefs or implied courses of
action clearly. For instance, "America, love it or leave it" communicates a clear call to action and
a particular attitude. Similarly, "The War on Terror" defines the actions taken, clarifying the
purpose of military operations on foreign soil. In essence, the aim of political discourse is to
render the world, our challenges, solutions, and actions comprehensible and accessible to a
broader audience. In an Egyptian example, the government adopts a simplified messaging
strategy to communicate the benefits of infrastructure investment. They use clear and
straightforward language to convey that these investments will lead to "Better Roads, More
Power, and Improved Services." This catchphrase summarizes the basis of the initiative by
focusing on improvements that citizens can easily understand.
149
Persuasion and Public Opinion
Generalizations. Along with simplifying messages, it is common to encounter broad
generalizations that are often open, vague, and lacking in specific details. These generalizations
tend to present sweeping assumptions, conclusions, or suggestions of causation. Politicians make
propositions using broad generalizations in an effort to gain as much agreement as possible. For
instance, who would object to working toward "a more prosperous economy, increased job
opportunities, higher incomes, and comprehensive healthcare for all citizens?"
Narratives and Storytelling. Persuaders have a powerful tool at their disposal when it comes to
establishing a sense of closeness with their audience: the use of an individual to personify or
represent the ideas conveyed in their message.
Narratives are stories that emerge from a specific viewpoint or perspective, often told in the first
person. These stories have the capacity to evoke emotions and elicit emotional responses from
those who hear them. In the realm of politics, narratives find frequent use as they allow
politicians to recount the stories of their lives or articulate their political positions on various
issues. Additionally, narratives are employed to simplify intricate matters, events, or situations.
Candidates share personal stories and narratives to connect with voters on a human level. These
stories can include humble beginnings, overcoming adversity, or experiences that shaped their
values and priorities. When crafted effectively, they capture the attention of the audience and
infuse a sense of drama into the message. Trump often used personal anecdotes and stories to
connect with his supporters. He shared narratives from his business career and personal life to
illustrate points and build a relatable image. At campaign rallies, Trump used storytelling
techniques to energize his supporters. He shared stories of his campaign journey, victories, and
future plans, creating a sense of unity and shared purpose among his base.
President Obama (2012), addressing students at the University of North Carolina in April 2012,
told the story of his grandparents:
And I think about my own life. My grandfather had the chance to go to
college because this country decided that every returning veteran of
World War II should be able to afford it through the GI Bill. My mom was
a single mom—my dad wasn’t around—and she raised two kids by herself
with some help from my grandparents because she was able to get grants
and work her way through school. And I’m only here today, and Michelle
is only where she is today, because scholarships and student loans gave
us a shot at a great education. That’s how we succeeded.
It has become a common practice for political candidates to employ video documentaries
portraying their life stories as a means of establishing a connection with voters. These video
documentaries follow a narrative structure, showcasing the candidate's early life, focal events in
their journey, and their path into politics. Typically, these films feature the presence of close
friends, family members, and devoted supporters of the candidate. Through the narratives
presented in these documentaries, audiences forge an emotional connection with the candidate,
150
Persuasion and Public Opinion
driven by the compelling story being told. Narratives, in this context, serve as a vehicle for
conveying both factual and emotional information to the audience (Borchers 314).
Polarization. Polarization is a notable aspect of political language, capable of both establishing
similarities and distinctions among people, issues, and ideas. Interestingly, at times, the most
effective way to define a particular issue or stance is by highlighting what it is not, drawing
contrasts with opposing concepts. An example of this is evident in the way former President
Reagan conveyed American values such as freedom and free enterprise by comparing them to
the contrasting values of Russia.
Alternatively, polarization can take a more direct form by simply labeling the opposition, a
particular issue, or an ideology as "bad." While this form of polarization often divides
individuals with opposing beliefs, it also serves to unite those who share similar convictions.
Furthermore, polarization aids in clarifying positions, actions, and elements of ideology. Some
political analysts argue that the intensity of political campaigns, the prevalent "us versus them"
perspective on most issues, and the "all or none" approach to winning at any cost have all
contributed to the polarization observed in the nation.
Issue-Based Messaging is a campaign strategy where candidates center their communication
efforts on specific policy topics that are of significant importance to the demographic they are
trying to reach. Instead of broad, generalized appeals, candidates delve into particular issues like
healthcare, education, the economy, or climate change. By doing so, they aim to connect with
voters who consider these subjects their top priorities. Essentially, candidates articulate their
positions and proposed solutions on these key issues to win the support of individuals who share
these concerns and are more likely to align with their policy proposals. This strategy
demonstrates to voters that the candidate understands and shares their values and policy
preferences, thereby increasing the likelihood of earning their votes.
During his 2016 presidential campaign, Donald Trump employed a notable example of issuebased messaging centered on immigration and border security. He consistently emphasized the
following points: Trump framed immigration as a critical issue, arguing that stricter border
control and immigration policies were necessary to protect American jobs and national security.
Key Phrases:
1. "Build the Wall": Trump's signature slogan called for the construction of a border wall
between the United States and Mexico to deter illegal immigration.
2. "America First": He asserted that his immigration policies would prioritize the interests
of American citizens and workers over those of undocumented immigrants.
3. "Criminal Aliens": Trump frequently highlighted cases of crimes committed by
undocumented immigrants to underscore the need for stricter immigration enforce
This issue-based messaging strategy resonated with a segment of the electorate concerned about
immigration and border security. It contributed to Trump's appeal among voters who believed
151
Persuasion and Public Opinion
that stronger immigration policies were essential for safeguarding American jobs and safety. It
also set the tone for his administration's immigration policies during his presidency.
During his 2020 presidential campaign, Joe Biden utilized issue-based messaging, particularly in
the context of healthcare, as follows: Biden emphasized the need for expanding and improving
healthcare access and affordability for all Americans, especially in the face of the COVID-19
pandemic.
Key Phrases:
1. "Build on the Affordable Care Act (ACA)": Biden advocated for building upon the ACA
(Obamacare) to protect and expand healthcare coverage, including adding a public
option.
2. "COVID-19 Response": He promised to lead a comprehensive and science-based
response to the pandemic, emphasizing the importance of accessible testing and
treatment.
3. "Lowering Healthcare Costs": Biden proposed measures to lower prescription drug prices
and make healthcare more affordable for families.
Persuasion Strategies: Common Political Language Devices
This review will explore prevalent methods of language manipulation designed to elicit
particular reactions in individuals
Labeling. Labeling proves effective as it passes judgment by establishing either positive or
negative connections. For instance, our behavior and perception of an individual significantly
vary when we hear descriptions such as "inquisitive" or "nosy," "cool" or "frigid," "reflective" or
"moody," "thorough" or "picky," and "forgetful" or "senile." Labels communicate what is
significant and what expectations to hold, while social norms dictate how to engage with those
defined. Moreover, labeling necessitates judgment and evaluation, potentially leading to misuse
and bias (Denton).
Former President Donald Trump used labeling as a prominent strategy in his political campaigns
in several ways. Trump often employed derogatory nicknames to label his political opponents.
For instance, he famously referred to Hillary Clinton as "Crooked Hillary" and Joe Biden as
"Sleepy Joe." These labels aimed to tarnish their reputations and suggest incompetence or
dishonesty. Trump also frequently labeled mainstream media outlets as "Fake News." This label
was used to undermine the credibility of critical news coverage and to rally his supporters
against media organizations that scrutinized his actions. Trump used the term "Deep State" to
label career bureaucrats and intelligence officials as part of a supposed hidden agenda against his
152
Persuasion and Public Opinion
presidency. This label played into conspiracy theories and amplified distrust in government
institutions. These labeling techniques were designed to simplify complex issues, rally his base,
and shape public perception. They were also divisive and contributed to polarization in American
politics, as they framed issues and opponents in stark and often negative terms.
Slanting. Slanting represents a form of deliberate misrepresentation where specific implications
are implied by selectively excluding critical information. For instance, a politician may assert
that the current employment rate is the highest in the nation's history, while in reality, the
percentage of employed individuals could be at an all-time low. During the 1999 Balkans
bombing, NATO conducted daily press briefings showcasing the precise accuracy of "smart
bombs." Regrettably, these briefings neglected to mention the percentage of bombs that failed to
hit their intended targets. Without resorting to outright falsehoods, the presented information
created a distorted impression that did not fit with the complete set of facts (Denton 72).
Ridicule. Ridicule is a rhetorical technique that subjects a person, group, action, or idea to
mockery and disrespect. It attacks the fundamental value and credibility of individuals and
concepts, thereby jeopardizing any perceived or claimed legitimacy. By evoking emotional
reactions, ridicule highlights the counterintuitive elements of an argument or course of action,
portraying them as foolish, absurd, and contrary to common sense. Ridicule is a very persuasive
tool because it is almost impossible to counterattack ridicule. Also it infuriates opponents, who
then often react in a way that is not to their benefit. Notably, ridicule does not rely on presenting
evidence or factual information (Denton)
Former President Donald Trump frequently used ridicule as a rhetorical device during his
political career and presidency. Trump frequently used sarcasm to ridicule his opponents or
detractors. He would make sarcastic comments during rallies, interviews, and on social media to
mock individuals or ideas he disagreed with. Trump used his Twitter account to hurl insults and
ridicule at political opponents, media figures, and even foreign leaders. His tweets often included
derogatory language and name-calling. For example,
Tweet: "Why would Kim Jong-un insult me by calling me 'old,' when I would NEVER call him
'short and fat?' Oh well, I try so hard to be his friend - and maybe someday that will happen!"
In this tweet, Trump responds to an insult from North Korean leader Kim Jong-un by using
sarcasm and humor to ridicule him. Instead of escalating the conflict, Trump ironically suggests
that he's trying to befriend Kim despite the insult, highlighting the contrast between the two
leaders' behavior.
Tweet: "Little @MichaelDell, the man behind Dell Computers, doesn’t have a clue as to how to
spend his money, or what causes are good or bad for America! He just wants to be one of the
'cool' guys. He’ll be gone soon!"
153
Persuasion and Public Opinion
In this tweet, Trump ridicules Michael Dell, the CEO of Dell Technologies, who criticized
Trump by implying that he lacks an understanding of how to use his wealth for the benefit of
America. Trump also suggests that Dell is merely trying to fit in with a certain social group. The
tweet ends with a prediction that Dell will not be relevant for much longer, adding a mocking
tone to the message.
Repetition and Consistency: Campaigns frequently repeat key messages to reinforce their core
themes and ensure that voters remember them. Repetition ensures that a candidate's key
messages are heard by voters multiple times. People often need repeated exposure to a message
before it registers and is remembered. Consistency in messaging, including using the same
slogans, catchphrases, or policy priorities, helps voters recognize and remember the candidate's
platform and identity. When voters encounter a consistent message across various campaign
materials and appearances, they are more likely to recall it when it matters, such as on Election
Day. Throughout his 2016 campaign, Donald Trump consistently used the slogan "Make
America Great Again" as his central message. This slogan was prominently displayed on
campaign merchandise, rally podiums, and in his speeches. It resonated with voters who felt that
America needed a change and wanted to see a return to what they perceived as a more
prosperous past. Joe Biden's 2020 campaign centered around the message "Build Back Better."
This slogan was prominently featured on campaign materials and in his speeches. It
communicated his vision for recovery and progress in the face of challenges. This repetition
helped voters associate Biden with specific policy priorities and the idea of rebuilding and
improving the nation.
Slogans. Slogans represent expressions or phrases that offer guidance or convey messages to
individuals. Throughout history, protesters have utilized slogans by vocalizing them, printing
them on pamphlets, displaying them on clothing and buttons, and posting them on various
platforms like billboards, bumper stickers, subways, and the Internet. In today's media-driven
society, slogans have gained widespread popularity. These authors emphasize the potency of
slogans because they can succinctly capture the ideas or themes one wishes to link with a
candidate, cause, issue, or event using just a few words. Slogans also possess an emotional
element that triggers responses from the audience. They serve to endorse the candidate or
movement and highlight the issues that hold significance for those seeking to persuade others.
For instance, "Bread, Freedom, and Social Justice" (‫)خبز وحرية وعدالة اجتماعية‬: This slogan was
prominently used during the Egyptian revolution of 2011. It encapsulated the core demands of
the protesters, calling for affordable food (bread), political freedom, and social justice. "Egypt
First" (‫)مصر أولا‬: This slogan has been employed in various Egyptian political campaigns,
emphasizing a focus on Egypt's national interests and sovereignty. "Our Youth, Our Hope"
(‫)شبابنا أملنا‬: This slogan is often employed to express faith in Egypt's youth as drivers of progress
and positive change.
154
Persuasion and Public Opinion
Messaging and framing
Framing in political campaigns refers to the strategic presentation of an issue, message,
or candidate in a way that influences how voters perceive it. It involves shaping the narrative and
context around a particular topic or individual to emphasize certain aspects while downplaying
others. The goal of framing is to influence public opinion, create a favorable image, or advance a
particular agenda.
In political campaigns, having a theme is crucial. A theme is a carefully crafted
combination of what voters desire, what the candidate offers, and what the opponent represents.
Public opinion polls assist candidates in shaping a theme that captures voter concerns. Themes
can revolve around various topics like the economy, peace, prosperity, participation, hope,
leadership, and change. Campaign slogans often mirror these themes. For instance, slogans like
"Yes, America can" (George W. Bush, 2004), "Change we can believe in" (Barack Obama,
2008), and "Forward" (Barack Obama, 2012) are examples of how campaign themes are
expressed to connect with the electorate. In Egypt, during a presidential campaign, a candidate
might adopt a theme centered around "National Unity and Progress," which would aim to
resonate with voters' desire for a cohesive and prosperous nation. A campaign slogan like
"Together for a Stronger Egypt" could reflect this theme, emphasizing unity and advancement as
key priorities.
Analysts who study the electoral process and various methods of political persuasion emphasize
the influential role of the media. They highlight how the media has the substantial power to
shape people's attitudes by framing their stories and preparing news consumers for what they are
about to see or read. The media's coverage, narratives, and framing can significantly affect how
individuals think and feel about political topics, candidates, and policies. This influence can
ultimately shape their attitudes and opinions. Media outlets often present stories and information
in a specific way, emphasizing certain aspects while downplaying others. This framing can shape
how audiences interpret and respond to the news (Perloff).
During his political career and presidential campaigns, Donald Trump employed several key
frames and narratives to convey his messages and connect with his supporters. Some of the
prominent frames and narratives associated with Trump include:
"America First" Frame: Trump consistently emphasized an "America First" approach, which
positioned the interests of the United States as his top priority. This narrative included a focus on
trade policies, immigration, and international agreements, with the aim of protecting American
jobs and industries.
"Anti-Establishment" Frame: Trump portrayed himself as an outsider who would challenge
the political establishment. He argued that career politicians and Washington elites were
responsible for many of the country's problems, and he positioned himself as a disruptor who
would bring change.
155
Persuasion and Public Opinion
"Economic Success" Frame: Trump frequently touted his administration's economic
achievements, including low unemployment rates, stock market performance, and tax cuts. This
narrative aimed to highlight his stewardship of a strong economy.
"Fake News" Frame: Trump popularized the term "fake news" to criticize media outlets he
viewed as biased or unfavorable. This frame allowed him to discredit negative coverage and
create doubt about the accuracy of reporting.
These frames and narratives were central to Trump's communication strategy and played a
significant role in shaping his political brand and connecting with his base of supporters. They
often drew attention, sparked controversy, and framed policy debates during his time in office.
Egyptian candidates could also use frames to connect with Egyptian voters. They could use an
"Economic Development and Investment" Frame: This narrative focuses on Egypt's
economic growth and development efforts. It highlights initiatives to attract foreign investment,
create jobs, and improve the standard of living. Or the candidates could have a "Tourism
Revival" Narrative: This narrative emphasizes the importance of Egypt's tourism industry. It
often includes efforts to promote Egypt's historical sites, resorts, and cultural attractions to attract
tourists. With a very young population, candidates could also promote a "Youth
Empowerment" Frame: This frame centers on empowering Egypt's youth, addressing their
aspirations, and providing opportunities for education and employment.
156
Persuasion and Public Opinion
Chapter Eleven: Propaganda and Information
Warfare
Overview

Define propaganda and information
warfare

Identify common propaganda techniques
and strategies employed in various
contexts.

Explore the role of technology and social
media in the dissemination of propaganda
and disinformation.
Propaganda and Information Warfare are powerful tools of persuasion and influence that
have played pivotal roles in shaping history and contemporary society. Propaganda involves the
deliberate manipulation of information to convey specific messages or narratives, often aimed at
swaying public opinion, fostering allegiance, or advancing political agendas. Information
Warfare, on the other hand, encompasses a broader spectrum of activities, including
cyberattacks, disinformation campaigns, and psychological operations, all designed to exploit
vulnerabilities in communication channels. In an era of digital interconnectedness, understanding
these concepts is crucial. This introductory paragraph sets the stage for a deeper exploration of
the strategies, ethical implications, and countermeasures related to propaganda and information
warfare.
In today's world, understanding contemporary propaganda has never been more vital. Renee
Hobbs, in the book Mind Over Media: Propaganda Education for a Digital Age, argues that
propaganda is more pervasive and sophisticated than ever before, and that it is essential for
people to be able to identify and critically evaluate the media messages they consume. The rise
of digital propaganda has a significant impact on both the general public and policymakers.
Through the use of bots, certain ideas are amplified to create a false sense of popularity, while
trolls target individuals with the aim of suppressing or marginalizing ideas they oppose.
Propaganda has evolved into a lucrative industry, employing personalization algorithms and
machine learning for dissemination. Digital platforms provide propagandists with tools like
157
Persuasion and Public Opinion
sentiment analysis, which utilizes natural language processing and text analysis to assess and
react to people's emotional expressions in online interactions (Hobbs)
In today's world, numerous individuals actively engage in the creation of persuasive propaganda.
Political leaders on a global scale employ it as a means to shape public opinion. Often,
conspiracy theories and falsehoods are wielded to disparage leaders from other nations,
governmental bodies, and political adversaries alike. Propagandists employ various tactics to
achieve their objectives. Some rely on provoking anger or outrage to capture attention, while
others repetitively emphasize simple slogans until they become ingrained but thoughtless
catchphrases. Additionally, more sophisticated techniques are employed by disinformation
experts who orchestrate online manipulation campaigns, misleading journalists into reporting
false information. Some propagandists establish think tanks, bolstering their credibility by
producing research that aligns with their own viewpoints. Such propaganda can sway
policymakers, leading to skewed perceptions of issues of public significance (Hobbs).
Propaganda Defined
In their book Age of Propaganda, Anthony Pratkanis and Elliot Aronson define propaganda as
"the intentional attempt to influence the attitudes, beliefs, or actions of others through the use of
suggestion, manipulation, or deceit" (1992, p. 1). They argue that propaganda is used in all
aspects of our lives, from advertising and marketing to politics and the media.
Pratkanis and Aronson explain that propaganda can be used to promote a variety of agendas,
both good and bad. For example, propaganda can be used to promote public health campaigns,
such as those against smoking or drunk driving. However, it can also be used to promote hatred
and violence, such as the propaganda used by the Nazis during World War II.
Both propaganda and persuasion share the goal of shaping attitudes, but they differ significantly
in terms of their nature and approach. Propaganda can be defined as a method of communication
where those in positions of authority within a governing body exert substantial control over the
dissemination of information. This control often extends to the use of mass or social media,
where language and symbols are employed in a manner that can be deceptive and manipulative.
It's essential to highlight several critical distinctions between propaganda and persuasion (Perloff
34).
Persuasion and propaganda are both communication techniques that aim to influence people's
beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors, but they differ in several key ways:
1. Intent and Purpose:
o Persuasion: Persuasion seeks to genuinely inform, educate, or convince an
audience by presenting facts, logical arguments, and evidence to support a
158
Persuasion and Public Opinion
particular viewpoint. The intent is typically to achieve a mutually beneficial
outcome.
o Propaganda: Propaganda is often driven by a specific agenda, typically
controlled by those in power or with a vested interest. Its primary purpose is to
manipulate or deceive the audience to promote a particular ideology, political
stance, or agenda. It may use emotional appeals, misinformation, or selective
presentation of facts to achieve its goals.
2. Transparency:


Persuasion: Persuasion aims for transparency and honesty in presenting information. It
encourages critical thinking and allows the audience to make informed decisions based
on the presented arguments.
Propaganda: Propaganda often lacks transparency and can involve deception or
manipulation. It may use techniques like cherry-picking data, emotional manipulation, or
even falsehoods to achieve its objectives.
3. Control and Source:


Persuasion: In persuasion, the communicator typically respects the autonomy of the
audience, allowing them to make their own decisions. The source of persuasion is usually
open about its identity and intentions.
Propaganda: Propaganda often involves a centralized authority or group with a hidden
agenda. The source may not be transparent about its true intentions, and the message is
controlled to serve the interests of the propagandists.
4. Outcome:
o Persuasion: Persuasion aims for a genuine change in attitude or behavior based
on well-structured and rational arguments. It respects the individual's right to
accept or reject the message.
o Propaganda: Propaganda seeks to achieve compliance or conformity to a specific
belief or action, often without regard for the audience's informed consent. It may
prioritize conformity over critical thinking.
In summary, while both persuasion and propaganda involve influencing people's beliefs and
actions, persuasion relies on transparent, honest, and ethical communication to inform and
convince, whereas propaganda often employs manipulation, deception, and a hidden agenda to
advance a specific interest or ideology.
Here are some recent examples of propaganda campaigns:

The Russian invasion of Ukraine: Russia has used a variety of propaganda and
information warfare techniques to justify its invasion of Ukraine and to undermine
Western support for Ukraine. For example, Russia has spread disinformation about
Ukrainian biolabs and the Azov Battalion.
159
Persuasion and Public Opinion




The use of social media to spread disinformation about COVID-19: During the
COVID-19 pandemic, social media was used to spread a lot of false and misleading
information about the virus, the vaccines, and other related topics. This disinformation
can lead to people making poor decisions about their health and safety.
The use of deepfakes to discredit political opponents: Deepfakes have been used to
spread disinformation about political opponents in a number of recent elections. For
example, in the 2020 US presidential election, a deepfake was used to make it look like
Joe Biden was calling for violence against Donald Trump supporters.
The spread of disinformation about climate change: Fossil fuel companies and other
vested interests have been spreading disinformation about climate change for decades.
This disinformation aims to downplay the risks of climate change and to sow doubt about
the need for action.
The use of propaganda to promote extremism: White nationalist and other extremist
groups are increasingly using propaganda to spread their hateful messages and recruit
new members. The Islamic State (ISIS) used social media platforms and sophisticated
online propaganda to recruit followers and spread its extremist ideology. The group's
propaganda efforts played a significant role in its global recruitment drive.
Propaganda stands apart from advertising and advocacy due to its distinctive characteristics and
objectives. Unlike advertising or advocacy, propaganda seeks a wide-reaching influence, aiming
to saturate mainstream media with its messaging. The primary goal of propaganda is to secure
the compliance of a broad mass audience and motivate them to either take specific actions or
refrain from doing so, all in alignment with the propagandist's agenda. To exert such influence
over mass audiences, propaganda necessitates the active involvement and control of major
communication channels. This implies that only individuals and organizations with significant
wealth and power have the means to orchestrate and sustain propaganda campaigns (Soules 6).
Political propaganda is typically orchestrated by a central authority, which can be a government,
political party, or interest group. These entities have well-defined objectives in mind when
employing propaganda techniques. Agitation propaganda is a particular type that seeks to
provoke its target audience into taking action, whether it be for revolution, warfare, increased
productivity, or rapid societal transformation. This form of propaganda is marked by its high
visibility but is often short-lived due to the challenges of sustaining such intensity. To be
effective, propaganda needs to establish an all-encompassing atmosphere of persuasion, utilizing
all available forms of media and leaving no room for competing viewpoints to emerge (Soules
6).
160
Persuasion and Public Opinion
Information Warfare Defined
Information warfare refers to the use of information, disinformation, and various forms of
communication to achieve strategic objectives in a conflict or competition. It involves
manipulating, disrupting, or influencing the flow of information to gain an advantage, shape
perceptions, and ultimately achieve a desired outcome. Information warfare can encompass a
range of tactics, including cyberattacks, psychological operations, propaganda dissemination,
and the spreading of misinformation or fake news. It is often employed by governments,
organizations, or individuals to exert control, destabilize adversaries, or advance their interests in
the information domain.
The significance of information warfare in the digital age is profound and multifaceted. It has
reshaped the dynamics of conflicts, politics, and the global information landscape in several
ways:
1. Amplification of Influence: The digital age has given rise to powerful platforms for
disseminating information, making it easier for state and non-state actors to amplify their
influence. Social media, in particular, allows messages to reach a global audience rapidly.
2. Weaponization of Information: Information has become a weapon in conflicts and
competitions. Disinformation, fake news, and propaganda are used strategically to
manipulate public opinion, undermine trust, and sow discord, often with the aim of
achieving political or geopolitical goals.
3. Democratic Processes: Information warfare can have a significant impact on democratic
processes, including elections. Manipulative tactics can influence voter behavior, and the
spread of misinformation can erode trust in democratic institutions.
4. Hybrid Warfare: Information warfare is often a component of hybrid warfare, which
combines conventional military tactics with non-military measures, including
disinformation campaigns. This blurring of boundaries complicates responses and
deterrence.
5. Global Reach: Information warfare can be conducted globally, allowing both state and
non-state actors to project influence far beyond their borders. This challenges traditional
notions of sovereignty.
6. Impact on Society: The proliferation of false or misleading information can have
profound social consequences, contributing to polarization, conspiracy theories, and
social unrest.
161
Persuasion and Public Opinion
Example of Information Warfare: Russian Disinformation Campaign
One prominent example of information warfare in the digital age is the Russian disinformation
campaign. This ongoing effort, often linked to the Russian government and intelligence
agencies, seeks to manipulate narratives and sow discord in target countries, particularly
Western democracies. Here's how it works:
Objectives: The Russian disinformation campaign aims to achieve several objectives,
including undermining trust in Western institutions, weakening democratic processes, and
amplifying divisions within target societies.
Tactics:
1. Use of Social Media: Russian actors leverage social media platforms like Facebook,
Twitter, and Instagram to disseminate misleading or false information. They create
fake accounts, groups, and pages to reach a wide audience.
2. Creation of Fake News: They produce and distribute fake news stories, often with
sensational or divisive content. These stories can be about political candidates, public
health issues, or sensitive societal topics.
3. Hacking and Leaking: Russian hackers have targeted political organizations and
institutions, stealing sensitive data and documents, which are later leaked to the public
or selectively disclosed to fuel controversy.
4. Troll Farms: Russia operates troll farms where individuals are paid to post
inflammatory and polarizing content online. These "trolls" engage with real users and
amplify divisive discussions.
5. Deepfake Technology: Use of deepfake technology to create convincing fake videos
and audio recordings can manipulate public perceptions and deceive audiences.
Types of Propaganda and Information Warfare Campaigns
Propaganda and information campaigns can take various forms, each designed to achieve
specific objectives. Here are some common types of propaganda and information campaigns:
White Propaganda: White propaganda is information that is presented truthfully and
factually, often by a credible source. It may not provide the complete picture but is generally not
deceptive. Governments and organizations often use white propaganda for public relations and to
shape public opinion.
Example: A government releases a report on its efforts to combat climate change, highlighting its
achievements and future plans. The information is presented accurately and transparently.
Black Propaganda: Black propaganda is information that is spread by a source that is not
openly identified or is falsely attributed to another source. It is deliberately deceptive and aims to
create confusion. It can be used by governments, intelligence agencies, or malicious actors to
discredit enemies or manipulate public opinion.
162
Persuasion and Public Opinion
Example: During a conflict, one country spreads false rumors that a rival nation is planning a
large-scale attack on neighboring countries. The source of these rumors is disguised, creating
confusion and fear.
Example: During 2020 U.S presidential elections, false claims about voter fraud and election
interference spread of social media. These claims were often made by anonymous accounts or by
accounts that had been created recently by Russia. The goal of these claims was to make people
believe that their vote wouldn't count, or that the election was already rigged.
Gray Propaganda: Gray propaganda falls between white and black propaganda. It is
information that is not entirely accurate but is not completely false either. It often blurs the lines
between truth and deception. Gray propaganda can be used by governments or organizations to
advance their agendas while maintaining a degree of plausible deniability.
Recent examples of gray propaganda can be seen in the use of social media accounts and
websites that purport to be grassroots movements or independent news sources but are, in fact,
controlled or influenced by a particular government or organization.
For instance, during various global events and political crises, some state-sponsored actors have
created seemingly independent social media accounts and websites that share news and
information with a particular slant or bias. These accounts may present themselves as concerned
citizens or activists while subtly promoting the interests of a government or entity.
In such cases, the intent is to manipulate public opinion by creating an appearance of organic
support for a particular viewpoint or policy, even though the true source of the content may be a
government or organization with a vested interest in shaping perceptions.
Disinformation: Disinformation involves spreading false information with the intent to
deceive, mislead, or manipulate the target audience. It is a deliberate act to create confusion or
harm. Disinformation campaigns are often conducted by state actors, political groups, or
malicious actors seeking to disrupt or influence.
A notable example of a disinformation campaign is the "Pizzagate" conspiracy theory that
emerged during the 2016 U.S. presidential election. This baseless conspiracy alleged that a
Washington, D.C. pizzeria was involved in a child sex trafficking ring led by high-profile
politicians from the Democratic Party.
The disinformation campaign began with anonymous online posts and spread rapidly through
social media platforms and fringe websites. Proponents of the conspiracy theory used
manipulated or fabricated evidence to support their claims, and the story gained traction among
some internet communities.
163
Persuasion and Public Opinion
Misinformation: Misinformation refers to the unintentional spread of false or inaccurate
information. It can occur due to errors, misunderstandings, or lack of fact-checking. While not
always malicious, misinformation can still have harmful consequences.
Counterpropaganda: Counterpropaganda efforts are aimed at countering or debunking false
or misleading information spread by adversaries. Governments and organizations may engage in
counterpropaganda to protect their reputation and provide accurate information to the public.
A notable example of a counterpropaganda campaign is the response to the spread of ISIS
(Islamic State) propaganda and recruitment efforts on social media platforms.
Several governments, as well as independent organizations and tech companies, initiated
counterpropaganda campaigns to counteract the extremist messaging of ISIS. These campaigns
aimed to undermine the appeal of ISIS propaganda and dissuade individuals from joining or
supporting the terrorist organization.
Purpose of Propaganda and Information Warfare
The goals of propaganda and information warfare can vary widely depending on the actors
involved and their motivations. However, there are several common objectives that are often
pursued in such campaigns:
1. Influence Public Opinion: One of the primary goals is to shape and manipulate public
perception, attitudes, and beliefs on specific issues, individuals, or ideologies. By
controlling the narrative, propagandists seek to gain public support or opposition for their
cause.
2. Create Fear and Uncertainty: Propaganda can be used to instill fear, confusion, or
uncertainty among target audiences. This may involve spreading disinformation or
exaggerating threats to create a climate of anxiety.
3. Mobilize Support: Propagandists aim to rally individuals or groups behind a particular
cause, leader, or ideology. This includes recruiting supporters, activists, or even soldiers
for a cause, such as terrorist groups or political movements.
4. Discredit Opponents: Propaganda campaigns often involve undermining the credibility
and reputation of adversaries, rivals, or competing ideologies. This can involve character
assassination, spreading rumors, or tarnishing reputations.
5. Promote Unity and Loyalty: Governments and organizations may use propaganda to
foster unity, loyalty, and patriotism among their populations, especially during times of
crisis or conflict.
6. Manipulate Behavior: Propagandists seek to influence the behavior of target audiences,
whether it's driving consumers to buy a product, voters to support a political candidate, or
individuals to join a movement.
7. Advance Political Agendas: Political actors use propaganda to gain electoral advantage,
discredit opponents, or push specific policy agendas. This includes framing issues in a
way that benefits their party or ideology.
164
Persuasion and Public Opinion
8. Weaken Adversaries: In international conflicts, states engage in information warfare to
weaken the morale and resolve of their adversaries. This can involve psychological
operations to demoralize enemy forces or populations.
9. Create Division and Discord: Some propagandists aim to sow division and discord
within societies or organizations. By exploiting existing fault lines, they can exacerbate
tensions and undermine social cohesion.
10. Censor or Control Information: Authoritarian regimes may employ propaganda to
suppress dissent, control the flow of information, and maintain political control over their
populations.
11. Shape International Perception: Countries engage in information warfare to shape how
they are perceived on the global stage. This includes managing their image, countering
negative narratives, and projecting power.
12. Economic Gain: Corporations and advertisers use propaganda to boost sales, enhance
brand loyalty, and maximize profits. Their goal is often to persuade consumers to
purchase their products or services.
Using Social Media for Malicious Persuasion
Disinformation Campaigns
The influence wielded in today's digital age extends far beyond casual activities like liking
Instagram photos or watching YouTube cooking shows. Influence can now be weaponized,
becoming a tool for manipulating narratives with significant national implications. Nation-state
actors worldwide recognize this power and actively employ seemingly harmless social
engagement platforms as part of their attack strategies.
One notable instance of influence attacks occurred during the 2016 US election. During these
attacks, adversaries from outside the United States aimed to exploit social media trends to shape
public opinion, undermine American interests, discredit various public and private entities, and
rapidly propagate domestic discord.
This shift signifies that cyber threat groups no longer need to focus solely on targeting military
assets, critical infrastructure, or well-defended targets. Instead, they can direct their efforts
toward a society's general population. Through this approach, they can exert precise influence
over the beliefs, thoughts, and even behaviors of specific target groups. The interconnected
nature of users on social media platforms amplifies their ability to disseminate disinformation
and fear, spreading them at the speed of a mere "like."
Numerous organizations have developed remarkable expertise in utilizing specialized tools and
techniques that harness the potential of social media and online networks for propagandistic
purposes. An illustrative and intriguing case demonstrating how precisely targeted social media
usage can be exploited by nation-state actors can be seen in the #DraftOurDaughters hashtag
trend during the 2016 presidential election.
165
Persuasion and Public Opinion
Users and groups affiliated with those directly opposing the Clinton for President campaign
collaborated to create authentic-looking tweets and visuals with the intention of manipulating the
narrative surrounding this matter.
The reality behind these posts is that none of them were ever officially endorsed, approved, or
associated with the actual Clinton campaign. Throughout her campaign, Hillary Clinton and her
team never supported or shared any of these memes or images on her verified Twitter, Instagram,
or other social media profiles. The critical turning point occurred when prominent supporters of
the Trump campaign started re-sharing and modifying these deceptive messages. In some cases,
hundreds of thousands of shares, likes, and reposts happened within minutes due to these
influential figures' posts and their significant followings. As a result, the hashtags gained
momentum and became a trending topic, influencing users across various social media platforms.
Influencing the Influencers
Individual tweets and social media posts have limited reach and cannot impact a significant
audience or influence any substantial action or outcome. To achieve virality and create the
impression that the message deserves more attention, it is essential to enlist an influencer to
promote the narrative. The primary objective of trolls or Twitter operations is to ultimately have
the message retweeted or shared by a prominent influencer with a substantial following. When
this happens, the message gains widespread visibility, and its credibility is enhanced
(Cunningham).
A real-life example of an influencer-driven disinformation campaign occurred during the 2016
United States presidential election. A group of individuals with ties to foreign actors wanted to
166
Persuasion and Public Opinion
sow discord and confusion among American voters. They created false narratives and misleading
content aimed at discrediting one of the presidential candidates.
Recognizing the need for a broad reach, they approached a well-known political influencer with
a significant following on social media platforms. This influencer agreed to amplify the
disinformation campaign's messages, sharing them with their hundreds of thousands of
followers.
As a result, the false narratives gained momentum, with many of the influencer's followers
believing and sharing the misleading content. The campaign achieved virality, leading to
increased public doubt and polarization surrounding the election.
In 2017, the US House Intelligence Committee made public a list of over 2,700 Twitter accounts
associated with the Intelligence Research Agency (IRA), a Russian intelligence-linked
organization. Among these accounts were numerous viral Twitter profiles that had specifically
targeted over 3,000 global news agencies and had been observed directly influencing more than
40 celebrities, each having millions of followers. These news outlets had, on various occasions,
unwittingly published articles that included embedded tweets originating from confirmed
Kremlin-linked troll accounts found in the aforementioned list. This occurred in over 11,000
articles during the course of the 2016 election (Cunningham 98).
One of the Russian-affiliated accounts that operated extensively during the 2016 election was the
Twitter account "@TEN_GOP." Despite impersonating the official Twitter account of the
Tennessee Republican Party, this handle managed to amass more than 130 million followers.
Even after Twitter administrators shut down and blocked this fraudulent account, its selfproclaimed "backup" account, "@10_GOP," still garnered over 40 million followers.
Remarkably, this account received retweets and shares from prominent figures including Donald
Trump Jr., Ann Coulter, and even President Trump (Cunningham 100).
Deep Fakes:
A recent example of black propaganda involves the use of deepfake videos during the 2020 U.S.
presidential election. Deepfake technology allows the creation of highly convincing fake videos
and audio recordings using artificial intelligence. In this case, malicious actors created deepfake
videos that appeared to show political candidates, including Joe Biden and Donald Trump,
making incriminating statements or engaging in unethical behavior.
The intention behind these deepfake videos was to spread disinformation, create confusion, and
influence public opinion in a way that favored one candidate over another. It illustrates how
technology can be used for black propaganda, undermining the trustworthiness of information
and contributing to a climate of distrust in the political sphere.
167
Persuasion and Public Opinion
Social media bots:
Social media bots or troll farms are automated accounts that are used to spread propaganda and
disinformation on social media. Social media bots can be used to amplify certain messages and
to create the impression that a particular view is more popular than it actually is.
Example: Internet Research Agency (IRA) - Russia: One of the most well-known troll farms is
the Internet Research Agency (IRA), based in Russia. The IRA gained international attention for
its efforts to interfere in foreign elections and manipulate public opinion through social media.
During the 2016 U.S. presidential election, the IRA ran a sophisticated influence campaign
aimed at sowing division and promoting specific political agendas. Some key aspects of their
activities included:
1. Fake Social Media Accounts: The IRA created numerous fake social media profiles that
impersonated Americans. These accounts posted divisive content on topics like race,
immigration, and gun control to exacerbate political polarization.
2. Political Memes and Content: They generated and shared a vast number of memes,
articles, and videos designed to support certain candidates, primarily Donald Trump, or to
disparage their opponents, such as Hillary Clinton.
3. Manipulating Social Media Trends: The IRA manipulated algorithms on platforms like
Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram to make their content more visible and engage a larger
audience.
Sponsored research:
Research that is funded by a company or organization with a vested interest in the outcome is a
form of gray propaganda. The research may be biased or misleading, but it can be presented as
objective and scientific.
Example: To build a stronger case for war in Iraq, the U.S. government sponsored intelligence
reports and research that purported to confirm the existence of weapons of mass destruction in
Iraq.
Example: The tobacco industry has a history of funding research studies that were widely
regarded as propaganda or information warfare to downplay the harmful effects of smoking and
cast doubt on the scientific consensus linking smoking to various health issues, including cancer
and heart disease.
Example: To protect their interests, the sugar industry, represented by the Sugar Association,
funded research aimed at shifting the blame for heart disease away from sugar and onto dietary
fat. They provided financial support to prominent nutrition researchers to conduct studies that
would exonerate sugar and downplay its role in heart disease.
168
Persuasion and Public Opinion
Fake news websites: Fake news websites are designed to look like real news websites, but
they publish false and misleading information. Fake news websites can be used to spread
propaganda without being detected.
Meme Warfare: Disseminating memes, images, or videos that convey political or ideological
messages in a humorous or easily shareable format. Memes, in this context, are humorous,
satirical, or visually compelling images, videos, or text snippets that are widely shared on social
media platforms. They are usually intended to convey a specific message, idea, or ideology in a
concise and engaging manner.
In meme warfare, various actors, including individuals, political groups, governments, or special
interest organizations, create and disseminate memes to achieve their objectives. These
objectives can range from swaying public opinion on political issues, discrediting opponents,
promoting conspiracy theories, or even inciting social or political unrest. Meme warfare has
become a significant component of modern information warfare, as it offers a low-cost, highimpact method for shaping public discourse and influencing political outcomes.
169
Persuasion and Public Opinion
References
Bettinghaus, E. P., & Cody, M. J. (1987). Persuasive communication (4th ed.). New York: Holt,
Rinehart &Winston.
Cialdini, R. B. (2007). Influence: The psychology of persuasion (Rev. ed.). New York: Quill.
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of
Communication, 43, 51–58.
du Pré, A. (2013). Communicating about health: Current issues and perspectives (4th ed.). New
York: Oxford University
Press
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of
Communication, 43(4), 51-58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
Fogg, B. J. (2008). Mass interpersonal persuasion: An early view of a new phenomenon. In H.
Oinas-Kukkonen, P. Hasle, M. Harjumaa, K. Segerståhl, & P. Øhrstrøm (Eds.), Proceedings of
the third international conference on persuasive technology (pp. 23–34). doi:10.1007/978-3-54068504-3
Gass, R. H., & Seiter, J. S. (2018). Persuasion: Social influence and compliance gaining (6th
ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
Greenfield, S. (2015). Mind change: How digital technologies are leaving their mark on our
brains. New York: Random House.
Hobbs, R. (2021). Mind Over Media: Propaganda Education for a Digital Age. W.W. Norton &
Company.
Kühne, R., & Schemer, C. (2015). The emotional effects of news frames on information
processing and opinion formation. Communication Research, 42, 387–407.
Jowett, G. S., & O’Donnell, V. (2019). Propaganda & persuasion (7th ed.). Thousand Oaks,
CA: Sage.
Doug Newsom, Judy Turk, and Dean Kruckeberg, This is PR, 11th ed. (Boston, MA:
Wadsworth, 2013).
Obama, B. (2012, July 24). Remarks at a campaign rally in Glen Allen, Virginia. [Transcript].
Retrieved from https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/remarks-campaign-rally-glen-allenvirginia
O’Keefe, D. J. (2016). Persuasion: Theory and research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
170
Persuasion and Public Opinion
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1996). Attitudes and persuasion: Classic and contemporary
approaches. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Perloff, R. M. (2013). The dynamics of persuasion: Communication and attitudes in the
21st century. New York: Routledge
Pratkanis, A. R., & Aronson, E. (1992). Age of propaganda: The everyday use and abuse of
persuasion. W.H. Freeman/Owl Books.
Public Relations Society of America (PRSA). (2018). What is public relations? Retrieved from
https://www.prsa.org/
Rice, R. E., & Atkin, C. K. (2009). Public communication campaigns: Theoretical principles
and practical applications. In J. Bryant & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in
theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 436–468). New York: Routledge.
Singer, P. W. (2018). LikeWar: the Weaponization of Social Media. HarperCollins.
Witte, K. (1992). Putting fear back into fear appeals: The extended parallel process model.
Communication Mono Graphs, 59, 329–349
Wodjynski, B. W. (2016). The deceptiveness of sponsored news articles: How readers recognize
and perceive native advertising. American Behavioral Scientist, 60(12), 1475–1491. doi:
10.1177/000276421666014
Wright, K. B., Sparks, L., & O’Hair, H. D. (2012). Health communication in the 21st century
(2nd ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
171