EFFECT OF PACKAGING AND DIFFERENT STORAGE CONDITIONS ON QUALITY Agaricus bisporus. Thesis Submitted to the Sri Guru Granth Sahib World University In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE In AGRI. - PLANT PATHOLOGY By Gurwinder Singh Roll No. - 19242102 Department of Agriculture Faculty of Agriculture Sri Guru Granth Sahib World University Fatehgarh Sahib-140407 2021 Title of the Thesis : Effect of Packaging and Different storage conditions on quality Agaricus bisporus. Name of Student Roll No. Major subject Minor subject Degree to be awarded Year of award of degree Name of the University Total no. of pages : : : : : : : : Gurwinder Singh 19242102 Agri. – Palnt pathology Physiology M.Sc. Agri. - Palnt pathology 2021 Sri Guru Granth Sahib World University, Fatehgarh Sahib ABSTRACT Mushrooms are edible Fungi and they have been broadly used as a source of food for centuries. Mushrooms are one of the most perishable commodities due to their high respiration and transpiration rate. This might be due to high metabolic activities that occur in the fruiting body of the mushroom. The present field experiment was conducted at the agriculture farm of Sri Guru Granth Sahib World University, Fatehgarh Sahib to evaluate the “Effect of Packaging and Different storage conditions on quality Agaricus bisporus”. Freshly harvested white button mushrooms were procured from the Mushroom Center. Mushrooms of uniform size and intact veil were selected, washed with tap water to remove dust, and surface dried. Two hundred gram (200g) mushrooms were taken for seven treatments and all the treatments were replicated three times. Samples were weighed and treated separately. The result revealed that loss in weight, minimum reduction in moisture, minimum veil opening, higher pH, reduction in the protein content, lower rate of browning, lowest off-odor, minimum water accumulation, and maximum acceptability was recorded in treatment T7, where samples treated with 0.5% KMS + 0.5% CaCl2 + 0.5% NaCl stored at 4 ˚C in polystyrene trays sealed with polyethylene film after 9 days of storage. The maturity index score ranged from 1 (completely intact veil) to 7 (cap open and gill surface flat). During storage, it was discovered that the mushroom samples matured faster at higher temperatures. It was seen that the mushrooms stored under control conditions (T1) had a maturity index score of 1 after 9 days of storage whereas mushrooms stored under T7 conditions had a score of 5. ਥੀਸਿਿ ਦਾ ਸਿਰਲੇ ਖ : ਸਿਸਦਆਰਥੀ ਦਾ ਨਾਮ : ਰੋਲ ਨੰਬਰ : ਪ੍ਰਮਖ ੁੱ ਸਿਸਾ : ਿਹਾਇਕ ਸਿਸਾ : ਸਦੁੱਤੀ ਜਾਣ ਿਾਲੀ ਸਿਗਰੀ : ਸਿਗਰੀ ਦੇ ਿਨਮਾਸਨਤ ਕਰਨ ਦਾ ਿਾਲ : ਯੂਨੀਿਰਸਿਟੀ ਦਾ ਨਾਮ : ਕਲ ੁੱ ਪ੍ੰਨੇ : ਿਾਰਅੰਸ CERTIFICATE-I This is to certify that this thesis entitled “Effect of Packaging and Different storage conditions on quality Agaricus bisporus.” submitted for the degree of Master of Science in the subject of Agri. - Plant pathology (Minor subject: Physiology) of the Sri Guru Granth Sahib World University, Fatehgarh Sahib is a bonafide research work carried out by Gurwinder Singh (19242102) under my supervision and that no part of this has been submitted for any other degree. The assistance and help received during the course of investigation have been fully acknowledged. Dr. Tajinder Kaur Major Advisor Asst. Professor Faculty of Agriculture Sri Guru Granth Sahib World University Fatehgarh Sahib-140407 CERTIFICATE-II This is to certify that this thesis entitled “Effect of Packaging and Different storage conditions on quality Agaricus bisporus.” submitted by Gurwinder Singh (19242102) to the Sri Guru Granth Sahib World University, Fatehgarh Sahib in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in the subject of Agri. - Plant pathology (Minor subject: Physiology) has been approved by student’s advisory committee along with Head and Dean Faculty of Agriculture after an oral examination of the same. HoD and Dean Faculty of Agriculture (Dr. J. S. Bal) Major Advisor Dr. Tajinder Kaur Dean Academic Affairs (Dr. S. S. Billing) External Examiner Acknowledgement First and foremost, I would like to thank the Almighty for this hand throughout my studies, by whose blessings I can carve another milestone in my life. My gratitude is much more than I am expressing here for my advisor. First and foremost, I would like to thank my most respected Guide, Dr. Tajinder Kaur, Assistant Professor of Agriculture, Sri Guru Granth Sahib World University, Fatehgarh Sahib, for her noble inspiration, praiseworthy guidance, valuable suggestions, and patience. I extend my profound sense of gratitude to Dr. Jaspreet Kaur (Assistant Professor) from the Department of Agriculture and members of my Advisory Committee, for their help, valuable guidance, critical appraisal of the manuscript, and encouragement throughout the investigation. I am extremely grateful to Dr. J. S. Bal, Head of the Department and Dean, Faculty of Agriculture for providing the necessary facilities to conduct my research work and offering words of encouragement. Mere words of acknowledgment will never convey my deep sense of appreciation of my father ------ and mother Mrs. ------ for their sacrifices, inspiring attitude, forbearance, and boundless affection without which I would never have been here. I cannot convey my feelings with words to my loving and caring friends ------- for their moral support, encouragement, and cheerful company who helped me in achieving my goal and making it a golden period of my life. I am thankful to the members of my laboratory for their timely help throughout my research. All may not have been mentioned but none is forgotten. Needless to say, errors and omissions, if any, are all mine. Date: Gurwinder Singh LIST OF TABLES S. no. Title Page no. 2.1 Nutritional composition of Agaricus bisporus 7 2.2 Mineral Content of of Agaricus bisporus 7 2.3 Dietary fibre and vitamin content of Agaricus bisporus 8 2.4 Comparison of mushroom with common vegetables per 100g of 8 article 2.5 Bioactive compounds of Agaricus bisporus and their mechanism 9-10 of action 3.1 Treatments used 3.2 Sensory Evaluation Scale 4.1 Influence of packaging and storage conditions on physiological 12 15-16 18 loss in weight (%) of white button mushroom 4.2 Influence of packaging and storage conditions on moisture 21 content (%) of white button mushroom 4.3 Influence of packaging and storage conditions on veil opening of 23 white button mushroom 4.4 Influence of packaging and storage conditions on pH of white 25 button mushroom 4.5 Influence of packaging and storage conditions on protein content 28 of white button mushroom 4.6 Browning index of white button mushroom 31 4.7 Maturity index of white button mushroom 34 4.8 off-odor in white button mushroom after storage 36 4.9 Water accumulation in white button mushroom after storage 39 4.10 Overall acceptability of white button mushroom after storage 41 LIST OF FIGURES S. no. Title Page no. 4.1 Influence of packaging and storage conditions on physiological 19 loss in weight (%) of white button mushroom 4.2 Influence of packaging and storage conditions on moisture 22 content (%) of white button mushroom 4.3 Influence of packaging and storage conditions on veil opening of 24 white button mushroom 4.4 Influence of packaging and storage conditions on pH of white 26 button mushroom 4.5 Standard BSA curve for protein content determination 27 4.6 Influence of packaging and storage conditions on protein content 29 of white button mushroom 4.7 Browning index of white button mushroom 32 4.8 Maturity index of white button mushroom 35 4.9 Off-odor in white button mushroom after storage 37 4.10 Water accummulation in white button mushroom after storage 40 CONTENTS Chapter no. I II III IV V Title INTRODUCTION REVIEW OF LITERATURE MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS AND DISCUSSION SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION REFERENCES VITA Page no. 1-3 4-11 12-16 17-41 CHAPTER - I INTRODUCTION Fungi is known as the second most diverse of all the groups. It has been considered as the main category of the other mega-diverse groups consisting of bacteria, nematodes, insects etc. (Goston 2000). The kingdom fungi consists of molds, yeasts, smuts and mushrooms (Khan and Chandra 2017). Mushrooms are huge category of macroscopic fungi having distinguishable fruiting bodies (Khan and Chandra 2017). Mushrooms are edible and they have been broadly used as a source of food for centuries. They are common ingredient in salads, soups, dishes etc. (Hag et al 2011). Their consumption has been increasing all over the world due to their delicate taste unique favor and nutrional value (Tao et al 2006). Mushrooms are a good source of all the essential amino acids, vitamins, (niacin, folates and B2), minerals (zinc, copper, phosphorus and potassium) fats and carbohydrates (Tao et al 2006; Haq et al 2011; Jiskani 2001). They are also good source of vitamins like biotin, riboflavin and thiamine (Chang and Buswell 1996). The fruiting body of mushrooms also consists of appreciable amount of dietary fibre which are helpful in regulating the physiological functions in humans (Manzi et al 2001). Certain kinds of bioactive compounds having anti-carcinogenic properties are also reported to be produced by mushrooms. Which help in increasing the immunity in humans (Nissan et al 2017). Presently, about 20 species of mushrooms are cultivated commercially all over the world but button Mushroom (Agaricus bisporus), oyster mushroom (Pleurotus spp.), shitake (Lentinula edodes), Black ear mushroom (Auricularia polytricha) and paddy straw mushroom (Volvariella volvacea) are produced significantly. Button mushroom contributes about 85% of the total mushroom production in India (R.D Rai & T.Arumuganathan). Post harvest technology of mushrooms). Its share in global food market is about 30% of total mushroom production in the world (Royse 2014) immature Agaricus bisporus has two colors, white and brown colored mushroom is known as brown cap mushroom or chestnut mushroom (Zhang et al 2018). Mushrooms are one of the most perishable commodity due to high respiration and transpiration rate. This might be due to high metabolic activities that occur in the fruiting body the mushroom (Sakinah et al 2020). They tend to lose quality right after harvest and have shelf life of about 1-3 days at ambient temperature (Singh et al 2010). They are very sensitive to humidity levels, as high water levels favour microbial growth and discoloration and conversely 1 low water levels lead to loss of weight (and thus economic value) and undesirable textural changes (Mahajan et al 2008). Agaricus bisporus is to physical vulnerable to physical and microbial damages as there is no such protective cuticle layer on the skin (Zang et al 2018). It was reported that shelf life of Agaricus bisporus at ambient temperature was (20-25˚C) upto 3-4 days (Jiang 2013), 5-7 days when stored at 0-2˚C or about 8 days when stored under refrigerated condition (Diamantopoulou & Philippoussis 2015; Jiang 2013:Xu, Tian, Ma, Liu and Zhang 2016). The short shelf life of mushroom is a disadvantage that limits its economic value. After harvest mushroom is continue to grow. During post harvest stage, mushrooms experience a series of quality degradation problems such as physical colour change, textural changes, moisture loss, off flavour, nutrition loss, tissue damage, microbial attack. This may be due to high metabolic rate in mushroom which eventually leads to senescence (Ding et al 2016; Gholami et al 2017). Mushroom browning has economic consequences and those varieties which develop discolouration lession as a result of storage or mishandling during picking are fudged to be of low quality and hence of low commercial value (Burton 1988). Browning or discolouration results from action of 0- diphenol oxidase (polyphenol oxidase, tyrosine) on phenolic compounds. The oxidized phenolics polymerise to form brown/black melanin pigments depending on the mushroom species (Rajarthnam et al 2003). There are several indicators that determine the quality of mushrooms such as whiteness, weight loss, microbial deterioration, respiration rate cap development, stip elongation etc (Singh et al 2010). Two most common post harvest practices and aspects of mushrooms are proper packaging and storage for the fresh mushrooms and processing for long term storage as well as value addition. Storage temperature is one of the main factor that affect post-ripening qualities such as respiration, transpiration, senescence and other physiological with this metabolism and bacterial activity engaged with the mushrooms (Dhalsamant et al 2015). Low temperature storage has been reported to be powerful tool to extend the storage life in many produces (Ali et al 2004, Sugar and Basile 2009). Low temperature reduces respiration and transpiration, delay senescence, prevents welting and shriveling and thus extend, shelf life of mushroom (Burton and Twyning 1989; Beit-Halachmy and Mannheim 1992) (Jamjumroon et al 2010) investigated post harvest changes of straw mushroom in different storage temperature. The result showed that 2 mushrooms kept at 4˚C comtained highest MDA content while highest protein content was observed at 15˚C. apart from the application of storage temperatures after harvest, packaging system also contribute highly in increasing the shelf life of fresh mushrooms. Effective packaging system would reduce the deteriotion rate and minimize their exposure to the undesirable environment during storage durations (Dhalsamant et al 2015). However high metabolic activities occur inside the packaging such as transpiration and respiration processes contribute water loss in the mushroom (Rux et al 2015; Azevedo et al 2017). Recently, packaging became a main useful tool in extending the post harvest mushroom. According to (Gholami et al 2017) packaging materials used could contribute to the successful impact in maintaining the quality of mushrooms. Polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and polyethylene (PE), vaccum packaging, film wrap, perforated packaging are some of the packaging materials used in mushroom packaging (Sakinah et al 2020). Post harvest approaches with suitable temperature and packaging systems excellentely maintain the quality attributes and extend the shelf life of mushrooms. Therefore, the present study was designed with following objectives: Effect of storage temperature on physiological & biochemical parameters of Agaricus bisporus. Effect of packaging. 3 CHAPTER - II REVIEW OF LITERATURE Fungi are giant group of 50,000 species. They comprise of mushrooms, toadstools, mould, mildew and yeast. A mushroom is fleshy, spore bearing fruiting body of a fungus. The most commonly cultivated mushroom species is Agaricus bisporus (lange) (Royse 1996). Agaricus may be suitable for eating or poisonous and unpalatable. Edible Agarics are usually known as mushrooms while toxic ones the toadstools. They are generally saprophytic and grow usually in lawns, pasture and gardens (Singh and Prasad 2019). Biology and taxonomy of Agarics campestris Systemic position: Kingdom Mycota Division Eumycota Sub-division Basidiomycotina Class Hymenomycota Sub-class Holobasidiomycetiae Order Agaricales Family Agaricaceae Genus Agaricus Species A. compestris (L.) Agaricus bisporus J. E. Lange Habit and Habitat Terrestrial saprophytic fungus is commonly found on rotting leaves, wood, manure, forest litter and meadow during the rainy season. Morphology The general morphology of Agaricus bisporus is shown in Figure 2.1. The somatic body of Agaricus consists of a stalked fruiting body and a fleshy cap at its apex known as pileus. Vegetative structure consists of a mass of thread-like underground hyphae known as mycelia. Mycelia are of two types, the primary and secondary mycelium. Primary mycelium is hyaline, monokaryotic and septate, while secondary mycelium is dikaryotic, dolipore septate, perennial and branched. The hyphal mycelia form root-like white hyphal cords called as rhizomorphs. 4 Rhizomorphs develops into fruiting bodies, basidiocarps generally known as mushrooms. Sporocarp or basidiocarp is the only above the ground part of the fungus which consists of a stem or stalk, known as stipe. The stalk holds a pileus or cap at the top. A number of radially arranged, plate-like gills containing spore-bearing basidia are present underside of the pileus. The developing gills are protected by a partial veil which later on forms a ring of tissue on the stipe known as annulus. Agaricus campestris is distinguished by their white cap, solid stature, non-staining surfaces and flesh, pink-then-brown gills. The spores are 6.5-8.5 µm long. Agaricus bisporus is distinguished by its long stem and tapering base, flesh white throughout, spores dark brown, ellipsoid, smooth, thick-walled and 4- sterigmata. Fig. 2.1: General Morphological structure of Agaricus Nutritional value of mushrooms Mushrooms have been known as essential food items since the ancient times because of their nutritional values and therapeutic properties. Auricularia auricularia was the first artificially cultivated mushroom in the world. The huge development in the mushroom cultivation came from France when Agaricus bisporus was cultivated for the first time in1600s and Pleurotus spp. in USA in 1900s (Chang, 2008). Nowadays, about thirty five species of mushroom have been cultivated commercially and about twenty one on an industrial scale (Muhammad and Suleiman, 2015). The global production of cultivated edible mushrooms was 5 495.127 metric tons in 1961 which increased to 10.378.163 metric tons in 2016 (FAO, 2016). China is leading producer of mushroom globally. It produces about 73% of world mushroom production in 2014. Italy is the second highest producer of mushrooms followed by USA (FAO, 2016). In recent years, significance of mushroom consumption in diet has been rising throughout the world due to their nutritional and medical properties. Mushrooms are generally low in calories with no starch and sugars and are known as diabetics delight. They contain high content of proteins and polysaccharides with low fat content. They are also excellent sources of phenolic compounds and some micro and macronutrients (Rodrigues et al 2015). The nutritional characteristics of edible mushrooms and the health promoting effects of the bioactive compounds present in mushrooms, makes them a health food (Pereira et al 2012). The nutritional composition and mineral content of Agaricus bisporus are described in Table 2.1 and 2.2. Many studies have confirmed the medicinal importance and nutritional quality of Agaricus bisporus . Ahlavat et al 2016 studied the proximate compositions in fruit bodies of Agaricus bisporus found that they are rich sources of carbohydrates (51.05%) and proteins (29.14%). Mushrooms are generally regarded as good source of proteins. The protein content of Agaricus bisporus reported by Sadiq et al 2008 is 11.01%, Muszynska et al 2011 is 25 % and by Mohiuddin et al 2015 is 17.7%. The mushrooms contain all the nine essential amino acids required by humans and can be used as substitute to meat diet (Kakon et al 2012). It is reported that their amino acid composition is similar to animal proteins (Guillamon et al 2010). Mushrooms are also reported as excellent source of minerals. They are generally rich source of potassium, iron, zinc, copper, sodium, selenium, cobalt and manganese (Owaid 2015). They are also considered as good source of vitamins. The most abundant vitamin reported in Agaricus is niacin which is followed by riboflavin. Other vitamins reported are vitamin B1, vitamin B3, L-ascorbic acid and α-tocopherol (Bernas and Jaworska, 2016). The vitamin content of Agaricus bisporus is given in Table 2.3. From nutritional aspect, mushrooms are rich source of proteins especially lysine and is rich food to fight against protein malnutrition in the cereal dependent Indian diet. They are rich in vitamins and minerals especially vitamin B-complex, vitamin B-12, folic acid and iron. Table 2.4 gives the comparison of mushroom with commonly consumed vegetables from nutritional point of view. 6 Table 2.1: Nutritional composition of Agaricus bisporus Mushroom Agaricus bisporus Portobello Agaricus bisporus Crimni Protein 34.44 33.48 Fat 3.10 2.39 Poly unsaturated fat 1.43 0.41 Total unsaturated fat 1.46 0.44 Saturated fat 0.30 0.26 Carbohydrate 47.38 46.17 Complex carbohydrate 24.68 24.27 Sugar (g/100g) 22.70 21.90 Calories 355 340 *R.D. Rai and T. Arumuganathan, Technical Bulletin, Post-harvest technology of Mushrooms published by National Research Centre for Mushroom (ICAR), Chambaghat, Solan (HP). Table 2.2: Mineral Content of of Agaricus bisporus Mushroom Agaricus bisporus Portobello Agaricus bisporus Crimni Calcium (mg 100 g-1) 23 9 Copper (mg 100 g-1) 4.33 20.80 Iron(mg 100 g-1) 2.1 4.8 Potassium(mg 100 g-1) 4500 4800 Sodium (mg 100 g-1) 52 3 Selenium (mg 100 g-1) 0.415 0.066 *R.D. Rai and T. Arumuganathan, Technical Bulletin, Post-harvest technology of Mushrooms published by National Research Centre for Mushroom (ICAR), Chambaghat, Solan (HP). 7 Table 2.3: Dietary fibre and vitamin content of Agaricus bisporus Mushroom Agaricus bisporus Portobello Agaricus bisporus Crimni Dietary fibre (g 100 g-1) 20.90 19.90 Thiamine B1 (mg 100 g-1) 0.27 0.23 Riboflavin B2 (mg 100 g-1) 4.13 3.49 Niacin B3 (mg 100 g-1) 69.20 38.50 Pantothenic acid B5 (mg 100 g-1) 12.70 21.70 Vitamin C(mg 100 g-1) 0 0 Vitamin D (IU 100 g-1) 235 26 *R.D. Rai and T. Arumuganathan, Technical Bulletin, Post-harvest technology of Mushrooms published by National Research Centre for Mushroom (ICAR), Chambaghat, Solan (HP). Table 2.4: Comparison of mushroom with common vegetables per 100g of article Protien(dry Name Calories Moisture Fat Carbohydrate(%) Mushroom 16 91.1 0.3 4.4 26.9 Beet root 42 87.6 0.1 9.6 12.9 Brinjal 24 92.7 0.2 5.5 15.1 Cabbage 24 92.4 0.2 5.3 18.4 Cauliflower 25 91.7 0.2 4.9 28.8 Celery 18 93.7 0.2 3.7 20.6 Green beans 35 88.9 0.2 7.7 21.6 Green peas 98 74.3 0.4 17.7 26.1 Lima beans 128 66.5 0.8 23.5 22.2 Potato 83 73.8 0.1 19.1 7.6 weight basis) *R.D. Rai and T. Arumuganathan, Technical Bulletin, Post-harvest technology of Mushrooms published by National Research Centre for Mushroom (ICAR), Chambaghat, Solan (HP). 8 Medicinal importance of Agaricus bisporus The extraction of bioactive compounds from mushrooms is gaining interest for developing functional foods. The bioactive compounds extracted from mushrooms act as antioxidants, anti-cancer and anti-inflammation agents. Their use is increasing in the world against several human diseases such as diabetes mellitus, coronary heart diseases, bacterial and fungal infections, disorders of the human immune system and cancers (Dhamodharan and Mirunalini, 2010). Several studies reported the antioxidant, antidiabetic and antibacterial properties of Agaricus bisporus (Ghahremani-Majd and Dashti, 2015; Mao et al 2013; Ndungutse et al 2015; Ozturk et al 2011). Sapcanin et al, 2015 evaluated the antioxidant activities of mushroom extracts and reported that they are excellent source of natural anti-oxidants and phenolic compounds. Thereby, they might serve as possible nutraceutical food in human diet and can play a great role in reducing the oxidative damage. Cheung et al 2013 found a positive co-relation between total phenolic content and anti-oxidant activities in the extracts from shitake mushroom and straw mushroom Volvariella volvacea. Probable immunoceuticals have been produced from more than 15 species of mushrooms having anti-cancer activities (Khan & Chandra, 2017). The major bioactive compounds extracted from Agaricus bisporus and their activities reported by different researchers are described in Table 2.5. Table 2.5: Bioactive compounds of Agaricus bisporus and their mechanism of action Property Active compound Mechanism of action References Induction of tumor ∝ −glucose necrosis factor Ren et al 2012. (TNF∝) production. Anticancer Delays tumor growth Arginine and metastasis. Noves et al 2011. Suppress aromatase Phytochemicals activity, inhibit Palomares et al breast-cancer cell 2011. proliferation, decrease 9 mammary tumor formation in vivo Unsaturated fatty Inhibit aromatase acids (linoleic acid activity and linolenic acid) Chen et al 2006 Lower cholesterol Lovastation level in serum and/or Chen et al 2012. liver. Antihyperlipidemic Reduce cholesterol Sterols (ergosta-7,22- absorption thereby dienol, ergosta-5,7- lower plasma dienol and ergosta-7- Teichmann et al 2007 cholesterol and LDL enol) cholesterol Reduced production Antidiabatic α-glucans of lipopoly saccharide Volman et al 2010. induced TNFa. Antioxidant Prevent progress of Seratonin Alzheimer’s disease. Muszynska et al 2011; Quchi et al 2009. Decreases feed efficiency, fat mass, adipocytokine secretion and ectopic Chistosan NPs. fat deposition in the liver and the muscle in diet induced obese mice 10 Neyrinck et al 2009. Effect of temperature and packaging on post harvest quality of mushrooms As mushrooms are rapidly perishable food, they start deteriorating immediately after the harvest. Senescence, water loss, microbial attack, and browning reduce its commercial value within 2-3 days of harvest (Nerya et al 2006). Mushrooms have a considerably greater respiration rate (200 to 500 mg/kg h at 20° C) than other vegetables and fruits, which is due to their thin and porous epidermal structure (Kim et al 2006). As a result, they cannot be stored at room temperature for longer than 24 hours and must be sold fresh. As a result, maintaining the acceptability of fresh mushrooms with various post-harvest procedures necessitates quality control during the post-harvest period. Browning, senescence, high respiration, water loss, and microbial attack all contribute to its short postharvest life of less than 3 days at room temperature (Ye et al 2012). Mushroom browning is a major biochemical event after harvest. It is one of the main features besides texture and cap opening considered in the‘qualityspectrum’defined by Gormley and Mac Canna.31. Browning or discolouration results from the action of 0-diphenol oxidase (polyphenol oxidase, tyrosinase) on phenolic compounds.10 the oxidized phenolics (quinones) polymerise to form brown/black melanin pigments depending on the mushroom species. Whiteness is the most important quality attribute in the button mushroom, besides, shape and size. In view of their highly perishable nature, the fresh mushrooms have to be processed to extend their shelf life for the off-season use. Mushrooms can be processed in many other ways to extend their shelf life such as drying, which is a comparatively low-cost method, pickling, and canning. After harvest, mushrooms continue to grow. Postharvest problems such as physical colour changes, tissue damages, decreasing turgidity, microbial attack, and flavourless happened due to the higher metabolic rate in mushroom which eventually leads to senescence (Gholami et al 2017). Storage temperature is one of the main factors that affect post-ripening and qualities such as respiration, transpiration, senescence and other physiological actions. Temperature fluctuation during storage is another key factor. 11 CHAPTER - III MATERIALS AND METHODS The present work entitled “Effect of Packaging and Different storage conditions on quality Agaricus bisporus” was conducted in the Department of Agriculture, Sri Guru Granth Sahib World University, Fatehgarh Sahib. The details of the experimental set-ups, material used and methodologies adopted during the course of investigation are described as under in this chapter. 3.1 Raw material procurement Freshly harvested white button mushroom were procured from the Mushroom Center, Umanshu mushroom farm near Rajpura, Punjab and transported to the Department of Agriculture, SGGSWU, Fatehgarh Sahib. They were sorted out for any damage or discoloration after harvesting and their stems were then chopped. The button mushroom was picked during the button stage. To avoid any physical damage and degeneration, the mushrooms were handled delicately and quickly. 3.2 Post-harvest treatment, Packaging and Storage conditions Mushrooms of uniform size and intact veil were selected, washed with tap water to remove dust and surface dried. Two hundred gram (200g) mushrooms were taken for each treatment and all the treatments were replicated three times. Samples were weighed and treated separately as shown in Table 3.1 Table 3.1: Treatments used Treatment T1 Description Control (without any treatment at ambient temperature) T2 0.5% KMS at ambient temperature T3 0.5% KMS at 4 ˚C T4 T5 T6 T7 0.5% KMS + 0.5% CaCl2 at ambient temperature 0.5% KMS + 0.5% CaCl2 at 4 ˚C 0.5% KMS + 0.5% CaCl2 + 0.5% NaCl at ambient temperature 0.5% KMS + 0.5% CaCl2 + 0.5% NaCl at 4 ˚C 12 After treatments the mushrooms were packed in standard packs of 200g with polystyrene trays at base sealed with polyethylene film. Mushroom samples were then stored under ambient and refrigerated (4 ͦC) conditions and were analyzed at 3 days intervals for 9 days for different quality and biochemical parameters. 3.3 Observation recorded 3.3.1 Quality Parameters Six mushrooms were chosen at random to evaluate the quality characteristics on day 0 (initial readings). The trays of mushrooms were selected at random after 3, 6 and 9 days of storage and all mushrooms in each tray were evaluated for the following characteristics. 3.3.1.1 Weight Loss The samples initial weight and final weight were recorded. The percentage of weight loss was computed using the following formula in relation to the initial weight (Ul Haq et al. 20211) 𝑊𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 𝑙𝑜𝑠𝑠 𝑏𝑦 𝑚𝑢𝑠ℎ𝑟𝑜𝑜𝑚 (%) = 𝐼𝑛𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑤𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑠𝑎𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒 − 𝐹𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑤𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑠𝑎𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒 × 100 𝐼𝑛𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑤𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑠𝑎𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒 3.3.1.2 Moisture Content The moisture content was estimated by drying the weighed sample (5 g) to a constant weight in hot air oven at 72° C. The dried samples were then cooled to room temperature prior to weighing (Ranganna, 2010). Loss in weight of sample after drying representing the moisture content was expressed as per cent (w/w). 𝑀𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑡 (%) = 𝑊𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑓𝑟𝑒𝑠ℎ 𝑠𝑎𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒 − 𝑊𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑑𝑟𝑖𝑒𝑑 𝑠𝑎𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒 × 100 𝑊𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑓𝑟𝑒𝑠ℎ 𝑠𝑎𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒 3.3.1.3 Veil opening The amount of veil opening of the undamaged button stage was calculated on the basis of cracked or broken on the mushroom’s volva. The percentage of veil opening was calculated by using the formula given by Dhalsamant et al 2015. 𝑃𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑣𝑒𝑖𝑙 𝑜𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑖𝑛𝑔 (%) = Where Vi = Total number of mushrooms (g) Vf = Number of veil opened (g) 13 𝑉𝑖 − 𝑉𝑓 × 100 𝑉𝑖 3.3.2 Biochemical characteristics 3.3.2.1 pH The mushroom sample was crushed with an equal quantity of distilled water and the pH was determined using digital pH meter (Ranganna, 2010). 3.3.2.2 Proteins The soluble protein concentration of the mushroom was determined by using the methodology given by Lowry et al. (1951) and using bovine serum albumin (BSA) as standard. Reagents used Reagent Concentration Reagent A 2% Na2Co3 solution in 0.1 N NaOH Reagent B 0.5% CuSO4.H2O in 1% Na-K tartrate Reagent C Folin-Ciocalteu’s Reagent-FCR Procedure One gm of fresh mushroom was crushed in 3 ml potassium phosphate buffer (50 mM, pH = 7.0) and centrifuged at 10000×g for 20 min at 4°C. Supernatant (0.1 ml) was added to test tube and 1 ml of distilled water was added. Now 5 ml of reagent C was poured to test tube and incubated at room temperature for 10 minutes. After this, 0.5 ml of Folin–Ciocalteu reagent was added to the test tube followed by incubation at room temperature in dark for 30 minutes. Absorbance was read at 660 nm using Systronics 2202 UV–Vis Spectrophotometer. Calibration curve was made by using Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA) and the total protein content was determined using standard curve. The protein content was expressed as mg g-1fr. wt. 3.3.3 Sensory Evaluation Preference ratings were done on experimental sample at different storage intervals for overall acceptability of the samples on the basis of following parameters: 1. Browning degree 2. Maturity index 3. off-odor 4. Water accumulation 5. Overall acceptability 14 Table 3.2: Sensory Evaluation Scale S. No 1 2 3 4 4 Parameters Browning index Maturity index Off-odor Water accumulation Overall acceptability Score Characteristics 1 75% brown 2 50% brown 3 30% brown 4 10% brown 5 Normal 7 Veil intact tightly 6 Veil intact stretched 5 Veil partially broken (less than half) 4 Veil partially broken (more than half) 3 Veil completely broken 2 Cap open and gills well exposed 1 Cap open and gill surface flat 5 No off odor 4 Very light 3 Light off-odor 2 Medium off-odor 1 Strong off-odor 0 Mushrooms completely wet 1 Mushrooms and film moderately wet 3 Mushrooms moderately wet 7 Mushrooms and film slightly wet 5 Mushrooms slightly wet 9 No water accumulation 1 Not acceptable 2 Poor 3 Fair 4 Good 5 Excellent 15 3.4 Statistical Analysis The mean ± S.E was calculated by MS Excel. The data was analyzed by one way ANOVA using SPSS software version 16. The ANOVA was carried out using a totally random design (CRD). Each experiment was performed in triplicates. 16 CHAPTER - IV RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The results of the study entitled “Effect of Packaging and Storage Conditions on Quality of Agaricus bisporus conducted at the Department of Agriculture, Sri Guru Granth Sahib World University, Fatehgarh Sahib during 2020-2021 are presented in this Chapter. The results presented in this chapter will be useful to develop an effective post-harvest method for increasing the shelf life of fresh white button mushroom. 4.1 Quality Parameters Some of the physical properties such as physiological weight loss and veil opening of white button mushroom were determined and are presented below: 4.1.1 Weight loss (%) The loss in weight during storage is one of the important parameters for considering freshness of material. Influence of different storage conditions and treatments on physiological loss in weight of button mushroom is presented in the Table 4.1 and Figure 4.1. The result revealed that loss in weight was observed in all the samples. Although, the minimum loss (4.33 %) was recorded in the samples treated with 0.5% KMS + 0.5% CaCl2 + 0.5% NaCl stored at 4 ˚C in polystyrene trays sealed with polyethylene film after 9 days of storage as compared to control which showed maximum loss in weight (24.33 %). Statistical analysis (one-way ANOVA) showed that significant difference was observed between control and all the treatments with respect to weight loss (%) at (p≤0.01). Our results are consistent with the findings of Ding et al. 2016 who also showed relatively lower loss in weight chemical-pretreated mushroom in comparison with the control after 8 days of storage. Similar results were obtained by Kumar et al (2013) who stated that the weight loss enhanced in mushrooms during storage. The reason for low weight loss in chemically pretreated mushroom might be due to their enhancing effects on the membrane integrity that could slow down the dehydration process (Maalwkuu et al. 2006; Aghdam and Mohammadkhani 2014). 17 Table 4.1: Influence of packaging and storage conditions on physiological loss in weight (%) of white button mushroom Treatment 3 DAYS 6 DAYS 9 DAYS Mean±S.E. Mean±S.E. Mean±S.E. T1 5.033±0.219 9.3±0.265 24.433±1.270 T2 3.3±0.153 7.167±0.203 11.7±0.760 T3 2.067±0.285 2.867±0.176 5.00±0.420 T4 2.433±0.12 3.233±0.088 11.20±0.350 T5 1.573±0.173 3.1±0.404 5.30±0.210 T6 2.133±0.088 5.133±0.176 9.933±0.190 T7 1.40±0.115 2.3±0.289 4.333±0.09 C.D. 0.54 0.757 1.856 SE(m) 0.176 0.247 0.606 SE(d) 0.249 0.35 0.857 C.V. 11.922 9.055 10.218 T1 = Control (without any treatment at ambient temperature); T2 = 0.5% KMS at ambient temperature; T3 = 0.5% KMS at 4 ˚C; T4 = 0.5% KMS + 0.5% CaCl2 at ambient temperature; T5 = 0.5% KMS + 0.5% CaCl2 at 4 ˚C; T6 = 0.5% KMS + 0.5% CaCl2 + 0.5% NaCl at ambient temperature; T7 = 0.5% KMS + 0.5% CaCl2 + 0.5% NaCl at 4 ˚C 18 30 3 DAYS WEIGHT LOSS (%) 25 6 DAYS 9 DAYS 20 15 10 5 0 T1 T2 T3 T4 TREATMENT T5 T6 T7 Fig. 4.1: Influence of packaging and storage conditions on physiological loss in weight (%) of white button mushroom 19 4.2 Moisture Content The data presented in Table 4.2 and Figure 4.2 show the effect of different storage conditions on the per cent moisture content of white button mushroom stored for 3, 6 and 9 days in polystyrene trays sealed with polyethylene film at ambient and refrigerated temperature. A significant decrease in moisture content was observed after storage. The maximum decrease in moisture content was recorded in T1 (without any treatment at ambient temperature) which was about 28.33% i.e. from 90.67 to 62.33% after 9 days of storage in control; followed by T2 (0.5% KMS at ambient temperature; 21.33 %) and T6 (0.5% KMS + 0.5% CaCl2 + 0.5% NaCl at ambient temperature), irrespective of the storage conditions. The minimum reduction in moisture content was recorded in T7 (0.5% KMS + 0.5% CaCl2 + 0.5% NaCl at 4 ˚C; 16.67%). This agreed with the findings of Singh et al. 2016 who observed decrease in moisture content with the advancement of storage period in all the packaging materials irrespective of the storage conditions at which they were kept. This could be attributed to the fact that mushrooms have a thin and porous epidermal structure, which is prone to quick superficial dehydration that causes significant quality losses (Singer, 1986). Antmann et al. 2008 reported that unpacked mushrooms show a weight loss of 72 % after 6 days of storage, suggesting that dehydration is a major factor for loss in mushroom quality during storage. The mushrooms stored at refrigerated conditions were better preserved than at ambient conditions, which was in accordance with Babitha and Kiranmayi (2010) who reported that tomatoes stored at refrigerated temperature had significantly higher moisture content than at ambient conditions. 20 Table 4.2: Influence of packaging and storage conditions on moisture content (%) of white button mushroom Treatment Initial moisture content 3 DAYS 6 DAYS 9 DAYS Mean± S.E. Mean± S.E. Mean± S.E. Mean± S.E. 1 90.667±0.667 84.333±0.333 71.667±0.882 62.333±1.453 2 90.333±0.882 88±0.577 78±1.155 69±0.577 3 90.667±1.202 89.333±0.333 83.667±0.882 73.667±0.882 4 90.333±0.333 85.667±0.334 77.333±0.667 72.667±1.453 5 91±0.577 89.667±0.334 78.667±0.667 74±1.155 6 89.333±0.333 83.667±0.882 75.333±0.667 71.333±0.667 7 90.667±0.667 88.667±0.334 78±0.577 74±0.577 C.D. N/A 1.494 2.471 3.319 SE(m) 0.724 0.488 0.807 1.084 SE(d) 1.024 0.69 1.141 1.533 C.V. 1.386 0.971 1.802 2.64 T1 = Control (without any treatment at ambient temperature); T2 = 0.5% KMS at ambient temperature; T3 = 0.5% KMS at 4 ˚C; T4 = 0.5% KMS + 0.5% CaCl2 at ambient temperature; T5 = 0.5% KMS + 0.5% CaCl2 at 4 ˚C; T6 = 0.5% KMS + 0.5% CaCl2 + 0.5% NaCl at ambient temperature; T7 = 0.5% KMS + 0.5% CaCl2 + 0.5% NaCl at 4 ˚C 21 0 DAY 3 DAYS 6 DAYS 9 DAYS MOISTURE CONTENT (%) 100 80 60 40 20 0 T1 T2 T3 T4 TREATMENT T5 T6 T7 Fig. 4.2: Influence of packaging and storage conditions on moisture content (%) of white button mushroom 22 4.3 Veil Opening Table 4.3 and Figure 4.3 shows the results of influence of packaging and storage conditions on veil opening of white button mushroom. Agaricus bisporus stored at ambient temperature showed significantly higher percentage of veil opening as compared to mushrooms stored at refrigerated temperature (4 ºC) irrespective of the type of post harvest treatment. There was a rapid increase in veil opening from day 0 to 9 i.e. about 83 % in T1 (Control; without any treatment at ambient temperature). The minimum veil opening was observed in T7 (0.5% KMS + 0.5% CaCl2 + 0.5% NaCl at 4 ˚C) i.e. 10% after 9 days of storage. Opening of veil may be due to dryness from water loss which results in decrease cohesive forces and hydrophilic molecules such as protein, responsible for the intact condition of the mushroom veil (Alikhani-Koupaei et al. 2014). In addition to that, lower temperature gives drying effect to commodities. Also, the mushrooms continue to grow even after harvest. Thus, these factors triggered the opening of veil towards the mature stage (Sakinah et al. 2020). Table 4.3: Influence of packaging and storage conditions on veil opening of white button mushroom Treatment 3 DAYS 6 DAYS 9 DAYS Mean± S.E. Mean± S.E. Mean± S.E. 1 53.333±3.333 73.333±3.333 83.333±3.333 2 56.667±3.333 70±0 76.667±3.333 3 6.667±3.333 23.333±3.333 23.333±3.333 4 46.667±3.333 70±5.774 63.333±3.333 5 3.333±3.333 16.667±3.333 13.333±3.333 6 43.333±3.333 63.333±3.333 56.667±3.333 7 3.333±3.333 13.333±3.333 10±0 C.D. 10.209 10.913 9.451 SE(m) 3.333 3.563 3.086 SE(d) 4.714 5.04 4.364 C.V. 18.944 13.092 11.454 T1 = Control (without any treatment at ambient temperature); T2 = 0.5% KMS at ambient temperature; T3 = 0.5% KMS at 4 ˚C; T4 = 0.5% KMS + 0.5% CaCl2 at ambient temperature; T5 = 0.5% KMS + 0.5% CaCl2 at 4 ˚C; T6 = 0.5% KMS + 0.5% CaCl2 + 0.5% NaCl at ambient temperature; T7 = 0.5% KMS + 0.5% CaCl2 + 0.5% NaCl at 4 ˚C 23 100 3 DAYS 6 DAYS 9 DAYS VEIL OPENING (%) 80 60 40 20 0 T1 T2 T3 T4 TREATMENT T5 T6 T7 Fig. 4.3: Influence of packaging and storage conditions on veil opening of white button mushroom 24 4.4 pH The average pH value recorded in fresh mushroom was 6.80 ± 0.03. Table 4.4 and Figure 4.4 shows the results of influence of packaging and storage conditions on pH of white button mushroom A non-significant difference in pH was observed in mushrooms stored under different conditions. The pH value was recorded to be higher in T7 (0.5% KMS + 0.5% CaCl2 + 0.5% NaCl at 4 ˚C) with the mean value of 7.13 while lowest pH was observed in mushroom without washing i.e.T1 (Control; without any treatment at ambient temperature) after 3 days of storage. Babarinde and Fabunmi (2009) also reported increase in pH of okra stored in polyethylene bag for 3 days, which implies that okra turn less acidic with increase in storage period. Table 4.4: Influence of packaging and storage conditions on pH of white button mushroom Treatment 3 DAYS 6 DAYS 9 DAYS Mean± S.E. Mean± S.E. Mean± S.E. 1 6.9±0.029 7.027±0.037 6.967±0.067 2 7.033±0.033 7.067±0.033 7.067±0.033 3 6.95±0.029 6.983±0.06 7.033±0.12 4 7.033±0.088 7.167±0.033 7.093±0.064 5 7.067±0.088 6.933±0.088 6.933±0.088 6 6.96±0.087 7.067±0.088 6.967±0.088 7 7.133±0.033 7±0.1 7.033±0.12 C.D. N/A N/A N/A SE(m) 0.062 0.068 0.088 SE(d) 0.088 0.097 0.124 C.V. 1.536 1.684 2.17 T1 = Control (without any treatment at ambient temperature); T2 = 0.5% KMS at ambient temperature; T3 = 0.5% KMS at 4 ˚C; T4 = 0.5% KMS + 0.5% CaCl2 at ambient temperature; T5 = 0.5% KMS + 0.5% CaCl2 at 4 ˚C; T6 = 0.5% KMS + 0.5% CaCl2 + 0.5% NaCl at ambient temperature; T7 = 0.5% KMS + 0.5% CaCl2 + 0.5% NaCl at 4 ˚C 25 3 DAYS 6 DAYS 9 DAYS 7,3 7,2 pH 7,1 7 6,9 6,8 6,7 6,6 T1 T2 T3 T4 TREATMENT T5 T6 T7 Fig. 4.4: Influence of packaging and storage conditions on pH of white button mushroom 26 4.5 Total Proteins The influence of different post harvest treatment on the protein content of white button mushroom during storage period is presented in Table 4.5 and Figure 4.6. The total protein content was calculated from standard BSA curve and expressed as mg/100 g fresh weight (Figure 4.5). The initial protein content of fresh mushroom was 9.85±1.96 mg/100g FW. From the Table, it was observed that even though there was a gradual reduction in the protein content in all the treatments, the rate of decrease was less in treatment T7 (0.5% KMS + 0.5% CaCl2 + 0.5% NaCl at 4 ˚C) followed by T5 (0.5% KMS + 0.5% CaCl2 at 4 ˚C) and T3 (0.5% KMS at 4 ˚C) after 9 days of storage in refrigerated temperature compared to control and ambient temperature. The protein content of white button was found to be more in mushroom samples in samples treated with different post harvest chemicals and stored in refrigerated conditions in polystyrene trays covered with polyethylene film as compared to control (T1; without any treatment and packaging) stored at ambient temperature. 2,5 ABSORBANCE 2 1,5 y = 0,1569x + 0,3806 R² = 0,9837 1 0,5 0 0 2 4 6 8 CONCENTRATION (mg/ml) 10 Fig. 4.5: Standard BSA curve for protein content determination 27 12 Table 4.5: Influence of packaging and storage conditions on protein content of white button mushroom Treatments 3 DAYS 6 DAYS 9 DAYS T1 6.257±1.66 2.231±0.181 1.715±0.156 T2 5.307±0.224 3.406±118 2.522±0.222 T3 8.567±3.130 5.074±0.160 4.925±0.195 T4 6.115±0.169 3.145±0.094 2.586±0.035 T5 8.687±0.083 4.245±0.195 4.415±0.321 T6 7.113±0.178 3.204±0.224 2.482±1.01 T7 8.237±1.84 6.008±0.478 5.074±0.160 T1 = Control (without any treatment at ambient temperature); T2 = 0.5% KMS at ambient temperature; T3 = 0.5% KMS at 4 ˚C; T4 = 0.5% KMS + 0.5% CaCl2 at ambient temperature; T5 = 0.5% KMS + 0.5% CaCl2 at 4 ˚C; T6 = 0.5% KMS + 0.5% CaCl2 + 0.5% NaCl at ambient temperature; T7 = 0.5% KMS + 0.5% CaCl2 + 0.5% NaCl at 4 ˚C 28 3 DAYS 6 DAYS 9 DAYS PROTEIN CONTENT (mg/g FW) 14,000 12,000 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000 0,000 T1 T2 T3 T4 TREATMENT T5 T6 T7 Figure 4.6: Influence of packaging and storage conditions on protein content of white button mushroom 29 4.6 Sensory Evaluation 4.6.1 Browning Index Browning, the most essential indicator of quality as perceived by consumers, plays a critical influence in the acceptance or rejection of mushrooms. The browning index score assesses the acceptability of mushrooms based on browning as seen through the eyes of a consumer. It was discovered that the browning of all mushroom samples increased as the storage period increased (Table 4.6 and Figure 4.7). The browning index score ranged from 5 (no appearance of brown color) to 1 (no appearance of brown color) (dark in more than 10 pieces). Browning occurred at a faster rate in samples held at room temperature than in samples stored at 4 C, regardless of the kind of treatment. There was little browning in the samples kept at 4 ̊C ninth day of storage, whereas browning increased significantly at third day of storage for samples stored under ambient conditions. Hence, higher temperature conditions facilitated more production of compounds which are responsible for browning. Further it was observed that the samples stored under T7 conditions (0.5% KMS + 0.5% CaCl2 + 0.5% NaCl at 4 ˚C) had lower rate of browning as compared to other treatments. Analysis of variance showed statistically significant decrease in browning index in treated mushroom samples as compared to control (without any treatment and packaging). After harvest, mushrooms are highly perishable and prone to enzymatic browning (Kumar et al 2013; Kumari and Baskaran, 2015). Browning pigments emerge when O2 reacts with an enzyme found in mushrooms (Kumari and Baskaran, 2015). Furthermore, the browning impact was aided by the phenolic substrate oxidation process triggered by the PPO enzyme (Alikhani Koupaei et al 2014). This suggests that while the fruiting body was stored in control packaging, there was a significant concentration of O2 and PPO enzyme. The permeability barrier of packing films might have reduced O2 depletion in enclosed packaging (Sakinah et al 2020). The browning of mushrooms might also be caused by the action of bacteria and mould on the mushroom tissues. The low temperature, post harvest treatment and packing of mushrooms might have delayed or inhibited the infection of mushrooms. 30 Table 4.6: Browning index of white button mushroom Treatment 3 DAYS 6 DAYS 9 DAYS Mean± S.E. Mean± S.E. Mean± S.E. 1 1.667±0.333 1±0 1±0 2 2.667±0.333 2±0 2±0 3 4.667±0.333 4±0 3.667±0.333 4 3.333±0.333 3±0 2.333±0.333 5 5±0 4±0 3.667±0.333 6 4±0 3.333±0.333 3±0 7 5±0 4±0 4±0 C.D. 0.772 0.386 0.668 SE(m) 0.252 0.126 0.218 SE(d) 0.356 0.178 0.309 C.V. 11.601 7.16 13.453 T1 = Control (without any treatment at ambient temperature); T2 = 0.5% KMS at ambient temperature; T3 = 0.5% KMS at 4 ˚C; T4 = 0.5% KMS + 0.5% CaCl2 at ambient temperature; T5 = 0.5% KMS + 0.5% CaCl2 at 4 ˚C; T6 = 0.5% KMS + 0.5% CaCl2 + 0.5% NaCl at ambient temperature; T7 = 0.5% KMS + 0.5% CaCl2 + 0.5% NaCl at 4 ˚C 31 3 DAYS 6 DAYS 9 DAYS 6 BROWNING DEGREE 5 4 3 2 1 0 T1 T2 T3 T4 TREATMENT T5 T6 Fig. 4.7: Browning index of white button mushroom 32 T7 4.6.2 Maturity index The maturity of mushrooms is a key element in determining their shelf life. Increased maturity results in veil breaking and, as a result, increased senescence. The maturity of the mushrooms increased as the storage period increased, as shown in Table 4.7 and Figure 4.8. The maturity index score ranged from 1 (completely intact veil) to 7 (cap open and gill surface flat). During storage, it was discovered that the mushroom samples matured faster at higher temperatures. It was seen that the mushrooms stored under control conditions (T1) had a maturity index score of 1 after 9 days of storage whereas mushrooms stored under T7 conditions had a score of 5. Mushroom maturity is favored by higher temperature which may be due to high percentage of soluble carbohydrates, mainly manitol, which serves as a respiratory substrate resulting in continued development and aging (Briones et al. 1992; Escriche et al. 2001). The opening of the mushroom cap is also related to the dryness of the mushrooms as a result of water loss during storage. Increased water loss during storage reduces the cohesive forces of water and other hydrophilic molecules, such as proteins necessary for the intact position of mushrooms' caps and veil (Jiang 2013; Wani et al. 2009). 4.6.3 Off-odor The off-odor development increased in all the treatments as shown in Table 4.8 and Figure 4.9). However, very strong off-odor developed in the treatments stored under ambient conditions. The off-odor developed in T1 (control) was very high as compared to other treatments. The lowest off-odor was developed in T7 treated with 0.5% KMS + 0.5% CaCl2 + 0.5% NaCl and stored at 4 ˚C in polystyrene strays with polyethylene film after nine days of storage. Towards the end of the storage period, the appearance of off-odor was comparatively less at lower temperatures of storage i.e. 4⁰C as compared to ambient conditions. Statistical analysis revealed significant difference in off-odor between control and other treatments at p<0.05. 33 Table 4.7: Maturity index of white button mushroom Treatment 3 DAYS 6 DAYS 9 DAYS Mean± S.E. Mean± S.E. Mean± S.E. 1 4.333±0.333 3.333±0.333 1±0 2 6±0 4±0 1.667±0.333 3 7±0 6±0 5.667±0.333 4 6±0 4.667±0.333 2.667±0.333 5 7±0 6.333±0.333 6±0 6 6.333±0.333 4.667±0.333 2.667±0.333 7 7±0 6±0 5±0 C.D. 0.546 0.772 0.772 SE(m) 0.178 0.252 0.252 SE(d) 0.252 0.356 0.356 C.V. 4.947 8.729 12.385 T1 = Control (without any treatment at ambient temperature); T2 = 0.5% KMS at ambient temperature; T3 = 0.5% KMS at 4 ˚C; T4 = 0.5% KMS + 0.5% CaCl2 at ambient temperature; T5 = 0.5% KMS + 0.5% CaCl2 at 4 ˚C; T6 = 0.5% KMS + 0.5% CaCl2 + 0.5% NaCl at ambient temperature; T7 = 0.5% KMS + 0.5% CaCl2 + 0.5% NaCl at 4 ˚C 34 3 DAYS 6 DAYS 9 DAYS 8 MATURITY INDEX 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 T1 T2 T3 T4 TREATMENT T5 T6 Fig. 4.8: Maturity index of white button mushroom 35 T7 Table 4.8: off-odor in white button mushroom after storage Treatment 3 DAYS 6 DAYS 9 DAYS Mean± S.E. Mean± S.E. Mean± S.E. 1 2.667±0.333 2±0 1±0 2 4±0 2.667±0.333 2±0 3 5±0 4±0 3.667±0.333 4 3.667±0.333 3.333±0.333 3±0 5 5±0 4.333±0.333 4±0 6 4±0 3.667±0.333 3.333±0.333 7 5±0 4±0 4±0 C.D. 0.546 0.772 0.546 SE(m) 0.178 0.252 0.178 SE(d) 0.252 0.356 0.252 C.V. 7.364 12.729 10.287 T1 = Control (without any treatment at ambient temperature); T2 = 0.5% KMS at ambient temperature; T3 = 0.5% KMS at 4 ˚C; T4 = 0.5% KMS + 0.5% CaCl2 at ambient temperature; T5 = 0.5% KMS + 0.5% CaCl2 at 4 ˚C; T6 = 0.5% KMS + 0.5% CaCl2 + 0.5% NaCl at ambient temperature; T7 = 0.5% KMS + 0.5% CaCl2 + 0.5% NaCl at 4 ˚C 36 3 DAYS 6 DAYS 9 DAYS 6 OFF-ODOR 5 4 3 2 1 0 T1 T2 T3 T4 TRETAMENT T5 T6 Fig. 4.9: Off-odor in white button mushroom after storage 37 T7 4.6.4 Water accumulation Water accumulation is one of the most common causes of mushroom deterioration. Mushrooms, due to their high transpiration rate, suffer from moisture loss, which causes a variety of physiological changes, including weight loss and maturation. The data presented in Table 4.9 and Figure 4.10 depicted that with increase in storage time, loss of moisture from the mushrooms takes place. It was discovered that the higher the temperature, the greater the moisture loss. The moisture emitted by the mushrooms builds up on the film's surface. This is because the films have a low water vapor transmission rate. Due to the limited passage of moisture from inside the container, moisture gathers inside, on the films, and on the mushroom samples. More water accumulation was seen in the packages stored at ambient temperature due to the high temperature settings. The results showed that maximum water accumulation was seen in T1 (control) without any treatment at ambient conditions after nine days of storage, followed by T4 and T6 treated with 0.5% KMS + 0.5% CaCl2 and 0.5% KMS + 0.5% CaCl2 + 0.5% NaCl and stored at ambient conditions. However minimum water accumulation was seen in mushroom samples of T7 treated with 0.5% KMS + 0.5% CaCl2 + 0.5% NaCl and stored at 4 ˚C. 4.7.5 Overall acceptability Overall acceptability of mushrooms stored at different temperatures in different packages decreased towards the end of storage period (Table 4.10). The early values, which represent highest acceptability, decline to least acceptability near the end of the storage time. It was also discovered that even little alterations in visual appearance, scent, and overall quality reduced desirability significantly. The changes were delayed in the samples held at low temperatures, whereas the ones stored at higher temperatures were found to have a quick fall in acceptability. It was seen that maximum acceptability was seen for mushroom samples in T7 treated with 0.5% KMS + 0.5% CaCl2 + 0.5% NaCl and stored at 4 ˚C. Minimum acceptability was seen in the mushrooms stored in at room temperature without any treatment. 38 Table 4.9: Water accumulation in white button mushroom after storage Treatment 3 DAYS 6 DAYS 9 DAYS Mean± S.E. Mean± S.E. Mean± S.E. 1 4±0.667 3±0 1±0 2 6±0.667 5±1.155 3±0 3 6±0.667 6±0.667 6±0.667 4 5±0 6±0.667 2±0.667 5 6±1.333 6±0.667 6±0.667 6 6±0.667 6±1.333 4±1.333 7 9±0 5±0 6±0.667 C.D. 2.183 N/A 2.183 SE(m) 0.713 0.797 0.713 SE(d) 1.008 1.127 1.008 C.V. 20.095 26.59 30.498 T1 = Control (without any treatment at ambient temperature); T2 = 0.5% KMS at ambient temperature; T3 = 0.5% KMS at 4 ˚C; T4 = 0.5% KMS + 0.5% CaCl2 at ambient temperature; T5 = 0.5% KMS + 0.5% CaCl2 at 4 ˚C; T6 = 0.5% KMS + 0.5% CaCl2 + 0.5% NaCl at ambient temperature; T7 = 0.5% KMS + 0.5% CaCl2 + 0.5% NaCl at 4 ˚C 39 10 3 DAYS WATER ACCUMULATION 9 6 DAYS 9 DAYS 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 T1 T2 T3 T4 TREATMENT T5 T6 Fig. 4.10: Water accumulation in white button mushroom after storage 40 T7 Table 4.10: Overall acceptability of white button mushroom after storage Treatment 3 DAYS 6 DAYS 9 DAYS T1 4 2 1 T2 4 3 2 T3 5 4 3 T4 4 3 2 T5 5 4 4 T6 4 3 3 T7 5 5 4 1=Not acceptable; 2= Poor; 3= Fair; 4= Good ; 5= Excellent 41 CHAPTER – V SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION 42 REFERRENCE Aghdam M S, Mohammadkhani N (2014). Enhancement of chilling stress tolerance of tomato fruit by postharvest brassinolide treatment. Food and Bioprocess Technology 7(3): 90914. Ali M, Chin L H and Marimuthu M L (2004). Low temperature storage and modified atmosphere packaging of carambola fruit and their effects on ripening related texture changes, wall modification and chilling injury symptoms. Postharvest Biology and Technology 33:181-192. Alikhani-Koupaei, M Mazlumzadeh, M Sharifani, M. and Adibian, M. (2014). Enhancing stability of essential oils by microencapsulation for preservation of button mushroom during postharvest. Journal of Food Science Nutrient, 2(5): 526–533. https:// doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.129. Antmann G, Ares G, Lema P, Lareo C (2008). Influence of modified atmosphere packaging on sensory quality of shiitake mushrooms. Postharvest biology and technology 1;49(1): 16470. Babarinde, G O and Fabunmi, O A (2009). Effects of packaging materials and storage temperature on quality of fresh okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) fruit. Agricultura Tropica Et Subtropica 42(4): 151-156. Babitha B and Kiranmayi P (2010): Effect of storage conditions on the post harvest quality of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum). Research Journal of Agricultural Sciences 1(4): 409411. Beit-Halachmy I and Mannheim C H (1992). Is modified atmosphere packaging beneficial for fresh mushroom. Wiss. U. Technol. 34: 426-432. Bernaś E, Jaworska G (2016). Vitamins profile as an indicator of the quality of frozen Agaricus bisporus mushrooms. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis. 1;49:1-8. Briones G L, Varoquaux P, Chambroy Y, Bouquant J, Bureau G and Pascat B (1992) Storage of common mushrooms under controlled atmospheres. International Journal of Food Science and Technology 27: 493-505. Burton K S. (1988). The effects of storage and development of Agaricus bisporus proteases. The Journal of Horticultural Science 63: 255-260. Chang S.T J.A. Buswell. (1996). Mushroom Nutriceuticals. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 12: 473-476. Chang S T, Buswell JA (2008). Development of the world mushroom industry: Applied mushroom biology and international mushroom organizations. International Journal of Medicinal Mushrooms 10(3). Dhalsamant K, Dash S K, Bal L M and Panda M K (2015). Effect of perforation mediated MAP on shelf life of mushroom. Scientia Horticulturae 189: 41-50. Dhamodharan G, Mirunalini S (2010). A novel Medicinal Characterization of Agaricus bisporus (white button mushroom). Pharmacol Online 2:456-63. 43 Diamantopoulou, P & Philippoussis, A. (2015). Cultivated mushrooms: Preservation and processing. Handbook of vegetable preservation and processing. Florida: CRC press 495– 525. Ding Y, Zhu Z, Zhao J, Nie Y, Zhang Y, Sheng J, Meng D, Mao H, Tang X (2016). Effects of postharvest brassinolide treatment on the metabolism of white button mushroom (Agaricus bisporus) in relation to development of browning during storage. Food and Bioprocess Technology 9(8): 1327-34. Ding, Y Zhu, Z Zhao, J Nie, Y Zhang, Y Sheng, J Tang, X. (2016). Effects of postharvest brassinolide treatment on the metabolism of white button mushroom (Agaricus bisporus) in relation to development of browning during storage. Food and Bioprocess Technology, 1–8 EscricheI, Serra J A, Gomez M and Galotto M J (2001) Effect of ozone treatment and storage temperature on physicochemical properties of mushrooms (Agaricus bisporus). Food Sci Technol Int7: 251-58 Ghahremani-Majd H, Dashti F (2015). Chemical composition and antioxidant properties of cultivated button mushrooms (Agaricus bisporus). Horticulture, Environment, and Biotechnology 56(3): 376-82. Gholami et al (2017). Shelf life extension of white mushrooms (Agaricus bisporus) by low temperatures conditioning, modified atmosphere, and nano composite packaging material. Gholami et al (2017). Shelf life extension of white mushrooms (Agaricus bisporus) by low temperatures conditioning, modified atmosphere, and nano composite packaging material. Guillamón E, García-Lafuente A, Lozano M, Rostagno MA, Villares A, Martínez JA (2010). Edible mushrooms: role in the prevention of cardiovascular diseases. Fitoterapia 1;81(7): 715-23. Haq et al (2011). Biochemical analysis of fruiting bodies of Volvariella volvacea strain Vv pk, grown on six different substrates. Hernández-Rodríguez M, de-Miguel S, Pukkala T, Oria-de-Rueda JA, Martín-Pinto P (2015). Climate-sensitive models for mushroom yields and diversity in Cistus ladanifer scrublands. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 1;213: 173-82. Jamjumroon et al (2010). Responses of Straw Mushroom under Low Temperature Storage. Jiang T (2013) Effect of alginate coating on physicochemical and sensory qualities of button mushrooms (Agaricus bisporus) under a high oxygen modified atmosphere. Postharvest Biology and Technology 76: 91-97, Jiskani M.M. (2001). Energy potential of mushrooms. The DAWN, Economic and Business Review, 15- 21, 2001. P. IV. Kakon AJ, Choudhury MB, Saha S (2012). Mushroom is an ideal food supplement. Journal of Dhaka National Medical College & Hospital 19;18(1): 58-62. 44 Khan FO, Chandra R A (2017). Effect of physiochemical factors on fruiting body formation in mushroom. International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences 9: 33-6. Kim J S, Sapkota K, Park S E, Choi B S, Kim S, Hiep N T, Kim C S, Choi H S, Kim M K, Chun H S, Park Y (2006). A fibrinolytic enzyme from the medicinal mushroom Cordyceps militaris. Journal of Microbiology 44(6):622-31. Kumar S, Kaur G, Arora S and Kumar R (2013) Modified atmosphere packaging and storage of mushrooms. Asian Journal of Dairy and Food Research 32(2): 108-14. Kumar A, Singh M and Singh G. (2013). Effect of different pretreatments on the quality of mushrooms during solar drying. Journal of Food Science and Technology 50(1): 165-170. Kumari A and Baskaran P (2015). An Overview on Mushroom Technology: Cultivation, Harvesting, Post-Harvest Management and Marketing. Delhi, India: Manglam Publication. Lowry O H, Rosebrough N J, Farr A L and Randall R J (1951). Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. Journal Of Biological Chemistry 193: 265-275. Maalekuu K, Elkind Y, Leikin-Frenkel A, Lurie S, Fallik E (2006). The relationship between water loss, lipid content, membrane integrity and LOX activity in ripe pepper fruit after storage. Postharvest Biology and Technology 1;42(3): 248-55. Mahajan et al (2008). Development of a moisture absorber for packaging of fresh mushrooms (Agaricus bisporous). Manji et al (2001). Nutritional value of mushrooms widely consumed in Italy. Mehta B K, Jain S K, Sharma G P, Doshi A, Jain H K, Mudgal V D and Purohit RC (2012). An overview of processing of button mushroom (Agaricus bisporus). Beverage And Food World 37-40. Mohiuddin K M, Alam M M, Arefin M T, Ahmed I (2015). Assessment of nutritional composition and heavy metal content in some edible mushroom varieties collected from different areas of Bangladesh. Asian Journal Of Medical And Biological Research 1(3): 495-501. Muhammad B L, Suleiman B (2015). Global development of mushroom biotechnology. International Journal of Emerging Trends in Science and Technology 2(06): 2660-9. Muszynska B, Sulkowska-Ziaja K, Wolkowska M, Ekiert H (2011). Chemical, pharmacological, and biological characterization of the culinary-medicinal honey mushroom, Armillaria mellea (Vahl) P. Kumm.(Agaricomycetideae): a review. International journal of medicinal mushrooms 13(2). Ndungutse V, Mereddy R, Sultanbawa Y(2015). Bioactive Properties of Mushroom (A garicus bisporus) Stipe Extracts. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation 39(6): 2225-33. Nerya O, Ben-Arie R, Luzzatto T, Musa R, Khativ S, Vaya J (2006). Prevention of Agaricus bisporus postharvest browning with tyrosinase inhibitors. Postharvest Biology and Technology 1;39 (3): 272-7. 45 Nissar et al (2017). Effect of storage period on total phenolic content, ascorbic acid and titrable acidity of flour blends made from Himalayan variety of wheat, oat and mushroom flour packed in metalized polyester. Owaid M N, Abed A M, Nassar B M (2015). Recycling cardboard wastes to produce blue oyster mushroom Pleurotus ostreatus in Iraq. Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture 26: 53741. Öztürk M, Duru ME, Kivrak Ş, Mercan-Doğan N, Türkoglu A, Özler MA (2011). In vitro antioxidant, anticholinesterase and antimicrobial activity studies on three Agaricus species with fatty acid compositions and iron contents: A comparative study on the three most edible mushrooms. Food and Chemical Toxicology 1;49(6): 1353-60. Pereira E, Barros L, Martins A, Ferreira IC (2012). Towards chemical and nutritional inventory of Portuguese wild edible mushrooms in different habitats. Food Chemistry 15;130 (2): 394-403. Rai et al (2008). Post Harvest Technology Of Mushrooms. Ranganna S (2010). Handbook of analysis and quality control for fruit and vegetable products, second ed. Tata Mc Graw Hill Publication Co, New Delhi. Royse et al (2017). Current Overview of Mushroom Production in the World. Royse D J (2014). A global perspective on the high five: Agaricus, Pleurotus, Lentinula, Auricularia & Flammulina. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Mushroom Biology and Mushroom Products, New Delhi, India. Sakinah et al (2020). Evaluation of storage temperature, packaging system and storage duration on postharvest quality of straw mushroom (Volvariella volvacea). Sakinah N, Misran A, Mahmud TM, Abdullah S, Azhar M (2020). Evaluation of storage temperature, packaging system and storage duration on postharvest quality of straw mushroom (Volvariella volvacea). Food Research 4: 679-89. Sharma V P et al (2017). Status of mushroom production in India. Mushroom research 26(2):111-20. Singer R (1986) The Agaricales in modern taxonomy. 4th edn Koeltz Scientific Books. Koenigstein, Germany. Singh et al (2010). Recent advances in extending the shelf life of fresh Agaricus mushrooms: a review . Singh & Prasad. (2019). Biology and Growth Characteristics of Edible Mushroom: Agaricus compestris, Agaricus bisporous, Coprinus comatus. Singh N, Vaidya D, Mishra V, Thakur KS (2016). Shelf life and storage quality of white button mushrooms (Agaricus bisporus) as affected by packaging material. International Journal of Advanced Research 4(11): 1790-9. Singh R and Singh JM (2018). Mushroom growing in punjab: cost components, and determinants affecting its productivity. Agricultural economics research review 31(2): 299-304. 46 Sugar D, and Basile S R (2009). Low-temperature induction of ripening capacity in ‘Comice’ and ‘Bosc’ pears as influenced by fruit maturity, Postharvest biology and Technology 51:278-280. Tao et al (2006). Effects of different storage conditions on chemical and physical properties of white mushrooms after vacuum cooling. Ul Haq I, Khan M A, Khan S A and Ahmad M (2011). Biochemical analysis of fruiting bodies of Volvariella volvacea strain Vv pk, grown on six different substrates. Journal of Soil Environment 30(2): 146-150. Wani A M, Hussain P R, Meena R S, Dar M A and Mir M A (2009) Effect of gamma irradiation and sulphitation treatments on keeping quality of white button mushroom Agaricus bisporus. J Lge 44: 967-73 Xu, Y Tian, Y Ma, R Liu, Q & Zhang, J. (2016). Effect of plasma activated water on the postharvest quality of button mushrooms, Agaricus bisporus. Food Chemistry, 197, 436– 444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.10.144. Ye JJ, Li JR, Han XX, Zhang L, Jiang TJ, Miao XI (2012). Effects of active modified atmosphere packaging on postharvest quality of shiitake mushrooms (Lentinula edodes) stored at cold storage. Journal of Integrative Agriculture 1;11(3): 474-82. Yu L, Haley S, Perret J and Harris M (2002). Antioxidant properties of hard winter wheat extracts. Food Chemistry 78(4): 457-461. Zhang et al (2018). Recent advances in quality preservation of postharvest mushrooms (Agaricus bisporus): A review Effect of packaging and different storage conditions on quality Agaricus bisporus. 47 VITA Name : Father’s Name : Mother’s Name : Nationality : Date of Birth : Permanent Address : Phone No. : E-mail : EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATION Bachelor’s Degree : College : Year of Award : % Marks : Master’s Degree : University : Year of Award : OCPA : Title of Master’s Thesis : 48