-℄n`P`>M
Q+E
28"
Rick Durrett
P=L " p N <3g($%O_ = R &! R (Æ
0* = H /LN I ~. { }fP ( ? {z y jl H 80 S
oj\q)* +I  H5 =Hp+I Gompertz (L d) +
ILN [21]. ~*B y m 8 \ Æ}j. ` 80 SLNo~ 8 ! T p/
v1>: [13].
4QD}|,TDwC" A m :?*BÆ > R s y us (Agent-based) LNo\ ` 80 S0*GM b h3+ j\ ——
I;bhÆ+I q)qZm [1]. e(CRs[0*p: [4].
us )}=t " ,\B$N 0* Ut [24], l = " V LN Q= 8 (:
[16], [6], [8]).
E,?FNt R 8w 5y% LN " N 8 R s SLN% 9
=N_A4//_a=2 HD Nu1 P( ? 9|F 4
HKm 1 N*tR APC l%.2 N*Rl%H3 N*
! KRAS (K )4 ), 5y 4 N*4 P53 mt R ~. e
H R 9: Luebeck y Moolgavkar R Æ 5 [17] F Steven Frank J [12].
5' Fr " <yT s H 3 R x_, ' % kItD8
w <3_ ` APC =tpq) h { R l% &i*mmk /
8 - _h7 KRAS =tpf t R l% ~. G .H R * Q
Æ 4 sy^_mH&PÆ~.xZ = 8 *U~. NsT9
t = v P53 =~g 53 r &! rKJ g=t R U1
w"U* ? hhS .Q
H 3 R \Y 1;l359so <34"O}|,~ BRCA Æ
i ( 1g30v },6 e R8QHp e h& Il5t R
6{I /55 Q ?oFN 8 R s SLNt Re ; <3'k4t
R hÆp3 f4~.Z!obg a ,~./ u . 4{= E LN O_*GUt
UoTI =H R “e ;<3” 34i s 8w 4 20% HKmAPC <~.x y APC 46| uFWm f β– z&! W y
6 w =f ~. R0Ht<36 D9Ph q) DZ 0* &
Notices of the AMS, Vol. 60 (2013), No. 3, p. 304–309, Cancer Modeling: A Personal
Perspective, Rick Durrett, Figure number 3. Copyright c 2013 the American Mathematical Society.
Reprinted with permission. All rights reserved. ? q Qa ÆGGZYp
ÆG> Durham rsa James B. Duke QaBGf7 `> rtd@math.duke.
i
edu.
· 340 ·
rr ? 0
4 " N 8 R s SLNmi N* V/Æ b , +Y 6 ~.u (/Æ a , G
+ i + 1 N* (/Æ u . 4HÆHD(/=t R [/5 Markov (9 & o ;)
{/{ t = 0 /tR*4 t Rw/5V,\H/= a t + o(t).
( Z (t) = i N*4 t /s O 0 N* , \QÆ}R&Æ5 ~" [B
: Athreya y Ney E R Æ zv [2]. r λ = a − b =[;I/T; 0 N*4 t /
s "kO=
i
i
i+1
i
i
i
r a
i
i
EZ0 (t) = eλ0 t Z0 (0).
0
> b0 ,
T; 0 N*9Hg H /Æ λ /a ; g<Hg:
0
e
−λ0 t
0
Z0 (t) → V0 = exponential (a0 /λ0 ).
HÆ “→” 19O!~ H / 1 D V = exponential (r) & “V aO/ r”, H
{ v ≥ 0 / P (V > v) = e .
* N ( ?wC 0 → 1 → 2 → · · ·, H Rs S Xii8w x_ 1 N
*~./5 .<}938wZ 1 N* k ^:
−rv
t
EV0 eλ0 s · u1 · eλ1 (t−s) ds.
EZ1 (t) =
0
R U Y4/s s, 0 N* m L 2 R =~./ 3 R =4
t /s E ~.su O x= r 0 < λ0 < λ1 , H R k ^ EZ1 (t) rr Ma 1
N* O 8 uo \ 2EN 0 /5x4P u1 mH R\ 2= 6 H
(10−5 W "), g_<4 p 1Admtnk ^t R G+t R6 Hr H r #<<
4 8 ! " N s S ( ?/x$m4: V0eλ s ≈ 1/u1, y 1 N*~O[
/G+/5?WÆC Vb_sS 51 N*~.=6nh Poisson (7X)
s S Poisson s S 'LR y Laplace ( i U) . 8w,\o~QI
1
0
z
lm α = λ /λ . H R H r 4 V ^:
e−λ1 t Z1 (t) → V1 ,
0
1
Ee−θV1 = (1 + cu1 θα )−1 ,
0
E(e−θV1 | V0 ) = exp (−cu1 V0 θα )
/ W & I (5y& k  k > 1 N). 9: [11]. 8 ,=t R w, .
Laplace . HD 8 :4t j\+ H /uSm oB Æg=,r
p t= 8 “ _. (S − b )/a 0 y oW"4=1;”
4Hp$S, . Y1 (oX) =D( Qh xO9?i
g f~. 6 e/= 6 H ( R0 E # 6 Iq)
jR O. ~ so 4t; Barrett 2 h #aj\m [19], C M Rf jR&a
q){' e 5&ÆÆo~"DlgP $ RM? gq)jRÆb=Q
Y * tv y^jR ;I q)/ u jl* oWR W r
't 0 EqtDI * 9| Nq)*U5 ZM jR I~%
n
n
n
· 341 ·
1 uS# O9StTn r* kS I>ndo6NO l u S/t ,J0
>mv,J02 uS5 [0, .05] 6 ug9; 2:F/t,J0z5 d
0tmvQ Q y q 1 O+ _R kS+ #Q Jasmine Foo G+jR t r 9: [20] (4 PubMedCentral =D 7 , ).
q) " nR t R a0Simpson a0 R , o~ Æ R _^9 k N*
'6|~. H / y^_PUÆ | s 70 " [ tD e . <3o~QI k N* t R6 H8w H r
ER = 1 − α , mn a = λ
/λ .
z s Mt< X o~,\ R `i % &l 8 : 9: [10].
R Z6HDHrQÆoW (i) 9|~.P* 6 \ 2 Poisson s S19 —— H= "4 V
Æ/e; : 1, tRLX" N8Rs
Smq)jR 9 (ii) Poisson-Dirichlet ( q) 8 :'j\ O_1
e Y14 T p T n rmi+_m 4 LN_^9Z!
H ^ Rj W" 9: Pitman J [23].
1. P)LM
" N 8 R s SLNWt R 9* % 5 ~v xl3R W Æ
so t R 8w qr_'m+ Kaveh Danesh Æp qv_mJ D
Gmv+ q t R r % X Evan Myers y Laura Havriletsky :T “Æ
C 2 l2No " ℄ t
h2NE” ÆIfH R r=t R" N 8 R s
SLN 4H R LNm0 N*
2NI2 h m # ( q)
1 N* > 4 A um2 N*
=TD}R C 4 A O *
2 N*)*j o{z
(℄ p f g{grk
4/P&o Æ III F x 2 3ONOn$ ) + gO (45) B P+ g
4H R LNmi 0 N 1 N O ( 5) z|{+ gO (V5) nN Q) y i 1 N 2 N {.$%* F `y> [T , T ], mn T >$ ) r* ZX
0.5cm 1 S 06T > 10 S |{+ (* 1 r)
sz%6 ~.
06 Kaveh Danesh 2N t R r=X " 4
k
k
k
k
k−1
k
i
0
2
2
· 342 ·
0
9
4 III IV F ?_Kl 5 [k/9 30%, % U6( I F q)
F 5 [k/oo 90%. g r PW&wh4 I F % 9_W^X " +
K (Ye6 . #a II F —— 952N / I2 h q) —— 59RHY
14 I F y III F U5 ) E _x= T —T , lmT = t
h# ( q)YW= 0.5cm /5 (igz s R L*7Eo~i :), T = th
10 R 2 N* (6{tq) /5 HD = _ x [ 8 ~ U
Ylg/5 H r }T q)+I y ~./ Y H5=U_= 2.9
[r= 88 :$m4 [2.5, 3] [U5 gÆ"C=[Uo thE 9
: [7]. 2 U Yt < * 4 O0 ;I
2. ,FÆ 7A=
W (ÆWO_ 0*8 ! 8LN 47kXs+emj\)+L
N y Ising (xH) LN 4_ Ising LNm= R x#℄QÆE QÆo~= +1
(=) −1 (=,), y℄ + {[/f$N . =℄x# O { 4t R J3 xwm
#M v5mQR0=℄l℄U5 6
5 6 ( +46$ #5 % P h H
D8Ising LN=W`R.e6. Rj
't0EP+_1zH W (ÆTD!u 6e*GLN Cristini y Lowengrub J [6] 6 A
FN3}h#.LNHp.=OR3
H: "D F6us =L4 ^ k
-*.y*5Tp6 oG+9
, 24 R BO?LX4h 1mm } h mlLNq
W℄ ' xa %6 h : 3 LX
^ LN ? 0 WMQ 3 J 8 !xl 4
13R 4 2012 [ 8 + 7—10 > p - f O
a SIAM(Xs%O__) +Km_ (Life
Sciences meeting) =y Paul Macklin lH 3 ~ i $ NY + x >A
R LN LX,\= { ~a}vfC [18]. (&U% (TC) +
r=4 1 X j Camo: 3} h mV* >y<_+ >1
I w o(*k4 ! g *W ({pW ) + > W (W ) + > Z
a,&x[1 !r H=t R so r hAJVhA
t> 9
Æ 50% =R s 1 q)x[M ^R*W 2 Æabl5 (5~ d
i nK } &
hEMlH= Æ 1 h59= * & ). 5 WaGn 2:J
|[ T NY 06 (j -): 0,
r ZM W Æ9* LN W" I~ 7, 14, 21 z 28 u b [18], 5
B,O_v_+_ (Mathematical Medicine and 6,a1e -Y-|2
2
0
0
2
9
· 343 ·
2012 [ 1 dlm 2009 [urÆ “P,\LNMU1}” SIAM
0 Njn (SIAM three-part minisymposium) 8# H =L 0* 9i? | *Wx=Hp 0*~ soO4P r℄4H 0 Ed) 8LN y *
GRLN68W 8LNo}B*GRLN Y C% *GRLN:oiY8
LN ^ 8# 5yWi P BlBO
3. 5JTG
<Hn t_A<tD!If r?=9N g?qY R r L! 8 ! y }, 8 *M [22], ?t R 3* 8 Æ 6 R fN
0* }R& ( ?o V b/ 0. —— f!ZHsz (estrogen receptor/ER),
/{Hs (progesterone receptor/PR) y HER2 q) 8 }R G lC r x=v
w k4 Foq= I0 = 16% q)09<HD0.5 o Æ [27].
2012 [ .+ y t6; Marc Ryser 4: qPj\ j\%
Kimberly Blackwell /I't R r q)jRq)a n'oW9
. ~. g :oI3jR v5H ^ ~-MQ W 83 Wxa7E q_=T:o+D9W 8 nq)jR}f 3 R (false
Biology)
negatives).
FU5yF&e3jR ~" <}=T [25]. %Phr
Kq) DZj\x= ^ =LN U eE &4 f4h X " <}=
9T ~ ~ UT iSÆh7 ÆtJO_1 0* =j\8 v5LNi % I g D jRL8= { wLNBO ~Hp 0 8
Yo~ T pP N H r
4. I(3DC$O
2012 [ 8 + 23 (Nature) 0d\: (p. 462—463 “I g ” >o),
146 Qb1Iq) K * (CSC) k4CSC W ` >iz K *G+OH W
TnG+q)* CSC k4tYk4M z[j\1I{ *
&x#KsV/ ~ " oPg YHn H5 q)* ta
=f4 % U |j aY?*il+I Vmz[oW G
.lQÆ g9: [29].
3 _I5lm_ ( 14 ([5], [9]), 't_ ( 14m_ (Science) [26], tpP j)~ y^*M41 q)m~*i % +DHp .
: Hp3lA*M=~wGr" O T,y Ig=~U %
6Lo N |\ K * _3%= : 3G+3lm g D QÆO_1?o
so :oI : * ~B, [28] F il 1, m (4 CSC y R
Æ LN, q)Pj
^ x = &sm ~v k4., OH K *tD8w<3q=
T g℄ 10 R HKÆm=t R =x 0 a ,== R Æm 4—20 R
OH K * b `m K *G+*lmtD4 { /s =T$ xT$
7
· 344 ·
/oW= 10% FqoW= 90%.
~It/5 ÆÆK*=9 P8 "G+tRK*y tR*
% N j\1I /* 8 " H r = RK */= R * [15].
( 1 = F 8 !6e{= Bramson y Griffeath 30 [tE t_ e ^
aLN A [3], e? E H r HKÆOb t)}m
5. 1'#9H<:N-&
+_9= _ },_ _ 6 5 y / 5}RqY ? 0 O_
r< T5 O_1qo~ ~ hJ j\HDr % ~4+j_
y^_14=Pr 25 [ X Rli+m 80% r=oIf “
r=1;”, 61;O_ X T= { Bt R ` 8w LNMQI!
j\5yWTItD 39 "
6. 40KR!,D.*>IU6*/
vZ =ms 2012 [ 8 + 7—10 4-fOEh SIAM +Km_4
n5~"PLN :* 2014 [W"| V 2014—2015 [O_+
m_)?qZtRMP=L&!8wx T/ZW `Bk2m=8
54 ritDAF4 http://michorlab.dfci.harvard.edu/
index.php/publications z s| Franziska Michor , Wk/ )!Y
o A=(/5 " N4Yb MathSciNet (> p O_g5 (Mathematical Reviews) 7 —— x) /U Y 2000 [~ ( 1 2423 _ e P 5 y 212 _ e 3 5e 3 5 " O=}, 8 ! ` 80
S ToW4 100 " _ e b h +Q 5mB W" arXiv (O_2
z —— x) m +_= 8 P=L5xqLÆbD$ E =h 5
PubMedCentral (> pp +j\) NIH q Z t; = k|+v_+Km_m
j2 —— x), NIH ℄CUFUo4HE ( :e 5 H/=t Rv ?$q
=t R ?$ 2010 [~40rm u “3” 5 3800 _
^ Zo~i0d y J#mrL$x=RtÆbMO_+_&!
v0* =Bt+_1v_j\ %n5 n= ℄ 5A+ v5C
BYZW D1;we j\59x= T^ <} ~ "=
SB (4)
%;?
[ 1 ] T. Alrón, Modeling tumor-induced angiogenesis: A review of individual-based models
and multi-scale approaches, p. 45–75 in Mathematics, Developmental Biology, and
Tumor Growth, Contemporary Math., vol. 492, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI,
2009.
[ 2 ] K. Athreya and P. Ney, Branching Processes, Springer,New York, 1972.
[ 3 ] M. Bramson and D. Griffeath, Asymptotics for interacting particle systems on Zd ,
Probability Theory and Related Fields 53 (1980).
· 345 ·
[ 4 ] H. Byrne and D. Draso, Individual-based and continuum models of growing cell populations: A comparison, J. Math. Biol. 58 (2009), 657–687.
[ 5 ] J. Chen et al., A restricted cell population propagates glioblastoma growth after chemotherapy, Nature 488 (2012), 522–526.
[ 6 ] V. Cristini and J. Lowengrub, Multi-Scale Modeling of Cancer, Cambridge Univ. Press,
2010.
[ 7 ] K. Danesh, R. Durrett, L. Havrilesky, and E. Myers, A branching process model of
ovarian cancer, J. Theoret. Biol., to appear.
[ 8 ] T. S. Deisboeck, Z. Wang, P. Macklin, and V. Cristini, Multiscale cancer modeling,
Ann. Rev. Biomed. Engr. 13 (2011), 127–155.
[ 9 ] G. Driessens, B. Beck, A. Caauwe, B. D. Simons, and C. Blanplan, Defining the mode
of tumour growth by clonal analysis, Nature 488 (2012), 527–531.
[10] R. Durrett, J. Foo, K. Leder, J. Mayberry, and F. Michor, Intratumor heterogeneity in
evolutionary models of tumor progression, Genetics 188 (2011), 461–477.
[11] R. Durrett and S. Moseley, Evolution of resistance and progression to disease during
clonal expansion of cancer, Theor. Pop. Biol. 77 (2010), 42–48.
[12] Steven A. Frank, Dynamics of Cancer, Princeton Univ. Press, 2007.
[13] A. Friedman, Tutorials in Mathematical Biosciences, II: Cell cycle, proliferation, and
cancer, Springer Lecture Notes in Math., vol. 1872, 2005.
[14] M. Kimmel and D. E. Axelrod, Branching Processes in Biology, Springer, New York,
2002.
[15] C. Lopez-Garcia, A. M. Klein, B. D. Simons, and D. J. Winton, Intestinal stem cell
replacement follows a pattern of neutral drift, Science 330 (2010), 822–825.
[16] J. Lowengrub, H. B. Frieboes, F. Jin, Y. L. Chuang, X. Li, P. Macklin, S. M. Wise, and
V. Cristini, Nonlinear modeling of cancer: Bridging the gap between cells and tumors,
Nonlinearity 23 (2010), R1–R91.
[17] E. G. Luebeck and S. H. Moolgavkar, Multi-stage carcinogenesis and the incidence of
colorectal cancer, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99 (2002), 15095–15100.
[18] P. Macklin, M. E. Edgerton, A. M. Thompson, and V. Cristini, Patient-calibrated agentbased modelling of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): From microscopic measurements to
macroscopic predictions of clinical progression, J. Theoret. Biol. 301 (2012), 122–140.
[19] C. C. Maley et al., Genetic clonal diversity predicts progression to esophageal adenocarcinoma, Nature Genetics 18 (2006), 468–473.
[20] A. Marusyk and K. Polyak, Tumor heterogeneity: Causes and consequences, Biochem.
Biophys. Acta. 1805, no. 1 (2010), 105–117. PMC2814927
[21] L. Norton, A Gompertzian model of human breast cancer growth, Cancer Research 48
(1988), 7067–7071.
[22] C. M. Perou, Molecular portraits of human breast tumors, Nature 406 (2000), 747–752.
[23] J. Pitman, Combinatorial Stochastic Pro-cesses, Springer-Verlag, Berlin. Available at
http://works.bepress.com/jim pitman/1/
[24] V. Quaranta, K. A. Rejniak, P. Gerlee, and A. R. A. Anderson, Invasion emerges from
cancer cell adaptation to competitive micro-environments, Seminars in Cancer Biology
18 (2008), 338–348.
[25] H. G. Russnes, N. Navin, J. Hicks, and A. L. Borresen-Dale, Insight into the heterogeneity of breast cancer through next-generation sequencing, Journal of Clinical
Investigation 121 (2011), 3810–3818.
[26] A. G. Schepers et al., Lineage tracing reveals Lgr5+ stem cell activity in mouse intestinal adenomas, Science 337 (2012), 730–735.
(
304 )
,{
· 346 ·
r