QUESTION 3.
The Autocratic leadership style approach is when the leader of the group (director,
supervisor and etc.) makes all decisions by himself/herself, defining by
himself/herself all the activities of subordinates and refusing any initiative from
them. The Democratic leadership style approach is when the leader of the group
involves subordinates in decision-making process based on and produces its own
problems. In the next two paragraphs we will take a closer look at pros and cons of
these two leadership styles.
The autocratic style is more aggressive comparing to the democratic style. The
Autocratic leader alone determines the direction of the department or organization
by making decisions and in many ways this style allows to achieve great results and
productivity. However, this style works excellent if a manger has to deal with new
employees who are in the process of training.
Democratic leadership, also known as participative leadership, is a type of leadership
style in which members of the group take a more participative role in the decisionmaking process. Unlike the autocratic, this styles gives everyone the opportunity to
participate, ideas are exchanged freely, and discussion is encouraged. The
performance of each member is acknowledged and honored.
In comparison with the autocratic which creates an environment of fear and
resentment because of dissatisfaction of subordinates, the democratic style works
well for leaders who value flexibility and adaptation. Democracy in leadership is
often most effective when a leader is working with highly skilled or experienced
workers. It allows the leader to capitalize on their employees' individual talents and
strengths, while also benefiting from the power of the whole. It is best employed in
cases where the department or business is looking to implement operational changes
or when a leader or manager is attempting to resolve problems either individually or
within the group.