Contents INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................ 3 Organizational Background .......................................................................................................... 3 I. Structure .............................................................................................................................................. 3 Scope ................................................................................................................................................... 4 Financial............................................................................................................................................... 4 FRAMEWORK FOR ANALYSIS .............................................................................................................. 5 ANALYSIS OF THE CASE ....................................................................................................................... 6 Vision, Mission, Goals and Objectives ........................................................................................ 6 I. Current Mission and Vision Statements.......................................................................................... 6 Critique on the Mission and Vision Statements ............................................................................. 6 Proposed Mission and Vision Statements ...................................................................................... 7 Goals and Objectives......................................................................................................................... 7 Internal and External Evaluation .................................................................................................. 8 II. Internal Factor Evaluation ................................................................................................................. 8 External Factor Evaluation .............................................................................................................. 11 Competitive Profile Matrix ............................................................................................................... 14 III. Strategy Formulation ............................................................................................................... 15 SWOT Matrix..................................................................................................................................... 15 SPACE Matrix ................................................................................................................................... 17 Grand Strategy Matrix ..................................................................................................................... 19 EVALUATION OF STRATEGIES .......................................................................................................... 19 Strategies Generated........................................................................................................................... 20 Initial Strategy Assessment – Rumelt’s Criteria........................................................................... 21 Initial Strategy Assessment – Matching Matrices........................................................................ 22 I. Decision Stage.............................................................................................................................. 23 Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix .......................................................................................... 23 ACTION PLAN .......................................................................................................................................... 33 ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE........................................................................................................ 54 Existing Organizational Chart of WWF ............................................................................................. 54 Proposed Organizational Structure ................................................................................................... 55 PROPOSED STRATEGY REVIEW AND EVALUATION PROCESS .............................................. 56 1 Impact .................................................................................................................................................... 56 Internal consistency ............................................................................................................................. 56 Consistency with the environment ..................................................................................................... 57 Appropriate use of available resources ............................................................................................ 57 Appropriate time horizon ..................................................................................................................... 57 Workability ............................................................................................................................................. 57 CONCLUSION .......................................................................................................................................... 58 2 INTRODUCTION I. Organizational Background As the world’s leading conservation organization, World Wildlife Fund works in 100 countries and is supported by more than one million members in the United States and close to five million globally. WWF's unique way of working combines global reach with a foundation in science, involves action at every level from local to global, and ensures the delivery of innovative solutions that meet the needs of both people and nature. World Wildlife Fund was founded in April 29, 1961, and its current headquarters situated in Gland, Switzerland. WWF employs about 6,200 full-time staff members who manage about 1,300 projects on the average. Structure The World Wildlife Fund is structured divisionally, as shown below on Figure 1. There are five divisions reporting to COO Marcia Marsh, including the newest division, simply titled Oceans. 3 Scope As their current strategy suggests, WWF has committed to make a difference—in partnership with many others—by making measurable progress against six key goals which are: FORESTS FRESH WATER OCEANS Conserve the world's most important forests. Safeguard healthy oceans Secure water for people and nature. and marine livelihoods. WILDLIFE FOOD CLIMATE Protect the world's most important Double net food availability; Create a climate-resilient species. freeze its footprint. and zero-carbon world, powered by renewable Source: energy. www.worldwildlife.org/initiatives/ Financial In 2014, WWF has an investment of about $10 billion in more than 13,000 conservation projects in over 150 countries. Within the USA, WWF operates as a nonprofit organization and is headquartered in Washington, DC. WWF generated $291.49 million in operating revenue in 2014, resulting from a fundraising expense of $28.70 million. A total of $224.46 million was expended by the organization in direct support of conservation programs. The symbol of WWF is the Giant Panda (the endangered black and white bear from China 4 FRAMEWORK FOR ANALYSIS WWF’s major opportunity is the increase in consumer awareness of the results of their actions while its major threat is the decline in the global condition of wildlife and wild areas To help stop the continuous degradation of the earth’s natural environment and to lead the human race in a future wherein humans live in harmony with nature An action plan was made for the implementation of the strategies Mission was too broad. Team decided to narrow down WWF’s focus into wildlife Develop Mission and Vision Statement Perform External Audit Perform Internal Audit Establish Long Term Goals and Objectives Generate, Evaluate and Select Strategies Implement Strategies – Management Issues Implement Strategies – Marketing, Finance, Accounting, R&D and MIS Issues Measure and Evaluate Performance WWF’s major strength lies in its efficient funding and utilization of resources and expenses while its major weakness includes the decrease in their in-kind contributions. The SWOT, SPACE and Grand Strategy Matrices were used to generate strategies. Rumelt’s criteria as well as the matching matrices were used to evaluate the strategies generated to determine strategies that will be used in the QSPM Strategies will be evaluated using the following criteria: Impact, Internal Consistency, Consistency with the Environment, Appropriate use of Available Resources, Workability, and Appropriate Time Horizon 5 ANALYSIS OF THE CASE I. Vision, Mission, Goals and Objectives Current Mission and Vision Statements Vision: To build a future in which people live in harmony with nature Mission: To conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life (2) on Earth (3) Critique on the Mission and Vision Statements The vision statement answers the firm’s question what do we want to become. It should be clear and should reveal the type of business that the firm engages on. World Wild Fund’s vision statement “to build a future in which people live in harmony with nature” does not answer the question what do we want to become. It is also too broad as to its scope and vague. The mission statement is firm’s statement of purpose that should distinguish it from similar organizations. It should contain the nine mission components— customers, products or services, markets, technology, survival, growth & profitability, philosophy, self-concept, public image, and employees. WWF’s mission statement lacks the following components: Customers Technology Survival, growth, and profitability Philosophy Distinctive Competence Public Image Employees Its mission statement does not distinguish it from other non-profit organizations that are also bent in protecting the environment. The statement is also too broad. 6 Proposed Mission and Vision Statements Vision: To be the forerunner in saving the Earth’s wildlife, building a future in which people and nature live in harmony Mission: WWF is committed in protecting the world’s wildlife through innovative programs by partnering with various Earth warriors worldwide, preserving the biological diversity by conserving the crucial species and their habitat important to the people. We aspire to develop and grow in order to inspire others of our preservation efforts thus ensuring the continuation of our purposes for the future. Goals and Objectives World Wildlife Fund was founded to achieve a major goal, and that is to help stop the continuous degradation of the earth’s natural environment and to lead the human race in a future wherein humans live in harmony with nature. These goal will only be achieved through accomplishing these three simpler goals; first is conservation of the earth’s biodiversity, second is the sustainability of the use of renewable natural resources and lastly is to reduce the pollution caused by harmful human activities. WWF is putting all its efforts to make sure that endangered and iconic species are protected and are healing in their habitats. They are also ensuring that the most important forests are well preserved and their benefits to human well-being are sustained and improved. WWF is also moving to towards one of its goals, to ensure that the ocean ecosystems as well as freshwater ecosystems are conserved and productive to sustain the livelihood and biodiversity. Aside from these, WWF is promoting a global shift toward a low carbon usage for a climate resilient future. The organization has several objectives that will lead them into fulfilling the organization’s goals which is to protect the world’s biodiversity as well as the creatures in it that are on the verge of extinction and to lead the human race in living in harmony with nature. These objectives are: To build partnerships with other non-profit organizations, governments, local communities and businesses to attain effectiveness and emphasize the need for collaborative effort for the success and protection of the environment. 7 To use the best available scientific information in addressing and evaluating the issues that is arising about the state of the ecosystems around the world. To create filed based projects, policy initiatives, and education work as concrete conservation and protection solutions. To use the funds that were entrusted by the donors in an efficient and cost effective manner and deliver according to the standards or even greater services in preserving the only life support system we have, nature. II. Internal and External Evaluation Assessing WWF’s internal characteristics as well as their external position with regards to the organization’s opportunities and threats is a crucial step in devising effective and efficient strategies. Through evaluating WWF’s internal and external environment, the strategists will have a very good idea of the things that they can strengthen and improve using the resources that they have. Assessments of these factors are made below using the following strategic tools: Internal Factor Evaluation (IFE), External Factor Evaluation (EFE), and Competitive Profile Matrix (CPM). Internal Factor Evaluation WWF’s key strengths and weaknesses are listed below and evaluated through assigning weights and ratings based on their impact to the organization. WWF’s current and previous operations, organizational structure, financial statements, and other internal aspects are taken into consideration. Key Internal Factors Weigh t Rating Weighte d Score Strengths 8 Had an expense of only $0.0985 for each $1 raised making 1 it one of the top non-profit organizations. ($291.49M operating revenue were generated in 2014 from $28.7 M 0.09 4 0.36 0.06 4 0.24 0.07 4 0.28 0.06 4 0.24 0.06 4 0.24 0.05 4 0.2 0.04 4 0.16 0.02 3 0.060 0.02 3 0.06 0.02 3 0.06 0.03 3 0.09 0.04 3 0.12 0.04 3 0.12 fundraising expense). 2 77% of revenues were spent in direct support of conservation programs. World’s largest independent, nonprofit conservation 3 organization with a strong brand name and a long, respected history of successful track records. 4 Administrative expense and fundraising expenses represent only 4.8% and 10.8% of total expenses respectively. Has great global presence (operates in 100 countries, 1M 5 members in the US, 5M members globally, 6200 fulltime staff). 6 7 8 9 Partnership with big organizations such as UNEP, IUCN, Coca Cola, Avon, etc., in achieving WWF's objectives. The current ratio increased from 2.28 in 2013 to 2.35 in 2014 while the working capital has a ratio of 1.59:1. Strong organizational code of ethics to remain global, independent, multicultural, and nonparty political. WWF's 10-year goal to "measurably conserve 15 to 20 of the world's most important eco-regions. WWF's successful past projects including Wildlands and 1 Human Needs initiative on the co-existence of both rural 0 people and wild animals without having negative impact on the natural habitats. 1 In support of global conservation, Bank of America has 1 offered a WWF Visa card since 2009 1 2 1 4 Renewal of partnership with Coca Cola (partner since 2007) until the year 2020. The partnership focuses on reducing the carbon content & sustaining fresh water supplies. Recognizing its impact on the environment, Avon - a large producer of brochures and consumer paper products with distribution in over 120 countries, has partnered with WWF 9 in two key areas. Weaknesses In-kind contribution decreased by 27% from $64.3M in 2013 1 to $46.96M in 2014 which is not good since funding relies 0.07 1 0.07 0.05 1 0.05 0.06 1 0.06 0.04 1 0.04 0.03 1 0.03 0.03 2 0.06 0.02 2 0.04 0.05 2 0.1 0.03 2 0.06 0.02 2 0.04 heavily on contribution. Operating Expense on Public Education Program 2 decreased by 20.83% from $81.74M in 2013 to $64.71M in 2014. 3 Have a broad focus, mission, and vision which may be difficult to attend to. Have dual title in their Organizational Structure such as that 4 for President and CEO, and Senior Vice President and General Counsel. 5 6 7 WWF's stand in Cecil the Lion's killing issue when they tolerated hunting for sports. Individuals contributed 32% while corporations contributed only 4% of total revenue. Bequests, endowments, and split income gifts decreased by 58.27% from $29.21M in 2013 to $12.19M in 2014. 8 No distinguishing characteristic from competitors. 9 Even with WWF's efforts to save Rhinos, still, Rhino poaching has increased by 9,346% from 2007 to 2014. 10 Total Total asset turnover decreased from 0.61% in 2013 to 0.59% in 2014. 1 2.78 WWF’s major strength lies in its efficient funding and utilization of resources and expenses. The name that it has established for decades in an international scale has also given them an edge as well as the experience the organization has garnered during those more than 50 years of existence. These reputation and experiences has led them into establish strong partnerships and connections with different governments and other big organization which gave 10 them better access and resources into achieving its mission and vision. However, becoming very big and globally known also has its drawbacks. WWF’s major weakness would include the decrease in their in-kind contributions which is not good since their operations rely heavily on donations (with them being a non-profit organization). This may be because of the organization being too wide that more eyes are on them giving rise to controversies such as its view on the killing of Cecil the Lion wherein they tolerated trophy hunting. WWF also has very broad mission and vision which may be difficult to address. External Factor Evaluation WWF’s opportunities and threats are listed below and evaluated through assigning weights and ratings based on their impact to the organization. The following factors below are a summary of the information gained from WWF’s external environment. Key External Factors Weigh Ratin Weighte t g d Score 0.06 3 0.18 0.05 3 0.15 0.04 2 0.08 0.05 3 0.15 Opportunities 1. Expansion of WWF Office to Myanmar after partnering with the government (regarded as rich natural capital; 3 pristine rivers, over 250 mammal species, more than 10000 bird species) 2. Global awareness for wildlife welfare on many fronts was raised due to the death of Cecil (a lion) by a hunter named Palmer 3. Increase of 12% contribution from 2013-2014 for non-profit organizations, philanthropy is now becoming more prevalent. 4. In 2014, HP Canada partnered with WWF to launch Spring Things – which creates a link between employees and environmental conservation through events and campaigns 11 5. In 2014, WWF worked with the Namibian Ministry of Environment and Tourism to field test an integrated network of technologies. In the second phase, WWF will work with 0.06 3 0.18 0.05 3 0.15 0.06 3 0.18 0.06 3 0.18 0.07 2 0.14 0.05 2 0.1 0.03 2 0.06 0.05 3 0.15 0.06 2 0.12 0.05 2 0.1 additional governments, including Nepal and Kenya, to implement the project under different field conditions. 6. A US government legislation was implemented - Wildlife Trafficking Enforcement Act, which increased the penalties associated with wildlife trafficking 7. Establishment the Bioplastic Feedstock Alliance, where leading global companies have committed to the development of plastics made from plant-based material 8. 1 billion people rely on fish as an important part of their diet and that more than 520 million livelihoods are supported by fishing and it related activities. 9. According to National Geographic, 68% of consumers in 18 countries believe that climate changes are due to human actions 10. According to Fortune, 100 companies report savings of$1.1 billion annually through energy efficiency and renewable energy. 11. According to New York Times, number of nonprofits has increased 60% in the last decade. Threats 1. The Nature Conservancy’s research shows that currently half of the world’s major rivers are seriously polluted and/or depleted and that within 10 years, most people on the planet will face water shortages 2. Global condition of wildlife and wild areas has steadily declined, especially in the ocean, 60 percent of the world’s ecosystems declined. 3. World’s population expected to grow to 9 billion by 2050 and the demand for food is expected to double 12 4. Leading hazards to human health are climate change, stratospheric ozone depletion, changes in ecosystems due to loss of biodiversity, changes in hydrological systems and the 0.04 3 0.12 0.03 2 0.06 0.04 2 0.08 0.02 2 0.04 0.04 2 0.08 0.04 2 0.08 0.05 3 0.15 supply of freshwater, land degradation, and stresses on foodproducing systems. 5. Only 3.4% of oceans are being protected - they might cover over 70% of our planet’s surface, but even the vast majority of the world’s few marine parks and reserves are protected in name only. 6. International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) forecasts a temperature rise of 2.5 degrees 7. The Brazilian economy contracted 0.2 in quarter 3 of 2014, following a drop in the previous period. This is a threat to conservation efforts especially in the Amazon Rainforest 8. Globally, the loss of forests at a staggering 48 football fields per minute 9. Wildlife population of mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians, and fish have declined by 52% over the last 40 years 10. According to GEF organization, the land degradation affects 33% of the earth’s land surface, with consequences affecting more than 2.6 billion in more than 100 countries Total 1 2.62 Partnering with commercial companies to start joint project initiatives is one of the main opportunities available to WWF. Collective efforts with business establishments and the government distinctly outweigh all the other opportunities. Being with these entities who are into conserving nature, serves as a stepping stone for companies to allocate funds in supporting a sustainable eco-management system. One cannot reverse the negative impact done by several commercial industries anymore. What can be done is to assist them in managing future developments that can reach a sustainable environment where conservation efforts work together with entities that need resources to supply manufacturing and growth. 13 The threats illustrated in the EFE matrix are environmental issues which are critical and if not addressed properly can lead to scarce resources and damaged natural resources. “Global condition of wildlife and wild areas has steadily declined, especially in the ocean, 60 percent of the world’s ecosystems declined.” Increase in the demand for food supply, pollution and the decline in wildlife population pose a threat to countries that have a bigger population to supply and to protect. Competitive Profile Matrix A CPM below is made in order to compare WWF’s performance with other non-profit organizations (NPOs) having similar goals and objectives with the organization. These NPOs are The Nature Conservancy, Conservation International, and Wildlife Conservation Society. With this, major strengths and weaknesses of WWF in comparison with that of the other three organizations are analysed based on their strategic position. This will be useful in designing or offensive strategies later. Comparative Profile Matrix WWF The Nature Conservation Conservancy International Wildlife Conservation Society Critical Success Weight Rating Score Rating Score Rating Score Rating Score Factors Fundraising 0.20 2 0.40 4 0.80 1 0.20 3 0.6 0.20 2 0.40 3 0.60 1 0.20 4 0.8 (Partnerships) 0.15 2 0.30 4 0.60 1 0.15 3 0.45 Advertising 0.10 2 0.20 4 0.40 1 0.10 3 0.3 Quality 0.10 2 0.20 3 0.30 2 0.20 4 0.4 Expense 0.04 3 0.12 2 0.08 1 0.04 4 0.16 Conservation Projects' Success Collaborative Efforts Project 14 Efficiency Fundraising Expense Efficiency 0.03 3 0.09 2 0.06 1 0.03 4 0.12 Market Share 0.03 2 0.06 4 0.12 1 0.03 3 0.09 Revenue 0.05 2 0.10 4 0.20 1 0.05 3 0.15 0.05 2 0.10 4 0.20 1 0.05 3 0.15 0.05 2 0.10 3 0.15 1 0.05 4 0.2 Growth Potential Financial Profit Weighted Score 2.07 3.51 1.10 3.42 (insert summary here) III. Strategy Formulation Different strategies are formulated through the use of SWOT Matrix, SPACE Matrix, and GRAND Strategy Matrix. Strategies that are to be selected and implemented are chosen from the ones that were made in this stage. Also, before proceeding to the decision stage, the strategies generated are narrowed down through the use of Rumelt’s Criteria. A checklist is also made in order to check the strategies’ consistency with the matrices used. SWOT Matrix The strategies created using the SWOT Matrix made use of all available information regarding WWF's internal and external environment. In addition, the modification in the mission and vision statement of the company was also incorporated in the matching of key external and internal factors. Basically, the strategies formulated using the SWOT Matrix aims to capitalize WWF's strengths, exploit all possible opportunities, minimize or completely eliminate weaknesses and mitigate threats. 15 SO Strategies 1. Increase advertising cost to 10% to capture 15% increase in contribution (in-kind and monetary) from private institutions following the trend of philanthropy. (S3, S5,O3) 2. Launch Eyes on the Sea project with the US and other governments that will completely ban illegal fishing (S3,S5,O6,O8) 3. Highlight WWF's efficiency in managing expenses to gain funding from governments seeking to donate. (S1,S2,S4,O3) 4. Use partnership with Avon to commanage Salonga National Park in the Democratic Republic of Congo with the aim of addressing illegal logging, biodiversity loss and to support local livelihoods. (S14, O9) 5. Form a team that would assess Myanmar's natural resources which would include identifying where they are located, what benefits they provide to people and how they might change under different climate change and development scenarios. This assessment may enable better policy decisions for the country as a whole. (S5, O1) 6. Continue partnering with the US government, other governments and TRAFFIC to put increased security on wild land trafficking by launching the project Fight for the Wild (S10, O6) 7. Form a partnership with Durrell Wildlife Conservation Trust and Dreamworks Productions to launch the project, SAVE MAURICE, which aims to increase the protection provided to lemurs and other wildlife in the Madagascar forest. (S9, O11) 8. Provide trainings and immersions to employees to encourage employee commitment. (S5, O4, O9) WO Strategies 1. Increase spending in public education by 10% to encourage increasing awareness of environmental issues (W2, O2, O9) 2. Increase bequests, endowments and split income gifts by 10% by capturing a portion of the increasing trend of philanthropy (advertisements) (W7,O11) 3. Disrupt global tiger trade in Myanmar through Wildlife Crime Law Reinforcement and promotion of new wildlife legislation to improve brand image (W5, O1) 16 ST Strategies 1. Use partnership with Coca-Cola to promote sustainable packaging of commercial products (S12, T4 ) 2. Increase investment in R&D by 10% that would aim to capture the environmental situation which would aid WWF in their efficient planning of conservation efforts and monitoring emerging threats (S5 + S9 + T1 + T2 + T3 + T4 + T5 + T6 + T7 + T8 + T9 + T10) 3. Partner with the local government to enforce more effective policies to communities surrounding the Yangtze river regarding proper disposal of agricultural waste (S10, T2) WT Strategies 1. Rectify taint in brand image by improving current projects on wildlife conservation (W5, T2, T9) 2. Consider partnering with other NPOs on projects regarding climate change (W8, T4,T6) SPACE Matrix INTERNAL ANALYSIS EXTERNAL ANALYSIS Financial Position (FP) Stability Position (SP) Fund conversion efficiency Working capital intensity Fundraising expenses Administrative expenses Return on fundraising expenses 6 Competition 4 Market entry barriers 5 Demand variability 4 5 4.8 Collaborative efforts Technological changes -4 -5 -3 -3 -2 -3.4 17 Competitive Position (CP) Industry Position (IP) Market Share -3 Productivity 6 Programs’ success -2 Financial stability 5 Fundraising know-how -2 Growth potential 2 Contributor loyalty -2 Profit potential 2 Investment control -1 -2 Market easy entrance 4 3.8 The table above shows that on the average, WWFs’ internal strategic position, both in financial and competitive aspects are relatively strong. However, looking at an external perspective, WWF has an average level of stability such as in its economic position. The SPACE Matrix would tell us that that World Wildlife Fund falls into the Aggressive quadrant, which means that WWF has a stable position in the market with rapid growth. Hence, it needs to use its internal strengths (which actually resulted to a higher value than the external variables) to develop a market penetration and market development strategy. Furthermore, they could also incorporate service development, integration with other companies, acquisition of competitors, and so on. 18 Being an organization where the funds/contributions are its lifeline, its implicit strategy to be done is to acquire financial strength to compensate for the industrial position so that the organization follows an aggressive strategy. Hence, we have proposed the following strategies which parallel the aggressive strategy as suggested by this matrix: SPACE1: Increase Social Media presence by spreading infographic materials online, provocative ads, and videos highlighting environmental issues SPACE2: WWF can organize fundraising events like Run for Change, Run for Panda or Panda Runner, a marathon event globally Grand Strategy Matrix As shown on Figure # below, WWF falls in Quadrant I which means that it belongs to a rapid market growth with a strong competitive advantage wherein we consider it as an organization with a strong strategic position. Hence, it is better for this organization to concentrate both in market and service development. However, in cases where WWF excessive resources is appropriate to used: Backward, forward, or horizontal integration may be effective strategies. Quadrant I firms can afford to take advantage of external opportunities in several areas. EVALUATION OF STRATEGIES 19 Strategies Generated After identifying the strategies suitable for the WWF’s strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats, we were able to come up with general strategies which includes or have grouped together the specific strategies we have presented in the matching stage. After which, we also identified on what kind these strategies are – whether they be integration, intensive, or defensive. Hence the strategies are presented below with its specific strategy type and the SWOT Matrix Strategies involved. Specific Strategies General Strategies Strategy Type MP SO 1 MP SO 3 Improve visibility and increase people’s awareness through MP WO2 environmental education, communication, marketing and MD SPACE1 campaigns SD SPACE2 SD SO 2 SD SO 2 SD SO 2 SD SO 2 SD SO 2 Strengthen public and private collaborations focusing on the CSR MD, SD WO3 initiatives of those institutions. SD ST1 MP, SD ST3 SD WT1 SD WT2 SD SO 8 MP WO1 Increase efforts on fundraising Increase investment in R&D by 10% that would aim to capture the SD ST2 environmental stuation which would aid WWF in their efficient planning of conservation efforts and monitoring emerging threats 20 Initial Strategy Assessment – Rumelt’s Criteria In order to narrow down the strategies we have previously identified, we used Rumelt’s Criteria for evaluating the strategies to help us determine which among them should we prioritized according to their consistency, consonance, feasibility and advantage. Hence we created a rubric as presented on the table below which shows the weights we have assigned for each criteria. We gave feasibility a weight of 40% because as a non-profit organization, projects would most likely depend on capability to be implemented. On the other hand, we gave consistency the lowest weight as it is innate for every organization to actually abide with its guiding principles and policies in terms of the strategies they need to implement which makes it an Inconsequential criterion. After ranking the projects from 1-4, with 1 being the least priority, and 4 the most, we have come up with its weighted scores that shows we need to prioritize strategies that focuses on WWF’s collaboration with public and private organizations which focuses on their CSR initiatives to also help WWF in its advocacies. Consonanc 1. Feasibilit Consistency Advantag Weighte e (25%) y (40%) (15%) e (20%) d Score 3 4 2 4 3.45 4 3 4 2 3.2 2 2 3 3 2.35 Strengthen public and private collaborations focusing on the CSR initiatives of those institutions. 2. Improve visibility and increase people’s awareness through environmental education, communication, marketing and campaigns 3. Increase investment in R&D by 10% that would aim to capture the environmental situation which would aid 21 WWF in their efficient planning of conservation efforts and monitoring emerging threats 4. Increase efforts on fundraising 1 1 1 1 1 Initial Strategy Assessment – Matching Matrices In order to also check the strategies’ consistency with the matrices we used, a checklist is presented below on the table below showing whether they are applicable or have been applied to the following matrices. As a result, all the four strategies are present in the matrices, thus makes them candidates to be chosen as final strategies to be implemented SWOT 1. GSM SPACE Strengthen public and private collaborations ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ and monitoring emerging threats ✔ ✔ ✔ 4. Increase efforts on fundraising ✔ ✔ ✔ focusing on the CSR initiatives of those institutions. 2. Improve visibility and increase people’s awareness through environmental education, communication, marketing and campaigns 3. Increase investment in R&D by 10% that would aim to capture the environmental situation which would aid WWF in their efficient planning of conservation efforts 22 I. Decision Stage In the decision stage, the strategies that were evaluated using Rumelt’s criteria and the matching matrices will be compared and assessed. Their relative attractiveness will be determined based on the key internal and external factors derived from the input stage matrices: IFE, EFE and CPM. Four strategies evaluated previously, however, only three will be included in the QSPM as the strategy to “increase efforts on fundraising” is a basic strategy of non-profit organiztaions to fund their conservation efforts. Moreover, the fourth strategy and the second strategy which is to “improve visibility and increase people’s awareness’” are somehow overlapping which violates the rule that strategies evaluated in the QSPM must be mutually exclusive. Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix Strategy 1 Strategy 2 Strategy 3 Increase Improve visibility Strengthen public and private collaborations focusing on the CSR initiatives of those institutions. and increase people’s awareness through environmental education, communication, marketing and campaigns investment in R&D by 10% that would aim to capture the environmental stuation which would aid WWF in their efficient planning of conservation efforts and monitoring emerging threats 23 Key Factors Weight AS TAS AS TAS AS TAS 0.09 2 0.18 3 0.27 4 0.36 0.06 4 0.24 3 0.18 2 0.12 0.07 4 0.28 3 0.21 2 0.14 0.06 4 0.24 2 0.12 3 0.18 0.06 4 0.24 3 0.18 2 0.12 0.05 4 0.2 3 0.15 2 0.1 Strengths 1. Had an expense of only $0.0985 for each $1 raised making it one of the top non-profit organizations. ($291.49M operating revenue were generated in 2014 from $28.7 M fundraising expense). 2. 77% of revenues were spent in direct support of conservation programs. 3. World’s largest independent, nonprofit conservation organization with a strong brand name and a long, respected history of successful track records. 4. Administrative expense and fundraising expenses represent only 4.8% and 10.8% of total expenses respectively. 5. Has great global presence (operates in 100 countries, 1M members in the US, 5M members globally, 6200 fulltime staff). 6. Partnership with big organizations such as UNEP, IUCN, Coca Cola, Avon, etc., in achieving WWF's objectives. 24 7. The current ratio increased from 2.28 in 2013 to 2.35 in 2014 while the working 0.04 - - - 0.02 - - - 0.02 4 0.08 2 0.04 3 0.06 0.02 4 0.08 3 0.06 2 0.04 0.03 - 0.04 4 capital has a ratio of 1.59:1. 8. Strong organizational code of ethics to remain global, independent, multicultural, and nonparty political. 9. WWF's 10-year goal to "measurably conserve 15 to 20 of the world's most important eco-regions. 10. WWF's successful past projects including Wildlands and Human Needs initiative on the co-existence of both rural people and wild animals without having negative impact on the natural habitats. 11. In support of global conservation, Bank of America has offered a WWF Visa card - - since 2009 12. Renewal of partnership with Coca Cola (partner since 2007) until the year 2020. The partnership focuses on reducing the 0.16 3 0.12 2 0.08 carbon content & sustaining fresh water supplies. 25 13. Recognizing its impact on the environment, Avon - a large producer of brochures and consumer paper products 0.04 4 0.16 3 0.12 2 0.08 0.07 4 0.28 3 0.21 2 0.14 0.05 3 0.15 4 0.2 2 0.1 0.06 - - - 0.04 - - - 0.03 3 with distribution in over 120 countries, has partnered with WWF in two key areas. Weaknesses 1. In-kind contribution decreased by 27% from $64.3M in 2013 to $46.96M in 2014 which is not good since funding relies heavily on contribution. 2. Operating Expense on Public Education Program decreased by 20.83% from $81.74M in 2013 to $64.71M in 2014. 3. Have a broad focus, mission, and vision which may be difficult to attend to. 4. Have dual title in their Organizational Structure such as that for President and CEO, and Senior Vice President and General Counsel. 5. WWF's stand in Cecil the Lion's killing issue when they tolerated hunting for 0.09 4 0.12 2 0.06 sports. 26 6. Individuals contributed 32% while corporations contributed only 4% of total 0.03 4 0.12 3 0.09 2 0.06 0.02 3 0.06 4 0.08 2 0.04 0.05 2 0.1 3 0.15 4 0.2 0.03 3 0.09 2 0.06 4 0.12 0.02 - revenue. 7. Bequests, endowments, and split income gifts decreased by 58.27% from $29.21M in 2013 to $12.19M in 2014. 8. No distinguishing characteristic from competitors. 9. Even with WWF's efforts to save Rhinos, still, Rhino poaching has increased by 9,346% from 2007 to 2014. 10. Total asset turnover decreased from 0.61% in 2013 to 0.59% in 2014. - - 1 Opportunites 1. Expansion of WWF Office to Myanmar after partnering with the government (regarded as rich natural capital; 3 pristine 0.06 4 0.24 3 0.18 2 0.12 0.05 3 0.15 4 0.2 2 0.1 rivers, over 250 mammal species, more than 10000 bird species) 2. Global awareness for wildlife welfare on many fronts was raised due to the death of Cecil (a lion) by a hunter named Palmer 27 3. Increase of 12% contribution from 20132014 for non-profit organizations, philanthropy is now becoming more 0.04 3 0.12 4 0.16 2 0.08 0.05 4 0.2 3 0.15 2 0.1 0.06 3 0.18 2 0.12 4 0.24 0.05 4 0.2 3 0.15 2 0.1 0.06 3 0.18 2 0.12 4 0.24 prevalent. 4. In 2014, HP Canada partnered with WWF to launch Spring Things – which creates a link between employees and environmental conservation through events and campaigns 5. In 2014, WWF worked with the Namibian Ministry of Environment and Tourism to field test an integrated network of technologies. In the second phase, WWF will work with additional governments, including Nepal and Kenya, to implement the project under different field conditions. 6. A US government legislation was implemented - Wildlife Trafficking Enforcement Act, which increased the penalties associated with wildlife trafficking 7. Establishment the Bioplastic Feedstock Alliance, where leading global companies have committed to the development of 28 plastics made from plant-based material 8. 1 billion people rely on fish as an important part of their diet and that more than 520 million livelihoods are supported 0.06 3 0.18 4 0.24 2 0.12 0.07 2 0.14 4 0.28 3 0.21 0.05 4 0.2 3 0.15 2 0.1 0.03 4 0.12 3 0.09 2 0.06 0.05 4 0.2 3 0.15 2 0.1 by fishing and its related activities. 9. According to National Geographic, 68% of consumers in 18 countries believe that climate changes are due to human actions 10. According to Fortune, 100 companies report savings of$1.1 billion annually through energy efficiency and renewable energy. 11. According to New York Times, number of nonprofits has increased 60% in the last decade. Threats 1. The Nature Conservancy’s research shows that currently half of the world’s major rivers are seriously polluted and/or depleted and that within 10 years, most people on the planet will face water 29 shortages 2. Global condition of wildlife and wild areas has steadily declined, especially in the ocean, 60 percent of the world’s 0.06 4 0.24 3 0.18 2 0.12 0.05 2 0.1 4 0.2 3 0.15 0.04 2 0.08 4 0.16 3 0.12 0.03 4 0.12 3 0.09 2 0.06 ecosystems declined. 3. World’s population expected to grow to 9 billion by 2050 and the demand for food is expected to double 4. Leading hazards to human health are climate change, stratospheric ozone depletion, changes in ecosystems due to loss of biodiversity, changes in hydrological systems and the supply of freshwater, land degradation, and stresses on food-producing systems. 5. Only 3.4% of oceans are being protected - they might cover over 70% of our planet’s surface, but even the vast majority of the world’s few marine parks and reserves are protected in name only. 30 6. International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) forecasts a temperature rise of 2.5 0.04 2 0.08 4 0.16 3 0.12 0.02 4 0.08 3 0.06 2 0.04 0.04 4 0.16 3 0.12 2 0.08 0.04 4 0.16 3 0.12 2 0.08 0.05 2 0.1 4 0.2 3 0.15 degrees 7. The Brazilian economy contracted 0.2 in quarter 3 of 2014, following a drop in the previous period. This is a threat to conservation efforts especially in the Amazon Rainforest 8. Globally, the loss of forests at a staggering 48 football fields per minute 9. Wildlife population of mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians, and fish have declined by 52% over the last 40 years 10. According to GEF organization, the land degradation affects 33% of the earth’s land surface, with consequences affecting more than 2.6 billion in more than 100 countries Sum Total Attractiveness Score 5.98 5.64 4.49 The strategies used in the QSPM were chosen after taking into consideration the current environment of the non-profit industry as well as the revisions made by the group in WWF’s mission and vision statements. 31 Based on the QSPM prepared, the strategy to ‘Strengthen public and private collaborations focusing on the CSR initiatives of those institutions’ is the most attractive strategy since it allows WWF to collaborate with other organizations in their conservation initiatives thereby significantly reducing the cost of such activities. The strategy to ‘Improve visibility and increase people’s awareness through environmental education, communication, marketing and campaigns’ is associated with the increasing trend of awareness that human actions are the cause of environmental problems. This strategy aims to further stimulate the consciousness of people and also obtain additional contributions by capturing the increasing trend of philanthropy. The third strategy is all about ‘investing in R&D for efficient planning of conservation efforts and monitoring emerging threats’. Basically, this strategy allows WWF to differentiate itself from its competitors by the use of technology in their conservation efforts. Also, it targets efficient operations in the long run. Given that most opportunities and threats are related to environmental issues, collaborating with other organizations for conservation projects adds to the first strategy’s appeal as it has direct impact on environmental issues. Compared to the first strategy, the second and third strategies are less attractive because awareness and R&D only has indirect effects on environmental issues. In addition, partnering with other organizations with CSR initiatives that aims to preserve the environment has a higher probability of success. However, we cannot discount the fact that the other two strategies are also beneficial for WWF because both have long term effects as compared to the first strategy. Hence, the team decided to implement the three strategies with varying time horizons. This will be reflected in our proposed Action Plan in the following section. 32 ACTION PLAN Projects Environmental Witness Program Eyes on the Sea Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15 Apr-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Apr-16 May-16 Jun-16 Jul-16 Aug-16 Sep-16 Oct-16 Nov-16 Dec-16 PLANNING PLANNING Panda Runner PLANNING PLANNING Save Maurice PLANNING Disrupt Tiger Trade Educational Summer Camps and School Campaigns Educational Awareness Action Fund Educational Awareness in Communities Oct-15 PLANNING Co-manage Salonga National Park with AVON Assessment of Myanmar Sep-15 PLANNING Fight for the Wild Increase Social Media Presence May-15 PLANNING PLANNING PLANNING PLANNING PLANNING 33 Strategy 1: Strengthen public and private collaborations focusing on the CSR initiatives of those institutions Project 1. Launch Eyes in the Sea Project with the US and other governments that supports the Port States Measures Act of the United Nations (to allow its enforcement – lack of ratification) that will help in completely banning illegal fishing through increased legislation A. Problem Illegal fishing is threatening the food supply of coastal communities as fish populations decline due to overfishing in areas fishers are not permitted to access. Illegal fishing is a key driver of global overfishing, it threatens marine ecosystems, puts food security and regional stability at risk, and is linked to major human rights violations and even organized crime. B. Goal Short term goal – convince governments to ratify the PSMA Long term – ratification of Port States Measures Act which aims to eliminate illegal fishing through increased legislation and regulations for ensuring traceability within the global seafood marketplace C. Environmental Impact Addressing illegal fishing will positively contribute to the equitable growth and empowerment of the people who rely on oceans for food and income D. Partners Governments and United Nations E. Resources Needed Sea patrols, Electronic Monitoring Systems, AIS F. Specific step to implement 1. Form partnerships with specific governments (Angola, Australia, Benin, Brazil, Canada, Chile, European Union, France, Gabon, Ghana, Iceland, Indonesia, Kenya, Mozambique, New Zealand, Norway, Peru, Russian Federation, Samoa, Sierra Leone, Turkey, United States of America and Uruguay). All the countries mentioned are signatories yet not all are already ratified. 34 2. - Encourage partner countries to push for increased legislation and regulation Prohibit foreign vessels that are suspected of illegal activity from receiving port services and access. - A vessel having a known or suspected record of illegal fishing would be turned away or subjected to immediate inspection. - If there is evidence of illegal catch, port officials would prohibit the landing of the catch. - Information is key. A standard document must be required of all commercial fishing vessels which would contain: i. Information that can document the legal origins of seafood as a condition of import ii. Use of a traceability system from bait to plate to capture key information iii. Border measures, building on existing government tools, that will facilitate efficient decisions for market access. 3. - Make technology available to all member states AIS (Automatic Identification System) which can reveal where illegal fishing activity may be taking place through the use of existing satellite data. Ships using AIS equipment transmit their identity, position, course and speed. Much like air traffic control data, AIS data helps prevent collisions and allows authorities to monitor vessel activities. The information is collected by special receiver stations along coastlines and recently by satellite as well. - Install electronic monitoring systems aboard tuna purse seine vessels and other commercial vessels, which collects and shares information in real-time to provide better estimates of the tuna catch G. Schedule of Implementation The planning part will include the identification of possible countries that will be a part of the program. After which, meetings will be held with the heads of the respective countries to discuss the Ports States Measures Act and to draft a stricter legislation with regards to illegal fishing that will support said act. Project 2. Use partnership with AVON to co-manage Salonga National Park in the Democratic Republic of Congo with the aim of addressing illegal logging, biodiversity loss and to support local livelihoods A. Problem: 35 - Disastrous mix of neglect, disarray, insecurity and poaching. - Insufficient management capacity, poor governance, and weak law enforcement devastated the park - Forest Elephants (Forest Garderners) have never been more threatened: poaching and trafficking are a highly lucrative business, prompted by the skyrocketing ivory prices on international markets - Logging, oil palm plantations, population growth and road development have strained the traditional resource management system. B. Goal To protect the park by reducing the illegal trade of bush meat and endangered species, enhancing law enforcement and prosecution of perpetrators, while also ensuring livelihoods for the people in and around Salonga. Also, have the Salonga National Park removed from the World Heritage Sites in Danger list as soon as possible and guarantee protection for one the DRC’s last remaining forest elephant populations C. Environmental Impact - Ecotourism assessment highlights the potential for tourism. Tourism fees can be used for maintenance of park. - Protection of biodiversity. Salonga National Park is highly valued for its fish diversity on which millions of people depend directly or indirectly. The park acts as a reservoir for fish stocks downstream D. Partners Congolese Institute for Nature Conservation, Democratic Republic of Congo and AVON E. Resource Needed Spatial Monitoring and Reporting Tool, Park Rangers, signages, funding F. Specific Steps for Implementation 1. Reinforce provincial governments, staff levels and funding levels to reach what is needed for effective management and protection of the park 2. Create agreements between governments to allow for free movement of park staff across borders and joint patrols, bolstering anti-poaching operations. 3. Expanding and professionalizing the ranger force protecting the park, ensuring stronger involvement of neighboring communities in conservation, promoting sustainable alternatives to bush meat hunting and fishing, and securing ecological corridors between the park’s two blocks 36 4. Address the needs of local communities that depend on the forests, empowering them to steward their resources and improve their livelihoods. - Provided fuel-efficient stoves and work with communities to find alternative wood sources through private and community forests to put an end to illegal logging G. Schedule of Implementation Meetings with Congolese Institute for Nature Conservation, Democratic Republic of Congo and AVON will be organized on the first three months to formulate specific action plan on the conservation of the park. Also, representatives from all parties involved will do visitations to check the manpower needed and to talk about the project to the people living within the vicinity. Project 3. Continue partnering with the US government, other governments and TRAFFIC to put increased security on wildland trafficking by launching the project Fight for the Wild A. Problem - Illegal wildlife trade is “the fifth most profitable illicit trade in the world, estimated at up to $10 billion annually,” ranking behind drug and weapons trafficking - Rhino horn, elephant ivory and tiger products continue to command high prices among consumers, especially in Asia. In Vietnam, the recent myth that rhino horn can cure cancer has led to massive poaching in South Africa and pushed the price of rhino horn to rival gold. - Corruption, toothless laws, weak judicial systems and light sentences allow criminal networks to keep plundering wildlife with little regard to consequences. These factors make illegal wildlife trade a low risk business with high returns B. Goals - Aims to improve protection of wildlife by reaching countries not yet supported by current WWF projects on wildlife protection - Raise awareness for wildlife trafficking to gather Fighters for the Wild and encourage informed decisions when purchasing wildlife based products through public education - Prevent overexploitation of natural resources which harms the balance of nature as well as human livelihoods C. Environmental Impact 37 Maintaining the balance of nature and conservation of the world’s endangered species D. Partners Tech Companies (Google, Amazon etc), Governments (both current members and nonmembers) , TRAFFIC E. Resource Needed - Electronic eye Technology - Wildlife Crime Technology Project (with Google) i. Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) for rapid response ii. Digital monitoring systems that monitor high-risk areas and boundaries of protected areas iii. Affordable wildlife/patrol tracking devices connected through mesh networks iv. Acoustic detection software v. Micro-radar for monitoring and detection vi. Thermal cameras and human detection software vii. Data integration and analysis through Spatial Monitoring and Reporting Tool (SMART) F. Specific Steps for Implementation 1. Partner with countries not yet part of WWF’s action for Wildlife Protection (Philippines, Australia etc) 2. Strengthen wildlife laws with higher fines and jail times of member countries to help deter poaching and trafficking 3. Stationing inspectors at ports across the country and providing enforcement training around the world 4. Combines more traditional forms of advocacy (billboards, magazine advertisements, op-eds) with technology (social media campaigns, online appeals) to create a global community response to the black market trade in wildlife parts. i. Raise awareness through campaigns (pamphlets, public service announcements, and infographics) 38 ii. Simplify shopping guidelines for consumers, identify prohibited products and eliminate the loopholes that make it easy for criminals to traffic wildlife online 5. Use Electronic Eye Technology and other technology based protections- The real-time monitoring system watches over a park day and night, alerting response teams with a text message or email at the first signs of human movement in restricted areas. G. Schedule of Implementation First three months will be allotted to establishing partnerships with the government and creating of drafts for laws that could strengthen the protection of wildlife in areas where Wildlife Protection is not yet established. Project 4. Form a partnership with Durell Wildlife Conservation Trust and Dreamworks Productions to launch the project SAVE MAURICE which aims to increase the protection provided to lemurs and other wildlife in the Madagascar forest A. Problem One of the main reason why the population of lemurs and other wildlife found in Madagascar is being threatened is due to habitat loss. Their habitats are being cut down at an alarming rate B. Goal Short term goal – to protect lemurs and other wildlife in Madagascar forest through habitat protection and restoration Long term –– increase the number of lemurs and other wildlife in Madagascar forest C. Environmental Impact It is important to save the wildlife because they maintain the “balance” of nature. In the case of lemurs, they are the major dispersals of tree seeds native to the Madagascar forests. With the threat of extinction on their species, the balance of nature is being disrupted. 39 D. Partners Durell Wildlife Conservation Trust and Dreamworks Productions E. Resources Needed Seedlings/saplings, national park F. Specific step to implement 1. Reforestation programs (Reforestation grants): a. One reason lemurs and other species are so endangered is that their habitats are being cut down at an alarming rate. b. focuses on supporting communities in regaining ecological integrity and enhancing human wellbeing in deforested and degraded landscapes through forest restoration c. communities must be tapped to initiate reforestation efforts with the partnership of Durell Wildlife Conservation Trust and Dreamworks Productions 2. Enhance ecotourism to benefit the wildlife and the people a. Adopt a national park located in Madagascar forest where the conservation efforts of saving and protecting the wildlife would focus b. Income from the tourists should be used to maintain the national park c. Require each tourist to plant a tree within the national park G. Schedule of Implementation First 3 months will be for planning, but in the first month there should be a meeting with Durell Wildlife Conservation Trust and Dreamworks Productions if they will agree on the partnership. Visit the national parks to be adopted during this duration and also try the “plant a tree” every visit in the said national park. For the 2nd to 3rd months of the first year there will be visitations to lemurs and start on the reforestation projects. Project 5. Disrupt the global tiger trade in Myanmar through the Wildlife Crime Law Reinforcement and promotion of new wildlife legislation to improve brand image A. Problem Illegal wildlife trade has always been a problem to the tigers in Myanmar. These tigers are illegally hunted in the regions of Myanmar and parts as ornaments are being sold in the Asian markets B. Goal 40 Short term-strengthen the enforcement of Wildlife Crime Law Reinforcement Long term-stop illegal trade of tigers C. Environmental Impact Having an effective law against tiger trade and protecting their species would increase the number of tigers. D. Partners Government of Myanmar, media E. Resources needed Patrol cars, CCTV F. Specific step to implement 1. Monitor poaching activities a. Policemen/guards be assigned in the areas where tigers are located to increase the presence of the law b. Screen the people to be assigned through a strict screening process in order to make sure that they cannot be bribed by the illegal hunters 2. Support the law against trafficking a. News regarding traffickers should be highlighted and not to be taken for granted b. Instill in the mind of the public the consequences of participating in the illegal act through the news 3. Stop the buying c. Conduct a surprise visit in the market and confiscate products that are found to be from the tigers G. Schedule of Implementation First month should be meeting with the government of Myanmar as well as their Ministry on Environment to discuss details on how to effectively lessen illegal trade. On the first three months of observing the current situation and planning, creation of the draft for a law against illegal tiger trade. Project 6. Form a team that would assess Myanmar’s natural resources which would include identifying where they are located, what benefits they provide to 41 people and how they might change under different climate change and development scenarios. This assessment may enable better policy decisions for the country as a whole A. Problem Myanmar is the newest office site of WWF. Since it is new, WWF does not still have full knowledge of the effect of climate change and development on a specific natural resource, B. Goal Short term-asses Myanmar’s natural resources and identify possible problems Long term- Develop policies from the assessment C. Environmental Impact People are better equipped with knowledge on how to manage natural resources to withstand climate change and development D. Partners Government, NGOs, E. Resources needed Assessment tools ,monitoring instrument F. Specific step to implement 1. Identify Key Areas/natural resource 2. Include areas that need to be prioritized 3. Asses the identified areas including the monitoring and maintenance 4. Analyze and interpret data from assessment and use this to design and implement policies for the future G. Schedule of Implementation Since the WWF Office in Myanmar is newly established and the said country is known for its biodiversity and endangered species, the first 2 months should concentrate on forming a team that will assess the situation of eco regions as well as researchers who can capture the impacts of adverse environmental happenings. This includes meeting with various NGOs and deploying them to different areas for assessment. After this, WWF Myanmar together with the government can develop policies for the conservation of affected areas. 42 Strategy 2: Improve visibility and increase people’s awareness through environmental education, communication, marketing and campaigns. 1. Increase spending in public education by 10% to encourage increasing awareness of environmental issues (W2, O2, O9). A. Problem The financial statements show that spending in public education decreased by 20.83% indicating that lesser priority is given for educating people about the present and future condition of the earth. Environmental awareness for each and every one is vital for sustaining and protecting the environment. Thus educational funding should also be prioritized. B. Goal The goal is to increase environmental awareness to the youth, particularly high school students, as well as to the community living near duly protected wildlife habitats. This project will focus on some geographical regions in China, Madagascar, and the Amazon. These areas are chosen as the first 3 pioneer regions because of their characteristics of being biodiversity hotspots—a home to thousands of species on earth. Also, the regions to be selected are the ones wherein a certain community lives near wildlife habitats that need to be protected. By educating students and communities near these areas and instil in them respect and responsibility for nature, they can make a move to sustain and protect the environment that they are living in and at the same time influence the community around them to do the same. This program also gives opportunity for recruiting new volunteers for the organization and potential future ambassadors as well. Furthermore, this strategy also aims to help communities in having sustainable livelihood while protecting the environment that they are living in as well as the wild animals living near them. C. Environmental Impact Increased environmental awareness to people, especially the youth which comprises 1.8 billion of the world’s population, would impart to them the significance of being mindful of their actions and their respective consequences to nature. The collective 43 actions of each individual would have a greater impact in sustaining and protecting the natural world from environmental threats caused by human actions. D. Partners Ministry of Education (for each country), National and local government units E. Resources Needed Educational materials, venue for lectures and camp, campaign ads Budget: $ 6, 471, 000 (each year for 2 years) F. Specific step to implement Project 1: Generation Green Camp Gather student leaders from different schools near geographic regions chosen to a 5-day summer camp for environmental awareness (these students could preferably be Eco Club members of schools). The camp would include lectures about the environment, what people are doing, and consequences of what they have done to nature and the next generation (infographics from advertisement campaigns can be used here). This is the most vital part which should make the students believe that any small or big things that they are doing will have a great effect on the environment and urge them to make a move. Follow-up: the youth who attended the camp must instill their learning in their own school. If possible, staff or volunteers could also follow up these individual schools to make sure action plan is being implemented. Project 2: Educational Awareness Action Fund A fund of $1,000 or higher (whichever is appropriate) is given to each school’s Eco Club who would propose a project that is in line with the company’s vision and mission. These projects proposed would be examined and approved by a panel of judges. A project can be proposed by each school that will need the appropriate funding. A follow-up for these implemented actions is also necessary. Project 3: Educational Awareness in Communities living near Wildlife Habitats 44 Go to each community selected ask for permission from the community’s head to conduct livelihood sustainability program to their people Gather first and educate the people about the concerns in their environment, the consequences of their action, and the habitat and animals that they can potentially protect. Give proper lectures as to how they can live in their community without harming the wild animals living in the habitats near them while at the same time protecting those habitats for their benefits. Give proper lectures on making a living (such as making quality products from recycled materials, use substitutes to those products that are harmful to nature, etc.) Always follow-up the community’s progress time after time. G. Schedule of Implementation First three months of the Generation Green Camp will be on negotiations on the education department of each country or area to strengthen these projects for students like establishment of an eco-club which has goals aligned to that of WWF. If Eco-clubs already exists in each school, connection with must be strengthened in order to establish a relationship. After the preparation stage, a summer camp is to be held for members of these clubs on the fourth month (April 2015) and this event will recur yearly on the same month. For the educational awareness action fund, one month of allocation and budgeting will be done together with the clubs (includes visitation of during the establishment of club per school), this also includes orientation on the proper creation of activities and the right way of documenting the outputs per school year. Integration with locals and talks about environmental awareness and sustainable livelihood programs should be specific to the needs of a certain community; it would take 1-2 months for visiting and planning and 3 months for the proper lectures with the community. Follow-ups with the community’s situation will then be made every six months. Project 4. Increase Social Media presence by spreading infographic materials online, provocative ads, and videos highlighting environmental issues. And 45 actively updating social media accounts of WWF, such as Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram about current issues and activities of WWF worldwide. They can also use this medium to raise fund by mentioning the projects that needs fund that are to be implemented by WWF. They can post their bank account and other medium to donate. A. Problem Increasing harmful human activities that greatly contributes to biodiversity degradation. Another problem is the ignorance of people about the current environmental issues that are prevalent and alarming worldwide B. Goal Long term – To increase awareness and educate people outside educational institutions regarding issues and current state of the earth’s biodiversity. This also aims to increase funds through donations. To capture the attention of the increasing social network sites users. This is also an opportunity for WWF to easily get the attention and participation of all earth warriors worldwide. C. Environmental Impact This would lessen the harmful human activities if the people are aware. More supporters and donors for projects that would protect the biodiversity. D. Partners WWF supporters, Social Networking companies E. Resources Needed Technological Resource (Computers, Internet connection) F. Specific step to implement a. Release infographic brochures online containing news about alarming environmental issues. These brochure may also contain projects and plan of actions of WWF regarding these issues and how the reader can support these plan of actions. b. Release provocative ads highlighting disturbing consequence or consequences of human activities against environment and animals. They 46 can also highlight the current status of the earth’s biodiversity and animals that are endangered. c. Create informative videos that it can post online and use during symposiums or seminars that would highlight the negative impact of human activities to the wildlife and their habitats and can also emphasize the need for action and support of the viewers. These videos can also be shown to cinemas before watching movies, through these the viewers can be encouraged to donate and to join WWF’s activities. G. Schedule of Implementation WWF should not only be active in managing its website but also on their other social media accounts since the audience is a lot bigger on Facebook, twitter and etc. First three months should be allotted to a creation to small group of volunteers who will manage the said accounts. In this team, there should be a team who will do the official publications which will be posted online. Project 5. WWF can organize fundraising events like Run for Change, Run for Panda or Panda Runner, a marathon event globally. They can also organize other athletic fundraising events, like triathlon, cycling, and obstacle courses. A. Problem: WWF organizes very few fundraising events resulting to a low revenue from fundraising reflected on its financial statement. B. Goal These events would not only raise funds for the organization, these events can also raise awareness and at the same time it is fun and a healthy activity for the participants. C. Environmental Impact With the help of the funds that will be raised from these events, WWF can pursue more projects that would focus on protecting wildlife and their habitats. 47 D. Partners NGOs, Event Organizers E. Resource Needed Technological Resources (Computer, Internet connection) Finance F. Specific Steps for Implementation 1. Create advertisements and announce these upcoming fundraising activities a month before the event proper. Partner with event organizers in places selected. It is recommended to select first world countries to host these events. Or countries that highly supports WWF and NGOs that protects the environment. 3. Expanding and professionalizing the ranger force protecting the park, ensuring stronger involvement of neighboring communities in conservation, promoting sustainable alternatives to bush meat hunting and fishing, and securing ecological corridors between the park’s two blocks 4. Address the needs of local communities that depend on the forests, empowering them to steward their resources and improve their livelihoods. - Provided fuel-efficient stoves and work with communities to find alternative wood sources through private and community forests to put an end to illegal logging G. Schedule of Implementation Panda Runner is an annual event to raise funds and increase awareness, planning should start at the beginning of the year and should be minimum of 3 months since it should be done with sponsors, other interested partners and the processing of license and permits as well. 48 Strategy 3: Invest on Research and Development to capture the environmental situation which would aid WWF in their efficient planning of conservation efforts and monitoring emerging threats. A. Problem/ Current Research Mechanism: They conduct research on endangered species for every critical eco regions identified per area or country only, but the gap is to reach out to the local community for they are the ones who are experiencing the impact. Also this will focus on each area going to a global scale in capturing the real world impacts. The strategy on research should be a combination of fieldbased projects, and scientific research. It is vital to involve local communities and indigenous peoples in the planning and execution of field programs, respecting their cultural as well as economic needs B. Goal This strategy is positioned to be a service development for their research sector wherein they will have a more organized way of conducting studies which will not only focus in discovering the problems for each area but also its impact and partner with locals for each ecoregion to know more of details from indigenous people and local government units. Environmental Witness Program -Additional allocation of funds up to 10% increase -Call the program, “Environmental Witness Program”, (A Market Penetration Strategy). Implement it in each country they are already in. There is a need to be keen on the state of each area in order to have a more efficient planning: Determine the problems, how to solve and also to increase the awareness of the locals and also worldwide. This is also to determine, additional indicators and ways of thinking give new perspectives on the state of the planet. - Conduct research which will specifically capture the effect of specific environmental issue per area/country. Example: WWF in China 49 Eco-region Current Situation Impact Tibetan Plateau climate change is These developments evident, which has not only threaten the been rising on the survival of wild plants plateau at a rate of and animals, but also about 0.17C/decade threaten livelihoods over the last three as well as plans for decades the economic Possible Actions development of the entire Tibetan Rapid melt off of Plateau. glaciers on isolated but regionally important "snow peaks" that are scattered across the arid northern plateau; the disappearance of permafrost and the drying up of important wetlands and streams - document the real world impacts of climate change on the lives of people directly dependent on the land, such as livestock herders and farmers, through interviews with these rural dwellers C. Resources needed: -More WWF researchers assigned in a specific area -Partly, there will be a small portion of funds for the online publication of a newsletter per country/area. This will be distributed physically (to schools and government units) and also, 50 online. This will be an effective tool to update the citizens of the area of its current situation and also increase brand awareness as it becomes a strategic outreach to the people. -More volunteers to interview locals or to integrate with people near the affected area -the need for online applications to detect or monitor the environmental situation in a certain area D. Specific steps Specific steps for Implementation: 1. Local WWF must conduct a research to identify critical eco-regions or to prioritize 2. Identify the current situation, interview locals and government sector of the specific area for more information 3. Develop plans and partnerships with willing agencies or organizations in that country for efficient and effective planning 4. Results from the conducted research, capturing the impact of the situation in status quo should be published online, 5. Partner with the national government (or their department of environment) for the execution of solutions and plans developed. E. Importance Some of the issues faced by WWF is on the information it has released, one of which is in “June 2009, when Touch Seang Tana, chairman of Cambodia's Commission for Conservation and Development of the Mekong River Dolphins Eco-tourism Zone, argued that the WWF had misrepresented the danger of extinction of the Mekong dolphin to boost fundraising”. There must be a close relationship with the local environment arm of the government in the authentication of the research, rather than to conduct and conclude without any validation. This is to reduce miscommunication and false data that could have a negative effect on WWF’s brand. F. Schedule of Implementation 51 Environmental Witness Program is an enhanced mechanism for WWF’s research sector, planning on how this strategy (community and local integration, research on critical areas) will be implemented and talks with government and NGO partners will be good for 3 months. On the 4th month, WWF will start to look for volunteers for community integration – locals will be interviewed and this is part of the research program, at the same time documenting real life impacts of environmental dilemmas in a certain area. During this month, each WWF office of the mentioned countries will start to implement “Environmental Witness Program). 52 WWF WWF China China -Yang Tze - Great Mekong -partner with China Renewable Energy Entrepreneurs Club (composed of business men and govt officials on research regarding energy, funding on research initiatives, or for more volunteers -together with China and the China Council for International Cooperation on Environment and Development (this org published a footprint report in 2008) -partner with the national government, in order to connect with local government units in doing research, interviews on locals who are within the eco-region Brazil Brazil -Amazon Rainforest -partner with other NGOs in conducting research such as the Institute for Ecological Research -collaborate with Ministry of the Environment specifically with its arm the Institute of the environment and Renewable Natural Resources (IBAMA – implements laws on deforestation, ) in conducting the research and interview in the Amazon area Madagascar Borneo & Borneo & Sumatra Sumatra - home to some of the world’s most diverse rain forests and Southeast Asia’s last intact forests -unlike other WWFs local offices, this one should establish a defined partnership with the Indonesian gove rnment first. -partner with Indonesian Council of Ulema on Protecting of Endangered Species for Ecosystem Balance will serve as a tool to strengthen research conducted relate to endangered species esp elephants. - should collaborate with indigenous people of Indonesia because they are crucial to ____ -The world’s 5th largest island harbors lush rain forests, tropical dry forests, plateaus and deserts. -for research related to marine biodiversity, WWF Madagascar should work closely with National Authority for the Management of Protected Areas (ANGAP) and for the integration with the fisherfolks, partner with Malagasy Fisheries Administration -use their existing partnership with UNIMA (world renowned pioneer in the aquaculture industry) in starting research projects specifically on the conservation of shrimps. - Southern The Arctic Madagascar Chile -Home of Valdivian forests, and gulf of Corcovado (nursing grounds for whales and home to various water animals) - WWF office in Chile is still new and should establish a strong relationship with Chile’s Ministry of Environment which is also newly established in the year 2010. -For the forests, WWF can ask the help of the Forest Stewardship Council in identifying certified forests and for additional information in the conduct of their research. -For more scientific research collaborations can be made with Centro de Estudios Científicos (private non profit, focused on scientific research), and for integration to fisherfolks and communities near coastal waters Cetacean Conservation Center -where Bering Sea is located, home to Polar bear, Arctic wolf, Arctic fox, Pacific salmon, Seals -WWF is the only NGO which has an observer status in the Arctic Council, so it is easier to collaborate with the government when it comes to launching community integration so that locals of the arctic will be involved in capturing the impacts of climate change -WWF can also choose to partner with various NGOs but they can start with Circumpolar Conservation Union which aims to protect the ecological and cultural integrity of the Arctic by promoting understanding and cooperation among Arctic indigenous peoples. 53 ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE Existing Organizational Chart of WWF President & CEO Carter Roberts Chief Operating Officer Chief Conservation Officer Senior VP and General Counsel Marcia Marsh Steven Chapman Acting Senior VP, Government and Multilateral affairs David McCauley Senior VP Markets and Food Jason Clay Margaret Ackerley Senior VP Private Sector Engagement Suzanne Apple Chief Financial Officer Michael Bauer VP Human Resources Elaine Bowman VP and Chief Scientist Jon Hoekstra Senior VP Communicat tions and Marketing Terry Macko Senior VP Development Julie Miller SVP for Oceans Acting Senior VP Marine Brad Ack Seior VP Forests and Freshwater Tom Dillon Senior VP Wildlife Ginette Hemley's 54 Proposed Organizational Structure CEO Chief Operating Officer Chief Financial Officer President for Oceans & Marine President for forests & Freshwater President for Wildlife & species Chief Conservation Officer VP Human Resource Senior VP Private Sector Engagement Senior VP Genreral Counsel Senior VP Research & Development Senior VP Communications & Marketing Senior VP Government and Multilateral Affairs 55 The organizational structure should be changed as new strategies are developed. In WWF’s existing organizational structure, the president and CEO is the same person. In a good organizational structure, the CEO should not carry the title president but this title should be reserved for the heads of each division. In the proposed organizational structure, the position for VP and Chief Scientist and Senior VP Development were dropped. These positions are merged into one, the Senior VP for Research and Development, since their function is somewhat interrelated. The position of Senior VP Research and Development is responsible for reporting to the CEO any new research and development regarding WWF’s services. The Senior VP Government and Multilateral Affairs is made to report directly to the CEO instead of to the Chief Operating Officer because its function is crucial to WWF. WWF is relies heavily on partnerships and different governments are one of their major partners toward protecting wildlife. Each division’s position title was changed into president and the Senior VP Markets and Food is dropped since it in not in line with their mission and vision. The Chief Conservation Officer is made to report to the COO and not to the CEO because the function of Chief Conservation Officer overlaps that of the COO. PROPOSED STRATEGY REVIEW AND EVALUATION PROCESS Six criteria are to be used in reviewing and evaluating the implemented strategies. The following criteria are used: Impact In this criterion, it is being assessed whether each strategy implemented has achieved or has significantly affected the goals established and the vision of the organization as a whole. The intensity of the effect of the strategy to the organization is also to be assessed so that appropriate actions can be taken in order to improve the current situation. Internal consistency It is the relevance of the strategies implemented with regards to the organization’s vision and mission as well as its implementing policies. This criterion asks the question: “Are we doing the right thing?” It also assesses how important were the strategies implemented regarding the organization’s priorities and goals both for the short and long-run. It takes into consideration the cumulative impact of each strategy on WWF’s goals. The strategies should not only be 56 evaluated individually but also how they relate to one another in order to achieve the organization’s vision. Consistency with the environment It takes into consideration the sustainability of the projects implemented. If goals are achieved, the organization must also ask if the positive effects or impact that was made through these projects will be maintained even in the long run. It is vital for the organization to assess and make sure that the purpose for what the project were made, are consistently being achieved and is not just a one-time event. Appropriate use of available resources “Are the strategies efficient in operation?” This is one question that must be answered in this criterion. WWF should always make sure that the resources used for these projects are being allocated properly. Being efficient does not only save resources and time, but it also contributes to the achievement of the company’s objectives. Budgeted resource allocation is to be compared with the actual resources used to find out how efficient the project is. With this, the organization can assess how efficient they are and identify the key areas where they have to make improvements. Appropriate time horizon The time horizon is significant in every strategy. It must be asked: “Is the timeline that was planned appropriate for the strategies implemented? The time for each project must be enough to implement the strategies. Workability This criterion takes into consideration the effectiveness of the strategies implemented. It assesses whether the objectives of the strategies were being achieved and how big is the effectiveness of the project as compared to what was planned. All of these six criteria could determine how successful the strategies that have already been implemented are. It is to be noted however, that even though a project or a strategy has not been successful in some of these criteria, this does not necessarily mean that the entire project was a failure. The criteria were mainly intended to assess the strategies and find a way to improve them in certain areas wherein the organization believed they have deficiencies in. 57 CONCLUSION The stability which the species has enjoyed for over 11,700 years, that has allowed civilization to flourish, can no longer be relied upon. Hence, it is a big challenge for WWF to achieve its advocacy a hundred percent. As part of fulfilling its mission and vision, it is a must for WWF to increase its collaborations with other organizations to support their endeavors. From companies seeking sustainable ways of doing business, to governments establishing protected areas. From local non-governmental organizations delivering specific on-the-ground projects, to global NGOs coordinating mass mobilization actions. From international conventions driving better laws and policies, to local people managing and protecting their natural resources. Together with other strategies to be implemented, such as increasing awareness through education and thorough research and development for assessing wildlife’s current situation in a micro-level scope, we are confident that it will “contribute to the momentum to move from talk to action to ensure a resilient Earth for future generations.” 58