THD Reduction in Performance of Multi-Level Inverter fed Induction Motor Drive G.Durgasukumar, M.K.Pathak Abstract— Multi-level voltage source inverters offer several advantages such as a better output voltage with reduced total harmonic distortion (THD), reduction of voltage ratings of the power semiconductor switching devices and also the reduced electro-magnetic interference problems etc. This paper presents the application of simplified space vector modulation (SVM) method for three-level, five-level and seven-level diode clamped inverters feeding a three-phase Induction motor. The space vector diagram of the multi-level inverter is decomposed into six space vector diagrams of two-level inverters. This paper compares total harmonic distortion values of voltage and current waveforms of Induction motor to the conventional two-level inverter drive using diode clamped multi-level inverter (Three, five and seven level). Keywords— Five-level inverter, Induction motor, Multi-level inverter, SVM, Seven-level inverter, Two-level inverter, Threelevel inverter, Total harmonic distortion (THD). I. INTRODUCTION In a conventional two-level inverter configuration, the harmonic reduction of an inverter output current is achieved mainly by raising the switching frequency. But in high power applications, the switching frequency of the power device has to be restricted below 1 KHz due to the increased switching losses and also the level of dc-bus voltage. On the other hand, the very high dv/dt generated with high dc-link voltage is responsible for the electromagnetic interference and motor winding stress [1]. So from the aspect of harmonic reduction and high dc-link voltage level, multi-level inverters are more suitable. Many researchers have worked on the space vector modulation of multilevel inverters [2]-[9]. In [2], a method of SVPWM for high level inverters that represents output vector in three-dimensional Euclidean space is presented. The method is based on the fact that increasing the number of levels by one always forms an additional hexagonal ring of equilateral triangles, which surrounds the outermost hexagon. In [3], the hexagon representing space vector diagram is flatten and the reference voltage vector is normalized in order to reduce computations of the algorithm. In [4], a SVPWM with a predictive current control loop have presented. In this load current is predicted for all output voltage vectors of the inverter. The current error is calculated and the switching state is selected when the value of the error is less. In [5], a space vector modulation allows reduction in the inverter output voltage distortion due to turn-off, turn-on and dead times of power modules, without increasing the harmonic content. G.Durgasukumar and M.K. Pathak are with Departmant of Electrical Engineering, IIT Roorkee, India. (e-mail: durgadee@iitr.ernet.in and mukesfee@iitr.ernet.in In [6], a simple space vector pulse width modulation algorithms for a multilevel inverter for operation in the overmodulation range have presented.In [7], a relationship between space-vector modulation and carrier-based pulsewidth modulation for multilevel inverter has presented. In [8], a generalized method of space vector pulse-width modulation for multilevel inverter has presented. In this, instantaneous reference space vector position of a multilevel inverter is not required. Drawback of this method is it cannot identify the sector containing the reference space vector. Although these methods propose general SVPWM algorithms for multilevel inverter, the coordinate transformations used in these algorithms are somewhat complicated. In [9], a new simplified space vector pulse width modulation (SVM) method for three-level inverter is proposed. In this paper, a simple SVPWM method for threelevel, above three-level inverter and comparison of total harmonic distortion presented. By using the new SVPWM strategy, effective time calculation and switching sequence selection are easily done like conventional two-level inverter. Simulation studies are carried out using 3-Phase, 50HP, 400V, 50Hz, and 1500RPM induction machine. II. SVM FOR TWO-LEVEL INVERTER Fig.1(a) represents the typical power stage of the three phase two level inverter and the equivalent circuits of a threephase induction motor. Van,Vbn,Vcn are the pole voltages produced in the inverter stage and also the voltages that are applied to the motor. Eight different switching states (V0-V7) are possible for the three phase inverter. Note that all the machine terminals are connected to each other electrically and none effective voltages are applied to machine when the zero vectors presented by V0 and V7 are selected. The remaining six voltage vectors can be selected to apply an effective voltage to the machine and these vectors can be located on the vector space represented with the stator fixed dq reference frame as shown in the Fig 1(b). If a constant reference voltage vector V*or Vref is given in one sampling period, this vector can be generated using zero vector (V0 or V7) in combination with only two nearest active vectors (V(n) and V(n+1)). These two active vectors are considered as the effective vectors to generate desired output voltage. From the average voltage concept, the reference vector can be written as followings during one sampling period. כൌ ሺଵ Ǥ ୬ ଶ Ǥ ୬ାଵ ሻȀୱ Where T1, T2 are the applied effective times corresponding to the active vectors V1-V6. III. SIMPLIFIED SVM FOR MULTI--LEVEL INVERTER A. Basic principle The space-vector diagram of an ny multi-level inverter is composed of six hexagons, which h can be reduced insteps further into the space-vector diagraams of conventional twolevel inverters. The space vector diagram three-level inverter and its two level hexagons are show wn in Fig. 3(a) and 3(b). A multi-level space-vector plane is traansformed to the two-level space-vector plane by using the two steps. 1) From the location of a given reference voltage, one hexagon has to be selected. 2) The original reference voltage veector has to be subtracted Fig. 1. Two-level inverter and the equivalent circuit of a machine and Space by the amount of the center voltaage vector of the selected vector diagram of the effective vectoors hexagon. The effective time can be calculated as, Determination of switching sequeence and the calculation of the voltage vector duration time iss done as in conventional כ כ ୱ୧୬ቀ ିቁ Ǥ౩ Ǥ౩ ୱ୧୬ሺሻ య ଵ ൌ ଶ ൌ two level SVPWM method. మ , మ ୱ୧୬ቀ ቁ ୱ୧୬ቀ ቁ ౚౙ య య ౚౙ య య T0= Ts-T1-T2 Where T0 is the time corresponding to nulll vector Vdc is the DC linkage Voltage and Ts is sampling time. In Fig.2, the relationship between the efffective times and the actual gating times is depicted when the rreference vector is located in the Sector-1. In this case the V1 veector is applied to the inverter during T1 interval, and consequeently V2 vector is applied during T2 interval. In the three phhase symmetrical modulation method, the zero sequence vooltage vectors is distributed symmetrically in one sampling peeriod to reduce the current ripple. Thus, in general, the switchhing sequence is given by 0-1-2-7-7-2-1-0 within two sampliing periods. With the point of view of the upper switchingg devices of one inverter leg, the former sequence (0-1-2-7 seequence) is called ‘ON’ sequence, and the latter (7-2-1-0) is called ‘OFF’ sequence in this paper. Fig. 2 Actual gating signal pattern of the space vector PWM (in the case of the sector -1) Therefore, the actual switching times correesponding to the case of sector-1 can be written as Off Gating Sequence: ON gating Seqquence: Tga=T0/2 Tga= T0/2+T1+ +T2 Tgb=T0/2+T2 Tgb=T0/2+T2 Tgc=T0/2 Tgc=T0/2+T1+T2 Fig. 3 Space vector diagram of thrree-level inverter and six two-level hexaagons B. Correction of reference voltage vector v By the location of a reference vo oltage vector, one hexagon is selected among the six small heexagons that comprise the multi-level space-vector diagram. The reference voltage he selected hexagon. This vector should lie in the inner of th procedure divides the multi-level space-vector s diagram into six regions that are covered by eaach small hexagon. If the reference voltage vector stays in i the regions that are overlapped by adjacent small hexago ons, the multi-level spacevector diagram can have multiple vaalues that are possible. Fig. 4(a) and (b) illustrate two possible ways of selecting the switching value for a three-lev vel. Once the value is determined, the origin of a referencee voltage vector is changed to the center voltage vector of the selected hexagon. This is or of the selected hexagon done by subtracting the center vecto from the original reference vector, as a shown in Fig.5. Similar procedure is adapted for more than th hree- level also. In calculating the effective tim mes, the only difference between the two-level SVM and th he multi-level (Three, five and seven level) SVM is multiplying g factor 2 ,4 and 6 appears respectively. Fig.4 Three-level inverter simplification diagram (b) TABLE II FIVE-LEVL SWITCHING STATES Fig. 5 Change base vector of original reference voltage vector in three level Fig. 6. represent circuit diagram of a three, five and sevenlevel inverter and their corresponding switching states of uphase of the inverters are given in Table I, II, III. Switch ing Table P2 S1u S2u S3u S4u S5u S6u S7u S8u on on on on off off off off Term -inal voltage 2Vdc P1 off on on on on off off off Vdc 0 off off on on on on off off 0 N1 off off off on on on on off -Vdc N2 off off off off on on on on -2Vdc Switching states (a) TABLE I THREE LEVEL SWITCHING STATES Switching symbol P O N Switching states S1u S2u S3u S4u On On Off off Off On On off Off Off On on Terminal voltage Vdc 0 -Vdc (c) Fig.6 Inverter circuit diagram. (a) Three level, (b) Five level, (c) Seven level TABLE III SEVEN-LEVEL SWITCHING STATES Switching symbol P3 P2 P1 O N1 N2 S1u on off off off off off S2u on on off off off off S3u on on on off off off S4u on on on on off off S5u on on on on on off N3 off off off off off Switching states S6u S7u S8u on off off on on off on on on on on on on on on on on on off on on S9u off off off on on on S10u off off off off on on S11u off off off off off on S12u off off off off off off on on on on Terminal voltage 3Vdc 2Vdc Vdc 0 -Vdc -2vdc -3Vdc IV. SIMULATION RESULTS Speed(RPM) Torque(N-m) 2) Performance parameters of induction motor: ic(Amp) ib(Amp) ia(Amp) A. Two-level inverter fed induction motor Fig.7 shows the simulink model of two-level inverter fed induction motor drive. The corresponding line-line voltages and the performance parameters speed, torque (Te) and currents (ia, ib, ic) are shown in Fig. 8 and Fig. 9 respectively. 2000 0 -2000 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 Time(Sec) 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 500 0 -500 500 0 -500 500 0 -500 500 0 -500 Fig. 9. Two level inverter fed induction motor performance parameters Fig. 7. Two-level inverter circuit fed induction motor simulink model 1) Line-Voltages: B. Three-level inverter fed induction motor Fig. 10 shows the simulink model of three-level inverter fed induction motor drive. The corresponding line-line voltages and the performance parameters speed, torque (Te) and currents (ia, ib, ic) are shown in Fig. 11 and Fig. 12 respectively. Fig. 8. Two-level inverter line-line voltages Fig. 10. Three-level inverter circuit fed induction motor simulink model 1) Line voltages: 1) Line-Voltages: 500 vab(Volts) vab(Volts) 500 0 -500 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 -500 0.1 0.2 0 -500 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 vca(Volts) 0 0.12 0.14 0.16 Time(Sec) 0.18 -500 0.1 0.2 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.2 0.12 0.14 0.16 Time(Sec) 0.18 0.2 -2000 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 500 0 -500 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 -1000 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 ia(Amp) 1000 0 -1000 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 ib(Amp) 1000 0 1000 0 -1000 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Time(Sec) Fig. 12. Three-level inverter fed induction motor performance parameters C. Five-level inverter fed induction motor Fig.13 shows the simulink model of two-level inverter fed induction motor drive. The corresponding line-line voltages and the performance parameters speed, torque (Te) and currents (ia, ib, ic) are shown in Fig.14 and Fig.15 respectively. Fig. 13 Five-level inverter circuit fed induction motor simulink model 2000 0 -2000 Te(N-m) 0 Speed(RPM) 2) Performance parameters of induction motor: 2000 ic(Amp) Speed(RPM 0.2 Fig. 14. Five-level inverter line-line voltages 2) Performance parameters of induction motor : Te(N-m) 0.18 0 Fig. 11. Three -level inverter line-line voltages ia(Amp) 0.16 500 -500 0.1 ib(Amp) 0.14 0 -500 0.1 0.2 500 ic(Amp) 0.12 500 vbc(Volts) vbc(Volts) 500 vca(Volts) 0 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 500 0 -500 1000 0 -1000 1000 0 -1000 1000 0 -1000 Time(Sec) Fig. 15. Five-level inverter fed induction motor performance parameters D. Seven-level inverter fed induction motor Fig. 16 shows the simulink model of two-level inverter fed induction motor drive. The corresponding line-line voltages and the performance parameters speed, torque (Te) and currents (ia, ib, ic) are shown in Fig. 17 and Fig. 18 respectively. Fig. 16 Seven-level inverter circuit fed induction motor simulink model 1) Line voltages: 1) It saves controller memory in case of experimental realization because switching sequence is determined without look-up table. 2) It reduces the execution time off the Multi-level SVPWM because the effective times of voltage vectors are calculated in the same manner of o two-level SVPWM. 3) There are no significant chan nges in computation with increase in the level. Vab(Volts) 500 0 -500 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 8 0.2 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 8 0.2 Vbc(Volts) 500 0 -500 0.1 VI. Vca(Volts) 0 NCES VII. REFEREN -500 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 Time(sec) 0.18 8 0.2 Fig. 17. Seven-level inverter line-line vooltages ib(Amp) ia(Amp) Te(N-m) Speed(RPM) 2) Performance parameters of induction mottor: ic(Amp) ACKNOWLEDG GEMENT The help and support of Mr. Abh hiram during the course of this work is acknowledged. 500 2000 0 -2000 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 Time(Sec) 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 500 0 -500 1000 0 -1000 1000 0 -1000 1000 0 -1000 Fig. 18. Seven-level inverter fed inductionn motor performance parameters E. Comparison of %THD The %THD values of inverter line voltagees and Currents up to 1000Hz range is as given below. TABLE IV %THD VALUES Parameters Vab Vbc Vca ia ib ic 2 level 4.58% 4.83% 4.96% 11.86% 13.91% 15.29% 3 level 3.61% 3.76% 4.39% 6.89% 8.23% 7.86% 5 level 1.53% 1.84% 1.43% 4.22% 3.26% 2.41% 7 level 1.23% 1.27% 1.24% 2.77% 2.47% 1.96% V.CONCLUSION A comparative study on THD of output line-line voltage and current waveforms of two-level, three-levvel, five-level and seven-level three-phase diode clamped invverters has been presented in this paper using simplifieed space vector modulation technique. It is observed that as the level of inverter increases there is an improvement inn the performance of induction motor compared to the conveentional two-level inverter. The THD of line-line voltages annd phase currents decreases with the increase in number of levels of inverter. The simplified SVPWM offers following advvantages. [1] X. Wu, Y. Liu, and L. Huang, “A Novel space vector modulation algorithm for three-level PWM voltage source inverter,” in Proc. IEEE C and Power Engineering, Conf. Computers, Communications, Control Vol. 3, pp. 1974–1977, Oct. 2002. [2] N. Celanovic and D. Boroyevich, “A A fast space-vector modulation algorithm for multilevel three-phase converters,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., vol.37, pp.637-641, 2001. o, and L.G. Franquelo, “New fast [3] M.M. Prats, R. Portillo, J.M. Carrasco space-vector modulation for mulltilevel converters based on geometrical considerations,” in Procc. 28th Annual Conf. Industrial Electronics Society, Vol. 4, pp. 3134–3 3138, Nov. 2002. [4] G.S. Perantzakis, F.H. Xepapas and S.N. Manias, “ Efficient predictive vel voltage source inverters,” in current control technique for multilev Proc. 11th EPE European Conf. Pow wer Electronics and Applications, Dresden, 2005. [5] C.Attainese, V.Nardi, and G.Tomassso, “Space vector modulation algorithm for power losses and THD reduction in VSI based drives,” Electrical power components and systeems, vol.35, pp.1271-1283, 2007. [6] Amit Kumar Gupta and Ashwin M. Khambadkone,” K A General Space Vector PWM Algorithm for Multileveel Inverters, Including Operation in Over-modulation Range,” IEEE Trans. T power. Electron., vol. 22, pp.517-526, March 2007. yu Lu, “ Comparisons of space[7] Wenxi Yao, Haibing Hu, and Zhengy vector modulation and carrier-bassed modulation of multilevel inverter,” IEEE Trans. Power. Electron., vol. 23, pp.45-51, Jan.2008. [8] Aneesh Mohamed, A.S.Anish Gopin nath, and M.R.Baiju, “A simple space vector pwm generation scheme for any general n-level inverter,” p.1649-1656, May 2009. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 56, pp [9] Jae Hyeong Seo, Chang Ho Choi, and a Dong Seok Hyun, “A new simplified space–vector pwm method d for three-level inverters,” IEEE Trans. Power. Electron., vol. 16, pp.5 545-550, july 2001. G.Durgasukumar received d Master’s degrees in Electrical Engineering from J.N.T.U, Hyderabad (India) and pursuing his Ph.D.degree in the Elecctrical Engineering Dept, Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee, India. His research interests include power electtronics and electric drives. Mukesh Kumar Pathak k was born in Hamirpur (HP), India, in 1966. He did d his graduation in Electrical Engineering from L.D. En ngineering College, Ahmedabad (Gujarat), India, in 1986. He H joined Electrical Engineering Department of NIT, Kuru ukshetra (Haryana), India, as a Lecturer in 1987. In 1989 he joined Electrrical Engineering Department of NIT, Hamirpur (HP), India, where he serrved till 2007. Presently, he is working as an Assistant Professor in Electricaal Engineering Department of IIT Roorkee, India, where he joined in 2007. He obtained o both his M.Tech (Power Electronics, Electrical Machines and Drivees) and Ph.D. degrees from IIT Delhi, India. He has co-authored a book on n Electric Machines. He is Life Fellow of Institution of Engineers (India), Liife member of Indian Society for Technical Education (ISTE) and Systems Socciety of India (SSI).